pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07061 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.soft· cond-mat.stat-mech

Topological Defects in Amorphous Solids

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords topological defectsamorphous solidsglassesmechanical propertiesplasticitydisordered materialstopological concepts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Certain observables linked to topological defects can be identified in amorphous solids, providing a potential first-principles framework for their mechanical properties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This perspective reviews how topological defects, long used to explain properties in crystals, are being extended to disordered materials such as glasses. Without a clear lattice, definitions rely on identifying analogous observables like stress fields or particle rearrangements. If these concepts hold, they could replace phenomenological models with a unified topological description of failure, flow, and dynamics in amorphous solids. The work summarizes theoretical, simulation, and experimental advances in this area while noting remaining challenges.

Core claim

Topological defects are crucial for crystalline materials but hard to define in glasses due to lack of reference structure. Recent studies show that certain associated observables can be identified in disordered solids, suggesting topological concepts are crucial for mechanical response and complex spatiotemporal dynamics.

What carries the argument

Topological defect observables identified without a periodic reference lattice in disordered solids.

If this is right

  • Mechanical failure and plasticity in amorphous solids can be linked directly to the presence and motion of defect-like structures.
  • Ion transport and melting-like transitions in glasses become describable using topological rules.
  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of flow and relaxation follow patterns governed by these defects rather than ad hoc parameters.
  • A first-principles alternative emerges to replace purely phenomenological modeling of glass response.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This framework could enable predictive design of amorphous materials by engineering their defect populations for desired strength or ductility.
  • Similar defect identification methods might apply to other disordered systems such as granular media or biological tissues.
  • Numerical tools for tracking these observables could become standard in simulations of glass deformation.

Load-bearing premise

That observables commonly associated with topological defects in crystals can be meaningfully identified and are relevant in disordered solids that lack an obvious reference structure.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation demonstrating that these defect observables are absent or show no correlation with mechanical failure, plasticity, or dynamic heterogeneities in a well-characterized amorphous solid.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07061 by Matteo Baggioli, Michael L. Falk, Walter Kob.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Topological defects (TDs) are crucial for understanding important physical properties of crystalline materials including mechanical failure, ion transport, and two-dimensional melting. This concept has not translated to disordered materials like glasses because these solids have no obvious reference structure that can be used to define TDs. As a result, key properties related to those listed above have typically been modeled using purely phenomenological approaches. Recent studies have demonstrated that certain observables commonly associated with TDs can also be identified in disordered solids indicating that topological concepts may be as crucial in amorphous solids as in crystals. This hints that TDs may offer a first-principles framework for understanding their mechanical response and complex spatiotemporal dynamics. In this Perspective, we review recent theoretical, numerical, and experimental studies that have exploited topological concepts to rationalize mechanical properties of amorphous solids. We also highlight pressing open questions and some promising directions for future research in the field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This Perspective reviews the extension of topological defect (TD) concepts from crystalline materials—where they explain mechanical failure, ion transport, and melting—to amorphous solids such as glasses. It notes the absence of an obvious reference structure in disordered systems has historically led to phenomenological modeling, but highlights recent theoretical, numerical, and experimental studies that identify TD-associated observables in glasses. The manuscript suggests these concepts may provide a first-principles framework for mechanical response and spatiotemporal dynamics, while outlining open questions and future directions.

Significance. If the reviewed literature accurately establishes the relevance of topological observables in amorphous solids, the Perspective could help bridge concepts from ordered to disordered materials, offering a more unified approach to glass mechanics beyond phenomenology. As a synthesis rather than new derivations or data, its value lies in curation of the field and identification of promising research avenues.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that TDs 'may offer a first-principles framework' but the manuscript should more explicitly qualify this as a hypothesis pending further validation, given the acknowledged lack of reference structure.
  2. Section headings and transitions between theoretical, numerical, and experimental subsections could be clarified to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  3. A few citations appear to be from preprints; the authors should confirm journal versions or add DOIs where available for permanence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our Perspective and for recommending minor revision. The referee's description accurately reflects the manuscript's scope as a review of recent work applying topological defect concepts to amorphous solids. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; literature synthesis without derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a Perspective review paper that synthesizes existing theoretical, numerical, and experimental studies on topological concepts in amorphous solids. It presents no original derivations, equations, predictions, or first-principles results. The central suggestion is a cautious 'hint' based on recent external literature, with explicit acknowledgment of open questions and the lack of a reference structure. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-citations, fitted inputs, or ansatzes by construction, so the text is self-contained as a review.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review article, the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all concepts are drawn from the cited prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5466 in / 994 out tokens · 46729 ms · 2026-05-10T17:23:54.725594+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unifying Plasticity in Ordered and Disordered Matter using Topological and Geometrical Descriptors

