pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14741 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

The OPE Approach to Renormalization: Operator Mixing

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords operator product expansionrenormalizationcomposite operatorsoperator mixinganomalous dimensionsphi^4 theoryphi^3 theoryloop calculations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Composite operator Z-factors in scalar theories are fixed by OPE coefficients of lower-dimensional traceless tensors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends an OPE-based renormalization method to handle mixing among composite scalar operators in φ⁴ and φ³ models. It demonstrates that the renormalization constants for these operators can be obtained from the operator product expansion with the fundamental field, specifically using coefficients from simpler lower-dimensional operators. A recursive framework is set up that allows computation of anomalous dimensions at high loop orders without computing all diagrams directly. The approach yields five-loop results for operators with scaling dimension up to 5 in the φ⁴ theory and two-loop results for dimensions up to 10 in the φ³ theory.

Core claim

Using the OPE of operators with a fundamental field, the Z-factors of composite operators are determined by OPE coefficients of lower-dimensional traceless symmetric tensor operators, establishing a recursive renormalization framework for operators with mixing.

What carries the argument

The OPE of composite operators with the fundamental field, which extracts the Z-factors from coefficients of lower-dimensional traceless symmetric tensor operators.

If this is right

  • Renormalization constants for mixed operators follow recursively from lower ones.
  • Five-loop anomalous dimensions are obtained for all scalar operators with Δ ≤ 5 in the φ⁴ model.
  • Two-loop anomalous dimensions are computed for operators with Δ ≤ 10 in the φ³ model.
  • The method provides an efficient way to handle operator mixing in perturbative calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such a recursive structure may allow systematic computation of anomalous dimensions to even higher orders in these models.
  • The framework could be applied to other quantum field theories where operator mixing occurs.
  • Independent determination of lower-dimensional OPE coefficients is key to avoiding circularity in the recursion.

Load-bearing premise

OPE coefficients for lower-dimensional traceless symmetric tensor operators can be computed independently without circular dependence on the higher operators being renormalized.

What would settle it

If the anomalous dimensions calculated via this recursive OPE method disagree with those from direct multi-loop Feynman diagram computations at the same order, the approach would be falsified.

read the original abstract

We extend the OPE-based renormalization algorithm to composite operators with operator mixing, focusing on scalar operators in $\phi^4$ and $\phi^3$ models. Using the OPE of operators with a fundamental field, we show that the $Z$-factors of these composite operators are determined by OPE coefficients of lower-dimensional traceless symmetric tensor operators, and establish a recursive renormalization framework. We report the five-loop anomalous dimensions for operators with $\Delta\le5$ in the $\phi^4$ model and the two-loop anomalous dimensions for operators with $\Delta\le10$ in the $\phi^3$ model. These results further demonstrate the versatility and efficiency of the OPE-based algorithm.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the OPE-based renormalization algorithm to composite operators with mixing in the φ⁴ and φ³ scalar models. It shows that the Z-factors (and thus anomalous dimensions) of composite operators at dimension Δ are recursively determined from OPE coefficients of lower-dimensional traceless symmetric tensor operators with the fundamental field. The recursion is ordered strictly by increasing operator dimension. Explicit results are given: five-loop anomalous dimensions for all operators with Δ ≤ 5 in φ⁴, and two-loop anomalous dimensions for operators with Δ ≤ 10 in φ³.

Significance. If the central recursive construction holds, the work provides a computationally efficient route to high-loop anomalous dimensions that avoids direct evaluation of mixing matrices at each dimension. The strict dimension ordering ensures that lower-dimensional OPE coefficients can be treated as independent inputs, removing the circularity concern raised in the stress-test note. The concrete five-loop and two-loop results constitute a non-trivial test of the method and supply new data for cross-validation with other techniques. The approach is presented as versatile across two models, which strengthens its potential utility for conformal bootstrap and CFT studies.

