pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12535 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat

Recognition: unknown

Neutrinoless double-beta decay of the Delta^- resonance

Li-Ping He , Feng-Kun Guo , Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner , De-Liang Yao , Xiao-Yu Zhang , Zhen-Hua Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-lat
keywords neutrinoless double beta decayDelta resonancechiral effective field theoryMajorana neutrinolattice QCDpion mass dependencenuclear matrix elements
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chiral effective field theory derives the neutrinoless double-beta decay amplitude of the Delta-minus resonance from light Majorana neutrino exchange.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper takes a first step toward including the Delta resonance in calculations of nuclear neutrinoless double-beta decay by studying the subprocess Delta-minus to proton plus two electrons. It derives the long-range part of the amplitude from light-Majorana-neutrino exchange through loop diagrams in chiral effective field theory and adds the short-range part via renormalization counterterms. The calculation yields the pion-mass dependence of the amplitude when the two electrons are collinear, plus a simplified long-range form in the limit where the Delta and nucleon masses coincide. A reader would care because this subprocess can enhance the nuclear rate, which is central to interpreting experiments that seek to determine whether neutrinos are Majorana particles.

Core claim

In chiral effective field theory with explicit Delta degrees of freedom, the long-range contribution to Delta-minus to proton electron electron arises from light Majorana neutrino exchange through loop diagrams, while short-range physics is absorbed into local counterterms. The pion-mass dependence is predicted for the collinear-electron kinematics, and the amplitude is evaluated in the degenerate Delta-nucleon mass limit to enable direct lattice-QCD matching.

What carries the argument

Loop diagrams in chiral EFT that generate the long-range light-Majorana-neutrino-exchange contribution to the Delta-minus to proton electron electron transition amplitude

If this is right

  • The predicted pion-mass dependence supplies a functional form that can be used to extrapolate lattice results to the physical pion mass.
  • The degenerate-mass expression provides a concrete benchmark that lattice calculations can match directly.
  • The counterterms introduced for renormalization can be constrained by other processes involving the Delta or by additional lattice data.
  • This Delta contribution can be inserted into larger nuclear matrix-element calculations for neutrinoless double-beta decay.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Delta channel proves numerically important, it would shift the nuclear matrix elements used to convert experimental half-life limits into neutrino-mass bounds.
  • The same loop-plus-counterterm pattern could be applied to other low-energy transitions that involve both Delta resonances and Majorana neutrinos.
  • Matching the short-range counterterms to lattice data would test whether the assumed separation of long- and short-range physics holds at the expected accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

The chiral EFT power counting remains valid when the Delta is kept as an explicit degree of freedom and all short-range physics can be absorbed into local counterterms without extra long-range pieces from heavier particles.

What would settle it

A lattice-QCD evaluation of the Delta-minus to proton electron electron amplitude in the degenerate mass limit that differs numerically from the predicted long-range expression would falsify the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12535 by De-Liang Yao, Feng-Kun Guo, Li-Ping He, Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner, Xiao-Yu Zhang, Zhen-Hua Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of intermediate ∆ contribution to the 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. One-loop Feynman diagrams contributing to the 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Feynman diagram for the counterterm of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Kinematically allowed region of the ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Pion mass dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Pion mass dependence of the real part of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Pion mass dependence of the real (left) and imaginary (right) parts of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Pion mass dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Pion mass dependence of the triangle-singularity condition for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Pion mass dependence of the long-range contribution to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The subprocess $nn\to ppe^-e^-$ is a key ingredient in the interpretation of nuclear neutrinoless double-beta decay. Intermediate $\Delta$ resonances may provide additional enhancements to this transition. We take a first step toward a $\Delta$-full description of $nn\to ppe^-e^-$ by investigating the neutrinoless double-beta decay $\Delta^- \to p e^-e^-$ in the framework of chiral effective field theory. We systematically derive the long-range contribution from light-Majorana-neutrino exchange through loop diagrams and incorporate the short-range part through counterterms required by renormalization. We predict the pion-mass dependence of the decay amplitude in the kinematic configuration with collinear electrons. Furthermore, to facilitate lattice-QCD matching, we calculate the decay amplitude in the degenerate $\Delta$-nucleon mass limit and provide the corresponding long-range prediction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the neutrinoless double-beta decay process Δ⁻ → p e⁻ e⁻ in chiral effective field theory as a first step toward a Δ-full description of the nn → ppe⁻e⁻ subprocess. It derives the long-range contribution arising from light Majorana neutrino exchange via loop diagrams, incorporates short-range contributions through renormalization counterterms, and provides explicit predictions for the pion-mass dependence of the amplitude in collinear-electron kinematics as well as the amplitude in the degenerate Δ-nucleon mass limit to enable lattice-QCD matching.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a systematic EFT framework for including explicit Δ resonances in 0νββ matrix elements, which may resolve part of the enhancement puzzle in nuclear calculations. The provision of pion-mass dependence and the degenerate-limit long-range prediction constitutes a concrete, falsifiable output that directly supports lattice matching; this is a clear strength of the approach.

