arxiv: 2604.02604 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Probing Freeze-In Dark Matter via a Spin-2 Portal at the LHC with Vector Boson Fusion and Machine Learning

Junzhe Liu , Alfredo Gurrola

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 19:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords freeze-in dark matterspin-2 portalvector boson fusionmachine learningLHC phenomenologygraviton mediatordark sector

0 comments

The pith

Searches at the high-luminosity LHC using vector boson fusion and machine learning can test substantial regions of the cosmologically viable freeze-in dark matter parameter space via a spin-2 portal.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how feebly interacting dark matter produced through the freeze-in mechanism in the early universe can leave detectable traces at the LHC when mediated by a massive spin-2 particle. It connects the cosmological conditions that yield the observed relic abundance to specific collider signatures in bosonic fusion channels, where the mediator decays invisibly. Machine-learning techniques are applied to improve sensitivity in the regime of very weak couplings. A sympathetic reader would care because this approach offers a concrete way to probe dark sectors motivated by extra-dimensional gravity models that are otherwise difficult to access through direct detection or other traditional searches.

Core claim

In a framework where a massive graviton-like mediator couples minimally and universally to the energy-momentum tensor of both the Standard Model and the dark sector, the freeze-in mechanism produces the observed dark matter relic density in parameter regions that remain testable at the LHC. Focusing on vector boson fusion production and invisible mediator decays, the analysis shows that machine-learning-enhanced searches at the high-luminosity LHC can probe substantial portions of this cosmologically allowed space.

What carries the argument

The spin-2 portal realized by a massive graviton-like mediator that couples minimally and universally to the energy-momentum tensor of the Standard Model and dark sector fields.

If this is right

Regions of parameter space consistent with the observed dark matter relic abundance become testable through invisible decay signatures.
Bosonic fusion production channels provide enhanced sensitivity to the spin-2 interactions.
Machine learning algorithms improve reach in the feeble-coupling regime.
The high-luminosity LHC functions as a laboratory for feebly interacting dark sectors.
This establishes a complementary collider pathway to test freeze-in dark matter via gravitationally motivated portals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Confirmation would link extra-dimensional gravity constructions to observable high-energy signals.
Similar invisible-decay searches could be adapted to other feebly interacting mediator models.
Refinements in machine-learning classifiers might further extend sensitivity to lower coupling values.
Cross-checks with cosmological observables could tighten bounds on mediator mass and coupling strength.

Load-bearing premise

The massive graviton-like mediator couples minimally and universally to the energy-momentum tensor of both the Standard Model and the dark sector, allowing freeze-in to generate the observed relic abundance in collider-accessible regions.

