pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15897 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat· hep-th· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Delineating neutral and charged mesons in magnetic fields

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-lathep-thnucl-th
keywords mesonschargedneutralmagneticspinsangularenergyfields
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutral mesons conserve continuous transverse momenta in magnetic fields while charged mesons exhibit quantized transverse dynamics, with high-spin charged mesons stabilized by cancellation of internal zero-point energy against orbital Zeeman energy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Mesons are bound states of a quark and an antiquark. The authors apply a simple model in which the binding force acts like a spring (harmonic oscillator) and separate the overall motion of the meson from the internal motion between the quark and antiquark. In a magnetic field, neutral mesons (zero net charge) keep their sideways momentum continuous and conserved. Charged mesons, however, have their sideways motion broken into discrete energy levels, similar to electrons in atoms. The model also tracks how the intrinsic spins of the quarks and their orbital motion around each other respond to the field (Zeeman splitting). For charged mesons carrying high total spin, the energy cost from the quarks jiggling inside the meson exactly offsets the energy gain from the orbital motion in the field. This balance keeps the high-spin states energetically stable. In the strongest fields the system effectively behaves as if it lives in fewer spatial dimensions.

Core claim

for charged mesons with spins s≥1, we discuss how the zero-point energy in the internal quark motion cancels the Zeeman energy from the orbital angular momentum, ensuring the energetic stability of mesons with high spins.

Load-bearing premise

The non-relativistic quark model with harmonic-oscillator confining potential remains valid from weak to strong magnetic fields, with short-range correlations treated only as perturbations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15897 by Sakura Itatani, Toru Kojo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the Zeeman splitting for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Magnetic field dependence of the ground state en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The ground-state energies for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In the limit of eρ = 0 (see Sec. V B), we have already seen the center-of-mass motion with the energy cost ∼ |B|/M, and two orbital angular motions with the magnetic moments parallel and anti-parallel to the mag￾netic field, with the energy cost of ∼ |B|/M and ∼ λ/|B|, respectively. The small energy in the latter is the conse￾quence of the orbital Zeeman energy that tends to cancel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Magnetic field dependence of the ground state ener [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Ground-state energy levels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the properties of neutral and charged mesons in magnetic fields, from weak-field to strong-field regimes. To develop analytic insights, we employ a non-relativistic quark model with a confining potential of the harmonic oscillator type. Short-range correlations, such as Coulomb and color-magnetic interactions, are treated as perturbations. In particular, we focus on the magnetic field dependence of the relative and the center-of-mass motions. The qualitative trends differ significantly between neutral and charged mesons: for neutral mesons, the transverse momenta are conserved and continuous, while charged mesons exhibit quantized transverse dynamics. The Zeeman effects, arising from intrinsic spins and orbital angular momenta, are carefully examined. In particular, for charged mesons with spins $s\ge 1$, we discuss how the zero-point energy in the internal quark motion cancels the Zeeman energy from the orbital angular momentum, ensuring the energetic stability of mesons with high spins. The effectively reduced dimensionality of these mesons in the strong-field limit is also discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript employs a non-relativistic quark model with harmonic-oscillator confinement (short-range Coulomb and color-magnetic terms treated as perturbations) to analyze neutral and charged mesons in magnetic fields from weak to strong regimes. It contrasts continuous transverse momenta for neutral mesons with Landau-quantized center-of-mass motion for charged mesons, examines Zeeman contributions from intrinsic spins and orbital angular momentum, and derives a cancellation between the zero-point energy of the internal relative motion and the orbital Zeeman term for charged mesons with s ≥ 1, which is argued to guarantee energetic stability of high-spin states. The effective reduction to lower dimensionality in the strong-field limit is also discussed.

