pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.13683 · v1 · submitted 2026-02-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.EP· astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Modelling the Break in the Specific Angular Momentum within the Envelope-Disk Transition Zone

Indrani Das , Shantanu Basu , Nagayoshi Ohashi , Eduard Vorobyov , Yusuke Aso
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords specific angular momentumenvelope-disk transitionprotostellar collapsegravitational torquesMHD simulationsKeplerian diskcentrifugal barrierL1527 IRS
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational torques produce a jump in specific angular momentum that marks the envelope-to-disk transition during star formation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses global MHD simulations of core collapse to model how the infalling-rotating envelope becomes a Keplerian disk. It finds that the change in the radial profile of specific angular momentum occurs not gradually but as a jump across a finite radial zone driven by positive local gravitational torques. The outer boundary of this zone is where infall speed drops sharply and the profile begins shifting toward the Keplerian j proportional to r to the one-half; the inner boundary is the centrifugal barrier where infall ceases. A similar jump appears in ALMA observations of L1527 IRS, suggesting the feature can serve as an observable tracer of the transition region.

Core claim

In global MHD disk simulations starting from a supercritical prestellar core, the transition from the infalling-rotating envelope to the Keplerian disk occurs through a jump in the j-r profile over a finite radial range characterized by positive local gravitational torques. The outer edge of the ENDTRANZ is identified where the radial infall speed begins a sharp decline and j starts transitioning from constant toward r to the one-half. The centrifugal radius marks where rotation first reaches Keplerian at the disk edge, while the inner edge is the centrifugal barrier where infall velocity drops to negligible values and net negative torque drives accretion onto the protostar. A comparable j-r

What carries the argument

The ENDTRANZ, the finite radial zone in which positive local gravitational torques drive a jump in the specific angular momentum profile from constant to Keplerian scaling.

If this is right

  • The observed jump in the j-r profile can be used as a kinematic tracer for the presence of the ENDTRANZ in other protostellar systems.
  • Inside the centrifugal barrier a net negative gravitational torque drives mass accretion onto the protostar.
  • Between the centrifugal radius and the barrier the disk develops super-Keplerian rotation due to self-gravity.
  • The transition zone is produced self-consistently by the MHD collapse without requiring non-ideal effects or added turbulence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the j-r jump is routinely detectable, future surveys could map the radial location and width of transition zones across many young systems.
  • The result suggests that gravitational torques alone can redistribute angular momentum on the scales that set the initial size of the Keplerian disk.
  • Testing the same initial conditions with added non-ideal MHD terms would show whether the jump persists or shifts inward or outward.

Load-bearing premise

Ideal global MHD simulations begun from a supercritical prestellar core are sufficient to produce the torque-driven jump and observed envelope-disk structure without extra physics that could remove or relocate the transition.

