pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.13529 · v2 · pith:TTGUS3YWnew · submitted 2026-01-20 · 💻 cs.RO

The OncoReach Stylet for Brachytherapy: Design Evaluation and Pilot Study

Pejman Kheradmand , Kent K. Yamamoto , Emma Webster , Keith Sowards , Gianna Hatheway , Katharine L. Jackson , Sabino Zani Jr. , Julie A. Raffi
show 4 more authors
Diandra N. Ayala-Peacock Scott R. Silva Joanna Deaton Bertram Yash Chitalia
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 15:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords brachytherapysteerable styletcervical cancerinterstitial brachytherapytendon-drivenphantom modelCosserat rod
0
0 comments X

The pith

A tendon-driven steerable stylet reaches lateral tumor targets from medial needle entry points in cervical cancer brachytherapy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the OncoReach stylet, a handheld tendon-driven device that fits inside standard 13- and 15-gauge needles used for interstitial brachytherapy. Straight needles currently restrict paths to straight lines, which can force more invasive placements to reach parts of a tumor. Design tests compared needle gauges, joint counts, and asymmetric disk placements to balance bending flexibility with axial push strength. A Cosserat rod model predicted the needle shape in free space for most cases. In a pilot with one expert user on a patient-derived uterus and pelvis phantom, the best design steered from central entry points to the outermost target locations.

Core claim

The OncoReach stylet, built as a reusable handheld prototype with manual tendon actuation, demonstrated the ability to steer from less-invasive, medial entry points to reach the lateral-most targets in a patient-derived multi-composite phantom model of the uterus and pelvis.

What carries the argument

Tendon-driven steerable stylet using spherical joints and an asymmetric disk design that maximizes bending compliance while retaining axial stiffness.

If this is right

  • Steerable paths can cover irregular tumor volumes with fewer needle insertions than straight-only approaches.
  • Compatibility with existing needle gauges supports integration into current clinical workflows without new hardware.
  • The Cosserat rod model provides a predictive tool for refining future joint counts and placements.
  • Medial entries become viable for lateral targets, potentially lowering tissue trauma during needle placement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tendon-actuated joint approach could extend to other needle-based interventions where curved trajectories improve access.
  • Phantom validation leaves open the question of how real-time imaging feedback would affect steering precision in an operating room.
  • If the design scales to smaller gauges, it might apply to additional minimally invasive radiation procedures.

Load-bearing premise

The patient-derived multi-composite phantom model of the uterus and pelvis sufficiently replicates the mechanical resistance, friction, and anatomy of living tissue.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of tip placement accuracy and required insertion force when the same steering task is performed in living patients versus the phantom results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.13529 by Diandra N. Ayala-Peacock, Emma Webster, Gianna Hatheway, Joanna Deaton Bertram, Julie A. Raffi, Katharine L. Jackson, Keith Sowards, Kent K. Yamamoto, Pejman Kheradmand, Sabino Zani Jr., Scott R. Silva, Yash Chitalia.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of a steerable needle configurations under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: MRI images of a tumor involving the cervix and uterus treated with brachytherapy. (a) Axial view and (b) sagittal view of standard interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) using straight nee￾dles. (c) Axial view and (d) sagittal view of a hypothetical ISBT plan using steerable needles. This plan enables greater tumor coverage and, conse￾quently, improved targeting accuracy whilst avoiding punc￾turing other vital … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: OncoReach stylet design. (a) System overview showing the tendon-actuation system, needle-stylet, and tracking mark￾ers for shape measurement. (b) Stylet design. (c) Routing disks for 15 gauge needle. (d) Cross-section of tilted tendon channels for smooth routing. (e) Routing disks for 13 gauge needles. (f) Asymmetric single-tendon disk with offset ball bearing for en￾hanced bending. disk, the tendon channe… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic of the OncoReach stylet mechanical model, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Phantom uterus in CAD with vagina positive mold. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between the model-predicted centerline (red) and experimental ground-truth data (black markers) for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pilot study setup: phantom with Syed template and tandem attached. (a) Expert user using the ultrasound probe to visualize tandem inside uterus. (b) Tandem entering the Hu￾mimic gel inside the uterus. (c) Obturator fitting inside the vagi￾nal cavity. (d) Pilot study setup. The clinical expert can successfully visualize the tandem entering the uterus through the Humimic gel using the ul￾trasound probe ( [P… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Needle insertion results. (a) Inferior view of the phantom, highlighting entry points and their respective CT sub-figures (tar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cervical cancer accounts for a significant portion of the global cancer burden among women. Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) is a standard procedure for treating cervical cancer; it involves placing a radioactive source through a straight hollow needle within or in close proximity to the tumor and surrounding tissue. However, the use of straight needles limits surgical planning to a linear needle path. We present the OncoReach stylet, a handheld, tendon-driven steerable stylet designed for compatibility with standard ISBT 15- and 13-gauge needles. Building upon our prior work, we evaluated design parameters like needle gauge, spherical joint count and spherical joint placement, including an asymmetric disk design to identify a configuration that maximizes bending compliance while retaining axial stiffness. Free space experiments quantified tip deflection across configurations, and a two-tube Cosserat rod model accurately predicted the centerline shape of the needle for most trials. The best performing configuration was integrated into a reusable handheld prototype that enables manual actuation. A patient-derived, multi-composite phantom model of the uterus and pelvis was developed to conduct a pilot study of the OncoReach steerable stylet with one expert user. Results showed the ability to steer from less-invasive, medial entry points to reach the lateral-most targets, underscoring the significance of steerable stylets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the OncoReach stylet, a tendon-driven steerable stylet compatible with standard 13- and 15-gauge ISBT needles. It optimizes design parameters (needle gauge, spherical joint count and placement, asymmetric disk design) via free-space deflection tests, validates a two-tube Cosserat rod model against measured centerline shapes, constructs a reusable handheld prototype, and reports a single-user pilot in a patient-derived multi-composite uterine/pelvic phantom demonstrating reach to lateral targets from medial entry points.