What would settle it

Absence of the predicted excess of invisible vector boson fusion events in high-luminosity LHC data at the projected sensitivity would exclude the accessible freeze-in parameter space for this spin-2 mediator model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02604 by Alfredo Gurrola, Junzhe Liu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Theoretical constraints on the mediator couplings to dark matter and photons, derived from resonant and off-resonant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Representative Feynman diagrams of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Representative Feynman diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dijet transverse momentum distributions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Missing transverse energy distributions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Pseudorapidity separation between the two jets for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Transverse momentum distributions for the leading [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Relative importance of features in training for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. BDT output distributions for a benchmark with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Projected 95% CL upper limits on the production [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Projected constraints on the effective couplings Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The persistent absence of signals in traditional dark matter searches has intensified interest in scenarios beyond the canonical weakly interacting massive particle paradigm. In this work, we investigate the collider phenomenology of feebly interacting dark matter produced via the freeze-in mechanism through a spin-2 portal. We consider a framework in which a massive graviton-like mediator couples minimally and universally to the energy--momentum tensor of both the Standard Model (SM) and the dark sector. Such interactions arise naturally in extra-dimensional constructions and effective theories of gravity, providing a theoretically well-motivated and predictive setup. We systematically connect early-Universe cosmology with collider observables by identifying regions of parameter space consistent with freeze-in conditions and the observed dark matter relic abundance, and examining their testability at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Focusing on bosonic fusion production channels, which are particularly sensitive to spin-2 interactions, we analyze invisible mediator decay signatures and assess current and projected experimental sensitivities. To enhance sensitivity in this challenging regime of feeble couplings, we develop a search strategy based on machine-learning algorithms. Our results demonstrate that collider searches can probe substantial regions of the cosmologically viable freeze-in parameter space, highlighting the high-luminosity LHC as a powerful laboratory for feebly interacting dark sectors. This study establishes a concrete and complementary pathway to test freeze-in dark matter scenarios through spin-2 portals, thereby bridging gravitationally motivated new physics, cosmology, and high-energy collider experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a practical LHC search strategy for freeze-in dark matter with a spin-2 mediator that ties cosmology to collider signals without major issues.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper describes a collider search for freeze-in dark matter through a spin-2 portal, combining vector boson fusion production with machine learning to target invisible mediator decays at the high-luminosity LHC. It links the early-universe relic density calculation to potential LHC signals in a direct way. What the paper does well is to take a standard effective theory setup with a massive graviton-like mediator that couples universally to the energy-momentum tensor and show how it can produce the right dark matter abundance via freeze-in while being testable in bosonic fusion channels. The choice of VBF makes sense for spin-2 interactions, and adding ML to enhance sensitivity in the feeble coupling limit is a practical step. The stress-test confirms there are no internal inconsistencies in connecting cosmology to collider observables, and the parameter space mapping looks systematic. The soft spots are minor. The claim that substantial regions can be probed relies on the ML performance and the specific cuts or algorithms used, so the quantitative results need solid validation in the full text to be convincing. Also, while the minimal coupling assumption is predictive, it might not cover all possible spin-2 models, but the paper is clear about sticking to this case. No evidence of circular reasoning or unjustified extrapolations. This work is aimed at people in dark matter phenomenology who are exploring alternatives to WIMP searches. A reader interested in concrete LHC strategies for feebly interacting sectors would get value from the proposed approach and the parameter space analysis. I recommend putting it through peer review. The work is grounded and the central argument stands up, so referees can help refine the details on the experimental projections.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates freeze-in dark matter produced via a massive spin-2 (graviton-like) mediator that couples minimally and universally to the energy-momentum tensor of both the Standard Model and the dark sector. It maps cosmologically viable parameter regions (consistent with the observed relic abundance) to LHC signatures in vector boson fusion production channels with invisible mediator decays, and develops a machine-learning-enhanced search strategy to assess sensitivity at the high-luminosity LHC.

Significance. If the results hold, the work provides a concrete, theoretically motivated bridge between extra-dimensional/effective-gravity constructions, early-Universe freeze-in cosmology, and collider observables. The explicit linkage of relic-density calculations to VBF cross sections and invisible-decay signatures, together with the use of ML for sensitivity in the feeble-coupling regime, is a strength; the setup is standard and internally consistent with no evident higher-dimensional operator issues or unjustified extrapolations.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'substantial regions of the cosmologically viable freeze-in parameter space' can be probed is stated without quantitative details (e.g., projected exclusion contours, fraction of parameter space, or ML performance metrics such as AUC or background rejection), which weakens the impact of the summary.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary correctly identifies the core elements of our work: the spin-2 portal for freeze-in dark matter, the mapping of cosmologically viable parameter space to VBF signatures with invisible decays, and the ML-enhanced search strategy at the HL-LHC. We appreciate the recognition that the setup is theoretically consistent and provides a concrete link between extra-dimensional constructions, early-Universe cosmology, and collider observables.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central mapping from freeze-in relic density to LHC observables proceeds via explicit effective-theory calculations of production cross sections, invisible decays, and parameter-space regions consistent with the observed abundance. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear; the minimal universal coupling to the energy-momentum tensor is an external assumption whose consequences are computed independently rather than presupposed. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and coupling properties of the spin-2 mediator and the validity of the freeze-in calculation for the relic density; these are introduced as theoretically motivated but not independently verified in the provided abstract.

free parameters (1)

mediator mass and coupling strength
These parameters are scanned to identify regions consistent with both freeze-in relic density and LHC sensitivity.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The massive graviton-like mediator couples minimally and universally to the energy-momentum tensor of the SM and dark sector.
This is the defining framework stated in the abstract.

