pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23648 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-26 · 💻 cs.RO

Safe Navigation in Unknown and Cluttered Environments via Direction-Aware Convex Free-Region Generation

Zhicheng Song , Yongjian Li , Kai Chen , Yulin Li , Fan Shi , Jun Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords safe navigationconvex free regionscluttered environmentsdirection-awarecontinuous safetyrobot motion planningincremental planning
0
0 comments X

The pith

A navigation framework generates direction-aware convex free regions to enable reliable robot motion through cluttered unknown environments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes generating convex free-space regions for robots that take into account not only surrounding obstacles but also the robot's physical size and possible directions of movement. This addresses limitations in existing approaches where regions may not allow for continued travel or fit the robot properly, particularly in narrow or cluttered areas. The method includes selecting target poses within these regions, generating trajectories, and certifying continuous safety using Lipschitz conditions along with refinements. These regions and motions are organized in a graph structure to allow for ongoing planning as new information is obtained. Experiments indicate this leads to improved navigation success in simulated cluttered settings and works on physical robots in 3D.

Core claim

The framework jointly incorporates candidate motion directions and robot geometry into the generation of convex free regions, then performs geometry-aware target pose selection and trajectory generation with Lipschitz-based continuous safety certification and local refinement, maintaining the results in a region-based graph to support incremental planning in unknown environments.

What carries the argument

Direction-aware convex free-region generation that integrates candidate motion directions and explicit robot geometry to create traversable free-space areas.

Load-bearing premise

That accounting for motion directions and robot geometry when creating free regions will produce areas that fit the robot and support useful travel, while the continuous certification ensures no collisions occur between sampled points.

What would settle it

Demonstrating a case in a narrow passage where the generated region causes the robot to get stuck or collide despite the safety certification, or showing equivalent navigation performance to standard convex region methods without direction awareness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23648 by Fan Shi, Jun Ma, Kai Chen, Yongjian Li, Yulin Li, Zhicheng Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Motivation of the proposed framework. Gray polygons denote view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the proposed navigation framework. From LiDAR point cloud observations, candidate navigation directions are extracted via range view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Safe trajectory generation via Lipschitz-based verification and local view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Free-region generation in two narrow-passage scenarios. The black view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Representative 2D environments with obstacle densities of view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative result of 3D navigation in a cluttered environment view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Convex free regions provide a structured and optimization-friendly representation of collision-free space for robot navigation in unknown and cluttered environments. However, existing methods typically enlarge local collision-free regions mainly according to surrounding obstacle geometry. In cluttered environments, such strategies may fail to generate regions that both accommodate robot geometry and preserve traversable extension along candidate motion directions, thereby limiting downstream traversal, especially in narrow passages. Even when such a region is available, safe motion generation remains challenging, because safety checking at discretized trajectory samples does not guarantee continuously collision-free motion when robot geometry is modeled explicitly. To address these issues, we propose a navigation framework that jointly incorporates candidate motion directions and robot geometry into convex free-region generation, and achieves continuously collision-free motion through continuous-safe trajectory generation. Within each region, the framework performs geometry-aware target pose selection and trajectory generation, together with Lipschitz-based continuous safety certification and local refinement. The resulting free regions and candidate motions are maintained in a region-based graph to support incremental planning. Quantitative results in cluttered 2D navigation scenarios show that the proposed method generates free regions better aligned with downstream traversal and enables reliable collision-free navigation, while additional 3D and real-world experiments on a quadrupedal robot and a UAV demonstrate the extensibility and practical applicability of the framework. The open-source project can be found at https://github.com/ZhichengSong6/FRGraph.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework for safe robot navigation in unknown cluttered environments. It generates convex free regions that are aware of candidate motion directions and the robot's geometry to better support downstream traversal, particularly in narrow passages. Safety is ensured through geometry-aware target pose selection, trajectory generation, Lipschitz-based continuous safety certification, and local refinement within each region. These are organized in a region-based graph for incremental planning. The method is evaluated quantitatively in 2D cluttered scenarios and extended to 3D simulations and real-world experiments with a quadrupedal robot and a UAV.

