pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.15621 · v2 · pith:FL3FBB2Pnew · submitted 2026-03-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-lat· hep-ph· nucl-th

Exclusive Scattering Channels from Entanglement Structure in Real-Time Simulations

Nikita A. Zemlevskiy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 10:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-lathep-phnucl-th
keywords scattering channelsentanglement structurematrix product statesreal-time simulationsquantum field theoryIsing field theorySchmidt decompositionelastic inelastic separation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Schmidt decompositions at spatial bipartitions isolate elastic and inelastic scattering channels in real-time MPS simulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a method to extract individual scattering channels from the late-time state in Matrix Product State simulations of quantum field theories. It uses Schmidt decompositions across spatial cuts in the post-collision wavefunction to separate processes that conserve particle species from those that produce new particles, without relying on prior knowledge of asymptotic wavefunctions. A reader would care because scattering events are superpositions of many allowed outcomes, and resolving them individually has been a bottleneck in numerical studies of particle collisions. The method is applied to detect heavy particles created in collisions within the one-dimensional Ising field theory.

Core claim

The paper claims that Schmidt decompositions performed at spatial bipartitions of the post-scattering wavefunction directly identify and isolate elastic and inelastic contributions, allowing deterministic detection of outgoing particles of specific species. This approach is demonstrated in Matrix Product State simulations and is shown to work for heavy-particle production in the one-dimensional Ising field theory.

What carries the argument

Schmidt decompositions at spatial bipartitions of the late-time wavefunction, which partition the state according to its entanglement structure to separate scattering channels.

If this is right

  • The method identifies specific outgoing particle species in collisions without asymptotic wavefunction input.
  • It extends to non-scattering settings where late-time entanglement structure encodes process outcomes.
  • Higher-order processes such as multi-particle production become accessible through repeated bipartition cuts.
  • The same entanglement-based separation applies to quantum simulations of other one-dimensional field theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bipartition cuts reliably label channels, the technique could be combined with existing MPS time-evolution routines to post-process scattering data on the fly.
  • Testing the method on integrable models with known exact S-matrices would provide a direct benchmark for its accuracy.
  • The approach suggests that spatial entanglement measures might serve as order parameters for classifying final-state configurations in broader classes of real-time simulations.

Load-bearing premise

That the entanglement structure across spatial cuts in the post-scattering state corresponds one-to-one with distinct elastic and inelastic scattering channels.

What would settle it

Apply the decomposition procedure to a simulated two-particle collision whose full channel decomposition is already known from direct projection onto asymptotic states, then check whether the extracted components reproduce the known channel probabilities and particle species.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.15621 by Nikita A. Zemlevskiy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dispersion relations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy densities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Circuits that could be used to measure momentum using the translation operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The circuit for preparing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Velocity differences [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A scattering event in a quantum field theory is a coherent superposition of all processes consistent with its symmetries and kinematics. While real-time simulations have progressed toward resolving individual channels, existing approaches rely on knowledge of the asymptotic particle wavefunctions. This work introduces an experimentally inspired method to isolate scattering channels in Matrix Product State simulations based on the entanglement structure of the late-time wavefunction. Schmidt decompositions at spatial bipartitions of the post-scattering state identify elastic and inelastic contributions, enabling deterministic detection of outgoing particles of specific species. This method may be used in settings beyond scattering and is applied to detect heavy particles produced in a collision in the one-dimensional Ising field theory. Natural extensions to quantum simulations of other systems and higher-order processes are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an experimentally inspired method to isolate exclusive scattering channels in real-time Matrix Product State (MPS) simulations of quantum field theories. It relies on Schmidt decompositions performed at spatial bipartitions of the late-time wavefunction to distinguish elastic and inelastic contributions and to detect outgoing particles of specific species, such as heavy particles produced in collisions within the one-dimensional Ising field theory. The approach is presented as independent of prior knowledge of asymptotic particle wavefunctions and is discussed in the context of broader applications to quantum simulations and higher-order processes.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing separation issues, the work would provide a useful tool for channel-resolved analysis in tensor-network simulations where asymptotic states are difficult to access a priori. The entanglement-based identification is a natural fit for MPS representations and could extend to other real-time quantum simulation settings. The explicit application to heavy-particle detection in the Ising model offers a concrete demonstration, though the overall impact hinges on demonstrating robustness against finite-time effects.