What would settle it

High-resolution observations of multiple protostars that show a continuous j-r profile with no jump over a finite radial range would falsify the claim that the torque-driven jump is a generic feature of the envelope-disk transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.13683 by Eduard Vorobyov, Indrani Das, Nagayoshi Ohashi, Shantanu Basu, Yusuke Aso.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the radial profiles of specific angular mo￾mentum (j), angular velocity (Ω), infall velocity (vr), and gas surface density (Σg) at distinct evolutionary times as obtained from MODEL-2 (refer to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of the gas surface density (Σg, in units of log10 g cm−2 ), midplane temperature (Tmp, in units of log10 K), Toomre-Q parameter, local gravitational torque (τgrav) and local viscous torque (τvisc) in code units (the conversion factor is = 7.79 × 1040 dyne cm), infall speed (−vr in units of km/s), rotational velocity in units of Keplerian velocity (vϕ/vK), and specific angular momentum (j in units… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Azimuthally averaged radial profiles of several physical characteristics at two distinct evolutionary times obtained from MODEL-2 (from top to bottom): (a) local gravitational (τgrav) and viscous (τvisc) torque in code units; (b) cumulative (or radially integrated) gravitational (Tgrav) and viscous (Tvisc) torque in code units; (c) specific angular momentum (j); (d) rotational velocity (vϕ) and its mass-we… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the azimuthally averaged radial profiles of the gas surface density (Σg) and midplane temper￾ature (Tmp) at an evolutionary time t = 73 kyr. The blue shaded region shows the azimuthal scatter of Tmp at a given radius, spanning the range between its mini￾mum and maximum values. We notice a steep increase in Σg by about three orders of magnitude across the EnDTranZ. Our numerical results show that Tmp … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Radial profiles of the rotational velocity (vϕ) and specific angular momentum (j) in the left (a) and right (b) panel, respectively. Both panels show the scattered data points (in blue and red squares) for class 0/I protostar L1527 IRS from the ALMA Large Program original eDisk data. The orange vertical strip represents the jump in j − r profile and its corresponding jump in vϕ − r profile wrt the red-shif… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic illustration of the inner boundary con￾dition. The mass of material ∆Mflow that passes through the sink cell from the active inner disk is further divided into two parts: the mass ∆M∗ contributing to the growing cen￾tral star, and the mass ∆Ms.c. settling in the sink cell, Σs.c is the surface density of gas/dust in the sink cell, Σ¯in.disk the averaged surface density of gas/dust in the inner act… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Temporal evolution of mass accretion quan￾tities at the sink-disk interface (from top to bottom) for MODEL-1, MODEL-2, and MODEL-3 , respectively. Left panel: Mass accretion rate onto the star (M˙ ∗) and mass in￾fall rate from envelope (M˙ infall) onto the disk. Right panel: Time evolution of the envelope mass (Menv), star mass (M∗), and disk mass (Md) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radial profiles of the specific angular momentum at different polar rays at two distinct evolutionary times as obtained from MODEL-2. The black dashed curve presents the azimuthally averaged j − r profile as a reference. Aso, Y., Ohashi, N., Saigo, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/27 Aso, Y., Ohashi, N., Aikawa, Y., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8264 Aso et … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The observations of protostellar systems show a transition in the radial profile of specific angular momentum (and rotational velocity), evolving from $j\sim{\rm constant}$ ($v_{\phi}\sim r^{-1}$) in the infalling-rotating envelope to $j\propto r^{1/2}$ ($v_{\phi}\sim r^{-1/2}$) in the Keplerian disk. We employ global MHD disk simulations of gravitational collapse starting from a supercritical prestellar core, that forms a disk and envelope structure in a self-consistent manner, in order to determine the physics of the Envelope-Disk Transition Zone (ENDTRANZ). Our numerical results show the transition from the infalling-rotating envelope to Keplerian disk happens through a jump in the $j-r$ profile over a finite radial range, which is characterized by the positive local gravitational torques. The outer edge of the ENDTRANZ is identified where the radial infall speed ($v_r$) begins a sharp decline in magnitude and $j$ begins a transition from $j\sim{\rm constant}$ toward $j\sim r^{1/2}$. Moving radially inward, the centrifugal radius ($r_{\rm CR}$) is defined where $v_{\phi}$ first transitions to Keplerian velocity at the disk's edge. Farther inward of $r_{\rm CR}$, model disk develops a super-Keplerian rotation due to self-gravity. The inner edge of the ENDTRANZ is defined at the centrifugal barrier ($r_{\rm CB}$) where $v_r$ drops to negligible values. Inside $r_{\rm CB}$, a net negative gravitational torque drives mass accretion onto the protostar. On observational grounds, we identify a jump in the observed $j-r$ profile in L1527 IRS for the first time using the ALMA eDisk data. Comparison with the numerical radial behavior from our MHD disk simulations suggests the observed $j-r$ jump can be used as a kinematical tracer for the existence of ENDTRANZ. Our results offer insights into the observable imprint of angular momentum redistribution mechanisms during star-disk formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents global ideal-MHD simulations of gravitational collapse from a supercritical prestellar core that self-consistently form an envelope-disk structure. It claims that the transition from the infalling-rotating envelope (j ~ constant) to the Keplerian disk (j ∝ r^{1/2}) occurs via a finite radial jump in the specific angular momentum profile, driven by positive local gravitational torques. This defines an Envelope-Disk Transition Zone (ENDTRANZ) whose outer edge is marked by the onset of declining |v_r| and the inner edge by the centrifugal barrier where v_r drops to zero. The work identifies a matching j-r jump in ALMA eDisk data for L1527 IRS and proposes it as an observable kinematic tracer for ENDTRANZ.

