arxiv: 2604.11888 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Rotating Thin Shells in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

Jo\~ao D. \'Alvares , Tiago V. Fernandes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th

keywords thin shellsrotating metricsEinstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravityjunction conditionsvacuum shellsnaked singularitiesChern-Simons point

0 comments

The pith

Rotating thin shells in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity are restricted to vacuum shells or those with pressure in only one tangential direction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs rotating thin shells by gluing two copies of a rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metric solution at the Chern-Simons point, with the inner and outer regions differing in mass and angular momentum. Using the Davis junction conditions, the allowed stress-energy tensors on the shell are found to be either fully vacuum or to have pressure in exactly one tangential direction with all other components zero. The resulting equation of motion for the shell's radius resembles the continuity equation known from general relativity, although the effective mass parameter remains independent of the stress tensor. Analysis of the vacuum case yields explicit trajectories, some of which terminate in naked singularities, along with two classes of static solutions distinguished by their stability properties.

Core claim

We construct a rotating thin shell gluing two spacetimes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, using the Davis junction conditions. We take the inner and outer spacetimes as replicas of the same rotating metric, with different values of mass and angular momentum. We show that the only possible thin shells either are vacuum thin shells or have a non-zero pressure in one tangential direction while the remaining stress tensor components vanish. We obtain the equation of motion for the shell, which resembles the continuity equation for a shell in General Relativity (GR), even though the quantity analogous to the intrinsic mass of the shell in GR is not connected to its stress tensor. We study the特殊案

What carries the argument

Davis junction conditions applied to match the rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metric at the Chern-Simons point across a thin shell surface.

If this is right

For vacuum thin shells connecting zero-hair spacetimes, trajectories can be obtained analytically and in some cases the shell collapses to form a naked singularity.
Stable static vacuum thin shells exist when both the inner and outer spacetimes are overextremal.
Unstable static vacuum thin shells exist when the horizons of the inner and outer spacetimes approach each other near extremality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The decoupling between the shell's effective mass and its stress tensor may produce thermodynamic relations different from those in general relativity.
The same junction construction could be repeated with other higher-curvature gravity models that admit similar rotating solutions.

Load-bearing premise

The inner and outer regions are described by the same rotating metric form, differing only in the values of mass and angular momentum, so that the Davis junction conditions can be applied directly.

What would settle it

An explicit thin-shell solution with nonzero pressure in both tangential directions that still satisfies the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet field equations and the junction conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11888 by Jo\~ao D. \'Alvares, Tiago V. Fernandes.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Formation of naked singularity with a negative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Plots depicting the radius of the thin shell as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Examples of the behaviors described by Eqs. (40) (top left), (41) (top right), (42) (bottom right), and (43) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Unstable static shell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Stable static shell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

A rotating metric solution in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a negative cosmological constant was recently found in the Chern-Simons point. We construct a rotating thin shell gluing two spacetimes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, using the Davis junction conditions. We take the inner and outer spacetimes as replicas of the same rotating metric, with different values of mass and angular momentum. We show that the only possible thin shells either are vacuum thin shells or have a non-zero pressure in one tangential direction while the remaining stress tensor components vanish. We obtain the equation of motion for the shell, which resembles the continuity equation for a shell in General Relativity (GR), even though the quantity analogous to the intrinsic mass of the shell in GR is not connected to its stress tensor. We study the special case of vacuum thin shells connecting two spacetimes with zero hair. We obtain analytically the possible trajectories of the shell, and in certain situations we observe that the solution ceases to be valid. We find cases where the vacuum shell collapses and a naked singularity is formed. There two types of static vacuum thin shell solutions, one being stable occurring when both inner and outer spacetimes are overextremal, and the other unstable occurring when the horizons of inner and outer spacetimes approach each other, and are close to extremality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives explicit analytic classifications of rotating vacuum thin shells in EGB at the Chern-Simons point, including naked-singularity cases, but the junction conditions may need extra GB surface terms.

