Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

AFDM delivers 6G-level mobility and sensing without replacing the OFDM hardware chain.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 03:22 UTC pith:J2KS7CH3

load-bearing objection The compatibility story is clean, but the paper drops the prefix-wrap term in its own channel model, so the performance results rest on a channel that is linear, not circular, convolution. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.08163 v4 pith:J2KS7CH3 submitted 2026-02-08 eess.SP

AFDM: Evolving OFDM Towards 6G+

Hyeon Seok Rou , Vincent Savaux , Zeping Sui , Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu , Zilong Liu This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords affine frequency division multiplexingAFDMOFDM backward compatibility6G waveformdoubly dispersive channelschirp modulationfractional Dopplerintegrated sensing and communication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM), a chirp-based cousin of OFDM, can be the evolutionary 6G+ waveform because it needs only two lightweight digital chirp-rotation steps wrapped around the existing FFT/IFFT core. The authors build a generalized channel model with fractional delay and fractional Doppler, showing that AFDM keeps a structured, sparse effective channel where OFDM's subcarriers dissolve into interference. They quantify the extra cost at 12N operations per block, show that standard OFDM pilot, estimation, and detection ideas transfer, and argue that the tunable chirp parameters add index modulation, physical-layer security, and PAPR control. A sympathetic reader would care because it promises high-mobility and integrated-sensing resilience without a new air interface, at modest complexity and risk.

Core claim

On its own terms, the central claim is that AFDM is not a new physical layer but a re-parameterization of the existing OFDM one. Because the discrete affine Fourier transform (DAFT) is a DFT sandwiched between two diagonal chirp phase-rotation matrices, the AFDM modulator and demodulator are the OFDM IFFT/FFT with one element-wise chirp multiplication before and one after. The paper shows this preserves the one-dimensional resource-grid framing, allows the cyclic prefix to be kept (with optional chirp-periodic phase adjustments), and yields an effective channel matrix that remains structured even under fractional delay and fractional Doppler. From that structural identity flows the rest of t

What carries the argument

The central object is the discrete affine Fourier transform (DAFT), a unitary matrix A = Λλ2 F_N Λλ1 — a standard DFT preceded and followed by diagonal chirp phase rotations parameterized by λ1 and λ2. This identity makes AFDM a wrapper around the OFDM FFT/IFFT, which carries the entire compatibility argument: all OFDM blocks remain in place, and the two chirp rotations plus a chirp-periodic prefix (CPP) are the only additions. A second load-bearing piece is the generalized fractional-delay-fractional-Doppler (FDFD) channel matrix H_p = V^{f_p} Ψ(ℓ_p), where Ψ captures the inter-sample coupling from the pulse shape and fractional delay; it shows AFDM's effective channel stays structured wher

Load-bearing premise

The claim that AFDM provides 6G-level resilience relies on the assumption that the Doppler, phase-noise, and CFO advantages seen in simulations survive in real hardware with only the two chirp-rotation blocks added.

What would settle it

A controlled over-the-air or hardware-in-the-loop comparison of OFDM and AFDM using the same RF front-end, oscillators, and power amplifier under high Doppler and phase noise: if OFDM with standard compensation matches or beats AFDM's bit error rate, the central robustness-and-reusability claim collapses. Alternatively, modifying an existing OFDM modem chip by adding only the two chirp multiplications and measuring the actual overhead would test the 'no hardware change' premise.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • 6G+ terminals could keep existing OFDM RF chains, FFT engines, prefix insertion, and resource mapping; only baseband chirp rotations and CPP phase adjustments are added.
  • The computational overhead over OFDM is fixed at 12N FLOPs per block, shrinking relative to FFT cost as N grows (about 30% at N=256, 20% at N=4096).
  • Standard OFDM channel estimation and detection algorithms transfer to AFDM; in low-Doppler conditions AFDM can even be demodulated with a plain DFT, preserving backward compatibility with legacy OFDM receivers.
  • AFDM's tunable chirp parameters create new degrees of freedom for index modulation, physical-layer security, and PAPR control without changing the transceiver architecture.
  • Under phase noise and CFO, the paper's BER results show AFDM near-ideal while OFDM loses several dB, strengthening the case for high-mobility and high-frequency operation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: exercise the claimed reusability on an actual OFDM modem chip by adding only the two chirp multiplications; measured throughput, energy, and BER would settle whether the 12N overhead and resilience claims hold in hardware.
  • The FDFD channel model with pulse-shape-dependent inter-sample coupling is reusable beyond AFDM — the same virtual-path reformulation could let established integer-delay/Doppler estimation algorithms handle fractional channels in any chirp-based waveform.
  • If real oscillators and power amplifiers erase AFDM's phase-noise/CFO advantage in hardware, the backward-compatibility claim would still stand but the 'high-fidelity 6G+' conclusion would shrink; this boundary is worth probing directly.
  • The chirp-parameter domain suggests an adaptive-waveform control plane where λ1 and λ2 are negotiated per link, a capability OFDM cannot offer and a possible new feature for 6G+ standards.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents AFDM as an evolutionary 6G+ waveform. It develops a generalized fractional-delay-fractional-Doppler (FDFD) channel model that includes pulse-shaping inter-sample coupling, then argues that the AFDM transceiver is an OFDM chain with two diagonal chirp multiplications (Eq. (31)). On this structural basis it claims reuse of OFDM RF and PHY hardware, a modest 12N FLOP per-block complexity overhead (Eq. (38)), adaptability of channel estimation, detection, MIMO and multiple-access schemes, robustness to phase noise and CFO, and additional capabilities such as index modulation and physical-layer security. The overall conclusion is that AFDM offers OFDM backward compatibility while overcoming OFDM's Doppler fragility, unlike OTFS.

