Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremA critical assessment of bonding descriptors for predicting materials properties
Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:45 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Quantum-chemical bonding descriptors improve machine learning models for predicting elastic, vibrational, and thermodynamic properties in solids.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Incorporating quantum-chemical bonding descriptors derived from a systematically generated database of approximately 13,000 materials improves the performance of machine-learning models that otherwise rely only on composition and structure features, and these descriptors further enable symbolic regression to identify intuitive expressions for properties such as the projected force constant and lattice thermal conductivity.
What carries the argument
Quantum-chemical bonding descriptors extracted from the extended Quantum-Chemical Bonding Database for Solid-State Materials, which encode bonding information from established theoretical frameworks and are added as additional input features to existing machine-learning pipelines.
If this is right
- Machine-learning models for bond-related properties achieve higher accuracy once bonding descriptors are included alongside composition and structure features.
- Symbolic regression applied to the descriptors produces compact, human-readable formulas for the projected force constant and lattice thermal conductivity.
- The performance benefit appears across elastic, vibrational, and thermodynamic target properties that are conventionally linked to chemical bonding.
- High-throughput bonding analysis can be integrated into routine materials-informatics workflows without requiring new theoretical machinery.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the observed gains hold on larger or more chemically diverse datasets, bonding descriptors could become a default feature set in materials property prediction.
- The ability to recover simple expressions via symbolic regression suggests that the descriptors capture physically meaningful combinations that might guide new analytical models.
- Extending the same workflow to additional property classes, such as electronic or magnetic behavior, would test how broadly bonding information transfers.
Load-bearing premise
The statistical tests used to confirm performance gains are free from data leakage or post-selection bias, and the set of 13,000 materials is representative of the materials space for the properties being modeled.
What would settle it
Retraining the models on an independent collection of materials withheld from the original database and checking whether the reported accuracy improvements remain statistically significant.
Figures
read the original abstract
Most machine learning models for materials science rely on descriptors based on materials compositions and structures, even though the chemical bond has been proven to be a valuable concept for predicting materials properties. Over the years, various theoretical frameworks have been developed to characterize bonding in solid-state materials. However, integrating bonding information from these frameworks into machine learning pipelines at scale has been limited by the lack of a systematically generated and validated database. Recent advances in high-throughput bonding analysis workflows have addressed this issue, and our previously computed Quantum-Chemical Bonding Database for Solid-State Materials was extended to include approximately 13,000 materials. This database is then used to derive a new set of quantum-chemical bonding descriptors. A systematic assessment is performed using statistical significance tests to evaluate how the inclusion of these descriptors influences the performance of machine-learning models that otherwise rely solely on structure- and composition-derived features. Models are built to predict elastic, vibrational, and thermodynamic properties typically associated with chemical bonding in materials. The results demonstrate that incorporating quantum-chemical bonding descriptors not only improves predictive performance but also helps identify intuitive expressions for properties such as the projected force constant and lattice thermal conductivity via symbolic regression.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper extends the Quantum-Chemical Bonding Database for Solid-State Materials to approximately 13,000 materials and derives a new set of quantum-chemical bonding descriptors from it. It conducts a systematic assessment using statistical significance tests to evaluate how these descriptors improve the performance of machine-learning models for predicting elastic, vibrational, and thermodynamic properties compared to models relying only on structure- and composition-derived features. Symbolic regression is also used to identify intuitive expressions for properties such as the projected force constant and lattice thermal conductivity.
Significance. If the reported performance gains hold after addressing reproducibility details, this work would provide empirical evidence that quantum-chemical bonding descriptors add value beyond standard features in materials ML, enabling more accurate predictions and interpretable models for bonding-related properties. The scale of the database and use of statistical tests strengthen the case for integrating bonding frameworks into high-throughput pipelines.
major comments (2)
- [Methods] The manuscript lacks explicit details on the train-test splitting strategy, cross-validation method, and any measures to prevent data leakage in the ML evaluations (Methods section), which directly impacts the reliability of the statistical significance tests for performance improvements.