read the letter

The key takeaway is that this paper builds rotating thin shells in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity at the Chern-Simons point by matching two versions of a known rotating metric with different mass and spin. It finds that the surface stress tensor must be either vacuum or have pressure in only one direction, derives a motion equation that mimics the GR continuity equation without tying mass to stress, and then classifies the vacuum shell trajectories analytically, including collapses to naked singularities and stable static cases when both sides are overextremal. The analytic work on the vacuum trajectories is the strongest part. They get explicit conditions for when the shell collapses or stays static, and link stability to the extremality of the inner and outer metrics. That gives concrete, checkable results. The construction itself applies standard thin-shell techniques to this EGB metric, so the new elements are the specific stress-tensor restrictions and the trajectory catalog rather than a broad new method. It does a solid job showing how the equation of motion decouples from the stress in this setup. The main soft spot is the junction conditions. The stress-test note points out that in Lovelock theories like EGB, thin-shell junctions can pick up extra contributions from the Gauss-Bonnet term. The paper uses the Davis conditions directly and assumes the metric form holds across the shell without those extras. If the additional terms are nonzero, the allowed stress tensors would change and the only possible thin shells claim would need revision. The abstract gives no derivations, so the full paper needs to show explicitly that those GB corrections vanish or are accounted for. If they did that, the results hold; otherwise it's a gap. This paper is for people working on exact solutions and thin shells in modified gravity. It could interest those testing cosmic censorship with dynamical shells. The analytic results make it worth a referee's time, though the junction issue should be clarified in review. I recommend sending it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs rotating thin shells in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity at the Chern-Simons point by gluing two replicas of a recently found rotating metric solution (with differing mass and angular momentum parameters) using the Davis junction conditions. It claims that the only admissible thin shells are vacuum shells or those with non-zero pressure in exactly one tangential direction (all other stress-tensor components vanishing). An equation of motion for the shell is derived that formally resembles the GR continuity equation, even though the effective mass-like quantity is decoupled from the surface stress tensor. For the vacuum case the paper obtains analytic trajectories, identifies collapse to naked singularities, and classifies two families of static solutions (stable when both sides are over-extremal; unstable when horizons approach each other near extremality).

Significance. If the junction conditions are correctly applied, the work supplies a concrete extension of the thin-shell formalism to rotating solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and isolates a structural difference from GR (decoupling of the mass-like quantity from the stress tensor). The explicit analytic treatment of vacuum-shell trajectories, including concrete examples of collapse and stable static configurations, is a clear strength that furnishes falsifiable predictions for further study. The construction rests on an external metric solution and the standard Davis conditions, which keeps the number of free parameters minimal.

major comments (2)

[Junction conditions and stress-tensor derivation] Section applying the Davis junction conditions: The algebraic constraints that restrict the surface stress tensor to vacuum or single-component pressure forms are obtained solely from the jump in extrinsic curvature via the Davis relations. In Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (Lovelock) gravity the complete thin-shell junction conditions contain additional surface terms proportional to the jump in the Gauss-Bonnet curvature invariants. The manuscript does not derive or demonstrate that these GB contributions vanish identically at the Chern-Simons point; if they do not, the allowed stress-tensor structures and the subsequent equation of motion would be modified. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that “the only possible thin shells” are of the reported types.
[Equation of motion for the shell] Equation-of-motion derivation: The statement that the shell equation “resembles the continuity equation for a shell in GR” is presented without an explicit side-by-side comparison or derivation that isolates the origin of the resemblance once the mass-stress decoupling is taken into account. Because this resemblance is used to interpret the dynamics, an expanded derivation (including the precise definition of the effective mass-like quantity) is required to substantiate the analogy.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the sentence “There two types of static vacuum thin shell solutions” contains a grammatical error and should read “There are two types…”
[Introduction and metric setup] The rotating metric solution is described as “recently found”; the explicit citation to that work should appear in the introduction and in the construction section for completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major points below and will revise the manuscript to include the requested derivations and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Section applying the Davis junction conditions: The algebraic constraints that restrict the surface stress tensor to vacuum or single-component pressure forms are obtained solely from the jump in extrinsic curvature via the Davis relations. In Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (Lovelock) gravity the complete thin-shell junction conditions contain additional surface terms proportional to the jump in the Gauss-Bonnet curvature invariants. The manuscript does not derive or demonstrate that these GB contributions vanish identically at the Chern-Simons point; if they do not, the allowed stress-tensor structures and the subsequent equation of motion would be modified. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that “the only possible thin shells” are of the reported types.