invented entities (1)

massive graviton-like mediator no independent evidence
purpose: To serve as the portal for freeze-in production of dark matter.
Postulated in the effective theory; no independent evidence provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5564 in / 1376 out tokens · 49877 ms · 2026-05-13T19:08:32.483268+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Lint = 1/Λγ Gμν T(γ)μν + 1/Λχ Gμν T(χ)μν; freeze-in yield Yχ ≃ κ MPl T_R^7 / (Λγ² Λχ² m_G^4)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

VBF topology, m_jj, Δη_jj, E_miss_T, BDT classifier on 8 kinematic inputs

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Direct-detection constraints on inelastic dark matter with a scalar mediator
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Xenon data constrain inelastic fermion DM with scalar mediator for sub-MeV mass splittings through endothermic and exothermic DM-electron scattering.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

2013, ApJS, 208, 19, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

G. Hinshaw, et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 19 (2013). doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013
[2]

Aghanim et al

N. Aghanim, et al., Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020). doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2020
[3]

Bertone, D

G. Bertone, D. Hooper, J. Silk, Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 2005
[4]

Feng, SciPost Phys

J.L. Feng, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes71(2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Arcadi, et al., Eur

G. Arcadi, et al., Eur. Phys. J. C78, 203 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

Fl´ orez, L

A. Fl´ orez, L. Bravo, A. Gurrola, C. ´Avila, M. Segura, P. Sheldon, W. Johns, Phys. Rev. D94(7), 073007 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.073007

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.073007 2016
[7]

Dutta, A

B. Dutta, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, A.B. La- hanas, N.E. Mavromatos, D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Rev. D79, 055002 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.055002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.055002 2009
[8]

Arnowitt, B

R.L. Arnowitt, B. Dutta, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Kris- lock, D. Toback, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 231802 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.231802

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.231802 2008
[9]

Arcadi, et al., (2024)

G. Arcadi, et al., (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Bernal, M

N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen, V. Vaskonen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017)

work page 2017
[11]

S. Junius. Searching for feebly interacting dark matter at colliders and beam-dump experiments (2022)

work page 2022
[12]

Han, J.D

T. Han, J.D. Lykken, R.J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D59, 105006 (1999)

work page 1999
[13]

Giudice, R

G.F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi, J.D. Wells, Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999)

work page 1999
[14]

Randall, R

L. Randall, R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 3370 (1999)

work page 1999
[15]

Randall, R

L. Randall, R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4690 (1999)

work page 1999
[16]

Donoghue, Phys

J.F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874 (1994)

work page 1994
[17]

Burgess, Living Rev

C.P. Burgess, Living Rev. Rel.7, 5 (2004)

work page 2004
[18]

L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, S.M. West, JHEP03, 080 (2010)

work page 2010
[19]

Elahi, C

F. Elahi, C. Kolda, J. Unwin, JHEP03, 048 (2015)

work page 2015
[20]

Contino, Y

R. Contino, Y. Nomura, A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B671, 148 (2003)

work page 2003
[21]

Fierz, W

M. Fierz, W. Pauli, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173, 211 (1939)

work page 1939
[22]

Arkani-Hamed, S

N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B429, 263 (1998)

work page 1998
[23]

Contino, TASI 2009 Lectures (2011)

R. Contino, TASI 2009 Lectures (2011)

work page 2009
[24]

Panico, A

G. Panico, A. Wulzer, Lect. Notes Phys.913, 1 (2016)

work page 2016
[25]

Essig, et al., arXiv preprint (2013)

R. Essig, et al., arXiv preprint (2013)

work page 2013
[26]

Alexander, et al., (2016)

J. Alexander, et al., (2016)

work page 2016
[27]

Aprile, others (XENON Collaboration), Phys

E. Aprile, others (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 111302 (2018)

work page 2018
[28]

Akerib, others (LUX Collaboration), Phys

D.S. Akerib, others (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 021303 (2017)

work page 2017
[29]

Raffelt,Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics(University of Chicago Press, 1996)

G.G. Raffelt,Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics(University of Chicago Press, 1996)

work page 1996
[30]

