pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09669 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-01 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.AI· cs.CL· cs.CY· cs.DL· cs.LG

Digital hybridity and relics in cultural heritage: using corpus linguistics to inform design in emerging technologies from AI to VR

Emma McClaughlin , Glenn McGarry , Alan Chamberlain , Geert De Wilde , Oliver Butler This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.DLcs.LG
keywords corpus linguisticsrelicscultural heritagehybrid technologiesdigital representationAIVRethical design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linguistic analysis of the word relic across eras shows perceptions shifting from moral and spiritual significance plus tools of control to heritage symbols, guiding responsible design of hybrid digital technologies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors apply a corpus linguistic method to pull modifiers of the word relic from Early Modern English books and 2021 web texts. Early sources link relics to both spiritual value and instruments of religious or political power, while modern sources frame them mainly as markers of past events, places, and traditions. The paper argues these patterns supply concrete guidance for designing hybrid technologies that blend physical and digital elements, such as AI and VR applications, so they increase access without erasing questions of authenticity and sensory meaning. A sympathetic reader would care because digital representations of culturally loaded objects can either preserve or distort the very qualities that give relics their significance.

Core claim

Corpus analysis of modifiers for the word 'relic' in Early Modern English books and 2021 web texts reveals shifting perceptions: early sources treat relics as objects of moral and spiritual significance and as tools of religious and political control, while contemporary texts frame them as heritage symbols tied to past events and traditions. This linguistic evidence is used to discuss how hybrid technologies such as AI and VR can enhance accessibility and engagement with relics while respecting challenges around authenticity and sensory experience.

What carries the argument

Corpus extraction and comparison of modifiers attached to the word relic in historical and contemporary text collections, which tracks shifts in cultural evaluation and supplies a linguistic basis for technology design choices.

Load-bearing premise

That patterns of word modifiers in the selected historical and web corpora directly reflect broader cultural perceptions of relics and supply reliable guidance for responsible technology design.

What would settle it

A controlled study in which participants interact with AI or VR relic representations designed with and without the linguistic modifier patterns and show no measurable differences in ratings of authenticity, respect, or engagement.

read the original abstract

Hybrid technologies enable the blending of physical and digital elements, creating new ways to experience and interact with the world. Such technologies can transform engagement with relics, both secular and sacred but they present challenges for capturing faith, belief, and representation responsibly. Given the complexities of digital representation and the ethical challenges inherent in digitising culturally significant objects, a transdisciplinary understanding of these issues is needed. To inform this discussion from a linguistic perspective, we examined the representation of relics in historical and contemporary texts. Using a corpus linguistic approach to extract modifiers of the word relic in corpora of Early Modern English books and contemporary web sourced texts from 2021, we examined the multifaceted ways in which relics have been perceived and evaluated over time. Early texts consider relics as both objects of moral and spiritual significance, and tools of religious and political control, while they are more often framed as heritage symbols, reflecting past events, places, and traditions in contemporary texts. We discuss how hybrid, sometimes AI based technologies can enhance accessibility and engagement, whilst also challenging traditional sensitivities around authenticity and sensory experience, which are integral to the meaning and significance of relics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a corpus-linguistic analysis of modifiers attached to the word 'relic' in Early Modern English book corpora versus 2021 web texts reveals a historical shift from portrayals of relics as objects of moral/spiritual significance and instruments of religious/political control to contemporary framings as heritage symbols. These patterns are then invoked to derive guidance for responsible design of hybrid, AI, and VR technologies that must balance accessibility, authenticity, and sensory experience when representing cultural heritage objects.