- [Results] Descriptor derivation steps from the extended database and the precise architectures/hyperparameters of the machine learning models are insufficiently described (Results and Methods sections), hindering assessment of whether the gains are robust or due to specific implementation choices.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from specifying the exact number of properties evaluated and the types of baseline models used for comparison.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the constructive comments that will improve the reproducibility of our work. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested details in the revised manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Methods] The manuscript lacks explicit details on the train-test splitting strategy, cross-validation method, and any measures to prevent data leakage in the ML evaluations (Methods section), which directly impacts the reliability of the statistical significance tests for performance improvements.
Authors: We agree that these details are critical for validating the statistical tests. In the revised manuscript, the Methods section will be expanded to explicitly state the train-test splitting strategy (random 80/20 split using unique material identifiers), the cross-validation approach (5-fold CV), and the data-leakage prevention measures (ensuring no compositional or structural overlap between sets via material IDs). These additions will directly support the reported performance gains and significance tests. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Results] Descriptor derivation steps from the extended database and the precise architectures/hyperparameters of the machine learning models are insufficiently described (Results and Methods sections), hindering assessment of whether the gains are robust or due to specific implementation choices.
Authors: We acknowledge this point. The revised manuscript will include a new subsection in Methods detailing the exact descriptor derivation workflow from the ~13,000-material database (including bonding analysis steps and feature extraction) and will specify all model architectures and hyperparameters (e.g., model type, number of estimators, learning rates, and any grid-search or default settings used). This will allow readers to assess robustness independently. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The paper extends a prior bonding database, derives descriptors from it, and evaluates their added value in ML models via statistical significance tests on external property targets (elastic, vibrational, thermodynamic). No equations or claims reduce reported improvements or symbolic-regression expressions to quantities defined by the paper's own fitted parameters or self-citations. The central results remain independent empirical findings.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Statistical significance tests reliably detect genuine improvements when bonding descriptors are added to ML models
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanJcost_pos_of_ne_one; washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
max pfc = 1.77−4.25 (bwdfat dist0 / distat neg bwdf0); log klat 300 =−0.41−2.9 (pairbwdf skew mean / DensityFeaturesvpa); strongest-bond ICOHP correlates with max pfc (Pearson r=−0.91)
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.leanbranch_selection; RCLCombiner_isCoupling_iff echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
bonding heterogeneity (skew, kurtosis of BWDF) and effective interaction number (EIN ICOHP) reduce lattice thermal conductivity; significant MAE gains for max pfc, klat, moduli
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bond strengths in solids computed from a Wannier-type construction of local vibrational modes
A new Wannier-type construction of local vibrational modes in periodic systems yields interpretable bond strengths and shows phonon dispersion contributions to those strengths.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Data-driven materials science: status, challenges, and perspectives
