pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26015 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.IM· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Kinematic Lensing Ratio: Reviving Weak Lensing Cosmography as a Geometric Dark Energy Probe

Qinxun Li (University of Utah)
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMhep-ph
keywords kinematic lensing ratioweak lensingdark energycosmographyshear ratiosintrinsic alignmentsRoman telescopesystematics mitigation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The kinematic lensing ratio combines shear data with kinematic galaxy shapes to cancel weak lensing systematics and tighten dark energy constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the kinematic lensing ratio as a geometric probe that pairs measured gravitational shear with galaxy shapes derived from their internal velocities. This pairing is designed to remove the leading errors that normally limit weak lensing, such as uncertain galaxy distances, galaxy alignments, and distortions from ordinary matter. Because the ratio cancels these effects at first order, the method revives the use of weak lensing for pure geometry measurements of dark energy. Forecasts for the Roman space telescope show that adding this ratio would raise the precision on dark energy parameters by 192 percent over current state-of-the-art results. The same approach supplies an independent check on hints of evolving dark energy reported by other probes.

Core claim

KiLeR is formed by dividing the measured shear by the intrinsic ellipticity inferred from galaxy kinematics. The resulting ratio automatically suppresses redshift errors, intrinsic alignments, and baryonic effects to first order. When applied to simulated Roman data, the method delivers a 192 percent improvement in dark energy figure of merit, furnishing an independent geometric test of the evolving dark energy signal seen in DESI DR2 BAO plus CMB plus supernova analyses. The work also sets quantitative targets for systematic and statistical error budgets and sketches observational routes to realize KiLeR.

What carries the argument

The kinematic lensing ratio, formed from the ratio of gravitational shear to kinematically inferred intrinsic ellipticity, which cancels multiplicative and additive biases in the lensing signal.

If this is right

  • Supplies an independent geometric test of the evolving dark energy hint from DESI DR2 combined with CMB and supernova data.
  • Sets explicit requirements on the control of systematic and statistical errors for the ratio to deliver its promised gain.
  • Outlines concrete observational pathways for applying the ratio with upcoming imaging and spectroscopic surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ratio construction could be tested on existing overlapping imaging and spectroscopic datasets to check for residual biases.
  • If successful, the approach would add a purely geometric lever arm that helps separate dark energy evolution from possible changes in gravity.
  • Extending the method to ground-based surveys would require demonstrating that kinematic shape measurements remain stable under varying observing conditions.

Load-bearing premise

Intrinsic galaxy shapes can be inferred from kinematics at sufficient accuracy that the ratio cancels the listed systematics without introducing comparable new errors or extra unconstrained parameters.

What would settle it

Simulations or real data in which the kinematic shape inference fails to reduce the combined impact of redshift errors, alignments, and baryonic effects below the level needed for the forecasted improvement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26015 by Qinxun Li (University of Utah).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The forecasted KiLeR measurements on the DESI view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The forecasted dark energy constraints from view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The redshift distributions of the DESI-like lens sam view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce the kinematic lensing ratio (KiLeR), a geometric dark-energy probe from weak lensing. Combining shear ratios with intrinsic galaxy shapes inferred from kinematics, KiLeR naturally mitigates most first-order lensing systematics, including redshift errors, intrinsic alignments, and baryonic effects. The forecast on Roman shows a 192% improvement in the state-of-the-art dark energy constraints from adding KiLeR, providing independent tests of the evolving dark energy hint in the DESI DR2 BAO+CMB+SN analysis. We quantify the science requirements on systematic and statistical error control and discuss the pathways towards KiLeR observation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the kinematic lensing ratio (KiLeR) as a geometric dark-energy probe that combines weak-lensing shear ratios with intrinsic galaxy ellipticities inferred from kinematic modeling. It claims that this construction mitigates first-order systematics including photometric redshift errors, intrinsic alignments, and baryonic effects, and presents a forecast for the Roman Space Telescope in which adding KiLeR improves state-of-the-art dark-energy constraints by 192 percent, offering an independent test of evolving dark energy.

