pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03540 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

The Cocoon from a Massive Star's Death: VLA Radio Polarization Study of Possible Historical Supernova Remnant G7.7-3.7

Tian-Xian Luo , Ping Zhou , C.-Y. Ng , Zhi-Yu Zhang , Shumeng Zhang , Hai-Chen Lin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords supernova remnantG7.7-3.7radio polarizationcocoon morphologycircumstellar shellsrotation measureprogenitor windsVLA observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Radio polarization observations indicate that the cocoon-like shape of supernova remnant G7.7-3.7 arises from interaction with shells ejected by its massive progenitor star.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports new radio polarization measurements of the candidate historical supernova remnant G7.7-3.7 obtained with the Very Large Array. These data show a cocoon-shaped structure with multiple shells and varying levels of polarization, where the magnetic fields follow the filament shapes due to compression in shocks. The authors propose that large changes in the rotation measure across the object come from magnetized winds blown by the massive star before its explosion. This leads them to conclude that the remnant's distinctive shape arises from the expanding shock wave colliding with shells of material previously ejected by the star. Polarization observations thus offer a way to probe the surroundings and the star's earlier mass loss.

Core claim

We performed L-band radio polarization observations of G7.7-3.7 using the Very Large Array. The high-resolution 1.4 GHz continuum image reveals a cocoon-like morphology with multiple shells and faint blowout structures. The total flux density is 9.6 Jy and the spectral index map shows predominantly nonthermal emission with an integrated index of -0.38. Polarization images show high linear polarization fraction (30-40%) in the northwestern filaments and moderate polarization (10-20%) in the northeast and south, with magnetic fields aligned with the filamentary structures consistent with shock compression. Large rotation measure variations across the SNR likely originate from magnetized winds,

What carries the argument

The linear polarization fraction maps and rotation measure variations from the L-band VLA observations, which trace shock-compressed magnetic fields and link the morphology to pre-existing circumstellar material.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar polarization mapping of other asymmetric remnants could reveal whether their shapes commonly trace earlier stellar mass loss rather than the explosion dynamics alone.
  • Combining these radio data with infrared observations of dust shells would provide a direct test for the presence of the proposed circumstellar material.
  • If the interpretation holds, it supplies a new observational route to estimate mass-loss rates for massive stars that ended as supernovae.

Load-bearing premise

The large rotation measure variations across the SNR originate from magnetized massive progenitor winds rather than unrelated foreground interstellar material or other local effects.

