pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.15410 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-17 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

pion-rho Mixing as a mechanism for non-monotonic charged pion behavior in magnetic fields

Ziyue Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords pion-rho mixingmagnetic fieldcharged pionNambu-Jona-Lasinio modellattice QCDLandau levelslevel repulsionnon-monotonic spectrum
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pion-rho mixing in magnetic fields produces a turnover in the lowest charged pion energy, matching lattice observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines whether mixing between charged pions and rho mesons induced by strong magnetic fields can account for the non-monotonic energy behavior of charged pions observed in lattice QCD simulations. It derives a near-pole effective action from the SU(2) Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model to describe the mixing of the lowest Landau level pion with the longitudinal rho mode, which share quantum numbers in the magnetic background. The resulting level repulsion is greatly enhanced by the suppression of the rho meson wave-function renormalization near its pole, causing the energy of the lowest mixed state to reach a maximum and then decrease as the field strength grows. This qualitative trend aligns with lattice results, and direct comparison to the full determinant solution confirms the mechanism's robustness, though the exact peak position depends on the scheme used.

Core claim

Using the near-pole effective action from the SU(2)_f Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, the lowest Landau level charged pion mixes with the longitudinally polarized charged rho meson due to shared quantum numbers in a magnetic field. The level repulsion is strongly amplified by the suppression of the rho wave-function renormalization near the pole, leading the lowest mixed mode to develop a turnover as the magnetic field increases and thereby reproducing the qualitative non-monotonic trend reported on the lattice.

What carries the argument

Near-pole effective action from the SU(2)_f Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model describing π-ρ mixing in magnetic fields, with amplified level repulsion from rho wave-function renormalization suppression.

If this is right

  • The lowest mixed mode energy turns over with increasing magnetic field strength.
  • This mixing provides a candidate explanation for non-monotonic charged meson spectra in strong magnetic fields.
  • The mechanism remains robust when compared to the direct solution of the Landau-projected kernel determinant.
  • The quantitative position of the turnover maximum depends on the regularization scheme.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mixing dominates, similar non-monotonic behaviors could appear in neutral pion or other meson channels at sufficiently strong fields.
  • Extensions to finite temperature or density might alter the turnover point and affect heavy-ion collision observables.
  • Precise lattice measurements of rho meson properties near the pole could confirm the renormalization suppression assumed here.

Load-bearing premise

The near-pole effective action derived from the SU(2)_f Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, combined with suppression of the rho wave-function renormalization near the pole, accurately captures the dominant π-ρ mixing dynamics.

What would settle it

Observation of strictly monotonic increase in the lowest charged pion energy with magnetic field strength up to very high values on the lattice, without any turnover, would falsify the proposed mechanism as the primary cause.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.15410 by Ziyue Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The mass eigenvalues of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Unmixed lowest-Landau-level (LLL) energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Wave-function renormalizations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Upper panel: Loop-induced mixing coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Lowest eigenmode of the coupled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate whether magnetic field induced $\pi-\rho$ mixing can explain the non-monotonic behavior of the charged pion reported in lattice QCD. Using a near-pole effective action derived from the SU(2)$_f$ Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model, we show that the lowest Landau level charged pion mixes with the longitudinally polarized charged rho meson, which shares the same quantum numbers in a magnetic background. The resulting level repulsion is strongly amplified by the suppression of the rho wave-function renormalization near the pole. As a consequence, the lowest mixed mode develops a turnover as the magnetic field increases, reproducing the qualitative trend seen on the lattice. Comparison with the direct determinant solution of the Landau-projected kernel shows that the mechanism is robust, although the quantitative location of the maximum remains scheme dependent. These results support $\pi-\rho$ mixing as an important candidate mechanism for charged meson spectra in strong magnetic fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that magnetic-field-induced π-ρ mixing, derived from a near-pole effective action in the SU(2)_f Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, explains the non-monotonic behavior of charged pions observed on the lattice. The lowest Landau level charged pion mixes with the longitudinally polarized charged ρ, producing level repulsion that is strongly amplified by suppression of the ρ wave-function renormalization Z_ρ near the pole; the resulting lowest mixed mode exhibits a turnover with increasing B, qualitatively reproducing the lattice trend. Direct comparison to the determinant of the Landau-projected kernel is presented as evidence of robustness, although the quantitative location of the maximum is acknowledged to be scheme-dependent.