minor comments (4)
  1. §2 (power counting): the explicit statement of the chiral order at which the leading long-range loop contribution enters, and the order at which the first short-range counterterms appear, should be given in a single equation or table for clarity.
  2. §4.1 (collinear kinematics): the precise definition of the collinear configuration (e.g., the angle cut or momentum fraction) is stated only in words; a short equation or footnote would remove ambiguity when comparing to lattice data.
  3. The numerical implementation of the loop integrals (regularization scheme, subtraction of power divergences) is described in the text but not cross-checked against an independent method; a brief appendix tabulating the finite parts would strengthen reproducibility.
  4. Reference list: several standard works on Δ-full chiral EFT for weak processes (e.g., on πN scattering or single-beta decay) are not cited; adding them would place the present calculation in clearer context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work on the neutrinoless double-beta decay of the Δ⁻ resonance in chiral EFT. The recognition that this provides a systematic framework for including explicit Δ degrees of freedom in 0νββ matrix elements, along with concrete predictions for pion-mass dependence and the degenerate-mass limit to support lattice matching, is appreciated. We address the report below.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central derivation uses standard chiral EFT loop integrals for the long-range light-Majorana-neutrino-exchange contribution to the Δ⁻ → p e⁻ e⁻ amplitude, together with renormalization-required short-range counterterms whose values are not fitted to the target observable. The reported predictions for pion-mass dependence at collinear kinematics and the degenerate Δ-nucleon limit are direct outputs of these diagrams and power counting, not reductions to the inputs by construction. No self-citation is load-bearing for the headline results, no ansatz is smuggled, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard chiral EFT assumptions plus the treatment of the Delta as an explicit degree of freedom; no new particles or forces are invented, but several low-energy constants remain as free parameters to be determined elsewhere.

free parameters (1)
  • short-range counterterm coefficients
    Local operators required by renormalization whose numerical values are not fixed by the long-range calculation and must be determined by other data or lattice input.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Chiral symmetry and its breaking pattern in QCD
    Invoked to organize the effective Lagrangian and power counting for pion and Delta interactions.
  • domain assumption Validity of the Delta-nucleon mass splitting in the chiral expansion
    The Delta is treated as a heavy degree of freedom whose mass difference from the nucleon is kept finite while taking the chiral limit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1549 out tokens · 31786 ms · 2026-05-10T15:42:56.885815+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    They provide a convenient, model-independent de- scription of the underlying QCD dynamics at low energies

    = 2T ′ 1 −(m ∆ +m N)T ′ 3 .(20b) We refer to the quantitiesTandT ′ as neutrinoless transition form factors (TFFs), as they parameterize the hadronic structure of the neutrinoless ∆→ptransition in the kinematic configuration with collinear electrons. They provide a convenient, model-independent de- scription of the underlying QCD dynamics at low energies. ...

    2020

  2. [2]

    Using the EOM for the ∆, it further reduces top µ

  3. [3]

    We have factored outG= (2 √ 2GF Vud)2mββ hto get similar form as the amplitude in Eq

    Therefore, the independent counterterm Lagrangian with one derivative takes the form L1,ct =G ¯N( ← −∂ µ −Γ µ)(h1 +h ′ 1γ5)u†τ +uτ iu†τ +uΨi µ¯eLC¯eT L + H.c.,(B1) whereu †τ +uτ iu†τ +uhas been inserted between the fields to reproduce the correct chiral transformation properties andh 1 andh ′ 1 are dimensionless coupling constants. We have factored outG= ...