Lauri Himanen et al. “Data-driven materials science: status, challenges, and perspectives”. In:Advanced Science 6.21 (2019), p. 1900808.doi:10.1002/advs.201900808
-
[2]
Data-Driven Materials Science: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives
Lauri Himanen et al. “Data-Driven Materials Science: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives”. In:Advanced Science 7.2 (2020), p. 1903667.doi:10.1002/advs.201903667
-
[3]
Machine-enabled inverse design of inorganic solid materials: promises and challenges
Juhwan Noh et al. “Machine-enabled inverse design of inorganic solid materials: promises and challenges”. In: Chemical Science11.19 (2020), pp. 4871–4881.doi:10.1039/D0SC00594K
-
[4]
Representation of compounds for machine-learning prediction of physical properties
Atsuto Seko et al. “Representation of compounds for machine-learning prediction of physical properties”. In:Phys. Rev. B95 (14 Apr. 2017), p. 144110.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.144110
-
[5]
Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects
Rampi Ramprasad et al. “Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects”. In:npj Computational Materials3.1 (2017), p. 54.doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5
-
[6]
Matminer: An open source toolkit for materials data mining
Logan Ward et al. “Matminer: An open source toolkit for materials data mining”. In:Computational Materials Science152 (2018), pp. 60–69.doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018
-
[7]
Electronic structure based descriptor for characterizing local atomic environments
Jan Jenke et al. “Electronic structure based descriptor for characterizing local atomic environments”. In:Physical Review B98.14 (2018), p. 144102.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.144102
-
[8]
Sherif Abdulkader Tawfik and Salvy P Russo. “Naturally-meaningful and efficient descriptors: machine learning of material properties based on robust one-shot ab initio descriptors”. In:Journal of Cheminformatics14.1 (2022), p. 78.doi:10.1186/s13321-022-00658-9
-
[9]
Machine learning for catalysis informatics: recent applications and prospects
Takashi Toyao et al. “Machine learning for catalysis informatics: recent applications and prospects”. In:Acs Cataly- sis10.3 (2019), pp. 2260–2297.doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b04186
-
[10]
Machine learning identified materials descriptors for ferroelectricity
Jingjin He et al. “Machine learning identified materials descriptors for ferroelectricity”. In:Acta Materialia209 (2021), p. 116815.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116815
-
[11]
Jes´ us Carrete et al. “Finding unprecedentedly low-thermal-conductivity half-Heusler semiconductors via high- throughput materials modeling”. In:Physical Review X4.1 (2014), p. 011019.doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011019
-
[12]
Dilshod Nematov and Mirabbos Hojamberdiev. “Machine learning-driven materials discovery: Unlocking next- generation functional materials – A review”. In:Computational Condensed Matter45 (2025), e01139.issn: 2352- 2143.doi:10.1016/j.cocom.2025.e01139
-
[13]
Stereochemistry of electrocyclic reactions
Robert B Woodward and Roald Hoffmann. “Stereochemistry of electrocyclic reactions”. In:Journal of the American Chemical Society87.2 (1965), pp. 395–397.doi:10.1021/ja01080a054
-
[14]
Goodenough.Magnetism and the Chemical Bond
J.B. Goodenough.Magnetism and the Chemical Bond. Inorganic Chemistry Section / Interscience monographs on chemistry. Interscience Publishers, 1963
work page 1963
-
[15]
Die gesetze der krystallochemie
Victor Moritz Goldschmidt. “Die gesetze der krystallochemie”. In:Naturwissenschaften14.21 (1926), pp. 477–485. doi:10.1007/BF01507527
-
[16]
The principles determining the structure of complex ionic crystals
Linus Pauling. “The principles determining the structure of complex ionic crystals”. In:Journal of the american chemical society51.4 (1929), pp. 1010–1026.doi:10.1021/ja01379a006
-
[17]
Electronic population analysis on LCAO–MO molecular wave functions. I
Robert S Mulliken. “Electronic population analysis on LCAO–MO molecular wave functions. I”. In:The Journal of chemical physics23.10 (1955), pp. 1833–1840.doi:10.1063/1.1740588
-
[18]