Significance. If the mechanism is confirmed beyond the model, the work supplies a concrete dynamical explanation for lattice results on charged-meson spectra in strong magnetic fields and illustrates how vector-pseudoscalar mixing can dominate in the lowest Landau level. The explicit robustness check against the direct kernel is a methodological strength; however, the dependence on NJL-specific features (fitted vacuum parameters and the near-pole truncation) limits immediate generality to full QCD.

major comments (2)
  1. [near-pole effective action and comparison to direct determinant] The turnover in the lowest mixed mode is driven by the strong suppression of Z_ρ(B) near the pole (extracted from the NJL near-pole effective action). This suppression is model-specific and its survival in full QCD is not independently verified (e.g., via lattice ρ spectral functions or a different regularization). If the suppression is an artifact of the four-fermion interaction or the truncation, the turnover can disappear while mixing remains; this is load-bearing for the central claim and requires either a lattice cross-check or an explicit demonstration that the qualitative trend persists when Z_ρ suppression is removed.
  2. [comparison with direct determinant] The quantitative location of the maximum is reported to be scheme-dependent, yet the paper prioritizes the qualitative trend. The manuscript should specify the range of schemes examined, quantify the variation in the turnover position, and clarify whether any scheme yields a maximum consistent with the lattice value; otherwise the robustness statement is weakened.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the near-pole approximation and list all NJL parameters (coupling, cutoff) together with their vacuum fitting procedure.
  2. Add a brief discussion of the limitations of the SU(2)_f truncation and the neglect of higher Landau levels or other mixing channels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised help clarify the model dependence and the limits of our robustness claims. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The turnover in the lowest mixed mode is driven by the strong suppression of Z_ρ(B) near the pole (extracted from the NJL near-pole effective action). This suppression is model-specific and its survival in full QCD is not independently verified (e.g., via lattice ρ spectral functions or a different regularization). If the suppression is an artifact of the four-fermion interaction or the truncation, the turnover can disappear while mixing remains; this is load-bearing for the central claim and requires either a lattice cross-check or an explicit demonstration that the qualitative trend persists when Z_ρ suppression is removed.

    Authors: We agree that the suppression of Z_ρ near the pole is model-dependent and central to the amplification of the level repulsion in our calculation. To address this directly, we will add to the revised manuscript an explicit demonstration in which Z_ρ is artificially fixed to a constant value (e.g., its vacuum value) while retaining the mixing; this will show that the turnover is substantially weakened or eliminated, confirming the role of the suppression. Although a lattice determination of the ρ wave-function renormalization in a magnetic field lies outside the scope of this NJL-based study, the comparison to the direct determinant of the Landau-projected kernel (which avoids the near-pole truncation) already indicates that the qualitative non-monotonic trend survives beyond the effective-action approximation. We will expand the discussion to make this distinction clearer. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The quantitative location of the maximum is reported to be scheme-dependent, yet the paper prioritizes the qualitative trend. The manuscript should specify the range of schemes examined, quantify the variation in the turnover position, and clarify whether any scheme yields a maximum consistent with the lattice value; otherwise the robustness statement is weakened.

    Authors: We accept that the current presentation of scheme dependence is insufficiently detailed. In the revision we will explicitly list the regularization schemes and parameter sets examined, quantify the variation in the magnetic-field value at which the turnover occurs (reporting the range across schemes), and state that while the precise location of the maximum remains scheme-dependent and does not coincide with the lattice value in every case, the qualitative non-monotonic behavior is reproduced consistently. This will strengthen the robustness statement by separating the existence of the turnover from its quantitative position. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; turnover emerges dynamically from NJL equations

full rationale

The derivation begins with the standard SU(2)_f NJL Lagrangian whose parameters are fixed by vacuum observables. From this the near-pole effective action is obtained by standard functional techniques; the rho wave-function renormalization Z_ρ(B) and the π-ρ mixing vertex are then computed directly from the model's quark-loop integrals in the magnetic background. The level repulsion and resulting turnover of the lowest mixed mode follow as algebraic consequences of these computed quantities. The comparison to the direct determinant of the Landau-projected kernel is an internal consistency test performed inside the identical model and regularization scheme; it does not import external data or self-referential assumptions. Because the non-monotonic behavior is not imposed by hand, not obtained by refitting, and not reduced to a prior self-citation, the chain contains no load-bearing circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the SU(2)_f NJL model whose couplings are fitted to vacuum data and on the near-pole approximation whose validity in magnetic fields is assumed rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (1)
  • NJL coupling constants and cutoff
    Standard NJL parameters fitted to vacuum meson masses and decay constants; required to set the scale of the effective action.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The SU(2)_f Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model provides a valid effective description of meson mixing in strong magnetic fields
    The near-pole effective action is derived from this model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5453 in / 1339 out tokens · 29036 ms · 2026-05-15T22:06:04.954342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mass spectra of charged mesons and the quenching of vector meson condensation via exact phase-space diagonalization

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the NJL model with exact phase-space diagonalization, magnetic catalysis of the chiral condensate quenches the tachyonic instability of the spin-aligned rho+ by driving the 2M threshold above the Zeeman-lowered mas...