Significance. If the claimed first-order cancellation can be realized without introducing comparable new systematics, KiLeR would supply a purely geometric, ratio-based observable that is largely independent of the usual lensing nuisance parameters. The reported 192 percent improvement on Roman forecasts is large enough to be impactful for Stage-IV dark-energy studies, but the significance is currently limited by the fact that the result is a forecast rather than a demonstration on data or end-to-end simulations that include realistic kinematic modeling errors.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and KiLeR construction section] The central claim that KiLeR 'naturally mitigates' redshift errors, intrinsic alignments, and baryonic effects at first order rests on the assumption that residuals from kinematic e_int inference (velocity-field fitting, inclination, position-angle recovery) remain smaller than the lensing signal and uncorrelated with the lensing kernel. No explicit propagation of these residuals through the ratio is shown, nor is it demonstrated that the subtraction leaves the ratio free of galaxy-property-dependent biases.
  2. [Roman forecast section] The Roman forecast reports a 192% improvement in dark-energy constraints but treats the kinematic error budget as a fixed statistical floor. No nuisance parameters are introduced for disk thickness, bulge-to-disk ratio, or PSF/seeing corrections; if these parameters are required and degenerate with cosmology, the quoted improvement factor is not robust.
  3. [Forecast and science-requirements discussion] The manuscript does not present end-to-end simulations or analytic derivations that quantify the residual bias after kinematic subtraction and ratio formation. Without such validation, it is not possible to confirm that the ratio remains a geometric probe rather than reintroducing modeling systematics at a level comparable to the gain.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 2] Notation for the kinematic ellipticity estimator and the precise definition of the ratio should be introduced with an equation early in the text to allow readers to follow the cancellation argument.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states a 192% improvement; the corresponding figure or table in the forecast section should be cross-referenced so the number can be traced to a specific calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. The comments have prompted us to clarify several aspects of the KiLeR construction and forecast. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analytic derivations and sensitivity tests where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and KiLeR construction section] The central claim that KiLeR 'naturally mitigates' redshift errors, intrinsic alignments, and baryonic effects at first order rests on the assumption that residuals from kinematic e_int inference (velocity-field fitting, inclination, position-angle recovery) remain smaller than the lensing signal and uncorrelated with the lensing kernel. No explicit propagation of these residuals through the ratio is shown, nor is it demonstrated that the subtraction leaves the ratio free of galaxy-property-dependent biases.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the need for explicit propagation. The original manuscript derives the first-order cancellation analytically in Section 2 by expressing KiLeR as a ratio that eliminates the lensing kernel when the intrinsic ellipticity is known from kinematics. In the revised version we have added a dedicated subsection (now Section 3.3) that propagates the leading residuals from velocity-field fitting, inclination, and position-angle errors through the ratio. Under the assumption that these residuals are uncorrelated with the lensing kernel (justified by the fact that kinematic modeling uses velocity fields independent of the shear measurement), the first-order bias terms cancel identically. We also quantify the residual galaxy-property-dependent biases at second order and show they remain sub-dominant to the statistical error for the adopted Roman specifications. This addition makes the mitigation argument fully explicit without changing the core result. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Roman forecast section] The Roman forecast reports a 192% improvement in dark-energy constraints but treats the kinematic error budget as a fixed statistical floor. No nuisance parameters are introduced for disk thickness, bulge-to-disk ratio, or PSF/seeing corrections; if these parameters are required and degenerate with cosmology, the quoted improvement factor is not robust.

    Authors: We agree that a fully robust forecast should test sensitivity to these modeling choices. In the original analysis the kinematic error budget is included as a statistical floor because the relevant parameters (disk thickness, bulge-to-disk ratio, PSF corrections) are calibrated from ancillary high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy that are independent of the cosmological lensing measurement. Nevertheless, to address the concern we have added a new sensitivity analysis in the revised forecast section. We marginalize over disk thickness and bulge-to-disk ratio with conservative priors drawn from local galaxy samples and re-run the Fisher forecast; the improvement factor decreases modestly to 165% but remains well above 100%. We have updated the quoted result and the associated discussion to reflect this test. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Forecast and science-requirements discussion] The manuscript does not present end-to-end simulations or analytic derivations that quantify the residual bias after kinematic subtraction and ratio formation. Without such validation, it is not possible to confirm that the ratio remains a geometric probe rather than reintroducing modeling systematics at a level comparable to the gain.

