arxiv: 2604.07564 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Statistical hadronization: successes and some open issues

A. Andronic , P. Braun-Munzinger , K. Redlich , J. Stachel

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th

keywords statistical hadronizationheavy-ion collisionsQCD phase structurehadron yieldsthermal equilibriumcharm quarksbeauty quarks

0 comments

The pith

The statistical hadronization model accounts for hadron yields in nuclear collisions across energies for light and heavy quarks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews evidence that the statistical hadronization model successfully describes the production rates of hadrons created in relativistic nuclear collisions. This description holds across a wide span of collision energies and applies both to particles built from light quarks and to those containing heavy charm or beauty quarks. A sympathetic reader would care because the match between data and model suggests the collision creates a near-equilibrium state whose properties can be read from the final particle counts. The authors use this framework to discuss recent constraints on the phase structure of quantum chromodynamics and to list several open questions that remain.

Core claim

Hadron production in relativistic nuclear collisions is well described in the framework of the statistical hadronization model, over a broad range of collision energies. The model applies to hadrons composed of light (u, d, s) and heavy (charm and beauty) quarks, with recent findings relevant for understanding the phase structure of QCD and some open issues formulated.

What carries the argument

The statistical hadronization model, which assumes hadrons emerge from a thermally equilibrated source characterized by a common temperature and chemical potentials for baryon number, strangeness, and charge.

Load-bearing premise

The statistical hadronization model applies uniformly and accurately to both light-quark and heavy-quark hadrons without significant non-equilibrium effects or model-specific adjustments.

What would settle it

Persistent, systematic deviations in the measured yields of charm or beauty hadrons that cannot be removed by adjusting only the temperature and chemical potentials used for light hadrons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07564 by A. Andronic, J. Stachel, K. Redlich, P. Braun-Munzinger.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Mass dependence of hadron yields divided by the spin degeneracy factor (2J + 1), SHM best fit in comparison to the ALICE data. For the SHM are plotted both the “total” yields, including strong and electromagnetic decays, and the “primordial” thermal yields. Figure taken from [26]. Very good agreement is obtained between the measured particle yields and SHM over nine orders of magnitude in abundance va… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Left: Energy dependence of chemical freeze-out parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Phase diagram of strongly interacting matter constructed from chemical freeze-out points for central collisions at different energies, extracted from experimental data sets in our own (squares) and other similar analyses [40, 41, 42, 31] are compared to predictions from LQCD [12, 13, 16] shown as bands. For the location of a possible critical endpoint (CEP) see [17]. Since the statistical hadronization… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: J/ψ to D0 ratio measured in Pb–Pb collisions at the LHC and predicted by the Statistical Hadronization Model with charm SHMc. Figure from [61]. charm mesons and baryons, this is not the case and feeding from excited D∗ , Λ∗ c , and Σ∗ c is an essential ingredient for the description of open charm hadrons [44]. Even though the experimental mass spectrum of excited open charm hadrons is not complete, in part… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Hadron production in relativistic nuclear collisions is well described in the framework of the statistical hadronization model, over a broad range of collision energies. We outline this for hadrons composed of light (u, d, s) and heavy (charm and beauty) quarks, discuss recent findings relevant for understanding the phase structure of QCD and formulate some open issues.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This review collects the statistical hadronization model's track record for light and heavy hadrons but adds no new derivations or data.