major comments (1)
  1. The recursive renormalization framework: the central claim that Z-factors at dimension Δ depend only on OPE coefficients from strictly lower dimensions is load-bearing. The manuscript should include an explicit statement or short algorithmic outline confirming that no Z-factor or mixing matrix from operators at or above Δ enters the coefficient extraction step for Δ (e.g., by showing the dependence graph for the Δ=4 and Δ=5 cases).
minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'traceless symmetric tensor operators' is used without a brief parenthetical reminder of their dimension relative to the composite operators being renormalized; a short clarification would improve readability.
  2. The reported five-loop results for φ⁴ and two-loop results for φ³ would benefit from a short table or appendix entry listing the numerical values alongside any previously known lower-loop checks for the lowest-lying operators.
  3. Notation: the distinction between the Z-factors of the composite operators and the OPE coefficients extracted from the fundamental-field OPE should be made visually clearer (e.g., consistent use of subscripts or fonts) to avoid confusion when the recursion is first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the constructive comment on clarifying the recursive structure. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit statement and outline.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The recursive renormalization framework: the central claim that Z-factors at dimension Δ depend only on OPE coefficients from strictly lower dimensions is load-bearing. The manuscript should include an explicit statement or short algorithmic outline confirming that no Z-factor or mixing matrix from operators at or above Δ enters the coefficient extraction step for Δ (e.g., by showing the dependence graph for the Δ=4 and Δ=5 cases).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit algorithmic outline will strengthen the presentation of the central claim. The recursion is strictly ordered by increasing operator dimension, so that the OPE coefficient extraction for any operator at dimension Δ uses only the already-determined Z-factors and OPE coefficients of all lower-dimensional traceless symmetric tensor operators (together with the fundamental field). No Z-factor or mixing matrix belonging to operators at dimension Δ or higher enters this step. In the revised manuscript we will add a short dedicated paragraph (or subsection) that states this dependence explicitly and includes a simple dependence graph or table for the Δ=4 and Δ=5 cases in the φ⁴ model, thereby confirming the absence of circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; recursion ordered strictly by dimension

full rationale

The paper constructs a recursive renormalization scheme in which Z-factors and anomalous dimensions for operators of dimension Δ are expressed solely in terms of OPE coefficients extracted from lower-dimensional traceless symmetric tensor operators. Because the recursion proceeds in strictly increasing order of dimension, no Z-factor or mixing matrix computed at or above Δ enters the determination of the coefficients used for Δ. This ordering renders the derivation self-contained and non-circular by construction. The reported five-loop results in the φ⁴ model and two-loop results in the φ³ model are concrete, independently verifiable outputs rather than tautological re-expressions of inputs. No self-definitional steps, fitted quantities renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to an unverified prior result are present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach relies on standard assumptions in perturbative QFT and the validity of the OPE, with no new free parameters or entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The operator product expansion holds for the composite operators in these models.
    Central to using OPE coefficients to determine Z-factors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5400 in / 1155 out tokens · 37550 ms · 2026-05-10T10:59:23.454089+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Peskin and D.V

    M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA (1995), 10.1201/9780429503559

  2. [2]

    Punjabi, C.F

    V. Punjabi, C.F. Perdrisat, M.K. Jones, E.J. Brash and C.E. Carlson,The Structure of the Nucleon: Elastic Electromagnetic Form Factors,Eur. Phys. J. A51(2015) 79 [1503.01452]

  3. [3]

    Ellis, H

    R.K. Ellis, H. Georgi, M. Machacek, H.D. Politzer and G.G. Ross,Perturbation Theory and the Parton Model in QCD,Nucl. Phys. B152(1979) 285

  4. [4]

    Libby and G.F

    S.B. Libby and G.F. Sterman,Jet and Lepton Pair Production in High-Energy Lepton-Hadron and Hadron-Hadron Scattering,Phys. Rev. D18(1978) 3252

  5. [5]

    Smirnov,Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses,Springer Tracts Mod

    V.A. Smirnov,Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses,Springer Tracts Mod. Phys.177(2002) 1

  6. [6]

    Muta,Foundations of Quantum Chromodynamics: An Introduction to Perturbative Methods in Gauge Theories, (3rd ed.), vol

    T. Muta,Foundations of Quantum Chromodynamics: An Introduction to Perturbative Methods in Gauge Theories, (3rd ed.), vol. 78 ofWorld scientific Lecture Notes in Physics, World Scientific, Hackensack, N.J., 3rd ed. (2010)

  7. [7]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York (1997), 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

  8. [8]

    Andrianopoli, S

    L. Andrianopoli, S. Ferrara, E. Sokatchev and B. Zupnik,Shortening of primary operators in N extended SCFT(4) and harmonic superspace analyticity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2000) 1149 [hep-th/9912007]

  9. [9]

    Antipin, J

    O. Antipin, J. Bersini, F. Sannino, Z.-W. Wang and C. Zhang,Untangling scaling dimensions of fixed charge operators in Higgs theories,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 125024 [2102.04390]

  10. [10]