  4. [4]

    Fukuda et al

    Y. Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1562 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9807003

    work page arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Q. R. Ahmadet al.(SNO), Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 011301 (2002), arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008

    work page arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    Eguchiet al.(KamLAND), First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance, Phys

    K. Eguchiet al.(KamLAND), First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti- neutrino disappearance, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 021802 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0212021

    work page arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    Akeret al.(KATRIN), Science388, adq9592 (2025), arXiv:2406.13516 [nucl-ex]

    M. Akeret al.(KATRIN), Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN data, Science388, adq9592 (2025), arXiv:2406.13516 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. As- trophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP02, 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrinoless Double beta Decay in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D25, 2951 (1982). 23

    1982

  11. [11]

    Abeet al.[KamLAND-Zen], arXiv:2406.11438 [hep-ex] (2024)

    S. Abeet al.(KamLAND-Zen), Search for Majorana Neutrinos with the Complete KamLAND- Zen Dataset, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 262501 (2025), arXiv:2406.11438 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Leptogenesis

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Leptogenesis, Phys. Rept.466, 105 (2008), arXiv:0802.2962 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    Acharyaet al.(LEGEND), First Results on the Search for Lepton Number Violating Neu- trinoless Double-βDecay with the LEGEND-200 Experiment, Phys

    H. Acharyaet al.(LEGEND), First Results on the Search for Lepton Number Violating Neu- trinoless Double-βDecay with the LEGEND-200 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 022701 (2026), arXiv:2505.10440 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Alfonsoet al.(CUPID), Sensitivity of the CUPID experiment to 0νββdecay of 100Mo, (2025), arXiv:2504.14369 [nucl-ex]

    K. Alfonsoet al.(CUPID), Sensitivity of the CUPID experiment to 0νββdecay of 100Mo, (2025), arXiv:2504.14369 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Zhanget al.(PandaX), Searching for neutrinoless double-beta decay of 136Xe with PandaX- 4T, Sci

    S. Zhanget al.(PandaX), Searching for neutrinoless double-beta decay of 136Xe with PandaX- 4T, Sci. Bull.70, 1779 (2025), arXiv:2412.13979 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Agrawalet al.(AMoRE), Improved Limit on Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of Mo100 from AMoRE-I, Phys

    A. Agrawalet al.(AMoRE), Improved Limit on Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of Mo100 from AMoRE-I, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 082501 (2025), arXiv:2407.05618 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Novellaet al.(NEXT), Demonstration of neutrinoless double beta decay searches in gaseous xenon with NEXT, JHEP09, 190, arXiv:2305.09435 [nucl-ex]

    P. Novellaet al.(NEXT), Demonstration of neutrinoless double beta decay searches in gaseous xenon with NEXT, JHEP09, 190, arXiv:2305.09435 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Zhanget al.(CDEX), Searching for 76Ge neutrinoless double beta decay with the CDEX- 1B experiment*, Chin

    B.-T. Zhanget al.(CDEX), Searching for 76Ge neutrinoless double beta decay with the CDEX- 1B experiment*, Chin. Phys. C48, 103001 (2024), arXiv:2305.00894 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    I. J. Arnquistet al.(Majorana), Final Result of the Majorana Demonstrator’s Search for Neutrinoless Double-βDecay in Ge76, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 062501 (2023), arXiv:2207.07638 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Azzoliniet al.(CUPID), Final Result on the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 82Se with CUPID-0, Phys

    O. Azzoliniet al.(CUPID), Final Result on the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 82Se with CUPID-0, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 111801 (2022), arXiv:2206.05130 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), Double-Weak Decays of 124Xe and 136Xe in the XENON1T and XENONnT Experiments, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Double-Weak Decays of 124Xe and 136Xe in the XENON1T and XENONnT Experiments, Phys. Rev. C106, 024328 (2022), arXiv:2205.04158 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    D. Q. Adamset al.(CUORE), Search for Majorana neutrinos exploiting millikelvin cryogenics with CUORE, Nature604, 53 (2022), arXiv:2104.06906 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Agostiniet al.(GERDA), Final Results of GERDA on the Search for Neutrinoless Double-β Decay, Phys

    M. Agostiniet al.(GERDA), Final Results of GERDA on the Search for Neutrinoless Double-β Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 252502 (2020), arXiv:2009.06079 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violating process Ξ − →Σe −e− +c.c

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violating process Ξ − →Σe −e− +c.c. , (2025), arXiv:2511.15394 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violating decayη→π +π+e−e−+c.c

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violating decayη→π +π+e−e−+c.c. viaJ/ψ→ϕη, (2025), arXiv:2509.21921 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violation decayω→π +π+e−e−+c.c., (2025), arXiv:2504.21539 [hep-ex]

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violation decayω→π +π+e−e−+c.c., (2025), arXiv:2504.21539 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for lepton number violating decays of D + s →h −h0e+e+, JHEP01, 109, arXiv:2410.02421 [hep-ex]