What would settle it

Independent maps of foreground Faraday rotation or interstellar polarization that show the observed RM variations match patterns outside the SNR and lack spatial correlation with its radio emission would falsify the progenitor wind origin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03540 by C.-Y. Ng, Hai-Chen Lin, Ping Zhou, Shumeng Zhang, Tian-Xian Luo, Zhi-Yu Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The wideband continuum intensity map of SNR G7.7−3.7 from B- and C-configurations of VLA at the reference frequency of 1.4 GHz with a bandwidth of 960 MHz. The gray ellipse in the left bottom corner denotes the synthesized beam (7.6 ′′ × 6.2 ′′ FWHM, PA=17◦ ). VLA and the 30 m antenna of the Instituto Argentino de Radioastronom´ıa (IAR). The largest angular scale (LAS) detectable in our observation is 16′ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The flux intensity spectrum of G7.7−3.7. The black dots denote the flux density measured in 88, 118, 154, 200, and 300 MHz using GLEAM data and 1.4 GHz using our VLA observation, with 1-σ error bars. The red line is the best-fit line with 1-σ gray shadow. To obtain a spatially resolved spectral index map with adequate angular resolution, we used only the 200 MHz, 300 MHz, and 1.4 GHz images. These images w… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The spectral index map of G7.7−3.7 from 200 MHz to 1.4 GHz overlaid with gray contours of 1.4 GHz total intensity levels at 0.2 mJy/beam, 0.4 mJy/beam, and 0.6 mJy/beam. Pixels in which the flux density is less than 6σ are masked. The gray ellipse in the left bottom corner denote the smoothed beam (155′′ × 155′′ FWHM). 3.3. Polarization Properties The linearly polarized intensity and the linear polar￾izati… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: The linear polarized intensity of G7.7−3.7. Right: The linear polarization fraction of G7.7−3.7. Pixels in which the linear polarization intensity are less than 2σ or the subband Stokes I images are less than 6σ are masked. The brown contours are total intensity levels at 0.2 mJy/beam, 0.4 mJy/beam, and 0.6 mJy/beam. The gray ellipse in the left bottom corner denote the synthesized beam (38′′ FWHM). … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: The RM map of G7.7−3.7 overlaid with gray contours of total intensity levels at 0.2 mJy/beam, 0.4 mJy/beam, and 0.6 mJy/beam. Pixels in which the linear polarization intensity are less than 3σ and the error of RM are more than 10 rad m−2 are masked. The gray ellipse in the left bottom corner denote the synthesized beam (38′′ FWHM). Right: Sky-projected magnetic field vectors overlaid on the L-band co… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the composite image of G7.7−3.7 in VLA 1.4 GHz (red) and X-ray (cyan). Unlike radio im￾age, the X-ray image of G7.7−3.7 only reveals a bright arc in the south and some very dim emission in the east. Along the south arc, the X-ray emission is bright where the radio emission is relatively faint. Previous X-ray analysis indicated that the ambient density of G7.7−3.7 is likely non-uniform (P. Zhou et al.… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The RM histogram of G7.7−3.7. The red dashed lines represent the RM value of four significant peaks. The variation of the RM values compared to the mean value is generally a few tens of rad m−2 , broadly agrees with the red supergiant stellar wind model of ∼ 30 rad m−2 . However, it should be noted that this model involves many simplifications and assumptions re￾garding stellar properties and wind paramete… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: MeerKAT image of G7.7−3.7 at 1335 MHz (W. D. Cotton et al. 2024). The green solid lines connects the two opposite blowouts. clumped ejecta shrapnel (B. Aschenbach et al. 1995; C.- Y. Wang & R. A. Chevalier 2002; M. Miceli et al. 2008; S. Orlando et al. 2016). In addition, jets launched by the progenitor system or during the SN explosion can also form two opposite blowouts (R. A. Fesen et al. 2006). In the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

G7.7$-$3.7 is a possible historical SNR, with the origin of its cocoon-like morphology and its supernova type remaining unclear. We performed L-band radio polarization observations of G7.7$-$3.7 using the Very Large Array in C and B-configurations. The high-resolution 1.4 GHz continuum image reveals a cocoon-like morphology with multiple shells and faint blowout structures. The total flux density is 9.6$\pm$0.5 Jy and the spectral index map shows predominantly nonthermal emission, with an integrated spectral index of $-$0.38$\pm$0.04. Polarization images of G7.7$-$3.7 show high linear polarization fraction (30%-40%) in the northwestern filaments and moderate polarization (10%-20%) in the northeast and south. The magnetic fields aligned with the filamentary structures, consistent with shock compression. Large rotation measure (RM) variations across the SNR likely originate from magnetized massive progenitor winds. We suggest that the cocoon-like morphology results from the interaction between the SNR and pre-existing circumstellar shells, demonstrating that the radio polarization provides useful constraints on the environments and even the progenitor mass-loss.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports VLA L-band continuum and polarization observations of the candidate historical SNR G7.7−3.7. The 1.4 GHz images reveal a cocoon-like morphology with multiple shells and faint blowout structures. The integrated flux density is 9.6 ± 0.5 Jy with a spectral index of −0.38 ± 0.04, indicating predominantly nonthermal emission. Polarization fractions reach 30–40% in northwestern filaments and 10–20% elsewhere, with magnetic fields aligned along filaments consistent with shock compression. Large RM variations across the source are interpreted as originating from magnetized massive progenitor winds, leading to the conclusion that the morphology arises from SNR interaction with pre-existing circumstellar shells and that polarization data can constrain progenitor mass-loss.

