pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13163 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Covariant phase space approach to noncommutativity in tensile and tensionless open strings

Pratik K. Das , Sarthak Duary , Sourav Maji
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords open stringsnoncommutativityKalb-Ramond fieldcovariant phase spacetensionless stringsD-branesBorn-Infeld actionsymplectic form
0
0 comments X

The pith

A constant Kalb-Ramond field localizes the symplectic structure of open strings to their endpoints, producing noncommutative Poisson brackets for both tensile and tensionless cases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the covariant phase space formalism to examine how a constant antisymmetric background field affects the phase space of open strings. It demonstrates that the presymplectic current decomposes into a bulk kinetic piece plus a total-derivative boundary term; when the background is constant the bulk piece drops out, leaving a purely boundary-supported symplectic form. For ordinary tensile strings this reproduces the familiar Seiberg-Witten noncommutativity of the endpoint coordinates. For intrinsically tensionless strings, where the phase space would otherwise be degenerate, the same boundary localization supplies a non-degenerate Poisson structure. Adding a boundary gauge field replaces the Kalb-Ramond strength by the effective Born-Infeld combination that appears on D-branes.

Core claim

In the covariant phase space formalism the presymplectic current for an open string in a constant Kalb-Ramond field B splits into a bulk term plus an exact boundary term. When B is constant the bulk contribution cancels or vanishes, so the entire symplectic form is supported on the string endpoints. The endpoint coordinates therefore satisfy a noncommutative Poisson bracket whose strength is set by the inverse of the open-string metric and B combination. For tensionless strings the same localization resolves the degeneracy of the reduced phase space. Coupling to a boundary gauge field A replaces B by the effective Born-Infeld factor.

What carries the argument

Boundary localization of the symplectic current induced by a constant Kalb-Ramond field, which converts the phase space into a purely boundary-supported structure whose Poisson brackets encode noncommutativity.

If this is right

  • The endpoint coordinates of both tensile and tensionless open strings obey the same noncommutative algebra determined by the Seiberg-Witten map.
  • The reduced phase space of tensionless strings becomes non-degenerate once the constant B-field is turned on.
  • Inclusion of a D-brane gauge field yields a symplectic form controlled by the Born-Infeld determinant.
  • The formalism supplies a single derivation that covers both string regimes without separate case-by-case calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Noncommutativity appears as an intrinsic property of the open-string endpoints once the background is constant, rather than a bulk effect.
  • The same boundary-localization mechanism could be tested on higher-dimensional branes or on closed strings with suitable fluxes.
  • One could derive the associated star product or correlation functions directly from the boundary Poisson structure obtained here.
  • Extensions to position-dependent or time-dependent B-fields would require retaining the bulk terms and checking consistency with the equations of motion.

Load-bearing premise

The covariant phase space construction for tensionless strings with constant background fields yields a well-defined reduced phase space whose only degeneracy is removed by boundary localization.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the Poisson brackets between the two endpoint coordinates x(0) and x(π) in the tensionless case with nonzero constant B, checking whether they reproduce the expected noncommutative relation with θ given by the standard B-field inverse.

