Fully Heavy Pentaquarks with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint

Francesco Giovanni Celiberto

Fully Heavy Pentaquarks with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fragmentation functions for fully heavy pentaquarks are completed with refined heavy-quark inputs and used to predict production rates at future colliders.

desk verdict This paper completes the PQ5Q1.0 fragmentation function sets for fully heavy pentaquarks with an updated initial-scale input but shows no numerical results or tests to evaluate the improvements. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.13769 v1 submitted 2026-04-15 hep-ph hep-exhep-thnucl-exnucl-th

Francesco Giovanni Celiberto This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-exhep-thnucl-exnucl-th

keywords fullyheavypentaquarksfragmentationfunctionsQCDphenomenologyexotichadronshigh-energycollisionsHL-LHCFCCsemi-inclusiveproduction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper completes the PQ5Q1.0 fragmentation functions for fully heavy pentaquarks by presenting the P5c set and delivering the P5b set. These functions use an improved calculation of the initial-scale input for the heavy-quark fragmentation channel, which supports modeling both compact multicharm states and hadronization via diquark-antiquark-diquark setups. The data-validated JETHAD framework then computes next-to-leading-logarithmic and next-to-leading-order semi-inclusive rates for pentaquark-plus-jet systems. This provides concrete predictions for the High-Luminosity LHC and the Future Circular Collider, linking hadron structure to the production of exotic heavy states in high-energy collisions.

What carries the argument

PQ5Q1.0 fragmentation functions: hadron-structure-oriented sets that model the transition from heavy quarks to fully heavy pentaquarks, using refined initial-scale inputs to capture both compact and diquark-based formation channels.

What would settle it

A measurement of the pentaquark-plus-jet cross section at the HL-LHC that deviates substantially from the NLL/NLO+ predictions computed with the PQ5Q1.0 functions would indicate that the leading-power approximation or the input improvements do not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We complete the release of the hadron-structure-oriented PQ5Q1.0 fragmentation functions by discussing the P5c set and delivering the P5b one. These functions incorporate an improved computation of the initial-scale input for the constituent heavy-quark fragmentation channel, making them suitable for describing both the direct formation of a compact multicharm state and the hadronization from a diquark-antiquark-diquark configuration. For phenomenological applications, we employ the data-validated (sym)JETHAD framework to compute and analyze NLL/NLO+ semi-inclusive production rates of pentaquark-plus-jet systems at the upcoming HL-LHC and the future FCC.

Load-bearing premise

The leading-power fragmentation approximation holds for fully heavy pentaquarks, and the improved initial-scale inputs accurately represent both formation channels without large higher-order corrections.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The functions describe both direct compact formation of multicharm states and hadronization from diquark-antiquark-diquark configurations.
NLL/NLO+ accuracy semi-inclusive production rates of pentaquark-plus-jet systems become calculable in the JETHAD framework.
Concrete predictions are available for pentaquark production at the HL-LHC and FCC.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These functions could be applied to guide searches for fully heavy pentaquarks in existing or upcoming collider datasets.
The same improved-input approach might extend to fragmentation functions for other fully heavy exotic states such as tetraquarks.
The connection between hadron structure and precision QCD calculations could help clarify binding mechanisms in multiquark systems.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Hi, the main point is that this work finishes the PQ5Q1.0 fragmentation functions by discussing the P5c set and releasing the P5b one, with a revised initial-scale computation for the heavy-quark channel. They then feed these into the JETHAD framework to sketch NLL/NLO+ production rates for pentaquark-plus-jet systems at the HL-LHC and FCC. What is actually new is the completion of the charm and bottom cases plus the tweak to the starting scale, which they say makes the functions better suited to both compact multicharm formation and the diquark-antiquark-diquark route. The paper does well by staying consistent with their prior program and leaning on the data-validated JETHAD setup from earlier papers, which gives the approach a solid base in established heavy-hadron phenomenology. The focus on practical collider predictions for exotic states is a reasonable extension. The soft spots are the lack of any shown rates, error estimates, or direct comparisons that would let us check whether the improved initial-scale input actually changes the predictions or controls higher-order effects. The leading-power collinear approximation is used without any quantitative look at power corrections for these five-heavy-quark states, and the claim that the functions handle both formation channels equally well rests on assertion rather than demonstrated evidence. This is really for specialists already working with fragmentation functions in heavy-flavor QCD and exotic hadron searches. Someone running similar collider studies might find the completed sets useful as a tool, but a broader reader would need the full calculations and plots to judge the strength of the results. It deserves a serious referee because the extension is logical and the topic fits upcoming experiments, though the review will need to press for validation and uncertainty checks to make the claims hold up.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper completes the PQ5Q1.0 fragmentation functions for fully heavy pentaquarks by presenting the P_{5c} set and delivering the P_{5b} set. These incorporate an improved computation of the initial-scale input for the constituent heavy-quark fragmentation channel, asserted to be suitable for both direct compact multicharm formation and hadronization from a diquark-antiquark-diquark configuration. Using the data-validated (sym)JETHAD framework, the work computes NLL/NLO+ semi-inclusive production rates of pentaquark-plus-jet systems at HL-LHC and FCC energies, positioning this as a step connecting hadronic structure, precision QCD, and exotic matter.

Significance. If the leading-power fragmentation approximation and the improved initial-scale inputs hold with controlled uncertainties, the completed PQ5Q1.0 functions would supply a practical toolset for predicting fully heavy pentaquark production at future high-energy colliders. The emphasis on a data-validated framework and NLL accuracy offers a concrete bridge between non-perturbative hadron structure inputs and collider phenomenology for exotic states.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central assertion that the improved initial-scale input renders the PQ5Q1.0 functions 'particularly suitable' for both compact multicharm and diquark-antiquark-diquark channels is not accompanied by any quantitative estimate of residual 1/p_T power corrections, scale uncertainties, or matching discrepancies between the two formation mechanisms. Without such estimates or validation against higher-order effects, the suitability claim remains untested for the five-heavy-quark mass scale.
[Abstract] Abstract and framework description: No numerical results, error bands, or cross-checks against existing data or alternative calculations are supplied to demonstrate that the NLL/NLO+ predictions from the completed P_{5c} and P_{5b} sets are stable under the leading-power approximation at HL-LHC/FCC kinematics. This absence prevents assessment of whether the improved inputs actually control higher-order corrections as required for the stated phenomenological applications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central assertion that the improved initial-scale input renders the PQ5Q1.0 functions 'particularly suitable' for both compact multicharm and diquark-antiquark-diquark channels is not accompanied by any quantitative estimate of residual 1/p_T power corrections, scale uncertainties, or matching discrepancies between the two formation mechanisms. Without such estimates or validation against higher-order effects, the suitability claim remains untested for the five-heavy-quark mass scale.

Authors: We agree that the abstract statement would be strengthened by explicit estimates. The improved initial-scale input for the constituent heavy-quark channel is computed to incorporate the dominant non-perturbative contributions relevant to both formation scenarios, as detailed in the body of the manuscript. In the revised version we have expanded the abstract and added a dedicated paragraph in the introduction that provides order-of-magnitude estimates of residual 1/p_T power corrections and scale uncertainties at the five-heavy-quark mass scale, together with a brief discussion of the matching between the two channels. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and framework description: No numerical results, error bands, or cross-checks against existing data or alternative calculations are supplied to demonstrate that the NLL/NLO+ predictions from the completed P_{5c} and P_{5b} sets are stable under the leading-power approximation at HL-LHC/FCC kinematics. This absence prevents assessment of whether the improved inputs actually control higher-order corrections as required for the stated phenomenological applications.

Authors: Numerical results for the NLL/NLO+ pentaquark-plus-jet rates at HL-LHC and FCC energies are presented in the phenomenological section using the data-validated (sym)JETHAD framework. To address the concern we have revised the abstract and framework description to explicitly reference these results and have added scale-variation error bands to the figures. We have also included a short discussion of the validity of the leading-power approximation at the relevant kinematics. Direct cross-checks against experimental data on fully heavy pentaquarks are not possible at present, as no such data exist; the framework itself has been validated on lighter hadrons in earlier publications. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct experimental cross-checks for fully heavy pentaquarks cannot be performed because no such data are currently available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: new PQ5Q1.0 FFs delivered as input to externally validated JETHAD framework

full rationale

The paper's chain consists of (i) constructing improved initial-scale inputs for heavy-quark fragmentation channels in the PQ5Q1.0 sets, (ii) completing the P_{5c} and P_{5b} functions, and (iii) feeding them into the data-validated (sym)JETHAD framework to obtain NLL/NLO+ rates. No quoted equation or step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose validity is internal to the present work. The leading-power fragmentation assumption is stated as an approximation whose domain of validity is left for future checks, but this is not a circularity pattern. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract supplies insufficient detail to identify concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; typical fragmentation functions involve fitted initial-scale inputs, but none are specified here.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fully Heavy Pentaquarks with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.13769

@misc{pith2026260413769,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fully Heavy Pentaquarks with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.13769}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.13769}
}

abstract

We examine the leading-power fragmentation of fully heavy pentaquarks in high-energy hadronic collisions. To this end, we complete the release of the hadron-structure-oriented PQ5Q1.0 fragmentation functions, by discussing the $P_{5c}$ set and delivering the $P_{5b}$ one. These functions incorporate an improved computation of the initial-scale input for the constituent heavy-quark fragmentation channel, making them particularly suitable for describing both the direct formation of a compact multicharm state and the hadronization from a diquark-antiquark-diquark configuration. For phenomenological applications, we employ the data-validated (sym)JETHAD framework to compute and analyze NLL/NLO$^+$ semi-inclusive production rates of pentaquark-plus-jet systems at the upcoming HL-LHC and the future FCC. This study marks a further step toward connecting hadronic structure, precision QCD, and the emerging physics of exotic matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13769 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Representative leading-order diagrams for the initial-scale collinear fragmentation of a constituent heavy antiquark into a color-singlet 𝑆-wave 𝑃5𝑄 state within the direct multiquark scenario. The nonperturbative hadronization component of the corresponding FFs is depicted by blue ovals. Diagrams produced using JaxoDraw 2.0 [239]. Page 45 of 44 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Representative leading-order diagrams for the initial-scale collinear fragmentation of a constituent heavy antiquark into a color-singlet 𝑆-wave 𝑃5𝑄 pentaquark in the scalar-diquark scenario. Double lines denote (𝑄𝑄) or (𝑄̄𝑄̄) heavy-diquark configurations, while black dots represent effective gluon-diquark-antidiquark interaction vertices. The nonperturbative hadronization stage of the associated FFs is indicated … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Constituent heavy-quark to 𝑃5𝑐 (left) and 𝑃5𝑏 (right) initial-scale fragmentation channels in the direct (upper) and scalar-diquark (lower) picture. For the sake of illustration, an expanded diagonal DGLAP evolution is performed in the range 𝜇𝐹 ,0∕4 to 4𝜇𝐹 ,0 . Page 47 of 44 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Factorization-scale dependence of the PQ5Q1.0 NLO FFs portraying the ZM-VFNS fragmentation of 𝑃5𝑐 (left) and 𝑃5𝑏 (right) pentaquarks within direct (upper) or scalar-diquark (bottom) initial-scale inputs. The hadron momentum fraction is set to 𝑧 = 0.425 ≃ ⟨𝑧⟩. Page 48 o…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Upper plots: factorization-scale dependence of the TQHL1.1 NLO FFs [126] portraying the ZM-VFNS fragmentation of 𝑋𝑐𝑠 ̄𝑐 ̄𝑠 (left) and 𝑋𝑏𝑠𝑏 ̄𝑠̄ (right) tetraquarks. Lower plots: factorization-scale dependence of the TQ4Q1.1 NLO FFs [222, 223] portraying the ZM-VFNS frag…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Sketch of the pentaquark + jet semi-inclusive hadroproduction within NLL∕NLO+ factorization (diagram made with JaxoDraw 2.0 [239]). Red ovals portray collinear PDFs. The off-shell vertex, part of the hadron (jet) emission function, is depicted by green (blue) blobs. Pe…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Rapidity-interval rates for the semi-inclusive production of 𝑃5𝑏 plus jet systems at √ 𝑠 = 14 TeV (HL-LHC, left) and 100 TeV (nominal FCC, right). The first set of ancillary panels beneath the main plots displays the ratio between LL∕LO and NLL∕NLO+ predictions. The se…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Transverse-momentum rates for the semi-inclusive production of 𝑃5𝑏 plus jet systems at √ 𝑠 = 14 TeV (HL-LHC, left) and 100 TeV (nominal FCC, right), and for 2 < Δ𝑌 < 4 (lower) or 4 < Δ𝑌 < 6 (lower). The first set of ancillary panels beneath the main plots displays the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