Significance. If the central mapping from modifier patterns to cultural perceptions and onward to concrete design constraints can be substantiated, the work would offer a distinctive transdisciplinary contribution at the intersection of historical linguistics and HCI, supplying an evidence-based historical lens for ethical guidelines on digital representation of sacred or contested artifacts.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: no corpus sizes, selection criteria, or composition details (word counts, text sources, sampling frames) are supplied for either the Early Modern English collection or the 2021 web corpus, preventing any assessment of whether the extracted modifiers are representative or comparable across eras.
  2. [Results] Results section: the paper reports no quantitative comparison (log-likelihood, chi-square, or normalized frequency ratios) between modifier sets in the two corpora, so the claimed diachronic shift from 'moral/spiritual' to 'heritage symbol' framings rests on untested qualitative impressions rather than statistical evidence.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion section: the interpretive step that treats modifier lists as direct proxies for broader cultural perceptions, followed by the prescriptive leap to specific AI/VR design recommendations (authenticity, sensory experience), lacks reported inter-annotator agreement, external triangulation, or validation against primary historical sources or contemporary surveys.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'contemporary web sourced texts from 2021' should specify the exact provenance (e.g., news archive, Common Crawl subset) to allow readers to gauge scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have revised the manuscript to address the concerns about methodological transparency, quantitative support, and interpretive grounding. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: no corpus sizes, selection criteria, or composition details (word counts, text sources, sampling frames) are supplied for either the Early Modern English collection or the 2021 web corpus, preventing any assessment of whether the extracted modifiers are representative or comparable across eras.

    Authors: We agree that these details are essential for evaluating the study. We have expanded the Methods section to report corpus sizes (word counts), selection criteria (date ranges, text types, relevance filters), composition (specific sources such as EEBO-TCP for Early Modern English and web sampling procedures for 2021 texts), and sampling frames. These additions now enable assessment of representativeness and cross-era comparability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: the paper reports no quantitative comparison (log-likelihood, chi-square, or normalized frequency ratios) between modifier sets in the two corpora, so the claimed diachronic shift from 'moral/spiritual' to 'heritage symbol' framings rests on untested qualitative impressions rather than statistical evidence.

    Authors: We accept this critique and have added quantitative analyses to the Results section. Normalized frequencies and chi-square tests comparing modifier categories (moral/spiritual vs. heritage-related) across corpora are now included, confirming the diachronic shift with statistical support. These metrics are presented alongside the qualitative examples. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion section: the interpretive step that treats modifier lists as direct proxies for broader cultural perceptions, followed by the prescriptive leap to specific AI/VR design recommendations (authenticity, sensory experience), lacks reported inter-annotator agreement, external triangulation, or validation against primary historical sources or contemporary surveys.

    Authors: We have revised the Discussion to include additional close readings of primary historical texts for triangulation and explicit citations to supporting historical scholarship. The design recommendations are now framed as exploratory hypotheses derived from the linguistic patterns, with clearer limitations and calls for future empirical validation. New inter-annotator agreement or contemporary surveys were not conducted in this revision, as they would require separate data collection. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • New empirical validation requiring fresh data collection, such as formal inter-annotator agreement studies or contemporary user surveys on cultural perceptions of relics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external corpora and interpretive mapping without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper extracts modifiers of 'relic' from two external corpora (Early Modern English books and 2021 web texts), interprets historical vs. contemporary perceptions, and discusses implications for hybrid/AI/VR design. No equations or parameters are fitted and then renamed as predictions; no self-citations serve as load-bearing premises; no ansatz or uniqueness theorems are imported from prior author work. The chain from token extraction to design recommendations does not reduce to the inputs by construction. Any limitations (e.g., lack of statistical comparison or external validation) concern generalizability and evidence strength, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that linguistic patterns in selected corpora capture authentic historical and contemporary perceptions without significant selection bias or anachronism.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The chosen Early Modern English books and 2021 web texts are representative samples of how relics were perceived in their respective periods.
    Invoked when interpreting modifier patterns as evidence of broader cultural views.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5529 in / 1233 out tokens · 39701 ms · 2026-05-13T21:44:34.951024+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

10 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bagnoli, Klein, Mann & Robinson. (2011). Treasures of Heaven: Saints, Relics and Devotion in Medieval Europe. British Museum. Available at: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIB9326 Baker, P . (2011). Times may change, but we will always have money: Diachronic variation in recent British English. Journal of English Linguistics, 39(1), 65-88. B...

