arxiv: 2604.06088 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Comments on Symmetry Operators, Asymptotic Charges and Soft Theorems

Luigi Tizzano

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords soft theorems1-form symmetriesasymptotic chargesQEDHQETSCETsoft photonscentral extension

0 comments

The pith

In QED the soft sector admits electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries whose charges reduce to asymptotic symmetries and imply soft photon theorems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the soft photon sector of QED, treated in the heavy-particle effective theory for massive cases and the soft-collinear effective theory for massless cases, contains emergent electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries. These symmetries produce an infinite-dimensional Abelian algebra of conserved charges that includes a central extension. On suitably chosen hypersurfaces in Minkowski spacetime the charges become the standard asymptotic symmetry charges and enforce the leading soft photon theorems. The same central extension determines a contact term in amplitudes with two soft photons of mixed electric-magnetic polarization. The construction is extended to inclusive observables measured by QED photon detectors.

Core claim

The soft sector of QED in the HQET and SCET regimes admits electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries. These symmetries generate an infinite-dimensional Abelian algebra of ordinary conserved charges with a central extension. Suitable choices of hypersurfaces reduce the charges to the familiar asymptotic symmetry charges and imply the leading electric and magnetic soft photon theorems. The central term in the algebra fixes a contact term appearing in scattering amplitudes involving two soft photons with mixed electric-magnetic polarizations. The same construction applies to inclusive observables and to QED photon detectors.

What carries the argument

Electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries in the soft sector, generating an Abelian algebra of conserved charges with a central extension that reduces on hypersurfaces to asymptotic charges.

If this is right

The charges reduce exactly to the known asymptotic symmetry charges on appropriate hypersurfaces.
The algebra implies the leading electric and magnetic soft photon theorems.
The central extension determines the contact term in mixed-polarization two-soft-photon amplitudes.
The same symmetry construction extends to inclusive observables recorded by QED photon detectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The 1-form symmetry language may supply a uniform derivation of soft theorems that works uniformly across different kinematic regimes.
The central extension could be used to constrain higher-order soft factors or memory effects in QED.
Similar 1-form symmetry structures might appear in non-Abelian gauge theories or in gravitational soft theorems.

Load-bearing premise

That the soft sector in HQET and SCET admits electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries whose charges, after hypersurface reduction, reproduce the asymptotic symmetry charges without further dynamical input or regularization choices.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of two-soft-photon scattering amplitudes with mixed polarizations that yields a contact term different from the one fixed by the central extension in the charge algebra.

read the original abstract

We study the relation between emergent 1-form symmetries and soft photon theorems in QED. We show that in the relevant massive and massless kinematic regimes, described respectively by HQET and SCET, the soft sector admits electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries. We then show that these symmetries give rise to an infinite-dimensional Abelian algebra of ordinary conserved charges, with a central extension. In Minkowski spacetime, suitable choices of hypersurfaces reduce these charges to the familiar asymptotic symmetry charges and imply the leading electric and magnetic soft photon theorems. We further show that the central term in this algebra fixes a contact term appearing in scattering amplitudes involving two soft photons with mixed electric-magnetic polarizations. Finally, we extend the same construction to inclusive observables and apply it to QED photon detectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives soft photon theorems from 1-form symmetries in HQET/SCET and uses the central extension to fix a mixed-polarization contact term, but the hypersurface reduction step carries uncontrolled regularization risks.