Significance. The free-space experiments across multiple configurations and the Cosserat rod model predictions constitute a clear strength, providing quantitative support for the design choices. If the phantom results hold, the work demonstrates a practical route to curved-path access in interstitial brachytherapy, potentially reducing invasiveness while improving target coverage for cervical cancer treatment.

major comments (1)
  1. [Phantom Model and Pilot Study] Phantom Model and Pilot Study section: The central performance claim—that the stylet enables less-invasive medial access to lateral targets—rests on the single-user pilot in the patient-derived multi-composite phantom. No quantitative comparison of phantom stiffness, friction coefficients, or insertion forces against ex-vivo or in-vivo uterine/pelvic tissue is reported, so it remains unclear whether the observed deflection and reach will translate under real tissue resistance and anisotropy.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Free Space Experiments] Free-space experiments: The statement that the model 'accurately predicted the centerline shape for most trials' would be strengthened by reporting explicit error metrics (e.g., mean tip-position error or Hausdorff distance) and the total number of trials per configuration.
  2. [Pilot Study] Pilot study: Results are presented from a single expert user without error bars or statistical analysis; this is acceptable for a pilot but should be explicitly noted as a limitation when claiming performance improvements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and positive assessment of the free-space experiments and Cosserat rod modeling. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Phantom Model and Pilot Study] Phantom Model and Pilot Study section: The central performance claim—that the stylet enables less-invasive medial access to lateral targets—rests on the single-user pilot in the patient-derived multi-composite phantom. No quantitative comparison of phantom stiffness, friction coefficients, or insertion forces against ex-vivo or in-vivo uterine/pelvic tissue is reported, so it remains unclear whether the observed deflection and reach will translate under real tissue resistance and anisotropy.

    Authors: We agree that a direct quantitative comparison of the phantom's stiffness, friction coefficients, and insertion forces to ex-vivo or in-vivo uterine/pelvic tissue would strengthen claims about translation of the pilot results. The patient-derived multi-composite phantom was fabricated using geometry from imaging data and material selections drawn from published biomechanical properties of uterine and pelvic tissues to approximate realistic resistance and anisotropy. However, the manuscript does not include new ex-vivo measurements of these parameters, as the study focus was device design optimization and an initial proof-of-concept demonstration of medial-to-lateral reach. We will revise the Phantom Model and Pilot Study section and the Discussion to explicitly acknowledge this limitation and to describe the literature basis for material choices, while adding a statement on planned future ex-vivo validation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results rest on physical experiments and standard model validation

full rationale

The paper's central claims derive from free-space deflection experiments on physical prototypes and a pilot study in a patient-derived phantom, with the two-tube Cosserat rod model serving as an independent forward simulator whose predictions are compared against measured centerline shapes rather than being fitted to the target outcomes. Design parameter selection builds on prior work but does not reduce the reported steering reach or deflection results to self-referential inputs; the model is presented as a standard continuum mechanics tool whose accuracy is externally validated by the trials. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the key findings appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work relies on standard mechanical engineering assumptions for tendon-driven continuum robots and tissue phantom fidelity rather than new physical principles or fitted constants that define the result.