    Bajc and A.R

    B. Bajc and A.R. Lugo,Holographic thermal propagator for arbitrary scale dimensions, JHEP05(2023) 103 [2212.13639]

  11. [11]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]. – 29 –

  12. [12]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

  13. [13]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  14. [14]

    Maldacena,TASI 2003 lectures on AdS / CFT, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2003): Recent Trends in String Theory, pp

    J.M. Maldacena,TASI 2003 lectures on AdS / CFT, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2003): Recent Trends in String Theory, pp. 155–203, 9, 2003 [hep-th/0309246]

  15. [15]

    Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

  16. [16]

    Operator Dictionaries and Wave Functions in AdS/CFT and dS/CFT,

    D. Harlow and D. Stanford,Operator Dictionaries and Wave Functions in AdS/CFT and dS/CFT,1104.2621

  17. [17]

    Guica,Bulk fields from the boundary OPE,1610.08952

    M. Guica,Bulk fields from the boundary OPE,1610.08952

  18. [18]

    Castro, E

    A. Castro, E. Llabr´ es and F. Rejon-Barrera,Geodesic Diagrams, Gravitational Interactions & OPE Structures,JHEP06(2017) 099 [1702.06128]

  19. [19]

    Marino,Quantum Field Theory Approach to Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (9, 2017)

    E.C. Marino,Quantum Field Theory Approach to Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (9, 2017)

  20. [20]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996), 10.1017/CBO9781316036440

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996), 10.1017/CBO9781316036440

  21. [21]

    Caselle and M

    M. Caselle and M. Hasenbusch,Universal amplitude ratios in the 3-D Ising model,J. Phys. A30(1997) 4963 [hep-lat/9701007]

  22. [22]

    Altland and B.D

    A. Altland and B. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory, Cambridge University Press (8, 2023), 10.1017/9781108781244

  23. [23]

    Avella, F

    A. Avella, F. Mancini, F.P. Mancini and E. Plekhanov,Emery vs. hubbard model for cuprate superconductors: a composite operator method study,The European Physical Journal B86 (2013)

  24. [24]

    Ciolo and Avella,The composite operator method route to the 2d hubbard model and the cuprates,Condensed Matter Physics21(2018) 33701

    D. Ciolo and Avella,The composite operator method route to the 2d hubbard model and the cuprates,Condensed Matter Physics21(2018) 33701

  25. [25]

    Irkhin and Y.N

    V.Y. Irkhin and Y.N. Skryabin,Modern physics of the condensed state: Strong correlations and quantum topology,Physics of Metals and Metallography120(2019) 513–548

  26. [26]

    The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi,The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 015002 [1805.04405]

  27. [27]

    Chester,Weizmann lectures on the numerical conformal bootstrap,Phys

    S.M. Chester,Weizmann lectures on the numerical conformal bootstrap,Phys. Rept.1045 (2023) 1 [1907.05147]

  28. [28]

    Moshe and J

    M. Moshe and J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum field theory in the large N limit: A Review,Phys. Rept.385(2003) 69 [hep-th/0306133]

  29. [29]

    Lucini and M

    B. Lucini and M. Panero,SU(N) gauge theories at large N,Phys. Rept.526(2013) 93 [1210.4997]

  30. [30]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.113(2005) 843 [hep-th/0412141]

  31. [31]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Factorized s Matrices in Two-Dimensions as – 30 – the Exact Solutions of Certain Relativistic Quantum Field Models,Annals Phys.120(1979) 253

  32. [32]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,Quantum Spectral Curve for Planar N= 4Super-Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 011602 [1305.1939]

  33. [33]

    Ekhammar, N

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and P. Ryan,New approach to strongly coupledN= 4 SYM via integrability,JHEP12(2024) 165 [2406.02698]

  34. [34]

    Wilson,The Renormalization Group and Strong Interactions,Phys

    K.G. Wilson,The Renormalization Group and Strong Interactions,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 1818

  35. [35]

    Wilson,Confinement of Quarks,Phys

    K.G. Wilson,Confinement of Quarks,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2445

  36. [36]

    Gattringer and C.B

    C. Gattringer and C.B. Lang,Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice, vol. 788, Springer, Berlin (2010), 10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3

  37. [37]

    Polonyi,Lectures on the functional renormalization group method,Central Eur

    J. Polonyi,Lectures on the functional renormalization group method,Central Eur. J. Phys.1 (2003) 1 [hep-th/0110026]

  38. [38]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J.M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier et al.,The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications,Phys. Rept.910 (2021) 1 [2006.04853]

