pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.20423 · v4 · submitted 2026-03-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · math-ph· math.MP· physics.data-an

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

From the Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem to a Superspace Diffusion Framework

Carolina Garcia , Luc\'ia Perea Dur\'an , Agnese Venezia , Alex Conradie
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 06:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPphysics.data-an
keywords stochastic embeddingsuperspace diffusiongravitational diffusion theoremfluctuation-dissipationtime series analysismetric diffusionPlanck scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

A non-parametric stochastic embedding theorem recovers fundamental constants from time series data across nine physics domains and derives a superspace diffusion equation for gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem extends embedding methods to stochastic processes, allowing recovery of both drift and diffusion terms solely from scalar time series without assuming the underlying equations. When applied to data from classical mechanics through quantum electrodynamics, the method extracts the Boltzmann constant, Planck constant, speed of light, and other constants in both channels, revealing a consistent pattern called the sigma-continuum. From this, the authors derive the Gravitational Diffusion Theorem, which fixes the diffusion coefficient for the spacetime metric at one Planck length per square root of Planck time, leading to the superspace diffusion hypothesis whose coarse-grained predictions can be tested against galactic kinematics.

Core claim

The central discovery is the superspace diffusion hypothesis, dg_ij = D_ij[g] dτ + ℓ_P dW_ij, where the drift D and diffusion amplitude ℓ_P follow uniquely from four axioms that encode the fluctuation-dissipation relation, the massless mode structure of linearized gravity, and gravitational self-coupling through the equivalence principle.

What carries the argument

The Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem, a generalization of Takens' delay-coordinate embedding to stochastic systems that non-parametrically reconstructs the governing drift and diffusion fields from observations.

If this is right

  • Fundamental constants such as k_B, ħ, and c appear in the recovered drift and diffusion without being supplied in advance.
  • The recovered diffusion coefficients form an empirical σ-continuum in which the constants occupy structurally distinct roles.
  • Coarse-graining the superspace Fokker-Planck equation via Mori-Zwanzig projection produces testable predictions for gravitational acceleration on galactic scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the framework holds, it may provide a first-principles route to emergent gravity without assuming a metric a priori.
  • The same embedding procedure could be applied to cosmological time series to constrain the diffusion coefficient at larger scales.
  • The approach suggests that noise in the metric might be observable in precision timing or interferometry experiments.

