arxiv: 2604.27568 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Gravitational wave constraints on the Paneitz operator

Robin Valtin , Alexander Ganz , Guillem Dom\`enech

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 09:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

keywords Paneitz operatormimetic gravitygravitational wavesconformal invariancemodified gravityfourth-order operatorinstabilities

0 comments

The pith

In four dimensions the Paneitz operator on scalars belongs to extended mimetic gravity and is bounded by gravitational-wave speeds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the Paneitz operator, a fourth-order conformally invariant differential operator, when acting on a scalar field in four dimensions, falls inside the class of extended mimetic gravity theories. This placement immediately transfers the known instabilities of mimetic models to the Paneitz construction. To extract concrete bounds the authors add the Einstein-Hilbert term and assume higher-derivative corrections remove the instabilities; the resulting theory then predicts a modified speed for gravitational waves that can be compared with observations. Readers care because the Paneitz operator has been explored as a tool for vacuum-energy cancellation, and any such use must now respect the wave-speed limits imposed by gravitational-wave data.

Core claim

In four dimensions, the Paneitz operator acting on a scalar field falls within the class of extended mimetic gravity theories. Thus, it exhibits the usual instabilities of mimetic gravity. Assuming such instabilities are cured by higher derivative terms, we derive constraints on the Paneitz operator from a modified propagation speed of gravitational waves, after including the Einstein-Hilbert action in the mimetic gravity formulation.

What carries the argument

The Paneitz operator viewed as the scalar-sector action of an extended mimetic gravity theory, whose fourth-order conformal structure produces both the instabilities and the altered gravitational-wave propagation speed once the Einstein-Hilbert term is restored.

If this is right

The Paneitz operator inherits the ghost or gradient instabilities characteristic of mimetic gravity unless regularized by higher derivatives.
Gravitational waves acquire a propagation speed different from light, supplying an observable signature that can be used to bound the operator coefficients.
Addition of the Einstein-Hilbert term alters the effective metric dynamics and tightens the allowed range for the Paneitz parameters.
Any cosmological model that employs the Paneitz operator to cancel vacuum energy must satisfy the resulting gravitational-wave speed constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the required higher-derivative stabilizers destroy the conformal invariance that motivated the Paneitz operator, its use for vacuum-energy problems becomes problematic.
The same mapping technique could be applied to other higher-order conformally invariant operators to test whether they also embed into mimetic-like theories.
Future gravitational-wave observatories with improved sensitivity to speed deviations could further shrink the viable parameter space for the Paneitz operator.

Load-bearing premise

That higher-derivative corrections can remove the mimetic instabilities while leaving the equivalence between the Paneitz operator and the mimetic scalar sector intact.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of gravitational-wave propagation speed exactly equal to the speed of light, in a regime where the model with nonzero Paneitz coefficients predicts a measurable deviation, would force the coefficients to zero or rule out the claimed equivalence.

read the original abstract

The Paneitz operator is a dimension-4 conformally invariant fourth-order differential operator that has recently attracted attention for possible cancellations of the vacuum energy. We show that, in four dimensions, the Paneitz operator acting on a scalar field falls within the class of extended mimetic gravity theories. Thus, it exhibits the usual instabilities of mimetic gravity. Assuming such instabilities are cured by higher derivative terms, we derive constraints on the Paneitz operator from a modified propagation speed of gravitational waves, after including the Einstein-Hilbert action in the mimetic gravity formulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper maps the Paneitz operator to extended mimetic gravity and extracts gravitational wave constraints, but the result rests on an unverified assumption that higher derivatives cure the instabilities.

read the letter

The paper maps the Paneitz operator acting on a scalar to the class of extended mimetic gravity theories in four dimensions. From that identification it notes the standard mimetic instabilities and assumes higher derivative terms remove them, adds the Einstein-Hilbert action, and derives bounds on the Paneitz coefficients from a modified gravitational wave speed. That mapping is the genuinely new piece; I do not recall it in prior work on the Paneitz operator or on mimetic models. The logic once the identification is granted is straightforward and stays inside the usual mimetic framework for tensor perturbations. The paper is clear about the steps it takes and does not overclaim the result beyond the assumption. The main limitation is exactly the curing assumption. No explicit form for the higher derivative terms appears, nor is there a stability analysis showing that ghosts or gradient instabilities are removed while leaving the tensor speed shift intact. Without that check the derived constraints on the Paneitz operator are conditional rather than robust. Adding the Einstein-Hilbert term by hand also introduces some model dependence that is not purely dictated by the Paneitz operator itself. This work is aimed at people already working on mimetic gravity or on conformal higher-derivative operators who want an observational angle. A specialist in those areas could check the mapping and the perturbation calculation quickly. It shows honest engagement with the literature and the limitations of the approach. The paper deserves a serious referee to verify the identification and to assess whether the stability assumption can be made concrete. I would send it for review.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in four dimensions the Paneitz operator acting on a scalar field belongs to the class of extended mimetic gravity theories and therefore inherits their instabilities. Conditional on the assumption that higher-derivative terms cure these instabilities, the Einstein-Hilbert action is added and constraints on the Paneitz operator are derived from the resulting modification to the propagation speed of gravitational waves.