  39. [39]

    Madore,The Fuzzy sphere,Class

    J. Madore,The Fuzzy sphere,Class. Quant. Grav.9(1992) 69

  40. [40]

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J.S. Hofmann and Y.-C. He,Uncovering Conformal Symmetry in the 3D Ising Transition: State-Operator Correspondence from a Quantum Fuzzy Sphere Regularization,Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 021009 [2210.13482]

  41. [41]

    Hofmann, F

    J.S. Hofmann, F. Goth, W. Zhu, Y.-C. He and E. Huffman,Quantum Monte Carlo simulation of the 3D Ising transition on the fuzzy sphere,SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 028 [2310.19880]

  42. [42]

    Voinea, W

    C. Voinea, W. Zhu, N. Regnault and Z. Papi´ c,Critical Majorana Fermion at a Topological Quantum Hall Bilayer Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 076601 [2509.08036]

  43. [43]

    Toth et al.,Muon g-2: BMW calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution,PoSLATTICE2021(2022) 005

    B.C. Toth et al.,Muon g-2: BMW calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution,PoSLATTICE2021(2022) 005

  44. [44]

    Davier, A

    M. Davier, A. Hoecker, A.-M. Lutz, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang,Tensions in e+e− →π +π−(γ)measurements: the new landscape of data-driven hadronic vacuum polarization predictions for the muong−2,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 721 [2312.02053]

  45. [45]

    J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Standard-Model Prediction ofϵ K with Manifest Quark-Mixing Unitarity,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 171803 [1911.06822]

  46. [46]

    de Vries, G

    J. de Vries, G. Falcioni, F. Herzog and B. Ruijl,Two- and three-loop anomalous dimensions of Weinberg’s dimension-six CP-odd gluonic operator,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 016010 [1907.04923]

  47. [47]

    Henriksson, F

    J. Henriksson, F. Herzog, S.R. Kousvos and J. Roosmale Nepveu,Multi-loop spectra in general scalar EFTs and CFTs,2507.12518

  48. [48]

    Q. Jin, K. Ren, G. Yang and R. Yu,Gluonic evanescent operators: two-loop anomalous dimensions,JHEP02(2023) 039 [2208.08976]

  49. [49]

    Blümlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, P. Marquard, N. Rana and C. Schneider,Analytic results on the massive three-loop form factors: Quarkonic contributions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 094003 [2307.02983]. – 31 –

  50. [50]

    Q. Jin, K. Ren, G. Yang and R. Yu,Is Yang-Mills theory unitary in fractional spacetime dimensions?,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67(2024) 271011 [2301.01786]

  51. [51]

    Q. Jin, K. Ren, G. Yang and R. Yu,Gluonic evanescent operators: negative-norm states and complex anomalous dimensions,JHEP09(2024) 151 [2312.08445]

  52. [52]

    Huang, Q

    R. Huang, Q. Jin and Y. Li,From operator product expansion to anomalous dimensions, JHEP06(2025) 135 [2410.03283]

  53. [53]

    Huang, Q

    R. Huang, Q. Jin and Y. Li,Five-loop anomalous dimensions of cubic scalar theory from operator product expansion,JHEP02(2026) 158 [2508.13620]

  54. [54]

    Bukhvostov, G.V

    A.P. Bukhvostov, G.V. Frolov, L.N. Lipatov and E.A. Kuraev,Evolution equations for quasi-partonic operators,Nucl. Phys. B258(1985) 601

  55. [55]

    Balitsky and V.M

    I.I. Balitsky and V.M. Braun,Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators,Nucl. Phys. B 311(1989) 541

  56. [56]

    Braun, G.P

    V.M. Braun, G.P. Korchemsky and D. M¨ uller,The Uses of conformal symmetry in QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.51(2003) 311 [hep-ph/0306057]

  57. [57]

    Wilson,Nonlagrangian models of current algebra,Phys

    K.G. Wilson,Nonlagrangian models of current algebra,Phys. Rev.179(1969) 1499

  58. [58]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 385

  59. [59]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics: Applications,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 448

  60. [60]

    Chetyrkin, V.P

    K.G. Chetyrkin, V.P. Spiridonov and S.G. Gorishnii,WILSON EXPANSION FOR CORRELATORS OF VECTOR CURRENTS AT THE TWO LOOP LEVEL: DIMENSION FOUR OPERATORS,Phys. Lett. B160(1985) 149

  61. [61]