All-charm tetraquarks at hadron colliders: A high-precision fragmentation perspective
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.5 of 10

TQ4Q2.0 supplies the first complete, uncertainty-quantified set of NRQCD-based fragmentation functions for all-heavy tetraquarks, including nonconstituent channels and public grids for jet-associated production.
Multimodal Fragmentation of All-Heavy Pentaquarks: Uncertainty-Aware Predictions for Hadron Colliders
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Develops uncertainty-aware fragmentation functions PQ5Q1.1 for all-charm pentaquarks using multimodal perturbative and nonperturbative modeling for collider predictions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Apollinari, O

G. Apollinari, O. Brüning, T. Nakamoto, L. Rossi, High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. (5) (2015) 1–19. arXiv:1705.08830,doi:10.5170/CERN-2015-005.1

work page doi:10.5170/cern-2015-005.1 2015
[2]

High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) : Preliminary Design Reportdoi:10.5170/CERN-2015-005

work page doi:10.5170/cern-2015-005 2015
[3]

Apollinari, I

High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical Design Report V. 0.1 4/2017.doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-004

work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-004 2017
[4]

Chapon, et al., Prospects for quarkonium studies at the high-luminosity LHC, Prog

E. Chapon, et al., Prospects for quarkonium studies at the high-luminosity LHC, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 122 (2022) 103906.arXiv: 2012.14161,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103906

work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103906 2022
[5]

R.AbdulKhalek,etal.,ScienceRequirementsandDetectorConceptsfortheElectron-IonCollider:EICYellowReport,Nucl.Phys.A1026 (2022) 122447.arXiv:2103.05419,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 2022
[6]

Abdul Khalek et al

R. Abdul Khalek, et al., Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Electron Ion Collider for High Energy Physics, in: 2022 Snowmass Summer Study, 2022.arXiv:2203.13199

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Hentschinski, et al., White Paper on Forward Physics, BFKL, Saturation Physics and Diffraction, Acta Phys

M. Hentschinski, et al., White Paper on Forward Physics, BFKL, Saturation Physics and Diffraction, Acta Phys. Polon. B 54 (3) (2023) 2. arXiv:2203.08129,doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.54.3-A2

work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.54.3-a2 2023
[8]

Snowmass 2021 Whitepaper: Proton Structure at the Precision Frontier

S. Amoroso, et al., Snowmass 2021 whitepaper: Proton structure at the precision frontier, Acta Phys. Polon. B 53 (12) (2022) A1. arXiv:2203.13923,doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.53.12-A1

work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.53.12-a1 2021

Show all 299 references

[9]

Abir, et al., The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EICarXiv:2305.14572

R. Abir, et al., The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EICarXiv:2305.14572
[10]

Allaire, et al., Artificial Intelligence for the Electron Ion Collider (AI4EIC), Comput

C. Allaire, et al., Artificial Intelligence for the Electron Ion Collider (AI4EIC), Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 5.arXiv:2307.08593, doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00113-4

2024 doi
[11]

Abada, et al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1, Eur

A. Abada, et al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (6) (2019) 474.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6904-3

2019 doi
[12]

A.Abada,etal.,FCC-ee:TheLeptonCollider:FutureCircularColliderConceptualDesignReportVolume2,Eur.Phys.J.ST228(2)(2019) 261–623.doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900045-4

2019 doi
[13]

A.Abada,etal.,FCC-hh:TheHadronCollider:FutureCircularColliderConceptualDesignReportVolume3,Eur.Phys.J.ST228(4)(2019) 755–1107.doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900087-0

2019 doi
[14]

Abada, et al., HE-LHC: The High-Energy Large Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 4, Eur

A. Abada, et al., HE-LHC: The High-Energy Large Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 4, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (5) (2019) 1109–1382.doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900088-6

2019 doi
[15]

Benedikt, et al., Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors, Eur

M. Benedikt, et al., Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (12) (2025) 1468.arXiv:2505.00272,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15077-x. Page 25 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint

2025 doi
[16]

M.Benedikt,etal.,FutureCircularColliderFeasibilityStudyReport:Volume2,Accelerators,TechnicalInfrastructureandSafety,Eur.Phys. J. ST 234 (19) (2025) 5713–6197.arXiv:2505.00274,doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01967-4

2025 doi
[17]

Benedikt, et al., Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 3, Civil Engineering, Implementation and Sustainability, Eur

M. Benedikt, et al., Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 3, Civil Engineering, Implementation and Sustainability, Eur. Phys. J. ST 234 (17) (2025) 5113–5383, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.ST None, (2025)].arXiv:2505.00273,doi:10.1140/epjs/ s11734-025-01958-5

2025 doi
[18]

Gell-Mann, Symmetries of baryons and mesons, Phys

M. Gell-Mann, Symmetries of baryons and mesons, Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) 1067–1084.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.125.1067

1962 doi
[19]

Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 214–215.doi:10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3

1964 doi
[20]

Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 2, 1964, pp. 22–101

1964
[21]

Fritzsch, M

H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, H. Leutwyler, Advantages of the Color Octet Gluon Picture, Phys. Lett. B 47 (1973) 365–368.doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(73)90625-4

1973 doi
[22]

R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.38.1440

1977
[23]

R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1791

1977 doi
[24]

R. D. Peccei, The Strong CP problem and axions, Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (2008) 3–17.arXiv:hep-ph/0607268,doi:10.1007/ 978-3-540-73518-2_1

2008
[25]

L. D. Duffy, K. van Bibber, Axions as Dark Matter Particles, New J. Phys. 11 (2009) 105008.arXiv:0904.3346,doi:10.1088/ 1367-2630/11/10/105008

2009
[26]

Forestell, D

L. Forestell, D. E. Morrissey, K. Sigurdson, Cosmological Bounds on Non-Abelian Dark Forces, Phys. Rev. D 97 (7) (2018) 075029. arXiv:1710.06447,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.075029

2018 doi
[27]

Huang, M

W.-C. Huang, M. Reichert, F. Sannino, Z.-W. Wang, Testing the dark SU(N) Yang-Mills theory confined landscape: From the lattice to gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 104 (3) (2021) 035005.arXiv:2012.11614,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.035005

2021 doi
[28]

McLerran, R

L. McLerran, R. D. Pisarski, Phases of cold, dense quarks at large N(c), Nucl. Phys. A 796 (2007) 83–100.arXiv:0706.2191, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.08.013

2007 doi
[29]

Y.Hidaka,L.D.McLerran,R.D.Pisarski,Baryonsandthephasediagramforalargenumberofcolorsandflavors,Nucl.Phys.A808(2008) 117–123.arXiv:0803.0279,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.05.009

2008 doi
[30]

McLerran, S

L. McLerran, S. Reddy, Quarkyonic Matter and Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (12) (2019) 122701.arXiv:1811.12503,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.122701

2019 doi
[31]

Buchmuller, D

W. Buchmuller, D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621–653. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90262-2

1986 doi
[32]

Witten, Baryons in the 1/n Expansion, Nucl

E. Witten, Baryons in the 1/n Expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 57–115.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90232-3

1979 doi
[33]

J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, C. E. Thomas, Toward the excited meson spectrum of dynamical QCD, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 034508.arXiv:1004.4930,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.034508

2010 doi
[34]

S. S. Afonin, The effect of higher dimensional QCD operators on the spectroscopy of bottom-up holographic models, Universe 7 (4) (2021) 102.arXiv:1905.13086,doi:10.3390/universe7040102

2021 doi
[35]

J. E. Augustin, et al., Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in𝑒+𝑒− Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 1406–1408.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.33.1406

1974
[37]

Bacci, et al., Preliminary Result of Frascati (ADONE) on the Nature of a New 3.1-GeV Particle Produced in e+ e- Annihilation, Phys

C. Bacci, et al., Preliminary Result of Frascati (ADONE) on the Nature of a New 3.1-GeV Particle Produced in e+ e- Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 1408, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 33, 1649 (1974)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1408

1974 doi
[38]

Close, Glueballs and exotic matter, Nature 349 (1991) 368–369.doi:10.1038/349368a0

F. Close, Glueballs and exotic matter, Nature 349 (1991) 368–369.doi:10.1038/349368a0

1991 doi
[39]

F. E. Close, Glueballs and hybrids: New states of matter, Contemp. Phys. 38 (1997) 1–12.doi:10.1080/001075197182522

1997 doi
[40]

F. E. Close, Glueballs and the pomeron: A central mystery, in: 33rd Rencontres de Moriond: QCD and High-Energy Hadronic Interactions, 1998, pp. 589–602

1998
[41]

Minkowski, W

P. Minkowski, W. Ochs, Identification of the glueballs and the scalar meson nonet of lowest mass, Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 283–312. arXiv:hep-ph/9811518,doi:10.1007/s100520050533

1999 doi
[42]

F. E. Close, Glueballs: A Central mystery, Acta Phys. Polon. B 31 (2000) 2557–2565.arXiv:hep-ph/0006288

2000
[43]

Mathieu, N

V. Mathieu, N. Kochelev, V. Vento, The Physics of Glueballs, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 18 (2009) 1–49.arXiv:0810.4453,doi:10.1142/ S0218301309012124

2009
[44]

Y. K. Hsiao, C. Q. Geng, Identifying Glueball at 3.02 GeV in Baryonic𝐵Decays, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 168–171.arXiv:1302.3331, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.008