Significance. The algebraic identity A=Λ_λ2 F Λ_λ1 is a genuine, transparent strength: the hardware-reuse and complexity claims are verifiable directly from the equations. The generalized FDFD pulse-kernel formulation is also a useful framework for capturing fractional-delay effects. However, the paper's load-bearing performance claims rest on effective channel models that omit the circular-prefix wrap term, and the only new PHN/CFO BER figure lacks essential statistical and parameter detail. If the model inconsistency is corrected and the simulations are redone, the paper would be a valuable systems-level argument for AFDM in 6G+. In its current form, the quantitative robustness and performance conclusions are not yet established, although the structural compatibility argument is independent of the disputed model.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III-A/B, Eqs. (27), (33), (15)-(17)] The effective-channel models used for the numerical and estimation analysis are not the FDFD channel defined in Section II-C. Eq. (15) defines Ψ(ℓ_p)=G(ℓ_p)+Φ(ℓ_p), with Φ(ℓ_p) the wrap contribution (Eq. (17)). For OFDM, setting φ_cp=0 does not imply Φ(ℓ_p)=0; for integer delays the term is the upper-right part of the cyclic shift matrix, so Eq. (27) is a linear, not circular, convolution. Eq. (33) likewise replaces the wrap matrix by the diagonal phase-offset matrix Φ_p of Eq. (11), which cannot restore the missing entries. Concretely, for N=4, ℓ_p=1, G(ℓ_p) lacks the (0,3) entry, so the model does not correspond to the CP/CPP system of Eq. (10). Because Fig. 3, the BER curves of Fig. 12, and the estimation/detection formulas in Section IV-B use this channel, the robustness and performance conclusions are currently computed for a different system. The authors should either use Ψ(ℓ_p) th
  2. [Section IV-A, Eq. (39)] The complexity overhead expression is internally inconsistent. With C_AFDM,N = 5Nlog2N+12N and, as stated and tabulated in Table I, C_OFDM,N = 5Nlog2N+2N, the difference is 10N, not 12N, and the denominator should include the +2N term. The stated percentages (30%, 24%, 20%) are therefore overestimates. The qualitative conclusion of logarithmic overhead remains, but the quantitative values should be corrected.
  3. [Section IV-F, Fig. 12] The figure is the only direct evidence for the headline PHN/CFO robustness of AFDM over OFDM. It reports N=128, QPSK, θ_CFO=0.1, P=3, and LMMSE detection, but no PHN variance σ_Δ^2 (or ξ, f_c), no channel realization/delay-Doppler parameters, no channel-estimation assumption, no number of Monte-Carlo runs, and no error bars. The claimed 2 dB, 8 dB, and 10.5 dB losses/gains are not verifiable from the information provided. Please provide the full simulation setting and statistical significance, or temper the claims.
  4. [Section IV-B2c, Eqs. (54)-(56)] The fractional-delay estimation section replaces the Toeplitz G(ℓ_p) by a banded circulant matrix and rewrites the channel as P(2B+1) virtual IDID paths. The text notes the circulant approximation is exact only with a cyclic suffix or a negative-delay pre-processing, but the subsequent general claims (e.g., estimation beyond the Nyquist rate) assume it without an error analysis. Please state the approximation error or verify its impact for the parameter ranges used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III-E] The statement that OTFS 'absolutely requires dedicated pulse-shaping' is stronger than the cited literature supports; rectangular-pulse OTFS with appropriate equalizers is common. Since the comparative argument is otherwise based on structural reuse, softening this to 'often beneficial' would improve accuracy.
  2. [Sections II-C and III-B] The diagonal prefix-phase matrix Φ_p (Eq. (11)) and the wrap matrix Φ(ℓ_p) (Eq. (17)) share a symbol, which invites the confusion identified in Major Comment 1. Rename one of them (e.g., use D_p for the diagonal prefix phase).
  3. [Throughout] The chirp parameter notation is inconsistent: λ_1, λ_2 in Eqs. (31)-(32) become c_1, c_2 in Fig. 3 and later text. Please unify.
  4. [Throughout] Typographical and grammatical issues include 'reusibility' in the Section V heading, 'critival' in Section III-E, and several instances of awkward phrasing. A careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the AFDM/OFDM compatibility claim is a direct algebraic identity (Eq. 31), and the main complexity and structural results are self-contained; the paper's reliance on several self-citations is a survey-level feature rather than a load-bearing circular derivation.