Significance. If the model assumptions hold, the work supplies transparent analytic expressions for qualitative trends in meson energies and stability under magnetic fields, which are relevant to heavy-ion collision environments. The explicit cancellation mechanism for high-spin charged mesons is a clear, model-internal result that could guide further study. The paper's strength is its fully analytic treatment of center-of-mass versus relative coordinates, which avoids numerical diagonalization and makes the origin of the reported cancellation explicit.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on Zeeman effects for charged mesons with s≥1] The central stability claim for charged mesons with s ≥ 1 rests on the exact cancellation between the zero-point energy of the relative-motion oscillator and the orbital Zeeman term. This cancellation is derived under the assumption that the harmonic-oscillator frequency remains field-independent and that non-relativistic kinematics apply when the cyclotron energy ħω_c = eB/μ becomes comparable to or exceeds the constituent quark masses; neither assumption is justified or tested in the strong-field regime where the cancellation is most emphasized.
  2. [Abstract and strong-field limit discussion] The manuscript provides no quantitative error estimates, parameter scans, or comparisons to lattice QCD data on meson masses or magnetic moments in external fields, even though the abstract claims to cover the transition from weak to strong regimes. Without such anchors, it is impossible to assess how far the reported qualitative trends survive beyond the specific harmonic-oscillator choice.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model setup] The notation for the reduced mass μ, oscillator frequency ω, and the decomposition into center-of-mass and relative coordinates should be collected in a single early section or table for clarity.
  2. [Introduction or conclusions] A short paragraph contrasting the present non-relativistic results with existing relativistic or lattice studies of mesons in magnetic fields would help readers gauge the domain of applicability.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the non-relativistic limit and harmonic-oscillator confinement being adequate across field strengths, with short-range forces as small corrections.

free parameters (1)
  • harmonic oscillator frequency
    Sets the scale of the confining potential and is a free model parameter.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic treatment of quark motion remains valid in strong magnetic fields
    Invoked to separate center-of-mass and relative coordinates and to apply Zeeman analysis.
  • domain assumption Short-range Coulomb and color-magnetic interactions can be treated perturbatively
    Stated in the abstract as the method for handling residual forces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1337 out tokens · 34870 ms · 2026-05-10T08:35:40.373017+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mass spectra of charged mesons and the quenching of vector meson condensation via exact phase-space diagonalization

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the NJL model with exact phase-space diagonalization, magnetic catalysis of the chiral condensate quenches the tachyonic instability of the spin-aligned rho+ by driving the 2M threshold above the Zeeman-lowered mas...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In fact, the model de- pendencelargelyappearsfromthetreatmentoftheshort- range correlations

    Color-electric interaction The color-electric interaction is VE(r) =− 4 3 αs r .(18) At strong magnetic fields,eB≫Λ 2 QCD, actually the de- tails of short-range interactions become more important than the long-range interactions. In fact, the model de- pendencelargelyappearsfromthetreatmentoftheshort- range correlations. 4 As we discuss later, we evaluate...

  2. [2]

    In momentum space, its Fourier transform leads to∼e−q2/Λ2 UV, cutting off the momenta beyondΛUV

    Color-magnetic interaction The traditional form of the color-magnetic interaction takes the form V trad M (r) = 32παs 9m1m2 ˜δ(r)σ 1 ·σ 2 ,(24) where the ˜δ(r)can be the usualδ-function or a strongly localized function such as∼e −Λ2 UVr2 . In momentum space, its Fourier transform leads to∼e−q2/Λ2 UV, cutting off the momenta beyondΛUV. Since the expression...

  3. [3]

    A smallerc B yields more mass reduction

    The colored bands represent the uncertainty originating from the scale parametercB ∈[0.5,2.0], where the solid lines denote the central value,cB = 1.0. A smallerc B yields more mass reduction. For comparison, the results for a constant coupling (corresponding toc B = 0) are indicated with the dotted curves. 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 K [GeV] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 ...

  4. [4]

    Eigenfrequencies First we defineX= (ρ x, ρy, Ry, px ρ, py ρ, P y R)and write the Hamiltonian as Heff ⊥ = 1 2 XiAijXj , A ij =A ji .(89) The commutation relations forX’s are [Xi, Xj] = iJij , J= " 0I 3 −I3 0 # ,(90) whereJis the fundamental symplectic matrix. Our goal is to convert the Hamiltonian into the form Heff ⊥ = 3X α=1 ωα b† αbα + 1 2 ,(91) with th...