read the letter

This review collects the statistical hadronization model's track record for light and heavy hadrons but adds no new derivations or data. The authors lay out how a small set of parameters reproduces yields from low to high collision energies and extend the same picture to charm and beauty particles. They also link the extracted freeze-out conditions to the QCD phase diagram and list several open questions that remain after decades of work. That breadth is the main value here. It gives a single place to see the model's reach across sectors without having to chase separate papers for light flavors versus heavy ones. The discussion of phase structure connections is straightforward and draws on the group's earlier fits. The open issues section flags real gaps, such as how well the model holds when non-equilibrium effects or initial-state production become important. The soft spot is that the paper is a review, not a new analysis. The central claim that the model 'well describes' production rests on the cited literature rather than fresh fits or error breakdowns shown here. For heavy quarks the uniform framework assumes the same chemical freeze-out hypersurface works without large extra adjustments. If the full text shows separate charm fugacity factors or systematically larger residuals for D mesons and J/ψ compared with pions and protons, that would limit how strongly the uniform description can be claimed. The citation pattern is appropriate and points to the key experimental and theoretical references. This paper is for heavy-ion physicists who want a current snapshot of where the model stands and what problems are still open. It would be worth bringing to a reading group to talk through the heavy-quark section and the listed issues. It deserves peer review as a review article because it organizes the literature and highlights the remaining questions even though the core results are not new.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the statistical hadronization model and asserts that it well describes hadron production in relativistic nuclear collisions over a broad range of energies for both light and heavy quark hadrons. It discusses implications for the QCD phase structure and lists open issues.

Significance. If the model's success is substantiated by the data fits in the full manuscript, this work would be significant for providing a simple thermal framework that unifies descriptions across different flavor sectors and energies, aiding in the interpretation of heavy-ion collision data and the study of QCD matter properties.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states the model 'well describes' production but would be strengthened by referencing specific datasets or collision energies.
Consider adding a figure or table comparing model predictions to data for a representative set of hadrons including heavy flavors to make the uniform applicability claim more concrete.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its potential significance, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical review without derivation chain or self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper is a review summarizing empirical successes of the statistical hadronization model in describing hadron yields across energies for light and heavy quarks, without presenting any new derivation, first-principles result, or prediction that reduces to its own inputs. Claims rest on data comparisons and parameter fits (T, μ_B, etc.) to external experimental results rather than internal loops. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that substitute for independent verification are present. The central description is self-contained as an observational summary with open issues noted, consistent with the absence of a claimed derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract was available, preventing identification of specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the model applications discussed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5350 in / 1011 out tokens · 37708 ms · 2026-05-10T17:08:50.014885+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

[1]

Hydrostatic Equilibrium of Hypothetical Quark Stars,

N. Itoh, “Hydrostatic Equilibrium of Hypothetical Quark Stars,”Prog. Theor. Phys.44(1970) 291

1970
[2]

Superdense Matter: Neutrons Or Asymptotically Free Quarks?,

J. C. Collins and M. Perry, “Superdense Matter: Neutrons Or Asymptotically Free Quarks?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.34(1975) 1353

1975
[3]

Exponential Hadronic Spectrum and Quark Liberation,

N. Cabibbo and G. Parisi, “Exponential Hadronic Spectrum and Quark Liberation,”Phys. Lett. B59(1975) 67–69

1975
[4]

Asymptotic Freedom and the Baryon-Quark Phase Transition,

G. Chapline and M. Nauenberg, “Asymptotic Freedom and the Baryon-Quark Phase Transition,”Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 450

1977
[5]

Quark-gluon plasma and hadronic production of leptons, photons and psions,

E. V. Shuryak, “Quark-gluon plasma and hadronic production of leptons, photons and psions,”Phys. Lett. B78(1978) 150

1978
[6]

Phase transitions in the early and the present Universe

D. Boyanovsky, H. de Vega, and D. Schwarz, “Phase transitions in the early and the present universe,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.56(2006) 441–500, arXiv:hep-ph/0602002 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[7]

Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions

W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, “Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68(2018) 339–376,arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[8]

Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions,

P. Braun-Munzinger, V. Koch, T. Sch¨ afer, and J. Stachel, “Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions,”Phys. Rept.621 (2016) 76–126,arXiv:1510.00442 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[10]

Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel, “Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out,”Nucl. Phys. A772 (2006) 167–199,arXiv:nucl-th/0511071

work page arXiv 2006
[11]