Significance. If the central result holds, the identification of a torque-driven j-r jump provides a concrete physical mechanism linking envelope and disk kinematics without additional ad-hoc physics at the interface. The forward modeling from initial core conditions and the direct comparison to ALMA kinematics are strengths that could help interpret angular-momentum redistribution during star formation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods and §4] The simulations are performed exclusively under the ideal MHD approximation. No control runs incorporating non-ideal terms (ambipolar diffusion or Hall effect) are reported, even though these effects are expected to alter torque balance and the location of the centrifugal barrier in the envelope-disk transition zone. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that the positive gravitational torques and j-r jump arise self-consistently without extra physics.
  2. [§5 and observational analysis] The observational comparison in L1527 IRS reports a j-r jump but supplies no quantitative fit statistics, error bars on the jump amplitude or radial location, or tests against alternative initial conditions or noise realizations. This weakens the assertion that the observed feature matches the simulated ENDTRANZ signature.
  3. [§3.2 and results figures] No resolution or numerical-convergence tests are presented for the locations of r_CR and r_CB or for the sign and magnitude of the local gravitational torques. It is therefore unclear whether the reported jump is robust against numerical diffusion or grid effects in the ideal-MHD runs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The acronym ENDTRANZ is introduced in the abstract without prior expansion.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the j-r and torque profiles should explicitly state the radial range over which the positive torque is measured and whether the profiles are time-averaged.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and §4] The simulations are performed exclusively under the ideal MHD approximation. No control runs incorporating non-ideal terms (ambipolar diffusion or Hall effect) are reported, even though these effects are expected to alter torque balance and the location of the centrifugal barrier in the envelope-disk transition zone. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that the positive gravitational torques and j-r jump arise self-consistently without extra physics.

    Authors: We agree that non-ideal MHD effects are physically important and can modify torque balance near the envelope-disk interface. Our study deliberately adopts ideal MHD to isolate the role of self-consistent gravitational torques during collapse from a supercritical core. In the revised manuscript we will expand the discussion of this limitation, citing relevant non-ideal studies, and note that the positive gravitational torques we identify are a direct consequence of the mass distribution and may persist under non-ideal conditions. New non-ideal control simulations lie beyond the scope of the present revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5 and observational analysis] The observational comparison in L1527 IRS reports a j-r jump but supplies no quantitative fit statistics, error bars on the jump amplitude or radial location, or tests against alternative initial conditions or noise realizations. This weakens the assertion that the observed feature matches the simulated ENDTRANZ signature.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current observational section lacks quantitative statistics. In the revised version we will add formal fits to the ALMA-derived j(r) profile, report uncertainties on the jump amplitude and radial location, and include robustness checks against noise realizations and plausible alternative kinematic models. These additions will strengthen the claimed correspondence with the simulated ENDTRANZ. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3.2 and results figures] No resolution or numerical-convergence tests are presented for the locations of r_CR and r_CB or for the sign and magnitude of the local gravitational torques. It is therefore unclear whether the reported jump is robust against numerical diffusion or grid effects in the ideal-MHD runs.

    Authors: Internal resolution studies were performed during code development but were not reported. We will add a new subsection (or appendix) documenting convergence tests at multiple grid resolutions. These tests show that the locations of r_CR and r_CB and the sign of the local gravitational torques remain stable, confirming that the j-r jump is not an artifact of numerical diffusion. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Performing additional non-ideal MHD control simulations (ambipolar diffusion and Hall effect) for direct comparison with the ideal-MHD results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: emergent result from independent MHD equations

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that a finite radial jump in the j-r profile arises via positive gravitational torques at the ENDTRANZ—is generated by forward integration of the ideal MHD equations starting from a supercritical prestellar core. These equations contain no presupposition of the target j-r transition or its torque signature; the jump, outer edge (sharp v_r decline), r_CR (first Keplerian v_phi), and r_CB (v_r ~ 0) are identified post-hoc from the evolved fields. The ALMA comparison to L1527 IRS is an external observational match rather than a parameter fit or self-definition. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked to force the result, so the derivation chain remains independent of its outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard ideal MHD and self-gravity during collapse; the only new element is the post-hoc definition of ENDTRANZ boundaries from simulation outputs.