major comments (1)
  1. [Method description (post-scattering state analysis)] The central methodological claim (described in the abstract and the paragraph outlining the approach) that a single spatial bipartition and its Schmidt decomposition maps deterministically onto exclusive channels assumes that outgoing wave packets have propagated sufficiently far for their supports to lie cleanly on one side or the other of the cut. In real-time evolution, finite dispersion and light-cone tails imply that at any finite time the bipartition will capture overlapping contributions from multiple channels. The manuscript must specify the procedure for selecting and validating the cut position (e.g., via stability tests under small shifts or convergence with increasing evolution time) and demonstrate that the resulting singular values or Schmidt vectors remain channel-specific rather than mixed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Application to Ising field theory] Clarify the precise definition of the spatial bipartition (e.g., bond index or physical cut location) and how it is chosen relative to the light-cone structure in the Ising application.
  2. [Discussion of extensions] Add a brief discussion of computational cost or scaling of the Schmidt decomposition step relative to the overall MPS evolution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the methodological details. We agree that finite-time effects require explicit discussion and will strengthen the presentation accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central methodological claim (described in the abstract and the paragraph outlining the approach) that a single spatial bipartition and its Schmidt decomposition maps deterministically onto exclusive channels assumes that outgoing wave packets have propagated sufficiently far for their supports to lie cleanly on one side or the other of the cut. In real-time evolution, finite dispersion and light-cone tails imply that at any finite time the bipartition will capture overlapping contributions from multiple channels. The manuscript must specify the procedure for selecting and validating the cut position (e.g., via stability tests under small shifts or convergence with increasing evolution time) and demonstrate that the resulting singular values or Schmidt vectors remain channel-specific rather than mixed.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation on the role of finite-time effects. In the original work the bipartition location was chosen according to the group velocities extracted from the dispersion relation so that, at the selected late time, the dominant support of each outgoing wave packet lies on opposite sides of the cut. We acknowledge that light-cone tails and dispersion prevent perfect separation at any finite time. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection that (i) states the explicit criterion used to place the cut, (ii) reports stability of the extracted singular values under small shifts of the cut position, and (iii) shows convergence of the Schmidt spectrum with increasing evolution time. These additions will make clear that, while the mapping is approximate, the dominant singular values remain channel-specific within the time window employed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method introduced as experimentally inspired without reducing to self-definition or fitted inputs

full rationale

The paper introduces a new method for isolating scattering channels via Schmidt decompositions on late-time MPS states, presented as experimentally inspired and independent of prior wavefunction knowledge. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are described in the provided text that would make the channel identification equivalent to its inputs by construction. The central claim rests on the entanglement structure of the post-scattering state rather than any tautological renaming or load-bearing self-reference. This is the most common honest finding for a methods paper that does not derive its core result from a prior fit or internal definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1102 out tokens · 50486 ms · 2026-05-21T10:28:34.255505+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Machine Learning for particle scattering entanglement classification

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A 4-qubit QCNN classifies entanglement thresholds from fermion density profiles in the Thirring model more effectively than comparable classical CNNs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    II is modified

    Entanglement Spectrum and Higher-Order Channels To accommodate finite simulation time and wavepacket spreading, as well as a small difference in the outgoing velocities of |1(11)⟩ and |1(12)⟩, the general method described in Sec. II is modified. At the bipartition of the system at lattice site nl = 53 (see Fig. 2), the system has three significant Schmidt...

