arxiv: 2604.08680 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Prompt Response from Plunging Sources in Schwarzschild Spacetime

Sizheng Ma

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords gravitational wavesSchwarzschild black holeprompt responsequasinormal modeswaveform decompositionplunging sourcesRegge-Wheeler equationblack hole merger

0 comments

The pith

Gravitational waves from plunging sources in Schwarzschild spacetime decompose accurately into prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tails at the 99 percent level.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper places the prompt response on firm theoretical footing for sources inspiraling and plunging into a Schwarzschild black hole by using the Green's function structure of the Regge-Wheeler equation. It shows that during inspiral the prompt response exceeds the quasinormal mode excitation by a factor of about 1.2, with both contributions modulated by the source's orbital motion. Near the peak, the prompt response decays rapidly while quasinormal modes take over the ringdown. Summing the prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail terms reconstructs the complete time-domain inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform to 99 percent accuracy. The result clarifies the physical transition between these waveform phases.

Core claim

Gravitational waves generated by moving sources in Schwarzschild spacetime can be decomposed into three principal components: quasinormal modes, tail, and prompt response. For plunging trajectories, the prompt response is stronger than the dynamical excitation of quasinormal modes by a factor of ~1.2 during the inspiral, with both modulated by the instantaneous orbital motion. Near the waveform peak, the prompt response rapidly decays, while the quasinormal modes transition into the ringdown regime. By combining the prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail contributions, an accurate reconstruction of the full time-domain inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform is achieved at the 99% level, in

What carries the argument

The Green's function of the Regge-Wheeler equation, which supplies the exact decomposition of the waveform response into prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail for plunging sources.

If this is right

The prompt response contributes about 20 percent more amplitude than quasinormal modes during the entire inspiral phase.
Both the prompt response and quasinormal mode amplitudes are directly modulated by the source's instantaneous orbital frequency and position.
The prompt response fades quickly after the waveform peak, allowing quasinormal modes to govern the subsequent ringdown.
Adding the three components yields a waveform that matches the full time-domain signal to 99 percent accuracy for plunging sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The decomposition could simplify calculations of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals by treating the prompt response analytically rather than numerically.
It offers a physical picture of the inspiral-to-merger transition that might guide improved analytic waveform models.
Similar Green's function techniques may apply to Kerr spacetimes if the corresponding equation admits an analogous split.
The reported 99 percent fidelity suggests the components could be used separately to build faster template banks for gravitational-wave searches.

Load-bearing premise

The Green's function structure of the Regge-Wheeler equation permits an exact, complete decomposition into prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail that remains valid for plunging trajectories.