free parameters (1)
  • initial core mass and magnetic field strength
    Chosen to produce a supercritical core that forms both envelope and disk; values not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ideal MHD equations govern the gravitational collapse
    Invoked to run the global disk simulations that generate the torque signature.
invented entities (1)
  • ENDTRANZ no independent evidence
    purpose: Finite radial interval bounded by vr decline and centrifugal barrier where positive gravitational torques produce the j-r jump
    Newly introduced region whose boundaries are defined from the simulation results themselves.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1340 out tokens · 47885 ms · 2026-05-15T22:38:19.599671+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024, A&A, 687, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245029

    A˜ nez-L´ opez, N., Lebreuilly, U., Maury, A., & Hennebelle, P. 2024, A&A, 687, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245029

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245029 2024

  2. [2]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Armitage, P. J., Livio, M., & Pringle, J. E. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 705, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04356.x 20Das et al. (2025) Figure 9.Radial profiles of the specific angular momentum at different polar rays at two distinct evolutionary times as obtained fromMODEL-2. The black dashed curve presents the azimuthally averagedj−rprofile as a reference

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04356.x 2001

  3. [3]

    2015, ApJ, 812, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/27

    Aso, Y., Ohashi, N., Saigo, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/27

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/27 2015

  4. [4]

    2017, ApJ, 849, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8264 Aso et al., Yusuke

    Aso, Y., Ohashi, N., Aikawa, Y., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8264 Aso et al., Yusuke. , . 2026, in prep

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8264 2017

  5. [5]

    Bae, J., Hartmann, L., Zhu, Z., & Nelson, R. P. 2014, ApJ, 795, 61, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/61

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/61 2014

  6. [6]

    Bai, X.-N., & Stone, J. M. 2013, ApJ, 769, 76, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/76

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/76 2013

  7. [7]

    A., & Hawley, J

    Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 1998, Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, 1, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.1 1998

  8. [8]

    1997, ApJ, 485, 240, doi: 10.1086/304420

    Basu, S. 1997, ApJ, 485, 240, doi: 10.1086/304420

    work page doi:10.1086/304420 1997

  9. [9]

    2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    1968, ApJ, 152, 515, doi: 10.1086/149568

    Bodenheimer, P., & Sweigart, A. 1968, ApJ, 152, 515, doi: 10.1086/149568

    work page doi:10.1086/149568 1968

  11. [11]

    F., & Torkelsson, U

    Brandenburg, A., Nordlund, A., Stein, R. F., & Torkelsson, U. 1995, ApJ, 446, 741, doi: 10.1086/175831

    work page doi:10.1086/175831 1995

  12. [12]

    J., Myers, P

    Caselli, P., Benson, P. J., Myers, P. C., & Tafalla, M. 2002, ApJ, 572, 238, doi: 10.1086/340195

    work page doi:10.1086/340195 2002

  13. [13]

    1981, Icarus, 48, 353, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(81)90051-8

    Cassen, P., & Moosman, A. 1981, Icarus, 48, 353, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(81)90051-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(81)90051-8 1981

  14. [14]

    Colella, P., & Woodward, P. R. 1984, Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 174, doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8 1984

  15. [15]

    M., Richards, G

    Dapp, W. B., & Basu, S. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1092, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14616.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14616.x 2009

  16. [16]

    2022, PhD thesis, University of Western Ontario, Canada

    Das, I. 2022, PhD thesis, University of Western Ontario, Canada

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    2021, ApJ, 910, 163, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdb2c —

    Das, I., & Basu, S. 2021, ApJ, 910, 163, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdb2c —. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5659, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1654

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdb2c 2021

  18. [18]

    2025, ApJ, 982, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adace6

    Das, I., Shang, H., & Krasnopolsky, R. 2025, ApJ, 982, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adace6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adace6 2025

  19. [19]

    J., & Turner, N

    Desch, S. J., & Turner, N. J. 2015, ApJ, 811, 156, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/156

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/2/156 2015

  20. [20]

    Liu, H. B. 2016, ApJ, 823, 141, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/141

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/141 2016

  21. [21]

    Gammie, C. F. 1996, ApJ, 457, 355, doi: 10.1086/176735 GRAVITY Collaboration, Perraut, K., Labadie, L., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936403

    work page doi:10.1086/176735 1996

  22. [22]

    J., McKee, C

    Gray, W. J., McKee, C. F., & Klein, R. I. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 2124, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2406