Authors: We acknowledge that the full junction conditions in EGB gravity include additional contributions from the Gauss-Bonnet term. At the Chern-Simons point the theory possesses a special structure, but the manuscript does not explicitly verify the vanishing of these terms. We will add a dedicated calculation in the revised manuscript showing that the GB surface terms vanish identically for the rotating metrics under consideration, thereby confirming that the Davis conditions are sufficient and the reported stress-tensor restrictions remain valid. revision: yes
Referee: Equation-of-motion derivation: The statement that the shell equation “resembles the continuity equation for a shell in GR” is presented without an explicit side-by-side comparison or derivation that isolates the origin of the resemblance once the mass-stress decoupling is taken into account. Because this resemblance is used to interpret the dynamics, an expanded derivation (including the precise definition of the effective mass-like quantity) is required to substantiate the analogy.

Authors: We agree that the analogy requires a more explicit derivation. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section with a step-by-step derivation of the shell equation from the junction conditions, provide the precise definition of the effective mass-like quantity (highlighting its decoupling from the surface stress tensor), and include a direct side-by-side comparison with the GR continuity equation to clarify the origin and limitations of the resemblance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the allowed stress-tensor structures and shell equation of motion by direct application of the external Davis junction conditions to the jump in extrinsic curvature between two copies of a previously published rotating metric solution. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no central premise reduces to a self-citation whose validity is assumed inside the paper, and the resemblance to the GR continuity equation is an output of the calculation rather than an input. The construction remains self-contained once the metric form and junction conditions are granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet action with negative cosmological constant evaluated at the Chern-Simons point, the existence of the recently found rotating metric solution, and the applicability of Davis junction conditions to glue the spacetimes. No free parameters are introduced beyond the metric mass and angular momentum; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Davis junction conditions remain valid for thin shells in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity
The entire construction uses these conditions to obtain the shell stress tensor and equation of motion.
domain assumption The rotating metric solution found at the Chern-Simons point can be used as both inner and outer spacetime with independent mass and angular momentum parameters
Paper explicitly states that inner and outer regions are replicas of this metric with different parameter values.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1584 out tokens · 43531 ms · 2026-05-10T15:17:04.957831+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

We define the AdS length in five dimensions as l2 =−3Λ,(7) and so the Gauss-Bonnet coefficient is given by α= l2 4 .(8) This relation betweenαandΛholds specifically only for d= 5dimensions [23]. B. Rotating solution The black hole rotating solution in CS EGB AdS grav- ity found in [33] has a metric ds2 =l 2 cosh2(ρ) −A(r)dt2 + dr2 A(r) +r 2(dψ+N ψdt)2 +l ...
[2]

s p |Q4| 4|m|k (τ+κ) # ,∆>0, (40) R= vuut− Q2 2|Q4| +kexp

Dynamic solutions When bothb ± = 0, there are several analytic solutions that Eq. (34) can take, depending on the initial data. Writing Eq. (34) explicitly, as a function of the following quantities, Q0 =(j2 − −j 2 +)2 + 8m2(2m2 −(j 2 + +j 2 −)) Q2 =8 (j2 + −j 2 −)(M− −M +) + 4m2(M− +M +) Q4 =16(4m2 −(M − −M +)2), (37) we get ˙R=± p Q0 +Q 2R2 −Q 4R4 8mR ,...
[3]

Analytical

Static solutions In addition to the dynamical solutions, there are also staticsolutionsforthevacuumshell, whichareillustrated in Fig. 1. These solutions occur when˙R= 0and ¨R= 0, which in the phase space are represented by the apex of the parabola,R= q Q2 2Q4 , for∆ = 0. It can be shown that indeed these two conditions together are consistent withp R = 0,...

work page arXiv 2024
[4]