full rationale

The central claim — that AFDM reuses the OFDM transceiver chain with only two additional chirp-rotation blocks — is not circular. Equation (31) explicitly factors the DAFT as A = Λλ2 F Λλ1, so the modulator/demodulator structure is an algebraic identity, and the 12N FLOP overhead in Eq. (38) follows arithmetically from two N-point element-wise complex multiplications. The generalized FDFD channel model in Eqs. (14)–(17) is a new modeling contribution, and the PHN/CFO robustness discussion is supported by an in-paper BER simulation (Fig. 12) rather than solely by the authors' prior work. The manuscript does lean on self-references ([28], [30], [35], [38], [60], [89], [110], [126]) for diversity, ISAC, PLS, and hardware-impairment claims, but these are mostly survey-level support and are not the load-bearing derivation of the OFDM-reuse conclusion. A separate, non-circularity technical concern: the transceiver models in Eqs. (27) and (33) drop the wrap term Φ(ℓp) from the generalized per-path channel in Eq. (15) (setting Ψ = G after assuming φ_cp = 0), so the effective-channel and BER analyses may not correspond to a true circular-convolution CP/CPP system; this is a correctness/consistency risk, not an equivalence-to-inputs circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or conserved quantities are introduced. The central mathematical objects—DAFT, CPP, FDFD matrix—are either standard AFDM machinery or a matrix bookkeeping of sampled pulse-shaped convolution. The main load-bearing assumptions are the sparse-path channel model, the pulse-interpolation model for fractional delays, and the banded/circulant approximation that enables the virtual IDID reformulation.

free parameters (2)
  • AFDM chirp parameter λ1 and guard width ξ = Example: c1 = (2(fmax+1)+1)/(2N) with fmax=3; condition λ1 ≥ (2(fmax+ξ)+1)/(2N)
    Eq. (32) ties the diversity claim to a manually chosen Doppler margin. The paper does not fit it to data, but every implementation must set it.
  • AFDM chirp parameter λ2 = Example: 1/(2N); otherwise ≪1 or irrational
    λ2 is free by design and is used for PAPR/ambiguity shaping, index modulation, and security claims; no measured value is justified.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Sparse P-path doubly dispersive channel with constant per-path gain h_p, delay τ_p, and Doppler ν_p (Eq. 1)
    All subsequent channel matrices are built on this sparse-path model; diffuse or time-varying path gains are excluded.
  • domain assumption Fractional delay equals pulse-shaping interpolation: s[n−ℓp]=Σ_m s[m] g(n−m−ℓp), with g(m)=p(mTs) (Eqs. 6-7)
    The FDFD model assumes the physical pulse footprint is known and resampling is linear; aliasing or unknown front-end filters invalidate the exact matrix representation.
  • ad hoc to paper G(ℓp) is approximated as banded with width 2B+1 and then circulant (Eq. 54)
    This lets the paper map fractional delays onto virtual integer-delay IDID paths, enabling the channel-estimation and beyond-Nyquist statements. The approximation is exact only with a cyclic suffix or negative delay.
  • standard math DAFT basis A=Λ_λ2 F Λ_λ1 is unitary and the AFDM CPP phase φcp(n)=λ1(N^2+2Nn) restores circular convolution
    Used in Eqs. (30)-(34) and in the central OFDM-reuse claim; it is the standard AFDM property, not proved here.
  • domain assumption Wiener PHN model (Eq. 90) and diagonal CFO matrix (Eq. 92) govern the impairment analysis
    The Fig. 12 conclusions depend on these particular impairment models and on unstated variance settings.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 37100 in / 13708 out tokens · 155474 ms · 2026-08-03T03:22:13.155209+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