Load-bearing premise

That the Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem applies without prior assumptions about the governing physics to all nine listed domains.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the galactic-scale gravitational acceleration predicted by coarse-graining the superspace Fokker-Planck equation and the accelerations measured from stellar kinematic data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.20423 by Agnese Venezia, Alex Conradie, Carolina Garcia, Luc\'ia Perea Dur\'an.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The σ-Continuum. Recovered diffusion coefficient σ across all nine physical domains and the derived gravita￾tional value, displayed on a logarithmic vertical axis (log10 σ, schematic units). Each domain is represented by a distinct marker shape and colour, labelled with its recovered σ expression. Deterministic domains (C1: classical mechanics, dark blue circle; C6: classical electromagnetism, light blue c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: C1: Mercury’s Perihelion Precession (σ = 0). (a) Cumulative precession (arcsec) over ∼1000 orbits. The GR precession series (solid green, σ = 0) and the autonomous free-run forecast (dashed blue with 95% CI band) overlap to within line width, confirming that the pipeline recovers the deterministic precession rate without residual stochastic content. (b) Histogram of locally recovered diffusion values σˆ(x)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: C4: Wavepacket ℏ Recovery (σ ≈ 0). (a) Wavepacket width σ(t) as a function of normalised time t/τ (where τ = 2mσ2 0 /ℏ): the Schrödinger evolution (solid blue), the analytical prediction σ0 p 1 + (t/τ) 2 (dotted blue), and the deterministic free-run forecast (dashed blue with 95% CI band). The pipeline is trained on the first half; the forecast tracks the second half. (b) The product µˆ(t) · σ(t) versus no… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: C2: Brownian Motion (σ = p 2γkBT /m). (a) Langevin velocity time series v(t) (orange, mm/s) over 60 µs. The pipeline is trained on the first 30 µs; the ensemble prediction (blue with 95% CI band) runs from 30–60 µs, with the faint orange continuation showing the true trajectory. The grey dotted line marks the training boundary. (b) Recovered diffusion profile σˆ(v) versus velocity (blue with SEM band). The… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: C3: Radioactive Decay (σ 2 = µ, Fano = 1). (a) Poisson count series at λ = 3000 (purple) over 10 000 measurements. The blue solid line marks the pipeline-recovered mean; the blue dashed lines mark the ±1.96ˆσ confidence interval. (b) MZ-corrected σˆ 2 versus mean count µ on log–log axes (blue circles) across five count levels from µ = 100 to µ = 10 000. The purple dashed line is the Poisson prediction σ 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: C8: Quantum Harmonic Oscillator (σ = p γℏω/m). (a) Simulated velocity time series v(t) of the damped QHO (blue) over ∼300 ps, with the pipeline-recovered local drift (gold, k-NN with embedding dimension m∗ = 5). The drift smoothly tracks the oscillatory dynamics. (b) Probability density of locally recovered σˆ(x) values across the correlation manifold (blue bars). The gold dashed line marks the theoretical… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: C5: Van Kampen Scaling (σ ∝ Ω−1/2). (a) Concentration time series c = n/Ω at system size Ω = 500 (teal) with the autonomous free-run forecast (dashed blue with 95% CI band). Fluctuations around ceq = kb/kd = 1 are characteristic of the birth–death process at finite system size. (b) The Van Kampen scaling law: MZ-corrected σˆ versus system size Ω on log–log axes (blue circles) across seven system sizes (Ω ∈… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: C6/C7: The Relativistic Hinge. C6: Electromagnetism (σ = 0): (a) Peak position of a classical EM wavepacket (red) with the autonomous free-run forecast (dashed blue with 95% CI band). The pipeline recovers c/c ˆ = 1.000000. (b) Histogram of recovered |σˆ| for the EM wave (blue bars, density-normalised). The red dashed line marks σ = 0; the blue solid line marks the median. Near-zero values confirm determin… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: C9: QED Photon Field (σ = c √γ; ℏ and ω cancel). (a) Mode velocity v(t) of the photon field at reference frequency ω0 = 1 in natural units (green), with the pipeline-recovered local drift (light blue). The oscillatory dynamics are governed by ω 2x in the spring force, while the drift channel recovers only the dissipative component µ = −γv. (b) Probability density of locally recovered σˆ(x) values (blue bar… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A generalisation of Takens' delay-coordinate embedding theorem to stochastic systems, the Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem, is an inverse methodology enabling non-parametric recovery of both drift and diffusion fields from scalar time series without prior assumptions about the governing physics. A blind protocol using only time series data is applied to nine domains: classical mechanics, statistical mechanics, nuclear physics, quantum mechanics, chemical kinetics, electromagnetism, relativistic quantum mechanics, quantum harmonic oscillator dynamics, and quantum electrodynamics. Fundamental constants (the Boltzmann constant, the Planck constant, the speed of light, the Fano factor, and the Van Kampen scaling exponent) emerge in both drift and diffusion channels without prior specification. The recovered diffusion coefficients, viewed across domains, constitute an empirical pattern, the $\sigma$-continuum, in which $k_B$, $\hbar$, and $c$ play structurally distinct roles. The Gravitational Diffusion Theorem, derived from the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, massless mode structure of linearised gravity, and gravitational self-coupling via the equivalence principle, determines the gravitational diffusion coefficient as one Planck length per square root of Planck time. Four canonical axioms formalise the framework, within which the noise character, drift, covariance operator, and fluctuation amplitude are uniquely determined by theorem, yielding the superspace diffusion hypothesis: $\mathrm{d}g_{ij} = \mathcal{D}_{ij}[g]\,\mathrm{d}\tau + \ell_P\,\mathrm{d}W_{ij}$ where all coefficients are non-parametric, first-principles consequences of the axioms. An implication of the hypothesis is that coarse-graining of the superspace Fokker-Planck equation via Mori-Zwanzig projection yields predictions for galactic-scale gravitational acceleration testable against kinematic data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes Takens' delay-coordinate embedding theorem to stochastic systems via the Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem, which is claimed to recover drift and diffusion fields non-parametrically from scalar time series. It applies a blind protocol to nine physical domains (classical mechanics through QED), recovering fundamental constants (k_B, ħ, c, Fano factor, Van Kampen exponent) in both channels without prior specification. These recoveries are said to form an empirical σ-continuum pattern. A Gravitational Diffusion Theorem, derived from fluctuation-dissipation, linearised gravity modes, and equivalence-principle self-coupling, fixes the gravitational diffusion amplitude at one Planck length per square root Planck time. Four canonical axioms are introduced to close the framework, yielding the superspace diffusion hypothesis dg_ij = D_ij[g] dτ + ℓ_P dW_ij with all coefficients non-parametric; coarse-graining via Mori-Zwanzig is asserted to produce testable galactic-scale gravitational predictions.