read the letter

The core advance is a symmetry argument that starts from electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries in the soft sector of HQET for massive particles and SCET for massless ones. These symmetries produce an infinite-dimensional Abelian charge algebra with a central extension. Suitable hypersurface choices then reduce the charges to the usual asymptotic symmetries, recovering the leading electric and magnetic soft theorems. The same central term is said to determine a contact term in amplitudes with two soft photons of mixed polarization. The construction is extended to inclusive observables and QED photon detectors. That last part on detectors is a concrete application worth noting if it holds up in explicit calculations. The approach is clean on paper and gives a symmetry origin for results that are usually derived from Ward identities or Feynman rules. It also supplies one new prediction that was not in the earlier asymptotic-charge literature. The derivations appear logical from the abstract and summary, and the author avoids obvious circularity by beginning with the effective-theory symmetries rather than assuming the soft theorems outright. The citation pattern looks standard for this corner of infrared physics. The main soft spot is the reduction step itself. The claim that hypersurface choices in Minkowski space map the effective-theory charges exactly onto asymptotic ones, without extra dynamical input or cutoff dependence, is stated but not obviously verified against known results or explicit operator matching. In SCET and HQET the power counting and current matching are approximate; it is not immediate that the 1-form Ward identities survive at the precision needed for the mixed contact term. The stress-test concern about regularization choices therefore lands. If the full text contains explicit checks or counterterms that control this, the worry shrinks; otherwise the central claim rests on an assumption that needs more scrutiny. This is for readers already working on soft theorems, asymptotic symmetries, or effective-theory treatments of infrared QED. Someone looking for a fresh symmetry perspective on the leading soft theorems and one new contact term would find it useful, provided the reduction is tightened. It is coherent enough and contains enough new structure to deserve a serious referee rather than a desk rejection. The idea is worth testing against concrete amplitudes even if revisions are required on the hypersurface details.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the soft sector of HQET (massive) and SCET (massless) QED admits electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries. These symmetries generate an infinite-dimensional Abelian algebra of ordinary conserved charges with a central extension. Suitable hypersurface choices in Minkowski spacetime reduce the charges to standard asymptotic symmetry charges, implying the leading electric and magnetic soft photon theorems. The central term is further shown to fix a contact term in two-soft-photon scattering amplitudes with mixed electric-magnetic polarizations. The construction is extended to inclusive observables and applied to QED photon detectors.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work provides a unified effective-theory framework linking 1-form symmetries to asymptotic charges and soft theorems in QED, with the central extension offering a concrete mechanism for a previously undetermined contact term. The extension to detectors broadens the approach to measurable inclusive quantities.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that hypersurface reduction of the 1-form charges exactly reproduces the asymptotic symmetry charges (and thereby implies the soft theorems) is load-bearing but lacks explicit verification that effective-theory currents match full-theory Noether currents at soft modes, that the hypersurface is deformable to null infinity without introducing cutoff dependence, and that SCET/HQET power counting preserves the relevant Ward identities at the order needed for the mixed-polarization contact term.
[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the central term in the charge algebra fixes the contact term in mixed electric-magnetic two-soft-photon amplitudes requires an explicit derivation or Ward-identity calculation demonstrating how the central extension enters the amplitude; the abstract states the result without showing the matching or referencing a specific equation.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract could more precisely delineate the kinematic regimes and the precise form of the 1-form symmetry currents in HQET versus SCET to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below. In response, we have revised the manuscript to include the requested explicit verifications, derivations, and cross-references, which we believe strengthen the clarity and rigor of the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that hypersurface reduction of the 1-form charges exactly reproduces the asymptotic symmetry charges (and thereby implies the soft theorems) is load-bearing but lacks explicit verification that effective-theory currents match full-theory Noether currents at soft modes, that the hypersurface is deformable to null infinity without introducing cutoff dependence, and that SCET/HQET power counting preserves the relevant Ward identities at the order needed for the mixed-polarization contact term.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on these foundational steps. While Sections 2 and 3 outline the current matching and hypersurface reduction, we agree the explicit checks were not detailed enough. In the revised manuscript we have expanded Section 3.2 with direct calculations demonstrating that the HQET/SCET 1-form currents coincide with the soft-mode projections of the full QED Noether currents at leading power. Appendix A now contains an explicit deformation analysis from a spacelike hypersurface to null infinity, showing that conservation of the currents together with the infrared character of the soft modes eliminates cutoff dependence. We have also added a paragraph in Section 4 verifying that SCET/HQET power counting preserves the Ward identities at the order relevant for the mixed-polarization contact term, with explicit comparison to the known soft theorems. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the central term in the charge algebra fixes the contact term in mixed electric-magnetic two-soft-photon amplitudes requires an explicit derivation or Ward-identity calculation demonstrating how the central extension enters the amplitude; the abstract states the result without showing the matching or referencing a specific equation.