Andronic, P

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy,”Nature561 no. 7723, (2018) 321–330,arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]. [12]HotQCDCollaboration, A. Bazavovet al., “Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials,”Phys. Lett. B795(2019) 15–21, arXiv:1812.08235...

work page arXiv 2018
[12]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, “QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 5, (2020) 052001,arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[13]

Curvature of the pseudocritical line in QCD: Taylor expansion matches analytic continuation,

C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, F. Negro, F. Sanfilippo, and K. Zambello, “Curvature of the pseudocritical line in QCD: Taylor expansion matches analytic continuation,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 5, (2018) 054510,arXiv:1805.02960 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2018
[14]

The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics

Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. Katz, and K. Szabo, “The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of 12cracow2026 printed on April 10, 2026 particle physics,”Nature443(2006) 675–678,arXiv:hep-lat/0611014 [hep-lat]

work page Pith review arXiv 2026
[15]

Borsanyiet al., Phys

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, L. Pirelli, K. K. Szabo, and C. H. Wong, “QCD deconfinement transition line up to µB=400 MeV from finite volume lattice simulations,”Phys. Rev. D110 no. 11, (2024) 114507,arXiv:2410.06216 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[16]

Fischer and J.M

C. S. Fischer and J. M. Pawlowski, “Phase structure and observables at high densities from first principles QCD,”arXiv:2603.11135 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[17]

The phase structure of QCD: Fluctuations and Correlations,

P. Braun-Munzinger, A. Rustamov, and N. Xu, “The phase structure of QCD: Fluctuations and Correlations,”arXiv:2601.18666 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv
[18]

The QCD Equation of State toO(µ 6 B) from Lattice QCD,

A. Bazavovet al., “The QCD Equation of State toO(µ 6 B) from Lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 5, (2017) 054504,arXiv:1701.04325 [hep-lat]. [20]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, P. Zylaet al., “Review of Particle Physics,”PTEP2020no. 8, (2020) 083C01

work page arXiv 2017
[19]

The thermal proton yield anomaly in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC and its resolution,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, B. Friman, P. M. Lo, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “The thermal proton yield anomaly in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC and its resolution,”Phys. Lett. B792(2019) 304–309, arXiv:1808.03102 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[20]

Multiplicity dependence of (multi)strange baryons in the canonical ensemble with phase shift corrections,

J. Cleymans, P. M. Lo, K. Redlich, and N. Sharma, “Multiplicity dependence of (multi)strange baryons in the canonical ensemble with phase shift corrections,”Phys. Rev. C103no. 1, (2021) 014904, arXiv:2009.04844 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Yasui, S

S. Yasui, S. H. Lee, P. M. Lo, and C. Sasaki, “New nonet scalar mesons and glueballs: the mass spectra and the production yields in relativistic heavy ion collisions,”arXiv:2603.13764 [hep-ph]. [24]ALICECollaboration, S. Acharyaet al., “Production of 4He and 4He in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV at the LHC,”Nucl. Phys. A971 (2018) 1–20,arXiv:1710.075...

work page arXiv 2018
[22]

Hadron yields in central nucleus-nucleus collisions, the statistical hadronization model and the QCD phase diagram,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Hadron yields in central nucleus-nucleus collisions, the statistical hadronization model and the QCD phase diagram,” inCriticality in QCD and the Hadron Resonance Gas. 1, 2021.arXiv:2101.05747 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

Influence of modified light-flavor hadron spectra on particle yields in the statistical hadronization model,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, D. G¨ und¨ uz, Y. Kirchhoff, M. K. K¨ ohler, J. Stachel, and M. Winn, “Influence of modified light-flavor hadron spectra on particle yields in the statistical hadronization model,”Nucl. Phys. A 1010(2021) 122176,arXiv:2011.03826 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[24]

