Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 3 cited by

Non-Hermitian physics is moving from single-particle linear models into interacting many-body systems, where interactions and nonlinearity create new topology, skin effects, chaos signatures, and dissipative phases.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 21:46 UTC pith:PODSUMNE

load-bearing objection Solid selective roadmap of interacting/nonlinear non-Hermitian physics; no new theorems, but clear origins section and honest flags on post-selection and open debates make it useful for the subfield.

arxiv 2603.13526 v1 pith:PODSUMNE submitted 2026-03-13 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

Perspective: Interactions and Nonlinearity in Non-Hermitian Physics

Federico Roccati , Federico Balducci This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords non-Hermitian physicsopen quantum systemsexceptional pointsnon-Hermitian skin effectmany-body localizationdissipative quantum chaosmeasurement-induced transitionsnonlinearity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This Perspective argues that non-Hermitian Hamiltonians are no longer a mathematical curiosity or a crude model of decay, but a practical effective description of open quantum systems that now extends into interacting many-body regimes. After clarifying three physical origins of non-Hermitian dynamics—mean-field equations for first moments, conditional “no-click” evolution under continuous monitoring, and the exact vectorized Liouvillian—it surveys what happens when interactions and nonlinearity enter. Interactions can induce topological phases and skin-like localization with no single-particle counterpart; skin effects generalize into Fock space; dissipative chaos, many-body localization, and Krylov complexity acquire new spectral and dynamical signatures; and nonlinearity supports skin solitons and dissipative phase transitions. Measurement-induced entanglement transitions are linked to non-Hermitian spectra and topology. The synthesis is offered as a roadmap for the next stage of the field.

Core claim

The paper’s central claim is that the interplay of non-Hermiticity with interactions and nonlinearity produces qualitatively new many-body phenomena—interaction-induced topology, Fock-space skin effects, distinct signatures of dissipative quantum chaos and complexity, nonlinear skin solitons, dissipative phase transitions, and measurement-induced entanglement transitions tied to non-Hermitian spectra—and that synthesizing these developments supplies a usable roadmap beyond linear, non-interacting models.

What carries the argument

The three physical origins of non-Hermitian dynamics (mean-field first-moment equations, conditional no-click Hamiltonians, and the exact Liouvillian superoperator), together with many-body extensions of exceptional points and the non-Hermitian skin effect that reorganize topology, localization, and relaxation in interacting open systems.

Load-bearing premise

That effective non-Hermitian generators, especially no-click Hamiltonians, remain a central and scalable organizing framework for interacting open systems even though the chance of a no-click trajectory falls exponentially with system size and time.

What would settle it

A scalable experiment that isolates interaction-induced topology or a Fock-space skin effect without exponential post-selection, or a large-N calculation showing those signatures vanish once the full jump dynamics of the Liouvillian are restored.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Interactions can open topological point gaps and produce skin localization in few- and many-body sectors that are trivial at the single-particle level.
  • Fock-space skin effects can bias the system toward extremal configurations, suppress transport, and produce relaxation times that grow exponentially with system size.
  • Complex level-spacing ratios, singular-value statistics, and Krylov complexity become diagnostics of dissipative chaos and localization in open many-body systems.
  • Nonlinearity can balance non-reciprocal drift to form skin solitons and can drive dissipative phase transitions with no equilibrium counterpart.
  • Measurement-induced entanglement transitions can be read through non-Hermitian spectral structure, including subradiance and skin-effect flow, provided post-selection or feedback costs are managed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Platforms that combine continuous monitoring with feedback or error mitigation will likely be required before Fock-space skin effects and interaction-induced topology become routine laboratory observables.
  • Because spectral signatures of non-Hermitian many-body localization remain contested against transport diagnostics, steady-state current measurements at large system size will decide whether localization survives in the thermodynamic limit.
  • Unifying no-click effective Hamiltonians with full Liouvillian dynamics at scale could turn non-Hermitian topology into a design tool for directional amplification and autonomous state preparation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Perspective charts non-Hermitian physics from single-particle/linear foundations (PT symmetry, biorthogonal QM, EPs, NHSE) to interacting and nonlinear many-body frontiers. Section II carefully distinguishes physical origins of effective non-Hermitian dynamics—mean-field equations for first moments of quadratic open systems, reservoir-engineered non-reciprocity, conditional no-click trajectories, and the vectorized Liouvillian—while surveying experimental platforms. Section III synthesizes interaction-induced topology, Fock-space and multipole skin effects, dissipative quantum chaos and contested non-Hermitian MBL diagnostics, Krylov complexity, nonlinear exceptional points and skin solitons, dissipative phase transitions, and links between measurement-induced entanglement transitions and non-Hermitian spectra/topology. The authors conclude with a roadmap emphasizing experimental many-body control, post-selection costs, and technological applications.