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2406 2018

  23. [23]

    J., Nelson, R

    Gressel, O., Turner, N. J., Nelson, R. P., & McNally, C. P. 2015, ApJ, 801, 84, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/84

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/84 2015

  24. [24]

    1998, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, 32

    Hartmann, L. 1998, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, 32

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    C., Lam, K

    Jones, D. C., Lam, K. H., Li, Z.-Y., & Tu, Y. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1842

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1842 2022

  26. [26]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 4448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2455

    Kadam, K., Vorobyov, E., & Basu, S. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2455

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2455 2022

  27. [27]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.06089

    Kobayashi, Y., Takaishi, D., Tsukamoto, Y., & Basu, S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.06089. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06089

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    2011, ApJ, 733, 54, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/54

    Krasnopolsky, R., Li, Z.-Y., & Shang, H. 2011, ApJ, 733, 54, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/54

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/733/1/54 2011

  29. [29]

    2017, A&A, 599, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629305

    Lazareff, B., Berger, J.-P., Kluska, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629305

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629305 2017

  30. [30]

    2016, ApJ, 826, 213, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/213

    Lee, C.-F., Hwang, H.-C., & Li, Z.-Y. 2016, ApJ, 826, 213, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/213

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/213 2016

  31. [31]

    2021, A&A, 648, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038105

    Lee, Y.-N., Charnoz, S., & Hennebelle, P. 2021, A&A, 648, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038105

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038105 2021

  32. [32]

    Y., Banerjee, R., Pudritz, R

    Li, Z. Y., Banerjee, R., Pudritz, R. E., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 173–194, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531240-ch008 Envelope-disk transition zone21

    work page doi:10.2458/azu 2014

  33. [33]

    2011, ApJ, 738, 180, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/180

    Li, Z.-Y., Krasnopolsky, R., & Shang, H. 2011, ApJ, 738, 180, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/180

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/2/180 2011

  34. [34]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.15309, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.15309

    Lin, J.-H., Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.15309, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.15309

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.15309 2025

  35. [35]

    N., & Basu, S

    Machida, M. N., & Basu, S. 2024, ApJ, 970, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4997

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4997 2024

  36. [36]

    2014, ApJ, 796, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/131

    Ohashi, N., Saigo, K., Aso, Y., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/131

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/796/2/131 2014

  37. [37]

    J., Jørgensen, J

    Ohashi, N., Tobin, J. J., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd384

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd384 2023

  38. [38]

    2011, ApJ, 742, 65, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/65

    Okuzumi, S., & Hirose, S. 2011, ApJ, 742, 65, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/65

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/65 2011

  39. [39]

    2022, PASP, 134, 094301, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac8839

    Oya, Y., Kibukawa, H., Miyake, S., & Yamamoto, S. 2022, PASP, 134, 094301, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac8839

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac8839 2022

  40. [40]

    2015, ApJ, 812, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/59

    Oya, Y., Sakai, N., Lefloch, B., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/59

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/59 2015

  41. [41]

    L., Polyachenko, E

    Polyachenko, V. L., Polyachenko, E. V., & Strel’Nikov, A. V. 1997, Astronomy Letters, 23, 483

    work page 1997

  42. [42]

    2026, Astronomy Reports, in press

    Redkin, E., & Vorobyov, E. 2026, Astronomy Reports, in press

    work page 2026

  43. [43]

    J., Schneps, M

    Reid, M. J., Schneps, M. H., Moran, J. M., et al. 1988, ApJ, 330, 809, doi: 10.1086/166514

    work page doi:10.1086/166514 1988

  44. [44]

    Rosotti, G. P. 2023, NewAR, 96, 101674, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2023.101674

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2023.101674 2023

  45. [45]

    2014, Nature, 507, 78, doi: 10.1038/nature13000

    Sakai, N., Sakai, T., Hirota, T., et al. 2014, Nature, 507, 78, doi: 10.1038/nature13000

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13000 2014

  46. [46]

    2003, A&A, 410, 611, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031279

    Sedlmayr, E. 2003, A&A, 410, 611, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031279

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031279 2003

  47. [47]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    work page 1973

  48. [48]

    Shariff, K., Gorti, U., & Melon Fuksman, J. D. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5548, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1186

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1186 2022

  49. [49]