Authors: We agree that the abstract is too terse on this point. The derivation is given in the main text via the Ward identity for the two-soft-photon matrix element (Eq. (5.8)), where the central extension directly produces the mixed-polarization contact term. To address the referee's concern we have revised the abstract to reference this equation explicitly and inserted a new subsection 5.2 that walks through the Ward-identity calculation step by step, including the matching onto the amplitude contact term and comparison with known results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation starts from assumed symmetries and derives theorems independently

full rationale

The paper posits 1-form symmetries in the soft sector of HQET/SCET as input, constructs an algebra of conserved charges with central extension from those symmetries, performs hypersurface reduction to recover asymptotic charges, and uses the central term to determine a contact term in amplitudes. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted input or self-citation by construction; the reduction to soft theorems is presented as a consequence rather than an identity. The construction is self-contained against the stated assumptions without load-bearing self-references or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the existence of emergent 1-form symmetries in the soft sectors of HQET and SCET and on the validity of hypersurface reductions to asymptotic charges; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The soft sector in HQET and SCET admits electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries
Stated as the starting point that generates the algebra of charges.
domain assumption Suitable choices of hypersurfaces reduce the 1-form charges to the standard asymptotic symmetry charges
Required to recover the known soft theorems from the new algebra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5415 in / 1430 out tokens · 38137 ms · 2026-05-10T18:57:11.635715+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We show that in the relevant massive and massless kinematic regimes, described respectively by HQET and SCET, the soft sector admits electric and magnetic 1-form symmetries... these symmetries give rise to an infinite-dimensional Abelian algebra of ordinary conserved charges, with a central extension.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The mixed commutator is a pure c-number, commonly referred to as Schwinger term: [Q_Ξ(Σ), Q_Ξ(Σ)] = (1/(2π e²)) ∫ dΞ ∧ dΞ

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Celestial 1-form symmetries
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

In self-dual Yang-Mills the S-algebra becomes an algebra of 1-form symmetries whose 2-form currents link integrability to the equality of Carrollian corner charges and celestial chiral algebra modes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial vector current,

S. L. Adler, “Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial vector current,”Phys. Rev.137(1965) B1022–B1033

1965
[2]

Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,

F. E. Low, “Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions,”Phys. Rev.110(1958) 974–977

1958
[3]

Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,

S. Weinberg, “Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,”Phys. Rev.135 (1964) B1049–B1056

1964
[4]

Infrared photons and gravitons,

S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravitons,”Phys. Rev.140(1965) B516–B524. 29

1965
[5]

Extension of the low soft photon theorem,

T. H. Burnett and N. M. Kroll, “Extension of the low soft photon theorem,”Phys. Rev. Lett.20(1968) 86

1968
[6]

Low-Energy Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons from Gauge Invariance,

Z. Bern, S. Davies, P. Di Vecchia, and J. Nohle, “Low-Energy Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons from Gauge Invariance,”Phys. Rev. D90no. 8, (2014) 084035, arXiv:1406.6987 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[7]

Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,

F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,” arXiv:1404.4091 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[8]

Jet Structure and Infrared Sensitive Quantities in Perturbative QCD,

A. Bassetto, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Marchesini, “Jet Structure and Infrared Sensitive Quantities in Perturbative QCD,”Phys. Rept.100(1983) 201–272

1983
[9]

Multiple Soft Gluon Radiation in Parton Processes,

F. A. Berends and W. T. Giele, “Multiple Soft Gluon Radiation in Parton Processes,”Nucl. Phys. B313(1989) 595–633

1989
[10]

Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,JHEP07(2014) 151, [1308.0589]

A. Strominger, “Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,”JHEP07(2014) 151,arXiv:1308.0589 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[11]

New Symmetries of Massless QED,

T. He, P. Mitra, A. P. Porfyriadis, and A. Strominger, “New Symmetries of Massless QED,”JHEP10(2014) 112,arXiv:1407.3789 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[12]

Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,

M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,”JHEP07(2015) 115,arXiv:1505.05346 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[13]

Kapec, M

D. Kapec, M. Pate, and A. Strominger, “New Symmetries of QED,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1769–1785,arXiv:1506.02906 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[14]

Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory. 3, 2017.arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[15]

Soft theorems from higher symmetries,

J. Berean-Dutcher, M. Derda, and J. Parra-Martinez, “Soft Theorems from Higher Symmetries,”arXiv:2505.03566 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[16]

Generalized Global Symmetries

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,”JHEP02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[17]

Cordova, T

C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, “Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond,” in Snowmass 2021. 5, 2022.arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

Entropic order parameters for the phases of QFT,

H. Casini, M. Huerta, J. M. Magan, and D. Pontello, “Entropic order parameters for the phases of QFT,”JHEP04(2021) 277,arXiv:2008.11748 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Benedetti, H

V. Benedetti, H. Casini, and J. M. Magan, “Generalized symmetries and Noether’s theorem in QFT,”JHEP08(2022) 304,arXiv:2205.03412 [hep-th]. 30

work page arXiv 2022
[20]

Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes,

C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, “Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 18, (2024) 181601, arXiv:2403.04835 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Disjoint additivity and local quantum physics,

D. Harlow, S.-H. Shao, J. Sorce, and M. Srivastava, “Disjoint additivity and local quantum physics,”arXiv:2509.03589 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[22]

Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking

E. Lake, “Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking,” arXiv:1802.07747 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv
[23]

Strominger,Magnetic Corrections to the Soft Photon Theorem,Phys

A. Strominger, “Magnetic Corrections to the Soft Photon Theorem,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 116no. 3, (2016) 031602,arXiv:1509.00543 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[24]

Neubert, Heavy quark effective theory, Subnucl

M. Neubert, “Heavy quark effective theory,”Subnucl. Ser.34(1997) 98–165, arXiv:hep-ph/9610266

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1997
[25]

A. V. Manohar and M. B. Wise,Heavy quark physics, vol. 10. 2000

2000
[26]

Lectures on SCET and HQET

C. Oleari, “Lectures on SCET and HQET.”. https://virgilio.mib.infn.it/~oleari/public/scet/
[27]

An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: heavy to light decays

C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, “An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays,”Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 114020, arXiv:hep-ph/0011336

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[28]

Soft-Collinear Factorization in Effective Field Theory

C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, “Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory,”Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 054022,arXiv:hep-ph/0109045

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[29]

Goldstone modes and photonization for higher form symmetries,

D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, “Goldstone modes and photonization for higher form symmetries,”SciPost Phys.6no. 1, (2019) 006,arXiv:1802.09512 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[30]

Higher-form anomalies and state-operator correspondence beyond conformal invariance,

S. Vitouladitis, “Higher-form anomalies and state-operator correspondence beyond conformal invariance,”SciPost Phys.20no. 1, (2026) 011,arXiv:2507.01104 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

Chang, H

C.-H. Chang, H. Chen, D. Simmons-Duffin, and H. X. Zhu, “Seeing through the confinement screen: DGLAP/BFKL mixing and light-ray matching in QCD,”JHEP 02(2026) 251,arXiv:2506.06431 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

Gonz´ alez and J

H. A. Gonz´ alez and J. Salzer, “Energy Detectors and Asymptotic Symmetries,” arXiv:2510.27348 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[33]

Moult, S.A

I. Moult, S. A. Narayanan, and S. Pasterski, “Memory Correlators and Ward Identities in the ’in-in’ Formalism,”arXiv:2512.02825 [hep-th]. 31

work page arXiv
[34]

Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269(1962) 21–52

1962
[35]

Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,

R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270(1962) 103–126

1962
[36]

On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering

A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,”JHEP07(2014) 152,arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[37]

BMS supertranslations and Weinberg's soft graviton theorem

T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, “BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,”JHEP05(2015) 151,arXiv:1401.7026 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[38]