As sixth generation (6G) standardization accelerates, there is growing consensus in favor of evolutionary waveforms that add new capabilities while preserving compatibility with the orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) core of 4G and 5G. This article positions affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM) as such a candidate, providing structural robustness for high-mobility communications and integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) over doubly dispersive channels while remaining backward-compatible with the legacy OFDM air interface. We first develop a generalized fractional-delay-fractional-Doppler (FDFD) channel model that accounts for practical pulse-shaping filters and the resulting inter-sample coupling. Building on this model, we show that the AFDM transceiver reuses nearly the entire OFDM chain, adding only lightweight digital pre- and post-processing. We then analyze the impact of hardware impairments such as phase noise and carrier frequency offset, and examine the advanced functionalities enabled by the chirp-parameter domain, including index modulation and physical-layer security. Assessing reusability across the radio-frequency, physical, and higher layers, we conclude that AFDM offers an efficient path toward high-fidelity later versions of 6G and beyond (6G+) communications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.08163 by Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu, Hyeon Seok Rou, Vincent Savaux, Zeping Sui, Zilong Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of a single path within the channel matrix under IDID and FDFD scenarios, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Impact of different transmit pulse shapes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Effective channel matrices Ξ for OFDM and AFDM, respectively on the first and second rows, in a 3-path doubly dispersive scenario with N = 64. The physical channel parameters are defined by path coefficients {1, 0.9, 0.8}, normalized delays {1.3, 3.25, 5.96}, and normalized digital Dopplers {1.1, −2.3, 0.85}, where for the IDID and IDFD cases, the delays and Dopplers are rounded to the nearest integers as … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of OFDM and AFDM transceiver structures, which highlights that the only structural difference lies in the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transmitted pilot vector multiplexed with data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Regular structure of z = FN · AH · x where x = [0, .., 0, x (pil) m , 0, .., 0]T , in the special cases 2Nλ1 ∈ Z and 1 2λ1 ∈ Z. Based on this pilot structure leveraging on special cases of AFDM parameters, the AFDM demodulation in (34) can be now performed using a DFT matrix FN instead of A, which yield yf = FN · r = FN X P p=1 hp ·Φp ·Vfp ·G(ℓp)  F H N | {z } ≜ ΞOFDM ∈ CN×N ·FN AH · x + FN w = Ξ OFDMz +… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of (a) the effective DAFT-domain channel matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The factor graph structure of the MP algorithm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Frequency mapping strategies for affine frequency division multiple access (AFDMA): per-block (top) and per-subcarrier (bottom) approaches. In the sequel, we briefly introduce AFDMA and its coexistence with orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), AFDMA per block or per subcarrier, and MIMO-AFDMA. 1) General AFDMA and Coexistence with OFDMA: Two distinct paradigms may facilitate AFDMA, as il… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spatial coexistence in MIMO-AFDM systems utilizing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: BER performance of OFDM/AFDM under PHN and CFO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Unified Framework for Ambiguity Function Shaping and PAPR Control in AFDM Systems

    eess.SP 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Unified AFDM waveform design framework enables ambiguity function shaping via weighted ISL minimization, PAPR control, or joint operation using reserved chirp subcarriers and a JIPD-MM solver.

  2. Joint Synchronization and Radar Parameter Estimation for OFDM-based DISAC Systems

    eess.SP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Joint TO/CFO and delay/Doppler estimation via bivariate GaBP in OFDM DISAC systems approaches CRLB in simulations.

  3. On the Robustness of AFBM Sensing to Power Amplifier Nonlinearities

    eess.SP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AFBM sensing performance remains largely insensitive to power amplifier nonlinearities because the modulation matrix structure controls distortion propagation in the ambiguity function.

  4. AFDM as a Software Upgrade of OFDM: One Firmware Patch, a New Frontier

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AFDM can be realized as a firmware patch on OFDM, enabling robustness to doubly dispersive channels and full uncoded diversity in static LTI channels.

  5. Artificial Intelligence for Spatially Reconfigurable Antennas: Movable, Fluid, and Pinching Antenna Systems

    eess.SP 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    A cross-architecture survey that organizes AI methods for movable, fluid, and pinching antennas by the joint optimization problem they solve.