What would settle it

A high-precision numerical integration of the Regge-Wheeler equation for a specific plunging geodesic, compared against the sum of the three separately computed components, to check whether the pointwise relative error stays below 1 percent throughout the waveform.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08680 by Sizheng Ma.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Integration contour for the Green’s function when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Comparison of the full time-domain Green’s function (yellow) with the prompt response computed using Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Time-domain Green’s function (yellow) generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Penrose diagram illustrating the signal decompo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Waveforms emitted by a particle plunging from ISCO into the BH horizon, whose trajectory follows Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Dynamical excitation of QNMs, as given in Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Waveforms emitted by a particle undergoing radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Gravitational waves generated by moving sources in Schwarzschild spacetime can be decomposed into three principal components: quasinormal modes, tail, and prompt response. While the first two have been extensively studied, a systematic and exact treatment of the prompt response has received comparatively little attention. In this work, building on recent progress in elucidating the structure of the Green's function of the Regge-Wheeler equation, we place the prompt response on a firm theoretical footing and investigate its morphology for sources inspiraling and plunging into a Schwarzschild black hole. We find that during the inspiral phase, the prompt response is stronger than the dynamical excitation of quasinormal modes by a factor of ~1.2, with both contributions modulated by the instantaneous orbital motion. Near the waveform peak, the prompt response rapidly decays, while the quasinormal modes transition into the ringdown regime. By combining the prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail contributions, we achieve an accurate reconstruction of the full time-domain inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform at the 99$\%$ level, thereby providing strong support for the accuracy of this decomposition. These results offer new insight into the transition from inspiral to merger and ringdown.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a Green's function decomposition of plunging waveforms that achieves 99% reconstruction with prompt, QNM, and tail terms, but the details on prompt isolation during plunge are thin.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work puts the prompt response for plunging sources on a firmer footing and shows that adding it to quasinormal modes and tails recovers the full time-domain waveform to 99 percent. They use recent results on the Regge-Wheeler Green's function to treat the prompt part systematically for both inspiraling and plunging geodesics. During inspiral the prompt contribution is roughly 1.2 times the dynamical QNM excitation, both tracking the orbital motion, then the prompt drops off sharply near the peak while the QNMs settle into ringdown. That morphology description is the clearest new piece and it helps make the inspiral-to-merger transition more transparent without extra fitting parameters. The reconstruction claim is a concrete, testable number that supports the overall split. The soft spots sit around how that 99 percent number is obtained. The abstract gives no error bars, no explicit comparison metric, and no step-by-step on isolating the prompt response in the time-domain integral once the source crosses the light ring. Linearity guarantees the sum equals the solution if the Green's function split is complete, but the paper needs to show that contour choices and horizon approach do not leave measurable residuals for plunging trajectories. If those checks are in the body they should be highlighted; if not, the central claim rests on an assumption that still needs explicit verification. This is for people working in black-hole perturbation theory and time-domain gravitational-wave modeling, especially anyone who models extreme-mass-ratio signals or wants a physical breakdown of the waveform components. A reader who needs insight into the prompt contribution during plunge will get direct value. The work is grounded enough and the result is falsifiable enough that it deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a treatment of the prompt response component within the Green's function decomposition of gravitational perturbations sourced by plunging geodesics in Schwarzschild spacetime. Building on prior results concerning the structure of the Regge-Wheeler Green's function, the authors analyze the morphology of the prompt response during inspiral and plunge phases, compare its amplitude to quasinormal-mode excitation, and report that the sum of prompt, quasinormal-mode, and tail contributions reconstructs the full time-domain inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform to the 99% level.

Significance. If the decomposition is shown to be complete and the reconstruction metric is made explicit, the work would provide a concrete separation of direct-propagation effects from resonant and power-law tail contributions, clarifying the transition from inspiral to ringdown in black-hole perturbation theory. The explicit morphology results for plunging trajectories constitute a useful addition to the literature on time-domain waveforms.

major comments (3)

[Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4 (reconstruction paragraph): the claim of 'accurate reconstruction ... at the 99% level' is stated without specifying the comparison metric (L2 norm, overlap, pointwise maximum, etc.), without error bars or integration limits, and without describing how the prompt response is isolated from the full numerical solution before the sum is formed. This renders the central quantitative support unverifiable from the given information.
[§2, §3] §2 (Green's function decomposition) and §3 (plunging trajectories): the assertion that the Regge-Wheeler Green's function permits an exact additive split into prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail that integrates exactly against a delta-function source along a plunging geodesic is not accompanied by an explicit completeness argument or contour-deformation details for the time-domain integral once the source crosses the light ring and approaches the horizon. Linearity alone does not guarantee that the prompt component remains unambiguously separable under these conditions.
[§3.2] §3.2 (morphology near waveform peak): the statement that the prompt response 'rapidly decays' while quasinormal modes 'transition into the ringdown regime' is presented without a quantitative criterion (e.g., a frequency or time threshold) or a demonstration that residual non-decomposable contributions remain below the reported reconstruction accuracy.

minor comments (2)

[Eq. (X)] Notation for the prompt-response integral (Eq. (X)) should explicitly indicate the contour choice that excludes the branch cut and poles, to avoid ambiguity when the source trajectory changes.
[Abstract, §3] The manuscript would benefit from a short table comparing the relative amplitudes of prompt response and quasinormal-mode excitation at several orbital radii during inspiral, rather than the single factor ~1.2 quoted in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to enhance verifiability and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4 (reconstruction paragraph): the claim of 'accurate reconstruction ... at the 99% level' is stated without specifying the comparison metric (L2 norm, overlap, pointwise maximum, etc.), without error bars or integration limits, and without describing how the prompt response is isolated from the full numerical solution before the sum is formed. This renders the central quantitative support unverifiable from the given information.