Significance. If the equivalence to mimetic gravity is shown rigorously and the higher-derivative stabilization can be demonstrated to leave the tensor-sector analysis intact, the work would connect a conformally invariant fourth-order operator (of interest for vacuum-energy cancellation) to observational bounds from gravitational-wave speed. This linkage could be of interest to both modified-gravity phenomenology and mathematical-physics applications of the Paneitz operator.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding derivation section): the asserted equivalence of the Paneitz operator to extended mimetic gravity is stated without derivation steps, explicit Lagrangian terms, or equations showing how the fourth-order operator maps onto the mimetic formulation or produces the usual ghost/gradient instabilities.
[GW constraints derivation] Section deriving the GW constraints: the reported bounds on the Paneitz coefficient are obtained only after assuming that unspecified higher-derivative terms remove the mimetic instabilities while preserving the claimed modification to the tensor propagation speed. No explicit stabilizing Lagrangian, stability analysis, or check that the tensor sector remains unaltered is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the final constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and rigor on the equivalence and assumptions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding derivation section): the asserted equivalence of the Paneitz operator to extended mimetic gravity is stated without derivation steps, explicit Lagrangian terms, or equations showing how the fourth-order operator maps onto the mimetic formulation or produces the usual ghost/gradient instabilities.

Authors: We agree the original presentation was concise. The revised manuscript expands the abstract and adds a dedicated subsection with explicit steps: we rewrite the Paneitz operator acting on the scalar in terms of the mimetic constraint using auxiliary fields, obtain the equivalent extended mimetic Lagrangian, and derive the ghost and gradient instabilities from the resulting kinetic terms. The mapping equations are now shown in detail. revision: yes
Referee: [GW constraints derivation] Section deriving the GW constraints: the reported bounds on the Paneitz coefficient are obtained only after assuming that unspecified higher-derivative terms remove the mimetic instabilities while preserving the claimed modification to the tensor propagation speed. No explicit stabilizing Lagrangian, stability analysis, or check that the tensor sector remains unaltered is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the final constraints.

Authors: The assumption is indeed central. In revision we add a paragraph outlining candidate higher-derivative terms (e.g., quartic derivatives of the mimetic scalar) that can remove scalar instabilities at leading order, together with a scaling argument that these terms do not alter the tensor dispersion relation at the frequencies probed by gravitational-wave observations. A full stability analysis of the completed theory lies outside the present scope and is noted as such. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain.

full rationale

The paper first maps the Paneitz operator to an extended mimetic gravity action by direct operator comparison, notes the standard mimetic instabilities, states an explicit assumption that higher-derivative terms cure them, adds the Einstein-Hilbert term, computes the resulting tensor propagation speed from the combined action, and extracts parameter constraints by confronting that speed with data. Each step is a forward derivation from the constructed Lagrangian; the final constraints are not equivalent to the input assumptions or to any fitted quantity by construction. No self-citation chain, self-definitional equivalence, or renaming of known results is required for the central claim. The conditional assumption is acknowledged as such and does not render the speed modification tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the stated equivalence to mimetic gravity and an ad hoc assumption that higher derivative terms stabilize the theory without changing the GW analysis; no new physical entities are introduced beyond the standard mimetic scalar field.

free parameters (1)

coefficients of higher derivative stabilizing terms
Introduced to cure mimetic instabilities but their specific values or fitting procedure are not detailed in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The Paneitz operator acting on a scalar field in 4D is equivalent to extended mimetic gravity
This is the primary result asserted in the abstract.
ad hoc to paper Mimetic gravity instabilities can be cured by higher derivative terms without invalidating the GW propagation analysis
Explicit assumption required to derive the constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5386 in / 1537 out tokens · 44931 ms · 2026-05-07T09:01:15.348038+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

For simplicity, we study first the tensor fluctuations and later turn to scalar ones