    work page

  2. [2]

    detector

    Particle Classification After the states contributing to|f ⟩ are isolated, the kinematics of the process can be used to classify the particles by type within each channel. Table IV shows the details of the classification calculation. The velocityv of the excitations in each state is given in the second column. It may be computed by isolating exclusive sta...

    work page

  3. [3]

    State Preparation The initial states of the scattering simulations in this work contain two|1⟩ particles with momenta ±ki. These particles are represented by localized wavepackets built out of plane-wave excitations|ψk⟩ centered around ±ki and lattice position n0, |ψwp⟩ = N X k e−ikn0 e−(ki−k)2/(2σ2 k)|ψk⟩ , (D1) where N is a normalization factor andσk is...

    work page

  4. [4]

    After this time, the MPS is truncated tomax_bond = 350 with the same cutoff to increase the speed of the simulation, which introduces truncation errors ofO(10−3)

    MPS Details The MPS time evolution simulations are done with a bond dimension ofmax_bond = 600 and cutoff of10−9 to t = 40, well past the collision time (t ∼ 8). After this time, the MPS is truncated tomax_bond = 350 with the same cutoff to increase the speed of the simulation, which introduces truncation errors ofO(10−3). The norm of the state is used to...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Rafelski and B

    J. Rafelski and B. Muller, Strangeness Production in the Quark - Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1066 (1982), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 56, 2334 (1986)]

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. (ALICE), Enhanced production of multi-strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton-proton collisions, Nature Phys.13, 535 (2017), arXiv:1606.07424 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    M. E. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler, and F. Hoyle, Synthesis of the elements in stars, Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 547 (1957)

    work page 1957

  9. [9]

    Simulating chemistry using quantum computers

    I. Kassal, J. D. Whitfield, A. Perdomo-Ortiz, M.-H. Yung, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Simulating Chemistry Using Quantum Computers, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.62, 185 (2011), arXiv:1007.2648 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [10]

    Manthe and R

    U. Manthe and R. Ellerbrock, S-matrix decomposition, natural reaction channels, and the quantum transition state ap- proach to reactive scattering, The Journal of Chemical Physics144, 204119 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Quantum simulations of hadron dynamics in the Schwinger model using 112 qubits, Phys. Rev. D109, 114510 (2024), arXiv:2401.08044 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Davoudi, C.-C

    Z. Davoudi, C.-C. Hsieh, and S. V. Kadam, Scattering wave packets of hadrons in gauge theories: Preparation on a quantum computer, Quantum8, 1520 (2024), arXiv:2402.00840 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    N. A. Zemlevskiy, Scalable quantum simulations of scattering in scalar field theory on 120 qubits, Phys. Rev. D112, 034502 (2025), arXiv:2411.02486 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Hite, Improved Fermionic Scattering for the NISQ Era, (2025), arXiv:2505.00476 [quant-ph]

    M. Hite, Improved Fermionic Scattering for the NISQ Era, (2025), arXiv:2505.00476 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Y. Chai, A. Crippa, K. Jansen, S. Kühn, V. R. Pascuzzi, F. Tacchino, and I. Tavernelli, Fermionic wave packet scattering: a quantum computing approach, Quantum9, 1638 (2025), arXiv:2312.02272 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Y. Chai, J. Gibbs, V. R. Pascuzzi, Z. Holmes, S. Kühn, F. Tacchino, and I. Tavernelli, Resource-Efficient Simulations of Particle Scattering on a Digital Quantum Computer, (2025), arXiv:2507.17832 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Schuhmacher, G.-X

    J. Schuhmacher, G.-X. Su, J. J. Osborne, A. Gandon, J. C. Halimeh, and I. Tavernelli, Observation of hadron scattering in a lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, (2025), arXiv:2505.20387 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    R. C. Farrell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and J. Preskill, Digital quantum simulations of scattering in quantum field theories using W states, (2025), arXiv:2505.03111 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    The Quantum Complexity of String Breaking in the Schwinger Model