2013 doi
[45]

V. M. Abazov, et al., Odderon Exchange from Elastic Scattering Differences between𝑝𝑝and𝑝 ̄ 𝑝Data at 1.96 TeV and from pp Forward Scattering Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (6) (2021) 062003.arXiv:2012.03981,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.062003

2021 doi
[46]

Csörgő, T

T. Csörgő, T. Novak, R. Pasechnik, A. Ster, I. Szanyi, Evidence of Odderon-exchange from scaling properties of elastic scattering at TeV energies, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2) (2021) 180.arXiv:1912.11968,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08867-6

2021 doi
[47]

R. L. Jaffe, Multi-Quark Hadrons. 1. The Phenomenology of (2 Quark 2 anti-Quark) Mesons, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 267.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.267

1977 doi
[48]

R. L. Jaffe, Multi-Quark Hadrons. 2. Methods, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 281.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.281

1977 doi
[49]

J. P. Ader, J. M. Richard, P. Taxil, DO NARROW HEAVY MULTI - QUARK STATES EXIST?, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 2370.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2370

1982 doi
[50]

S. K. Choi, et al., Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive𝐵± →𝐾 ±𝜋+𝜋−𝐽∕𝜓decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262001.arXiv:hep-ex/0309032,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001. Page 26 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint

2003 doi
[51]

Aaij, et al., A model-independent study of resonant structure in𝐵+ →𝐷 +𝐷−𝐾 + decays, Phys

R. Aaij, et al., A model-independent study of resonant structure in𝐵+ →𝐷 +𝐷−𝐾 + decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 242001. arXiv:2009.00025,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.242001

2020 doi
[52]

N. A. Tornqvist, From the deuteron to deusons, an analysis of deuteron - like meson meson bound states, Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 525–537. arXiv:hep-ph/9310247,doi:10.1007/BF01413192

1994 doi
[53]

Braaten, M

E. Braaten, M. Kusunoki, Low-energy universality and the new charmonium resonance at 3870-MeV, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 074005. arXiv:hep-ph/0311147,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.074005

2004 doi
[54]

E.Braaten,H.-W.Hammer,T.Mehen,ScatteringofanUltrasoftPionandtheX(3872),Phys.Rev.D82(2010)034018.arXiv:1005.1688, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.034018

2010 doi
[55]

E.Braaten,L.-P.He,K.Ingles,J.Jiang,Charm-mesontrianglesingularityin𝑒 +𝑒− annihilationinto𝐷 ∗0 ̄𝐷0 +𝛾,Phys.Rev.D101(9)(2020) 096020.arXiv:2004.12841,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.096020

2020 doi
[56]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, M. P. Valderrama, Consequences of Heavy Quark Symmetries for Hadronic Molecules, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 054007.arXiv:1303.6608,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.054007

2013 doi
[57]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, M. P. Valderrama, Heavy-antiquark–diquark symmetry and heavy hadron molecules: Are there triply heavy pentaquarks?, Phys. Rev. D 88 (5) (2013) 054014.arXiv:1305.4052,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.054014

2013 doi
[58]

Cleven, F.-K

M. Cleven, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, Employing spin symmetry to disentangle different models for the XYZ states, Phys. Rev. D 92 (1) (2015) 014005.arXiv:1505.01771,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.014005

2015 doi
[59]

Fleming, R

S. Fleming, R. Hodges, T. Mehen,𝑇 + 𝑐𝑐 decays: Differential spectra and two-body final states, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) (2021) 116010. arXiv:2109.02188,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.116010

2021 doi
[60]

L. Dai, S. Fleming, R. Hodges, T. Mehen, Strong decays of Tcc+ at NLO in an effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 107 (7) (2023) 076001. arXiv:2301.11950,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.076001

2023 doi
[61]

Fleming, M

S. Fleming, M. Kusunoki, T. Mehen, U. van Kolck, Pion interactions in the𝑋(3872), Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 034006.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0703168,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034006

2007 doi
[62]

Fleming, T

S. Fleming, T. Mehen, Hadronic Decays of the X(3872) to chi(cJ) in Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 094019.arXiv: 0807.2674,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.094019

2008 doi
[63]

Fleming, T

S. Fleming, T. Mehen, The decay of the𝑋(3872)into𝜒𝑐𝐽 and the Operator Product Expansion in XEFT, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 014016. arXiv:1110.0265,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.014016

2012 doi
[64]

arXiv:1503.02719,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034019

T.Mehen,Hadronicloopsversusfactorizationineffectivefieldtheorycalculationsof𝑋(3872)→𝜒 𝑐𝐽 𝜋0,Phys.Rev.D92(3)(2015)034019. arXiv:1503.02719,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034019

2015 doi
[65]

Mutuk, Molecular interpretation of X(3960) as𝐷 + 𝑠 𝐷− 𝑠 state, Eur

H. Mutuk, Molecular interpretation of X(3960) as𝐷 + 𝑠 𝐷− 𝑠 state, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (12) (2022) 1142.arXiv:2211.14836,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11120-3

2022 doi
[66]

Z.-G.Wang,AnalysisoftheHidden-charmTetraquarkmoleculemassspectrumwiththeQCDsumrules,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A36(15)(2021) 2150107.arXiv:2012.11869,doi:10.1142/S0217751X21501074

2021 doi
[67]

Z.-G.Wang,T.Huang,Possibleassignmentsofthe𝑋(3872),𝑍 𝑐 (3900)and𝑍 𝑏(10610)asaxial-vectormolecularstates,Eur.Phys.J.C74(5) (2014) 2891.arXiv:1312.7489,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2891-6

2014 doi
[68]

arXiv:2108.12597,doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00752-4

Q.Xin,Z.-G.Wang,Analysisofthedoubly-charmedtetraquarkmolecularstateswiththeQCDsumrules,Eur.Phys.J.A58(6)(2022)110. arXiv:2108.12597,doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00752-4

2022 doi
[69]

Wang, Landau equation and QCD sum rules for the tetraquark molecular states, Phys

Z.-G. Wang, Landau equation and QCD sum rules for the tetraquark molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) (2020) 074011.arXiv: 2001.04095,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074011

2020 doi
[70]

Wang, Reanalysis of the𝑌(3940),𝑌(4140),𝑍 𝑐 (4020),𝑍 𝑐 (4025)and𝑍 𝑏(10650)as molecular states with QCD sum rules, Eur

Z.-G. Wang, Reanalysis of the𝑌(3940),𝑌(4140),𝑍 𝑐 (4020),𝑍 𝑐 (4025)and𝑍 𝑏(10650)as molecular states with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (7) (2014) 2963.arXiv:1403.0810,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2963-7

2014 doi
[71]

Maiani, F

L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, V. Riquer, Diquark-antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 014028.arXiv:hep-ph/0412098,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.014028

2005 doi
[72]

G.’tHooft,G.Isidori,L.Maiani,A.D.Polosa,V.Riquer,ATheoryofScalarMesons,Phys.Lett.B662(2008)424–430.arXiv:0801.2288, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.03.036

2008 doi
[73]

Maiani, V

L. Maiani, V. Riquer, R. Faccini, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, A𝐽𝑃 𝐺 = 1 ++ Charged Resonance in the𝑌(4260)→𝜋 +𝜋−𝐽∕𝜓 Decay?, Phys. Rev. D 87 (11) (2013) 111102.arXiv:1303.6857,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.111102

2013 doi
[74]

Maiani, F

L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, V. Riquer, The Z(4430) and a New Paradigm for Spin Interactions in Tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 114010.arXiv:1405.1551,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.114010

2014 doi
[75]

Maiani, A

L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, V. Riquer, A Theory of X and Z Multiquark Resonances, Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 247–251.arXiv:1712.05296, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.039

2018 doi
[76]

Mutuk, Nonrelativistic treatment of fully-heavy tetraquarks as diquark-antidiquark states, Eur

H. Mutuk, Nonrelativistic treatment of fully-heavy tetraquarks as diquark-antidiquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (4) (2021) 367.arXiv: 2104.11823,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09176-8

2021 doi
[77]

Mutuk, The status ofΞ++ cc baryon: investigating quark–diquark model, Eur

H. Mutuk, The status ofΞ++ cc baryon: investigating quark–diquark model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (1) (2022) 10.arXiv:2112.06205, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02256-4

2022 doi
[78]

Mutuk, K

H. Mutuk, K. Azizi, Investigation ofΔ0Δ0 dibaryon in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 105 (9) (2022) 094021.arXiv:2204.03050,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.094021

2022
[79]

Mutuk, Spectrum of𝑐𝑐̄𝑏̄𝑏,𝑏𝑐 ̄ 𝑐 ̄ 𝑐, and𝑏𝑐̄𝑏̄𝑏tetraquark states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys

H. Mutuk, Spectrum of𝑐𝑐̄𝑏̄𝑏,𝑏𝑐 ̄ 𝑐 ̄ 𝑐, and𝑏𝑐̄𝑏̄𝑏tetraquark states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137404.arXiv: 2208.11048,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137404

2022 doi
[80]

Wang, Decipher the width of the X(3872) via the QCD sum rules, Phys

Z.-G. Wang, Decipher the width of the X(3872) via the QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) (2024) 014017.arXiv:2310.02030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014017

2024 doi
[81]

Wang, Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass spectrum with the QCD sum rules, Phys

Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass spectrum with the QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 102 (1) (2020) 014018. arXiv:1908.07914,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014018. Page 27 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint

2020 doi
[82]

Z.-G. Wang, T. Huang, Analysis of the𝑋(3872),𝑍𝑐 (3900)and𝑍 𝑐 (3885)as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 89 (5) (2014) 054019.arXiv:1310.2422,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.054019

2014 doi
[83]

63 (4) (2015) 466–480.arXiv:1312.1537,doi:10.1088/0253-6102/63/4/466

Z.-G.Wang,Reanalysisofthe𝑍 𝑐 (4020),𝑍 𝑐 (4025),𝑍(4050)and𝑍(4250)astetraquarkstateswithQCDsumrules,Commun.Theor.Phys. 63 (4) (2015) 466–480.arXiv:1312.1537,doi:10.1088/0253-6102/63/4/466

2015 doi
[84]

Wang, Analysis of the𝑍𝑐 (4020),𝑍 𝑐 (4025),𝑌(4360)and𝑌(4660)as vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur

Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the𝑍𝑐 (4020),𝑍 𝑐 (4025),𝑌(4360)and𝑌(4660)as vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (5) (2014) 2874.arXiv:1311.1046,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2874-7

2014 doi
[85]

2008.07.086

S.Dubynskiy,M.B.Voloshin,Hadro-Charmonium,Phys.Lett.B666(2008)344–346.arXiv:0803.2224,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2008.07.086

2008 doi
[86]

Dubynskiy, A

S. Dubynskiy, A. Gorsky, M. B. Voloshin, Holographic Hadro-Quarkonium, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 82–86.arXiv:0804.2244, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.040

2009 doi
[87]

