arxiv: 2604.17091 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

GenericAgent: A Token-Efficient Self-Evolving LLM Agent via Contextual Information Density Maximization (V1.0)

Jiaqing Liang , Jinyi Han , Weijia Li , Xinyi Wang , Zhoujia Zhang , Zishang Jiang , Ying Liao , Tingyun Li

show 10 more authors

Ying Huang Hao Shen Hanyu Wu Fang Guo Keyi Wang Zhonghua Hong Zhiyu Lu Lipeng Ma Sihang Jiang Yanghua Xiao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords LLM agentscontext managementself-evolutioninformation densitytool use efficiencymemory systemstoken reductionlong-horizon tasks

0 comments

The pith

GenericAgent maintains high decision-relevant information density in limited context to let LLM agents complete long tasks efficiently while evolving on their own.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that long-horizon LLM agent performance depends on packing useful decision information into a fixed context budget rather than extending the context itself. GenericAgent puts this into practice with a minimal tool interface, selective hierarchical memory, automatic conversion of successful runs into reusable procedures and code, and active compression to prevent dilution. If the approach holds, agents would finish complex tasks with far fewer tokens and interactions, retain lessons across episodes, and improve steadily without outside help. Current systems lose ground because raw accumulation of tool outputs, memories, and feedback crowds out what actually matters for the next choice. The reported results show GA ahead on completion, efficiency, memory, evolution, and browsing benchmarks while using less total context.

Core claim

GenericAgent is built on the principle that long-horizon performance is set by the density of decision-relevant information kept inside any finite context window. It achieves this through four linked parts: a minimal atomic tool set that avoids interface bloat, a hierarchical on-demand memory shown only at high level by default, a self-evolution step that turns verified trajectories into reusable SOPs and executable code, and a truncation-compression layer that keeps density high during extended runs. The result is consistent outperformance over leading agent systems on task completion, tool efficiency, memory effectiveness, self-evolution, and web browsing, all while consuming markedly less

What carries the argument

Context information density maximization, carried out by the combination of minimal atomic tools, hierarchical on-demand memory, trajectory-to-SOP conversion, and dynamic truncation-compression.

If this is right

Agents finish extended tasks without context overflow because only high-value information stays visible.
Success rates rise over successive episodes as reusable procedures replace repeated trial-and-error.
Total tokens and interactions drop while task outcomes stay equal or better.
The same system generalizes across tool-using, memory-heavy, and web-browsing workloads.
Performance gains compound automatically once the self-evolution loop runs without manual updates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The density focus could apply to agent designs outside pure LLM settings where context or memory budgets are also constrained.
Running the system on benchmarks that include noisy or changing environments would test whether the SOP extraction remains stable.
Combining the compression layer with other established summarization methods might produce still larger token savings.
The results suggest agent research should treat information selection as a first-class design choice rather than a side effect of model scale.

Load-bearing premise

That verified past trajectories can be turned into reusable standard operating procedures and executable code that reliably improve later performance without introducing errors.

What would settle it

A sequence of repeated tasks in which GenericAgent's success rate stops rising or falls after several self-evolution cycles while token counts stay the same or increase.

read the original abstract

Long-horizon large language model (LLM) agents are fundamentally limited by context. As interactions become longer, tool descriptions, retrieved memories, and raw environmental feedback accumulate and push out the information needed for decision-making. At the same time, useful experience gained from tasks is often lost across episodes. We argue that long-horizon performance is determined not by context length, but by how much decision-relevant information is maintained within a finite context budget. We present GenericAgent (GA), a general-purpose, self-evolving LLM agent system built around a single principle: context information density maximization. GA implements this through four closely connected components: a minimal atomic tool set that keeps the interface simple, a hierarchical on-demand memory that only shows a small high-level view by default, a self-evolution mechanism that turns verified past trajectories into reusable SOPs and executable code, and a context truncation and compression layer that maintains information density during long executions. Across task completion, tool use efficiency, memory effectiveness, self-evolution, and web browsing, GA consistently outperforms leading agent systems while using significantly fewer tokens and interactions, and it continues to evolve over time. Project: https://github.com/lsdefine/GenericAgent