    S. Grieninger, M. J. Savage, and N. A. Zemlevskiy, The Quantum Complexity of String Breaking in the Schwinger Model, (2026), arXiv:2601.08825 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. E. Kharzeev, V. Korepin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, Quantum real-time evolution of entanglement and hadronization in jet production: Lessons from the massive Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D110, 094029 (2024), arXiv:2404.00087 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States

    H. Li and F. Haldane, Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008), arXiv:0805.0332 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Fidkowski, Entanglement Spectrum of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Phys

    L. Fidkowski, Entanglement Spectrum of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 130502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Topological nature of spinons and holons: Elementary excitations from matrix product states with conserved symmetries

    V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, I. P. McCulloch, and F. Verstraete, Topological nature of spinons and holons: Elementary excitations from matrix product states with conserved symmetries, Phys. Rev. B97, 235155 (2018), arXiv:1802.07197 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Cocchiarella, M

    D. Cocchiarella, M. Yang, Y. Zhang, M. C. Bañuls, H.-H. Tu, and Y. Liu, Excited states from local effective Hamiltonians of matrix product states and their entanglement spectrum transition, (2025), arXiv:2511.16746 [cond-mat.str-el]. 15

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Mishima, M

    K. Mishima, M. Hayashi, and S. Lin, Entanglement in scattering processes, Physics Letters A333, 371 (2004)

    work page 2004

  26. [26]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Anti-Flatness and Non-Local Magic in Two-Particle Scattering Processes, (2025), arXiv:2510.23426 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    C. P. Martin, Entanglement through high-energy scattering in noncommutative quantum electrodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 97 (2026), arXiv:2506.15350 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Quantum Information at the Electron-Ion Collider,

    K. Cheng, T. Han, and S. Trifinopoulos, Quantum Information at the Electron-Ion Collider, (2025), arXiv:2510.23773 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Mendez and F

    M. Mendez and F. M. Pont, Dynamics of correlations and entanglement generation in electron-molecule inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. A111, 052411 (2025), arXiv:2411.10358 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    G. M. Quinta and R. André, Multipartite entanglement from consecutive scatterings, Phys. Rev. A109, 022433 (2024), arXiv:2311.11102 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    E. F. Zagirdinova and K. A. Kouzakov, The Effects of Quantum Entanglement in Low-Energy Proton–Proton Scattering, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull.77, 490 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Hentschinski, K

    M. Hentschinski, K. Kutak, and R. Straka, Maximally entangled proton and charged hadron multiplicity in Deep Inelastic Scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 1147 (2022), arXiv:2207.09430 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics

    A. Cervera-Lierta, J. I. Latorre, J. Rojo, and L. Rottoli, Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics, SciPost Phys.3, 036 (2017), arXiv:1703.02989 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Y. Hida, H. Nakazato, K. Yuasa, and Y. Omar, Entanglement Generation by Qubit Scattering in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. A80, 012310 (2009), arXiv:0904.4762 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    N. L. Harshman and G. Hutton, Entanglement Generation in the Scattering of One-Dimensional Particles, Phys. Rev. A 77, 042310 (2008), arXiv:0710.5776 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  36. [36]

    G. L. Giorgi and F. de Pasquale, Two-spin entanglement induced by electron scattering in nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 74, 153308 (2006), arXiv:cond-mat/0607603

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [37]

    Resonant Scattering Can Enhance the Degree of Entanglement

    K. Yuasa and H. Nakazato, Resonant Scattering Can Enhance the Degree of Entanglement, J. Phys. A40, 297 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0609217

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  38. [38]

    Generation of bipartite spin entanglement via spin-independent scattering

    L. Lamata and J. Leon, Generation of bipartite spin entanglement via spin-independent scattering, Phys. Rev. A73, 052322 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0602090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Scattering induced dynamical entanglement and the quantum-classical correspondence

    M. Lombardi and A. Matzkin, Scattering induced dynamical entanglement and the quantum-classical correspondence, EPL 74, 771 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0506188