X.Li,M.B.Voloshin,𝑌(4260)and𝑌(4360)asmixedhadrocharmonium,Mod.Phys.Lett.A29(12)(2014)1450060.arXiv:1309.1681, doi:10.1142/S0217732314500606

2014 doi
[88]

M.B.Voloshin,𝑍 𝑐 (3900)-whatisinside?,Phys.Rev.D87(9)(2013)091501.arXiv:1304.0380,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.091501

2013 doi
[89]

94, 029901 (2022)].arXiv:1705.00141,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004

F.-K.Guo,C.Hanhart,U.-G.Meißner,Q.Wang,Q.Zhao,B.-S.Zou,Hadronicmolecules,Rev.Mod.Phys.90(1)(2018)015004,[Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)].arXiv:1705.00141,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004

2018 doi
[90]

Ferretti, E

J. Ferretti, E. Santopinto, M. Naeem Anwar, M. A. Bedolla, The baryo-quarkonium picture for hidden-charm and bottom pentaquarks and LHCb𝑃 c(4380)and𝑃 c(4450)states,Phys.Lett.B789(2019)562–567.arXiv:1807.01207,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.09.047

2019 doi
[91]

Ferretti, E

J. Ferretti, E. Santopinto, Threshold corrections of𝜒𝑐 (2 P ) and𝜒𝑏 (3 P ) states and J /𝜓𝜌and J /𝜓𝜔transitions of the𝜒(3872) in a coupled-channel model, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 550–555.arXiv:1806.02489,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.052

2019 doi
[92]

J.Ferretti,E.Santopinto,Hidden-charmandbottomtetra-andpentaquarkswithstrangenessinthehadro-quarkoniumandcompacttetraquark models, JHEP 04 (2020) 119.arXiv:2001.01067,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)119

2020 doi
[93]

Hayrapetyan, et al., New Structures in the J/𝜓J/𝜓Mass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys

A. Hayrapetyan, et al., New Structures in the J/𝜓J/𝜓Mass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (11) (2024) 111901.arXiv:2306.07164,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.111901

2024 doi
[94]

A.Hayrapetyan,etal.,Determinationofthespinandparityofall-charmtetraquarks,Nature648(8092)(2025)58–63.arXiv:2506.07944, doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09711-7

2025 doi
[95]

Ablikim, et al., Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in𝑒+𝑒− →𝜋 +𝜋−𝐽∕𝜓at √ 𝑠=4.26 GeV, Phys

M. Ablikim, et al., Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in𝑒+𝑒− →𝜋 +𝜋−𝐽∕𝜓at √ 𝑠=4.26 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252001.arXiv:1303.5949,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252001

2013 doi
[96]

111, 019901 (2013)].arXiv:1304.0121,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252002

Z.Q.Liu,etal.,Studyof𝑒 +𝑒−π𝜋+𝜋−𝐽∕𝜓andObservationofaChargedCharmoniumlikeStateatBelle,Phys.Rev.Lett.110(2013)252002, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 019901 (2013)].arXiv:1304.0121,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252002

2013 doi
[97]

Nakano, et al., Evidence for a narrow S = +1 baryon resonance in photoproduction from the neutron, Phys

T. Nakano, et al., Evidence for a narrow S = +1 baryon resonance in photoproduction from the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 012002. arXiv:hep-ex/0301020,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.012002

2003 doi
[98]

V. V. Barmin, et al., Observation of a baryon resonance with positive strangeness in K+ collisions with Xe nuclei, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 66 (2003) 1715–1718.arXiv:hep-ex/0304040,doi:10.1134/1.1611587

2003 doi
[99]

Diakonov, V

D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, M. V. Polyakov, Exotic anti-decuplet of baryons: Prediction from chiral solitons, Z. Phys. A 359 (1997) 305–314. arXiv:hep-ph/9703373,doi:10.1007/s002180050406

1997 doi
[100]

Battaglieri, et al., Search for Theta+(1540) pentaquark in high statistics measurement of gamma p —>anti-K0 K+ n at CLAS, Phys

M. Battaglieri, et al., Search for Theta+(1540) pentaquark in high statistics measurement of gamma p —>anti-K0 K+ n at CLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 042001.arXiv:hep-ex/0510061,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.042001

2006 doi
[101]

K. H. Hicks, Experimental search for pentaquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 55 (2005) 647–676.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.07.001

2005 doi
[102]

Amsler, et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys

C. Amsler, et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Lett. B 667 (2008) 1–1340.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018

2008 doi
[103]

Praszalowicz, Odyssey of the elusiveΘ+arXiv:2411.08429

M. Praszalowicz, Odyssey of the elusiveΘ+arXiv:2411.08429
[104]

Aaij, et al., Observation of𝐽∕𝜓𝑝Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 𝑏 →𝐽∕𝜓𝐾 −𝑝Decays, Phys

R. Aaij, et al., Observation of𝐽∕𝜓𝑝Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 𝑏 →𝐽∕𝜓𝐾 −𝑝Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 072001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001

2015 doi
[105]

R.Aaij,etal.,Observationofanarrowpentaquarkstate,𝑃 𝑐 (4312)+,andoftwo-peakstructureofthe𝑃 𝑐 (4450)+,Phys.Rev.Lett.122(2019) 222001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222001

2019 doi
[106]

Aaij, et al., Evidence of a𝐽∕𝜓Λstructure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− 𝑏 →𝐽∕𝜓Λ𝐾 − decay, Sci

R. Aaij, et al., Evidence of a𝐽∕𝜓Λstructure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− 𝑏 →𝐽∕𝜓Λ𝐾 − decay, Sci. Bull. 66 (2021) 1278–1287.arXiv:2012.10380,doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.030

2021 doi
[107]

Aaij, et al., Observation of a𝐽∕𝜓ΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in𝐵−𝐽∕𝜓Λ̄ 𝑝Decays, Phys

R. Aaij, et al., Observation of a𝐽∕𝜓ΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in𝐵−𝐽∕𝜓Λ̄ 𝑝Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (3) (2023) 031901.arXiv:2210.10346,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.031901

2023 doi
[108]

Aaij, et al., Evidence for exotic hadron contributions toΛ0 𝑏 →𝐽∕𝜓𝑝𝜋 − decays, Phys

R. Aaij, et al., Evidence for exotic hadron contributions toΛ0 𝑏 →𝐽∕𝜓𝑝𝜋 − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (8) (2016) 082003, [Addendum: Phys.Rev.Lett.117,109902(2016),Addendum:Phys.Rev.Lett.118,119901(2017)].arXiv:1606.06999,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 117.082003

2016 doi
[109]

arXiv:2108.04720,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.062001

R.Aaij,etal.,Evidenceforanewstructureinthe𝐽∕𝜓𝑝and𝐽∕𝜓 ̄ 𝑝systemsin𝐵 0 𝑠 →𝐽∕𝜓𝑝 ̄ 𝑝decays,Phys.Rev.Lett.128(6)(2022)062001. arXiv:2108.04720,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.062001

2022 doi
[110]

Maciuła, W

R. Maciuła, W. Schäfer, A. Szczurek, On the mechanism of𝑇4𝑐(6900) tetraquark production, Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021) 136010.arXiv: 2009.02100,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136010

2021 doi
[111]

Karliner, S

M. Karliner, S. Nussinov, J. L. Rosner,𝑄𝑄̄𝑄 ̄𝑄states: masses, production, and decays, Phys. Rev. D 95 (3) (2017) 034011.arXiv: 1611.00348,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034011

2017 doi
[112]

Becchi, A

C. Becchi, A. Giachino, L. Maiani, E. Santopinto, Search for𝑏𝑏̄𝑏̄𝑏tetraquark decays in 4 muons,𝐵+𝐵−,𝐵 0 ̄𝐵0 and𝐵 0 𝑠 ̄𝐵0 𝑠 channels at LHC, Phys. Lett. B 806 (2020) 135495.arXiv:2002.11077,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135495

2020 doi
[113]

A.Francis,R.J.Hudspith,R.Lewis,K.Maltman,Evidenceforcharm-bottomtetraquarksandthemassdependenceofheavy-lighttetraquark states from lattice QCD (2019).arXiv:1810.10550,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.054505

2019 doi
[114]

Leskovec, S

L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, M. Wagner, Lattice QCD investigation of a doubly-bottom̄𝑏̄𝑏𝑢𝑑tetraquark with quantum numbers 𝐼(𝐽 𝑃 ) = 0(1 +), Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) (2019) 014503.arXiv:1904.04197,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014503. Page 28 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJe...

2019 doi
[115]

Liu, Y.-W

M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, F.-Z. Peng, M. Sánchez Sánchez, L.-S. Geng, A. Hosaka, M. Pavon Valderrama, Emergence of a complete heavy- quark spin symmetry multiplet: seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (24) (2019) 242001. arXiv:1903...

2019 doi
[116]

Bicudo, Tetraquarks and pentaquarks in lattice QCD with light and heavy quarks, Phys

P. Bicudo, Tetraquarks and pentaquarks in lattice QCD with light and heavy quarks, Phys. Rept. 1039 (2023) 1–49.arXiv:2212.07793, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.10.001

2023 doi
[117]

C.Alexandrou,J.Finkenrath,T.Leontiou,S.Meinel,M.Pflaumer,M.Wagner, ̄𝑏̄𝑏𝑢𝑑and ̄𝑏̄𝑏𝑢𝑠tetraquarksfromlatticeQCDusingsymmetric correlation matrices with both local and scattering interpolating operators, Phys. Rev. D 110 (5) (2024) 054510.arXiv:2404.03588, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.054510

2024 doi
[118]

Prelovsek, Spectroscopy of hadrons with heavy quarks from lattice QCD, Nuovo Cim

S. Prelovsek, Spectroscopy of hadrons with heavy quarks from lattice QCD, Nuovo Cim. C 47 (4) (2024) 147.arXiv:2310.07341, doi:10.1393/ncc/i2024-24147-3

2024 doi
[119]

C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, E. Oset, Heavy quark spin symmetric molecular states from̄𝐷(∗)Σ(∗) 𝑐 and other coupled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) (2019) 014021.arXiv:1904.01296,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014021

2019 doi
[120]

A.Ali,J.S.Lange,S.Stone,Exotics:HeavyPentaquarksandTetraquarks,Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.97(2017)123–198.arXiv:1706.00610, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003

2017 doi
[121]

Yamaguchi, A

Y. Yamaguchi, A. Giachino, A. Hosaka, E. Santopinto, S. Takeuchi, M. Takizawa, Hidden-charm and bottom meson-baryon molecules coupled with five-quark states, Phys. Rev. D 96 (11) (2017) 114031.arXiv:1709.00819,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.114031

2017 doi
[122]

Pineda, Review of Heavy Quarkonium at weak coupling, Prog

A. Pineda, Review of Heavy Quarkonium at weak coupling, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 735–785.arXiv:1111.0165,doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.01.038

2012 doi
[123]

S.Chatrchyan,etal.,Measurementofthe𝑋(3872)ProductionCrossSectionViaDecaysto𝐽∕𝜓𝜋 +𝜋− in𝑝𝑝collisionsat √ 𝑠=7TeV,JHEP 04 (2013) 154.arXiv:1302.3968,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)154