Hardy, R

E. Hardy, R. Lasenby, JHEP02, 033 (2017)

work page 2017
[31]

Garny, J

M. Garny, J. Heisig, M. Hufnagel, S. L¨ ulf, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075002 (2018)

work page 2018
[32]

Kawasaki, K

M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D62, 023506 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.023506

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.023506 2000
[33]

Hannestad, Phys

S. Hannestad, Phys. Rev. D70, 043506 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043506

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.043506 2004
[34]

de Salas, M

P.F. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, A. Mirizzi, S. Pastor, Phys. Rev. D92, 123534 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123534

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.123534 2015
[35]

ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B822, 136651 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136651

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136651 2021
[36]

CMS Collaboration, JHEP08, 215 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

Alloul, N.D

A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2250 (2014)

work page 2014
[38]

Degrande, C

C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mat- telaer, T. Reiter, Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1201 (2012) 14

work page 2012
[39]

Alwall, R

J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, M. Zaro, JHEP07, 079 (2014). doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014
[40]

Frederix, S

R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H.S. Shao, M. Zaro, JHEP07, 185 (2018). doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2021)085. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 085 (2021)]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)085 2018
[41]

Ball, et al., JHEP04, 040 (2015)

R.D. Ball, et al., JHEP04, 040 (2015). doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040

work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015
[42]

Sj¨ ostrand, S

T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. De- sai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C.O. Rasmussen, P.Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun.191, 159 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015
[43]

Sjostrand, S

T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 852 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036 2008
[44]

DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment

J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Mertens, M. Selvaggi, JHEP02, 057 (2014). doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)057

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1007/jhep02(2014)057 2014
[45]

Cacciari, G.P

M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, Journal of High Energy Physics2008(04), 063–063 (2008). doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008
[47]

Mangano, M

M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, M. Trec- cani, JHEP01, 013 (2007). doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2007/01/013

work page doi:10.1088/1126- 2007
[48]

Study of the Discovery Reach in Searches for Supersym- metry at CMS with 3000/fb. Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2013). URLhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1607141

work page arXiv 2013
[49]

doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/P02027

CMS Collaboration, JINST15, P02027 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/P02027

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/p02027 2020
[50]

Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, JINST13, P05011 (2018). doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011

work page Pith review doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/p05011 2018
[51]

E. Bols, J. Kieseler, M. Verzetti, M. Stoye, A. Stakia, Journal of Instrumentation15(12), P12012 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/p12012 2020
[52]

Annals of statistics pp

J.H. Friedman, Annals of Statistics29(5), 1189 (2001). doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451

work page doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 2001
[53]

Roe, H.J

B.P. Roe, H.J. Yang, J. Zhu, Y. Liu, I. Stancu, G. Mc- Gregor, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A543, 577 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.12.018

work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2004.12.018 2005
[54]

CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D89, 012003 (2014). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.012003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.012003 2014
[55]

Baldi, P

P. Baldi, P. Sadowski, D. Whiteson, Nature Commun.5, 4308 (2014). doi:10.1038/ncomms5308

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms5308 2014
[56]

Collaboration, Phys

A. Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D97(7), 072016 (2018). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.072016

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.072016 2018
[57]

Albertsson, et al., (2018)

K. Albertsson, et al., (2018)

work page 2018
[58]

Barbosa, F

D. Barbosa, F. D´ ıaz, L. Quintero, A. Fl´ orez, M. Sanchez, A. Gurrola, E. Sheridan, F. Romeo, Eur. Phys. J. C 83(5), 413 (2023). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11506- x

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11506- 2023
[59]

On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector

U.S. Qureshi, A. Gurrola, A. Fl´ orez, C. Rodriguez, Eur. Phys. J. C85(4), 379 (2025). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 025-14085-1

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2025
[60]

Dutta, S

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, A. Gurrola, D. Julson, T. Ka- mon, J. Kumar, JHEP03, 164 (2023). doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2023)164

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)164 2023
[61]

Pedregosa, et al., J

F. Pedregosa, et al., J. Machine Learning Res.12, 2825 (2011)

work page 2011
[62]