read the original abstract

We study noncommutativity in open strings using the covariant phase space formalism. For tensile open strings in a constant Kalb-Ramond background, we show that the (pre)-symplectic current splits into a bulk kinetic term plus an exact boundary term, recovering the Seiberg-Witten noncommutativity parameter. We then extend the analysis to intrinsically tensionless strings. In the absence of background fields, the reduced phase space is degenerate and carries no intrinsic Poisson structure. In the presence of a constant Kalb-Ramond field, the symplectic current localises entirely on the boundary, so that the physical phase space becomes purely boundary-supported and the endpoint coordinates acquire a noncommutative Poisson algebra. Including a boundary gauge-field coupling similarly leads to a boundary symplectic form governed by the effective Born-Infeld combination on the D-brane. Our results provide a unified description of noncommutativity in both tensile and tensionless open strings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the covariant phase space formalism to open strings in a constant Kalb-Ramond background. For tensile strings it shows that the presymplectic current decomposes into a bulk kinetic term plus an exact boundary term, recovering the Seiberg-Witten noncommutativity parameter. For intrinsically tensionless strings the reduced phase space is degenerate without background fields, but the inclusion of a constant B-field causes the symplectic current to localize entirely on the boundary, yielding a noncommutative Poisson algebra on the endpoint coordinates. A parallel boundary localization is obtained when a boundary gauge-field coupling is added, producing an effective Born-Infeld structure on the D-brane.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a unified covariant-phase-space treatment of noncommutativity that recovers a known result for tensile strings and extends it to the tensionless case. The boundary-localization mechanism and the emergence of the Born-Infeld combination constitute concrete, falsifiable statements about the reduced phase space that could be tested against other approaches to tensionless strings and D-brane dynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section on tensionless strings with constant Kalb-Ramond field] The claim that the presymplectic current localizes entirely on the boundary for tensionless strings in a constant Kalb-Ramond field is load-bearing for the novel result. Because the tensionless action is governed by a degenerate worldsheet metric and a distinct set of constraints, an explicit on-shell computation of the bulk contribution to the symplectic current (showing that all terms either vanish or are proportional to degeneracy directions that are quotiented out) is required; the present treatment leaves this step implicit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction should briefly specify the precise tensionless action (Schild, null-string, or equivalent) employed, as different formulations can alter the constraint structure and the resulting phase-space reduction.
  2. [Throughout the manuscript] Notation for the presymplectic current, its splitting, and the boundary term should be made uniform between the tensile and tensionless analyses to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment. We address the point raised below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate an explicit computation as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on tensionless strings with constant Kalb-Ramond field] The claim that the presymplectic current localizes entirely on the boundary for tensionless strings in a constant Kalb-Ramond field is load-bearing for the novel result. Because the tensionless action is governed by a degenerate worldsheet metric and a distinct set of constraints, an explicit on-shell computation of the bulk contribution to the symplectic current (showing that all terms either vanish or are proportional to degeneracy directions that are quotiented out) is required; the present treatment leaves this step implicit.

    Authors: We agree that the boundary localization of the presymplectic current is central to the tensionless result and that an explicit on-shell verification of the bulk terms is needed for rigor. In the original manuscript this step was presented implicitly by appealing to the degeneracy of the worldsheet metric and the structure of the constraints. To address the referee's concern directly, we will add a dedicated subsection in the revised version that performs the explicit computation: we evaluate the bulk contribution to the presymplectic current on-shell, demonstrate that it vanishes identically or lies in the kernel of the degenerate directions (which are quotiented out when passing to the reduced phase space), and thereby confirm that only the boundary term survives. This addition will make the argument self-contained while leaving the physical conclusions unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: explicit variation yields boundary localization independently for tensionless case

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard tensionless open-string action (Schild or null-string form) plus constant Kalb-Ramond term, performs the covariant phase-space variation to obtain the presymplectic current, and directly computes that the bulk contribution vanishes on-shell while the boundary term remains. This is a first-principles calculation, not a fit or redefinition of prior quantities. The tensile case recovers the known Seiberg-Witten parameter via the same procedure, serving as a consistency check rather than an input. No self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise; the tensionless localization follows from the degeneracy of the worldsheet metric and the specific form of the B-field coupling. The reduced phase space and endpoint Poisson algebra are therefore outputs of the variation, not inputs renamed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the paper relies on standard domain assumptions of string theory and symplectic geometry without introducing new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The covariant phase space formalism applies to open string worldsheets with boundaries.
    This is the core technical method invoked throughout the abstract.
  • domain assumption A constant Kalb-Ramond field constitutes a valid background for both tensile and tensionless open strings.
    Invoked to obtain the boundary localization and noncommutative algebra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1478 out tokens · 32911 ms · 2026-05-10T14:26:09.625434+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Witten,Noncommutative Geometry and String Field Theory,Nucl

    E. Witten,Noncommutative Geometry and String Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 253

    1986

  2. [2]

    String Theory and Noncommutative Geometry

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,String theory and noncommutative geometry,JHEP09(1999) 032 [hep-th/9908142]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  3. [3]

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,More on mixed boundary conditions and D-branes bound states,Phys. Lett. B425(1998) 48 [hep-th/9712199]

    work page arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Ardalan, H

    F. Ardalan, H. Arfaei and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,Mixed branes and M(atrix) theory on noncommutative torus, in6th International Symposium on Particles, Strings and Cosmology, pp. 653–656, 3, 1998,hep-th/9803067. – 39 –

    work page arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,SuperYang-Mills theory on noncommutative torus from open strings interactions,Phys. Lett. B450(1999) 119 [hep-th/9810179]

    work page arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Ardalan, H

    F. Ardalan, H. Arfaei and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,Noncommutative geometry from strings and branes,JHEP02(1999) 016 [hep-th/9810072]

    work page arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and A. Shirzad,Boundary conditions as Dirac constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C19(2001) 383 [hep-th/9907055]