  5. [5]

    The form of the solution is ⟨x|0⊥⟩=N ⊥ exp − 1 2 xαMαβxβ ,(99) where the matrixMcan be computed as Mαβ = i g−1f αβ ,(100) with the normalization constant isN ⊥ = p detM/π 3

    Wavefunctions To find the ground state wavefunctions for the trans- verse Hamiltonian, we look for the state such that bα|0⊥⟩=T −1 αi Xi|0⊥⟩= 0,(α= 1,2,3).(97) Writingx α = (ρ⊥, Ry)andp α = (pρ, P y R), this takes the form 3X β=1 fαβxβ +g αβ pβ |0⊥⟩= 0,(98) wheref αβ =T −1 αβ andg αβ =T −1 α,β+3 are 3×3 matrices. The form of the solution is ⟨x|0⊥⟩=N ⊥ exp...

  6. [6]

    Matrix elements In our computations of the matrix elements, we eval- uate the expectation values of functions independent of Ry. The electric potential is (N⊥ z =N nz=0N⊥) ⟨VE⟩gs =|N ⊥ z |2|NR|2 Z Ry,r VE(r) e−xαMαβ xβ − Λ2 2 z2 =− 4αs 3 |N ⊥ z |2 Z r e−ρ⊥ a Σabρ⊥ b − Λ2 2 z2 r ,(101) where integratingR y renormalizes the matrix forρ⊥, Σab =M ab − MRaMRb ...

  7. [7]

    We begin with the eigenfrequenciesω α (α= 1,2,3) of the transverse HamiltonianH eff ⊥ , see Eq

    Spectra Now we examine numerical results for the ground state spectra foru ¯dandu¯smesons. We begin with the eigenfrequenciesω α (α= 1,2,3) of the transverse HamiltonianH eff ⊥ , see Eq. (91) and Fig. 5. In the limit ofe ρ = 0(see Sec. VB), we have already seen the center-of-mass motion with the energy cost∼ |B|/M, and two orbital angular motions with the...

  8. [8]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A803, 227 (2008), arXiv:0711.0950 [hep-ph]

  9. [9]

    Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions

    V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov, and V. Toneev, Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24, 5925 (2009), arXiv:0907.1396 [nucl-th]

  10. [10]

    W.-T.DengandX.-G.Huang,Event-by-eventgeneration of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C85, 044907 (2012), arXiv:1201.5108 [nucl-th]

  11. [11]

    The Chiral Magnetic Effect

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, The Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. D78, 074033 (2008), arXiv:0808.3382 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    R. C. Duncan and C. Thompson, Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - implications for gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J. Lett.392, L9 (1992)

  13. [13]

    Chakrabarty, Quark matter in strong magnetic field, Phys

    S. Chakrabarty, Quark matter in strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D54, 1306 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9603406

  14. [14]

    E. J. Ferrer, V. de la Incera, and C. Manuel, Magnetic color flavor locking phase in high density QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 152002 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0503162

  15. [15]

    Gyory and V

    W. Gyory and V. de la Incera, Phase transitions and resilience of the magnetic dual chiral density wave phase at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D106, 016011 (2022), arXiv:2203.14209 [nucl-th]

  16. [16]

    E. J. Ferrer and V. de la Incera, Magnetic Dual Chi- ral Density Wave: A Candidate Quark Matter Phase for the Interior of Neutron Stars, Universe7, 458 (2021), arXiv:2201.04032 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    E. J. Ferrer and V. de la Incera, Novel Topological Effects in Dense QCD in a Magnetic Field, Nucl. Phys. B931, 192 (2018), arXiv:1512.03972 [nucl-th]

  18. [18]

    Adhikari, M

    P. Adhikariet al., Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.146, 104199 (2026), arXiv:2412.18632 [nucl-th]

  19. [19]

    Hattori and X.-G

    K. Hattori and X.-G. Huang, Novel quantum phenomena induced by strong magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Sci. Tech.28, 26 (2017), arXiv:1609.00747 [nucl- th]