Significance. If the central derivations were rigorously established and the non-parametric recoveries verified without hidden scaling, the work would offer a unified stochastic-embedding route to fundamental constants and a parameter-free diffusion model on superspace. The claimed implication for galactic kinematics would constitute a falsifiable prediction outside standard ΛCDM. However, the absence of explicit intermediate steps for the Gravitational Diffusion Theorem and the uniqueness proof from the four axioms substantially weakens the significance assessment at present.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Gravitational Diffusion Theorem] Abstract and Gravitational Diffusion Theorem statement: the precise coefficient ℓ_P (one Planck length per √Planck time) is asserted to follow uniquely from the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, massless-mode structure of linearised gravity, and equivalence-principle self-coupling, yet no intermediate steps, explicit covariance operator, or projection isolating the amplitude are supplied. This derivation is load-bearing for the claim that the superspace hypothesis contains no free parameters.
  2. [Abstract / Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem] Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem and nine-domain application: the theorem is stated to recover constants without prior physics assumptions, but the manuscript provides neither the proof of the theorem nor the explicit time-series protocols, error bars, or verification that scaling was not imported from dimensional analysis or embedding results of other domains. This undercuts the σ-continuum pattern and the assertion of uniqueness.
  3. [Abstract / Four canonical axioms] Four canonical axioms: these are introduced to determine noise character, drift, covariance operator, and fluctuation amplitude by theorem, yet the manuscript does not exhibit the explicit closure (e.g., how the axioms fix the Wiener process amplitude independently of the embedding results). Without this, the superspace hypothesis dg_ij = D_ij[g] dτ + ℓ_P dW_ij remains an assertion rather than a derived consequence.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: the time variable τ in the superspace equation is not defined relative to coordinate time or proper time; a brief clarification would aid readability.
  2. [Abstract] The term “σ-continuum” is introduced as an empirical pattern but lacks a precise mathematical definition or a figure/table summarising the recovered diffusion coefficients across the nine domains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive report. The comments correctly identify places where explicit derivations and protocols must be supplied to make the central claims self-contained. We will revise the manuscript to address each point, adding the missing intermediate steps, proof outlines, and verification details without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Gravitational Diffusion Theorem] Abstract and Gravitational Diffusion Theorem statement: the precise coefficient ℓ_P (one Planck length per √Planck time) is asserted to follow uniquely from the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, massless-mode structure of linearised gravity, and equivalence-principle self-coupling, yet no intermediate steps, explicit covariance operator, or projection isolating the amplitude are supplied. This derivation is load-bearing for the claim that the superspace hypothesis contains no free parameters.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation of the amplitude ℓ_P requires explicit intermediate steps. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection (new Section 4.2) that derives the coefficient from the fluctuation-dissipation relation applied to the massless modes of linearised gravity, incorporates the equivalence-principle self-coupling to fix the projection onto the superspace metric, and isolates the covariance operator whose eigenvalue yields exactly one Planck length per square-root Planck time. The revised text will also state the uniqueness condition under the four axioms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem] Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem and nine-domain application: the theorem is stated to recover constants without prior physics assumptions, but the manuscript provides neither the proof of the theorem nor the explicit time-series protocols, error bars, or verification that scaling was not imported from dimensional analysis or embedding results of other domains. This undercuts the σ-continuum pattern and the assertion of uniqueness.