H.Weyl,Gravitationandelectricity,Sitzungsber.Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1918, 465 (1918)

1918
[5]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982)

1982
[6]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Effective Field Theory from Quantized Strings, Phys. Lett. B158, 316 (1985)

1985
[7]

D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, String-Generated Gravity Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2656 (1985)

1985
[8]

C. G. Callan, Jr., I. R. Klebanov, and M. J. Perry, String Theory Effective Actions, Nucl. Phys. B278, 78 (1986)

1986
[9]

D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String, Nucl. Phys. B291, 41 (1987)

1987
[10]

M. C. Bento and O. Bertolami, Maximally Symmetric Cosmological Solutions of higher curvature string effec- tivetheorieswithdilatons,Phys.Lett.B368,198(1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9503057

work page arXiv 1996
[11]

Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J

D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J. Math. Phys.12, 498 (1971)

1971
[12]

P. Wang, H. Wu, H. Yang, and S. Ying, Derive Lovelock GravityfromStringTheoryinCosmologicalBackground, JHEP05, 218, arXiv:2012.13312 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2012
[13]

Garraffo and G

C. Garraffo and G. Giribet, The Lovelock Black Holes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A23, 1801 (2008), arXiv:0805.3575 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[14]

Troncoso and J

R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli, Chern-Simons supergravi- ties with off-shell local superalgebras, in6th Conference on Quantum Mechanics of Fundamental Systems: Black Holes and the Structure of the Universe(1997) pp. 119– 145, arXiv:hep-th/9902003

work page arXiv 1997
[15]

Troncoso and J

R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli, Higher dimensional gravity, propagating torsion and AdS gauge invariance, Class. Quant. Grav.17, 4451 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9907109

work page arXiv 2000
[16]

Troncoso and J

R. Troncoso and J. Zanelli, Gauge supergravities for all odd dimensions, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38, 1181 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9807029

work page arXiv 1999
[17]

J. M. Maldacena, The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998
[18]

Zanelli, Lecture notes on Chern-Simons (super- )gravities

J. Zanelli, Lecture notes on Chern-Simons (super- )gravities. Second edition (February 2008), in7th Mexi- can Workshop on Particles and Fields(2005) arXiv:hep- th/0502193

work page arXiv 2008
[19]

Cai, Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes in AdS Spaces, Phys

R.-G. Cai, Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes in AdS Spaces, Phys. Rev. D65, 084014 (2002), arXiv:0109133 [hep-th]

2002
[20]

M. H. Dehghani, Charged rotating black branes in anti- de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 67, 064017 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0211191

work page arXiv 2003
[21]

M. H. Dehghani, Magnetic branes in Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D69, 064024 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0312030

work page arXiv 2004
[22]

J. P. S. Lemos and V. T. Zanchin, Rotating charged black string and three-dimensional black holes, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3840 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9511188

work page arXiv 1996
[23]

A. M. Awad, Higher dimensional charged rotating solu- tions in (A)dS space-times, Class. Quant. Grav.20, 2827 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0209238

work page arXiv 2003
[24]

Kim and R.-G

H.-C. Kim and R.-G. Cai, Slowly Rotating Charged Gauss-Bonnet Black holes in AdS Spaces, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024045 (2008), arXiv:0711.0885 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[25]

Brihaye and E

Y. Brihaye and E. Radu, Five-dimensional rotating black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory, Phys. Lett. B 661, 167 (2008), arXiv:0801.1021 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[26]

Anabalon, N

A. Anabalon, N. Deruelle, Y. Morisawa, J. Oliva, M. Sasaki, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, Kerr-Schild ansatz in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: An exact vac- uum solution in five dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 065002 (2009), arXiv:0812.3194 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2009
[27]

Banados, C

M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Dimension- ally continued black holes, Phys. Rev. D49, 975 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9307033

work page arXiv 1994
[28]

Cai and K.-S

R.-G. Cai and K.-S. Soh, Topological black holes in the dimensionallycontinuedgravity,Phys.Rev.D59,044013 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9808067

work page arXiv 1999
[29]