Significance. As a selective Perspective rather than a theorem or experiment, the manuscript’s value lies in organizing a rapidly expanding frontier. The explicit separation of mean-field, no-click, and Liouvillian origins (Sec. II) and the honest flagging of open controversies (NH-MBL thermodynamic fate, SVD diagnostics in Sec. III.B.2) and exponential post-selection costs (Sec. II.C, III.D) make the roadmap usable rather than promotional. The synthesis of interaction-induced topology, Fock-space skin effects, nonlinear skin solitons, DPTs, and measurement–non-Hermitian connections is timely for quant-ph and related communities and should help orient both theorists and experimentalists. Strengths include clear conceptual distinctions and balanced treatment of contested topics; the work does not claim new derivations or machine-checked results, which is appropriate for its genre.

minor comments (4)
  1. A short explicit statement early in Sec. III that the literature selection is deliberately non-exhaustive (already noted in the Introduction) would further set reader expectations for a Perspective.
  2. In Sec. III.B.2 the SVD-based diagnostics and the finite-current counter-argument are both cited; a single clarifying sentence on how these diagnostics relate (or fail to relate) to transport would reduce residual ambiguity without resolving the open debate.
  3. Occasional typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., spacing around PT, accented names). A light copy-edit pass would polish presentation.
  4. Sec. III.D could briefly note which of the cited measurement-induced protocols are currently most accessible without full post-selection, to strengthen the experimental outlook already present in the Conclusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Perspective roadmap with no definitional or fitted circularity; only minor non-load-bearing author self-citations in the literature survey.

full rationale

This is a selective Perspective synthesizing existing literature into a roadmap for interacting/nonlinear non-Hermitian physics (Abstract; Sec. I–IV). It contains no first-principles derivation, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz smuggled via citation that forces a new result by construction. Physical origins of non-Hermiticity are carefully distinguished (mean-field, no-click, vectorized Liouvillian; Sec. II) with explicit caveats on exponential post-selection cost (Sec. II.C) and open debates (e.g., NH-MBL stability and SVD diagnostics; Sec. III.B.2). Author self-citations ([3], [77], [78], [81]) appear as ordinary contributions within the surveyed literature alongside independent works and are not the sole load-bearing justification for any central claim. The synthesis itself is therefore self-contained as a literature map; circularity burden is negligible.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a perspective, the paper inherits the standard open-systems toolkit rather than introducing free fits or new physical entities. Load-bearing content is synthesis of prior literature under conventional Markovian/open-system assumptions; invented entities are not introduced by this manuscript.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Markovian Lindblad (GKSL) master equations are an adequate starting point for the open-system dynamics discussed.
    Used throughout Sec. II to derive mean-field non-Hermitian matrices, reservoir-engineered non-reciprocity, no-click generators, and the vectorized Liouvillian.
  • domain assumption Non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonians and Liouvillians are legitimate dynamical generators for the regimes considered (mean-field moments, post-selected trajectories, full relaxation).
    Stated as the paper’s answer to skepticism in Sec. II; underpins the entire roadmap from single-particle topology to many-body frontiers.
  • standard math Biorthogonal left/right eigenstructure is the correct spectral framework for non-Hermitian operators with possible complex spectra and exceptional points.
    Sec. I.C; standard mathematical background for non-Hermitian spectral theory used later for EPs, topology, and Liouvillian spectra.
  • ad hoc to paper Selective focus on interacting/nonlinear extensions (rather than exhaustive single-particle topology) still yields a representative roadmap of the field’s frontier.
    Explicitly declared in the Introduction; the paper’s claim to chart the trajectory depends on this editorial scope choice.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 22647 in / 2637 out tokens · 34714 ms · 2026-07-14T21:46:17.676097+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