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

GenericAgent bundles minimal tools, on-demand memory, trajectory-to-SOP evolution, and density-preserving truncation under one principle, but the self-evolution step and performance claims rest on details the abstract does not supply.

read the letter

The paper's core move is to treat long-horizon agent limits as an information-density problem rather than a context-length problem. GenericAgent keeps a tiny atomic tool set, shows memory only at high level until needed, converts verified trajectories into reusable SOPs and code, and applies truncation that tries to preserve decision-relevant content. That combination under a single stated principle is the part that does not appear in the prior work the abstract cites.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces GenericAgent (GA), a general-purpose self-evolving LLM agent built around the principle of maximizing contextual information density within a finite context budget. It implements this via four components: a minimal atomic tool set, hierarchical on-demand memory, a self-evolution mechanism that converts verified past trajectories into reusable SOPs and executable code, and a context truncation/compression layer. The central claim is that GA consistently outperforms leading agent systems across task completion, tool use efficiency, memory effectiveness, self-evolution, and web browsing, while using significantly fewer tokens and interactions, and that it continues to improve over time.

Significance. If the empirical results hold under rigorous validation, the work offers a principled alternative to simply scaling context length in LLM agents, with potential impact on long-horizon task performance and autonomous improvement. The explicit design principle of information density maximization and the integration of self-evolution from trajectories are strengths that could influence future agent architectures, particularly if the efficiency gains (fewer tokens/interactions) are reproducible.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim of consistent outperformance across task completion, tool use efficiency, memory effectiveness, self-evolution, and web browsing is presented without any details on benchmarks, baselines, metrics, number of trials, statistical tests, or ablation studies on the four components. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the abstract supplies the only high-level evidence summary available.
[Self-evolution mechanism] Self-evolution mechanism (described in the methods): the conversion of verified trajectories into reusable SOPs and executable code is asserted to enable continued evolution without errors or inconsistencies, but no implementation details, error analysis, precondition checks, or ablation isolating this step are provided. Failure of this assumption would falsify both the efficiency gains and the self-evolution results.
[Experimental evaluation] Experimental evaluation section: the headline result requires direct comparison to leading agent systems with concrete metrics for each dimension (e.g., success rate, token count, interaction count). Without reported controls, variance, or component ablations, the outperformance and continued-evolution claims cannot be assessed.

minor comments (1)

[Introduction] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit related-work subsection situating the information-density principle against prior context-compression and memory-augmented agent papers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. The comments correctly identify areas where the current manuscript (V1.0) lacks sufficient supporting detail to fully substantiate its central claims. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of consistent outperformance across task completion, tool use efficiency, memory effectiveness, self-evolution, and web browsing is presented without any details on benchmarks, baselines, metrics, number of trials, statistical tests, or ablation studies on the four components. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the abstract supplies the only high-level evidence summary available.

Authors: We agree that the abstract should supply more concrete context for the performance claims. In the revised version we will expand the abstract to name the primary benchmarks, list the main baselines, and briefly note the key metrics (success rate, token count, interaction count) together with the existence of ablations and multi-trial evaluation, while remaining within length constraints and directing readers to the experimental section for full details. revision: yes
Referee: [Self-evolution mechanism] Self-evolution mechanism (described in the methods): the conversion of verified trajectories into reusable SOPs and executable code is asserted to enable continued evolution without errors or inconsistencies, but no implementation details, error analysis, precondition checks, or ablation isolating this step are provided. Failure of this assumption would falsify both the efficiency gains and the self-evolution results.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current description is insufficiently detailed. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated subsection containing (1) the exact procedure for trajectory verification and SOP/code extraction, (2) precondition checks and error-handling logic, (3) quantitative error analysis from our runs, and (4) an ablation that isolates the self-evolution component. These additions will allow readers to evaluate the robustness of the mechanism. revision: yes
Referee: [Experimental evaluation] Experimental evaluation section: the headline result requires direct comparison to leading agent systems with concrete metrics for each dimension (e.g., success rate, token count, interaction count). Without reported controls, variance, or component ablations, the outperformance and continued-evolution claims cannot be assessed.

