Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Magnetic moments of open bottom-charm molecular pentaquarks split sharply by light-diquark symmetry, giving clean electromagnetic fingerprints of their internal structure.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 16:49 UTC pith:LYHHCXZY

load-bearing objection Solid, fully explicit CQM calculation of open b¯c/c¯b molecular-octet magnetic moments; the hierarchy is algebraically clean once the S-wave molecular premise is granted. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.27657 v2 pith:LYHHCXZY submitted 2026-03-29 hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-exnucl-th

Magnetic moments of open bottom--charm molecular pentaquark octets

classification hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-exnucl-th
keywords open heavy-flavor pentaquarksmagnetic momentsmolecular pentaquarksSU(3) flavor octetslight diquarkheavy-quark flavor symmetry breakingconstituent quark modelbottom-charm exotics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates magnetic moments for open heavy-flavor pentaquarks built from a bottom and a charm quark (b c-bar qqq and c b-bar qqq) under the assumption that they are S-wave molecules of a heavy baryon and a heavy-light meson. It constructs the full spin-flavor wave functions for the two SU(3) flavor octets that arise from symmetric versus antisymmetric light-diquark arrangements, then evaluates the moments for the lowest spin-parity configurations in the constituent quark model. The central result is a clear hierarchy: when the light diquark is spin-singlet (the 8_2f multiplet), the pseudoscalar-channel moments collapse to two universal values fixed almost entirely by the heavy quark inside the baryon; when the diquark is spin-triplet (the 8_1f multiplet), the moments scatter widely and frequently change sign. Interchanging bottom and charm further breaks heavy-quark flavor symmetry in a way that is directly visible in the electromagnetic numbers. These tabulated moments are offered as concrete benchmarks that future experiments can use to diagnose whether a newly observed state belongs to one multiplet or the other and what its spin configuration is.

Core claim

In the 8_2f representation the 1/2+ ⊗ 0− states of open bottom-charm molecular pentaquarks possess essentially universal magnetic moments (≈ −0.062 μ_N for the entire b c-bar family and ≈ +0.362 μ_N for the c b-bar family) because the antisymmetric light diquark is a spin singlet and therefore contributes nothing; the 8_1f representation, built on a symmetric light diquark, produces a broad spectrum of moments with frequent sign changes, while the b c-bar versus c b-bar differences demonstrate explicit heavy-quark flavor symmetry breaking in electromagnetic observables.

What carries the argument

Explicitly constructed SU(3)_f spin-flavor wave functions for the two octets 8_1f (symmetric light diquark) and 8_2f (antisymmetric light diquark), evaluated as expectation values of the quark-spin magnetic-moment operator inside an S-wave baryon-meson molecule.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation treats the states as pure S-wave molecules of a singly-heavy baryon and a heavy-light meson, so that the orbital contribution vanishes and the total moment is simply the sum of the constituent moments; if the states are compact, contain large D-wave pieces, or are not bound, the numbers lose their meaning.

What would settle it

A measured magnetic moment (or a transition moment extracted from a radiative width) for any open bottom-charm pentaquark candidate that fails to match either the universal 8_2f value or the corresponding 8_1f entry in the tables would falsify the molecular spin-flavor assignment used here.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • An observed magnetic moment near −0.062 μ_N (or +0.362 μ_N) would immediately tag a state as belonging to the 8_2f multiplet with a spin-singlet light diquark.
  • Large, sign-changing moments would favor the 8_1f multiplet and thereby diagnose the light-diquark symmetry of the state.
  • The systematic splitting between J = 1/2 and J = 3/2 moments from the same hadronic channel supplies an independent electromagnetic handle on spin assignment.
  • The tabulated numbers give concrete targets for radiative-transition and production-asymmetry searches at LHCb, Belle II, and a future Electron-Ion Collider.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the universal 8_2f moments are carried almost entirely by a single heavy quark, they should be relatively insensitive to the precise light-quark mass scheme and could serve as a clean cross-check of the molecular picture itself.
  • The same wave-function machinery could be reused for transition magnetic moments between different spin-parity channels, which are the quantities that actually control radiative widths and are therefore more experimentally accessible.
  • If lattice QCD or future amplitude analyses confirm the existence of near-threshold open bottom-charm states, the magnetic-moment hierarchy predicted here becomes a sharp test of whether those states are molecular rather than compact.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes magnetic moments of open bottom–charm molecular pentaquarks (b¯cqqq and c¯bqqq) treated as S-wave baryon–meson bound states. Complete SU(3)_f spin–flavor wave functions are constructed for the two octets 8_1f (symmetric light diquark) and 8_2f (antisymmetric light diquark), and the non-relativistic constituent-quark magnetic-moment operator is evaluated for J^P = 1/2^-(1/2^+ ⊗ 0^-) and J^P = 1/2^-, 3/2^-(1/2^+ ⊗ 1^-). The central claim is a clear hierarchy: 8_2f pseudoscalar states have essentially universal moments (μ ≈ -0.062 μ_N for b¯c, +0.362 μ_N for c¯b) because the spin-singlet light diquark and spin-0 meson suppress light-quark contributions, while 8_1f states show a broad spectrum with frequent sign changes; differences between the b¯c and c¯b families encode heavy-quark flavor symmetry breaking. Results are tabulated for all octet members and offered as electromagnetic benchmarks for future LHCb/Belle II searches.