    Authors: The full proof of the Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem appears in Appendix A, yet we accept that the main text lacks a self-contained outline and the nine-domain protocol details. We will add a concise proof sketch to Section 2, together with a new table (Table 1) listing the recovered constants, their statistical uncertainties, and the data-driven embedding-parameter selection procedure. We will also include a supplementary verification that no external scaling was imported; all recoveries used only the raw time series and the theorem’s internal sufficiency conditions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract / Four canonical axioms] Four canonical axioms: these are introduced to determine noise character, drift, covariance operator, and fluctuation amplitude by theorem, yet the manuscript does not exhibit the explicit closure (e.g., how the axioms fix the Wiener process amplitude independently of the embedding results). Without this, the superspace hypothesis dg_ij = D_ij[g] dτ + ℓ_P dW_ij remains an assertion rather than a derived consequence.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit closure from the four axioms to the Wiener-process amplitude must be shown. In the revision we will expand Section 5 to include a step-by-step derivation demonstrating how Axiom 1 (noise character) and Axiom 4 (fluctuation amplitude) together fix the diffusion coefficient ℓ_P independently of the embedding recoveries, while Axioms 2 and 3 determine the drift and covariance operator. The revised text will present the resulting superspace equation as a direct theorem consequence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Axioms introduced to force superspace diffusion hypothesis by theorem; gravitational coefficient fixed to Planck scale via fluctuation-dissipation and equivalence principle

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract, paragraph introducing four canonical axioms]
    "Four canonical axioms formalise the framework, within which the noise character, drift, covariance operator, and fluctuation amplitude are uniquely determined by theorem, yielding the superspace diffusion hypothesis: dg_ij = D_ij[g] dτ + ℓ_P dW_ij where all coefficients are non-parametric, first-principles consequences of the axioms."

    The axioms are presented as the formalisation step whose sole purpose is to guarantee that the superspace hypothesis (including the precise ℓ_P coefficient) follows uniquely by theorem. This makes the claimed first-principles derivation equivalent to the choice of axioms that already encode the target form and amplitude.

  2. self definitional [Abstract, Gravitational Diffusion Theorem sentence]
    "The Gravitational Diffusion Theorem, derived from the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, massless mode structure of linearised gravity, and gravitational self-coupling via the equivalence principle, determines the gravitational diffusion coefficient as one Planck length per square root of Planck time."

    The theorem is stated to fix the exact numerical coefficient ℓ_P directly from fluctuation-dissipation plus equivalence principle. These inputs are standard relations whose direct consequence is the Planck scale; no intermediate steps are supplied showing how the axioms close the derivation without importing the known dimensional result.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain reduces to two load-bearing steps that match the self-definitional pattern. First, four axioms are explicitly introduced to make the superspace form follow uniquely by theorem, with all coefficients declared non-parametric consequences of those axioms. Second, the Gravitational Diffusion Theorem is invoked to set the exact amplitude ℓ_P to one Planck length per square root Planck time using only fluctuation-dissipation, linearised gravity modes, and equivalence principle; this directly re-expresses the known Planck units without additional independent derivation shown. The nine-domain empirical pattern recovers standard constants but does not independently constrain the superspace extension. No external machine-checked result or parameter-free closure is supplied to break the reduction. The result is therefore forced by the axiomatic premises and standard scaling relations rather than derived from them.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on four newly introduced axioms that are stated to determine all components by theorem, plus the Gravitational Diffusion Theorem derived from fluctuation-dissipation and equivalence principle; no free parameters are listed but the framework introduces the superspace diffusion concept without external falsifiable handles beyond the stated implications.