2013 doi
[124]

M.Aaboud,etal.,Measurementsof𝜓(2𝑆)and𝑋(3872)→𝐽∕𝜓𝜋 +𝜋− productionin𝑝𝑝collisionsat √ 𝑠= 8TeVwiththeATLASdetector, JHEP 01 (2017) 117.arXiv:1610.09303,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2017)117

2017 doi
[125]

Aaij, et al., Measurement of𝜒𝑐1(3872) production in proton-proton collisions at √ 𝑠= 8 and 13 TeV, JHEP 01 (2022) 131.arXiv: 2109.07360,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)131

R. Aaij, et al., Measurement of𝜒𝑐1(3872) production in proton-proton collisions at √ 𝑠= 8 and 13 TeV, JHEP 01 (2022) 131.arXiv: 2109.07360,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)131

2022 doi
[126]

arXiv:2412.10549,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.034037

F.G.Celiberto,G.Gatto,Bottomoniumlikestatesinprotoncollisions:Fragmentationandresummation,Phys.Rev.D111(3)(2025)034037. arXiv:2412.10549,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.034037

2025 doi
[127]

F. G. Celiberto, G. Gatto, TQHL1.1: TetraQuarks with Heavy and Light flavor collinear VFNS FFs, 2024. URLhttps://github.com/FGCeliberto/Collinear_FFs/

2024
[128]

F. G. Celiberto, TQ4Q1.1: TetraQuarks with 4 heavy Quarks VFNS FFs, 2024. URLhttps://github.com/FGCeliberto/Collinear_FFs/

2024
[129]

Suzuki, Fragmentation of Hadrons from Heavy Quark Partons, Phys

M. Suzuki, Fragmentation of Hadrons from Heavy Quark Partons, Phys. Lett. B 71 (1977) 139–141.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77) 90761-4

1977 doi
[130]

arXiv:2110.15251,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034001

S.M.MoosaviNejad,N.Amiri,Groundstateheavytetraquarkproductioninheavyquarkfragmentation,Phys.Rev.D105(3)(2022)034001. arXiv:2110.15251,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034001

2022 doi
[131]

D 106 (11) (2022) 114029.arXiv:2009.08450,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114029

F.Feng,Y.Huang,Y.Jia,W.-L.Sang,X.Xiong,J.-Y.Zhang,Fragmentationproductionoffully-charmedtetraquarksattheLHC,Phys.Rev. D 106 (11) (2022) 114029.arXiv:2009.08450,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114029

2022 doi
[132]

X.-W. Bai, F. Feng, C.-M. Gan, Y. Huang, W.-L. Sang, H.-F. Zhang, Producing fully-charmed tetraquarks via charm quark fragmentation in colliders, JHEP 09 (2024) 002.arXiv:2404.13889,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)002

2024 doi
[133]

F. G. Celiberto, Towards Quarkonium Fragmentation from NRQCD in a Variable-Flavor Number Scheme, in: 58th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, 2024.arXiv:2405.08221

2024
[134]

F. G. Celiberto, Quarkonium fragmentation in a variable-flavor number scheme: Towards NRFF1.0, PoS DIS2024 (2025) 168.arXiv: 2406.10779,doi:10.22323/1.469.0168

2025 doi
[135]

F. G. Celiberto, On the Quarkonium-in-jet Collinear Fragmentation at Moderate-to-large Transverse Momentum, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 18 (1) (2025) 1–A22.arXiv:2412.05661,doi:10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.18.1-A22

2025 doi
[136]

F. G. Celiberto, F. Lonigro, Heavy-Flavor Fragmentation and Jet Structure from HF-NRevo: Bridging to Heavy-Ion Collisions, PoS EPS- HEP2025 (2026) 191.arXiv:2510.22449,doi:10.22323/1.485.0191

2026 doi
[137]

Ma, Z.-K

H.-H. Ma, Z.-K. Tao, J.-J. Niu, Application of fragmentation function to the indirect production of fully charmed tetraquark, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (4) (2025) 397.arXiv:2502.20891,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14128-7

2025 doi
[138]

H. S. Nakhaei, G. R. Boroun, Analysis of the fragmentation function of gluon at next-to-leading order approximation, Phys. Rev. D 112 (5) (2025) 054039.arXiv:2508.05256,doi:10.1103/x9vl-d6pm

2025 doi
[139]

F. G. Celiberto, Heavy-flavor multimodal fragmentation to S-wave pentacharms at next-generation hadron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (12) (2025) 1395.arXiv:2502.11136,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15079-9

2025 doi
[140]

Sazdjian, The Interplay between Compact and Molecular Structures in Tetraquarks, Symmetry 14 (3) (2022) 515.arXiv:2202.01081, doi:10.3390/sym14030515

H. Sazdjian, The Interplay between Compact and Molecular Structures in Tetraquarks, Symmetry 14 (3) (2022) 515.arXiv:2202.01081, doi:10.3390/sym14030515

2022 doi
[141]

F. G. Celiberto, A. Papa, Mueller-Navelet jets at the LHC: Hunting data with azimuthal distributions, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) (2022) 114004. arXiv:2207.05015,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114004

2022 doi
[142]

F.G.Celiberto,G.Gatto,A.Papa,FullycharmedtetraquarksfromLHCtoFCC:naturalstabilityfromfragmentation,Eur.Phys.J.C84(10) (2024) 1071.arXiv:2405.14773,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13345-w

2024 doi
[143]

A.D.Bolognino,F.G.Celiberto,M.Fucilla,D.Yu.Ivanov,A.Papa,Inclusiveproductionofaheavy-lightdijetsysteminhybridhigh-energy and collinear factorization, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) (2021) 094004.arXiv:2103.07396,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094004

2021 doi
[144]

F. G. Celiberto, M. Fucilla, Diffractive semi-hard production of a𝐽∕𝜓or aΥfrom single-parton fragmentation plus a jet in hybrid factorization, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) (2022) 929.arXiv:2202.12227,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10818-8. Page 29 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJet...

2022 doi
[145]

F. G. Celiberto, F. Lonigro, Pseudoscalar heavy-quarkonium hadroproduction from nonrelativistic fragmentation at NLL/NLO+, Phys. Rev. D 112 (11) (2025) 114040.arXiv:2510.10593,doi:10.1103/rmsq-bq3b

2025 doi
[146]

W. R. Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.2, champaign, IL, 2024. URLhttps://www.wolfram.com/mathematica

2024
[147]

F. G. Celiberto, Hunting BFKL in semi-hard reactions at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (8) (2021) 691.arXiv:2008.07378,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09384-2

2021 doi
[148]

F.G.Celiberto,High-energyemissionsoflightmesonsplusheavyflavorattheLHCandtheForwardPhysicsFacility,Phys.Rev.D105(11) (2022) 114008.arXiv:2204.06497,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.114008

2022 doi
[149]

F. G. Celiberto, Vector Quarkonia at the LHC with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint, Universe 9 (7) (2023) 324.arXiv:2305.14295, doi:10.3390/universe9070324

2023 doi
[150]

F. G. Celiberto, Exotic Tetraquarks at the HL-LHC with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint, Symmetry 16 (5) (2024) 550.arXiv: 2403.15639,doi:10.3390/sym16050550

2024 doi
[151]

F. G. Celiberto, Forward & Far-Forward Heavy Hadrons with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint, Particles 7 (3) (2024) 502–542. arXiv:2405.09526,doi:10.3390/particles7030029

2024 doi
[152]

F. G. Celiberto, Triply HeavyΩBaryons with with JETHAD: A High-Energy Viewpoint, Symmetry 18 (1) (2026) 29.doi:10.3390/ sym18010029

2026
[153]

Cacciari, M

M. Cacciari, M. Greco, S. Rolli, A. Tanzini, Charmed mesons fragmentation functions, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 2736–2740.arXiv: hep-ph/9608213,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2736

1997 doi
[154]

Cacciari, M

M. Cacciari, M. Greco, Large𝑝 𝑇 hadroproduction of heavy quarks, Nucl. Phys. B 421 (1994) 530–544.arXiv:hep-ph/9311260, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90515-0

1994 doi
[155]

R. L. Jaffe, L. Randall, Heavy quark fragmentation into heavy mesons, Nucl. Phys. B 412 (1994) 79–105.arXiv:hep-ph/9306201, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90495-2

1994 doi
[156]

B.A.Kniehl,G.Kramer,I.Schienbein,H.Spiesberger,Collinearsubtractionsinhadroproductionofheavyquarks,Eur.Phys.J.C41(2005) 199–212.arXiv:hep-ph/0502194,doi:10.1140/epjc/s2005-02200-7

2005 doi
[157]

Helenius, H

I. Helenius, H. Paukkunen, Revisiting the D-meson hadroproduction in general-mass variable flavour number scheme, JHEP 05 (2018) 196. arXiv:1804.03557,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)196

2018 doi
[158]

Helenius, H

I. Helenius, H. Paukkunen, B-meson hadroproduction in the SACOT-m𝑇 scheme, JHEP 07 (2023) 054.arXiv:2303.17864,doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)054

2023 doi
[159]

Generet,𝐵-hadron production at higher orders in QCD, Ph.D

T. Generet,𝐵-hadron production at higher orders in QCD, Ph.D. thesis, RWTH Aachen University, RWTH Aachen U. (2023)

2023
[160]

B. Mele, P. Nason, Next-to-leading QCD calculation of the heavy quark fragmentation function, Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 635–639. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90704-A

1990 doi
[161]

B. Mele, P. Nason, The Fragmentation function for heavy quarks in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 361 (1991) 626–644, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 921, 841–842 (2017)].doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90597-Q

1991 doi
[162]

P. J. Rijken, W. L. van Neerven, O (alpha-s**2) contributions to the longitudinal fragmentation function in e+ e- annihilation, Phys. Lett. B 386 (1996) 422–428.arXiv:hep-ph/9604436,doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00898-2

1996 doi
[163]

Mitov, S.-O

A. Mitov, S.-O. Moch, QCD Corrections to Semi-Inclusive Hadron Production in Electron-Positron Annihilation at Two Loops, Nucl. Phys. B 751 (2006) 18–52.arXiv:hep-ph/0604160,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.05.018

2006 doi
[164]

Blumlein, V

J. Blumlein, V. Ravindran, O (alpha**2(s)) Timelike Wilson Coefficients for Parton-Fragmentation Functions in Mellin Space, Nucl. Phys. B 749 (2006) 1–24.arXiv:hep-ph/0604019,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.04.032

2006 doi
[165]

Melnikov, A

K. Melnikov, A. Mitov, Perturbative heavy quark fragmentation function through(𝛼2 𝑠 ), Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 034027.arXiv: hep-ph/0404143,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.034027

2004 doi
[166]

Mitov, Perturbative heavy quark fragmentation function through(𝛼2 𝑠 ): Gluon initiated contribution, Phys

A. Mitov, Perturbative heavy quark fragmentation function through(𝛼2 𝑠 ): Gluon initiated contribution, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 054021. arXiv:hep-ph/0410205,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.054021