  20. [20]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. A. Voloshin, and G. Wang, Chiral magnetic and vortical effects in high-energy nu- clear collisions—A status report, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 88, 1 (2016), arXiv:1511.04050 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Quantum field the- ory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rept.576, 1 (2015), arXiv:1503.00732 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    J. O. Andersen, W. R. Naylor, and A. Tranberg, Phase diagramofQCDinamagneticfield: Areview,Rev.Mod. Phys.88, 025001 (2016), arXiv:1411.7176 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    Iwasaki, M

    S. Iwasaki, M. Oka, and K. Suzuki, A review of quarkonia under strong magnetic fields, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 222 (2021), arXiv:2104.13990 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Magnetic catalysis and anisotropic confinement in QCD, Phys. Rev. D66, 045006 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0205348

  25. [25]

    V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, Di- mensional reduction and catalysis of dynamical symme- try breaking by a magnetic field, Nucl. Phys. B462, 249 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9509320

  26. [26]

    Endr ˝odi, QCD equation of state at nonzero magnetic fields in the Hadron Resonance Gas model, JHEP 04 (2013) 023, doi:10.1007/ JHEP04(2013)023,1301.1307

    G. Endrödi, QCD equation of state at nonzero magnetic fields in the Hadron Resonance Gas model, JHEP04, 023, arXiv:1301.1307 [hep-ph]

  27. [27]

    Fukushima and Y

    K. Fukushima and Y. Hidaka, Magnetic Catalysis Ver- sus Magnetic Inhibition, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 031601 (2013), arXiv:1209.1319 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    Kojo and N

    T. Kojo and N. Su, The quark mass gap in a magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B720, 192 (2013), arXiv:1211.7318 [hep-ph]

  29. [29]

    Kojo and N

    T. Kojo and N. Su, A renormalization group approach for QCD in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B726, 839 (2013), arXiv:1305.4510 [hep-ph]

  30. [30]

    Kojo and N

    T. Kojo and N. Su, The quark mass gap in strong magnetic fields, Nucl. Phys. A931, 763 (2014), arXiv:1407.7925 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    Hattori, T

    K. Hattori, T. Kojo, and N. Su, Mesons in strong mag- netic fields: (I) General analyses, Nucl. Phys. A951, 1 (2016), arXiv:1512.07361 [hep-ph]. 17

  32. [32]

    Kojo, Neutral and charged mesons in magnetic fields: A resonance gas in a non-relativistic quark model, Eur

    T. Kojo, Neutral and charged mesons in magnetic fields: A resonance gas in a non-relativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 317 (2021), arXiv:2104.00376 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    A. J. Arifi and K. Suzuki, Structure of heavy quarkonia in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D112, 094013 (2025), arXiv:2507.18894 [hep-ph]

  34. [34]

    Alford and M

    J. Alford and M. Strickland, Charmonia and Bottomonia in a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. D88, 105017 (2013), arXiv:1309.3003 [hep-ph]

  35. [35]

    E. S. Fraga, J. Noronha, and L. F. Palhares, LargeNc Deconfinement Transition in the Presence of a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. D87, 114014 (2013), arXiv:1207.7094 [hep-ph]

  36. [36]

    E. S. Fraga and L. F. Palhares, Deconfinement in the presence of a strong magnetic background: an exercise within the MIT bag model, Phys. Rev. D86, 016008 (2012), arXiv:1201.5881 [hep-ph]

  37. [37]

    Ebert and K

    D. Ebert and K. G. Klimenko, Quark droplets stability induced by external magnetic field, Nucl. Phys. A728, 203 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305149

  38. [38]

    I. A. Shushpanov and A. V. Smilga, Quark conden- sate in a magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B402, 351 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703201

  39. [39]

    Cao, Recent progresses on QCD phases in a strong magnetic field: views from Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model, Eur

    G. Cao, Recent progresses on QCD phases in a strong magnetic field: views from Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 264 (2021), arXiv:2103.00456 [hep- ph]

  40. [40]

    Braun, W

    J. Braun, W. A. Mian, and S. Rechenberger, Delayed Magnetic Catalysis, Phys. Lett. B755, 265 (2016), arXiv:1412.6025 [hep-ph]

  41. [41]