Benjamin D Dunnington and JR Schmidt. “Generalization of natural bond orbital analysis to periodic systems: applications to solids and surfaces via plane-wave density functional theory”. In:Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation8.6 (2012), pp. 1902–1911.doi:10.1021/ct300002t
-
[19]
Timur R Galeev et al. “Solid state adaptive natural density partitioning: a tool for deciphering multi-center bond- ing in periodic systems”. In:Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics15.14 (2013), pp. 5022–5029.doi: 10 . 1039 / C3CP50350J
work page 2013
-
[20]
Richard FW Bader and Atoms In Molecules. “A quantum theory”. In:Clarendon: Oxford, UK556 (1990)
work page 1990
-
[21]
Electron localization in solid-state structures of the elements: the diamond structure
Andreas Savin et al. “Electron localization in solid-state structures of the elements: the diamond structure”. In: Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English31.2 (1992), pp. 187–188.doi:10.1002/anie.199201871
-
[22]
PS Bagus et al. “Charge displacement analysis: A new general method to estimate atomic charges in molecules and clusters”. In:Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical119.1-3 (1997), pp. 3–10.doi: 10 . 1016 / S1381 - 1169(97)80041-6
work page 1997
-
[23]
Marc Raupach and Ralf Tonner. “A periodic energy decomposition analysis method for the investigation of chemi- cal bonding in extended systems”. In:The Journal of chemical physics142.19 (2015).doi:10.1063/1.4919943. 10
-
[24]
Energy decomposition analysis for excited states: an extension based on TDDFT
Florian Kreuter and Ralf Tonner-Zech. “Energy decomposition analysis for excited states: an extension based on TDDFT”. In:Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics27.9 (2025), pp. 4728–4745.doi:10.1039/D4CP04207G
-
[25]
Schaefer, Beth Shapiro, and Richard E
Carl-Friedrich Sch¨ on et al. “Classification of properties and their relation to chemical bonding: Essential steps to- ward the inverse design of functional materials”. In:Science Advances8.47 (2022), eade0828.doi: 10.1126/sciadv. ade0828
-
[26]
Programming material properties by tuning intermolecular bond- ing
Upamanyu Ray, Zhenqian Pang, and Teng Li. “Programming material properties by tuning intermolecular bond- ing”. In:Journal of Applied Physics132.21 (2022).doi:10.1063/5.0123058
-
[27]
Zhifang Zhou et al. “Chemical Bonding Engineering: Insights into Physicochemical Performance Optimization for Energy-Storage/Conversion”. In:Accounts of Materials Research5.12 (2024), pp. 1571–1582.doi: https://doi. org/10.1021/accountsmr.4c00243
-
[28]
Antibonding valence states induce low lattice thermal conductivity in metal halide semi- conductors
Mohammad Ubaid et al. “Antibonding valence states induce low lattice thermal conductivity in metal halide semi- conductors”. In:Applied Physics Reviews11.4 (2024).doi:10.1063/5.0227080
-
[29]
Exploiting chemical bonding principles to design high-performance thermoelectric materi- als
Anthony V Powell et al. “Exploiting chemical bonding principles to design high-performance thermoelectric materi- als”. In:Nature Reviews Chemistry(2025), pp. 1–20.doi:10.1038/s41570-025-00695-6
-
[30]
Adaptive machine learning framework to accelerate ab initio molecular dynamics
Venkatesh Botu and Rampi Ramprasad. “Adaptive machine learning framework to accelerate ab initio molecular dynamics”. In:International journal of quantum chemistry115.16 (2015), pp. 1074–1083.doi:10.1002/qua.24836
-
[31]
Statistical analysis of coordination environments in oxides
David Waroquiers et al. “Statistical analysis of coordination environments in oxides”. In:Chemistry of Materials 29.19 (2017), pp. 8346–8360.doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02766
-
[32]
ChemEnv: a fast and robust coordination environment identification tool
David Waroquiers et al. “ChemEnv: a fast and robust coordination environment identification tool”. In:Structural Science76.4 (2020), pp. 683–695.doi:10.1107/S2052520620007994
-
[33]
Physics-inspired structural representations for molecules and materials
Felix Musil et al. “Physics-inspired structural representations for molecules and materials”. In:Chemical Reviews 121.16 (2021), pp. 9759–9815.doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00021