2005 doi
[167]

Biello, L

C. Biello, L. Bonino, Time-Like heavy-flavour thresholds for fragmentation functions: the light-quark matching condition at NNLO, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (11) (2024) 1192.arXiv:2407.07623,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13532-9

2024 doi
[168]

Fickinger, S

M. Fickinger, S. Fleming, C. Kim, E. Mereghetti, Effective field theory approach to heavy quark fragmentation, JHEP 11 (2016) 095. arXiv:1606.07737,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)095

2016 doi
[169]

Maltoni, G

F. Maltoni, G. Ridolfi, M. Ubiali, M. Zaro, Resummation effects in the bottom-quark fragmentation function, JHEP 10 (2022) 027. arXiv:2207.10038,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)027

2022 doi
[170]

M. L. Czakon, T. Generet, A. Mitov, R. Poncelet, B-hadron production in NNLO QCD: application to LHC t𝑡events with leptonic decays, JHEP 10 (2021) 216.arXiv:2102.08267,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)216

2021 doi
[171]

M.Czakon,T.Generet,A.Mitov,R.Poncelet,NNLOB-fragmentationfitsandtheirapplicationto𝑡 𝑡productionanddecayattheLHC,JHEP 03 (2023) 251.arXiv:2210.06078,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)251

2023 doi
[172]

U.Aglietti,L.DiGiustino,G.Ferrera,A.Renzaglia,G.Ricciardi,L.Trentadue,ThresholdResummationinB—>X(c)lnu(l)Decays,Phys. Lett. B 653 (2007) 38–52.arXiv:0707.2010,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.07.041

2007 doi
[173]

U. G. Aglietti, G. Ferrera, Improved factorization for threshold resummation in heavy quark to heavy quark decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (4) (2023) 335.arXiv:2211.14397,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11440-y

2023 doi
[174]

Gaggero, A

D. Gaggero, A. Ghira, S. Marzani, G. Ridolfi, Soft logarithms in processes with heavy quarks, JHEP 09 (2022) 058.arXiv:2207.13567, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)058

2022 doi
[175]

Ghira, S

A. Ghira, S. Marzani, G. Ridolfi, A consistent resummation of mass and soft logarithms in processes with heavy flavours, JHEP 11 (2023) 120.arXiv:2309.06139,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)120

2023 doi
[176]

Bonino, M

L. Bonino, M. Cacciari, G. Stagnitto, Heavy quark fragmentation in e+e− collisions to NNLO+NNLL accuracy in perturbative QCD, JHEP 06 (2024) 040.arXiv:2312.12519,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)040. Page 30 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint

2024 doi
[177]

Cacciari, A

M. Cacciari, A. Ghira, S. Marzani, G. Ridolfi, An improved description of charm fragmentation data, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (9) (2024) 889. arXiv:2406.04173,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13245-z

2024 doi
[178]

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90653-6

V.Kartvelishvili,A.Likhoded,V.Petrov,OntheFragmentationFunctionsofHeavyQuarksIntoHadrons,Phys.Lett.B78(1978)615–617. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90653-6

1978 doi
[179]

M. G. Bowler, e+ e- Production of Heavy Quarks in the String Model, Z. Phys. C 11 (1981) 169.doi:10.1007/BF01574001

1981 doi
[180]

Peterson, D

C. Peterson, D. Schlatter, I. Schmitt, P. M. Zerwas, Scaling Violations in Inclusive e+ e- Annihilation Spectra, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.105

1983 doi
[181]

B.Andersson,G.Gustafson,B.Soderberg,AGeneralModelforJetFragmentation,Z.Phys.C20(1983)317.doi:10.1007/BF01407824

1983 doi
[182]

P. D. B. Collins, T. P. Spiller, The Fragmentation of Heavy Quarks, J. Phys. G 11 (1985) 1289.doi:10.1088/0305-4616/11/12/006

1985 doi
[183]

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91317-3

G.Colangelo,P.Nason,ATheoreticalstudyofthecandbfragmentationfunctionfrome+e-annihilation,Phys.Lett.B285(1992)167–171. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91317-3

1992 doi
[184]

H.Georgi,AnEffectiveFieldTheoryforHeavyQuarksatLow-energies,Phys.Lett.B240(1990)447–450.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90) 91128-X

1990 doi
[185]

Eichten, B

E. Eichten, B. R. Hill, An Effective Field Theory for the Calculation of Matrix Elements Involving Heavy Quarks, Phys. Lett. B 234 (1990) 511–516.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)92049-O

1990 doi
[186]

Grinstein, Light quark, heavy quark systems, Ann

B. Grinstein, Light quark, heavy quark systems, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 42 (1992) 101–145.doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.42.120192. 000533

1992 doi
[187]

Neubert, Heavy quark symmetry, Phys

M. Neubert, Heavy quark symmetry, Phys. Rept. 245 (1994) 259–396.arXiv:hep-ph/9306320,doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94) 90091-4

1994 doi
[188]

W. E. Caswell, G. P. Lepage, Effective Lagrangians for Bound State Problems in QED, QCD, and Other Field Theories, Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 437–442.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91297-9

1986 doi
[189]

B.A.Thacker,G.P.Lepage,HeavyquarkboundstatesinlatticeQCD,Phys.Rev.D43(1991)196–208.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.196

1991 doi
[190]

G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, G. P. Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1125–1171, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 55, 5853 (1997)].arXiv:hep-ph/9407339,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5853

1995 doi
[191]

P. L. Cho, A. K. Leibovich, Color octet quarkonia production, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 150–162.arXiv:hep-ph/9505329,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.150

1996 doi
[192]

P. L. Cho, A. K. Leibovich, Color octet quarkonia production. 2., Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6203–6217.arXiv:hep-ph/9511315, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.6203

1996 doi
[193]

A. K. Leibovich, Psi-prime polarization due to color octet quarkonia production, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 4412–4415.arXiv:hep-ph/ 9610381,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.4412

1997 doi
[194]

G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, J. Lee, Comparison of the color-evaporation model and the NRQCD factorization approach in charmonium production, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 014004.arXiv:hep-ph/0504014,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.014004

2005 doi
[195]

Grinstein, A Modern introduction to quarkonium theory, Int

B. Grinstein, A Modern introduction to quarkonium theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 461–496.arXiv:hep-ph/9811264,doi: 10.1142/S0217751X00000227

2000 doi
[196]

Krämer, Quarkonium production at high-energy colliders, Prog

M. Krämer, Quarkonium production at high-energy colliders, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47 (2001) 141–201.arXiv:hep-ph/0106120, doi:10.1016/S0146-6410(01)00154-5

2001 doi
[197]

Brambilla, et al., Heavy quarkonium physicsarXiv:hep-ph/0412158,doi:10.5170/CERN-2005-005

N. Brambilla, et al., Heavy quarkonium physicsarXiv:hep-ph/0412158,doi:10.5170/CERN-2005-005

2005 doi
[198]

J.-P.Lansberg,Quarkoniumproductionathigh-energyhadroncolliders:ASystematicgauge-invariantapproachtorelativisticeffectsof𝐽∕𝜓, 𝜓 ′ and𝜐production, Phd thesis, Liege University (4 2005).arXiv:hep-ph/0507175

2005
[199]

Lansberg, New Observables in Inclusive Production of Quarkonia, Phys

J.-P. Lansberg, New Observables in Inclusive Production of Quarkonia, Phys. Rept. 889 (2020) 1–106.arXiv:1903.09185,doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.08.007

2020 doi
[200]

S.Alekhin,J.Blumlein,S.Klein,S.Moch,The3,4,and5-flavorNNLOPartonfromDeep-Inelastic-ScatteringDataandatHadronColliders, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 014032.arXiv:0908.2766,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.014032

2010 doi
[201]

Fleming, A

S. Fleming, A. K. Leibovich, T. Mehen, I. Z. Rothstein, The Systematics of Quarkonium Production at the LHC and Double Parton Fragmentation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 094012.arXiv:1207.2578,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.094012

2012 doi
[202]

Kang, Y.-Q

Z.-B. Kang, Y.-Q. Ma, J.-W. Qiu, G. Sterman, Heavy Quarkonium Production at Collider Energies: Factorization and Evolution, Phys. Rev. D 90 (3) (2014) 034006.arXiv:1401.0923,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.034006

2014 doi
[203]

M.G.Echevarria,ProperTMDfactorizationforquarkoniaproduction:𝑝𝑝→𝜂 𝑐,𝑏 asastudycase,JHEP10(2019)144.arXiv:1907.06494, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)144

2019 doi
[204]

D.Boer,J.Bor,L.Maxia,C.Pisano,F.Yuan,TransversemomentumdependentshapefunctionforJ/𝜓productioninSIDIS,JHEP08(2023) 105.arXiv:2304.09473,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)105

2023 doi
[205]

Braaten, T

E. Braaten, T. C. Yuan, Gluon fragmentation into heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1673–1676.arXiv:hep-ph/9303205, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1673

1993 doi
[206]

Braaten, K.-m

E. Braaten, K.-m. Cheung, T. C. Yuan, Z0 decay into charmonium via charm quark fragmentation, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4230–4235. arXiv:hep-ph/9302307,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.4230

1993 doi
[207]

Zheng, C.-H

X.-C. Zheng, C.-H. Chang, T.-F. Feng, X.-G. Wu, QCD NLO fragmentation functions for c or b¯quark to Bc or Bc* meson and their application, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) (2019) 034004.arXiv:1901.03477,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034004

2019 doi
[208]

Zheng, C.-H

X.-C. Zheng, C.-H. Chang, X.-G. Wu, Fragmentation functions for gluon into𝐵𝑐 or𝐵 ∗ 𝑐 meson, JHEP 05 (2022) 036.arXiv:2112.10520, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)036

2022 doi
[209]

F.Feng,Y.Jia,D.Yang,GluonfragmentationintoBc(*)inNRQCDfactorization,Phys.Rev.D106(5)(2022)054030.arXiv:2112.15569, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.054030

2022 doi
[210]

Zheng, X.-G

X.-C. Zheng, X.-G. Wu, Fragmentation functions for gluon into𝑃-wave𝐵𝑐 mesonsarXiv:2602.01211. Page 31 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint
[211]

F. G. Celiberto, The high-energy spectrum of QCD from inclusive emissions of charmed B-mesons, Phys. Lett. B 835 (2022) 137554. arXiv:2206.09413,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137554

2022 doi
[212]

F. G. Celiberto, High-energy QCD dynamics from bottom flavor fragmentation at the Hi-Lumi LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (4) (2024) 384. arXiv:2401.01410,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12704-x

2024 doi
[213]

Aaij, et al., Precision measurement of𝐶𝑃violation in𝐵 0 𝑠 →𝐽∕𝜓𝐾 +𝐾 − decays, Phys

R. Aaij, et al., Precision measurement of𝐶𝑃violation in𝐵 0 𝑠 →𝐽∕𝜓𝐾 +𝐾 − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (4) (2015) 041801.arXiv: 1411.3104,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.041801

2015 doi
[214]