  6. AFDM as a Software Upgrade of OFDM: One Firmware Patch, a New Frontier

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    AFDM is presented as a low-cost software upgrade to OFDM that unlocks full uncoded diversity on static LTI channels plus advantages for 6G mobility, ISAC, and IoT security.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 14 linked inside Pith · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    What should 6G be?

    S. Danget al., “What should 6G be?”Nature Electronics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    The road towards 6G: A comprehensive survey,

    W. Jianget al., “The road towards 6G: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 2, pp. 334–366, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds,

    C. X. Wanget al., “On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    R1-2508043: Feature Lead summary #3 on 6G waveform (Source: Nokia), RAN1 Meeting #122bis,

    3GPP TSG RAN, “R1-2508043: Feature Lead summary #3 on 6G waveform (Source: Nokia), RAN1 Meeting #122bis,” Oct. 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    TR 22.870: Study on 6G Use Cases and Service Requirements,

    3GPP, Group Services and System Aspects, “TR 22.870: Study on 6G Use Cases and Service Requirements,” Jun. 2025, Release 20, v0.3.1

    2025

  6. [6]

    RP-251881: New SID: Study on 6G Radio,

    3GPP TSG RAN, “RP-251881: New SID: Study on 6G Radio,” Jun. 2025, RAN Meeting #108

    2025

  7. [7]

    5G New Radio: Unveiling the Essentials of the Next Generation Wireless Access Technology,

    X. Linet al., “5G New Radio: Unveiling the Essentials of the Next Generation Wireless Access Technology,”IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 30–37, 2019

    2019

  8. [8]

    Dahlman, S

    E. Dahlman, S. Parkvall, and J. Skold,5G NR: The next generation wireless access technology. Academic Press, 2020

    2020

  9. [9]

    Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); physical channels and modulation,

    3GPP, “Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); physical channels and modulation,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Specification (TS) TS 36.211, 2008

    2008

  10. [10]

    NR; physical channels and modulation,

    3GPP, “NR; physical channels and modulation,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Specification (TS) TS 38.211, 2018

    2018

  11. [11]

    Synchronization techniques for orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA): A tutorial review,

    M. Morelli, C.-C. J. Kuo, and M.-O. Pun, “Synchronization techniques for orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA): A tutorial review,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1394–1427, 2007

    2007

  12. [12]

    An overview of peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission,

    S. H. Han and J. H. Lee, “An overview of peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission,”IEEE wireless communications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 56–65, 2005

    2005

  13. [13]

    Channel estimation for wireless OFDM systems,

    M. Ozdemir and H. Arslan, “Channel estimation for wireless OFDM systems,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 9, no. 2, 2007

    2007

  14. [14]

    Channel estimation for OFDM,

    Y . Liuet al., “Channel estimation for OFDM,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1891–1908, 2014

    1908

  15. [15]

    A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems,” IEEE Network, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Bliss and S

    D. Bliss and S. Govindasamy,Dispersive and doubly dispersive channels. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  17. [17]

    Multicarrier ISAC: Advances in waveform design, signal processing, and learning under nonidealities,

    V . Koivunenet al., “Multicarrier ISAC: Advances in waveform design, signal processing, and learning under nonidealities,”IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 17–30, 2024

    2024

  18. [18]

    Toward integration of 6G-NTN to terrestrial mobile networks: Research and standardization aspects,

    M. Harounabadi and T. Heyn, “Toward integration of 6G-NTN to terrestrial mobile networks: Research and standardization aspects,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 20–26, 2023

    2023

  19. [19]

    Toward 6G non-terrestrial networks,

    G. Aranitiet al., “Toward 6G non-terrestrial networks,”IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    Survey on device to device (D2D) communication for 5GB/6G networks: Concept, applications, challenges, and future directions,

    M. Gismallaet al., “Survey on device to device (D2D) communication for 5GB/6G networks: Concept, applications, challenges, and future directions,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 30 792–30 821, 2022

    2022

  21. [21]

    6G for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities,

    M. Noor-A-Rahimet al., “6G for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 712–734, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    Drone networking in the 6G era: A technology overview,

    D. Mishraet al., “Drone networking in the 6G era: A technology overview,”IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 88–95, 2022

    2022

  23. [23]

    Performance degradation of OFDM systems due to doppler spreading,

    T. Wanget al., “Performance degradation of OFDM systems due to doppler spreading,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1422–1432, 2006