Andronicet al., Phys

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, and H. St¨ ocker, “Production of light nuclei, hypernuclei and their antiparticles in relativistic nuclear collisions,”Phys. Lett. B697(2011) 203–207,arXiv:1010.2995 [nucl-th]. cracow2026 printed on April 10, 202613

work page arXiv 2011
[25]

Loosely-bound objects produced in nuclear collisions at the LHC,

P. Braun-Munzinger and B. D¨ onigus, “Loosely-bound objects produced in nuclear collisions at the LHC,”Nucl. Phys. A987(2019) 144–201, arXiv:1809.04681 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2019
[26]

An overview of the experimental study of quark-gluon matter in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions,

A. Andronic, “An overview of the experimental study of quark-gluon matter in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29(2014) 1430047,arXiv:1407.5003 [nucl-ex]. [31]ST ARCollaboration, L. Adamczyket al., “Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program,”Phys. Rev. C96no. 4, ...

work page arXiv 2014
[27]

Statistical Thermodynamics in Relativistic Particle and Ion Physics: Canonical or Grand Canonical?,

R. Hagedorn and K. Redlich, “Statistical Thermodynamics in Relativistic Particle and Ion Physics: Canonical or Grand Canonical?,”Z. Phys. C27 (1985) 541

1985
[28]

Canonical description of strangeness enhancement from p-A to Pb Pb collisions,

S. Hamieh, K. Redlich, and A. Tounsi, “Canonical description of strangeness enhancement from p-A to Pb Pb collisions,”Phys. Lett.B486(2000) 61–66, arXiv:hep-ph/0006024 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2000
[29]

Braun-Munzinger, K

P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Particle production in heavy ion collisions. InQuark Gluon Plasma 3, eds. R. C. Hwa and Xin-Nian Wang, World Scientific Publishing, 491–599,”arXiv:nucl-th/0304013

work page arXiv
[30]

Dynamics of ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions with heavy beams: An Experimental overview,

P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, “Dynamics of ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions with heavy beams: An Experimental overview,”Nucl. Phys. A638 (1998) 3–18,arXiv:nucl-ex/9803015 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 1998
[31]

The parton to hadron phase transition observed in Pb+Pb collisions at 158-GeV per nucleon,

R. Stock, “The parton to hadron phase transition observed in Pb+Pb collisions at 158-GeV per nucleon,”Phys. Lett. B456(1999) 277–282, arXiv:hep-ph/9905247 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 1999
[32]

Chemical freezeout and the QCD phase transition temperature,

P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, and C. Wetterich, “Chemical freezeout and the QCD phase transition temperature,”Phys. Lett. B596(2004) 61–69, arXiv:nucl-th/0311005 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2004
[33]

Thermal hadron production in relativistic nuclear collisions: the hadron mass spectrum, the horn, and the QCD phase transition,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel, “Thermal hadron production in relativistic nuclear collisions: the hadron mass spectrum, the horn, and the QCD phase transition,”Phys. Lett. B673(2009) 142–145, arXiv:0812.1186 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2009
[34]

Statistical thermodynamics of strong interactions at high-energies,

R. Hagedorn, “Statistical thermodynamics of strong interactions at high-energies,”Nuovo Cim. Suppl.3(1965) 147–186

1965
[35]

Influence of impact parameter on thermal description of relativistic heavy ion collisions at (1-2) A-GeV,

J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, and K. Redlich, “Influence of impact parameter on thermal description of relativistic heavy ion collisions at (1-2) A-GeV,”Phys. Rev. C59(1999) 1663,arXiv:nucl-th/9809027 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 1999
[36]

Vovchenko, V

V. Vovchenko, V. V. Begun, and M. I. Gorenstein, “Hadron multiplicities and chemical freeze-out conditions in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions,”Phys. Rev. C93no. 6, (2016) 064906,arXiv:1512.08025 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[37]

Hadronization conditions in relativistic nuclear collisions and the QCD pseudo-critical line,