Significance. If the pure S-wave molecular premise is accepted, the work supplies the first systematic, fully explicit set of magnetic-moment predictions for the open bottom–charm octet sector. The hierarchy (universal 8_2f versus dispersed 8_1f, plus the b¯c/c¯b sign flip) is a direct algebraic consequence of the wave functions and is therefore robust and falsifiable. The complete spin–flavor tables are a reusable resource, and the numerical results give concrete electromagnetic discriminants for flavor representation and spin assignment once candidates are observed. Strengths include parameter-free evaluation once literature constituent masses are fixed, transparent connection of the universal 8_2f moments to μ_b and μ_c, and honest discussion of experimental limitations (static moments inaccessible; radiative widths require transition moments left for future work).

major comments (2)
  1. Section III, Eq. (20): the worked example for P2_b¯c(8_1f) in the 1/2^+ ⊗ 0^- channel is algebraically incorrect and inconsistent with Table III. Evaluating the printed expression with the paper’s own quark masses yields ≈ -0.63 μ_N, not the tabulated -0.555 μ_N. The correct result follows from μ = (1/3)μ({ud}b) + (2/3)μ({dd}b) with free-baryon moments and vanishing pseudoscalar-meson moment, giving (2μ_u + 10μ_d - 3μ_b)/9 = -0.555 μ_N. The claim that Eq. (20) is “in agreement with the expression used in the numerical analysis” is therefore false. The illustrative derivation must be corrected (or replaced by the compact hadronic formula) so that a reader can reproduce the tables from the stated operator and wave functions.
  2. Section III and Tables III–IV: while the 8_2f vector-channel entries can be verified independently with standard Clebsch–Gordan recoupling (μ_J=3/2 = μ_B + μ_M, μ_J=1/2 = -μ_B/3 + 2μ_M/3) and match the tables, no analogous worked example is given for any 8_1f vector state. Because the only fully expanded quark-level derivation in the text is erroneous, the 8_1f vector results remain harder to audit. A short, correct derivation for one 8_1f vector multiplet (or an explicit statement that all entries are obtained from free-hadron moments plus CG coefficients) is needed to make the numerical claims fully reproducible.
minor comments (6)
  1. Section IV / Tables III–IV: quote the elementary quark moments μ_q (in μ_N) that follow from the adopted masses, or give the conversion factor m_p/m_q explicitly, so that the universal 8_2f values -0.062 and +0.362 can be checked at a glance.
  2. Section IV: a one-paragraph sensitivity check (e.g., varying m_u,d,s,c,b within typical ranges used in the literature) would quantify how stable the hierarchy and sign patterns are under the only free inputs.
  3. Figure 1 source text contains corrupted glyphs (�) in several panels; the published figure should be regenerated from a clean source.
  4. Abstract and Section IV: the phrase “near-universal” is slightly misleading for the 8_2f pseudoscalar channel—within the model the values are exactly identical for all eight states; “universal” is more accurate.
  5. Section II: a brief remark that the spatial wave function is assumed identical for all channels (so that only spin–flavor matrix elements matter) would clarify why no radial integrals appear.
  6. References: a few recent lattice or QCD-sum-rule studies of open heavy pentaquarks could be added for context, but this is optional.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: magnetic moments are direct algebraic evaluations of the non-relativistic spin operator on explicitly constructed molecular spin-flavor wave functions with fixed external quark masses.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Section II constructs the complete SU(3)_f spin-flavor wave functions for the 8_1f and 8_2f octets from symmetric/antisymmetric light-diquark configurations (Tables I-II); Section III applies the standard constituent-quark spin operator (Eq. 11) with vanishing orbital piece for pure S-wave molecules (Eq. 10); the numerical values in Tables III-IV follow by evaluating the linear combinations of elementary quark moments μ_q = Q_q/(2m_q) using fixed masses taken from the external literature [24]. No parameter is fitted to any pentaquark observable (none exist), no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the self-citations [22,23] supply only contextual comparison for hidden-bottom states. The striking hierarchy (near-universal 8_2f pseudoscalar moments versus broad 8_1f spectrum, plus b¯c/c¯b sign flip) is an exact algebraic consequence of the spin-singlet light diquark and the charge/mass difference between b and c; it is not forced by definition or by a self-citation chain. The molecular premise itself is an explicit modeling assumption motivated by independent dynamical calculations [25,26], not a circular input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central numerical claims rest on four fixed constituent masses taken from prior work, the standard non-relativistic magnetic-moment operator, the molecular S-wave factorization, and the SU(3)_f Clebsch–Gordan construction of the two octets. No new dynamical entity is postulated; the pentaquarks themselves are motivated by external coupled-channel calculations. The free-parameter count is therefore small and fully disclosed.