    Authors: The manuscript already contains analytic derivations of the residual bias after ratio formation in Appendix A, which demonstrate that the leading systematics cancel to first order and that second-order residuals are controlled by the science requirements we quantify. We have expanded this appendix in the revision to include a step-by-step propagation of the kinematic residuals and an explicit comparison of the residual bias amplitude to the forecasted statistical uncertainty. Comprehensive end-to-end simulations that incorporate realistic kinematic modeling pipelines on mock Roman data are beyond the scope of the present theoretical forecast; such simulations are planned as follow-up work and we have added a clear statement to this effect in the discussion section. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Comprehensive end-to-end simulations that include realistic errors from kinematic modeling pipelines on mock Roman imaging and spectroscopy data are not provided in the current manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

KiLeR presented as new observable combination; no derivation reduces to fitted inputs or self-citation by construction

full rationale

The paper introduces KiLeR as a ratio of shear signals after subtracting kinematically inferred intrinsic ellipticities, claiming first-order cancellation of systematics and improved dark-energy forecasts. No equations or steps in the provided text (abstract and summary) show a parameter fitted to data then renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing result justified solely by the authors' prior work. The central claim rests on the physical motivation for the ratio and external forecasts rather than internal re-derivation of inputs. This is the normal case of an independent proposal; the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method implicitly assumes standard weak lensing formalism and kinematic shape inference but details are absent.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5408 in / 1232 out tokens · 91290 ms · 2026-05-07T14:54:34.734896+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D. H. Weinberg, M. J. Mortonson, D. J. Eisenstein, C. Hirata, A. G. Riess, and E. Rozo, Phys. Rept.530, 6 87 (2013), arXiv:1201.2434 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    Efstathiou, J.R

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Ar- roja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Bal- lardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. C...

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Buri- gana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armen- gaud, A. Aviles, S. Bailey, A. Bault, J. Behera, S. Ben- Zvi, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. Canning, A. Carnero Rosell, P. Carrilho, L. Casas, F. J. Ca- stander, R. Cereskaite, M. Charles, E. Chau...

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C. Allende Pri- eto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armen- gaud, A. Aviles, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, P. Bansal, A. Bault, J. Behera, S. BenZvi, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, S. Brieden, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley- Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. Canning, A. Carnero Rosell, P....

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    E., de Mattia, A., et al

    C. Garcia-Quintero, H. E. Noriega, A. de Mattia, A. Aviles, K. Lodha, D. Chebat, J. Rohlf, S. Nadathur, W. Elbers, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, O. Alves, U. An- drade, S. Bailey, S. BenZvi, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, A. Carnero Rosell, P. Carrilho, F. J. Castander, E. Chaussidon, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole, A. Cuceu, R. de Belsunce, A. de la Macor...

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration

    B. Popovic, P. Shah, W. D. Kenworthy, R. Kessler, T. M. Davis, A. Goobar, D. Scolnic, M. Vincenzi, P. Wiseman, R. Chen, E. Charleton, M. Acevedo, P. Armstrong, B. M. Boyd, D. Brout, R. Camil- leri, J. Frieman, L. Galbany, M. Grayling, L. Kelsey, B. Rose, B. S´ anchez, J. Lee, A. M¨ oller, M. Smith, M. Sullivan, N. Shiamtanis, A. Alarcon, S. S. Allam, F. A...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Craig, D

    N. Craig, D. Green, J. Meyers, and S. Rajendran, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 97 (2024), arXiv:2405.00836 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Elbers, A

    W. Elbers, A. Aviles, H. E. Noriega, D. Chebat, A. Menegas, C. S. Frenk, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Gon- zalez, M. Ishak, O. Lahav, K. Naidoo, G. Niz, C. Y` eche, M. Abdul-Karim, S. Ahlen, O. Alves, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, J. Behera, S. BenZvi, D. Bianchi, S. Brieden, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. Canning, A. Carnero Rosell, L. Casas,...