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    N. L. Harshman, Limits on entanglement in rotationally-invariant scattering of spin systems, Phys. Rev. A73, 062326 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0509013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    Peschanski and S

    R. Peschanski and S. Seki, Evaluation of Entanglement Entropy in High Energy Elastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. D100, 076012 (2019), arXiv:1906.09696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Bai and Z

    D. Bai and Z. Ren, Entanglement generation in few-nucleon scattering, Phys. Rev. C106, 064005 (2022), arXiv:2212.11092 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Kowalska and E

    K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, Entanglement in flavored scalar scattering, JHEP07, 156, arXiv:2404.13743 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    J.Hales, U.Bajpai, T.Liu, D.R.Baykusheva, M.Li, M.Mitrano,andY.Wang,Witnessinglight-drivenentanglementusing time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering, Nature Commun.14, 3512 (2023), arXiv:2209.02283 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Schmüser and D

    F. Schmüser and D. Janzing, Entanglement generation via scattering of two particles with hard-core repulsion, Phys. Rev. A 73, 052313 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    K.A.Kouzakov, L.Chotorlishvili, J.Wätzel, J.Berakdar,andA.Ernst,Entanglementbalanceofquantum (e, 2e)scattering processes, Phys. Rev. A100, 022311 (2019), arXiv:1908.04508 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    E. B. Karlsson, Entanglement created in scattering processes, Physica Scripta96, 025104 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    C. M. Sou, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Entanglement features in scattering mediated by heavy particles, JHEP10, 003, arXiv:2507.03555 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Tkachev, S

    I. Tkachev, S. Musin, D. Abdurashitov, A. Baranov, F. Guber, A. Ivashkin, and A. Strizhak, Measuring the evolution of entanglement in Compton scattering, Sci. Rep.15, 6064 (2025), arXiv:2406.14352 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    J.Gargalionis, N.Moynihan, S.Trifinopoulos, E.N.V.Wallace, C.D.White,andM.J.White,Spinversusnonstabilizerness in gluon and graviton scattering, Phys. Rev. D113, 016007 (2026), arXiv:2508.14967 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    S. R. Beane, D. B. Kaplan, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Entanglement Suppression and Emergent Symmetries of Strong Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 102001 (2019), arXiv:1812.03138 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Quantum complexity fluctuations from nuclear and hypernuclear forces, Phys. Rev. C 112, 044004 (2025), arXiv:2405.10268 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    R. G. Jha, A. Milsted, D. Neuenfeld, J. Preskill, and P. Vieira, Real-time scattering in Ising field theory using matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023266 (2025), arXiv:2411.13645 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Milsted, J

    A. Milsted, J. Liu, J. Preskill, and G. Vidal, Collisions of False-Vacuum Bubble Walls in a Quantum Spin Chain, PRX Quantum 3, 020316 (2022), arXiv:2012.07243 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Scattering and induced false vacuum decay in the two-dimensional quantum ising model,

    L. Pavešić, M. Di Liberto, and S. Montangero, Scattering and induced false vacuum decay in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model, (2025), arXiv:2509.02702 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Papaefstathiou, J

    I. Papaefstathiou, J. Knolle, and M. C. Bañuls, Real-time scattering in the lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D111, 014504 (2025), arXiv:2402.18429 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Belyansky, S

    R. Belyansky, S. Whitsitt, N. Mueller, A. Fahimniya, E. R. Bennewitz, Z. Davoudi, and A. V. Gorshkov, High-Energy Collision of Quarks and Mesons in the Schwinger Model: From Tensor Networks to Circuit QED, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 091903 (2024), arXiv:2307.02522 [quant-ph]. 16

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Hadronic scattering in (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory from tensor networks

    J. Barata, J. Hormaza, Z.-B. Kang, and W. Qian, Hadronic scattering in (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory from tensor networks, (2025), arXiv:2511.00154 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    J. a. Barata and E. Rico, Real-time simulation of jet energy loss and entropy production in high-energy scattering with matter (2025), arXiv:2502.17558 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Rigobello, S