axioms (1)
  • ad hoc to paper Four canonical axioms formalise the framework
    These axioms are invoked to uniquely determine the noise character, drift, covariance operator, and fluctuation amplitude by theorem.
invented entities (2)
  • superspace diffusion hypothesis no independent evidence
    purpose: to describe metric evolution in superspace as a stochastic process
    Postulated from the four axioms and Gravitational Diffusion Theorem as the central equation dg_ij = D_ij[g] dτ + ℓ_P dW_ij.
  • σ-continuum no independent evidence
    purpose: to organize the empirical pattern of recovered diffusion coefficients across domains
    Observed from applications of the Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1738 out tokens · 50660 ms · 2026-05-15T06:45:05.063657+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abarbanel,Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996

    H.D.I. Abarbanel,Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Aït-Sahalia, J

    Y. Aït-Sahalia, J. Jacod,Estimating the degree of activity of jumps in high frequency data, The Annals of Statistics37(5A) (2009) 2202–2244

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Bach,On the equivalence between kernel quadrature rules and random feature expansions, Journal of Machine Learning Research18(21) (2017) 1–38

    F. Bach,On the equivalence between kernel quadrature rules and random feature expansions, Journal of Machine Learning Research18(21) (2017) 1–38

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Barreira, Y

    L. Barreira, Y. Pesin,Dimension and Recurrence in Hyperbolic Dynamics, Progress in Mathematics272(Birkhäuser, Basel, 2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Berry, J

    T. Berry, J. Harlim,Variable bandwidth diffusion kernels, Applied and Computational Har- monic Analysis40(1) (2015) 68–96. Supplemental Material: Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem 90

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Bialek, I

    W. Bialek, I. Nemenman, N. Tishby,Predictability, complexity, and learning, Neural Com- putation13(11) (2001) 2409–2463

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Boninsegna, F

    L. Boninsegna, F. Nüske, C. Clementi,Sparse learning of stochastic dynamical equations, Journal of Chemical Physics148(24) (2018) 241723

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Botvinick-Greenhouse, R

    J. Botvinick-Greenhouse, R. Martin, Y. Yang,Invariant Measures in Time-Delay Coordi- nates for Unique Dynamical System Identification, Physical Review Letters135(16) (2025) 068301

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Bouchaud, M

    J.-P. Bouchaud, M. Potters,Theory of Financial Risk and Derivative Pricing: From Sta- tistical Physics to Risk Management, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Breakspear,Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity, Nature Neuroscience20(3) (2017) 340–352

    M. Breakspear,Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity, Nature Neuroscience20(3) (2017) 340–352

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Broomhead, G.P

    D.S. Broomhead, G.P. King,Extracting qualitative dynamics from experimental data, Phys- ica D: Nonlinear Phenomena20(2–3) (1986) 217–236

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    Brezis,Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer, New York, 2011

    H. Brezis,Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer, New York, 2011

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Brunton, B.W

    S.L. Brunton, B.W. Brunton, J.L. Proctor, J.N. Kutz,Koopman invariant subspaces and finite linear representations of nonlinear dynamical systems for control, PLoS ONE11(2) (2016) e0150171

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Budišić, R

    M. Budišić, R. Mohr, I. Mezić,Applied Koopmanism, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science22(4) (2012) 047510

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Casdagli,Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 35(3) (1989) 335–356

    M. Casdagli,Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 35(3) (1989) 335–356

    work page 1989

  16. [16]

    R.T.Q. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, D.K. Duvenaud,Neural ordinary differential equations, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), 2018, pp. 6571–6583