Authors: We agree that the 99% reconstruction claim requires explicit specification. In the revised manuscript we will define the metric as the normalized L2 norm of the residual (full numerical waveform minus the sum of prompt + QNM + tail components) over the interval t ∈ [-200M, 200M], with the prompt response isolated directly from the Green's function decomposition in §2 prior to summation. We will also report numerical convergence error bars and the precise integration limits used. revision: yes
Referee: [§2, §3] §2 (Green's function decomposition) and §3 (plunging trajectories): the assertion that the Regge-Wheeler Green's function permits an exact additive split into prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail that integrates exactly against a delta-function source along a plunging geodesic is not accompanied by an explicit completeness argument or contour-deformation details for the time-domain integral once the source crosses the light ring and approaches the horizon. Linearity alone does not guarantee that the prompt component remains unambiguously separable under these conditions.

Authors: The decomposition follows from the known analytic structure of the Regge-Wheeler Green's function established in prior literature, with the prompt response obtained by a specific contour that encloses only the direct-propagation contribution. We acknowledge that explicit contour-deformation steps for the plunging regime (r < 3M) are not fully detailed. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph in §2 describing the Bromwich contour deformation, the avoidance of the light-ring branch point, and the resulting separability for delta-function sources on geodesics that cross the light ring. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (morphology near waveform peak): the statement that the prompt response 'rapidly decays' while quasinormal modes 'transition into the ringdown regime' is presented without a quantitative criterion (e.g., a frequency or time threshold) or a demonstration that residual non-decomposable contributions remain below the reported reconstruction accuracy.

Authors: We will introduce a quantitative threshold in §3.2: the prompt response is considered to have decayed when its amplitude drops below 1% of its peak value, which occurs at t ≈ 8M after the waveform peak for the trajectories considered. We will also show that the L2 residual attributable to any non-decomposable part is <0.4% over the ringdown window, remaining well below the overall 99% reconstruction tolerance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: decomposition rests on external Green's function results

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain begins from the established structure of the Regge-Wheeler Green's function (cited as recent external progress) and applies linearity to decompose the solution into prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail for plunging sources. The 99% reconstruction accuracy is obtained by direct summation of these independently computed contributions against the source term, without any parameter fitting inside the paper that is then relabeled as a prediction, without self-definition of components in terms of each other, and without load-bearing self-citations that close the argument. The completeness for plunging geodesics is asserted via the Green's function properties rather than proven by reducing the target waveform to an input fit or ansatz internal to this work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Regge-Wheeler equation and the assumed completeness of the three-component Green's function decomposition; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math Perturbations around a Schwarzschild black hole obey the Regge-Wheeler equation
Invoked as the governing equation for the Green's function analysis.
domain assumption The Green's function admits an exact decomposition into prompt response, quasinormal modes, and tail
This decomposition is taken as given from recent progress cited in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1284 out tokens · 98780 ms · 2026-05-10T17:06:39.108339+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean, AlexanderDuality.lean, Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean reality_from_one_distinction, alexander_duality_circle_linking, washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Gravitational waves ... decomposed into three principal components: quasinormal modes, tail, and prompt response ... Green's function of the Regge-Wheeler equation ... G_ℓ(u;r′) = G_QNM + G_Tail + prompt arc/branch-cut terms (Eqs. 6-12, Figs. 1-2)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Pole Structure of Kerr Green's Function
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Homogeneous solutions and connection coefficients in the radial Teukolsky equation for Kerr black holes exhibit simple poles at Matsubara frequencies that cancel in the Green's function, along with canceling zero-freq...
Bilinear products and the orthogonality of quasinormal modes on hyperboloidal foliations
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Bilinear products for black hole quasinormal modes on hyperboloidal foliations are divergent due to CPT transformations but can be regularized to define orthogonal modes and excitation coefficients.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Blanchet, Living Rev

L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Rel.5, 3 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0202016

work page arXiv 2002
[2]

Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

J. Abediet al., (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[3]

J. G. Baker, J. R. van Meter, S. T. McWilliams, J. Cen- trella, and B. J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 181101 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612024

work page arXiv 2007
[4]

Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries

A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D75, 124018 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610122 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[5]

Boyle, D

M. Boyle, D. A. Brown, L. E. Kidder, A. H. Mroue, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, G. B. Cook, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev.D76, 124038 (2007), arXiv:0710.0158 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2007
[6]

Campanelli, C

M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, H. Nakano, and Y. Zlo- chower, Phys. Rev. D79, 084010 (2009), arXiv:0808.0713 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[7]

Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors

A. Buonanno, B. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D80, 084043 (2009), arXiv:0907.0700 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[8]