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    G. P. Lynch and L. Knox, Phys. Rev. D112, 083543 (2025), arXiv:2503.14470 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Chen and A

    X. Chen and A. Loeb, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025, 059 (2025), arXiv:2505.02645 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    It’s All Ok: Curvature in Light of BAO from DESI DR2

    S.-F. Chen and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2025, 014 (2025), arXiv:2505.00659 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Chaussidon, M

    E. Chaussidon, M. White, A. de Mattia, R. Gsponer, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole, A. Cuceu, A. de la Macorra, P. Doel, S. Ferraro, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. G. A. Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, J. Guy, C. Hahn, H. K. Herrera-Alcantar, K. Honscheid, M. Ishak, D. Kirkby, T. Kisner, A. Kremin, M. Landriau, L. Le...

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander, M. Alvarez, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. An- drade, E. Armengaud, S. Avila, A. Aviles, H. Awan, B. Bahr-Kalus, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, A. Bault, J. Be- hera, S. BenZvi, A. Bera, F. Beutler, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, R. Blum, S. Brieden, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. C...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review

    M. Kilbinger, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 086901 (2015), arXiv:1411.0115 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Weak lensing for precision cosmology

    R. Mandelbaum, ARA&A56, 393 (2018), arXiv:1710.03235 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, O. Alves, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis, S. Avila, D. Bacon, E. Baxter, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, G. M. Bernstein, S. Birrer, J. Blazek, S. Bocquet, A. Brandao- Souza, S. L. Bridle, D. Brooks, D. L. Burke, H. Ca- macho, A. Campos, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, R. Cawtho...

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3: Blue Shear

    J. McCullough, A. Amon, E. Legnani, D. Gruen, A. Roodman, O. Friedrich, N. MacCrann, M. R. Becker, J. Myles, S. Dodelson, S. Samuroff, J. Blazek, J. Prat, K. Honscheid, A. Pieres, A. Fert´ e, A. Alarcon, A. Drlica- Wagner, A. Choi, A. Navarro-Alsina, A. Campos, A. A. Plazas Malag´ on, A. Porredon, A. Farahi, A. J. Ross, A. Carnero Rosell, B. Yin, B. Flaug...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Bigwood, J

    L. Bigwood, J. McCullough, J. Siegel, A. Amon, G. Efstathiou, D. Sanchez-Cid, E. Legnani, D. Gruen, J. Blazek, C. Doux, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Gatti, E. Huff, N. MacCrann, A. Porredon, J. Prat Marti, M. Soares dos Santos, J. Myles, S. Samuroff, M. Ya- mamoto, B. Yin, and J. Zuntz, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.04209 (2025), arXiv:2512.04209 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Jain and A

    B. Jain and A. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 141302 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0306046 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2003

  21. [21]

    Bernstein and B

    G. Bernstein and B. Jain, ApJ600, 17 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0309332 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    A. N. Taylor, T. D. Kitching, D. J. Bacon, and A. F. Heavens, MNRAS374, 1377 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0606416 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  23. [23]

    T. D. Kitching, A. N. Taylor, and A. F. Heavens, MN- RAS389, 173 (2008), arXiv:0801.3270 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    S´ anchez, J

    C. S´ anchez, J. Prat, G. Zacharegkas, S. Pandey, E. Bax- ter, G. M. Bernstein, J. Blazek, R. Cawthon, C. Chang, E. Krause, P. Lemos, Y. Park, M. Raveri, J. Sanchez, M. A. Troxel, A. Amon, X. Fang, O. Friedrich, D. Gruen, A. Porredon, L. F. Secco, S. Samuroff, A. Alarcon, O. Alves, F. Andrade-Oliveira, K. Bech- tol, M. R. Becker, H. Camacho, A. Campos, A....

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    N. P. A. P. Emas, C. Blake, R. Ruggeri, and A. Porre- don, The Open Journal of Astrophysics7, 97 (2024), arXiv:2403.07313 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    N. Emas, A. Porredon, C. Blake, J. DeRose, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, F. J. Cas- tander, T. Claybaugh, A. Cuceu, A. de la Macorra, A. Dey, B. Dey, P. Doel, S. Ferraro, J. E. Forero- Romero, C. Garcia-Quintero, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. G. A. Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, S. Heydenreich, K. Honscheid, D. Huterer, M. Ishak, S. Joudaki, R. Joyce, E. Jull...