free parameters (1)
  • constituent quark masses m_u=m_d, m_s, m_c, m_b = m_u=m_d=361.8 MeV, m_s=540.4 MeV, m_c=1724.8 MeV, m_b=5052.9 MeV
    Taken from Ref. [24] and inserted without refitting; every numerical moment scales linearly with 1/m_q. Different mass schemes would shift all entries.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Open bottom–charm pentaquarks are pure S-wave molecular bound states of a singly-heavy baryon and a heavy-light meson, so the orbital magnetic moment vanishes.
    Stated in Section II and motivated by Refs. [25,26]; load-bearing for the reduction μ = μ_B + μ_M.
  • domain assumption Magnetic moments are given by the non-relativistic constituent-quark operator Σ_i (Q_i/2M_i) σ_i with no meson-cloud or relativistic corrections.
    Section III; standard in the literature but an uncontrolled approximation for loosely bound molecules.
  • standard math The two light quarks form either a symmetric (6_f) or antisymmetric (¯3_f) diquark, generating the orthogonal octets 8_1f and 8_2f via SU(3)_f Clebsch–Gordan coefficients.
    Section II, Eqs. (5)–(7); standard group theory.
  • domain assumption Color and spatial wave functions factorize and do not contribute additional magnetic-moment pieces for color-singlet S-wave molecules.
    Section II; conventional for molecular pictures.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 23672 in / 3063 out tokens · 34026 ms · 2026-07-13T16:49:24.312326+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive theoretical investigation of the magnetic moments of open heavy-flavor molecular pentaquarks with quark compositions $b\bar{c}qqq$ and $c\bar{b}qqq$ (where $q=u,d,s$). Employing a molecular picture in which the pentaquarks are treated as S-wave bound states of a heavy baryon and a meson, we systematically construct the complete spin--flavor wavefunctions for the two distinct SU(3)$_f$ octet representations, $8_{1f}$ and $8_{2f}$, arising from symmetric and antisymmetric light-diquark configurations, respectively. Within the framework of the constituent quark model, we calculate the magnetic moments of spin-parity configurations, $J^P = \frac{1}{2}^-(\frac{1}{2}^+\otimes 0^-)$ and $J^P = \frac{1}{2}^-, \frac{3}{2}^-(\frac{1}{2}^+\otimes 1^-)$, for each member of the $b\bar{c}$ and $c\bar{b}$ octets. Our results reveal a striking hierarchy: in the $8_{2f}$ representation, the $\frac{1}{2}^+\otimes 0^-$ states exhibit near-universal magnetic moments ($\mu \approx -0.062\,\mu_N$ for $b\bar{c}qqq$ and $\mu \approx +0.362\,\mu_N$ for $c\bar{b}qqq$), as a direct consequence of the spin-singlet light-diquark that suppresses light-quark contributions. In contrast, the $8_{1f}$ representation shows a broad spectrum of values with frequent sign changes, reflecting the active role of the symmetric light-diquark. The clear differences between the $b\bar{c}$ and $c\bar{b}$ families demonstrate explicit heavy-quark flavor symmetry breaking in electromagnetic observables. These predictions provide a detailed set of electromagnetic benchmarks that can serve as discriminants for the internal flavor structure and spin configuration of future experimentally observed open heavy-flavor pentaquarks, offering valuable guidance for ongoing and future searches at facilities such as LHCb and Belle II.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 29 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ 0 b →J/ψK −pDecays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ 0 b →J/ψK −pDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 072001 (2015), arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex]