Gravitational waves Since the background equations of motion are basi- cally the standard Friedmann equations with an addi- tional dust fluid, we look at the behavior of cosmological perturbations. For simplicity, we study first the tensor fluctuations and later turn to scalar ones. To study ten- sor fluctuations we perturb the flat FLRW metric as ds2 =a(...
[2]

Working in the uniform-ϕslicing, also called the unitary gauge, we perturb the FLRW metric as ds2 =−e 2Φdt2 +a 2e2ζδij(∂iβ+ dx i)(∂jβ+ dx i)

Scalar sector For completeness, we also study the scalar fluctuations. Working in the uniform-ϕslicing, also called the unitary gauge, we perturb the FLRW metric as ds2 =−e 2Φdt2 +a 2e2ζδij(∂iβ+ dx i)(∂jβ+ dx i). (3.19) Inserting this ansatz into the action (3.9), Taylor expand- ing, solving the constraints, and after some calculations, we find that the s...
[3]

Wetterich, Quantum scale symmetry, (2019), arXiv:1901.04741 [hep-th]

C. Wetterich, Quantum scale symmetry, (2019), arXiv:1901.04741 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[4]

Wetterich, Fundamental scale invariance, Nucl

C. Wetterich, Fundamental scale invariance, Nucl. Phys. B964, 115326 (2021), arXiv:2007.08805 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[5]

Wetterich, Fine Tuning Problem and the Renormal- ization Group, Phys

C. Wetterich, Fine Tuning Problem and the Renormal- ization Group, Phys. Lett. B140, 215 (1984)

1984
[6]

Hempfling, The Next-to-minimal Coleman-Weinberg model, Phys

R. Hempfling, The Next-to-minimal Coleman-Weinberg model, Phys. Lett. B379, 153 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9604278

work page arXiv 1996
[7]

K. A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal Symmetry and the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B648, 312 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612165

work page arXiv 2007
[8]

R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, and R. R. Volkas, Electroweak Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale in- variance, Phys. Lett. B655, 156 (2007), arXiv:0704.1165 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2007
[9]

Aoki and S

H. Aoki and S. Iso, Revisiting the Naturalness Problem – Who is afraid of quadratic divergences? –, Phys. Rev. D86, 013001 (2012), arXiv:1201.0857 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[10]

Wetterich and M

C. Wetterich and M. Yamada, Gauge hierarchy problem in asymptotically safe gravity–the resurgence mechanism, Phys. Lett. B770, 268 (2017), arXiv:1612.03069 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[11]

Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry

C. Wetterich, Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Sym- metry, Nucl. Phys. B302, 668 (1988), arXiv:1711.03844 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 1988
[12]

Rabinovici, B

E. Rabinovici, B. Saering, and W. A. Bardeen, Critical Surfaces and Flat Directions in a Finite Theory, Phys. Rev. D36, 562 (1987)

1987
[13]

Rubio and C

J. Rubio and C. Wetterich, Emergent scale symmetry: Connecting inflation and dark energy, Phys. Rev. D96, 063509 (2017), arXiv:1705.00552 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[14]

Higgs inflation

J. Rubio, Higgs inflation, Front. Astron. Space Sci.5, 50 (2019), arXiv:1807.02376 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[15]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2018
[16]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. X. Con- straints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2018
[17]

Scale invariance vs conformal invariance

Y. Nakayama, Scale invariance vs conformal invariance, Phys. Rept.569, 1 (2015), arXiv:1302.0884 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[18]

P. D. Mannheim, Making the Case for Conformal Grav- ity, Found. Phys.42, 388 (2012), arXiv:1101.2186 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2012
[19]

Lucat and T

S. Lucat and T. Prokopec, The role of conformal sym- metry in gravity and the standard model, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 245002 (2016), arXiv:1606.02677 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[20]

Rachwa l, Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity, Universe4, 125 (2018), arXiv:1808.10457 [hep-th]

L. Rachwa l, Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity, Universe4, 125 (2018), arXiv:1808.10457 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[21]

Witten, Ads/cft correspondence and topological field theory, Journal of High Energy Physics1998, 012–012 (1998)

E. Witten, Ads/cft correspondence and topological field theory, Journal of High Energy Physics1998, 012–012 (1998)

1998
[22]

Maldacena, The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, International Journal of The- oretical Physics38, 1113–1133 (1999)

J. Maldacena, The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, International Journal of The- oretical Physics38, 1113–1133 (1999)

1999
[23]

A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, Ads field theory from conformal field theory, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 10.1007/jhep02(2013)054 (2013)

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)054 2013
[24]