Authors: We agree that the experimental section must be expanded for rigorous assessment. We will revise it to include full tables with success rates, token usage, and interaction counts for GenericAgent and all baselines across tasks; report means and standard deviations over repeated trials; include statistical significance tests where appropriate; and present component-wise ablations for the four core modules. These changes will directly address the need for controls, variance, and isolation of contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in derivation or claims

full rationale

The paper describes an agent architecture built around an explicit design principle (context information density maximization) implemented via four components, with performance claims resting on empirical evaluations across external benchmarks rather than any closed mathematical derivation. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are present that would reduce the central results to inputs by construction. The self-evolution step (trajectory to SOP/code) is presented as a system feature whose correctness is assumed and tested externally; its failure would affect empirical outcomes but does not create definitional circularity within the paper's logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on engineering design choices for memory hierarchy, compression, and self-evolution whose effectiveness is not derived from first principles but asserted through empirical results.

free parameters (2)

memory hierarchy thresholds
Parameters controlling when to show summaries versus details are chosen to balance context usage but not derived from theory.
compression and truncation rules
Rules for maintaining density during long executions are implementation-specific and likely tuned.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Long-horizon performance is determined by the amount of decision-relevant information maintained within a finite context budget rather than context length itself.
Stated explicitly as the core argument in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1335 out tokens · 56736 ms · 2026-05-10T06:49:54.733648+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

[1]

Claude code.https://www.anthropic.com/product/claude-code, 2025

Anthropic. Claude code.https://www.anthropic.com/product/claude-code, 2025

2025
[2]

Introducing codex

OpenAI. Introducing codex. https://openai.com/index/introducing-codex/, 2025. Published May 16, 2025. Accessed: 2026-04-17

2025
[3]

OpenClaw-RL: Train Any Agent Simply by Talking

Xingyao Wang et al. Openclaw-rl: Training agents via interaction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10165, 2026

work page Pith review arXiv 2026
[4]

MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems

Charles Packer, Vivian Fang, Shishir G. Patil, Kevin Lin, Sarah Wooders, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. Memgpt: Towards llms as operating systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08560, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[5]

Context as a tool: Context management for long-horizon swe-agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22087, 2025

Shukai Liu, Jian Yang, Bo Jiang, Yizhi Li, Jinyang Guo, Xianglong Liu, and Bryan Dai. Context as a tool: Context management for long-horizon swe-agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22087, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:8634–8652, 2023

Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:8634–8652, 2023

2023
[7]

Expel: Llm agents are experiential learners

Andrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin, Yong-Jin Liu, and Gao Huang. Expel: Llm agents are experiential learners.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10144, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models

Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anand- kumar. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[9]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11942 , year=

Junhao Zheng, Xidi Cai, Qiuke Li, Duzhen Zhang, ZhongZhi Li, Yingying Zhang, Le Song, and Qianli Ma. Lifelongagentbench: Evaluating llm agents as lifelong learners.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11942, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts.https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03172, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[11]

Why does the effective context length of llms fall short? InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

Chenxin An, Jun Zhang, Ming Zhong, Lei Li, Shansan Gong, Yao Luo, Jingjing Xu, and Lingpeng Kong. Why does the effective context length of llms fall short? InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. ICLR 2025 Poster

2025
[12]

Llms get lost in multi-turn conversation.https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[13]

Effective context engineering for ai agents.https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/ effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents, September 2025

Aditya Rajasekaran et al. Effective context engineering for ai agents.https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/ effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents, September 2025

2025
[14]

Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory

Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. Mem0: Building production- ready ai agents with scalable long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19413, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[15]

Pan, and Kam-Fai Wong

Hongru Wang, Wenyu Huang, Yufei Wang, Yuanhao Xi, Jianqiao Lu, Huan Zhang, Nan Hu, Zeming Liu, Jeff Z. Pan, and Kam-Fai Wong. Rethinking stateful tool use in multi-turn dialogues: Benchmarks and challenges. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pages 5433–5453, Vienna, Austria, 2025