    Mueller and J

    N. Mueller and J. M. Pawlowski, Magnetic catalysis and inverse magnetic catalysis in QCD, Phys. Rev. D91, 116010 (2015), arXiv:1502.08011 [hep-ph]

  42. [42]

    Mueller, J

    N. Mueller, J. A. Bonnet, and C. S. Fischer, Dynamical quarkmassgenerationinastrongexternalmagneticfield, Phys. Rev. D89, 094023 (2014), arXiv:1401.1647 [hep- ph]

  43. [43]

    Z.Wang,Residue-EnhancedPion-RhoMixingastheOri- gin of Nonmonotonic Charged Pion Mass in Magnetic Fields, (2026), arXiv:2602.15410 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    J. Mei, R. Wen, M. Zhou, S. Mao, and M. Huang, Spectral function for pions in magnetic field, (2026), arXiv:2601.22422 [hep-ph]

  45. [45]

    J. Mei, R. Wen, S. Mao, M. Huang, and K. Xu, Magnetic catalysis and diamagnetism from pion fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D110, 034024 (2024), arXiv:2402.19193 [hep-ph]

  46. [46]

    J. Mei, T. Xia, and S. Mao, Mass spectra of neu- tral mesons K0,π0,η,η’ at finite magnetic field, tem- perature and quark chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074018 (2023), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 119901 (2024)], arXiv:2212.04778 [hep-ph]

  47. [47]

    Mao, Pions in magnetic field at finite temperature, Phys

    S. Mao, Pions in magnetic field at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D99, 056005 (2019), arXiv:1808.10242 [nucl- th]

  48. [48]

    M. A. Andreichikov and Y. A. Simonov, Chiral physics in the magnetic field with quark confinement contribution, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 902 (2018), arXiv:1805.11896 [hep- ph]

  49. [49]

    M. A. Andreichikov, B. O. Kerbikov, E. V. Luschevskaya, Y. A. Simonov, and O. E. Solovjeva, The Evolution of Meson Masses in a Strong Magnetic Field, JHEP05, 007, arXiv:1610.06887 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Y. A. Simonov, Magnetic confinement and the Linde problem, Phys. Rev. D96, 096002 (2017), arXiv:1605.07060 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Ding and D

    H.-T. Ding and D. Zhang, Chiral Properties of(2+1)- Flavor QCD in Magnetic Fields at Zero Temperature, (2026), arXiv:2601.18354 [hep-lat]

  52. [52]

    Ding, J.-B

    H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, A. Kumar, S.-T. Li, and J.-H. Liu, Baryon Electric Charge Correlation as a Magne- tometer of QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 201903 (2024), arXiv:2312.08860 [hep-lat]

  53. [53]

    H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, Q. Shi, and X. D. Wang, Fluc- tuations and correlations of net baryon number, electric charge and strangeness in a background magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 202 (2021), arXiv:2104.06843 [hep- lat]

  54. [54]

    H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Chiral properties of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strong magnetic fields at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. D104, 014505 (2021), arXiv:2008.00493 [hep-lat]

  55. [55]

    Endrodi, M

    G. Endrodi, M. Giordano, S. D. Katz, T. G. Kovács, and F. Pittler, Magnetic catalysis and inverse catalysis for heavy pions, JHEP07, 007, arXiv:1904.10296 [hep-lat]

  56. [56]

    G. S. Bali, B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, and B. Gläßle, Meson masses in electromagnetic fields with Wil- son fermions, Phys. Rev. D97, 034505 (2018), arXiv:1707.05600 [hep-lat]

  57. [57]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrödi, S. D. Katz, and A. Schäfer, The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields, JHEP08, 177, arXiv:1406.0269 [hep-lat]

  58. [58]

    Bruckmann, G

    F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, and T. G. Kovacs, Inverse magnetic catalysis and the Polyakov loop, JHEP04, 112, arXiv:1303.3972 [hep-lat]

  59. [59]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and A. Schafer, QCD quark condensate in exter- nal magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D86, 071502 (2012), arXiv:1206.4205 [hep-lat]

  60. [60]

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer, and K. K. Szabo, The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, JHEP02, 044, arXiv:1111.4956 [hep-lat]