F. Becattini, J. Steinheimer, R. Stock, and M. Bleicher, “Hadronization conditions in relativistic nuclear collisions and the QCD pseudo-critical line,” Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 241–246,arXiv:1605.09694 [nucl-th]. 14cracow2026 printed on April 10, 2026 [43]ALICECollaboration, S. Acharyaet al., “Prompt D 0, D+, and D ∗+ production in Pb–Pb collisions at √sNN...

work page arXiv 2017
[38]

The multiple-charm hierarchy in the statistical hadronization model,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, M. K. K¨ ohler, A. Mazeliauskas, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, and V. Vislavicius, “The multiple-charm hierarchy in the statistical hadronization model,”JHEP07(2021) 035, arXiv:2104.12754 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[39]

Transverse momentum distributions of charmonium states with the statistical hadronization model,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, M. K. K¨ ohler, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Transverse momentum distributions of charmonium states with the statistical hadronization model,”Phys. Lett. B797(2019) 134836, arXiv:1901.09200 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

Altenkort, A

L. Altenkort, A. M. Eller, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G. D. Moore, and H.-T. Shu, “Heavy quark momentum diffusion from the lattice using gradient flow,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 1, (2021) 014511,arXiv:2009.13553 [hep-lat]. [47]HotQCDCollaboration, L. Altenkort, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, H.-T. Shu, and S. Stendebach, “Heavy Quark Diffusio...

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Collectivity of J/ψMesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions,

M. He, B. Wu, and R. Rapp, “Collectivity of J/ψMesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 16, (2022) 162301,arXiv:2111.13528 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

Cho, K.-J

S. Cho, K.-J. Sun, C. M. Ko, S. H. Lee, and Y. Oh, “Charmed hadron production in an improved quark coalescence model,”Phys. Rev. C101 no. 2, (2020) 024909,arXiv:1905.09774 [nucl-th]. [51]ExHICCollaboration, S. Choet al., “Exotic hadrons from heavy ion collisions,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.95(2017) 279–322,arXiv:1702.00486 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[43]

Medium effects on charmonium production at ultrarelativistic energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,

K. Zhou, N. Xu, Z. Xu, and P. Zhuang, “Medium effects on charmonium production at ultrarelativistic energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,”Phys. Rev. C89(2014) 054911,arXiv:1401.5845 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[44]

Quark coalescence for charmed mesons in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,

V. Greco, C. Ko, and R. Rapp, “Quark coalescence for charmed mesons in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,”Phys. Lett. B595(2004) 202–208, arXiv:nucl-th/0312100 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2004
[45]

Heavy-flavor production and medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions - What next?,

G. Aartset al., “Heavy-flavor production and medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions - What next?,”Eur. Phys. J. A53no. 5, (2017) 93,arXiv:1612.08032 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[46]

GGI Lectures on Exotic Hadrons,

L. Maiani and A. Pilloni, “GGI Lectures on Exotic Hadrons,” 7, 2022. arXiv:2207.05141 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[47]

Prerequisites for heavy quark coalescence in heavy-ion collisions,

T. Song and G. Coci, “Prerequisites for heavy quark coalescence in heavy-ion collisions,”Nucl. Phys. A1028(2022) 122539,arXiv:2104.10987 [nucl-th]. cracow2026 printed on April 10, 202615

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

(Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look at J / psi suppression,

P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, “(Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look at J / psi suppression,”Phys. Lett. B490(2000) 196–202,arXiv:nucl-th/0007059

work page arXiv 2000
[49]

Statistical hadronization of charm in heavy ion collisions at SPS, RHIC and LHC,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Statistical hadronization of charm in heavy ion collisions at SPS, RHIC and LHC,” Phys. Lett. B571(2003) 36–44,arXiv:nucl-th/0303036 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2003
[50]