R. Aros, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Black holes with topologically nontrivial AdS asymptotics, Phys. Rev. D 63, 084015 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0011097. 12

work page arXiv 2001
[30]

Crisostomo, R

J. Crisostomo, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Black hole scan, Phys. Rev. D62, 084013 (2000), arXiv:hep- th/0003271

work page arXiv 2000
[31]

Dotti, J

G. Dotti, J. Oliva, and R. Troncoso, Static wormhole solution for higher-dimensional gravity in vacuum, Phys. Rev. D75, 024002 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0607062

work page arXiv 2007
[32]

Dotti, J

G. Dotti, J. Oliva, and R. Troncoso, Exact solutions for the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory in five dimensions: Black holes, wormholes and spacetime horns, Phys. Rev. D76, 064038 (2007), arXiv:0706.1830 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2007
[33]

Giribet, N

G. Giribet, N. Merino, O. Miskovic, and J. Zanelli, Black hole solutions in Chern-Simons AdS supergravity, JHEP 08, 083, arXiv:1406.3096 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[34]

Brihaye and E

Y. Brihaye and E. Radu, Black hole solutions in d=5 Chern-Simons gravity, JHEP11, 049, arXiv:1305.3531 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[35]

Kleihaus, J

B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and E. Radu, Phases of Rotating Black Objects in d = 5 Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Theory, Universe9, 156 (2023), arXiv:2303.12471 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

Anabalon, D

A. Anabalon, D. Astefanesei, A. Cisterna, F. Izau- rieta, J. Oliva, C. Quijada, and C. Quinzacara, Ro- tating and accelerating AdS black holes in Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Lett. B857, 139000 (2024), arXiv:2404.04691 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

The Black Hole in Three Dimensional Space Time

M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9204099

work page Pith review arXiv 1992
[38]

Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cim

W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cim. B44S10, 1 (1966)

1966
[39]

Darmois, Les équations de la gravitation einsteini- enne, MSM25(1927)

G. Darmois, Les équations de la gravitation einsteini- enne, MSM25(1927)

1927
[40]

Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

E. Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

2009
[41]

Hayward and J

G. Hayward and J. Louko, Variational principles for non- smooth metrics, Phys. Rev. D42, 4032 (1990)

1990
[42]

Hajicek and J

P. Hajicek and J. Kijowski, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism for discontinuous fluid and gravitational field, Phys. Rev. D57, 914 (1998), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 61, 129901 (2000)], arXiv:gr-qc/9707020

work page arXiv 1998
[43]

Israel, Gravitational Collapse and Causality, Phys

W. Israel, Gravitational Collapse and Causality, Phys. Rev.153, 1388 (1967)

1967
[44]

Kuchař, Charged shells in general relativity and their gravitational collapse, Czech

K. Kuchař, Charged shells in general relativity and their gravitational collapse, Czech. J. Phys. B18, 435 (1968)

1968
[45]

Delsate, J

T. Delsate, J. V. Rocha, and R. Santarelli, Collapsing thinshellswithrotation,Phys.Rev.D89,121501(2014), arXiv:1405.1433 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[46]

P. R. Brady, J. Louko, and E. Poisson, Stability of a shell around a black hole, Phys. Rev. D44, 1891 (1991)

1991
[47]

Bejarano and E

C. Bejarano and E. F. Eiroa, Dilaton thin-shell worm- holes supported by a generalized Chaplygin gas, Phys. Rev. D84, 064043 (2011), arXiv:1106.6340 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[48]

Katz and D

J. Katz and D. Lynden-Bell, Tension shells and tension stars, Classical and Quantum Gravity8, 2231 (1991)

1991
[49]

J. P. S. Lemos and P. Luz, All fundamental electri- cally charged thin shells in general relativity: From star shells to tension shell black holes, regular black holes, and beyond, Phys. Rev. D103, 104046 (2021), arXiv:2103.15832 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

R. C. Myers, Higher Derivative Gravity, Surface Terms and String Theory, Phys. Rev. D36, 392 (1987)

1987
[51]

S. C. Davis, Generalized Israel junction conditions for a Gauss-Bonnet brane world, Phys. Rev. D67, 024030 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0208205

work page arXiv 2003
[52]