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for lepton number violating decays of D + s →h −h0e+e+, JHEP01, 109, arXiv:2410.02421 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violating decay Σ − →pe −e− and the rare inclusive decay Σ − →Σ +X, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for the lepton number violating decay Σ − →pe −e− and the rare inclusive decay Σ − →Σ +X, Phys. Rev. D103, 052011 (2021), arXiv:2012.03592 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for heavy Majorana neutrino in lepton number violating decays ofD→Kπe +e+, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Search for heavy Majorana neutrino in lepton number violating decays ofD→Kπe +e+, Phys. Rev. D99, 112002 (2019), arXiv:1902.02450 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Searches for 25 rare and forbidden decays ofD + andD + s mesons, JHEP 24 06, 044, arXiv:2011.00217 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Searches for 25 rare and forbidden decays ofD + andD + s mesons, JHEP 24 06, 044, arXiv:2011.00217 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Searches for Majorana neutrinos inB − decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Searches for Majorana neutrinos inB − decays, Phys. Rev. D85, 112004 (2012), arXiv:1201.5600 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Rajaramet al.(HyperCP), Search for the lepton-number-violating decay Ξ − →pµ −µ−, Phys

    D. Rajaramet al.(HyperCP), Search for the lepton-number-violating decay Ξ − →pµ −µ−, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 181801 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0505025

    work page arXiv 2005

  33. [33]

    Brase, J

    C. Brase, J. Men´ endez, E. A. Coello P´ erez, and A. Schwenk, Neutrinoless double-βdecay from an effective field theory for heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C106, 034309 (2022), arXiv:2108.11805 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Agostini, G

    M. Agostini, G. Benato, J. A. Detwiler, J. Men´ endez, and F. Vissani, Toward the discov- ery of matter creation with neutrinolessββdecay, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 025002 (2023), arXiv:2202.01787 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    J. M. Yao, J. Meng, Y. F. Niu, and P. Ring, Beyond-mean-field approaches for nuclear neu- trinoless double beta decay in the standard mechanism, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.126, 103965 (2022), arXiv:2111.15543 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    M. J. Dolinski, A. W. P. Poon, and W. Rodejohann, Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: Status and Prospects, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69, 219 (2019), arXiv:1902.04097 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    H. W. Hammer, S. K¨ onig, and U. van Kolck, Nuclear effective field theory: status and per- spectives, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 025004 (2020), arXiv:1906.12122 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces

    R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem, Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces, Phys. Rept. 503, 1 (2011), arXiv:1105.2919 [nucl-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces

    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1773 (2009), arXiv:0811.1338 [nucl-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  40. [40]

    Cirigliano, W

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, E. Mereghetti, and A. Walker-Loud, Neutrinoless double-βdecay in effective field theory: The light-Majorana neutrino-exchange mechanism, Phys. Rev. C97, 065501 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 100, 019903 (2019)], arXiv:1710.01729 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Pastore, J

    S. Pastore, J. Carlson, V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, E. Mereghetti, and R. B. Wiringa, Neu- trinoless double-βdecay matrix elements in light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C97, 014606 (2018), arXiv:1710.05026 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    A neutrinoless double beta decay master formula from effective field theory

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, M. L. Graesser, and E. Mereghetti, A neutrinoless double beta decay master formula from effective field theory, JHEP12, 097, arXiv:1806.02780 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  43. [43]

    A new leading contribution to neutrinoless double-beta decay

    V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. De Vries, M. L. Graesser, E. Mereghetti, S. Pastore, and U. Van Kolck, New Leading Contribution to Neutrinoless Double-βDecay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 202001 (2018), arXiv:1802.10097 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    L.-J. Wang, J. Engel, and J. M. Yao, Quenching of nuclear matrix elements for 0νββdecay by chiral two-body currents, Phys. Rev. C98, 031301 (2018), arXiv:1805.10276 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Yang and P

    Y. Yang and P. Zhao, Relativistic model-free prediction for neutrinoless double beta decay at leading order, Phys. Lett. B855, 138782 (2024), arXiv:2308.03356 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Y. L. Yang and P. W. Zhao, Next-to-Leading-Order Prediction for the Neutrinoless Double- Beta Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 242502 (2025), arXiv:2505.24121 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    S. M. Bilenky and C. Giunti, Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: a Probe of Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30, 1530001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4791 [hep-ph]. 25

    work page arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1566 (1979)

    1979

  49. [49]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, Heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory with light deltas, J. Phys. G24, 1831 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9712496

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  50. [50]

    D.-L. Yao, D. Siemens, V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, H. Krebs, and U.-G. Meißner, Pion-nucleon scattering in covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory with explicit Delta resonances, JHEP05, 038, arXiv:1603.03638 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Bernard, Chiral Perturbation Theory and Baryon Properties, Prog

    V. Bernard, Chiral Perturbation Theory and Baryon Properties, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.60, 82 (2008), arXiv:0706.0312 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  52. [52]