  2. Delineating neutral and charged mesons in magnetic fields

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Neutral mesons conserve continuous transverse momenta in magnetic fields while charged mesons exhibit quantized transverse dynamics, with high-spin charged mesons stabilized by cancellation of internal zero-point ener...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Rubinstein

    Dario Grasso and Hector R. Rubinstein. Magnetic fields in the early universe.Phys. Rept., 348:163–266, 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observa- tion.Astron

    Ruth Durrer and Andrii Neronov. Cosmological Mag- netic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observa- tion.Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 21:62, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers.Phys

    Kenta Kiuchi, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Koutarou Kyutoku, Yuichiro Sekiguchi, and Masaru Shibata. Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers.Phys. Rev. D, 92(12):124034, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Skokov, A

    V. Skokov, A. Yu. Illarionov, and V. Toneev. Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 24:5925–5932, 2009

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion colli- sions.Phys

    Wei-Tian Deng and Xu-Guang Huang. Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion colli- sions.Phys. Rev. C, 85:044907, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Kharzeev, Larry D

    Dmitri E. Kharzeev, Larry D. McLerran, and Harmen J. Warringa. The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’. Nucl. Phys. A, 803:227–253, 2008

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Kharzeev and Dam T

    Dmitri E. Kharzeev and Dam T. Son. Testing the chiral magnetic and chiral vortical effects in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:062301, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion collisions.Phys

    Umut Gursoy, Dmitri Kharzeev, and Krishna Rajagopal. Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 89(5):054905, 2014

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy. Di- mensional reduction and catalysis of dynamical symme- try breaking by a magnetic field.Nucl. Phys. B, 462:249– 290, 1996. 8

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    Kharzeev and Ho-Ung Yee

    Dmitri E. Kharzeev and Ho-Ung Yee. Chiral Magnetic Wave.Phys. Rev. D, 83:085007, 2011

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and A. Schafer. QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. D, 86:071502, 2012

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Phase structure of three flavor QCD in external magnetic fields using HISQ fermions.PoS, LATTICE2018:163, 2019

    Akio Tomiya, Heng-Tong Ding, Xiao-Dan Wang, Yu Zhang, Swagato Mukherjee, and Christian Schmidt. Phase structure of three flavor QCD in external magnetic fields using HISQ fermions.PoS, LATTICE2018:163, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endr¨ odi, S. D. Katz, and A. Sch¨ afer. The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields.JHEP, 08:177, 2014

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, M. Constantinou, M. Costa, G. Endrodi, S. D. Katz, H. Panagopoulos, and A. Schafer. Magnetic susceptibility of QCD at zero and at finite temperature from the lattice.Phys. Rev. D, 86:094512, 2012

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Miransky and Igor A

    Vladimir A. Miransky and Igor A. Shovkovy. Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromo- dynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals.Phys. Rept., 576:1–209, 2015

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Magnetic Catalysis Versus Magnetic Inhibition.Phys

    Kenji Fukushima and Yoshimasa Hidaka. Magnetic Catalysis Versus Magnetic Inhibition.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(3):031601, 2013

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Andersen, William R

    Jens O. Andersen, William R. Naylor, and Anders Tran- berg. Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic field: A review.Rev. Mod. Phys., 88:025001, 2016

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer, and K. K. Szabo. The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields.JHEP, 02:044, 2012

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    E. M. Ilgenfritz, M. Muller-Preussker, B. Petersson, and A. Schreiber. Magnetic catalysis (and inverse catalysis) at finite temperature in two-color lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 89(5):054512, 2014

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang, and Y. Zhang. Chiral properties of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strong magnetic fields at zero temperature.Phys. Rev. D, 104(1):014505, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Meson masses in external magnetic fields with HISQ fermions.PoS, LAT- TICE2019:250, 2020

    Heng-Tong Ding, Sheng-Tai Li, Swagato Mukherjee, Akio Tomiya, and Xiao-Dan Wang. Meson masses in external magnetic fields with HISQ fermions.PoS, LAT- TICE2019:250, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Chiral Properties of (2+1)-Flavor QCD in Magnetic Fields at Zero Tempera- ture

    Heng-Tong Ding and Dan Zhang. Chiral Properties of (2+1)-Flavor QCD in Magnetic Fields at Zero Tempera- ture. 1 2026

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Four fermion interaction model in a constant magnetic field at finite temperature and chemical potential.Prog

    Tomohiro Inagaki, Daiji Kimura, and Tsukasa Murata. Four fermion interaction model in a constant magnetic field at finite temperature and chemical potential.Prog. Theor. Phys., 111:371–386, 2004

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    In- verse Magnetic Catalysis in the three-flavor NJL model with axial-vector interaction.Phys