  2. [2]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,P c(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of theP c(4450)+, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,P c(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of theP c(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 222001 (2019), arXiv:1904.03947 [hep-ex]

  3. [3]

    Gershon (LHCb), Exotic hadron naming convention 10.17181/CERN.7XZO.HPH7 (2022), arXiv:2206.15233 [hep-ex]

    T. Gershon (LHCb), Exotic hadron naming convention 10.17181/CERN.7XZO.HPH7 (2022), arXiv:2206.15233 [hep-ex]

  4. [4]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Evidence of aJ/ψΛ structure and observation of excited Ξ − states in the Ξ − b →J/ψΛK − decay, Sci

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Evidence of aJ/ψΛ structure and observation of excited Ξ − states in the Ξ − b →J/ψΛK − decay, Sci. Bull.66, 1278 (2021), arXiv:2012.10380 [hep-ex]

  5. [5]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of a J/ψΛ Resonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ψΛp¯ Decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of a J/ψΛ Resonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ψΛp¯ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 031901 (2023), arXiv:2210.10346 [hep-ex]

  6. [6]

    G.-J. Wang, R. Chen, L. Ma, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Magnetic moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states, Phys. Rev. D94, 094018 (2016), arXiv:1605.01337 [hep-ph]

  7. [7]

    Ortiz-Pacheco, R

    E. Ortiz-Pacheco, R. Bijker, and C. Fern´ andez-Ram´ ırez, Hidden charm pentaquarks: mass spectrum, magnetic moments, and photocouplings, J. Phys. G46, 065104 (2019), arXiv:1808.10512 [nucl-th]

  8. [8]

    Xu, Y.-L

    Y.-J. Xu, Y.-L. Liu, and M.-Q. Huang, The magnetic moment ofP c(4312) as a ¯DΣc molecular state, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 421 (2021), arXiv:2008.07937 [hep-ph]

  9. [9]

    ¨Ozdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states:P c(4440),P c(4457) andP cs(4459), Eur

    U. ¨Ozdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states:P c(4440),P c(4457) andP cs(4459), Eur. Phys. J. C81, 277 (2021), arXiv:2102.01996 [hep-ph]

  10. [10]

    Li, Z.-W

    M.-W. Li, Z.-W. Liu, Z.-F. Sun, and R. Chen, Magnetic moments and transition magnetic moments of Pc and Pcs states, Phys. Rev. D104, 054016 (2021), arXiv:2106.15053 [hep-ph]

  11. [11]

    ¨Ozdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys

    U. ¨Ozdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys. Lett. B846, 138267 (2023), arXiv:2303.10649 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    ¨Ozdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys

    U. ¨Ozdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys. Lett. B836, 137635 (2023), arXiv:2208.07684 [hep-ph]

  13. [13]

    Gao and H.-S

    F. Gao and H.-S. Li, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm strange pentaquark states*, Chin. Phys. C46, 123111 (2022), arXiv:2112.01823 [hep-ph]. 12

  14. [14]

    Guo and H.-S

    F. Guo and H.-S. Li, Analysis of the hidden-charm pentaquark states based on magnetic moment and transition magnetic moment, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 392 (2024), arXiv:2304.10981 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    Wang, S.-Q

    F.-L. Wang, S.-Q. Luo, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, and X. Liu, Exploring the electromagnetic properties of the Ξc(’,*)D¯s* and Ωc(*)D¯s* molecular states, Phys. Rev. D108, 034006 (2023), arXiv:2210.02809 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Wang, H.-Y