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Chorin, O.H

    A.J. Chorin, O.H. Hald, R. Kupferman,Optimal prediction and the Mori-Zwanzig repre- sentation of irreversible processes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences97(7) (2000) 2968–2973

    work page 2000

  18. [18]

    Cont,Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues, Quanti- tative Finance1(2) (2001) 223–236

    R. Cont,Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues, Quanti- tative Finance1(2) (2001) 223–236

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    T.M.Cover, J.A.Thomas,Elements of Information Theory, 2ndedition, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2006

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Dakos, S.R

    V. Dakos, S.R. Carpenter, W.A. Brock, A.M. Ellison, V. Guttal, A.R. Ives, S. Kéfi, V. Livina, D.A. Seekell, E.H. van Nes, M. Scheffer,Methods for detecting early warnings of critical transitions in time series illustrated using simulated ecological data, PLoS ONE7(7) (2012) e41010

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Deco, V.K

    G. Deco, V.K. Jirsa, P.A. Robinson, M. Breakspear, K. Friston,The dynamic brain: From spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields, PLoS Computational Biology4(8) (2008) e1000092

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Dijkstra,Nonlinear Climate Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013

    H.A. Dijkstra,Nonlinear Climate Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. Supplemental Material: Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem 91

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Duvenaud, H

    D. Duvenaud, H. Nickisch, C.E. Rasmussen,Additive Gaussian processes, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2011, pp. 226–234

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Eckmann, D

    J.-P. Eckmann, D. Ruelle,Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics57(3) (1985) 617–656

    work page 1985

  25. [25]

    Emery,Stochastic Calculus in Manifolds(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989)

    M. Emery,Stochastic Calculus in Manifolds(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989)

    work page 1989

  26. [26]

    Falconer,Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2014

    K. Falconer,Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2014

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Farmer, E

    J.D. Farmer, E. Ott, J.A. Yorke,The dimension of chaotic attractors, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena7(1–3) (1983) 153–180

    work page 1983

  28. [28]

    Farmer, J.J

    J.D. Farmer, J.J. Sidorowich,Predicting chaotic time series, Physical Review Letters59(8) (1987) 845–848

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    Federer,Geometric Measure Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969

    H. Federer,Geometric Measure Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969

    work page 1969

  30. [30]

    G. B. Folland,Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1999

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    Fraser, H.L

    A.M. Fraser, H.L. Swinney,Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information, Physical Review A33(2) (1986) 1134–1140

    work page 1986

  32. [32]

    Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N

    U. Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1995

    work page 1995

  33. [33]

    Ghil, M.D

    M. Ghil, M.D. Chekroun, E. Simonnet,Climate dynamics and fluid mechanics: Natural variability and related uncertainties, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena237(14–17) (2008) 2111–2126

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Givon, R

    D. Givon, R. Kupferman, A. Stuart,Extracting macroscopic dynamics: Model problems and algorithms, Nonlinearity17(6) (2004) R55–R127

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    Grassberger, I

    P. Grassberger, I. Procaccia,Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena9(1–2) (1983) 189–208

    work page 1983

  36. [36]

    Grassberger, I

    P. Grassberger, I. Procaccia,Characterization of strange attractors, Physical Review Letters 50(5) (1983) 346–349

    work page 1983

  37. [37]

    Guckenheimer, P

    J. Guckenheimer, P. Holmes,Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983

    work page 1983

  38. [38]

    Györfi, M

    L. Györfi, M. Kohler, A. Krzyżak, H. Walk,A Distribution-Free Theory of Nonparametric Regression, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002

    work page 2002

  39. [39]

    Hairer,On Malliavin’s proof of Hörmander’s theorem, Bulletin des Sciences Mathéma- tiques135(6–7) (2011) 650–666

    M. Hairer,On Malliavin’s proof of Hörmander’s theorem, Bulletin des Sciences Mathéma- tiques135(6–7) (2011) 650–666

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Hasselmann,Stochastic climate models Part I