  61. [61]

    Endrodi, Critical point in the QCD phase diagram for extremely strong background magnetic fields, JHEP07, 173, arXiv:1504.08280 [hep-lat]

    G. Endrodi, Critical point in the QCD phase diagram for extremely strong background magnetic fields, JHEP07, 173, arXiv:1504.08280 [hep-lat]

  62. [62]

    D’Elia, L

    M. D’Elia, L. Maio, F. Sanfilippo, and A. Stanzione, Confining and chiral properties of QCD in extremely strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D104, 114512 (2021), arXiv:2109.07456 [hep-lat]

  63. [63]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, A. Rucci, and F. Sanfilippo, Magnetic field effects on the static quark potential at zero and finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D94, 094007 (2016), arXiv:1607.08160 [hep- lat]

  64. [64]

    V. G. Bornyakov, P. V. Buividovich, N. Cundy, O. A. Kochetkov, and A. Schäfer, Deconfinement transition in two-flavor lattice QCD with dynamical overlap fermions in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D90, 034501 (2014), arXiv:1312.5628 [hep-lat]

  65. [65]

    Hidaka and A

    Y. Hidaka and A. Yamamoto, Charged vector mesons in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D87, 094502 (2013), arXiv:1209.0007 [hep-ph]

  66. [66]

    Hattori and A

    K. Hattori and A. Yamamoto, Meson deformation by magnetic fields in lattice QCD, PTEP2019, 043B04 (2019), arXiv:1901.10182 [hep-lat]

  67. [67]

    Coppola, D

    M. Coppola, D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola, Masses of magnetized pseudoscalar and vec- tor mesons in an extended NJL model: The role of ax- 18 ial vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D109, 054014 (2024), arXiv:2312.16675 [hep-ph]

  68. [68]

    Gomez Dumm, S

    D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola, Charged meson masses under strong magnetic fields: Gauge invariance and Schwinger phases, Phys. Rev. D 108, 016012 (2023), arXiv:2306.04128 [hep-ph]

  69. [69]

    J. P. Carlomagno, D. Gomez Dumm, M. F. I. Villafañe, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola, Charged pseudoscalar and vector meson masses in strong magnetic fields in an extended NJL model, Phys. Rev. D106, 094035 (2022), arXiv:2209.10679 [hep-ph]

  70. [70]

    J. P. Carlomagno, D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola, Neutral pseudoscalar and vector meson masses under strong magnetic fields in an extended NJL model: Mixing effects, Phys. Rev. D106, 074002 (2022), arXiv:2205.15928 [hep-ph]

  71. [71]

    Coppola, D

    M. Coppola, D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola, Neutral and charged pion properties under strong magnetic fields in the NJL model, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054014 (2019), arXiv:1907.05840 [hep-ph]

  72. [72]

    Isgur and G

    N. Isgur and G. Karl, Ground State Baryons in a Quark Model with Hyperfine Interactions, Phys. Rev. D20, 1191 (1979)

  73. [73]

    De Rujula, H

    A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Hadron Masses in a Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D12, 147 (1975)

  74. [74]

    A. D. Sakharov, Mass Formula for Mesons and Baryons, Sov. Phys. JETP51, 1059 (1980)

  75. [75]

    Y. B. Zeldovich and A. D. Sakharov, Mass formulas for mesons and baryons in the quark model, Acta Phys. Hung.22, 153 (1967)

  76. [76]

    Y. A. Simonov and M. A. Trusov, Confinement andαs in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B747, 48 (2015), arXiv:1503.08531 [hep-ph]

  77. [77]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D32, 189 (1985)

  78. [78]

    Capstick and N

    S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D34, 2809 (1986)

  79. [79]

    Cao and S

    G. Cao and S. Wu, Single-flavor heavy baryons in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D112, 074034 (2025), arXiv:2507.20636 [nucl-th]

  80. [80]

    A. Deur, S. J. Brodsky, and G. F. de Teramond, The QCD Running Coupling, Nucl. Phys.90, 1 (2016), arXiv:1604.08082 [hep-ph]