    cond-mat.soft 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Topological defect density fields correlate with plastic rearrangements in both simulated 2D glasses and experimental 2D/3D granular systems while reducing to standard crystal defects.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 128 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bhattacharjee, M

    S. Bhattacharjee, M. Mj, and A. Bandyopadhyay, Topology and Condensed Matter Physics, Texts and Readings in Physical Sciences (Springer Nature Singa- pore, 2017)

  2. [2]

    Ara´ ujo, P

    M. Ara´ ujo, P. Sacramento, and P. Sacramento,Topol- ogy in Condensed Matter: An Introduction, G - Refer- ence,Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series (World Scientific, 2021)

  3. [3]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

  4. [4]

    Wang and S.-C

    J. Wang and S.-C. Zhang, Nature Materials16, 1062 (2017)

  5. [5]

    B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Nature 603, 41 (2022)

  6. [6]

    Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics(CRC Press, 2018)

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics(CRC Press, 2018)

  7. [7]

    F. S. Wells, A. V. Pan, X. R. Wang, S. A. Fedoseev, and H. Hilgenkamp, Scientific Reports5, 8677 (2015)

  8. [8]

    D. J. G. Pearce, J. Nambisan, P. W. Ellis, A. Fernandez- Nieves, and L. Giomi, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 197801 (2021)

  9. [9]

    C. L. Jia, A. Thust, and K. Urban, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 225506 (2005)

  10. [10]

    J. H. Warner, E. R. Margine, M. Mukai, A. W. Robert- son, F. Giustino, and A. I. Kirkland, Science337, 209 (2012)

  11. [11]

    Nash, arXiv preprint hep-th/9709135 (1997)

    C. Nash, arXiv preprint hep-th/9709135 (1997)

  12. [12]

    Weingarten, Rend

    M. Weingarten, Rend. Accad. Lincei10, 57 (1901)

  13. [13]

    Volterra, Ec

    V. Volterra, Ec. nerm. sup., Paris [3]24, 400 (1907)

  14. [14]

    W. G. Burgers, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences371, 125 (1980)

  15. [15]

    Sluckin, Liquid Crystals Today8, 1 (1998)

    T. Sluckin, Liquid Crystals Today8, 1 (1998)

  16. [16]

    Frenkel, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik37, 572 (1926)

    J. Frenkel, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik37, 572 (1926)

  17. [17]

    Orowan, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik89, 634 (1934)

    E. Orowan, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik89, 634 (1934)

  18. [18]

    Polanyi, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik89, 660 (1934)

    M. Polanyi, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik89, 660 (1934)

  19. [19]

    G. I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A145, 362 (1934)

  20. [20]

    J. E. Avron, D. Osadchy, and R. Seiler, Physics Today 56, 38 (2003)

  21. [21]

    Hatsugai, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter9, 2507 (1997)

    Y. Hatsugai, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter9, 2507 (1997)

  22. [22]

    Stern and N

    A. Stern and N. H. Lindner, Science339, 1179 (2013)

  23. [23]

    D. R. Nelson,Defects and geometry in condensed matter physics(Cambridge University Press, 2002)

  24. [24]

    Kleinert,Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol

    H. Kleinert,Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol. 1: Superflow and Vortex Lines (Disorder Fields, Phase Transitions) Vol. 2: Stresses and Defects (Differential Geometry, Crystal Melting)(World Scientific, 1989)

  25. [25]

    J. V. Selinger,Introduction to topological defects and solitons: in liquid crystals, magnets, and related ma- terials, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 1032 (Springer, Cham, 2024) pp. XIII, 213 pages : illustrations

  26. [26]

    Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, Second Edition, Graduate student series in physics (Taylor & Francis, 2003)

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, Second Edition, Graduate student series in physics (Taylor & Francis, 2003)