    Lang Yu, Jos Van Doorsselaere, and Mei Huang. In- verse Magnetic Catalysis in the three-flavor NJL model with axial-vector interaction.Phys. Rev. D, 91(7):074011, 2015

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Fayazbakhsh and N

    Sh. Fayazbakhsh and N. Sadooghi. Anomalous magnetic moment of hot quarks, inverse magnetic catalysis, and reentrance of the chiral symmetry broken phase.Phys. Rev. D, 90(10):105030, 2014

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Coppola, D

    M. Coppola, D. G´ omez Dumm, and N. N. Scoccola. Charged pion masses under strong magnetic fields in the NJL model.Phys. Lett. B, 782:155–161, 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Coppola, D

    M. Coppola, D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola. Neutral and charged pion properties under strong magnetic fields in the NJL model.Phys. Rev. D, 100(5):054014, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the phase structure and mesonic properties in the NJL model.Phys

    Nilanjan Chaudhuri, Snigdha Ghosh, Sourav Sarkar, and Pradip Roy. Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the phase structure and mesonic properties in the NJL model.Phys. Rev. D, 99(11):116025, 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Chiral dy- namics in a magnetic field from the functional renormal- ization group.JHEP, 03:009, 2014

    Kazuhiko Kamikado and Takuya Kanazawa. Chiral dy- namics in a magnetic field from the functional renormal- ization group.JHEP, 03:009, 2014

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Kiminad A. Mamo. Inverse magnetic catalysis in holo- graphic models of QCD.JHEP, 05:121, 2015

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Inverse Magnetic Catalysis in the Soft-Wall Model of AdS/QCD.JHEP, 02:030, 2017

    Danning Li, Mei Huang, Yi Yang, and Pei-Hung Yuan. Inverse Magnetic Catalysis in the Soft-Wall Model of AdS/QCD.JHEP, 02:030, 2017

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Charged and neu- tral vectorρmesons in a magnetic field.Phys

    Hao Liu, Lang Yu, and Mei Huang. Charged and neu- tral vectorρmesons in a magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 91(1):014017, 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Spectral properties ofρ meson in a magnetic field.Phys

    Snigdha Ghosh, Arghya Mukherjee, Mahatsab Mandal, Sourav Sarkar, and Pradip Roy. Spectral properties ofρ meson in a magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 94(9):094043, 2016

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Vector me- son masses from a hidden local symmetry in a constant magnetic field.Phys

    Mamiya Kawaguchi and Shinya Matsuzaki. Vector me- son masses from a hidden local symmetry in a constant magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 93(12):125027, 2016

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Avancini, M´ aximo Coppola, Norberto N

    Sidney S. Avancini, M´ aximo Coppola, Norberto N. Scoc- cola, and Joana C. Sodr´ e. Light pseudoscalar me- son masses under strong magnetic fields within the SU(3) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model.Phys. Rev. D, 104(9):094040, 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    J. P. Carlomagno, D. Gomez Dumm, M. F. Izzo Vil- lafa˜ ne, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola. Charged pseudoscalar and vector meson masses in strong mag- netic fields in an extended NJL model.Phys. Rev. D, 106(9):094035, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Scoccola

    M´ aximo Coppola, Daniel Gomez Dumm, Santiago Noguera, and Norberto N. Scoccola. Masses of magne- tized pseudoscalar and vector mesons in an extended NJL model: The role of axial vector mesons.Phys. Rev. D, 109(5):054014, 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Functional renormalization group study of neutral and charged pions in magnetic fields in the quark-meson model.Phys

    Rui Wen, Shi Yin, Wei-jie Fu, and Mei Huang. Functional renormalization group study of neutral and charged pions in magnetic fields in the quark-meson model.Phys. Rev. D, 108(7):076020, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Inverse magnetic catalysis effect and current quark mass effect on mass spectra and Mott transitions of pions under external magnetic field

    Luyang Li and Shijun Mao. Inverse magnetic catalysis effect and current quark mass effect on mass spectra and Mott transitions of pions under external magnetic field. Phys. Rev. D, 108(5):054001, 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    S. P. Klevansky. The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics.Rev. Mod. Phys., 64:649–708, 1992

    work page 1992

  41. [41]

    QCD phenomenol- ogy based on a chiral effective Lagrangian.Phys

    Tetsuo Hatsuda and Teiji Kunihiro. QCD phenomenol- ogy based on a chiral effective Lagrangian.Phys. Rept., 247:221–367, 1994

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    Vogl and W

    U. Vogl and W. Weise. The Nambu and Jona Lasinio model: Its implications for hadrons and nuclei.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 27:195–272, 1991

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    Schwinger

    Julian S. Schwinger. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization.Phys. Rev., 82:664–679, 1951

    work page 1951