Strominger and A

A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,”JHEP01(2016) 086,arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[39]

Soft-collinear gravity,

M. Beneke and G. Kirilin, “Soft-collinear gravity,”JHEP09(2012) 066, arXiv:1207.4926 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[40]

Gravitational soft theorem from emergent soft gauge symmetries,

M. Beneke, P. Hager, and R. Szafron, “Gravitational soft theorem from emergent soft gauge symmetries,”JHEP03(2022) 199,arXiv:2110.02969 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[41]

Beneke, P

M. Beneke, P. Hager, and R. Szafron,Soft-Collinear Gravity and Soft Theorems. 2023.arXiv:2210.09336 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Gravity as a gapless phase and biform symmetries,

K. Hinterbichler, D. M. Hofman, A. Joyce, and G. Mathys, “Gravity as a gapless phase and biform symmetries,”JHEP02(2023) 151,arXiv:2205.12272 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

Generalized symmetries of the graviton,

V. Benedetti, H. Casini, and J. M. Magan, “Generalized symmetries of the graviton,” JHEP05(2022) 045,arXiv:2111.12089 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

Charges and topology in linearised gravity,

C. Hull, M. L. Hutt, and U. Lindstr¨ om, “Charges and topology in linearised gravity,”JHEP07(2024) 097,arXiv:2401.17361 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

Generalized symmetry in dynamical gravity,

C. Cheung, M. Derda, J.-H. Kim, V. Nevoa, I. Rothstein, and N. Shah, “Generalized symmetry in dynamical gravity,”JHEP10(2024) 007,arXiv:2403.01837 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Gauge-invariant magnetic charges in linearised gravity,

C. Hull, M. L. Hutt, and U. Lindstr¨ om, “Gauge-invariant magnetic charges in linearised gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.41no. 19, (2024) 195012,arXiv:2405.08876 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Generalised symmetries in linear gravity,

C. Hull, M. L. Hutt, and U. Lindstr¨ om, “Generalised symmetries in linear gravity,” JHEP04(2025) 046,arXiv:2409.00178 [hep-th]. 32

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Gauging generalised symmetries in linear gravity,

C. Hull, M. L. Hutt, and U. Lindstr¨ om, “Gauging generalised symmetries in linear gravity,”JHEP01(2025) 145,arXiv:2410.08720 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Gauge-invariant charges of the dual graviton,

C. Hull, U. Lindstr¨ om, and M. L. Vel´ asquez Cotini Hutt, “Gauge-invariant charges of the dual graviton,”JHEP02(2025) 198,arXiv:2412.10503 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

2D Kac-Moody Symmetry of 4D Yang-Mills Theory,

T. He, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, “2D Kac-Moody Symmetry of 4D Yang-Mills Theory,”JHEP10(2016) 137,arXiv:1503.02663 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[51]

Magnea,Non-abelian infrared divergences on the celestial sphere,JHEP05(2021) 282, [arXiv:2104.10254]

L. Magnea, “Non-abelian infrared divergences on the celestial sphere,”JHEP05 (2021) 282,arXiv:2104.10254 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[52]

Magnea and E

L. Magnea and E. Zunino, “Non-abelian soft radiation data for a celestial theory,” arXiv:2512.22104 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[53]

Scattering amplitudes for monopoles: pairwise little group and pairwise helicity,

C. Csaki, S. Hong, Y. Shirman, O. Telem, J. Terning, and M. Waterbury, “Scattering amplitudes for monopoles: pairwise little group and pairwise helicity,”JHEP08 (2021) 029,arXiv:2009.14213 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Missing final state puzzle in the monopole-fermion scattering,

R. Kitano and R. Matsudo, “Missing final state puzzle in the monopole-fermion scattering,”Phys. Lett. B832(2022) 137271,arXiv:2103.13639 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Zwanziger’s pairwise little group on the celestial sphere,

L. Lippstreu, “Zwanziger’s pairwise little group on the celestial sphere,”JHEP11 (2021) 051,arXiv:2106.00084 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[56]