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction

    https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2024.2423613 Benjamin, W. (2019). "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction". In Watson, S., Barnes, A. J., & Bunning, K. (Eds.). A museum studies approach to heritage. Routledge: London and New York. Brundell, P . R., Harlow, N., Cameron, H., & Bowden, W. (2022, November). Rome is where the heart is: Designin...

    work page doi:10.1080/09298215.2024.2423613 2024

  3. [3]

    Digital Transformation —the Silver Bullet to Public Service Improvement?

    “Digital Transformation —the Silver Bullet to Public Service Improvement?” Public Money & Management 39 (5): 322–324. De Wilde, G., Rothwell, W., Trotter, D. (1995 -present). Anglo -Norman Dictionary, Second Edition, https://anglo-norman.net/ Accessed 4th November

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    Eisenhart, C., & Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis and rhetorical studies (pp. 3-21). In Johnstone, B., & Eisenhart, C. (Eds.). Rhetoric in detail: Discourse analyses of rhetorical talk and text (Vol. 31). John Benjamins Publishing. Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power. Routledge. Ford, C., Wilson, E., Zheng, S., Vigliensoni, G., Rezwana, J., ...

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Crea tivity and Cognition (C&C '25)

    Explainable AI for the Arts 3 (XAIxArts3). In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Crea tivity and Cognition (C&C '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3728392 Hahn, C. (2010). What do reliquaries do for relics?. Numen, 57(3 -4), 284 -316. DOI: 10.1163/156852710X501324 Jakubíček, M., Kilgarr...

    work page doi:10.1145/3698061.3728392 2025

  6. [6]

    Montgomery, S. B. (1997). Mittite capud meum... ad matrem meam ut osculetur eum: The Form and Meaning of the Reliquary Bust of Saint Just. Gesta, 36(1), 48-64. DOI: 10.2307/767278 Pietroni, E., Pagano, A., & Rufa, C. (2013, October). The Etruscanning project: Gesture -based interaction and user experience in the virtual reconstruction of the Regolini-Gala...

    work page doi:10.2307/767278 1997

  7. [7]

    Piskopani, A.M., Chamberlain, Al., and Ten Holter, C

    https://doi.org/10.3390/asi2040035. Piskopani, A.M., Chamberlain, Al., and Ten Holter, C. (2023). Responsible AI and the Arts: The Ethical and Legal Implications of AI in the Arts and Creative Industries. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems ( TAS '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , US...

    work page doi:10.3390/asi2040035 2023

  8. [8]

    relics in the church: authenticity and preservation

    Turner, V. W., & Turner, E. L. (2011). Image and pilgrimage in Christian culture. Columbia University Press. ISBN 10: 0231157916 Vatican, The (2017) ‘Instruction “relics in the church: authenticity and preservation”’. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/csaints/documents/rc_con_csaints_doc_201712 08_istruzione-reliquie_en.html. Accessed 31st October

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    A., Mastrofini, F., & Di Pietro, F

    Vitullo, A., Campbell, H. A., Mastrofini, F., & Di Pietro, F. P . (2025). From Radio to AI. Old and new trends in the Catholic Church’s approach to technological innovation. Church, Communication and Culture, 10(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2025.2474812 Wagg, D., Burr, C., Shepherd, J., Xuereb Conti, Z., Enzer, M., & Niederer, S. (2024). Th...

    work page doi:10.1080/23753234.2025.2474812 2025

  10. [10]

    DOI: 10.3390/su13042046 Woycicki, P ., Chamberlain, A., & Borokini, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and contemporary performance: developing an arts & humanities approach to AI. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 21(2), 227 –239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2025.2552603 Yorkshire Sculpture Park. (2024). Exhibitions. ...

    work page doi:10.3390/su13042046 2025