For decades, Hermiticity was considered an immutable axiom of quantum mechanics, essential for ensuring real energies and unitary evolution. This perspective has shifted radically, driven by the realization that non-Hermitian Hamiltonians provide a powerful effective description of open quantum systems, granting access to unique phenomena such as Exceptional Points and the Non-Hermitian Skin Effect. In this Perspective, we chart the trajectory of this field, moving from its established foundations in single-particle, linear models to the emerging frontier of interacting many-body systems. We first clarify the physical origins of non-Hermitian dynamics, distinguishing between mean-field approximations, conditional "no-click" evolution, and exact Liouvillian dynamics. We then focus on the rich phenomenology arising from the interplay of non-Hermiticity and interactions. We discuss interaction-induced topological phases, the generalization of skin effects to the many-body Hilbert space, and the distinct signatures of dissipative quantum chaos and complexity. Finally, we highlight collective phenomena in nonlinear regimes, including skin solitons and dissipative phase transitions. We also comment on measurement-induced entanglement transitions and their relation to non-Hermitian spectra and topology. By synthesizing these diverse developments, we provide a roadmap for the future of non-Hermitian physics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Hermitian entropy production from fluctuation theorems

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Post-selected fluctuation theorems yield a nonnegative entropy production Σ=⟨ΔS⟩+Ξ for non-Hermitian evolution, equal to a Petz–Rényi gap and sensitive to exceptional points via its coherent part.

  2. Symmetry-Fractionalized Skin Effects in Non-Hermitian Luttinger Liquids

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Skin effects in non-Hermitian Luttinger liquids fractionalize by symmetry, producing decoupled spin and charge skin modes at low energies plus an interaction-enabled E8 skin effect absent in free fermions.

  3. Engineering of non-Hermitian interactions in digital qudit quantum simulators

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives an analytical mapping from hybrid unitary-projective qutrit evolution to target non-Hermitian two-body interactions for pseudo-spins in a Zeno subspace, validated numerically.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Gain/Loss and Exceptional Points 2

  2. [2]

    Non-Hermitian Dynamics and Where to Find Them 3 A

    Non-reciprocity and Non-Hermitian Topology 2 II. Non-Hermitian Dynamics and Where to Find Them 3 A. Mean-Field Dynamics 3 B. Engineering Non-Reciprocity 3 C. The No-Click Limit 3 D. The Vectorized Lindbladian 4 E. Experiments probing non-Hermitian phenomena 4 III. Interacting and Nonlinear Frontiers 5 A. Topology and skin effects 5

  3. [3]

    Interaction-Induced Topology 5

  4. [4]

    Topology of driven dissipative nonlinear systems 5

  5. [5]

    Chaos, localization and complexity 6

    Many-body skin effects 6 B. Chaos, localization and complexity 6

  6. [6]

    Dissipative Quantum Chaos 6

  7. [7]

    Non-Hermitian Many-Body Localization 7

  8. [8]

    Nonlinearity and Collective Phenomena 7

    Krylov Complexity in Non-Hermitian systems 7 C. Nonlinearity and Collective Phenomena 7