    M. Rigobello, S. Notarnicola, G. Magnifico, and S. Montangero, Entanglement generation in (1+1)D QED scattering processes, Phys. Rev. D104, 114501 (2021), arXiv:2105.03445 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Van Damme, L

    M. Van Damme, L. Vanderstraeten, J. De Nardis, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Real-time scattering of interacting quasiparticles in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013078 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    E. R. Bennewitz et al., Simulating Meson Scattering on Spin Quantum Simulators, Quantum 9, 1773 (2025), arXiv:2403.07061 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Kormos, M

    M. Kormos, M. Collura, G. Takács, and P. Calabrese, Real-time confinement following a quantum quench to a non- integrable model, Nature Phys.13, 246 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    F. M. Surace and A. Lerose, Scattering of mesons in quantum simulators, New J. Phys.23, 062001 (2021), arXiv:2011.10583 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Jaschke, L

    D. Jaschke, L. D. Carr, and I. de Vega, Thermalization in the quantum ising model—approximations, limits, and beyond, Quantum Science and Technology4, 034002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Borla, A

    U. Borla, A. Lazarides, C. Groß, and J. C. Halimeh, Microscopic dynamics of false vacuum decay in the2 + 1d quantum ising model (2026), arXiv:2601.04305 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. Kharzeev, V. Korepin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, Real-Time Nonperturbative Dynamics of Jet Production in Schwinger Model: Quantum Entanglement and Vacuum Modification, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 021902 (2023), arXiv:2301.11991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Tirrito, P

    E. Tirrito, P. S. Tarabunga, G. Lami, T. Chanda, L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, M. Dalmonte, M. Collura, and A. Hamma, Quantifying nonstabilizerness through entanglement spectrum flatness, Phys. Rev. A109, L040401 (2024), arXiv:2304.01175 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories

    S. Ghosh, R. M. Soni, and S. P. Trivedi, On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories, JHEP 09, 069, arXiv:1501.02593 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Turkeshi, P

    X. Turkeshi, P. Ruggiero, V. Alba, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement equipartition in critical random spin chains, Phys. Rev. B102, 014455 (2020), arXiv:2005.03331 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    R. H. Dalitz, On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-meson, Phil. Mag. Ser. 744, 1068 (1953)

    work page 1953

  72. [72]

    R. H. Dalitz, Decay of tau mesons of known charge, Phys. Rev.94, 1046 (1954)

    work page 1954

  73. [73]

    G. C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Event Shapes in e+ e- Annihilation, Nucl. Phys. B149, 413 (1979), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 157, 543 (1979)]

    work page 1979

  74. [74]

    S matrix from matrix product states

    L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, T. J. Osborne, and F. Verstraete, S-matrix from matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 257202 (2014), arXiv:1312.6793 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    S. R. Beane, R. C. Farrell, and M. Varma, Entanglement minimization in hadronic scattering with pions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36, 2150205 (2021), arXiv:2108.00646 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    S. R. Beane and R. C. Farrell, Geometry and entanglement in the scattering matrix, Annals Phys.433, 168581 (2021), arXiv:2011.01278 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Dalmonte, V

    M. Dalmonte, V. Eisler, M. Falconi, and B. Vermersch, Entanglement hamiltonians: From field theory to lattice models and experiments, Annalen der Physik534, 2200064 (2022), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.202200064

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.202200064 2022

  78. [78]

    Gray, quimb: a python library for quantum information and many-body calculations, J

    J. Gray, quimb: a python library for quantum information and many-body calculations, J. Open Source Software3, 819 (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    Van Damme, L

    M. Van Damme, L. Devos, and J. Haegeman, Mpskit (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrals of Motion and S Matrix of the (Scaled) T=T(c) Ising Model with Magnetic Field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4, 4235 (1989)

    work page 1989

Showing first 80 references.