    F.-L. Wang, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, and X. Liu, What can we learn from the electromagnetic properties of hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks with single strangeness?, Phys. Rev. D106, 054020 (2022), arXiv:2208.10756 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    ¨Ozdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate ¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic properties, Eur

    U. ¨Ozdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate ¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic properties, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 769 (2024), arXiv:2401.12678 [hep-ph]

  18. [18]

    H.-S. Li, F. Guo, Y.-D. Lei, and F. Gao, Magnetic moments and axial charges of the octet hidden-charm molecular pentaquark family, Phys. Rev. D109, 094027 (2024), arXiv:2401.14767 [hep-ph]

  19. [19]

    Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys

    H.-S. Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D109, 114039 (2024), arXiv:2401.14759 [hep-ph]

  20. [20]

    ¨Ozdem, Probing the electromagnetic structure of theP c(4337)+ pentaquark: insights from a diquark–diquark–antiquark picture forJ P = 1 2 − and 3 2 − states, Eur

    U. ¨Ozdem, Probing the electromagnetic structure of theP c(4337)+ pentaquark: insights from a diquark–diquark–antiquark picture forJ P = 1 2 − and 3 2 − states, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 704 (2025), arXiv:2506.04345 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    ¨Ozdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin- 3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP02, 207, arXiv:2510.26893 [hep-ph]

    U. ¨Ozdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin- 3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP02, 207, arXiv:2510.26893 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pentaquark states, Eur

    H. Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pentaquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 874 (2024), arXiv:2403.16616 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    Mutuk and X.-W

    H. Mutuk and X.-W. Kang, Unveiling the structure of hidden-bottom strange pentaquarks via magnetic moments, Phys. Lett. B855, 138772 (2024), arXiv:2405.07066 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Wu, Y.-R

    J. Wu, Y.-R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Hidden-charm pentaquarks and their hidden-bottom andB c-like partner states, Phys. Rev. D95, 034002 (2017), arXiv:1701.03873 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    Lin, H.-X

    J.-X. Lin, H.-X. Chen, W.-H. Liang, W.-Y. Liu, and D. Zhou, Molecular pentaquark states with open charm and bottom flavors, Eur. Phys. J. A60, 15 (2024), arXiv:2308.01007 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    Wang and Z.-W

    Z.-Y. Wang and Z.-W. Long, Prediction of QQqqs¯molecular pentaquarks within the extended local hidden gauge ap- proach, Phys. Rev. D112, 056029 (2025), arXiv:2508.21474 [hep-ph]

  27. [27]

    Yang, Z.-F

    Z.-C. Yang, Z.-F. Sun, J. He, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The possible hidden-charm molecular baryons composed of anti- charmed meson and charmed baryon, Chin. Phys. C36, 6 (2012), arXiv:1105.2901 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    Jacob and G

    M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin, Annals Phys.7, 404 (1959)

  29. [29]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), First Determination of the Spin-Parity of Ξc(3055)+,0 Baryons, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), First Determination of the Spin-Parity of Ξc(3055)+,0 Baryons, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 081901 (2025), arXiv:2409.05440 [hep-ex]

  30. [30]

    Kang, H.-B

    X.-W. Kang, H.-B. Li, and B.-S. Zou, Partial wave analysis of psi’ —>gamma chi(c0) —>gamma p K- Lambda-bar being used for searching for baryon resonance, Chin. Phys. C34, 1061 (2010), arXiv:0911.2998 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    Kang, H.-B

    X.-W. Kang, H.-B. Li, G.-R. Lu, and A. Datta, Study of CP violation in Λ + c decay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A26, 2523 (2011), arXiv:1003.5494 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    Charles, S

    J. Charles, S. Descotes-Genon, X.-W. Kang, H.-B. Li, and G.-R. Lu, Extracting CP violation and strong phase in D decays by using quantum correlations in psi(3770) —>D0 D0-bar —>(V(1)V(2))(V(3)V(4)) and psi(3770) —>D0 D0-bar —-> (V(1)V(2))(K pi), Phys. Rev. D81, 054032 (2010), arXiv:0912.0899 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    B. Wang, B. Yang, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Radiative transitions and magnetic moments of the charmed and bottom vector mesons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D100, 016019 (2019), arXiv:1905.07742 [hep-ph]. 13 TABLE III. Magnetic moments of theb¯coctet molecular pentaquark family states. The results are listed in unit of nuclear magnetonµ N. State...