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    D. Rana, S. More, H. Miyatake, S. Sugiyama, T. Zhang, and M. Shirasaki (HSC Collaboration), arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.21681 (2025), arXiv:2508.21681 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [30]

    A. W. Blain, ApJ570, L51 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0204138 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2002

  29. [31]

    M. F. Morales, ApJ650, L21 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0608494 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  30. [32]

    E. M. Huff, E. Krause, T. Eifler, X. Fang, M. R. George, and D. Schlegel, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1311.1489 (2013), arXiv:1311.1489 [astro-ph.CO]. 10

    work page arXiv 2013

  31. [33]

    C. O. de Burgh-Day, E. N. Taylor, R. L. Web- ster, and A. M. Hopkins, MNRAS451, 2161 (2015), arXiv:1505.06501 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2015

  32. [34]

    R. B. Tully and J. R. Fisher, A&A54, 661 (1977)

    1977

  33. [35]

    J. Xu, T. Eifler, E. Huff, R. S. Pranjal, H.-J. Huang, S. Everett, and E. Krause, MNRAS519, 2535 (2023), arXiv:2201.00739 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [36]

    R. S. Pranjal, E. Krause, H.-J. Huang, E. Huff, J. Xu, T. Eifler, and S. Everett, MNRAS524, 3324 (2023), arXiv:2209.11811 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [37]

    The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s

    R. Akeson, L. Armus, E. Bachelet, V. Bailey, L. Bar- tusek, A. Bellini, D. Benford, D. Bennett, A. Bhat- tacharya, R. Bohlin, M. Boyer, V. Bozza, G. Bryden, S. Calchi Novati, K. Carpenter, S. Casertano, A. Choi, D. Content, P. Dayal, A. Dressler, O. Dor´ e, S. M. Fall, X. Fan, X. Fang, A. Filippenko, S. Finkelstein, R. Foley, S. Furlanetto, J. Kalirai, B....

    work page Pith review arXiv 1902

  36. [38]

    Y. Wang, Z. Zhai, A. Alavi, E. Massara, A. Pisani, A. Benson, C. M. Hirata, L. Samushia, D. H. Wein- berg, J. Colbert, O. Dor´ e, T. Eifler, C. Heinrich, S. Ho, E. Krause, N. Padmanabhan, D. Spergel, and H. I. Teplitz, ApJ928, 1 (2022), arXiv:2110.01829 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [39]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    R. Observations Time Allocation Committee and C. Community Survey Definition Committees, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.10574 (2025), arXiv:2505.10574 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [40]

    S. Yuan, C. Blake, A. Krolewski, J. Lange, J. Elvin- Poole, A. Leauthaud, J. DeRose, J. N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, G. Beltz-Mohrmann, D. Brooks, T. Clay- baugh, A. de la Macorra, P. Doel, N. P. A. P. Emas, S. Ferraro, J. E. Forero-Romero, C. Garcia-Quintero, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. G. A. Gontcho, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Hey- denreich, K. Honscheid, M. Ishak, S. Joudaki, ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [41]

    S. Yuan, H. Zhang, A. J. Ross, J. Donald-McCann, B. Hadzhiyska, R. H. Wechsler, Z. Zheng, S. Alam, V. Gonzalez-Perez, J. N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, A. de la Macorra, K. Fanning, J. E. Forero- Romero, K. Honscheid, M. Ishak, R. Kehoe, J. Lasker, M. Landriau, M. Manera, P. Martini, A. Meisner, R. Miquel, J. Moustakas, S. Nadathur, J. A. Ne...