  9. [9]

    Nonlinear exceptional points and skin solitons 7

  10. [10]

    no-click

    Phase transitions of interacting systems 8 D. Measurement-induced phenomena and non-Hermitian physics 8 IV. Conclusion 9 Acknowledgments 9 References 9 I. INTRODUCTION This Perspective aims to chart the trajectory of non- Hermitian physics, moving from its established founda- tions in classical and single-particle quantum mechan- ics toward the complex an...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    This can describe an open sys- tem exchanging particles or energy with a reservoir at specific sites

    Gain/Loss and Exceptional Points The first mechanism is the introduction of local dissi- pation or amplification, manifesting as complex diagonal elements (Im(Hii)̸= 0). This can describe an open sys- tem exchanging particles or energy with a reservoir at specific sites. This mechanism is historically the play- ground ofPTsymmetry, where the minimal model...

  12. [12]

    point gap

    Non-reciprocity and Non-Hermitian Topology The second mechanism involves non-reciprocal cou- plings,H ij ̸=H ∗ ji (i̸=j). The seminal example is the 2 Hatano-Nelson model [13]. In order to engineer non- reciprocity, they considered a single particle described by a Schr¨ odinger equation subject to an imaginary vec- tor potential. When this continuum model...

  13. [13]

    interaction-induced topology

    Interaction-Induced Topology A striking consequence of the interplay between non- Hermiticity and interactions is the emergence of topolog- ical phases that have no counterpart in the single-particle regime. This phenomenon, dubbed “interaction-induced topology” suggests that non-Hermitian topological prop- erties can be emergent, requiring a minimum numb...

  14. [14]

    graph index

    Topology of driven dissipative nonlinear systems In the semiclassical regime of interacting models, the definition of topology becomes subtle. Standard band theory, which relies on the diagonalization of linear oper- ators, cannot be directly applied to the nonlinear equa- tions of motion governing mean-field order parameters. A recent proposal by Villa e...

  15. [15]

    skin effect

    Many-body skin effects Beyond the single and two-particle sectors, the concept of boundary localization undergoes a fundamental trans- formation when applied to the full many-body Hilbert space. In this regime, the “skin effect” is no longer just about particles piling up at a physical edge; it manifests as an extreme localization of the system’s state wi...

  16. [16]

    exclusion zone

    Dissipative Quantum Chaos In closed quantum systems, the hallmark of chaos is the repulsion of energy levels, historically diagnosed via the statistics of real energy gaps (Wigner-Dyson statistics). In the non-Hermitian realm, eigenvalues become complex, necessitating a generalization of these diagnostics to the complex plane. A major step in this directi...

  17. [17]

    real-complex

    Non-Hermitian Many-Body Localization The introduction of dissipation challenges the stability of the Many-Body Localized (MBL) phase. The seminal work by Hamazaki and Ueda generalized MBL to non- Hermitian systems, identifying a phase transition where complex eigenvalues switch from obeying Wigner-Dyson statistics to Poissonian statistics [75]. Crucially,...

  18. [18]

    operator growth hypothesis

    Krylov Complexity in Non-Hermitian systems Recent efforts have extended the “operator growth hypothesis”—which posits that chaotic evolution drives simple operators into complex superpositions—to the open quantum regime. A central platform for this investi- gation has been the dissipative Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model. Bhattacharjee et al. explored the Kr...

  19. [19]

    nonlinear exceptional points

    Nonlinear exceptional points and skin solitons The study of non-Hermitian singularities has tradi- tionally focused on linear operators, where Exceptional Points (EPs) are strictly defined by the coalescence of both eigenvalues and eigenvectors (defectiveness). How- ever, recent work has begun to unravel how nonlinearity reshapes these concepts. Challengi...