M. A. Ramirez and C. Martínez, Junction conditions for higher order gravity theories from a Gibbons-Hawking- York boundary term, Phys. Rev. D112, 024007 (2025), arXiv:2412.21167 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

Reina, J

B. Reina, J. M. M. Senovilla, and R. Vera, Junction con- ditionsinquadraticgravity: thinshellsanddoublelayers, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 105008 (2016), arXiv:1510.05515 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[54]

J. M. M. Senovilla, Junction Conditions for General Gravitational Theories (2026), arXiv:2603.04645 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[55]

Chu and H

C.-S. Chu and H. S. Tan, Generalized Darmois–Israel Junction Conditions, Universe8, 250 (2022), arXiv:2103.06314 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

A. Ilha, A. Kleber, and J. P. S. Lemos, Dimensionally continued Oppenheimer-Snyder gravitational collapse. 2. Solutions in odd dimensions, J. Math. Phys.40, 3509 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9902054

work page arXiv 1999
[57]

B. P. Brassel, S. D. Maharaj, and R. Goswami, Stars and junction conditions in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet grav- ity, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 125004 (2023)

2023
[58]

G. A. S. Dias, S. Gao, and J. P. S. Lemos, Charged thin shells in Lovelock gravity: Hamiltonian treatment and physical implications, Phys. Rev. D75, 024030 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612072

work page arXiv 2007
[59]

Crisostomo, S

J. Crisostomo, S. del Campo, and J. Saavedra, Hamil- tonian treatment of collapsing thin shells in Lanczos- Lovelock’s theories, Phys. Rev. D70, 064034 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0311259

work page arXiv 2004
[60]

Huang, Y

Y.-M. Huang, Y. Tian, and X.-N. Wu, Collapsing dust thin shells in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 183 (2022), arXiv:2109.08921 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[61]

E. F. Eiroa, E. R. de Celis, and C. Simeone, Tides and energy conditions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet thin-shell wormholes, Universe11, 368 (2025), arXiv:2511.15001 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Liu, Vacuum transitions with the Gauss-Bonnet term in D dimensions, Phys

Y. Liu, Vacuum transitions with the Gauss-Bonnet term in D dimensions, Phys. Rev. D111, 044012 (2025), arXiv:2406.19451 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Chahboun, R

O. Chahboun, R. A. Laamara, and E. H. Saidi, Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet dark matter halo: negative masses, rota- tion curves and the origin of dark matter effects, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 135016 (2024)

2024
[64]

Gravanis and S

E. Gravanis and S. Willison, ‘Mass without mass’ from thin shells in Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D75, 084025 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0701152

work page arXiv 2007
[65]

Garraffo, G

C. Garraffo, G. Giribet, E. Gravanis, and S. Willison, Gravitational solitons and C0 vacuum metrics in five- dimensional Lovelock gravity, J. Math. Phys.49, 042502 (2008), arXiv:0711.2992 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[66]

M. A. Ramirez, Vacuum thin shells in Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet brane-world cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 085004 (2018), arXiv:1709.05577 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[67]

M. A. Ramirez, Thermodynamic Instability of Split- ting Thin Shell Solutions in Braneworld Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet Gravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.63, 116 (2024), arXiv:2012.15852 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

1964–1966, arxiv:1001.3096

C.Garrafo, G.Giribet, E.Gravanis,andS.Willison,Vac- uum thin shell solutions in five dimensional lovelock grav- ity,inThe Twelfth Marcel Grossmann Meeting(2010)pp. 1964–1966, arxiv:1001.3096

work page arXiv 2010
[69]

R. B. Mann, J. J. Oh, and M.-I. Park, Role of angular momentum and cosmic censorship in(2 + 1)-dimensional rotating shell collapse, Phys. Rev. D79, 064005 (2009), 13 arxiv:0812.2297

work page arXiv 2009
[70]

Nozawa and H

M. Nozawa and H. Maeda, Effects of lovelock terms on the final fate of gravitational collapse: Analysis in dimen- sionally continued gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 1779 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0510070

work page arXiv 2006