2025
[16]

Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior

Joon Sung Park, Joseph C. O’Brien, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S. Bernstein. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[17]

Memorybank: Enhancing large language models with long-term memory

Wanjun Zhong, Lianghong Guo, Qiqi Gao, He Ye, and Yanlin Wang. Memorybank: Enhancing large language models with long-term memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10250, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[18]

In prospect and retrospect: Reflective memory management for long-term personalized dialogue agents

Zhen Tan, Jun Yan, I-Hung Hsu, Rujun Han, Zifeng Wang, Long Le, Yiwen Song, Yanfei Chen, Hamid Palangi, George Lee, Anand Rajan Iyer, Tianlong Chen, Huan Liu, Chen-Yu Lee, and Tomas Pfister. In prospect and retrospect: Reflective memory management for long-term personalized dialogue agents. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for C...

2025
[19]

Telemem: Building long-term and multimodal memory for agentic ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.06037, 2026

Chunliang Chen, Ming Guan, Xiao Lin, Jiaxu Li, Qiyi Wang, Xiangyu Chen, Jixiang Luo, Changzhi Sun, Dell Zhang, and Xuelong Li. Telemem: Building long-term and multimodal memory for agentic ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.06037, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[20]

Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, Ashwin Paranjape, Michele Bevilacqua, Fabio Petroni, and Percy Liang

Nelson F. Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, Ashwin Paranjape, Michele Bevilacqua, Fabio Petroni, and Percy Liang. Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts, 2023. 28

2023
[21]

Large language models can be easily distracted by irrelevant context, 2023

Freda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales, David Dohan, Ed Chi, Nathanael Schärli, and Denny Zhou. Large language models can be easily distracted by irrelevant context, 2023

2023
[22]

Why does the effective context length of llms fall short?, 2024

Chenxin An, Jun Zhang, Ming Zhong, Lei Li, Shansan Gong, Yao Luo, Jingjing Xu, and Lingpeng Kong. Why does the effective context length of llms fall short?, 2024

2024
[23]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08119 (2025)

Subhrangshu Nandi, Arghya Datta, Rohith Nama, Udita Patel, Nikhil Vichare, Indranil Bhattacharya, Prince Grover, Shivam Asija, Giuseppe Carenini, Wei Zhang, Arushi Gupta, Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Jing Xu, Huzefa Raja, Shayan Ray, Aaron Chan, Esther Xu Fei, Gaoyuan Du, Zuhaib Akhtar, Harshita Asnani, Weian Chan, Ming Xiong, Francesco Carbone, and Jeetu Mirchandan...

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

RealFin: How Well Do LLMs Reason About Finance When Users Leave Things Unsaid?

Yuyang Dai, Yan Lin, Zhuohan Xie, and Yuxia Wang. Realfin: How well do llms reason about finance when users leave things unsaid?arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.07096, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[25]

Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents

Adyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal, Francesco Barbieri, and Yuwei Fang. Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of llm agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17753, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[26]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12373 , year=

Yichen Pan, Dehan Kong, Sida Zhou, Cheng Cui, Yifei Leng, Bing Jiang, Hangyu Liu, Yanyi Shang, Shuyan Zhou, Tongshuang Wu, and Zhengyang Wu. Webcanvas: Benchmarking web agents in online environments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12373, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Browsecomp-zh: Benchmarking web browsing ability of large language models in chinese

Peilin Zhou, Bruce Leon, Xiang Ying, Can Zhang, Yifan Shao, Qichen Ye, Dading Chong, Zhiling Jin, Chenxuan Xie, Meng Cao, Yuxin Gu, Sixin Hong, Jing Ren, Jian Chen, Chao Liu, and Yining Hua. Browsecomp-zh: Benchmarking web browsing ability of large language models in chinese.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19314, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models

Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

2023
[29]

Autogpt.https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT, 2023

Significant Gravitas. Autogpt.https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT, 2023