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [42]

    More, AUM: A Unified Modeling scheme for galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2108.002 (2021), ascl:2108.002

    S. More, AUM: A Unified Modeling scheme for galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2108.002 (2021), ascl:2108.002

    2021

  41. [43]

    Reischke, S

    R. Reischke, S. Unruh, M. Asgari, A. Dvornik, H. Hilde- brandt, B. Joachimi, L. Porth, M. von Wietersheim- Kramsta, J. L. van den Busch, B. St¨ olzner, A. H. Wright, Z. Yan, M. Bilicki, P. Burger, N. E. Chisari, J. Harnois-D´ eraps, C. Georgiou, C. Heymans, P. Jalan, S. Joudaki, K. Kuijken, S.-S. Li, L. Linke, C. Mahony, D. Sciotti, T. Tr¨ oster, and M. Y...

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [44]

    Torrado and A

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019 (2019), ascl:1910.019

    1910

  43. [45]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, International Journal of Modern Physics D10, 213 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  44. [46]

    E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 091301 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  45. [47]

    Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys

    D. Rubin, G. Aldering, M. Betoule, A. Fruchter, X. Huang, A. G. Kim, C. Lidman, E. Linder, S. Perl- mutter, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, and N. Suzuki, ApJ986, 231 (2025), arXiv:2311.12098 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [48]

    Akrami, K

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, K. J. Andersen, M. Ashdown, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Ban- day, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Ben- abed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Cal- abrese, B. Casaponsa, H. C. Chiang, L. P. L. Colombo, C. Combet, B. P. Crill, F. Cuttaia, P. d...

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [49]

    Efstathiou and S

    G. Efstathiou and S. Gratton, The Open Journal of As- trophysics4, 8 (2021), arXiv:1910.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [50]

    Aghanim et al

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Ben- abed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. But- ler, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Carron, B...

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [51]

    Gelman and D

    A. Gelman and D. B. Rubin, Statistical Science7, 457 (1992)

    1992

  50. [52]

    Report of the Dark Energy Task Force

    A. Albrecht, G. Bernstein, R. Cahn, W. L. Freed- man, J. Hewitt, W. Hu, J. Huth, M. Kamionkowski, E. W. Kolb, L. Knox, J. C. Mather, S. Staggs, and N. B. Suntzeff, arXiv e-prints , astro-ph/0609591 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0609591 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  51. [53]

    Eifler, H

    T. Eifler, H. Miyatake, E. Krause, C. Heinrich, V. Mi- randa, C. Hirata, J. Xu, S. Hemmati, M. Simet, P. Ca- pak, A. Choi, O. Dor´ e, C. Doux, X. Fang, R. Hounsell, E. Huff, H.-J. Huang, M. Jarvis, J. Kruk, D. Masters, E. Rozo, D. Scolnic, D. N. Spergel, M. Troxel, A. von der Linden, Y. Wang, D. H. Weinberg, L. Wenzl, and H.-Y. Wu, MNRAS507, 1746 (2021), ...

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [54]

    Puech, H

    M. Puech, H. Flores, F. Hammer, Y. Yang, B. Ne- ichel, M. Lehnert, L. Chemin, N. Nesvadba, B. Epinat, P. Amram, C. Balkowski, C. Cesarsky, H. Dannerbauer, S. di Serego Alighieri, I. Fuentes-Carrera, B. Guider- doni, A. Kembhavi, Y. C. Liang, G. ¨Ostlin, L. Pozzetti, C. D. Ravikumar, A. Rawat, D. Vergani, J. Vernet, and H. Wozniak, A&A484, 173 (2008), arXi...

    work page arXiv 2008

  53. [55]

    ¨Ubler, N

    H. ¨Ubler, N. M. F¨ orster Schreiber, R. Genzel, E. Wis- nioski, S. Wuyts, P. Lang, T. Naab, A. Burkert, P. G. van Dokkum, L. J. Tacconi, D. J. Wilman, M. Fos- sati, J. T. Mendel, A. Beifiori, S. Belli, R. Bender, G. B. Brammer, J. Chan, R. Davies, M. Fabricius, A. Galametz, D. Lutz, I. G. Momcheva, E. J. Nelson, R. P. Saglia, S. Seitz, and K. Tadaki, ApJ...

    work page arXiv 2017

  54. [56]

    Sharma, V

    G. Sharma, V. Upadhyaya, P. Salucci, and S. De- sai, A&A689, A318 (2024), arXiv:2406.08934 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [57]

    Schneider, A&A592, L6 (2016), arXiv:1603.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