    2006

  24. [24]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond,

    F. Liuet al., “Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Area. Comm., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

    2022

  25. [25]

    Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,

    Z. Weiet al., “Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 11 068–11 092, 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    Joint design of communication and sensing for beyond 5G and 6G systems,

    T. Wild, V . Braun, and H. Viswanathan, “Joint design of communication and sensing for beyond 5G and 6G systems,”IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 30 845–30 857, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    Optimized waveforms for 5G-6G communication with sensing: Theory, simulations and experiments,

    S. D. Liyanaarachchiet al., “Optimized waveforms for 5G-6G communication with sensing: Theory, simulations and experiments,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 8301–8315, 2021

    2021

  28. [28]

    H. S. Rouet al., “From Orthogonal Time-Frequency Space to Affine Frequency-Division Multiplexing: A comparative study of next-generation waveforms for integrated sensing and communications in doubly dispersive channels,”IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 71–86, 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing for Next Generation Wireless Communications,

    A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing for Next Generation Wireless Communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 8214–8229, 2023

    2023

  30. [30]

    Affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM) for 6G: Properties, features, and challenges,

    H. S. Rouet al., “Affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM) for 6G: Properties, features, and challenges,”IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, pp. 1–10, 2025

    2025

  31. [31]

    Affine frequency division multiplexing: Extending OFDM for scenario-flexibility and resilience,

    H. Yinet al., “Affine frequency division multiplexing: Extending OFDM for scenario-flexibility and resilience,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04735, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Affine frequency division multiplexing for 6G networks: Fundamentals, opportunities, and challenges,

    Q. Liet al., “Affine frequency division multiplexing for 6G networks: Fundamentals, opportunities, and challenges,”IEEE Network, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing With Index Modulation: Full Diversity Condition, Performance Analysis, and Low-Complexity Detection,

    Y . Taoet al., “Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing With Index Modulation: Full Diversity Condition, Performance Analysis, and Low-Complexity Detection,”IEEE J. Sel. Area. Comm., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1041–1055, April 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Pre-chirp-domain index modulation for full-diversity affine frequency division multiplexing toward 6G,

    G. Liuet al., “Pre-chirp-domain index modulation for full-diversity affine frequency division multiplexing toward 6G,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 7331–7345, September 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    AFDM chirp-permutation-index modulation with quantum-accelerated codebook design,

    H. S. Rouet al., “AFDM chirp-permutation-index modulation with quantum-accelerated codebook design,” in2024 58th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 2024, pp. 817–821

    2024

  36. [36]

    On the Robustness of AFDM and OTFS Against Passive Eavesdroppers,

    V . Savauxet al., “On the Robustness of AFDM and OTFS Against Passive Eavesdroppers,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., pp. 1–1, 2026

    2026

  37. [37]

    A Secure Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing for Wireless Communication Systems,

    P. Wanget al., “A Secure Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing for Wireless Communication Systems,” inProc. IEEE ICC, 2025, pp. 2701–2706

    2025

  38. [38]

    Chirp-permuted AFDM for quantum-resilient physical-layer secure communications,

    H. S. Rou and G. T. F. de Abreu, “Chirp-permuted AFDM for quantum-resilient physical-layer secure communications,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  39. [39]

    DFT-s-OFDM with chirp modulation,

    Y . Liuet al., “DFT-s-OFDM with chirp modulation,” in2025 IEEE 36th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  40. [40]

    Radar-centric AFDM waveform with chirp-domain index modulation for ISAC,

    M. Ahmadet al., “Radar-centric AFDM waveform with chirp-domain index modulation for ISAC,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 7, pp. 844–857, 2026

    2026

  41. [41]

    Multi-functional chirp signalling for next-generation multi-carrier wireless networks: Communications, sensing and ISAC perspectives,

    Z. Suiet al., “Multi-functional chirp signalling for next-generation multi-carrier wireless networks: Communications, sensing and ISAC perspectives,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06022, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    A complex wavelet AFDM scheme for integrated sensing and communication in LEO satellite,

    S. Sabuj, S.-H. Lee, and H.-S. Jo, “A complex wavelet AFDM scheme for integrated sensing and communication in LEO satellite,”Authorea Preprints, 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Affine filter bank modulation (AFBM): A novel 6G ISAC waveform with low PAPR and OOBE,

    K. R. R.et al., “Affine filter bank modulation (AFBM): A novel 6G ISAC waveform with low PAPR and OOBE,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05683, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Non-orthogonal affine frequency division multiplexing for spectrally efficient high-mobility communications,