2023
[30]

Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework

Sirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jonathan Chen, Xiawu Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Ceyao Zhang, Jinlin Wang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, et al. Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[31]

Executable code actions elicit better LLM agents

Xingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Yizhe Zhang, Yunzhu Li, Hao Peng, and Heng Ji. Executable code actions elicit better llm agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01030, 2024. Accepted at ICML 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Devin: Ai software engineer.https://cognition.ai/blog/introducing-devin, 2024

Cognition Labs. Devin: Ai software engineer.https://cognition.ai/blog/introducing-devin, 2024

2024
[33]

Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Liber, Shunyu Yao Narasimhan, and Karthik

John Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Liber, Shunyu Yao Narasimhan, and Karthik. Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37, 2024

2024
[34]

Openhands: An open platform for ai software developers as generalist agents

Xingyao Wang, Boxuan Jiang, Ziniu Lu, Yufan Liu, Abishek Sridhar Li, Bolun Shi, Jiannan Fang, Rithvik Mohanty, Niklas Muennighoff Ponnapalli, Kaixuan Ren, et al. Openhands: An open platform for ai software developers as generalist agents. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[35]

Introducing codex.https://openai.com/index/introducing-codex/, 2025

OpenAI. Introducing codex.https://openai.com/index/introducing-codex/, 2025

2025
[36]

From mind to machine: The rise of manus ai as a fully autonomous digital agent,

Yichao Shen et al. Manus: From mind to machine.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02024, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38, 2025

Wujiang Xu et al. A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38, 2025

2025
[38]

Longllmlingua: Accelerating and enhancing llms in long context scenarios via prompt compression

Huiqiang Jiang, Qianhui Wu, Xufang Luo, Dongsheng Li, Chin-Yew Lin, Yuqing Yang, and Lili Qiu. Longllmlingua: Accelerating and enhancing llms in long context scenarios via prompt compression. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2024

2024
[39]

A survey of self-evolving agents.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2026

Zhiyuan Gao et al. A survey of self-evolving agents.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2026

2026
[40]

Agent-pro: Learning to evolve via policy-level reflection and optimization

Wenqi Zhang, Ke Tang, Hai Wu, Mengna Wang, Yongliang Shen, Guiyang Hou, Zeqi Tan, Peng Li, Yueting Zhuang, and Weiming Lu. Agent-pro: Learning to evolve via policy-level reflection and optimization. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 5348–5375, 2024. 29

2024
[41]

EvolveR: Self-Evolving LLM Agents through an Experience-Driven Lifecycle

Xuechen Wu et al. Evolver: Self-evolving llm agents through experience-driven lifecycle.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16079, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[42]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.06449 , year=

Anonymous. Flex: Continuous agent evolution via forward learning from experience.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.06449, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Agentevolver: Towards efficient self-evolving agent system.arXiv, 2025

Anonymous. Agentevolver: Towards efficient self-evolving agent system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.10395, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

15 Yuhong Cao, Jeric Lew, Jingsong Liang, Jin Cheng, and Guillaume Sartoretti

Tianyu Cai et al. Building self-evolving agents via experience-driven lifelong learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19005, 2025. 30 8 Author Contributions This project is led byJiaqing LiangandYanghua Xiao. The development of the GA and the preparation of this manuscript involve contributions from multiple authors across different aspects, including system ...

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

record candidate flagship text models and their input/output prices
[46]

test whether a single-model plan fits the budget
[47]

if not, trigger fallback and test a dual-model plan
[48]

if that still fails, output infeasible
[49]

final answer must state the primary option, whether it is feasible, whether fallback was triggered, the recommended plan, the estimated monthly cost, and the reason Required output files: cost_comparison.csv and decision_04.json. Artifact 1: Cost Comparison File cost_comparison.csv provider,model,input_cost_per_1m,output_cost_per_1m,estimated_monthly_cost...
[50]

Unable to Decide

First validate product_id. It must be resolvable and follow format P_XXXXX. If invalid, stop and output hazard_score=0 and hazard_class="Unable to Decide"
[51]