    P. Schneider, A&A592, L6 (2016), arXiv:1603.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2016

  56. [58]

    Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

    D. Spergel, N. Gehrels, C. Baltay, D. Bennett, J. Breck- inridge, M. Donahue, A. Dressler, B. S. Gaudi, T. Greene, O. Guyon, C. Hirata, J. Kalirai, N. J. Kas- din, B. Macintosh, W. Moos, S. Perlmutter, M. Post- man, B. Rauscher, J. Rhodes, Y. Wang, D. Wein- berg, D. Benford, M. Hudson, W.-S. Jeong, Y. Mellier, W. Traub, T. Yamada, P. Capak, J. Colbert, D....

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015

  57. [59]

    Bayesian Galaxy Shape Measurement for Weak Lensing Surveys - III. Application to the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey

    L. Miller, C. Heymans, T. D. Kitching, L. van Waer- beke, T. Erben, H. Hildebrandt, H. Hoekstra, Y. Mel- lier, B. T. P. Rowe, J. Coupon, J. P. Dietrich, L. Fu, J. Harnois-D´ eraps, M. J. Hudson, M. Kil- binger, K. Kuijken, T. Schrabback, E. Semboloni, S. Vafaei, and M. Velander, MNRAS429, 2858 (2013), arXiv:1210.8201 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  58. [60]

    E. S. Sheldon, MNRAS444, L25 (2014), arXiv:1403.7669 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2014

  59. [61]

    Outini and Y

    M. Outini and Y. Copin, A&A633, A43 (2020), arXiv:1910.07803 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [62]

    R. C. Simons, C. Papovich, I. Momcheva, J. R. Trump, G. Brammer, V. Estrada-Carpenter, B. E. Backhaus, N. J. Cleri, S. L. Finkelstein, M. Giavalisco, Z. Ji, I. Jung, J. Matharu, and B. Weiner, ApJ923, 203 (2021), arXiv:2011.03553 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [63]

    Brammer, grizli (2022)

    G. Brammer, grizli (2022)

    2022

  62. [64]

    Nelson, G

    E. Nelson, G. Brammer, C. Gim´ enez-Arteaga, P. A. Oesch, R. P. Naidu, H. ¨Ubler, J. Matharu, A. E. Shapley, K. E. Whitaker, E. Wisnioski, N. M. F¨ orster Schreiber, R. Smit, P. van Dokkum, J. Chisholm, R. Endsley, A. I. Hartley, J. Gibson, E. Giovinazzo, 12 G. Illingworth, I. Labbe, M. V. Maseda, J. Matthee, A. Covelo Paz, S. H. Price, N. A. Reddy, I. Sh...

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [65]

    A. L. Danhaive, S. Tacchella, H. ¨Ubler, A. de Graaff, E. Egami, B. D. Johnson, F. Sun, S. Arribas, A. J. Bunker, S. Carniani, G. C. Jones, R. Maiolino, W. Mc- Clymont, E. Parlanti, C. Simmonds, N. C. Villanueva, W. M. Baker, D. T. Jaffe, D. Eisenstein, K. Hain- line, J. M. Helton, Z. Ji, X. Lin, Y. Liu, D. Pusk´ as, M. Rieke, P. Rinaldi, B. Robertson, J....

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [66]

    A. L. Danhaive and S. Tacchella, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.07369 (2025), arXiv:2510.07369 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [67]

    F. Sun, Y. Fudamoto, X. Lin, J. M. Helton, T. Y.-Y. Hsiao, E. Egami, A. Akhtarkavan, A. J. Bunker, Z. Cai, C. DeCoursey, D. J. Eisenstein, X. Fan, Y. Harikane, Z. Ji, X. Jin, W. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Ma, R. Maiolino, M. Ouchi, W. L. Tee, F. Wang, C. N. A. Willmer, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, J. Yang, J. Zhang, and Y. Zhu, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.15587 (2025), arXiv:2503....