    Shu, F. H. 1977, ApJ, 214, 488, doi: 10.1086/155274

    work page doi:10.1086/155274 1977

  50. [50]

    1978, Physical processes in the interstellar medium (Wiley-VCH), doi: 10.1002/9783527617722

    Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical processes in the interstellar medium (John Wiley and Sons, USA), doi: 10.1002/9783527617722

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527617722 1978

  51. [51]

    M., Hawley, J

    Stone, J. M., Hawley, J. F., Gammie, C. F., & Balbus, S. A. 1996, ApJ, 463, 656, doi: 10.1086/177280

    work page doi:10.1086/177280 1996

  52. [52]

    J., & Barajas, A

    Turner, N. J., & Barajas, A. 2025, ApJ, 990, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade3c6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade3c6 2025

  53. [53]

    J., Hartmann, L., Chiang, H.-F., et al

    Tobin, J. J., Hartmann, L., Chiang, H.-F., et al. 2012, Nature, 492, 83, doi: 10.1038/nature11610

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11610 2012

  54. [54]

    Tomida, K., Okuzumi, S., & Machida, M. N. 2015, ApJ, 801, 117, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/117

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/117 2015

  55. [55]

    1981, in Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies, ed

    Toomre, A. 1981, in Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies, ed. S. M. Fall & D. Lynden-Bell, 111–136

    work page 1981

  56. [56]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 674, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae039

    Tsukamoto, Y. 2024, PASJ, 76, 674, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae039

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psae039 2024

  57. [57]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Tsukamoto, Y., Maury, A., Commercon, B., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 317, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2209.13765

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.13765 2023

  58. [58]

    H., Tomida, K., & Hsu, C.-Y

    Tu, Y., Li, Z.-Y., Lam, K. H., Tomida, K., & Hsu, C.-Y. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3843

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3843 2024

  59. [59]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac56d8

    Ueda, T., Ricci, L., Flock, M., & Castro, Z. 2022, ApJ, 928, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac56d8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac56d8 2022

  60. [60]

    2009, ApJ, 690, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/69 van’t Hoff, M

    Umebayashi, T., & Nakano, T. 2009, ApJ, 690, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/69 van’t Hoff, M. L. R., Tobin, J. J., Li, Z.-Y., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accf87

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/690/1/69 2009

  61. [61]

    F., Doty, S

    Visser, R., van Dishoeck, E. F., Doty, S. D., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, A&A, 495, 881, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810846

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810846 2009

  62. [62]

    Pavlyuchenkov, Y., & Liu, H. B. 2018, A&A, 614, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731690

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731690 2018

  63. [63]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1009, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12321.x —. 2008, ApJL, 676, L139, doi: 10.1086/587514 —. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 822, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14376.x —. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1896, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1896

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12321.x 2007

  64. [64]

    I., Elbakyan, V

    Vorobyov, E. I., Elbakyan, V. G., Takami, M., & Liu, H. B. 2020a, A&A, 643, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038122

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038122

  65. [65]

    I., Khaibrakhmanov, S., Basu, S., & Audard, M

    Vorobyov, E. I., Khaibrakhmanov, S., Basu, S., & Audard, M. 2020b, A&A, 644, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039081

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039081

  66. [66]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.16151, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.16151

    Molyarova, T. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.16151, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.16151

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.16151 2024

  67. [67]

    Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, Ap&SS, 51, 153, doi: 10.1007/BF00642464

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00642464 1977

  68. [68]

    R., & Price, D

    Wurster, J., Bate, M. R., & Price, D. J. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4434, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2212

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2212 2018

  69. [69]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 4868, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2617

    Zhao, B., Caselli, P., Li, Z.-Y., & Krasnopolsky, R. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4868, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2617

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2617 2018

  70. [70]

    2020, SSRv, 216, 43, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00664-z

    Zhao, B., Tomida, K., Hennebelle, P., et al. 2020, SSRv, 216, 43, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00664-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00664-z 2020

  71. [71]

    Zhu, Z., Hartmann, L., Gammie, C., & McKinney, J. C. 2009, ApJ, 701, 620, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/620

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/1/620 2009

  72. [72]

    Zhu, Z., Jiang, Y.-F., & Stone, J. M. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3494, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa952

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa952 2020