  27. [27]

    Richeson,Euler’s Gem: The Polyhedron Formula and the Birth of Topology, Princeton Science Library (Princeton University Press, 2019)

    D. Richeson,Euler’s Gem: The Polyhedron Formula and the Birth of Topology, Princeton Science Library (Princeton University Press, 2019)

  28. [28]

    Fumeron and B

    S. Fumeron and B. Berche, The European Physical Journal Special Topics232, 1813 (2023)

  29. [29]

    Kotschick, American Scientist94, 328 (2006)

    D. Kotschick, American Scientist94, 328 (2006)

  30. [30]

    Hull and D

    D. Hull and D. J. Bacon,Introduction to dislocations, Vol. 37 (Elsevier, 2011)

  31. [31]

    P. M. Anderson, J. P. Hirth, and J. Lothe,Theory of dislocations(Cambridge University Press, 2017)

  32. [32]

    B. A. Bilby, R. Bullough, and E. Smith, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences231, 263 (1955)

  33. [33]

    Kazuo, International Journal of Engineering Science 2, 219 (1964)

    K. Kazuo, International Journal of Engineering Science 2, 219 (1964)

  34. [34]

    J. M. Kosterlitz, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 040501 (2017)

  35. [35]

    Z. Chen, X. Chi, J. Li, K. Men, P. Huang, F. Wang, B. Sun, H. Ke, and W. Wang, Intermetallics143, 107496 (2022)

  36. [36]

    Falk and J

    M. Falk and J. Langer, Physical Review E57, 7192 (1998)

  37. [37]

    Schall, D

    P. Schall, D. A. Weitz, and F. Spaepen, Science318, 1895 (2007)

  38. [38]

    Richard, G

    D. Richard, G. Kapteijns, J. A. Giannini, M. L. Man- ning, and E. Lerner, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 015501 (2021)

  39. [39]

    Varshneya and M

    A. Varshneya and M. J.C.,Fundamentals of Inorganic Glasses(Elsevier Science, 2019)

  40. [40]

    Binder and W

    K. Binder and W. Kob,Glassy Materials and Disordered Solids: An Introduction to Their Statistical Mechanics, G - Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Sub- jects Series (World Scientific, 2011)

  41. [41]

    Y. Yang, J. Zhou, F. Zhu, Y. Yuan, D. J. Chang, D. S. Kim, M. Pham, A. Rana, X. Tian, Y. Yao, S. J. Osher, A. K. Schmid, L. Hu, P. Ercius, and J. Miao, Nature 592, 60 (2021)

  42. [42]

    Lichtenstein, M

    L. Lichtenstein, M. Heyde, and H.-J. Freund, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry C116, 20426 (2012)

  43. [43]

    C. P. Royall and S. R. Williams, Physics Reports560, 1 (2015), the role of local structure in dynamical arrest

  44. [44]

    Cavagna, Physics Reports476, 51 (2009)

    A. Cavagna, Physics Reports476, 51 (2009)

  45. [45]

    J. C. Phillips and M. Thorpe, Solid State Communica- tions53, 699 (1985)

  46. [46]

    Egami, S

    T. Egami, S. Poon, Z. Zhang, and V. Keppens, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 76, 024203 (2007)

  47. [47]

    P. K. Gupta and D. B. Miracle, Acta materialia55, 4507 (2007)

  48. [48]

    J. C. Mauroet al., American Ceramic Society Bulletin 90, 31 (2011)

  49. [49]

    Srolovitz, K

    D. Srolovitz, K. Maeda, V. Vitek, and T. Egami, Philo- sophical Magazine A44, 847 (1981). 10

  50. [50]

    Rivier and D

    N. Rivier and D. Duffy, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics15, 2867 (1982)

  51. [51]

    Sachdev and D

    S. Sachdev and D. R. Nelson, Physical Review B32, 4592 (1985)

  52. [52]

    Sadoc and N

    J. Sadoc and N. Rivier, Philosophical Magazine B55, 537 (1987)

  53. [53]

    Lee, C.-M

    M. Lee, C.-M. Lee, K.-R. Lee, E. Ma, and J.-C. Lee, Acta Materialia59, 159 (2011)

  54. [54]