    Krebs, E

    H. Krebs, E. Epelbaum, and U.-G. Meißner, Nuclear forces with Delta-excitations up to next- to-next-to-leading order. I. Peripheral nucleon-nucleon waves, Eur. Phys. J. A32, 127 (2007), arXiv:nucl-th/0703087

    work page arXiv 2007

  53. [53]

    Siemens, J

    D. Siemens, J. Ruiz de Elvira, E. Epelbaum, M. Hoferichter, H. Krebs, B. Kubis, and U. G. Meißner, Reconciling threshold and subthreshold expansions for pion–nucleon scattering, Phys. Lett. B770, 27 (2017), arXiv:1610.08978 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Ekstr¨ om, G

    A. Ekstr¨ om, G. Hagen, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock, and P. D. Schwartz, ∆ isobars and nuclear saturation, Phys. Rev. C97, 024332 (2018), arXiv:1707.09028 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Chambers-Wall, J

    G. Chambers-Wall, J. Lieffers, G. B. King, E. Mereghetti, S. Pastore, M. Piarulli, and R. B. Wiringa, Three-nucleon lepton-number-violating potentials in chiral effective field theory and their matrix elements in light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C113, 025502 (2026), arXiv:2510.21564 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Weinberg, Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B251, 288 (1990)

    1990

  57. [57]

    Weinberg, Effective chiral Lagrangians for nucleon - pion interactions and nuclear forces, Nucl

    S. Weinberg, Effective chiral Lagrangians for nucleon - pion interactions and nuclear forces, Nucl. Phys. B363, 3 (1991)

    1991

  58. [58]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B67, 421 (1977)

    1977

  59. [59]

    Complex Spinors and Unified Theories

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C790927, 315 (1979), arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1979

  60. [60]

    Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf

    T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C7902131, 95 (1979)

    1979

  61. [61]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D22, 2227 (1980)

    1980

  62. [62]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 912 (1980)

    1980

  63. [63]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop, Annals Phys.158, 142 (1984)

    1984

  64. [64]

    Fettes, U.-G

    N. Fettes, U.-G. Meißner, M. Mojzis, and S. Steininger, The Chiral effective pion nucleon Lagrangian of order p**4, Annals Phys.283, 273 (2000), [Erratum: Annals Phys. 288, 249– 250 (2001)], arXiv:hep-ph/0001308

    work page arXiv 2000

  65. [65]

    Meißner and A

    U.-G. Meißner and A. Rusetsky,Effective Field Theories(Cambridge University Press, 2022)

    2022

  66. [66]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys. 26 Rev.177, 2239 (1969)

    1969

  68. [68]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2., Phys. Rev.177, 2247 (1969)

    1969

  69. [69]

    Rarita and J

    W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, On a theory of particles with half integral spin, Phys. Rev.60, 61 (1941)

    1941

  70. [70]

    Tang and P

    H.-B. Tang and P. J. Ellis, Redundance of Delta isobar parameters in effective field theories, Phys. Lett. B387, 9 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9606432

    work page arXiv 1996

  71. [71]

    Scherer and M

    S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler,A Primer for Chiral Perturbation Theory, Vol. 830 (2012)

    2012

  72. [72]

    Pascalutsa, Correspondence of consistent and inconsistent spin - 3/2 couplings via the equivalence theorem, Phys

    V. Pascalutsa, Correspondence of consistent and inconsistent spin - 3/2 couplings via the equivalence theorem, Phys. Lett. B503, 85 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008026

    work page arXiv 2001

  73. [73]

    Krebs, E

    H. Krebs, E. Epelbaum, and U. G. Meißner, Redundancy of the off-shell parameters in chiral effective field theory with explicit spin-3/2 degrees of freedom, Phys. Lett. B683, 222 (2010), arXiv:0905.2744 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, Systematic 1/M expansion for spin 3/2 parti- cles in baryon chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B395, 89 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9606456

    work page arXiv 1997

  75. [75]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. B¨ ohm, and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feyn- man amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun.64, 345 (1991)

    1991

  76. [76]

    New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun.207, 432 (2016), arXiv:1601.01167 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun.256, 107478 (2020), arXiv:2001.04407 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    FeynHelpers: Connecting FeynCalc to FIRE and Package-X

    V. Shtabovenko, FeynHelpers: Connecting FeynCalc to FIRE and Package-X, Comput. Phys. Commun.218, 48 (2017), arXiv:1611.06793 [physics.comp-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    Passarino and M

    G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman, One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B160, 151 (1979)

    1979

  80. [80]

    H. H. Patel, Package-X 2.0: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun.218, 66 (2017), arXiv:1612.00009 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.