  20. [20]

    dis- sipative phase transitions

    Phase transitions of interacting systems A central theme in many-body physics is the classifica- tion of phases and the transitions between them. In open systems, the interplay between unitarity, dissipation, and non-reciprocity enriches this landscape, leading to “dis- sipative phase transitions” (DPTs) that defy equilibrium classification. Recent exact ...

  21. [21]

    Non-Hermitian physics,

    Yuto Ashida, Zongping Gong, and Masahito Ueda, “Non-Hermitian physics,” Advances in Physics69, 249– 435 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,

    Emil J. Bergholtz, Jan Carl Budich, and Flore K. Kunst, “Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,” Re- views of Modern Physics93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Non-Hermitian physics in open quantum systems,

    Federico Roccati, G. Massimo Palma, Francesco Cic- carello, and Fabio Bagarello, “Non-Hermitian physics in open quantum systems,” Open Systems & Information Dynamics29, 2250004 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Paul A. M. Dirac,The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, 1930)

    1930

  25. [25]

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione,The The- ory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    2002

  26. [26]

    1(Wiley-VCH, 1977)

    Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Franck Lalo¨ e,Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 1(Wiley-VCH, 1977)

    1977

  27. [27]

    Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians HavingPTSymmetry,

    Carl M. Bender and Stefan Boettcher, “Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians HavingPTSymmetry,” Physical Review Letters80, 5243–5246 (1998)

    1998

  28. [28]

    Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians,

    Carl M. Bender, “Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians,” Reports on Progress in Physics70, 947 (2007)

    2007

  29. [29]

    Biorthogonal quantum mechanics,

    Dorje C. Brody, “Biorthogonal quantum mechanics,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47, 035305 (2013)

    2013

  30. [30]

    Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT sym- metry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian,

    Ali Mostafazadeh, “Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT sym- metry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian,” Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 205–214 (2002)

    2002

  31. [31]

    Metric versus observ- able operator representation, higher spin models,

    Andreas Fring and Thomas Frith, “Metric versus observ- able operator representation, higher spin models,” Phys- ical Review A95, 010102(R) (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    The physics of exceptional points,

    W. D. Heiss, “The physics of exceptional points,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 444016 (2012)

    2012

  33. [33]

    Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics,

    Naomichi Hatano and David R. Nelson, “Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics,” Physical Review Letters77, 570–573 (1996)

    1996

  34. [34]

    Topo- logical Phases of Non-Hermitian Systems,

    Zongping Gong, Yuto Ashida, Kohei Kawabata, Kazuaki Takasan, Sho Higashikawa, and Masahito Ueda, “Topo- logical Phases of Non-Hermitian Systems,” Physical Re- view X8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Topological Or- der and Non-Hermitian Skin Effect in Generalized Ideal Chern Bands,

    Jiong-Hao Wang, Christopher Ekman, Raul Perea- Causin, Hui Liu, and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Topological Or- der and Non-Hermitian Skin Effect in Generalized Ideal Chern Bands,” (2025), arXiv:2512.11084 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Edge States and Topo- logical Invariants of Non-Hermitian Systems,

    Shunyu Yao and Zhong Wang, “Edge States and Topo- logical Invariants of Non-Hermitian Systems,” Physical Review Letters121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Symmetry and Topology in Non- Hermitian Physics,

    Kohei Kawabata, Ken Shiozaki, Masahito Ueda, and Masatoshi Sato, “Symmetry and Topology in Non- Hermitian Physics,” Physical Review X9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Biorthogonal Bulk-Boundary Corre- spondence in Non-Hermitian Systems,

    Flore K. Kunst, Emil Edvardsson, Jan Carl Budich, and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Biorthogonal Bulk-Boundary Corre- spondence in Non-Hermitian Systems,” Physical Review Letters121, 026808 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    Edge Modes, Degeneracies, and Topological Numbers in Non-Hermitian Systems,

    D. Leykam, K.Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y.D. Chong, and F. Nori, “Edge Modes, Degeneracies, and Topological Numbers in Non-Hermitian Systems,” Physical Review Letters118, 040401 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    Topological dissipa- tion in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network,