    K. Hasselmann,Stochastic climate models Part I. Theory, Tellus28(6) (1976) 473–485

    work page 1976

  41. [41]

    Hirsch,Differential Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics33(Springer, New York, 1976)

    M.W. Hirsch,Differential Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics33(Springer, New York, 1976)

    work page 1976

  42. [42]

    Hörmander,Hypoelliptic second order differential equations, Acta Mathematica119(1) (1967) 147–171

    L. Hörmander,Hypoelliptic second order differential equations, Acta Mathematica119(1) (1967) 147–171. Supplemental Material: Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem 92

    work page 1967

  43. [43]

    Hsu,Stochastic Analysis on Manifolds(American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002)

    E.P. Hsu,Stochastic Analysis on Manifolds(American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002)

    work page 2002

  44. [44]

    almost every

    B.R. Hunt, T. Sauer, J.A. Yorke,Prevalence: a translation-invariant “almost every” on infinite-dimensional spaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)27, 217–238 (1992)

    work page 1992

  45. [45]

    echo state

    H. Jaeger,The "echo state" approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks, GMD Report 148, German National Research Center for Information Technology, 2001

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    Kantz, T

    H. Kantz, T. Schreiber,Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    Karatzas, S.E

    I. Karatzas, S.E. Shreve,Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd edition, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1991

    work page 1991

  48. [48]

    Katok, B

    A. Katok, B. Hasselblatt,Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    Kennel, R

    M.B. Kennel, R. Brown, H.D.I. Abarbanel,Determining embedding dimension for phase- space reconstruction using a geometrical construction, PhysicalReviewA45(6)(1992)3403– 3411

    work page 1992

  50. [50]

    Kidger, J

    P. Kidger, J. Morrill, J. Foster, T. Lyons,Neural controlled differential equations for irregu- lar time series, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020), 2020, pp. 6696–6707

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Kunita,Stochastic Flows and Stochastic Differential Equations(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)

    H. Kunita,Stochastic Flows and Stochastic Differential Equations(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)

    work page 1990

  52. [52]

    J.N.Kutz, S.L.Brunton, B.W.Brunton, J.L.Proctor,Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data- Driven Modeling of Complex Systems, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2016

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    Lehnertz, R.G

    K. Lehnertz, R.G. Andrzejak, J. Arnhold, T. Kreuz, F. Mormann, C. Rieke, G. Widman, C.E. Elger,Nonlinear EEG analysis in epilepsy: Its possible use for interictal focus localiza- tion, seizure anticipation, and prevention, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology18(3) (2001) 209–222

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    Part I: Characterization of measures satisfying Pesin’s entropy formula, Ann

    F.Ledrappier, L.-S.Young,The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms. Part I: Characterization of measures satisfying Pesin’s entropy formula, Ann. Math.122, 509–539 (1985)

    work page 1985

  55. [55]

    Ledrappier, L.-S

    F. Ledrappier, L.-S. Young,The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms. Part II: Relations between entropy, exponents and dimension, Ann. Math.122, 540–574 (1985)

    work page 1985

  56. [56]

    Léandre,Minoration en temps petit de la densité d’une diffusion dégénérée, J

    R. Léandre,Minoration en temps petit de la densité d’une diffusion dégénérée, J. Funct. Anal.74, 399–414 (1987)

    work page 1987

  57. [57]

    Li, T.-K

    X. Li, T.-K. Wong, R.T.Q. Chen, D. Duvenaud,Scalable gradients for stochastic differential equations, in: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS 2020), 2020, pp. 3870–3882

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Lorenz,Deterministic nonperiodic flow, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences20(2) (1963) 130–141

    E.N. Lorenz,Deterministic nonperiodic flow, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences20(2) (1963) 130–141

    work page 1963

  59. [59]

    Lukoševičius, H

    M. Lukoševičius, H. Jaeger,Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training, Computer Science Review3(3) (2009) 127–149. Supplemental Material: Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem 93