    Q. Yiet al., “Non-orthogonal affine frequency division multiplexing for spectrally efficient high-mobility communications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09782, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Affine filter bank modulation: A new waveform for high mobility communications,

    H. L. Sengeret al., “Affine filter bank modulation: A new waveform for high mobility communications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03589, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Orthogonal Time-Frequency Space Modulation: A Promising Next-Generation Waveform,

    Z. Weiet al., “Orthogonal Time-Frequency Space Modulation: A Promising Next-Generation Waveform,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 136–144, 2021

    2021

  47. [47]

    Orthogonal time sequency multiplexing modulation,

    T. Thaj and E. Viterbo, “Orthogonal time sequency multiplexing modulation,” in2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2021, pp. 1–7

    2021

  48. [48]

    Performance analysis and approximate message passing detection of orthogonal time sequency multiplexing modulation,

    Z. Suiet al., “Performance analysis and approximate message passing detection of orthogonal time sequency multiplexing modulation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1913–1928, 2024. SUBMITTED TO THE IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS SOCIETY 23

    1913

  49. [49]

    Orthogonal delay-doppler division multiplexing modulation,

    H. Lin and J. Yuan, “Orthogonal delay-doppler division multiplexing modulation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 11 024–11 037, 2022

    2022

  50. [50]

    On OTFS using the discrete zak transform,

    F. Lampel, A. Avarado, and F. M. Willems, “On OTFS using the discrete zak transform,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops). IEEE, 2022, pp. 729–734

    2022

  51. [51]

    Y . Hong, T. Thaj, and E. Viterbo,Delay-Doppler Communications: Principles and Applications. Academic Press, 2022

    2022

  52. [52]

    Performance analysis of coded OTFS systems over high-mobility channels,

    S. Liet al., “Performance analysis of coded OTFS systems over high-mobility channels,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 6033–6048, 2021

    2021

  53. [53]

    On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels,

    G. D. Surabhi, R. M. Augustine, and A. Chockalingam, “On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 3049–3063, 2019

    2019

  54. [54]

    Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing for Next-Generation Wireless Networks,

    A. Bemani, G. Cuozzo, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing for Next-Generation Wireless Networks,” in2021 17th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), October 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  55. [55]

    Integrated sensing and communications with affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM),

    A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Integrated sensing and communications with affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM),” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1255–1259, 2024

    2024

  56. [56]

    An AFDM-based integrated sensing and communications,

    Y . Ni, Z. Wang, P. Yuan, and Q. Huang, “An AFDM-based integrated sensing and communications,” in2022 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6

    2022

  57. [57]

    Target sensing with off-grid sparse bayesian learning for AFDM-ISAC system,

    Y . Luo, Y . L. Guan, Y . Ge, and C. Yuen, “Target sensing with off-grid sparse bayesian learning for AFDM-ISAC system,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10011, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    An integrated sensing and communications system based on affine frequency division multiplexing,

    Y . Niet al., “An integrated sensing and communications system based on affine frequency division multiplexing,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2025

    2025

  59. [59]

    A novel angle-delay-doppler estimation scheme for AFDM-ISAC system in mixed near-field and far-field scenarios,

    Y . Luoet al., “A novel angle-delay-doppler estimation scheme for AFDM-ISAC system in mixed near-field and far-field scenarios,”IEEE Internet Things J., 2025

    2025

  60. [60]

    Normalized ambiguity function characteristics of OFDM, OTFS, AFDM, and CP-AFDM for ISAC,

    H. S. Rou and G. T. F. de Abreu, “Normalized ambiguity function characteristics of OFDM, OTFS, AFDM, and CP-AFDM for ISAC,” Accepted at the IEEE ICC 2026, preprint available arXiv:2510.11216, 2025

    arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Ambiguity function analysis of AFDM under pulse-shaped random ISAC signaling,

    Y . Niet al., “Ambiguity function analysis of AFDM under pulse-shaped random ISAC signaling,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04200, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    AFDM-based bistatic integrated sensing and communication in static scatterer environments,

    J. Zhuet al., “AFDM-based bistatic integrated sensing and communication in static scatterer environments,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2245–2249, 2024

    2024

  63. [63]

    ISAC with affine frequency division multiplexing: An FMCW-based signal processing perspective,

    J. Zhuet al., “ISAC with affine frequency division multiplexing: An FMCW-based signal processing perspective,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12308, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    AFDM-enabled integrated sensing and communication: Theoretical framework and pilot design,