    Ding, Y.-Q

    J. Ding, Y.-Q. Cheng, and E. Ma, Acta materialia69, 343 (2014)

  55. [55]

    C. K. C. Lieou and T. Egami, Scientific Reports13, 15979 (2023)

  56. [56]

    Gilman, Journal of Applied Physics44, 675 (1973)

    J. Gilman, Journal of Applied Physics44, 675 (1973)

  57. [57]

    J. J. Gilman, Journal of applied Physics46, 1625 (1975)

  58. [58]

    Chaudhari, A

    P. Chaudhari, A. Levi, and P. Steinhardt, Physical Re- view Letters43, 1517 (1979)

  59. [59]

    P. J. Steinhardt and P. Chaudhari, Philosophical Mag- azine A44, 1375 (1981)

  60. [60]

    Argon, Acta metallurgica27, 47 (1979)

    A. Argon, Acta metallurgica27, 47 (1979)

  61. [61]

    M. L. Manning and A. J. Liu, Physical Review Letters 107, 108302 (2011)

  62. [62]

    C. E. Maloney and A. Lemaitre, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics74, 016118 (2006)

  63. [63]

    Tanguy, B

    A. Tanguy, B. Mantisi, and M. Tsamados, Europhysics Letters90, 16004 (2010)

  64. [64]

    Rottler, S

    J. Rottler, S. S. Schoenholz, and A. J. Liu, Physical Review E89, 042304 (2014)

  65. [65]

    Tanguy, Jom67, 1832 (2015)

    A. Tanguy, Jom67, 1832 (2015)

  66. [66]

    Richard, M

    D. Richard, M. Ozawa, S. Patinet, E. Stanifer, B. Shang, S. A. Ridout, B. Xu, G. Zhang, P. K. Morse, J.-L. Barrat, L. Berthier, M. L. Falk, P. Guan, A. J. Liu, K. Martens, S. Sastry, D. Vandembroucq, E. Lerner, and M. L. Manning, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 113609 (2020)

  67. [67]

    Tong and H

    H. Tong and H. Tanaka, Physical Review X8, 011041 (2018)

  68. [68]

    Kawasaki, T

    T. Kawasaki, T. Araki, and H. Tanaka, Physical review letters99, 215701 (2007)

  69. [69]

    J. M. Rieser, C. P. Goodrich, A. J. Liu, and D. J. Durian, Physical review letters116, 088001 (2016)

  70. [70]

    P. M. Piaggi and M. Parrinello, The Journal of chemical physics147(2017)

  71. [71]

    E. D. Cubuk, S. S. Schoenholz, J. M. Rieser, B. D. Mal- one, J. Rottler, D. J. Durian, E. Kaxiras, and A. J. Liu, Physical review letters114, 108001 (2015)

  72. [72]

    S. S. Schoenholz, E. D. Cubuk, D. M. Sussman, E. Kaxi- ras, and A. J. Liu, Nature Physics12, 469 (2016)

  73. [73]

    Ronhovde, S

    P. Ronhovde, S. Chakrabarty, D. Hu, M. Sahu, K. Sahu, K. Kelton, N. Mauro, and Z. Nussinov, The European Physical Journal E34, 105 (2011)

  74. [74]

    Boattini, M

    E. Boattini, M. Dijkstra, and L. Filion, The Journal of chemical physics151(2019)

  75. [75]

    Widmer-Cooper, H

    A. Widmer-Cooper, H. Perry, P. Harrowell, and D. R. Reichman, Nature Physics4, 711 (2008)

  76. [76]

    Zylberg, E

    J. Zylberg, E. Lerner, Y. Bar-Sinai, and E. Bouch- binder, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences114, 7289 (2017)

  77. [77]

    Tong and N

    H. Tong and N. Xu, Physical Review E90, 010401 (2014)

  78. [78]

    Tsamados, A

    M. Tsamados, A. Tanguy, C. Goldenberg, and J.-L. Barrat, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics80, 026112 (2009)

  79. [79]

    Schwartzman-Nowik, E

    Z. Schwartzman-Nowik, E. Lerner, and E. Bouchbinder, Physical Review E99, 060601 (2019)

  80. [80]

    B. Xu, M. L. Falk, S. Patinet, and P. Guan, Physical Review Materials5, 025603 (2021)

Showing first 80 references.