-
[34]
Automated bonding analysis with crystal orbital hamilton populations
Janine George et al. “Automated bonding analysis with crystal orbital hamilton populations”. In:ChemPlusChem 87.11 (2022), e202200123.doi:10.1002/cplu.202200123
-
[35]
Atomate2: Modular workflows for materials science
Alex M Ganose et al. “Atomate2: Modular workflows for materials science”. In:Digital Discovery(2025).doi: 10. 1039/D5DD00019J
work page 2025
-
[36]
A quantum-chemical bonding database for solid-state materials
Aakash Ashok Naik et al. “A quantum-chemical bonding database for solid-state materials”. In:Scientific Data10.1 (2023), p. 610.doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02477-5
-
[37]
Aakash Ashok Naik et al.Quantum-Chemical Bonding Database (Unprocessed data : Part 1). Version v1.0.0. Apr. 2023.doi:10.5281/zenodo.7852083
-
[38]
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Anubhav Jain et al. “Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation”. In:APL materials1.1 (2013).doi:10.1063/1.4812323
-
[39]
Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets
Volker L Deringer, Andrei L Tchougr´ eeff, and Richard Dronskowski. “Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets”. In:The journal of physical chemistry A115.21 (2011), pp. 5461– 5466.doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202489s
-
[40]
Stefan Maintz et al. “Analytic projection from plane-wave and PAW wavefunctions and application to chemical- bonding analysis in solids”. In:Journal of computational chemistry34.29 (2013), pp. 2557–2567.doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/jcc.23424
-
[41]
LOBSTER: A Tool to Extract Chemical Bonding from Plane-Wave Based DFT
Stefan Maintz et al. “LOBSTER: A Tool to Extract Chemical Bonding from Plane-Wave Based DFT”. In:Journal of Computational Chemistry37 (2016), pp. 1030–1035.doi:10.1002/jcc.24300
-
[42]
Ryky Nelson et al. “LOBSTER: Local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional theory”. In:Journal of computational chemistry41.21 (2020), pp. 1931–1940.doi:10.1002/jcc.26353
-
[43]
Chains of trans-edge-sharing molybdenum octahedra: metal-metal bonding in extended systems
Timothy Hughbanks and Roald Hoffmann. “Chains of trans-edge-sharing molybdenum octahedra: metal-metal bonding in extended systems”. In:Journal of the American Chemical Society105.11 (1983), pp. 3528–3537.doi: 10.1021/ja00349a027
-
[44]
Richard Dronskowski and Peter E Bloechl. “Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved vi- sualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry97.33 (1993), pp. 8617–8624.doi:10.1021/j100135a014
-
[45]
Crystal orbital bond index: covalent bond orders in solids
Peter C M¨ uller et al. “Crystal orbital bond index: covalent bond orders in solids”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry C125.14 (2021), pp. 7959–7970.doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00718
-
[46]
Christina Ertural, Simon Steinberg, and Richard Dronskowski. “Development of a robust tool to extract Mulliken and L¨ owdin charges from plane waves and its application to solid-state materials”. In:RSC advances9.51 (2019), pp. 29821–29830.doi:10.1039/C9RA05190B. 11
-
[47]
Electrostatic, Madelung and cohesive energies for solids
MG Trefry, EN Maslen, and MA Spackman. “Electrostatic, Madelung and cohesive energies for solids”. In:Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics20.1 (1987), p. 19.doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/20/1/006
-
[48]
Rudolf Hoppe. “On the Madelung part of lattice energy: New pathways to use it as a tool in solid state chemistry (Part 1)”. In:Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung A50.6 (1995), pp. 555–567.doi:10.1515/zna-1995-0607
-
[49]
LobsterPy: A package to automatically analyze LOBSTER runs
Aakash Ashok Naik et al. “LobsterPy: A package to automatically analyze LOBSTER runs”. In:Journal of Open Source Software9.94 (2024), p. 6286.doi:10.21105/joss.06286
-
[50]
Long-Range Forces in Rock-Salt-Type Tellurides and How they Mirror the Underlying Chemical Bonding