    F. Zhanget al., “AFDM-enabled integrated sensing and communication: Theoretical framework and pilot design,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14203, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    AFDM-enabled integrated sensing and communication for 4D reconstruction,

    Y . Luoet al., “AFDM-enabled integrated sensing and communication for 4D reconstruction,” in2025 5th International Conference on Intelligent Communications and Computing (ICICC). IEEE, 2025, pp. 211–216

    2025

  66. [66]

    Performance evaluation of AFDM for integrated sensing and communications in doubly dispersive channels,

    K. Ramadan, A. A. Alharbi, and E. S. Hassan, “Performance evaluation of AFDM for integrated sensing and communications in doubly dispersive channels,”Defence Technology, 2026

    2026

  67. [67]

    Orthogonal Chirp Division Multiplexing,

    X. Ouyang and J. Zhao, “Orthogonal Chirp Division Multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3946–3957, 2016

    2016

  68. [68]

    Channel estimation, interpolation and extrapolation in doubly-dispersive channels,

    Z. Gonget al., “Channel estimation, interpolation and extrapolation in doubly-dispersive channels,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09381, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Doubly-dispersive continuous MIMO systems: Channel modeling and beamforming design,

    K. R. R. Ranasingheet al., “Doubly-dispersive continuous MIMO systems: Channel modeling and beamforming design,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.00964, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Doubly-dispersive MIMO channels with stacked intelligent metasurfaces: Modeling, parametrization, and receiver design,

    K. R. R. Ranasingheet al., “Doubly-dispersive MIMO channels with stacked intelligent metasurfaces: Modeling, parametrization, and receiver design,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 3801–3817, 2026

    2026

  71. [71]

    Flexible intelligent metasurfaces in high-mobility MIMO integrated sensing and communications,

    K. R. R. Ranasingheet al., “Flexible intelligent metasurfaces in high-mobility MIMO integrated sensing and communications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18793, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Reducing the peak-to-average power ratio of multicarrier modulation by selected mapping,

    R. W. B ¨auml, R. F. H. Fischer, and J. B. Huber, “Reducing the peak-to-average power ratio of multicarrier modulation by selected mapping,”Electronics Letters, vol. 32, no. 22, pp. 2056–2057, 1996. [73]3GPP TS 36.211 V17.2.0: Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) S...

    2056

  73. [76]

    Evaluation and design criterion for pulse-shaped AFDM,

    H. Yin, Y . Tang, S. Li, Y . Zhou, and C. Yi, “Evaluation and design criterion for pulse-shaped AFDM,” inGLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2024, pp. 4944–4949

    2024

  74. [77]

    On the use of a two-dimensional cyclic prefix in OTFS modulation and its implications,

    M. Mirabella, P. D. Viesti, and G. M. Vitetta, “On the use of a two-dimensional cyclic prefix in OTFS modulation and its implications,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 5, pp. 3340–3367, 2024

    2024

  75. [78]

    Implementation of an OTFS-DCP-based communication system on software-defined radios,

    M. Mirabella, P. Di Viesti, and G. M. Vitetta, “Implementation of an OTFS-DCP-based communication system on software-defined radios,” in2025 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2025, pp. 1–7

    2025

  76. [79]

    Pilot Aided Channel Estimation for AFDM in Doubly Dispersive Channels,

    H. Yin and Y . Tang, “Pilot Aided Channel Estimation for AFDM in Doubly Dispersive Channels,” in2022 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), August 2022, pp. 308–313

    2022

  77. [80]

    GI-Free Pilot-Aided Channel Estimation for Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing Systems,

    Y . Zhouet al., “GI-Free Pilot-Aided Channel Estimation for Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing Systems,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01088

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [81]

    Channel Estimation for AFDM With Superimposed Pilots,

    K. Zhenget al., “Channel Estimation for AFDM With Superimposed Pilots,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 3389–3394, February 2025

    2025

  79. [82]

    Pilot design for multiple domains channel estimation in special cases of affine frequency division multiplexing,

    V . Savaux, “Pilot design for multiple domains channel estimation in special cases of affine frequency division multiplexing,” Physical Communication, vol. 73, p. 102863, December 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1874490725002666

    2025

  80. [83]

    Special Cases of DFT-Based Modulation and Demodulation for Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing,

    V . Savaux, “Special Cases of DFT-Based Modulation and Demodulation for Affine Frequency Division Multiplexing,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 7627–7638, 2024

    2024

Showing first 80 references.