    work page arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Connes, M.R

    A. Connes, M. R. Douglas and A. S. Schwarz,Noncommutative geometry and matrix theory: Compactification on tori,JHEP02(1998) 003 [hep-th/9711162]

    work page arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    M. R. Douglas and C. M. Hull,D-branes and the noncommutative torus,JHEP02(1998) 008 [hep-th/9711165]

    work page arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    A. S. Schwarz,Morita equivalence and duality,Nucl. Phys. B534(1998) 720 [hep-th/9805034]

    work page arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    M. A. Rieffel and A. S. Schwarz,Morita equivalence of multidimensional noncommutative tori, Int. J. Math.10(1999) 289 [math/9803057]

    work page arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    Astashkevich, N

    A. Astashkevich, N. Nekrasov and A. S. Schwarz,On noncommutative Nahm transform, Commun. Math. Phys.211(2000) 167 [hep-th/9810147]

    work page arXiv 2000

  13. [13]

    Morariu and B

    B. Morariu and B. Zumino,SuperYang-Mills on the noncommutative torus, inRichard Arnowitt Fest: A Symposium on Supersymmetry and Gravitation, pp. 53–69, 7, 1998,hep-th/9807198

    work page arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    Brace and B

    D. Brace and B. Morariu,A Note on the BPS spectrum of the matrix model,JHEP02(1999) 004 [hep-th/9810185]

    work page arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Brace, B

    D. Brace, B. Morariu and B. Zumino,Dualities of the matrix model from T duality of the Type II string,Nucl. Phys. B545(1999) 192 [hep-th/9810099]

    work page arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Brace, B

    D. Brace, B. Morariu and B. Zumino,T duality and Ramond-Ramond backgrounds in the matrix model,Nucl. Phys. B549(1999) 181 [hep-th/9811213]

    work page arXiv 1999

  17. [17]

    Hofman and E

    C. Hofman and E. P. Verlinde,U duality of Born-Infeld on the noncommutative two torus, JHEP12(1998) 010 [hep-th/9810116]

    work page arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. S. Schwarz,Instantons on noncommutative R**4 and (2,0) superconformal six-dimensional theory,Commun. Math. Phys.198(1998) 689 [hep-th/9802068]

    work page arXiv 1998

  19. [19]

    Berkooz,Nonlocal field theories and the noncommutative torus,Phys

    M. Berkooz,Nonlocal field theories and the noncommutative torus,Phys. Lett. B430(1998) 237 [hep-th/9802069]

    work page arXiv 1998

  20. [20]

    G. J. Zuckerman,ACTION PRINCIPLES AND GLOBAL GEOMETRY,Conf. Proc. C 8607214(1986) 259

    1986

  21. [21]

    Crnkovic and E

    C. Crnkovic and E. Witten,Covariant Description of Canonical Formalism in Geometrical Theories,Print-86-1309 (PRINCETON)(1986) . – 40 –

    1986

  22. [22]

    Crnkovic,Symplectic Geometry of the Covariant Phase Space, Superstrings and Superspace, Class

    C. Crnkovic,Symplectic Geometry of the Covariant Phase Space, Superstrings and Superspace, Class. Quant. Grav.5(1988) 1557

    1988

  23. [23]

    Lee and R

    J. Lee and R. M. Wald,Local symmetries and constraints,J. Math. Phys.31(1990) 725

    1990

  24. [24]

    R. M. Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R3427 [gr-qc/9307038]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  25. [25]

    Some Properties of Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald,Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 846 [gr-qc/9403028]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  26. [26]

    Covariant phase space with boundaries,

    D. Harlow and J.-Q. Wu,Covariant phase space with boundaries,JHEP10(2020) 146 [1906.08616]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Ashtekar, L

    A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli and O. Reula,THE COVARIANT PHASE SPACE OF ASYMPTOTICALLY FLAT GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS,

  28. [28]

    R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas,A General definition of ¨ conserved quantities¨ ın general relativity and other theories of gravity,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 084027 [gr-qc/9911095]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Barnich and G

    G. Barnich and G. Compere,Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability,J. Math. Phys.49(2008) 042901 [0708.2378]

    work page arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    Chandrasekaran, É

    V. Chandrasekaran, ´E. ´E. Flanagan and K. Prabhu,Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries,JHEP11(2018) 125 [1807.11499]