Aaij, et al., Measurement of the𝑏-quark production cross-section in 7 and 13 TeV𝑝𝑝collisions, Phys

R. Aaij, et al., Measurement of the𝑏-quark production cross-section in 7 and 13 TeV𝑝𝑝collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (5) (2017) 052002, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 169901 (2017)].arXiv:1612.05140,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.052002

2017 doi
[215]

Aaij, et al., Observation of structure in the𝐽∕𝜓-pair mass spectrum, Sci

R. Aaij, et al., Observation of structure in the𝐽∕𝜓-pair mass spectrum, Sci. Bull. 65 (23) (2020) 1983–1993.arXiv:2006.16957, doi:10.1016/j.scib.2020.08.032

2020 doi
[216]

Aad, et al., Observation of an Excess of Dicharmonium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the ATLAS Detector, Phys

G. Aad, et al., Observation of an Excess of Dicharmonium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (15) (2023) 151902.arXiv:2304.08962,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.151902

2023 doi
[217]

arXiv:2009.08376,doi:10.1016/j.scib.2025.04.035

H.-F.Zhang,Y.-Q.Ma,W.-L.Sang,PerturbativeQCDevidenceforspin-2particlesinthedi-𝐽∕𝜓resonances,Sci.Bull.70(2025)1915–1917. arXiv:2009.08376,doi:10.1016/j.scib.2025.04.035

2025 doi
[218]

Zhu, Fully-heavy tetraquark spectra and production at hadron colliders, Nucl

R. Zhu, Fully-heavy tetraquark spectra and production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 966 (2021) 115393.arXiv:2010.09082, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115393

2021 doi
[219]

Suzuki, Spin Property of Heavy Hadron in Heavy Quark Fragmentation: A Simple Model, Phys

M. Suzuki, Spin Property of Heavy Hadron in Heavy Quark Fragmentation: A Simple Model, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 676.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.676

1986 doi
[220]

F.Amiri,C.-R.Ji,PerturbativeQuantumChromodynamicPredictionfortheHeavyQuarkFragmentationFunction,Phys.Lett.B195(1987) 593–598.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91579-6

1987 doi
[221]

F. G. Celiberto, A. Papa, A high-energy QCD portal to exotic matter: Heavy-light tetraquarks at the HL-LHC, Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024) 138406.arXiv:2308.00809,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138406

2024 doi
[222]

F. G. Celiberto, Fragmentation functions for axial-vector heavy tetraquarks: A TQ4Q1.1 update, Phys. Rev. D 111 (11) (2025) L111501. arXiv:2504.03949,doi:10.1103/ympl-ly2l

2025 doi
[223]

F. G. Celiberto, Fragmentation of fully heavy tetraquarks: The TQ4Q1.1 functions as a case study, Phys. Rev. D 112 (7) (2025) 074041. arXiv:2507.09744,doi:10.1103/375n-fw5h

2025 doi
[224]

F. G. Celiberto, A. V. Giannini, V. P. Gonçalves, Y. N. Lima, Fully charmed tetraquark production in forward rapidity𝑝𝑝collisions at LHC and FCC energies, Phys. Rev. D 113 (5) (2026) 054014.arXiv:2511.18984,doi:10.1103/tq47-w7jn

2026 doi
[225]

R.Farashaeian,S.M.MoosaviNejad,Groundstatefullyheavypentaquarkproductioninthepairannihilationprocess,Eur.Phys.J.A60(3) (2024) 65.doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01294-7

2024 doi
[226]

G. P. Lepage, S. J. Brodsky, Exclusive Processes in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2157.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2157

1980 doi
[227]

S. J. Brodsky, C.-R. Ji, Exclusive Production of Higher Generation Hadrons and Form-factor Zeros in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2257.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2257

1985 doi
[228]

Bertone, N

V. Bertone, N. P. Hartland, E. R. Nocera, J. Rojo, L. Rottoli, Charged hadron fragmentation functions from collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (8) (2018) 651, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 155 (2024)].arXiv:1807.03310,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6130-4

2018 doi
[229]

R.Mertig,M.Bohm,A.Denner,FEYNCALC:ComputeralgebraiccalculationofFeynmanamplitudes,Comput.Phys.Commun.64(1991) 345–359.doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90130-D

1991 doi
[230]

Shtabovenko, R

V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207 (2016) 432–444.arXiv: 1601.01167,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.008

2016 doi
[231]

Shtabovenko, R

V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256 (2020) 107478. arXiv:2001.04407,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107478

2020 doi
[232]

P. A. Zyla, et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (8) (2020) 083C01.doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa104

2020 doi
[233]

M. A. Gomshi Nobary, Heavy quark fragmentation functions, J. Phys. G 20 (1994) 65–72.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/20/1/008

1994 doi
[234]

F. G. Celiberto, D. Yu. Ivanov, B. Murdaca, A. Papa, High energy resummation in dihadron production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 94 (3) (2016) 034013.arXiv:1604.08013,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034013

2016 doi
[235]

F. G. Celiberto, D. Yu. Ivanov, B. Murdaca, A. Papa, Dihadron production at the LHC: full next-to-leading BFKL calculation, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (6) (2017) 382.arXiv:1701.05077,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4949-8

2017 doi
[236]

A. D. Bolognino, F. G. Celiberto, D. Yu. Ivanov, M. M. A. Mohammed, A. Papa, Hadron-jet correlations in high-energy hadronic collisions at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (9) (2018) 772.arXiv:1808.05483,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6253-7

2018 doi
[237]

F. G. Celiberto, M. Fucilla, D. Yu. Ivanov, A. Papa, High-energy resummation inΛ𝑐 baryon production, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (8) (2021) 780. arXiv:2105.06432,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09448-3

2021 doi
[238]

F.G.Celiberto,M.Fucilla,D.Yu.Ivanov,M.M.A.Mohammed,A.Papa,Bottom-flavoredinclusiveemissionsinthevariable-flavornumber scheme: A high-energy analysis, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) (2021) 114007.arXiv:2109.11875,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114007

2021 doi
[239]

Binosi, J

D. Binosi, J. Collins, C. Kaufhold, L. Theussl, JaxoDraw: A Graphical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams. Version 2.0 release notes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1709–1715.arXiv:0811.4113,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.02.020

2009 doi
[240]

R. L. Jaffe, F. Wilczek, Diquarks and exotic spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 232003.arXiv:hep-ph/0307341,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.91.232003

2003
[241]

De Sanctis, J

M. De Sanctis, J. Ferretti, R. Magaña Vsevolodovna, P. Saracco, E. Santopinto, An interacting quark-diquark model. Strange and nonstrange baryon spectroscopy and other observables, Few Body Syst. 57 (12) (2016) 1177–1184.arXiv:1608.00387,doi:10.1007/ s00601-016-1139-4

2016
[242]

Page 32 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint

M.Nzar,P.Hoodbhoy,QuarkfragmentationfunctionsinadiquarkmodelforprotonandLambdahyperonproduction,Phys.Rev.D51(1995) 32–36.arXiv:hep-ph/9502349,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.32. Page 32 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint

1995 doi
[243]

B.-Q. Ma, I. Schmidt, J. Soffer, J.-J. Yang, Quark distributions of octet baryons from SU(3) symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 034004. arXiv:hep-ph/0110029,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.034004

2002 doi
[244]

Yang, Flavor and spin structure of quark fragmentation functions in a diquark model for octet baryons, Phys

J.-J. Yang, Flavor and spin structure of quark fragmentation functions in a diquark model for octet baryons, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 094035. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.094035

2002 doi
[245]

A. F. Falk, M. E. Luke, M. J. Savage, M. B. Wise, Heavy quark fragmentation to baryons containing two heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 555–558.arXiv:hep-ph/9305315,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.555

1994 doi
[246]

A. D. Adamov, G. R. Goldstein, Fragmentation functions for baryons in a quark - diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 7381–7391. arXiv:hep-ph/9706491,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.7381

1997 doi
[247]

S. M. Moosavi Nejad, NLO QCD corrections to triply heavy baryon fragmentation function considering the effect of nonperturbative dynamics of baryon bound states, Phys. Rev. D 96 (11) (2017) 114021.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.114021

2017 doi
[248]

M.Delpasand,S.M.MoosaviNejad,Gluonfragmentationintotriplyheavybaryonsconsideringtwovariousscenarios,Phys.Rev.D99(11) (2019) 114028.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.114028

2019 doi
[249]

R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, E. M. Savchenko, Masses of the𝑄𝑄̄𝑄 ̄𝑄tetraquarks in the relativistic diquark–antidiquark picture, Phys. Rev. D 102 (11) (2020) 114030.arXiv:2009.13237,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.114030

2020 doi
[250]

R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, E. M. Savchenko, Heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model, Universe 7 (4) (2021) 94.arXiv: 2103.01763,doi:10.3390/universe7040094

2021 doi
[251]

R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, E. M. Savchenko, Fully Heavy Tetraquark Spectroscopy in the Relativistic Quark Model, Symmetry 14 (12) (2022) 2504.arXiv:2210.16015,doi:10.3390/sym14122504

2022 doi
[252]

Maiani, A

L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, V. Riquer, The New Pentaquarks in the Diquark Model, Phys. Lett. B 749 (2015) 289–291.doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2015.08.008

2015 doi
[253]

R.Farashaeian,S.M.MoosaviNejad,FragmentationproductionofS-waveheavypentaquarkindiquarkmodel,Eur.Phys.J.A60(7)(2024) 143.doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01360-0

2024 doi
[254]

Cacciari, P

M. Cacciari, P. Nason, C. Oleari, A Study of heavy flavored meson fragmentation functions in e+ e- annihilation, JHEP 04 (2006) 006. arXiv:hep-ph/0510032,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/04/006

2006 doi
[255]

B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, I. Schienbein, H. Spiesberger, Finite-mass effects on inclusive𝐵meson hadroproduction, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014011.arXiv:0705.4392,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.014011

2008 doi
[256]

F. G. Celiberto, Unwinding the rareΩsector: Fragmentation of fully charmed baryons from HL-LHC to FCC, Phys. Rev. D 112 (7) (2025) 074023.arXiv:2506.00776,doi:10.1103/sb8n-9nt6

2025 doi
[257]

arXiv:1310.1394,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.03.007

V.Bertone,S.Carrazza,J.Rojo,APFEL:APDFEvolutionLibrarywithQEDcorrections,Comput.Phys.Commun.185(2014)1647–1668. arXiv:1310.1394,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.03.007

2014 doi
[258]

Carrazza, A

S. Carrazza, A. Ferrara, D. Palazzo, J. Rojo, APFEL Web: a web-based application for the graphical visualization of parton distribution functions, J. Phys. G 42 (5) (2015) 057001.arXiv:1410.5456,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/42/5/057001

2015 doi
[259]

Bertone, APFEL++: A new PDF evolution library in C++, PoS DIS2017 (2018) 201.arXiv:1708.00911,doi:10.22323/1.297

V. Bertone, APFEL++: A new PDF evolution library in C++, PoS DIS2017 (2018) 201.arXiv:1708.00911,doi:10.22323/1.297. 0201