Significance. If the continuous safety certification holds under explicit robot geometry, the approach could significantly improve navigation reliability in cluttered settings by producing free regions that are both collision-free for the robot's shape and aligned with useful motion directions. This addresses limitations of prior methods that focus only on obstacle geometry. The open-source code availability supports reproducibility and further research.

major comments (2)
  1. [Continuous safety certification (as described in the abstract and methods)] The central claim of achieving continuously collision-free motion relies on Lipschitz-based certification and local refinement when modeling explicit robot geometry. However, it is unclear how the Lipschitz constant is derived or adapted to account for the robot's full extent and possible rotations in configuration space (e.g., SE(2) or SE(3)), as workspace Lipschitz continuity of distance functions does not automatically guarantee bounds over the entire robot body during continuous trajectories. This is load-bearing for the safety guarantee.
  2. [Evaluation section] The abstract claims 'quantitative results in cluttered 2D navigation scenarios show that the proposed method generates free regions better aligned with downstream traversal and enables reliable collision-free navigation', but without specific metrics, ablation studies, or comparisons to baselines referenced to tables or figures, the empirical validation of the core contribution is difficult to verify.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is high-level and would benefit from including at least one key equation or specific quantitative improvement to better convey the technical novelty.
  2. [Notation and figures] Ensure consistent notation for convex regions and robot geometry across text and figures for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. We will revise the manuscript to improve clarity on the safety certification details and to better reference the evaluation results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Continuous safety certification (as described in the abstract and methods)] The central claim of achieving continuously collision-free motion relies on Lipschitz-based certification and local refinement when modeling explicit robot geometry. However, it is unclear how the Lipschitz constant is derived or adapted to account for the robot's full extent and possible rotations in configuration space (e.g., SE(2) or SE(3)), as workspace Lipschitz continuity of distance functions does not automatically guarantee bounds over the entire robot body during continuous trajectories. This is load-bearing for the safety guarantee.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this important clarification needed for the safety guarantee. The manuscript applies the Lipschitz constant to the workspace signed-distance function and uses local refinement to ensure each sampled pose is collision-free for the explicit robot geometry. However, the current text does not provide an explicit derivation showing how the constant is adapted to bound the distance over the entire rigid body under continuous motion and rotations in SE(2)/SE(3). We will revise the methods section (and add a short appendix if needed) to include this derivation, for example by considering the maximum extent of the robot and configuration-space distance bounds. This revision will strengthen the presentation of the continuous-safety claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluation section] The abstract claims 'quantitative results in cluttered 2D navigation scenarios show that the proposed method generates free regions better aligned with downstream traversal and enables reliable collision-free navigation', but without specific metrics, ablation studies, or comparisons to baselines referenced to tables or figures, the empirical validation of the core contribution is difficult to verify.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit references to the supporting results. The quantitative evaluation, including alignment metrics, success rates, path efficiency, ablation studies on direction awareness, and comparisons against baselines, is presented in Section V with Tables I–III and Figures 4–6. We will update the abstract to reference these tables and figures directly (e.g., “as shown in Tables I–III and Figures 4–6”). This change improves verifiability while preserving the existing empirical content. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation chain is self-contained with no reductions to fitted parameters or self-citations

full rationale

The paper's abstract and described framework present a high-level navigation approach using direction-aware convex free-region generation, geometry-aware pose selection, Lipschitz-based certification, and region-based graph planning. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are provided that reduce by construction to inputs. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing for core claims, and the Lipschitz certification is described as a method without any shown equivalence to prior fitted results or ansatzes from the authors. The quantitative results and experiments are presented as empirical validation rather than derived predictions. This leaves the derivation independent and non-circular per the analysis criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract contains no explicit free parameters, mathematical axioms, or newly postulated entities; the contribution is described at the level of algorithmic integration and experimental demonstration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1148 out tokens · 54987 ms · 2026-05-08T05:52:03.954623+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Planning dynamically feasible trajectories for quadrotors using safe flight corridors in 3-d complex environments,