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Chandrasekaran, E

    V. Chandrasekaran, E. E. Flanagan, I. Shehzad and A. J. Speranza,A general framework for gravitational charges and holographic renormalization,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A37(2022) 2250105 [2111.11974]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Adami, D

    H. Adami, D. Grumiller, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, H. Yavartanoo and C. Zwikel, Null boundary phase space: slicings, news & memory,JHEP11(2021) 155 [2110.04218]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Ciambelli, R

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh and P.-C. Pai,Embeddings and Integrable Charges for Extended Corner Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) [2111.13181]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Ciambelli and R

    L. Ciambelli and R. G. Leigh,Universal corner symmetry and the orbit method for gravity, Nucl. Phys. B986(2023) 116053 [2207.06441]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Ciambelli, From Asymptotic Symmetries to the Corner Proposal, PoSModave2022, 002 (2023), arXiv:2212.13644 [hep-th]

    L. Ciambelli,From Asymptotic Symmetries to the Corner Proposal,PoSModave2022(2023) 002 [2212.13644]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald,Stability of Black Holes and Black Branes,Commun. Math. Phys. 321(2013) 629 [1201.0463]

    work page arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    A. C. Wall,A Second Law for Higher Curvature Gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2015) 1544014 [1504.08040]

    work page arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Hollands, R

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald and V. G. Zhang,Entropy of dynamical black holes,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 024070 [2402.00818]. – 41 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    M. R. Visser and Z. Yan,Properties of dynamical black hole entropy,JHEP10(2024) 029 [2403.07140]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Chandrasekaran and ´E

    V. Chandrasekaran and ´E. ´E. Flanagan,Subregion algebras in classical and quantum gravity, 2601.07915

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel,Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,JHEP09(2016) 102 [1601.04744]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    A. J. Speranza,Local emanations of the covariant phase space,JHEP02(2018) 021 [1706.05061]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Parvizi, M.M

    A. Parvizi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and V. Taghiloo,Freelance holography, part I: Setting boundary conditions free in gauge/gravity correspondence,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 043 [2503.09371]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Parvizi, M.M

    A. Parvizi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and V. Taghiloo,Freelance holography, part II: Moving boundary in gauge/gravity correspondence,SciPost Phys. Core8(2025) 075 [2503.09372]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs

    T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Lukyanov, L.-Y. Ng and T. Takayanagi,Universal First Law of Entanglement Entropy,JHEP03(2014) 051 [1312.7856]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Gravitational Dynamics From Entanglement "Thermodynamics"

    N. Lashkari, M. B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk,Universal first law of entanglement entropy and circle Virasoro orbit diffs,JHEP04(2014) 152 [1308.3716]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    Nonlinear Gravity from Entanglement in Conformal Field Theories

    T. Faulkner, F. M. Haehl, E. Hijano, O. Parrikar, C. Rabideau and M. Van Raamsdonk, Nonlinear Gravity from Entanglement in Conformal Field Theories,JHEP08(2017) 057 [1705.03026]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    F. M. Haehl, E. Hijano, O. Parrikar and C. Rabideau,Higher Curvature Gravity from Entanglement in Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 201602 [1712.06620]

    work page arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S. J. Suh,Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy,JHEP06(2016) 004 [1512.06431]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Lashkari and M

    N. Lashkari and M. Van Raamsdonk,Canonical Energy is Quantum Fisher Information,JHEP 04(2016) 153 [1508.00897]

    work page arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    C. A. Ag´ on, E. C´ aceres and J. F. Pedraza,Bit threads, Einstein’s equations and bulk locality, JHEP01(2021) 193 [2007.07907]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    P. K. Das and M. Mahato,Bit threads: from entanglement to geometric entropies,JHEP01 (2026) 049 [2508.18941]

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    M. Cho, B. Mazel and X. Yin,Rolling tachyon and the phase space of open string field theory, JHEP04(2025) 129 [2310.17895]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Bernardes, T

    V. Bernardes, T. Erler and A. H. Fırat,Covariant phase space and L ∞ algebras,JHEP09 (2025) 057 [2506.20706]. – 42 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Bernardes, T

    V. Bernardes, T. Erler and A. H. Fırat,Symplectic structure in open string field theory. Part I. Rolling tachyons,JHEP02(2026) 063 [2511.03777]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Bernardes, T

    V. Bernardes, T. Erler and A. H. Fırat,Symplectic structure in open string field theory. Part II. Sliding lump,JHEP02(2026) 064 [2511.15781]

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Symplectic structure in open string field theory III: Electric field,