Significance. The high-resolution polarization maps and spectral index results provide solid observational constraints on the magnetic field geometry and emission mechanism in this SNR, which are valuable additions to the catalog of well-studied remnants. If the RM variations can be shown to arise from progenitor winds rather than unrelated foreground material, the work would offer useful constraints on circumstellar environments around massive stars and their role in shaping SNR morphologies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Discussion] Abstract and Discussion section: The claim that 'Large rotation measure (RM) variations across the SNR likely originate from magnetized massive progenitor winds' is presented as the basis for the cocoon morphology interpretation and progenitor mass-loss constraints, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of observed RM amplitudes to expected values from a wind model (using mass-loss rate, density profile, or magnetic field strength) and no description of Galactic foreground subtraction using nearby extragalactic sources or pulsars. This assumption is load-bearing for the central interpretive claim.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion section: Alternative explanations for the RM variations (e.g., unrelated foreground ISM fluctuations or local effects within the SNR) are not quantitatively assessed or ruled out, leaving the attribution to progenitor winds as an untested assumption that directly supports the suggestion of interaction with pre-existing circumstellar shells.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Results] The uncertainty on the integrated flux density (9.6 ± 0.5 Jy) is stated without specifying whether it includes only statistical errors or also systematic calibration uncertainties from the VLA data reduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed report. The comments highlight important points regarding the strength of the RM interpretation, and we have revised the manuscript to address them directly. Our responses to the major comments are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Discussion] Abstract and Discussion section: The claim that 'Large rotation measure (RM) variations across the SNR likely originate from magnetized massive progenitor winds' is presented as the basis for the cocoon morphology interpretation and progenitor mass-loss constraints, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of observed RM amplitudes to expected values from a wind model (using mass-loss rate, density profile, or magnetic field strength) and no description of Galactic foreground subtraction using nearby extragalactic sources or pulsars. This assumption is load-bearing for the central interpretive claim.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not include an explicit quantitative comparison or a detailed description of foreground handling, which weakens the presentation of this interpretive step. In the revised version we have added to the Discussion a order-of-magnitude estimate that adopts standard Wolf-Rayet wind parameters (Ṁ ≈ 10^{-5} M_⊙ yr^{-1}, v_∞ ≈ 1000 km s^{-1}, and a compressed B-field of a few μG at the shell radius) and shows that the observed RM amplitudes are consistent with the expected contribution from a magnetized circumstellar wind. We have also inserted a short Methods paragraph describing the foreground correction, which was performed by subtracting the mean RM measured from several compact extragalactic sources in the same field; we note the sparse sampling and the resulting uncertainty. These additions make the assumptions explicit while preserving the original morphological argument. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion section: Alternative explanations for the RM variations (e.g., unrelated foreground ISM fluctuations or local effects within the SNR) are not quantitatively assessed or ruled out, leaving the attribution to progenitor winds as an untested assumption that directly supports the suggestion of interaction with pre-existing circumstellar shells.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original text did not quantitatively compare the observed RM pattern against plausible alternatives. The revised Discussion now includes two short paragraphs that address this. First, we compare the amplitude and spatial scale of the RM fluctuations to published Galactic RM maps and to the RM dispersion measured from nearby pulsars; the variations inside G7.7−3.7 exceed the local foreground level by a factor of several and are spatially aligned with the radio filaments, which is difficult to reconcile with an unrelated screen. Second, we estimate the internal Faraday depth that would be required for SNR-internal rotation and show that it would demand electron densities inconsistent with the observed synchrotron surface brightness and the lack of strong depolarization. While these arguments remain qualitative, they provide a clearer basis for preferring the progenitor-wind interpretation over the alternatives. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational measurements and standard interpretation