    C. Leefmans, A. Dutt, J. Williams, L. Yuan, M. Parto, F. Nori, S. Fan, and A. Marandi, “Topological dissipa- tion in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network,” 9 Nature Physics18, 442–449 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Non-Abelian effects in dissipative photonic topological lattices,

    M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, F. Nori, and A. Marandi, “Non-Abelian effects in dissipative photonic topological lattices,” Nature Communications14, 1440 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Topological tem- porally mode-locked laser,

    C.R. Leefmans, M. Parto, J. Williams, G.H.Y. Li, A. Dutt, F. Nori, and A. Marandi, “Topological tem- porally mode-locked laser,” Nature Physics20, 852–858 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineer- ing,

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, “Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineer- ing,” Physical Review X5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Topological Phases of Sound and Light,

    V. Peano, M. Houde, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, “Topological Phases of Sound and Light,” Physical Re- view X6, 041026 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Topological Am- plification in Photonic Lattices,

    D. Porras and S. Fern´ andez-Lorenzo, “Topological Am- plification in Photonic Lattices,” Physical Review Letters 122, 143901 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Topological framework for directional ampli- fication in driven-dissipative cavity arrays,

    Clara C. Wanjura, Matteo Brunelli, and Andreas Nun- nenkamp, “Topological framework for directional ampli- fication in driven-dissipative cavity arrays,” Nature Com- munications11, 3149 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    Simple formulas of directional amplifica- tion from non-bloch band theory,

    Wen-Tan Xue, Ming-Rui Li, Yu-Min Hu, Fei Song, and Zhong Wang, “Simple formulas of directional amplifica- tion from non-bloch band theory,” Phys. Rev. B103, L241408 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    A pedagogical introduction to continuously monitored quantum systems and measurement-based feedback,

    Francesco Albarelli and Marco G. Genoni, “A pedagogical introduction to continuously monitored quantum systems and measurement-based feedback,” Phys. Lett. A494, 129260 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Many-Body Quan- tum Zeno Effect and Measurement-Induced Subradi- ance,

    Alberto Biella and Marco Schir´ o, “Many-Body Quan- tum Zeno Effect and Measurement-Induced Subradi- ance,” Quantum5, 536 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Measurement-Induced Phases of Matter Require Feed- back,

    Aaron J. Friedman, Oliver Hart, and Rahul Nandkishore, “Measurement-Induced Phases of Matter Require Feed- back,” PRX Quantum4, 040309 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Quantum Error Mitigation Simulates General Non-Hermitian Dynamics,

    Hiroki Kuji, Suguru Endo, Tetsuro Nikuni, Ryusuke Hamazaki, and Yuichiro Matsuzaki, “Quantum Error Mitigation Simulates General Non-Hermitian Dynamics,” (2026), arXiv:2602.21879

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, and F. Nori, “Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,” Physical Review A100, 062131 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    Hybrid-Liouvillian formalism connecting exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians and Liouvillians via postselection of quantum tra- jectories,

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R.W. Chhajlany, I.I. Arkhipov, and F. Nori, “Hybrid-Liouvillian formalism connecting exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians and Liouvillians via postselection of quantum tra- jectories,” Physical Review A101, 062112 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Liouvillian exceptional points of any order in dissipative linear bosonic systems: Coherence functions and switch- ing between PT and anti-PT symmetries,

    I.I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, and F. Nori, “Liouvillian exceptional points of any order in dissipative linear bosonic systems: Coherence functions and switch- ing between PT and anti-PT symmetries,” Physical Re- view A102, 033715 (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    PT-Symmetric Quantum Liouvillian Dy- namics,

    Tomaˇ z Prosen, “PT-Symmetric Quantum Liouvillian Dy- namics,” Physical Review Letters109, 090404 (2012)