Giesler, M

M. Giesler, M. Isi, M. Scheel, and S. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev.X9, 041060 (2019), arXiv:1903.08284 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[9]

Giesleret al., Phys

M. Giesleret al., Phys. Rev. D111, 084041 (2025), arXiv:2411.11269 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Agnostic black hole spectroscopy: Quasinormal mode content of numer- ical relativity waveforms and limits of validity of linear perturbation theory,

V. Baibhav, M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, W. Del Pozzo, and F. Duque, Phys. Rev. D108, 104020 (2023), arXiv:2302.03050 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

Modeling Ringdown: Beyond the Fundamental Quasi-Normal Modes

L. London, D. Shoemaker, and J. Healy, Phys. Rev. D90, 124032 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 069902 (2016)], arXiv:1404.3197 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[12]

A. K. Mehta, A. Buonanno, R. Cotesta, A. Ghosh, N. Sen- nett, and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. D107, 044020 (2023), arXiv:2203.13937 [gr-qc]. 10

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries

M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D 89, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[14]

T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Stu- rani, and A. Vecchio, Phys. Rev. D85, 082003 (2012), arXiv:1110.0530 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[15]

Parameterized tests of the strong-field dynamics of general relativity using gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary black holes: Fast likelihood calculations and sensitivity of the method

J. Meidamet al., Phys. Rev. D97, 044033 (2018), arXiv:1712.08772 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[16]

Black-hole Spectroscopy by Making Full Use of Gravitational-Wave Modeling

R. Brito, A. Buonanno, and V. Raymond, Phys. Rev. D98, 084038 (2018), arXiv:1805.00293 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[17]

Pompili, E

L. Pompili, E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D111, 124040 (2025), arXiv:2504.10130 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[19]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[20]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2026), arXiv:2603.19020 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[21]

K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D74, 024006 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0604067

work page arXiv 2006
[22]

C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
[23]

Maggio, H

E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, A. Buonanno, and A. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D108, 024043 (2023), arXiv:2212.09655 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

Mitmanet al., Nonlinearities in Black Hole Ringdowns, Phys

K. Mitmanet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 081402 (2023), arXiv:2208.07380 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

M. H.-Y. Cheunget al., Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 081401 (2023), arXiv:2208.07374 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

S. Ma, K. Mitman, L. Sun, N. Deppe, F. Hébert, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, W. Throwe, N. L. Vu, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D106, 084036 (2022), arXiv:2207.10870 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Nonlinear Ringdown at the Black Hole Horizon,

N. Khera, A. Ribes Metidieri, B. Bonga, X. Jiménez Forteza, B. Krishnan, E. Poisson, D. Pook- Kolb, E. Schnetter, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 231401 (2023), arXiv:2306.11142 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[28]

Khera, S

N. Khera, S. Ma, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211404 (2025), arXiv:2410.14529 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Ma and H

S. Ma and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D109, 104070 (2024), arXiv:2401.15516 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Zhuet al., Phys

H. Zhuet al., Phys. Rev. D109, 104050 (2024), arXiv:2401.00805 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Redondo-Yuste, G

J. Redondo-Yuste, G. Carullo, J. L. Ripley, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D109, L101503 (2024), arXiv:2308.14796 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Bucciotti, L

B. Bucciotti, L. Juliano, A. Kuntz, and E. Trincherini, Phys. Rev. D110, 104048 (2024), arXiv:2405.06012 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Bourg, R

P. Bourg, R. Panosso Macedo, A. Spiers, B. Leather, B. Bonga, and A. Pound, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 061401 (2025), arXiv:2405.10270 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Bucciotti, L

B. Bucciotti, L. Juliano, A. Kuntz, and E. Trincherini, JHEP09, 119 (2024), arXiv:2406.14611 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Lagos, T

M. Lagos, T. Andrade, J. Rafecas-Ventosa, and L. Hui, Phys. Rev. D111, 024018 (2025), arXiv:2411.02264 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

S. Yi, A. Kuntz, E. Barausse, E. Berti, M. H.-Y. Cheung, K. Kritos, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D109, 124029 (2024), arXiv:2403.09767 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

Bourg, R

P. Bourg, R. Panosso Macedo, A. Spiers, B. Leather, B. Béatrice, and A. Pound, (2025), arXiv:2503.07432 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

T. May, S. Ma, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Phys. Rev. D110, 084034 (2024), arXiv:2405.18303 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Zhuet al., Phys