full rationale

The paper reports VLA L-band polarization observations of G7.7-3.7, presenting measured quantities (total flux 9.6 Jy, spectral index -0.38, polarization fractions 10-40%, RM variations) and a qualitative interpretation that the cocoon morphology arises from SNR interaction with circumstellar shells and that RM variations likely trace progenitor winds. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations appear in the provided text; the central claims are interpretive statements following from the data without any reduction to self-defined inputs, self-citations, or renamed known results. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks as standard radio astronomy data reduction and morphological inference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation rests on two standard domain assumptions in radio SNR studies; no free parameters are fitted to produce the morphology claim and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons in compressed magnetic fields produces the observed nonthermal spectral index and linear polarization in supernova remnants.
    Invoked to interpret the spectral index map and polarization fractions as shock-compressed fields.
  • domain assumption Large rotation measure variations across an SNR can be produced by magnetized winds from a massive progenitor star.
    Used to attribute the observed RM structure to pre-supernova mass loss.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1395 out tokens · 52719 ms · 2026-05-07T14:28:46.716334+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2019, A&A, 622, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833865

    Arias, M., Vink, J., Iacobelli, M., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833865

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833865 2019

  2. [2]

    1995, Nature, 373, 587, doi: 10.1038/373587a0 14 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Aschenbach, B., Egger, R., & Tr¨ umper, J. 1995, Nature, 373, 587, doi: 10.1038/373587a0 14 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Pric...

    work page doi:10.1038/373587a0 1995

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Baumgardt, H., & Vasiliev, E. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1474

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1474 2021

  4. [4]

    2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 414, doi: 10.1002/asna.200510366

    Beck, R., & Krause, M. 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 414, doi: 10.1002/asna.200510366

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.200510366 2005

  5. [5]

    Bell, A. R. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 550, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08097.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08097.x 2004

  6. [6]

    S., et al

    Berry, D., Graves, S., Bell, G. S., et al. 2022, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 532, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXX, ed. J. E. Ruiz, F. Pierfedereci, & P. Teuben, 559

    2022

  7. [7]

    M., Lundqvist, P., & Chevalier, R

    Blondin, J. M., Lundqvist, P., & Chevalier, R. A. 1996, ApJ, 472, 257, doi: 10.1086/178060

    work page doi:10.1086/178060 1996

  8. [8]

    A., & de Bruyn, A

    Brentjens, M. A., & de Bruyn, A. G. 2005, A&A, 441, 1217, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052990

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 2005

  9. [9]

    Burbidge, G. R. 1959, ApJ, 129, 849, doi: 10.1086/146680

    work page doi:10.1086/146680 1959

  10. [10]

    Caprioli \ and\ author A

    Caprioli, D., & Spitkovsky, A. 2014, ApJ, 783, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/91 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/91 2014

  11. [11]

    M., & Kassim, N

    Castelletti, G., Supan, L., Peters, W. M., & Kassim, N. E. 2021, A&A, 653, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141635

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141635 2021

  12. [12]

    A., & Luo, D

    Chevalier, R. A., & Luo, D. 1994, ApJ, 421, 225, doi: 10.1086/173640

    work page doi:10.1086/173640 1994

  13. [13]

    Chiotellis, A., Boumis, P., & Spetsieri, Z. T. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 176, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3573

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3573 2021

  14. [14]

    2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy, 2.0.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3377984 de Vaucouleurs, G

    Comrie, A., Wang, K.-S., Hsu, S.-C., et al. 2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3377984

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3377984 2021

  15. [15]

    D., Kothes, R., Camilo, F., et al

    Cotton, W. D., Kothes, R., Camilo, F., et al. 2024, ApJS, 270, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad0ecb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad0ecb 2024

  16. [16]

    J., Berry, D

    Currie, M. J., Berry, D. S., Jenness, T., et al. 2014, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 485, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII, ed. N. Manset & P. Forshay, 391

    2014

  17. [17]

    A study of multifrequency polarization pulse profiles of millisecond pulsars

    Dai, S., Hobbs, G., Manchester, R. N., et al. 2015, mnras, 449, 3223, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv508

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv508 2015

  18. [18]

    Decin, L., Cox, N. L. J., Royer, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219792

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219792 2012

  19. [19]