free parameters (2)
  • spherical joint count
    Different counts were evaluated experimentally to maximize bending compliance while retaining axial stiffness.
  • spherical joint placement and disk asymmetry
    Placement variants including asymmetric disk design were tested to identify the optimal configuration.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The two-tube Cosserat rod model accurately predicts the needle centerline shape under the tested actuation and boundary conditions.
    Invoked to validate experimental tip deflection data across configurations.
invented entities (1)
  • OncoReach steerable stylet no independent evidence
    purpose: To enable non-linear needle trajectories inside standard ISBT needles.
    New device introduced and prototyped in this work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5819 in / 1408 out tokens · 53323 ms · 2026-05-21T15:48:42.911301+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bilinear Model Predictive Control Framework of the OncoReach, a Tendon-Driven Steerable Stylet for Brachytherapy

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A bilinear MPC framework for a tendon-driven steerable stylet achieves tip positioning errors as low as 1.45 mm in phantom experiments, demonstrating feasibility for fixed and moving target tracking in brachytherapy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Cervical cancer incidence among us women, 2001-2019,

    Z. Shahmoradi, H. Damgacioglu, M. A. Clarke, N. Wentzensen, J. Montealegre, K. Sonawane, and A. A. Deshmukh, “Cervical cancer incidence among us women, 2001-2019,”JAMA, vol. 328, no. 22, pp. 2267–2269, 12 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.17806

    work page doi:10.1001/jama.2022.17806 2001

  2. [2]

    Cancer statistics, 2025,

    R. L. Siegel, T. B. Kratzer, A. N. Giaquinto, H. Sung, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2025,”CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 10–45, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://acsjournals. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3322/caac.21871

    work page doi:10.3322/caac.21871 2025

  3. [3]

    Brachyther- apy: An overview for clinicians,

    C. Chargari, E. Deutsch, P. Blanchard, S. Gouy, H. Martelli, F. Gu´ erin, I. Dumas, A. Bossi, P. Morice, A. N. Viswanathan, and C. Haie-Meder, “Brachyther- apy: An overview for clinicians,”CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 386– 401, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://acsjournals. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3322/caac.21578

    work page doi:10.3322/caac.21578 2019

  4. [4]

    Imaging of implant needles for real-time hdr- brachytherapy prostate treatment using biplane ultra- sound transducers,

    F.-A. Siebert, M. Hirt, P. Niehoff, and G. Kov´ acs, “Imaging of implant needles for real-time hdr- brachytherapy prostate treatment using biplane ultra- sound transducers,”Medical Physics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 3406–3412, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://aapm. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118/1.3157107

    work page doi:10.1118/1.3157107 2009

  5. [5]

    Anteverted uterus,

    “Anteverted uterus,” https://my.clevelandclinic.org/ health/diseases/22569-anteverted-uterus, Mar. 2022, accessed: 2025-10-27

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    What is an anteverted uterus?

    E. Millard, “What is an anteverted uterus?” https: //www.healthcentral.com/womens-health/ anteverted-uterus, May 2024, accessed: 2025-10-27

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    A new technique for performing syed-neblett template in- terstitial implants for gynecologic malignancies using transrectal-ultrasound guidance,

    R. G. Stock, K. Chan, M. Terk, J. Dewyn- gaert, N. N. Stone, and P. Dottino, “A new technique for performing syed-neblett template in- terstitial implants for gynecologic malignancies using transrectal-ultrasound guidance,”International Jour- nal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 819–825, Mar 1997. [Online]. Available: https://d...

    work page doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00558-5 1997

  8. [8]

    Towards a tendon- assisted magnetically steered (tams) robotic stylet for brachytherapy,

    P. Kheradmand, B. Moradkhani, H. Jella, K. Sowards, S. R. Silva, and Y. Chitalia, “Towards a tendon- assisted magnetically steered (tams) robotic stylet for brachytherapy,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Let- ters, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 6464–6471, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Mr-tracked deflectable stylet for gynecologic brachytherapy,