    2012

  56. [56]

    Non- Hermitian Topological Invariants in Real Space,

    Fei Song, Shunyu Yao, and Zhong Wang, “Non- Hermitian Topological Invariants in Real Space,” Physi- cal Review Letters123, 170401 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    Liouvillian Skin Effect: Slowing Down of Relaxation Processes without Gap Closing,

    Taiki Haga, Masaya Nakagawa, Ryusuke Hamazaki, and Masahito Ueda, “Liouvillian Skin Effect: Slowing Down of Relaxation Processes without Gap Closing,” Physical Review Letters127, 070402 (2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    Observation of parity-time sym- metry in optics,

    Christian E. R¨ uter, Konstantinos G. Makris, Ramy El-Ganainy, Demetrios N. Christodoulides, Mordechai Segev, and Detlef Kip, “Observation of parity-time sym- metry in optics,” Nature Physics6, 192–195 (2010)

    2010

  59. [59]

    Parity- time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,

    S ¸.K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Parity- time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,” Na- ture Materials18, 783–798 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    Parity- time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities,

    B. Peng, S ¸.K.¨Ozdemir, F. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gianfreda, G.L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Parity- time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities,” Na- ture Physics10, 394–398 (2014)

    2014

  61. [61]

    Loss- induced suppression and revival of lasing,

    B. Peng, S ¸.K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, H. Yilmaz, M. Liertzer, F. Monifi, C.M. Bender, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Loss- induced suppression and revival of lasing,” Science346, 328–332 (2014)

    2014

  62. [62]

    PT-Symmetric Phonon Laser,

    H. Jing, S ¸.K.¨Ozdemir, X.-Y. L¨ u, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and F. Nori, “PT-Symmetric Phonon Laser,” Physical Review Letters113, 053604 (2014)

    2014

  63. [63]

    Optomechanically induced stochastic resonance and chaos transfer between optical fields,

    F. Monifi, J. Zhang, S ¸.K. ¨Ozdemir, B. Peng, Y. Liu, F. Bo, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Optomechanically induced stochastic resonance and chaos transfer between optical fields,” Nature Photonics10, 399–405 (2016)

    2016

  64. [64]

    A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point,

    J. Zhang, B. Peng, S ¸.K. ¨Ozdemir, K. Pichler, D.O. Krimer, G. Zhao, F. Nori, Y. Liu, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, “A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point,” Na- ture Photonics12, 479–484 (2018)

    2018

  65. [65]

    Optomechanically- induced transparency in parity-time-symmetric microres- onators,

    H. Jing, S ¸.K. ¨Ozdemir, Z. Geng, J. Zhang, X.-Y. L¨ u, B. Peng, L. Yang, and F. Nori, “Optomechanically- induced transparency in parity-time-symmetric microres- onators,” Scientific Reports5, 9663 (2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit,

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Yogesh N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, “Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit,” Nature Physics 15, 1232–1236 (2019)

    2019

  67. [67]

    Topological Quantum State Control through Exceptional-Point Prox- imity,

    Maryam Abbasi, Weijian Chen, Mahdi Naghiloo, Yo- gesh N. Joglekar, and Kater W. Murch, “Topological Quantum State Control through Exceptional-Point Prox- imity,” Physical Review Letters128, 160401 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Generating arbi- trary topological windings of a non-Hermitian band,

    Kai Wang, Avik Dutt, Ki Youl Yang, Casey C. Wojcik, Jelena Vuˇ ckovi´ c, and Shanhui Fan, “Generating arbi- trary topological windings of a non-Hermitian band,” Sci- ence371, 1240–1245 (2021)

    2021

  69. [69]