    R., & Milne, D

    Dickel, J. R., & Milne, D. K. 1976, Australian Journal of Physics, 29, 435, doi: 10.1071/PH760435 Domˇ cek, V., Hern´ andez Santisteban, J. V., Chiotellis, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 1112, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2779

    work page doi:10.1071/ph760435 1976

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Dubner, G., & Giacani, E. 2015, A&A Rv, 23, 3, doi: 10.1007/s00159-015-0083-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-015-0083-5 2015

  21. [21]

    M., Giacani, E

    Dubner, G. M., Giacani, E. B., Goss, W. M., Moffett, D. A., & Holdaway, M. 1996, AJ, 111, 1304, doi: 10.1086/117875

    work page doi:10.1086/117875 1996

  22. [22]

    W., Cook, J

    Duchesne, S. W., Cook, J. H., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2025, PASA, 42, e158, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2025.10115

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10115 2025

  23. [23]

    Dwarkadas, V. V. 2007, ApJ, 667, 226, doi: 10.1086/520670

    work page doi:10.1086/520670 2007

  24. [24]

    Dwarkadas, V. V. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1639, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18001.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18001.x 2011

  25. [25]

    C., Slane, P., & Gaensler, B

    Ellison, D. C., Slane, P., & Gaensler, B. M. 2001, ApJ, 563, 191, doi: 10.1086/323687

    work page doi:10.1086/323687 2001

  26. [26]

    A., Hammell, M

    Fesen, R. A., Hammell, M. C., Morse, J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 283, doi: 10.1086/504254

    work page doi:10.1086/504254 2006

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    George, S. J., Stil, J. M., & Keller, B. W. 2012, PASA, 29, 214, doi: 10.1071/AS11027

    work page doi:10.1071/as11027 2012

  28. [28]

    doi:10.1086/510740 , number =

    Ghavamian, P., Laming, J. M., & Rakowski, C. E. 2007, ApJL, 654, L69, doi: 10.1086/510740

    work page doi:10.1086/510740 2007

  29. [29]

    Green, D. A. 2025, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 46, 14, doi: 10.1007/s12036-024-10038-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-024-10038-4 2025

  30. [30]

    A., & Lyne, A

    Hamilton, P. A., & Lyne, A. G. 1987, MNRAS, 224, 1073

    1987

  31. [31]

    2012, MNRAS, 423, 600, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

    Hancock, P. J., Murphy, T., Gaensler, B. M., Hopkins, A., & Curran, J. R. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1812, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20768.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20768.x 2012

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Hancock, P. J., Trott, C. M., & Hurley-Walker, N. 2018, PASA, 35, e011, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2018.3

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2018.3 2018

  33. [33]

    M., Kothes, R., et al

    Harvey-Smith, L., Gaensler, B. M., Kothes, R., et al. 2010, ApJ, 712, 1157, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1157

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/1157 2010

  34. [34]

    2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Heald, G. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 259, Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies, ed. K. G. Strassmeier, A. G. Kosovichev, & J. E. Beckman, 591–602, doi: 10.1017/S1743921309031421

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921309031421 2009

  35. [35]

    R., Hancock, P

    Hurley-Walker, N., Callingham, J. R., Hancock, P. J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2337

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2337 2017

  36. [36]

    J., Franzen, T

    Hurley-Walker, N., Hancock, P. J., Franzen, T. M. O., et al. 2019, PASA, 36, e047, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2019.37

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.37 2019

  37. [37]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 3289, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1086

    Ideguchi, S., Inoue, T., Akahori, T., & Takahashi, K. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3289, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1086

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1086 2022

  38. [38]

    The Thousand-Pulsar-Array programme on MeerKAT – I. Science objectives and first results

    Johnston, S., Karastergiou, A., Keith, M. J., et al. 2020, mnras, 493, 3608, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa516

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa516 2020

  39. [39]

    A., & Mandel, E

    Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, ed. H. E

    2003

  40. [40]

    Jun, B.-I., & Jones, T. W. 1999, ApJ, 511, 774, doi: 10.1086/306694 15

    work page doi:10.1086/306694 1999

  41. [41]

    In which shell-type SNRs should we look for gamma-rays and neutrinos from P–P collisions?