    V. Bernardes, T. Erler and A. H. Fırat,Symplectic structure in open string field theory III: Electric field,2604.01273

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    The BEF Symplectic Form: A Lagrangian Perspective

    M. Ali and G. Stettinger,The BEF Symplectic Form: A Lagrangian Perspective,2604.07334

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Anderson,Introduction to the variational bicomplex, 1992, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55453884

    I. Anderson,Introduction to the variational bicomplex, 1992, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55453884

    1992

  60. [60]

    Hajian and M

    K. Hajian and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,Solution Phase Space and Conserved Charges: A General Formulation for Charges Associated with Exact Symmetries,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 044074 [1512.05584]

    work page arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Margalef-Bentabol and E

    J. Margalef-Bentabol and E. J. S. Villase˜ nor,Geometric formulation of the Covariant Phase Space methods with boundaries,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 025011 [2008.01842]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Margalef-Bentabol and E

    J. Margalef-Bentabol and E. J. S. Villase˜ nor,Proof of the equivalence of the symplectic forms derived from the canonical and the covariant phase space formalisms,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L101701 [2204.06383]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    E. G. Reyes,On Covariant Phase Space and the Variational Bicomplex,Int. J. Theor. Phys.43 (2004) 1267

    2004

  64. [64]

    Barnich and F

    G. Barnich and F. Brandt,Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,Nucl. Phys. B633(2002) 3 [hep-th/0111246]

    work page arXiv 2002

  65. [65]

    Speziale,GGI lectures on boundary and asymptotic symmetries, 2512.16810

    S. Speziale,GGI lectures on boundary and asymptotic symmetries,2512.16810

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Classical and quantized tensionless strings,

    J. Isberg, U. Lindstrom, B. Sundborg and G. Theodoridis,Classical and quantized tensionless strings,Nucl. Phys. B411(1994) 122 [hep-th/9307108]

    work page arXiv 1994

  67. [67]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. 7, 1988

    1988

  68. [68]

    The Tensionless Lives of Null Strings,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Chatterjee and P. Pandit,The Tensionless Lives of Null Strings, 2601.20959

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries,

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty and P. Parekh,Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries, JHEP01(2016) 158 [1507.04361]

    work page arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984, 10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001

    work page doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 1984

  71. [71]

    Duary and S

    S. Duary and S. Maji,From closed to open strings: the tensionless route in Kalb-Ramond background and noncommutativity,2511.20917. – 43 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  72. [72]

    Banerjee, R

    A. Banerjee, R. Chatterjee and P. Pandit,Tensionless strings in a Kalb-Ramond background, JHEP06(2024) 067 [2404.01385]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Chu and P.-M

    C.-S. Chu and P.-M. Ho,Constrained quantization of open string in background B field and noncommutative D-brane,Nucl. Phys. B568(2000) 447 [hep-th/9906192]

    work page arXiv 2000

  74. [74]

    Herbst, A

    M. Herbst, A. Kling and M. Kreuzer,Star products from open strings in curved backgrounds, JHEP09(2001) 014 [hep-th/0106159]

    work page arXiv 2001

  75. [75]

    Schomerus,D-branes and deformation quantization,JHEP06(1999) 030 [hep-th/9903205]

    V. Schomerus,D-branes and deformation quantization,JHEP06(1999) 030 [hep-th/9903205]

    work page arXiv 1999

  76. [76]

    Blumenhagen,A Course on Noncommutative Geometry in String Theory,Fortsch

    R. Blumenhagen,A Course on Noncommutative Geometry in String Theory,Fortsch. Phys.62 (2014) 709 [1403.4805]

    work page arXiv 2014

  77. [77]

    Cornalba and R

    L. Cornalba and R. Schiappa,Nonassociative star product deformations for D-brane world volumes in curved backgrounds,Commun. Math. Phys.225(2002) 33 [hep-th/0101219]

    work page arXiv 2002

  78. [78]

    Herbst, A

    M. Herbst, A. Kling and M. Kreuzer,Cyclicity of nonassociative products on D-branes,JHEP 03(2004) 003 [hep-th/0312043]

    work page arXiv 2004

  79. [79]

    V. P. Nair,Geometric Quantization and Applications to Fields and Fluids. Springer Nature, 2024, 10.1007/978-3-031-65801-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65801-3 2024

  80. [80]

    Kontsevich, ”Deformation Quantization of Poisson M anifolds”, Lett

    M. Kontsevich,Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. 1.,Lett. Math. Phys.66(2003) 157 [q-alg/9709040]

    work page arXiv 2003

Showing first 80 references.