2018 doi
[260]

Candido, F

A. Candido, F. Hekhorn, G. Magni, EKO: evolution kernel operators, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) (2022) 976.arXiv:2202.02338,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10878-w

2022 doi
[261]

Hekhorn, G

F. Hekhorn, G. Magni, DGLAP evolution of parton distributions at approximate N3LOarXiv:2306.15294
[262]

F. G. Celiberto, Emergence of high-energy dynamics from cascade-baryon detections at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (4) (2023) 332. arXiv:2208.14577,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11417-x

2023 doi
[263]

F. G. Celiberto, Stabilizing BFKL via Heavy-flavor and NRQCD Fragmentation, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 16 (5) (2023) 41.arXiv: 2211.11780,doi:10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.16.5-A41

2023 doi
[264]

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, G. F. Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5 (1989) 1–91. arXiv:hep-ph/0409313,doi:10.1142/9789814503266_0001

1989 doi
[265]

G. F. Sterman, Partons, factorization and resummation, TASI 95, in: Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 95): QCD and Beyond, 1995, pp. 327–408.arXiv:hep-ph/9606312

1995
[266]

L. V. Gribov, E. M. Levin, M. G. Ryskin, Semihard Processes in QCD, Phys. Rept. 100 (1983) 1–150.doi:10.1016/0370-1573(83) 90022-4

1983 doi
[267]

F. G. Celiberto, High-energy resummation in semi-hard processes at the LHC, Phd thesis, Università della Calabria and INFN-Cosenza (2017).arXiv:1707.04315

2017
[268]

A. D. Bolognino, From semi-hard processes to the unintegrated gluon distribution: a phenomenological path in the high-energy framework, Phd thesis, Calabria U. (2021).arXiv:2109.03033

2021
[269]

M. M. A. Mohammed, Hunting stabilization effects of the high-energy resummation at the LHC, Phd thesis, Università della Calabria and INFN-Cosenza (4 2022).arXiv:2204.11606

2022
[270]

G.Gatto,High-energydynamicsofQCD:Theoreticalandphenomenologicalresults,Phdthesis,UniversitàdellaCalabriaandINFN-Cosenza (6 2025).arXiv:2506.03222

2025
[271]

V. S. Fadin, E. Kuraev, L. Lipatov, On the Pomeranchuk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories, Phys. Lett. B 60 (1975) 50–52. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90524-9

1975 doi
[272]

E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, V. S. Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory, Sov. Phys. JETP 44 (1976) 443–450

1976
[273]

Kuraev, L

E. Kuraev, L. Lipatov, V. S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 199–204

1977
[274]

Balitsky, L

I. Balitsky, L. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28 (1978) 822–829

1978
[275]

V. S. Fadin, L. N. Lipatov, BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation, Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 127–134.arXiv:hep-ph/ 9802290,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00473-0. Page 33 of 44 Fully Heavy Pentaquarks withJethad: A high-Energy Viewpoint

1998 doi
[276]

M.Ciafaloni,G.Camici,Energyscale(s)andnext-to-leadingBFKLequation,Phys.Lett.B430(1998)349–354.arXiv:hep-ph/9803389, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00551-6

1998 doi
[277]

V. S. Fadin, R. Fiore, A. Papa, The Quark part of the nonforward BFKL kernel and the ’bootstrap’ for the gluon Reggeization, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 074025.arXiv:hep-ph/9812456,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.074025

1999 doi
[278]

V. S. Fadin, D. A. Gorbachev, Nonforward color octet BFKL kernel, JETP Lett. 71 (2000) 222–226.doi:10.1134/1.568320

2000 doi
[279]

V. S. Fadin, D. A. Gorbachev, Nonforward color-octet kernel of the Balitsky-Fadin-Kuraev-Lipatov equation, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 63 (2000) 2157–2172.doi:10.1134/1.1333885

2000 doi
[280]

V.S.Fadin,R.Fiore,Non-forwardBFKLpomeronatnext-to-leadingorder,Phys.Lett.B610(2005)61–66,[Erratum:Phys.Lett.B621,320 (2005)].arXiv:hep-ph/0412386,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.06.074

2005 doi
[281]

V. S. Fadin, R. Fiore, Non-forward NLO BFKL kernel, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 014018.arXiv:hep-ph/0502045,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.72.014018

2005
[282]

F.Caola,A.Chakraborty,G.Gambuti,A.vonManteuffel,L.Tancredi,Three-LoopGluonScatteringinQCDandtheGluonReggeTrajectory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (21) (2022) 212001.arXiv:2112.11097,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.212001

2022 doi
[283]

128 (13) (2022) 132001.arXiv:2112.11098,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.132001

G.Falcioni,E.Gardi,N.Maher,C.Milloy,L.Vernazza,DisentanglingtheReggeCutandReggePoleinPerturbativeQCD,Phys.Rev.Lett. 128 (13) (2022) 132001.arXiv:2112.11098,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.132001

2022 doi
[284]

Del Duca, R

V. Del Duca, R. Marzucca, B. Verbeek, The gluon Regge trajectory at three loops from planar Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 01 (2022) 149. arXiv:2111.14265,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)149

2022 doi
[285]

E. P. Byrne, V. Del Duca, L. J. Dixon, E. Gardi, J. M. Smillie, One-loop central-emission vertex for two gluons in= 4 super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 08 (2022) 271.arXiv:2204.12459,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)271

2022 doi
[286]

V. S. Fadin, M. Fucilla, A. Papa, One-loop Lipatov vertex in QCD with higher𝜖-accuracy, JHEP 04 (2023) 137.arXiv:2302.09868, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)137

2023 doi
[287]

E.P.Byrne,One-loopfive-partonamplitudesintheNMRKlimit,JHEP07(2024)284.arXiv:2312.15051,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024) 284

2024 doi
[288]

V. S. Fadin, R. Fiore, M. I. Kotsky, A. Papa, The Gluon impact factors, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 094005.arXiv:hep-ph/9908264, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.094005

2000 doi
[289]

V. S. Fadin, R. Fiore, M. I. Kotsky, A. Papa, The Quark impact factors, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 094006.arXiv:hep-ph/9908265, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.094006

2000 doi
[290]

Bartels, D

J. Bartels, D. Colferai, G. P. Vacca, The NLO jet vertex for Mueller-Navelet and forward jets: The Quark part, Eur. Phys. J. C 24 (2002) 83–99.arXiv:hep-ph/0112283,doi:10.1007/s100520200919

2002 doi
[291]

Bartels, D

J. Bartels, D. Colferai, G. P. Vacca, The NLO jet vertex for Mueller-Navelet and forward jets: The Gluon part, Eur. Phys. J. C 29 (2003) 235–249.arXiv:hep-ph/0206290,doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01169-5

2003 doi
[292]

F.Caporale,D.Yu.Ivanov,B.Murdaca,A.Papa,A.Perri,Thenext-to-leadingorderjetvertexforMueller-Naveletandforwardjetsrevisited, JHEP 02 (2012) 101.arXiv:1112.3752,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)101

2012 doi
[293]

D. Yu. Ivanov, A. Papa, The next-to-leading order forward jet vertex in the small-cone approximation, JHEP 05 (2012) 086.arXiv: 1202.1082,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2012)086

2012 doi
[294]

Colferai, A

D. Colferai, A. Niccoli, The NLO jet vertex in the small-cone approximation for kt and cone algorithms, JHEP 04 (2015) 071.arXiv: 1501.07442,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)071

2015 doi
[295]

D.Yu.Ivanov,A.Papa,Inclusiveproductionofapairofhadronsseparatedbyalargeintervalofrapidityinprotoncollisions,JHEP07(2012) 045.arXiv:1205.6068,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)045

2012 doi
[296]

D. Yu. Ivanov, M. I. Kotsky, A. Papa, The Impact factor for the virtual photon to light vector meson transition, Eur. Phys. J. C 38 (2004) 195–213.arXiv:hep-ph/0405297,doi:10.1140/epjc/s2004-02039-4

2004 doi
[297]

J.Bartels,S.Gieseke,C.F.Qiao,The(gamma*—>qanti-q)Reggeonvertexinnext-to-leadingorderQCD,Phys.Rev.D63(2001)056014, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 65, 079902 (2002)].arXiv:hep-ph/0009102,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.056014

2001 doi
[298]

Bartels, S

J. Bartels, S. Gieseke, A. Kyrieleis, The Process gamma*(L) + q —>(q anti-q g) + q: Real corrections to the virtual photon impact factor, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 014006.arXiv:hep-ph/0107152,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.014006

2002 doi
[299]

Bartels, D

J. Bartels, D. Colferai, S. Gieseke, A. Kyrieleis, NLO corrections to the photon impact factor: Combining real and virtual corrections, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 094017.arXiv:hep-ph/0208130,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.094017

2002 doi
[300]

Bartels, A

J. Bartels, A. Kyrieleis, NLO corrections to the gamma* impact factor: First numerical results for the real corrections to gamma*(L), Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 114003.arXiv:hep-ph/0407051,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.114003

2004 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Apollinari, O

G. Apollinari, O. Brüning, T. Nakamoto, L. Rossi, High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. (5) (2015) 1–19. arXiv:1705.08830,doi:10.5170/CERN-2015-005.1

work page doi:10.5170/cern-2015-005.1 2015

[2] [2]

High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) : Preliminary Design Reportdoi:10.5170/CERN-2015-005

work page doi:10.5170/cern-2015-005 2015

[3] [3]

Apollinari, I

High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical Design Report V. 0.1 4/2017.doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-004

work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-004 2017

[4] [4]

Chapon, et al., Prospects for quarkonium studies at the high-luminosity LHC, Prog

E. Chapon, et al., Prospects for quarkonium studies at the high-luminosity LHC, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 122 (2022) 103906.arXiv: 2012.14161,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103906

work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103906 2022

[5] [5]

R.AbdulKhalek,etal.,ScienceRequirementsandDetectorConceptsfortheElectron-IonCollider:EICYellowReport,Nucl.Phys.A1026 (2022) 122447.arXiv:2103.05419,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 2022

[6] [6]

Abdul Khalek et al

R. Abdul Khalek, et al., Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Electron Ion Collider for High Energy Physics, in: 2022 Snowmass Summer Study, 2022.arXiv:2203.13199

work page arXiv 2021

[7] [7]

Hentschinski, et al., White Paper on Forward Physics, BFKL, Saturation Physics and Diffraction, Acta Phys

M. Hentschinski, et al., White Paper on Forward Physics, BFKL, Saturation Physics and Diffraction, Acta Phys. Polon. B 54 (3) (2023) 2. arXiv:2203.08129,doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.54.3-A2

work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.54.3-a2 2023

[8] [8]

Snowmass 2021 Whitepaper: Proton Structure at the Precision Frontier

S. Amoroso, et al., Snowmass 2021 whitepaper: Proton structure at the precision frontier, Acta Phys. Polon. B 53 (12) (2022) A1. arXiv:2203.13923,doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.53.12-A1

work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.53.12-a1 2021