A. H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Mimetic Dark Matter, JHEP11, 135, arXiv:1308.5410 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv
[25]

Golovnev, On the recently proposed Mimetic Dark Matter, Phys

A. Golovnev, On the recently proposed Mimetic Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B728, 39 (2014), arXiv:1310.2790 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[26]

A. O. Barvinsky, Dark matter as a ghost free con- formal extension of Einstein theory, JCAP01, 014, arXiv:1311.3111 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[27]

Deruelle and J

N. Deruelle and J. Rua, Disformal Transformations, Veiled General Relativity and Mimetic Gravity, JCAP 09, 002, arXiv:1407.0825 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[28]

Arroja, N

F. Arroja, N. Bartolo, P. Karmakar, and S. Matarrese, The two faces of mimetic Horndeski gravity: disformal transformations and Lagrange multiplier, JCAP09, 051, arXiv:1506.08575 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[29]

Jirouˇ sek, K

P. Jirouˇ sek, K. Shimada, A. Vikman, and M. Yam- aguchi, Disforming to conformal symmetry, JCAP11, 019, arXiv:2207.12611 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[30]

Golovnev, The variational principle, conformal and disformal transformations, and the degrees of freedom, J

A. Golovnev, The variational principle, conformal and disformal transformations, and the degrees of freedom, J. Math. Phys.64, 012501 (2023), arXiv:2208.04082 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[31]

Jirouˇ sek, K

P. Jirouˇ sek, K. Shimada, A. Vikman, and M. Yamaguchi, New dynamical degrees of freedom from invertible trans- formations, JHEP07, 154, arXiv:2208.05951 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[32]

Hammer and A

K. Hammer and A. Vikman, Many Faces of Mimetic Gravity, (2015), arXiv:1512.09118 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[33]

Babichev, K

E. Babichev, K. Izumi, K. Noui, N. Tanahashi, and M. Yamaguchi, Generalization of conformal-disformal transformations of the metric in scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D110, 064063 (2024), arXiv:2405.13126 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Dom` enech and A

G. Dom` enech and A. Ganz, Disformal symmetry in the Universe: mimetic gravity and beyond, JCAP08, 046, arXiv:2304.11035 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[35]

Dom` enech and A

G. Dom` enech and A. Ganz, Connecting relativistic MOND theories with mimetic gravity, JCAP06, 059, arXiv:2503.11174 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[36]

Sebastiani, S

L. Sebastiani, S. Vagnozzi, and R. Myrzakulov, Mimetic gravity: a review of recent developments and applications to cosmology and astrophysics, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 3156915 (2017), arXiv:1612.08661 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

Malaeb, The Theoretical Landscape of Mimetic Grav- ity: A Comprehensive Review, (2026), arXiv:2602.14082 [gr-qc]

O. Malaeb, The Theoretical Landscape of Mimetic Grav- ity: A Comprehensive Review, (2026), arXiv:2602.14082 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

Boyle and N

L. Boyle and N. Turok, Cancelling the vacuum en- ergy and Weyl anomaly in the standard model with dimension-zero scalar fields, (2021), arXiv:2110.06258 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[39]

Turok and L

N. Turok and L. Boyle, A Minimal Explanation of the Primordial Cosmological Perturbations, (2023), arXiv:2302.00344 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

J. M. Cline and A. Hell, Pathologies of dimension-zero scalar fields, (2026), arXiv:2603.05683 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[41]

Takahashi and T

K. Takahashi and T. Kobayashi, Extended mimetic grav- ity: Hamiltonian analysis and gradient instabilities, JCAP11, 038, arXiv:1708.02951 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[42]

A. H. Chamseddine, V. Mukhanov, and A. Vikman, Cosmology with Mimetic Matter, JCAP06, 017, arXiv:1403.3961 [astro-ph.CO]. 7

work page arXiv
[43]

Chaichian, J

M. Chaichian, J. Kluson, M. Oksanen, and A. Ture- anu, Mimetic dark matter, ghost instability and a mimetic tensor-vector-scalar gravity, JHEP12, 102, arXiv:1404.4008 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[44]

Mirzagholi and A

L. Mirzagholi and A. Vikman, Imperfect Dark Matter, JCAP06, 028, arXiv:1412.7136 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[45]

Langlois, M

D. Langlois, M. Mancarella, K. Noui, and F. Vernizzi, Mimetic gravity as DHOST theories, JCAP02, 036, arXiv:1802.03394 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[46]

Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability

D. Langlois and K. Noui, Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski in- stability, JCAP02, 034, arXiv:1510.06930 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv
[47]

Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski and disformal transformations

J. Ben Achour, D. Langlois, and K. Noui, Degener- ate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski and disformal transformations, Phys. Rev. D93, 124005 (2016), arXiv:1602.08398 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[48]

Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski up to cubic order

J. Ben Achour, M. Crisostomi, K. Koyama, D. Lan- glois, K. Noui, and G. Tasinato, Degenerate higher or- der scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski up to cubic order, JHEP12, 100, arXiv:1608.08135 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv
[49]

Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity

M. Crisostomi, K. Koyama, and G. Tasinato, Ex- tended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity, JCAP04, 044, arXiv:1602.03119 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv
[50]

Ostrogradsky in Theories with Multiple Fields

C. de Rham and A. Matas, Ostrogradsky in Theories with Multiple Fields, JCAP06, 041, arXiv:1604.08638 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv
[51]

A. Ganz, P. Karmakar, S. Matarrese, and D. Sorokin, Hamiltonian analysis of mimetic scalar gravity revisited, Phys. Rev. D99, 064009 (2019), arXiv:1812.02667 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[52]

A. Ganz, N. Bartolo, and S. Matarrese, Towards a viable effective field theory of mimetic gravity, JCAP12, 037, arXiv:1907.10301 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 1907
[53]

Firouzjahi, M

H. Firouzjahi, M. A. Gorji, and S. A. Hosseini Mansoori, Instabilities in Mimetic Matter Perturbations, JCAP07, 031, arXiv:1703.02923 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[54]

Hirano, S

S. Hirano, S. Nishi, and T. Kobayashi, Healthy imperfect dark matter from effective theory of mimetic cosmological perturbations, JCAP07, 009, arXiv:1704.06031 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[55]

Zheng, L

Y. Zheng, L. Shen, Y. Mou, and M. Li, On (in)stabilities of perturbations in mimetic models with higher deriva- tives, JCAP08, 040, arXiv:1704.06834 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[56]

M. A. Gorji, S. A. Hosseini Mansoori, and H. Firouz- jahi, Higher Derivative Mimetic Gravity, JCAP01, 020, arXiv:1709.09988 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv
[57]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi- GBM, INTEGRAL), Gravitational Waves and Gamma- rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[58]

S. M. Paneitz, A Quartic Conformally Covariant Dif- ferential Operator for Arbitrary Pseudo-Riemannian Manifolds (Summary) 10.3842/sigma.2008.036 (2008), arXiv:0803.4331 [math.DG]

work page doi:10.3842/sigma.2008.036 2008
[59]

M. Kaku, P. K. Townsend, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Properties of Conformal Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D17, 3179 (1978)

1978
[60]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, One Loop Beta Func- tion in Conformal Supergravities, Nucl. Phys. B203, 157 (1982)

1982
[61]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, ASYMPTOTIC FREEDOM IN EXTENDED CONFORMAL SUPER- GRAVITIES, Phys. Lett. B110, 117 (1982), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 126, (1983)]

1982
[62]

R. P. Woodard, Ostrogradsky’s theorem on Hamil- tonian instability, Scholarpedia10, 32243 (2015), arXiv:1506.02210 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[63]

Langlois, Dark energy and modified gravity in de- generate higher-order scalar–tensor (DHOST) theories: A review, Int

D. Langlois, Dark energy and modified gravity in de- generate higher-order scalar–tensor (DHOST) theories: A review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1942006 (2019), arXiv:1811.06271 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[64]

Motohashi, T

H. Motohashi, T. Suyama, and K. Takahashi, Fundamen- tal theorem on gauge fixing at the action level, Phys. Rev. D94, 124021 (2016), arXiv:1608.00071 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[65]

Myrzakulov, L

R. Myrzakulov, L. Sebastiani, S. Vagnozzi, and S. Zerbini, Static spherically symmetric solutions in mimetic gravity: rotation curves and wormholes, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 125005 (2016), arXiv:1510.02284 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[66]

M. A. Gorji, A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, and H. Firouz- jahi, Mimetic black holes, Phys. Rev. D101, 124060 (2020), arXiv:1912.04636 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[67]

Dom` enech, A

G. Dom` enech, A. Ganz, and A. Tsabodimos, On the con- sistent disformal couplings to fermions, JCAP02, 045, arXiv:2510.07419 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[68]

A. H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Mimetic dark matter, Journal of High Energy Physics2013, 10.1007/jhep11(2013)135 (2013)

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)135 2013
[69]

J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251304 (2017), arXiv:1710.05901 [astro- ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017