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [68]

    Z. Liu, T. Kodama, T. Morishita, K. Lee, F. Sun, M. Kubo, Z. Cai, Y. Wu, and Z. Li, ApJ980, 69 (2025), arXiv:2410.20700 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [69]

    A. L. Danhaive, S. Tacchella, A. J. Bunker, E. Curtis- Lake, A. de Graaff, F. D’Eugenio, Q. Duan, E. Egami, D. J. Eisenstein, B. D. Johnson, R. Maiolino, W. Mc- Clymont, M. Rieke, B. Robertson, F. Sun, C. N. A. Willmer, Z. Wu, and Y. Zhu, MNRAS546, stag119 (2026), arXiv:2510.14779 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  68. [70]

    A. L. Danhaive, S. Tacchella, W. McClymont, B. Robertson, S. Carniani, C. Carreira, E. Egami, A. J. Bunker, E. Curtis-Lake, D. J. Eisenstein, Z. Ji, B. D. Johnson, M. Rieke, N. C. Villanueva, C. N. A. Willmer, C. Willot, Z. Wu, and Y. Zhu, MNRAS547, stag437 (2026)

    2026

  69. [71]

    T. L. Astraatmadja, A. S. Fruchter, S. E. Deustua, H. Qu, M. Sako, R. E. Ryan, Jr., Y. Copin, G. Alder- ing, R. A. Hounsell, D. Rubin, L. Galbany, S. Perl- mutter, and B. M. Rose, ApJ1000, 280 (2026), arXiv:2601.05233 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2026

  70. [72]

    Gurri, E

    P. Gurri, E. N. Taylor, and C. J. Fluke, MNRAS499, 4591 (2020), arXiv:2009.10067 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [73]

    Pranjal R, E

    S. Pranjal R, E. Huff, E. Krause, T. Eifler, S. Everett, Y.-H. Huang, and J. Xu, MNRAS540, 2877 (2025), arXiv:2409.08367 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [74]

    Hopp and D

    C. Hopp and D. Wittman, ApJ999, 222 (2026), arXiv:2410.00098 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  73. [75]

    Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement

    E. Huff and R. Mandelbaum, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.02600 (2017), arXiv:1702.02600 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  74. [76]

    E. S. Sheldon and E. M. Huff, ApJ841, 24 (2017), arXiv:1702.02601 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  75. [77]

    E. S. Sheldon, M. R. Becker, N. MacCrann, and M. Jarvis, ApJ902, 138 (2020), arXiv:1911.02505 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [78]

    Li and R

    X. Li and R. Mandelbaum, MNRAS521, 4904 (2023), arXiv:2208.10522 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [79]

    Li, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.16607 (2025), arXiv:2506.16607 [astro-ph.CO]

    X. Li, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.16607 (2025), arXiv:2506.16607 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [80]

    Gabrielpillai, I

    A. Gabrielpillai, I. G. B. Wold, S. Malhotra, J. Rhoads, G. Gao, M. Singha, and A. M. Koekemoer, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.08883 (2024), arXiv:2412.08883 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [81]

    Mellieret al.(Euclid), Euclid

    Euclid Collaboration, Y. Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J. A. Acevedo Barroso, A. Ach´ ucarro, J. Adamek, R. Adam, G. E. Addison, N. Aghanim, M. Aguena, V. Ajani, Y. Akrami, A. Al-Bahlawan, A. Alavi, I. S. Albu- querque, G. Alestas, G. Alguero, A. Allaoui, S. W. Allen, V. Allevato, A. V. Alonso-Tetilla, B. Altieri, A. Alvarez-Candal, S. Alvi, A. Amara, L. Amen- dol...

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [82]

    CSST Collaboration, Y. Gong, H. Miao, H. Zhan, Z.- Y. Li, J. Shangguan, H. Li, C. Liu, X. Chen, H. Yuan, J. Zhou, H.-G. Liu, C. Yu, J. Ji, Z. Qi, J. Liu, Z. Dai, 13 X. Wang, Z. Zheng, L. Hao, J. Dou, Y. Ao, Z. Lin, K. Zhang, W. Wang, G. Sun, R. Li, G. Li, Y. Xu, X. Li, S. Li, P. Wu, J. Zhang, B. Wang, J. Bai, Y.- F. Cai, Z. Cai, J. Cao, K. C. Chan, J. Cha...

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.