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Malkov, D.A

    Y.A. Malkov, D.A. Yashunin,Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphs, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence42(4) (2020) 824–836

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Malliavin,Stochastic Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

    P. Malliavin,Stochastic Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

    work page 1997

  62. [62]

    Mattila,Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces: Fractals and Rectifiability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    P. Mattila,Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces: Fractals and Rectifiability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    work page 1995

  63. [63]

    Meiss,Differential Dynamical Systems, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2007

    J.D. Meiss,Differential Dynamical Systems, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2007

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Mezić,Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions, Nonlinear Dynamics41(1–3) (2005) 309–325

    I. Mezić,Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions, Nonlinear Dynamics41(1–3) (2005) 309–325

    work page 2005

  65. [65]

    Montgomery,A Tour of Subriemannian Geometries, Their Geodesics and Applications, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs91(American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002)

    R. Montgomery,A Tour of Subriemannian Geometries, Their Geodesics and Applications, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs91(American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002)

    work page 2002

  66. [66]

    Nualart,The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006

    D. Nualart,The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006

    work page 2006

  67. [67]

    Øksendal,Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications, 6th ed

    B. Øksendal,Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications, 6th ed. (Springer, 2003)

    work page 2003

  68. [68]

    Pavliotis,Stochastic Processes and Applications: Diffusion Processes, the Fokker- Planck and Langevin Equations, Springer, New York, 2014

    G.A. Pavliotis,Stochastic Processes and Applications: Diffusion Processes, the Fokker- Planck and Langevin Equations, Springer, New York, 2014

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Pesin,Dimension Theory in Dynamical Systems: Contemporary Views and Applica- tions, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997)

    Ya.B. Pesin,Dimension Theory in Dynamical Systems: Contemporary Views and Applica- tions, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997)

    work page 1997

  70. [70]

    Petersen,Ergodic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983

    K. Petersen,Ergodic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983

    work page 1983

  71. [71]

    Pope,Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    S.B. Pope,Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    work page 2000

  72. [72]

    Rasmussen, C.K.I

    C.E. Rasmussen, C.K.I. Williams,Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    Robinson,A topological delay embedding theorem for infinite-dimensional dynamical systems, Nonlinearity18(5) (2005) 2135–2143

    J.C. Robinson,A topological delay embedding theorem for infinite-dimensional dynamical systems, Nonlinearity18(5) (2005) 2135–2143

    work page 2005

  74. [74]

    T.Sauer, J.A.Yorke, M.Casdagli,Embedology, JournalofStatisticalPhysics65(3–4)(1991) 579–616

    work page 1991

  75. [75]

    Scheffer, J

    M. Scheffer, J. Bascompte, W.A. Brock, V. Brovkin, S.R. Carpenter, V. Dakos, H. Held, E.H. van Nes, M. Rietkerk, G. Sugihara,Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature461(7260) (2009) 53–59

    work page 2009

  76. [76]

    Schmid,Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, Journal of Fluid Mechanics656(2010) 5–28

    P.J. Schmid,Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, Journal of Fluid Mechanics656(2010) 5–28

    work page 2010

  77. [77]

    Seeger, T

    A. Seeger, T. Kakade, and D. Foster. Information consistency of nonparametric Gaussian process methods.IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 54(5):2376–2382, 2008

    work page 2008

  78. [78]

    Sparrow,The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1982

    C. Sparrow,The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1982

    work page 1982

  79. [79]

    Sreenivasan,Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics23(1) (1991) 539–604

    K.R. Sreenivasan,Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics23(1) (1991) 539–604. Supplemental Material: Stochastic Embedding Sufficiency Theorem 94

    work page 1991

  80. [80]

    Stark, D.S

    J. Stark, D.S. Broomhead, M.E. Davies, J. Huke,Delay embeddings for forced systems. II. Stochastic forcing, Journal of Nonlinear Science13(6) (2003) 519–577

    work page 2003

Showing first 80 references.