    S. Liu, M. Watterson, K. Mohta, K. Sun, S. Bhattacharya, C. J. Taylor, and V . Kumar, “Planning dynamically feasible trajectories for quadrotors using safe flight corridors in 3-d complex environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1688–1695, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Computing large convex regions of obstacle-free space through semidefinite programming,

    R. Deits and R. Tedrake, “Computing large convex regions of obstacle-free space through semidefinite programming,” inAlgo- rithmic Foundations of Robotics XI: Selected Contributions of the Eleventh International Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics. Springer, 2015, pp. 109–124

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    FASTER: Fast and safe trajectory planner for navigation in unknown environments,

    J. Tordesillas, B. T. Lopez, M. Everett, and J. P. How, “FASTER: Fast and safe trajectory planner for navigation in unknown environments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 922–938, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    FRTree planner: Robot navigation in cluttered and unknown envi- ronments with tree of free regions,

    Y . Li, Z. Song, C. Zheng, Z. Bi, K. Chen, M. Y . Wang, and J. Ma, “FRTree planner: Robot navigation in cluttered and unknown envi- ronments with tree of free regions,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 3811–3818, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Collision-free trajectory optimization in cluttered environments us- ing sums-of-squares programming,

    Y . Li, C. Zheng, K. Chen, Y . Xie, X. Tang, M. Y . Wang, and J. Ma, “Collision-free trajectory optimization in cluttered environments us- ing sums-of-squares programming,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 11 026–11 033, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Geometry- aware safety-critical local reactive controller for robot navigation in unknown and cluttered environments,

    Y . Li, X. Tang, K. Chen, C. Zheng, H. Liu, and J. Ma, “Geometry- aware safety-critical local reactive controller for robot navigation in unknown and cluttered environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automa- tion Letters, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3419–3426, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Fast iterative region inflation for computing large 2-d/3-d convex regions of obstacle-free space,

    Q. Wang, Z. Wang, M. Wang, J. Ji, Z. Han, T. Wu, R. Jin, Y . Gao, C. Xu, and F. Gao, “Fast iterative region inflation for computing large 2-d/3-d convex regions of obstacle-free space,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 41, pp. 3223–3243, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Robot navigation in unknown and cluttered workspace with dynamical system modula- tion in starshaped roadmap,

    K. Chen, H. Liu, Y . Li, J. Duan, L. Zhu, and J. Ma, “Robot navigation in unknown and cluttered workspace with dynamical system modula- tion in starshaped roadmap,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2025, pp. 10 140–10 146

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Real- time whole-body motion planning for mobile manipulators using environment-adaptive search and spatial-temporal optimization,

    C. Wu, R. Wang, M. Song, F. Gao, J. Mei, and B. Zhou, “Real- time whole-body motion planning for mobile manipulators using environment-adaptive search and spatial-temporal optimization,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 1369–1375

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Rrtx: Asymptotically optimal single- query sampling-based motion planning with quick replanning,

    M. Otte and E. Frazzoli, “Rrtx: Asymptotically optimal single- query sampling-based motion planning with quick replanning,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 797– 822, 2016

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Manageable convex region iteration without half-plane optimization for robot navigation in 2d cluttered scenes,

    Y . Qu, Y . Li, Y . Guo, W. Yi, H. Cui, Y . Lv, and S. Zhong, “Manageable convex region iteration without half-plane optimization for robot navigation in 2d cluttered scenes,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, pp. 1–8, 2026

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    Universal trajectory optimization framework for differential drive robot class,