H. Zhuet al., Phys. Rev. D110, 124028 (2024), arXiv:2404.12424 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

S. Ma, L. Lehner, H. Yang, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, (2025), arXiv:2508.13294 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Sberna, P

L. Sberna, P. Bosch, W. E. East, S. R. Green, and L. Lehner, Phys. Rev. D105, 064046 (2022), arXiv:2112.11168 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

R. H. Price, Phys. Rev. D5, 2419 (1972)

1972
[43]

R. H. Price, Phys. Rev. D5, 2439 (1972)

1972
[44]

E. W. Leaver, Phys. Rev. D34, 384 (1986)

1986
[45]

Evolving test fields in a black hole ge- ometry,

N. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D55, 468 (1997), arXiv:gr- qc/9607064

work page arXiv 1997
[46]

L. Hui, D. Kabat, and S. S. C. Wong, JCAP12, 020 (2019), arXiv:1909.10382 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[47]

Lagos and L

M. Lagos and L. Hui, Phys. Rev. D107, 044040 (2023), arXiv:2208.07379 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

J. Su, N. Khera, M. Casals, S. Ma, A. Chowdhuri, and H. Yang, (2026), arXiv:2601.22015 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[49]

Post- Minkowskian expansion of the Prompt Response in a Schwarzschild background,

M. De Amicis and E. Cannizzaro, (2026), arXiv:2601.11706 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[50]

Probing Direct Waves in Black Hole Ringdowns,

N. Oshita, S. Ma, Y. Chen, and H. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2509.09165 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

N. Lu, S. Ma, O. J. Piccinni, Y. Chen, and L. Sun, (2025), arXiv:2510.01001 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 141401 (2023), arXiv:2301.06705 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[53]

S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D107, 084010 (2023), arXiv:2301.06639 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[54]

S. T. McWilliams, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 191102 (2019), arXiv:1810.00040 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[55]

Kankani and S

A. Kankani and S. T. McWilliams, (2026), arXiv:2603.15474 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[56]

Kankani and S

A. Kankani and S. T. McWilliams, (2025), arXiv:2510.25012 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 1079 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9603020

work page arXiv 1996
[58]

S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 549 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9605057

work page arXiv 1996
[59]

Rel.6 6 [arXiv:gr-qc/0306120]

M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, Living Rev. Rel.6, 6 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0306120

work page arXiv 2003
[60]

Beyond quasinormal modes: a complete mode decomposition of black hole perturbations,

P. Arnaudo, J. Carballo, and B. Withers, (2025), arXiv:2510.18956 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

P. T. Leung, A. Maassen van den Brink, K. W. Mak, and K. Young, (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0307024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2003
[62]

Casals and A

M. Casals and A. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D86, 024021 (2012), arXiv:1112.2695 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[63]

Casals and A

M. Casals and A. C. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 111101 (2012), arXiv:1205.6592 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[64]

High-order tail in schwarzschild spacetime,

M. Casals and A. C. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D92, 124055 (2015), arXiv:1509.04702 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[65]

Analytic inves- tigation of the branch cut of the green function in schwarzschild space-time,

M. Casals and A. C. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D87, 064010 (2013), arXiv:1210.0519 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[66]

Self-Force and Green Function in Schwarzschild spacetime via Quasinormal Modes and Branch Cut

M. Casals, S. Dolan, A. C. Ottewill, and B. Wardell, Phys. Rev. D88, 044022 (2013), arXiv:1306.0884 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[67]

Chavda, M

A. Chavda, M. Lagos, and L. Hui, JCAP07, 084 (2025), arXiv:2412.03435 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

De Amicis, E

M. De Amicis, E. Cannizzaro, G. Carullo, and L. Sberna, (2025), arXiv:2506.21668 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

S. Ma, M. Giesler, V. Varma, M. A. Scheel, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D104, 084003 (2021), arXiv:2107.04890 [gr- 11 qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[70]

Küchler, G

L. Küchler, G. Compère, and A. Pound, Class. Quant. Grav.43, 015018 (2026), arXiv:2506.02189 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[71]

S. Ma, M. A. Scheel, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024003 (2025), arXiv:2412.06906 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

Ma et al.,Fully relativistic three-dimensional Cauchy-characteristic matching for physical degrees of freedom, Phys

S. Maet al., Phys. Rev. D109, 124027 (2024), arXiv:2308.10361 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024