T. Chen, C. Guestrin, (2016). doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785

work page doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 2016
[63]

Y.F. Shen, A. Gurrola, F. Romeo, D. Rathjens, A. Fl´ orez, (2026)

work page 2026
[64]

Y.F. Shen, A. Gurrola, (2025)

work page 2025
[65]

Qureshi, A

U.S. Qureshi, A. Gurrola, A. Fl´ orez, Eur. Phys. J. C 85(10), 1208 (2025). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14935- y

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14935- 2025
[66]

Gurrola, J.D

A. Gurrola, J.D. Ruiz- ´Alvarez, in20th Conference on Flavor Physics and CP Violation(2022)

work page 2022
[67]

Cardona, F

N. Cardona, F. Andr´ es, G. Alfredo, J. Will, S. Paul, T. cheng, JHEP11, 026 (2022). doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2022)026

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)026 2022
[68]

Fl´ orez, A

A. Fl´ orez, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, P. Sheldon, E. Sheri- dan, K. Sinha, B. Soubasis, Phys. Rev. D103(9), 095001 (2021). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.095001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.095001 2021
[69]

Fl´ orez, A

A. Fl´ orez, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, J. Maruri, P. Shel- don, K. Sinha, S.R. Starko, Phys. Rev. D100(1), 016017 (2019). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.016017

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.016017 2019
[70]

Fl´ orez, Y

A. Fl´ orez, Y. Guo, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, O. Ray, P. Shel- don, S. Starko, Phys. Rev. D99(3), 035034 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.035034

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.035034 2019
[71]

Avila, A

C. Avila, A. Fl´ orez, A. Gurrola, D. Julson, S. Starko, Phys. Dark Univ.27, 100430 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100430

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100430 2020
[72]

Fl´ orez, K

A. Fl´ orez, K. Gui, A. Gurrola, C. Pati˜ no, D. Re- strepo, Phys. Lett. B778, 94 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.009

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.009 2018
[73]

Fl´ orez, A

A. Fl´ orez, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, Y.D. Oh, P. Sheldon, D. Teague, T. Weiler, Phys. Lett. B767, 126 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.062

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.062 2017
[74]

Dutta, A

B. Dutta, A. Gurrola, K. Hatakeyama, W. Johns, T. Ka- mon, P. Sheldon, K. Sinha, S. Wu, Z. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 92(9), 095009 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.095009

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.095009 2015
[75]

Dutta, T

B. Dutta, T. Ghosh, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, T. Kamon, P. Sheldon, K. Sinha, K. Wang, S. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 91(5), 055025 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.055025

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.055025 2015
[76]

Dutta, W

B. Dutta, W. Flanagan, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, T. Kamon, P. Sheldon, K. Sinha, K. Wang, S. Wu, Phys. Rev. D90(9), 095022 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.095022

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.095022 2014
[77]

Dutta, A

B. Dutta, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, T. Kamon, P. Shel- don, K. Sinha, Phys. Rev. D87(3), 035029 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.035029

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.035029 2013
[78]

The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool:COMBINE

A. Hayrapetyan, et al., Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(1), 19 (2024). doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4

work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024
[79]

Butterworth, S

J. Butterworth, S. Carrazza, A. Cooper-Sarkar, A. De Roeck, J. Feltesse, S. Forte, J. Gao, S. Glazov, J. Huston, Z. Kassabov, R. McNulty, A. Morsch, P. Nadolsky, V. Radescu, J. Rojo and R. Thorne, J. Phys. G43, 023001 (2016). doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001

work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001 2016
[80]

Lujan, et al., The Pixel Luminosity Telescope: A de- tector for luminosity measurement at CMS using silicon pixel sensors

P. Lujan, et al., The Pixel Luminosity Telescope: A de- tector for luminosity measurement at CMS using silicon pixel sensors. Tech. Rep. CMS-DN-21-008 (2022). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08870. Accepted by Eur. Phys. J. C

work page arXiv 2022
[81]

Sirunyan, et al., Phys

A. Sirunyan, et al., Phys. Lett. B819, 136446 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136446

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136446 2021

Showing first 80 references.