    M. Zhang, N. Chen, H. Wang, J. Qiu, Z. Han, Q. Ren, C. Xu, F. Gao, and Y . Cao, “Universal trajectory optimization framework for differential drive robot class,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 22, pp. 13 030–13 045, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Robo-centric esdf: A fast and accurate whole-body collision evaluation tool for any- shape robotic planning,

    S. Geng, Q. Wang, L. Xie, C. Xu, Y . Cao, and F. Gao, “Robo-centric esdf: A fast and accurate whole-body collision evaluation tool for any- shape robotic planning,” in2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2023, pp. 290–297

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Mader: Trajectory planner in multiagent and dynamic environments,

    J. Tordesillas and J. P. How, “Mader: Trajectory planner in multiagent and dynamic environments,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 463–476, 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Online trajectory optimization for arbitrary-shaped mobile robots via polynomial separating hyper- surfaces,

    S. Li, Z. Song, Y . Li, Z. Bi, and J. Ma, “Online trajectory optimization for arbitrary-shaped mobile robots via polynomial separating hyper- surfaces,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.09231, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Efficient path planning in narrow passages for robots with ellipsoidal components,

    S. Ruan, K. L. Poblete, H. Wu, Q. Ma, and G. S. Chirikjian, “Efficient path planning in narrow passages for robots with ellipsoidal components,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 110– 127, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Fast-racing: An open-source strong baseline forSE(3)planning in autonomous drone racing,

    Z. Han, Z. Wang, N. Pan, Y . Lin, C. Xu, and F. Gao, “Fast-racing: An open-source strong baseline forSE(3)planning in autonomous drone racing,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 8631–8638, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    A frontier-based approach for autonomous explo- ration,

    B. Yamauchi, “A frontier-based approach for autonomous explo- ration,” inProceedings 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation CIRA’97. ’Towards New Computational Principles for Robotics and Automa- tion’, 1997, pp. 146–151

    work page 1997

  19. [19]

    A multi-resolution frontier-based planner for autonomous 3d explo- ration,

    A. Batinovic, T. Petrovic, A. Ivanovic, F. Petric, and S. Bogdan, “A multi-resolution frontier-based planner for autonomous 3d explo- ration,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4528–4535, 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Efp: Efficient frontier-based autonomous uav exploration strategy for unknown environments,

    H. Zhang, S. Wang, Y . Liu, P. Ji, R. Yu, and T. Chao, “Efp: Efficient frontier-based autonomous uav exploration strategy for unknown environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2941–2948, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Closest gap based (cg) reactive obstacle avoidance navigation for highly cluttered environments,

    M. Mujahad, D. Fischer, B. Mertsching, and H. Jaddu, “Closest gap based (cg) reactive obstacle avoidance navigation for highly cluttered environments,” in2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010, pp. 1805–1812

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Safer gap: Safe navigation of planar nonholonomic robots with a gap-based local planner,

    S. Feng, A. Abuaish, and P. A. Vela, “Safer gap: Safe navigation of planar nonholonomic robots with a gap-based local planner,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 11 034–11 041, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Potential gap: A gap-informed reactive policy for safe hierarchical navigation,

    R. Xu, S. Feng, and P. A. Vela, “Potential gap: A gap-informed reactive policy for safe hierarchical navigation,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 8325–8332, 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking,

    J. Schulman, Y . Duan, J. Ho, A. Lee, I. Awwal, H. Bradlow, J. Pan, S. Patil, K. Goldberg, and P. Abbeel, “Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1251– 1270, 2014

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Continuous-time collision avoidance for trajectory optimization in dynamic environments,

    W. Merkt, V . Ivan, and S. Vijayakumar, “Continuous-time collision avoidance for trajectory optimization in dynamic environments,” in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 7248–7255

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    A generalized continuous collision detection framework of polynomial trajectory for mobile robots in cluttered environments,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Zhang, R. Han, L. Zhang, and J. Pan, “A generalized continuous collision detection framework of polynomial trajectory for mobile robots in cluttered environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 9810–9817, 2022

    work page 2022