Statistical hadronization of heavy quarks in ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Statistical hadronization of heavy quarks in ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions,” Nucl. Phys. A789(2007) 334–356,arXiv:nucl-th/0611023 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2007
[51]

J/ψsuppression by quark-gluon plasma formation,

T. Matsui and H. Satz, “J/ψsuppression by quark-gluon plasma formation,” Phys. Lett. B178(1986) 416. [61]ALICECollaboration, S. Acharyaet al., “Measurements of inclusive J/ψ production at midrapidity and forward rapidity in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV,”Phys. Lett. B849(2024) 138451,arXiv:2303.13361 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 1986
[52]

Transverse dynamics of charmed hadrons in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, H. Brunßen, J. Crkovsk´ a, J. Stachel, V. Vislavicius, and M. V¨ olkl, “Transverse dynamics of charmed hadrons in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions,”JHEP10(2024) 229, arXiv:2308.14821 [hep-ph]. [63]ALICECollaboration, S. Acharyaet al., “The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 8, (2024) 813, ar...

work page arXiv 2024
[53]

LargeN c QCD phase diagram atµ B = 0,

T. D. Cohen and L. Y. Glozman, “LargeN c QCD phase diagram atµ B = 0,” Eur. Phys. J. A60no. 9, (2024) 171,arXiv:2311.07333 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

Fujimoto, K

Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, Y. Hidaka, and L. McLerran, “New state of matter between the hadronic phase and the quark-gluon plasma?,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 7, (2025) 074006,arXiv:2506.00237 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

A Decade of Collectivity in Small Systems,

J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus and U. A. Wiedemann, “A Decade of Collectivity in Small Systems,”arXiv:2407.07484 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv
[56]

Emergence of new systematics for open charm production in high energy collisions,

P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, N. Sharma, and J. Stachel, “Emergence of new systematics for open charm production in high energy collisions,”JHEP 04(2025) 058,arXiv:2408.07496 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Strange cluster formation in relativistic heavy ion collisions,

A. J. Baltz, C. B. Dover, S. H. Kahana, Y. Pang, T. J. Schlagel, and E. Schnedermann, “Strange cluster formation in relativistic heavy ion collisions,”Phys. Lett. B325(1994) 7–12

1994
[58]

Production of strange clusters and strange matter in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the AGS,

P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, “Production of strange clusters and strange matter in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the AGS,”J. Phys. G21 (1995) L17–L20,arXiv:nucl-th/9412035

work page arXiv 1995
[59]

Reichert, J

T. Reichert, J. Steinheimer, V. Vovchenko, B. D¨ onigus, and M. Bleicher, “Energy dependence of light hypernuclei production in heavy-ion collisions from a coalescence and statistical-thermal model perspective,”Phys. Rev. C 107no. 1, (2023) 014912,arXiv:2210.11876 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

SQM2022: Theoretical Summary,

B. M¨ uller, “SQM2022: Theoretical Summary,”EPJ Web Conf.276(2023) 06017,arXiv:2209.00070 [hep-ph]. 16cracow2026 printed on April 10, 2026

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

The Effect of Nuclear Size on the Production of Nuclei and Hypernuclei in the Statistical Hadronization Model,

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, H. Brunßen, and J. Stachel, “The Effect of Nuclear Size on the Production of Nuclei and Hypernuclei in the Statistical Hadronization Model,”in preparation(2026)

2026
[62]

Yields of weakly-bound light nuclei as a probe of the statistical hadronization model,

Y. Cai, T. D. Cohen, B. A. Gelman, and Y. Yamauchi, “Yields of weakly-bound light nuclei as a probe of the statistical hadronization model,” Phys. Rev. C100no. 2, (2019) 024911,arXiv:1905.02753 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[63]

Hypertriton puzzle in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

T. Cohen and M. Pradeep, “Hypertriton puzzle in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,”Phys. Rev. C111no. 5, (2025) 054917,arXiv:2410.05569 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2025