    Acoustic non-Hermitian skin effect from twisted winding topology,

    Li Zhang, Yihao Yang, Yong Ge, Yi-Jun Guan, Qiaolu Chen, Qinghui Yan, Fujia Chen, Rui Xi, Yuanzhen Li, Ding Jia,et al., “Acoustic non-Hermitian skin effect from twisted winding topology,” Nature Communications12, 6297 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    Phase-Dependent Chiral Transport and Effective Non- Hermitian Dynamics in a Bosonic Kitaev-Majorana Chain,

    A. McDonald, T. Pereg-Barnea, and A. A. Clerk, “Phase-Dependent Chiral Transport and Effective Non- Hermitian Dynamics in a Bosonic Kitaev-Majorana Chain,” Physical Review X8, 041031 (2018)

    2018

  71. [71]

    Quantum simulation of the bosonic Kitaev chain,

    Jamal H. Busnaina, Zheng Shi, Alexander McDonald, Dmytro Dubyna, Ibrahim Nsanzineza, Jimmy S. C. Hung, C. W. Sandbo Chang, Aashish A. Clerk, and Christopher M. Wilson, “Quantum simulation of the bosonic Kitaev chain,” Nature Communications15, 3065 (2024)

    2024

  72. [72]

    Optomechanical realization of the bosonic Kitaev chain,

    Jesse J. Slim, Clara C. Wanjura, Matteo Brunelli, Javier del Pino, Andreas Nunnenkamp, and Ewold Verha- gen, “Optomechanical realization of the bosonic Kitaev chain,” Nature627, 767–771 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Interaction-Induced Non-Hermitian Topological Phases from a Dynamical Gauge Field,

    W. N. Faugno and Tomoki Ozawa, “Interaction-Induced Non-Hermitian Topological Phases from a Dynamical Gauge Field,” Physical Review Letters129, 180401 (2022)

    2022

  74. [74]

    Interaction-induced analog of a non-Hermitian skin effect in a lattice two-body problem,

    Alexander N. Poddubny, “Interaction-induced analog of a non-Hermitian skin effect in a lattice two-body problem,” Physical Review B107, 045131 (2023)

    2023

  75. [75]

    Topological classification of driven- dissipative nonlinear systems,

    Greta Villa, Javier del Pino, Vincent Dumont, Gian- luca Rastelli, Mateusz Micha lek, Alexander Eichler, and Oded Zilberberg, “Topological classification of driven- dissipative nonlinear systems,” Science Advances (2025), 10.1126/sciadv.adt9311. 10

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adt9311 2025

  76. [76]

    General Crite- rion for Non-Hermitian Skin Effects and Application: Fock Space Skin Effects in Many-Body Systems,

    Kenji Shimomura and Masatoshi Sato, “General Crite- rion for Non-Hermitian Skin Effects and Application: Fock Space Skin Effects in Many-Body Systems,” Physi- cal Review Letters133, 136502 (2024)

    2024

  77. [77]

    Many-body non-hermitian skin effect with exact steady states in the dissipative quantum link model,

    Yu-Min Hu, Zijian Wang, Biao Lian, and Zhong Wang, “Many-body non-hermitian skin effect with exact steady states in the dissipative quantum link model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 260401 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Many-Body Non-Hermitian Skin Effect for Multipoles,

    Jacopo Gliozzi, Giuseppe De Tomasi, and Taylor L. Hughes, “Many-Body Non-Hermitian Skin Effect for Multipoles,” Physical Review Letters133, 136503 (2024)

    2024

  79. [79]

    Many-body critical non-Hermitian skin effect,

    Yi Qin, Yee Sin Ang, Ching Hua Lee, and Linhu Li, “Many-body critical non-Hermitian skin effect,” Commu- nications Physics9, 16 (2025)

    2025

  80. [80]

    Emergent fermi surface in a many-body non-hermitian fermionic chain,

    Sen Mu, Ching Hua Lee, Linhu Li, and Jiangbin Gong, “Emergent fermi surface in a many-body non-hermitian fermionic chain,” Phys. Rev. B102, 081115 (2020)

    2020

Showing first 80 references.