Jan Hempelmann et al. “Long-Range Forces in Rock-Salt-Type Tellurides and How they Mirror the Underlying Chemical Bonding”. In:Advanced Materials33.37 (2021), p. 2100163.doi:10.1002/adma.202100163
-
[51]
Identification of material dimensionality based on force constant analysis
Mohammad Bagheri, Ethan Berger, and Hannu-Pekka Komsa. “Identification of material dimensionality based on force constant analysis”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14.35 (2023), pp. 7840–7847.doi: 10.1021/ acs.jpclett.3c01635
work page 2023
-
[52]
Alexander Dunn et al. “Benchmarking materials property prediction methods: the Matbench test set and Automat- miner reference algorithm”. In:npj Computational Materials6.1 (2020), p. 138.doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-00406- 3
-
[53]
Machine learning assisted prediction of the phonon cutoff frequency of ABO3 perovskite materi- als
Chen Gong et al. “Machine learning assisted prediction of the phonon cutoff frequency of ABO3 perovskite materi- als”. In:Computational Materials Science239 (2024), p. 112943.doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112943
-
[54]
Kostya Trachenko et al. “Upper bounds on the highest phonon frequency and superconducting temperature from fundamental physical constants”. In:Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37.16 (2025), p. 165401.doi: 10.1088/ 1361-648X/adbc39
work page 2025
-
[55]
Thinking like a chemist: intuition in thermoelectric materials
Wolfgang G Zeier et al. “Thinking like a chemist: intuition in thermoelectric materials”. In:Angewandte Chemie International Edition55.24 (2016), pp. 6826–6841.doi:10.1002/anie.201508381
-
[56]
Jiangang He et al. “Accelerated discovery and design of ultralow lattice thermal conductivity materials using chemical bonding principles”. In:Advanced Functional Materials32.14 (2022), p. 2108532.doi: 10 . 1002 / adfm . 202108532
work page 2022
-
[57]
Eleonora Isotta et al. “Elastic moduli: a tool for understanding chemical bonding and thermal transport in thermo- electric materials”. In:Angewandte Chemie135.12 (2023), e202213649.doi:10.1002/ange.202213649
-
[58]
Pierre-Paul De Breuck, Geoffroy Hautier, and Gian-Marco Rignanese. “Materials property prediction for limited datasets enabled by feature selection and joint learning with MODNet”. In:npj computational materials7.1 (2021), p. 83.doi:10.1038/s41524-021-00552-2
-
[59]
Accurate experimental band gap predic- tions with multifidelity correction learning
Pierre-Paul De Breuck, Gr´ egoire Heymans, and Gian-Marco Rignanese. “Accurate experimental band gap predic- tions with multifidelity correction learning”. In:Journal of Materials Informatics2.3 (2022), N–A.doi: 10.20517/ jmi.2022.13
work page 2022
-
[60]
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions”. In:Advances in neural information processing systems30 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[61]
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Scott M Lundberg et al. “From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees”. In:Na- ture machine intelligence2.1 (2020), pp. 56–67.doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9
-
[62]
Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure
Andr´ e Altmann et al. “Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure”. In:Bioinformatics26.10 (2010), pp. 1340–1347.doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134
-
[63]
Runhai Ouyang et al. “SISSO: A compressed-sensing method for identifying the best low-dimensional descrip- tor in an immensity of offered candidates”. In:Physical Review Materials2.8 (2018), p. 083802.doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevMaterials.2.083802
work page 2018
-
[64]
SISSO++: A C++ Implementation of the Sure-Independence Screening and Sparsify- ing Operator Approach
Thomas A. r. Purcell et al. “SISSO++: A C++ Implementation of the Sure-Independence Screening and Sparsify- ing Operator Approach”. In:Journal of Open Source Software7.71 (2022), p. 3960.doi:10.21105/joss.03960
-
[65]
Thomas AR Purcell, Matthias Scheffler, and Luca M Ghiringhelli. “Recent advances in the SISSO method and their implementation in the SISSO++ code”. In:The Journal of Chemical Physics159.11 (2023).doi: 10.1063/5. 0156620