    A. L. Gunderman, E. J. Schmidt, M. Morcos, J. Tokuda, R. T. Seethamraju, H. R. Halperin, A. N. Viswanathan, and Y. Chen, “Mr-tracked deflectable stylet for gynecologic brachytherapy,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 407– 417, 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Towards steering a high-dose rate brachytherapy needle with a robotic steerable stylet,

    N. J. Deatonet al., “Towards steering a high-dose rate brachytherapy needle with a robotic steerable stylet,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54–65, Feb 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Towards a robotically steerable system for high dose rate brachytherapy,

    N. J. Deaton, Y. Chitalia, P. Patel, and J. P. Desai, “Towards a robotically steerable system for high dose rate brachytherapy,” inProceedings of the Conference on Experimental Robotics, 2021, pp. 233–244

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Towards fbg- based shape sensing and sensor drift for a steerable needle,

    N. J. Deaton, M. Sheft, and J. P. Desai, “Towards fbg- based shape sensing and sensor drift for a steerable needle,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 3041–3052, Dec 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Statics and dynamics of continuum robots with general tendon routing and external loading,

    D. C. Rucker and R. J. Webster III, “Statics and dynamics of continuum robots with general tendon routing and external loading,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1033–1044, 2011

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Design and control of concentric-tube robots,

    P. E. Dupont, J. Lock, B. Itkowitz, and E. Butler, “Design and control of concentric-tube robots,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 209–225, 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Forward and inverse problems in the mechanics of soft filaments,

    M. Gazzola, L. Dudte, A. McCormick, and L. Mahade- van, “Forward and inverse problems in the mechanics of soft filaments,”Royal Society open science, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 171628, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Model-based design of the coast guidewire robot for large deflection,

    Y. Chitalia, A. Sarma, T. A. Brumfiel, N. J. Deaton, M. Sheft, and J. P. Desai, “Model-based design of the coast guidewire robot for large deflection,”IEEE robotics and automation letters, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 5345– 5352, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    A novel multi- modality imaging phantom for validating intersti- tial needle guidance for high dose rate gynecological brachytherapy,

    B. Eckroate, D. Ayala-Peacock, R. Venkataraman, S. Campelo, J. Chino, S. J. Stephens, Y. Kim, S. Melt- sner, J. Raffi, and O. Craciunescu, “A novel multi- modality imaging phantom for validating intersti- tial needle guidance for high dose rate gynecological brachytherapy,”Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 24, no. 10, p. e14075, 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Multimaterial three- dimensional printing in brachytherapy: Prototyping teaching tools for interstitial and intracavitary pro- cedures in cervical cancers,

    S. Campelo, E. Subashi, S. G. Meltsner, Z. Chang, J. Chino, and O. Cr˘ aciunescu, “Multimaterial three- dimensional printing in brachytherapy: Prototyping teaching tools for interstitial and intracavitary pro- cedures in cervical cancers,”Brachytherapy, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 767–776, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    3d slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imag- ing network,

    A. Fedorov, R. Beichel, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, J. Finet, J.-C. Fillion-Robin, S. Pujol, C. Bauer, D. Jen- nings, F. Fennessy, M. Sonka, J. Buatti, S. Aylward, J. V. Miller, S. Pieper, and R. Kikinis, “3d slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imag- ing network,”Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1323–1341, 2012, quantitative ...

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Implementation of needle-tracking technology for real-time transrec- tal ultrasound-guided interstitial gynecological hdr brachytherapy: A feasibility study,

    L. H. Bloom, D. Ayala-Peacock, R. Venkatara- man, B. Eckroate, R. Sanford, J. Chino, Y. Kim, J. Raffi, and O. Cr˘ aciunescu, “Implementation of needle-tracking technology for real-time transrec- tal ultrasound-guided interstitial gynecological hdr brachytherapy: A feasibility study,”Journal of Ap- plied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 26, no. 6, p. e70100, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    As- sessment of needle bending and tracking requirements for optimized needle placement in combined intracavi- tary/interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy,

    A. Karius, V. Strnad, M. Lotter, S. Kreppner, R. Merten, R. Fietkau, C. Bert, and C. Schweizer, “As- sessment of needle bending and tracking requirements for optimized needle placement in combined intracavi- tary/interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy,”Strahlen- therapie und Onkologie, Feb 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-0236...

    work page doi:10.1007/s00066-025-02367-2 2025