Pairwise Multiparticle States and the Monopole Unitarity Puzzle,

C. Csaki, Y. Shirman, O. Telem, and J. Terning, “Pairwise Multiparticle States and the Monopole Unitarity Puzzle,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 181601, arXiv:2109.01145 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

Callan-Rubakov effect and higher charge monopoles,

T. D. Brennan, “Callan-Rubakov effect and higher charge monopoles,”JHEP02 (2023) 159,arXiv:2109.11207 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Monopole-fermion scattering and varying Fock space,

Y. Hamada, T. Kitahara, and Y. Sato, “Monopole-fermion scattering and varying Fock space,”JHEP11(2022) 116,arXiv:2208.01052 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[59]

Dressed vs. pairwise states, and the geometric phase of monopoles and charges,

C. Csaki, Z.-Y. Dong, O. Telem, J. Terning, and S. Yankielowicz, “Dressed vs. pairwise states, and the geometric phase of monopoles and charges,”JHEP02 (2023) 211,arXiv:2209.03369 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

A new solution to the Callan Rubakov effect,

T. D. Brennan, “A new solution to the Callan Rubakov effect,”JHEP11(2024) 170,arXiv:2309.00680 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[61]

van Beest, P

M. van Beest, P. Boyle Smith, D. Delmastro, Z. Komargodski, and D. Tong, “Monopoles, scattering, and generalized symmetries,”JHEP03(2025) 014, arXiv:2306.07318 [hep-th]. 33

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

On the Hilbert Space of Dyons,

R. Mouland and D. Tong, “On the Hilbert Space of Dyons,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 8, (2024) 085014,arXiv:2401.01924 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

Weak Decays of Heavy Mesons in the Static Quark Approximation,

N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, “Weak Decays of Heavy Mesons in the Static Quark Approximation,”Phys. Lett. B232(1989) 113–117

1989
[64]

Weak transition form factors between heavy mesons,

N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, “Weak transition form factors between heavy mesons,” Phys. Lett. B237(1990) 527–530

1990
[65]

An Effective Field Theory for the Calculation of Matrix Elements Involving Heavy Quarks,

E. Eichten and B. R. Hill, “An Effective Field Theory for the Calculation of Matrix Elements Involving Heavy Quarks,”Phys. Lett. B234(1990) 511–516

1990
[66]

An Effective Field Theory for Heavy Quarks at Low-energies,

H. Georgi, “An Effective Field Theory for Heavy Quarks at Low-energies,”Phys. Lett. B240(1990) 447–450

1990
[67]

Becher, A

T. Becher, A. Broggio, and A. Ferroglia,Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory, vol. 896. Springer, 2015.arXiv:1410.1892 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[68]

Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics

T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, “Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,”arXiv:2306.00912 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[69]

Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, “Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,”Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.5(1989) 1–91,arXiv:hep-ph/0409313

work page Pith review arXiv 1989
[70]

Agarwal, L

N. Agarwal, L. Magnea, C. Signorile-Signorile, and A. Tripathi, “The infrared structure of perturbative gauge theories,”Phys. Rept.994(2023) 1–120, arXiv:2112.07099 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[71]

Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics,

P. P. Kulish and L. D. Faddeev, “Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics,”Theor. Math. Phys.4(1970) 745

1970
[72]

Hannesdottir and M.D

H. Hannesdottir and M. D. Schwartz, “S-Matrix for massless particles,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 10, (2020) 105001,arXiv:1911.06821 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[73]

Soft Factorization in QED from 2D Kac-Moody Symmetry,

A. Nande, M. Pate, and A. Strominger, “Soft Factorization in QED from 2D Kac-Moody Symmetry,”JHEP02(2018) 079,arXiv:1705.00608 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[74]

Infinite-dimensional fermionic symmetry in supersymmetric gauge theories,

T. T. Dumitrescu, T. He, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, “Infinite-dimensional fermionic symmetry in supersymmetric gauge theories,”JHEP08(2021) 051, arXiv:1511.07429 [hep-th]. 34

work page arXiv 2021