work page doi:10.1063/5 2023
-
[66]
Rog´ erio Almeida Gouvˆ ea et al. “Combining feature-based approaches with graph neural networks and symbolic regression for synergistic performance and interpretability”. In:npj Computational Materials(2026).doi: 10.1038/ s41524-025-01938-2
work page 2026
-
[67]
Pierre-Paul De Breuck, Matthew L Evans, and Gian-Marco Rignanese. “Robust model benchmarking and bias- imbalance in data-driven materials science: a case study on MODNet”. In:Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33.40 (2021), p. 404002.doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ac1280
-
[68]
Inference for the generalization error
Claude Nadeau and Yoshua Bengio. “Inference for the generalization error”. In:Advances in neural information processing systems12 (1999). 12
work page 1999
-
[69]
Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms
Thomas G Dietterich. “Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms”. In:Neural computation10.7 (1998), pp. 1895–1923.doi:10.1162/089976698300017197
-
[70]
Lucas Foppa et al. “Hierarchical symbolic regression for identifying key physical parameters correlated with bulk properties of perovskites”. In:Physical Review Letters129.5 (2022), p. 055301.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129. 055301
-
[71]
Symbolic regression as a feature engineering method for ma- chine and deep learning regression tasks
Assaf Shmuel, Oren Glickman, and Teddy Lazebnik. “Symbolic regression as a feature engineering method for ma- chine and deep learning regression tasks”. In:Machine Learning: Science and Technology5.2 (2024), p. 025065.doi: 10.1088/2632-2153/ad513a
-
[72]
Franziska Zahn et al. “Experimental and Theoretical Force Constants as Meaningful Indicator for Interatomic Bond- ing Characteristics and the Specific Case of Elemental Antimony”. In:Advanced Materials37.7 (2025), p. 2416320. doi:10.1002/adma.202416320
-
[73]
Volker L Deringer et al. “Vibrational properties and bonding nature of Sb2Se3 and their implications for chalco- genide materials”. In:Chemical science6.9 (2015), pp. 5255–5262.doi:10.1039/C5SC00825E
-
[74]
The Orbital Origins of Chemical Bonding in Ge- Sb- Te Phase-Change Materials
Jan Hempelmann et al. “The Orbital Origins of Chemical Bonding in Ge- Sb- Te Phase-Change Materials”. In: Angewandte Chemie International Edition61.17 (2022), e202115778.doi:10.1002/anie.202115778
-
[75]
Bonding hierarchy gives rise to high thermoelectric performance in layered zintl compound baau2p4
Koushik Pal, Jiangang He, and C Wolverton. “Bonding hierarchy gives rise to high thermoelectric performance in layered zintl compound baau2p4”. In:Chemistry of Materials30.21 (2018), pp. 7760–7768.doi: 10 . 1021 / acs . chemmater.8b03130
work page 2018
-
[76]
Bonding heterogeneity in mixed-anion compounds realizes ultralow lattice thermal conductivity
Naoki Sato et al. “Bonding heterogeneity in mixed-anion compounds realizes ultralow lattice thermal conductivity”. In:Journal of Materials Chemistry A9.39 (2021), pp. 22660–22669.doi:10.1039/D1TA04958E
-
[77]
Xin Jin et al. “Bonding heterogeneity leads to hierarchical and ultralow lattice thermal conductivity in sodium metavanadate”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13.48 (2022), pp. 11160–11168.doi: 10.1021/acs. jpclett.2c03061
work page doi:10.1021/acs 2022
-
[78]
Mohammed Al-Fahdi et al. “Accelerated discovery of extreme lattice thermal conductivity by crystal graph atten- tion networks and chemical bonding”. In:npj Computational Materials(2025).doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01871-4
-
[79]
High Lattice Thermal Conductivity Solids
Donald T. Morelli and Glen A. Slack. “High Lattice Thermal Conductivity Solids”. In:High Thermal Conductivity Materials. Springer New York, 2006, pp. 37–68.isbn: 978-0-387-25100-4.doi:10.1007/0-387-25100-6_2
-
[80]
Xinming Wang et al. “Identification of crystalline materials with ultra-low thermal conductivity based on machine learning study”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry C124.16 (2020), pp. 8488–8495.doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc. 9b11610
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.