Get four component scores: - safety score from SDS label text - handling score from handling/storage guidelines - transportation score from transportation requirements - disposal score from disposal guidelines Each valid component score must be in [1,5]
[52]

Unable to Decide

Compute hazard_score: - If one component is missing or 0, replace it with the max of the other available scores. - If more than two components are missing or 0, output hazard_score=0 and hazard_- 36 class="Unable to Decide". - Otherwise hazard_score = sum of the four component scores. - Final valid range is 4 to 20
[53]

Map hazard_score to class: - 4-7 to Hazard Class A - 8-12 to Hazard Class B - 13-16 to Hazard Class C - 17-20 to Hazard Class D
[54]

Artifact 2: Full Memory

Final output must include both hazard_score and hazard_class. Artifact 2: Full Memory
[55]

Purpose To establish a standardized methodology for the systematic identification and classification of dangerous goods hazard classes through multi-source data integration and quantitative severity assessment protocols
[56]

Scope This procedure encompasses all dangerous goods shipment classification processes within the organization’s supply chain operations
[57]

Definitions SDS = Safety Data Sheet HS = Handling and Storage Guidelines TR = Transportation Requirements DG = Disposal Guidelines AIP = API Integration Protocol HCM = Hazard Classification Matrix SAS = Severity Assessment Score
[58]

Input Product ID (format: P_XXXXX) Source documentation: SDS / Handling and Storage / Transportation / Disposal API access credentials: endpoint URLs / authentication tokens / backup authentication protocols
[59]

If product ID fails format requirements, no further action should be taken

Main Procedure Validate product identification documentation completeness. If product ID fails format requirements, no further action should be taken. The hazard score should be marked as 0 and hazard class as Unable to Decide. Extract four scores, each between 1 and 5. hazard_score = safety score + handling score + transportation score + disposal score I...
[60]

Output Final hazard class designation Digital record in Hazard Classification Registry API response logs for all scoring calculations Classification audit trail documentation Final output should be in XML format with tags <hazard_score> and <hazard_class> Artifact 3: Redundant Memory You are following a standardized dangerous-goods classification procedur...
[61]

Validate documentation completeness and product identifier validity
[62]

product_id must match format P_XXXXX and be resolvable
[63]

Unable to Decide

If invalid, do not continue. Set hazard_score to 0 and hazard_class to “Unable to Decide”
[64]

Analyze SDS, handling/storage, transportation, and disposal sources separately
[65]

Derive one component score per source, each between 1 and 5
[66]

If exactly one component is missing or 0, impute it using the maximum of the other component scores
[67]

Unable to Decide

If more than two components are missing, return “Unable to Decide” and hazard_score 0
[68]

Sum the four components into a cumulative hazard_score and validate that total score lies in the range 4-20
[69]

Convert the total score into Hazard Class A / B / C / D
[70]

Return the final result in structured form with hazard_score and hazard_class, preserving an audit-ready trail. Background note: the broader SOP also mentions registry logging, API integration, source-document handling, and record retention, but the operationally decisive rules are the identifier check, missing-value handling, score summation, and class m...
[71]

build a filtered PR URL
[72]

use document.querySelectorAll(.js-issue-row) to extract PR numbers and titles
[73]

recover issue links with the rule /issues/\d+, then Fixes/Closes #\d+, then standalone #\d+
[74]

infer module names from PR title prefixes such as community:
[75]

verify documentation coverage against troubleshooting and integration paths
[76]

dump the final report with json.dump() Pitfalls:
[77]

do not use window.location.href to visit PR pages one by one
[78]

prefer browser fetch() when manual HTML collection is needed
[79]

distinguish issue links from pull-request links
[80]

different projects may use different documentation subdomains Artifact 2: Compiled Code fetch_pr_list(...) url = https://github.com/{repo}/pulls?q={filters} response = session.get(url, timeout=30) soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, ’html.parser’) pr_elements = soup.select(’.js-issue-row’) collect number, title, and url for the first limit PRs extract_pr_...

Showing first 80 references.