    Pich and J

    A. Pich and J. Prades,Strange quark mass determination from Cabibbo suppressed tau decays,JHEP10(1999) 004 [hep-ph/9909244]

  62. [62]

    Pich and A

    A. Pich and A. Rodr´ ıguez-S´ anchez,Determination of the QCD coupling from ALEPHτ decay data,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 034027 [1605.06830]

  63. [63]

    Boito, M

    D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, S. Peris, M.V. Rodrigues and W. Schaaf,Strong coupling from an improvedτvector isovector spectral function,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 034028 [2012.10440]

  64. [64]

    Ayala, G

    C. Ayala, G. Cvetic and D. Teca,Borel–Laplace sum rules withτdecay data, using OPE with improved anomalous dimensions,J. Phys. G50(2023) 045004 [2206.05631]

  65. [65]

    Br¨ user, A.H

    R. Br¨ user, A.H. Hoang and M. Stahlhofen,Three-loop OPE Wilson coefficients of dimension-four operators for (axial-)vector and (pseudo-)scalar current correlators,JHEP12 (2024) 103 [2408.03989]

  66. [66]

    Luscher,Operator product expansions on the vacuum in conformal quantum field theory in two spacetime dimensions,Commun

    M. Luscher,Operator product expansions on the vacuum in conformal quantum field theory in two spacetime dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.50(1976) 23

  67. [67]

    Conformal Four Point Functions and the Operator Product Expansion

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn,Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion,Nucl. Phys. B599(2001) 459 [hep-th/0011040]

  68. [68]

    Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn,Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion, Nucl. Phys. B678(2004) 491 [hep-th/0309180]. – 32 –

  69. [69]

    Hollands,The Operator product expansion for perturbative quantum field theory in curved spacetime,Commun

    S. Hollands,The Operator product expansion for perturbative quantum field theory in curved spacetime,Commun. Math. Phys.273(2007) 1 [gr-qc/0605072]

  70. [70]

    Holland and S

    J. Holland and S. Hollands,Recursive construction of operator product expansion coefficients, Commun. Math. Phys.336(2015) 1555 [1401.3144]

  71. [71]

    Convergent Momentum-Space OPE and Bootstrap Equations in Conformal Field Theory,

    M. Gillioz, X. Lu, M.A. Luty and G. Mikaberidze,Convergent Momentum-Space OPE and Bootstrap Equations in Conformal Field Theory,JHEP03(2020) 102 [1912.05550]

  72. [72]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R.M. Wald,The Operator Product Expansion in Quantum Field Theory, 2312.01096

  73. [73]

    Chetyrkin, F.V

    K.G. Chetyrkin, F.V. Tkachov and S.G. Gorishnii,OPERATOR PRODUCT EXPANSION IN THE MINIMAL SUBTRACTION SCHEME,Phys. Lett. B119(1982) 407

  74. [74]

    Chetyrkin,Operator Expansions in the Minimal Subtraction Scheme

    K.G. Chetyrkin,Operator Expansions in the Minimal Subtraction Scheme. 1: The Gluing Method,Theor. Math. Phys.75(1988) 346

  75. [75]

    Tkachov,ON THE OPERATOR PRODUCT EXPANSION IN THE MS SCHEME, Phys

    F.V. Tkachov,ON THE OPERATOR PRODUCT EXPANSION IN THE MS SCHEME, Phys. Lett. B124(1983) 212

  76. [76]

    Gorishnii, S.A

    S.G. Gorishnii, S.A. Larin and F.V. Tkachov,THE ALGORITHM FOR OPE COEFFICIENT FUNCTIONS IN THE MS SCHEME,Phys. Lett. B124(1983) 217

  77. [77]

    Gorishnii and S.A

    S.G. Gorishnii and S.A. Larin,Coefficient Functions of Asymptotic Operator Expansions in Minimal Subtraction Scheme,Nucl. Phys. B283(1987) 452

  78. [78]

    Llewellyn Smith and J.P

    C.H. Llewellyn Smith and J.P. de Vries,The Operator Product Expansion for Minimally Subtracted Operators,Nucl. Phys. B296(1988) 991

  79. [79]

    Collins,Renormalization : An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, vol

    J.C. Collins,Renormalization : An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, vol. 26 ofCambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984), 10.1017/9781009401807

  80. [80]

    Smirnov,Asymptotic expansions in limits of large momenta and masses,Commun

    V.A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansions in limits of large momenta and masses,Commun. Math. Phys.134(1990) 109

Showing first 80 references.