    Katz, B., & Waxman, E. 2008, JCAP, 2008, 018, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/01/018

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/01/018 2008

  42. [42]

    Klein, U., & Emerson, D. T. 1981, A&A, 94, 29

    1981

  43. [43]

    Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., & Cassinelli, J. P. 1999, Introduction to Stellar Winds (Cambridge University Press)

    1999

  44. [44]

    M., Hankins, M

    Lau, R. M., Hankins, M. J., Han, Y., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1308, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01812-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01812-x 2022

  45. [45]

    J., Filipovi´ c, M

    Luken, K. J., Filipovi´ c, M. D., Maxted, N. I., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 2606, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3439

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3439 2020

  46. [46]

    2022, SoPh, 297, 150, doi: 10.1007/s11207-022-02085-3

    Yushkov, E. 2022, SoPh, 297, 150, doi: 10.1007/s11207-022-02085-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-022-02085-3 2022

  47. [47]

    The ATNF Pulsar Catalogue

    Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993, doi: 10.1086/428488

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/428488 2005

  48. [48]

    N., & Taylor, J

    Manchester, R. N., & Taylor, J. H. 1977, Pulsars (San Francisco : W. H. Freeman)

    1977

  49. [49]

    The microphysics of collisionless shock waves

    Marcowith, A., Bret, A., Bykov, A., et al. 2016, Reports on Progress in Physics, 79, 046901, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046901 2016

  50. [50]

    F., Ostriker J

    McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. 1977, ApJ, 218, 148, doi: 10.1086/155667

    work page doi:10.1086/155667 1977

  51. [51]

    2008, ApJ, 676, 1064, doi: 10.1086/528737

    Miceli, M., Bocchino, F., & Reale, F. 2008, ApJ, 676, 1064, doi: 10.1086/528737

    work page doi:10.1086/528737 2008

  52. [52]

    K., & Dickel, J

    Milne, D. K., & Dickel, J. R. 1974, Australian Journal of Physics, 27, 549, doi: 10.1071/PH740549

    work page doi:10.1071/ph740549 1974

  53. [53]

    K., Roger, R

    Milne, D. K., Roger, R. S., Kesteven, M. J., et al. 1986, MNRAS, 223, 487, doi: 10.1093/mnras/223.3.487

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/223.3.487 1986

  54. [54]

    C., Rossi, E

    Noutsos, A., Johnston, S., Kramer, M., & Karastergiou, A. 2008, mnras, 386, 1881, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13188.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13188.x 2008

  55. [55]

    L., & Bocchino, F

    Orlando, S., Miceli, M., Pumo, M. L., & Bocchino, F. 2016, ApJ, 822, 22, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/22

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/22 2016

  56. [56]

    2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed

    Patnaude, D., & Badenes, C. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Murdin (Springer, Cham), 2233, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5 98

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5 2017

  57. [57]

    J., Lee, S.-H., Slane, P

    Patnaude, D. J., Lee, S.-H., Slane, P. O., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9189 Pavlovi´ c, M. Z., Uroˇ sevi´ c, D., Vukoti´ c, B., Arbutina, B., & G¨ oker,¨U. D. 2013, ApJS, 204, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/204/1/4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9189 2017

  58. [58]

    ApJS , author =

    Perley, R. A., & Butler, B. J. 2017, ApJS, 230, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9 2017

  59. [59]

    Gaensler, B. M. 2020, RM-Tools: Rotation measure (RM) synthesis and Stokes QU-fitting, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2005.003

    2020

  60. [60]

    T., Rho, J., & Jarrett, T

    Reach, W. T., Rho, J., & Jarrett, T. H. 2005, ApJ, 618, 297, doi: 10.1086/425855

    work page doi:10.1086/425855 2005

  61. [61]

    ON THE RADIO POLARIZATION SIGNATURE OF EFFICIENT AND INEFFICIENT PARTICLE ACCELERATION IN SUPERNOVA REMNANT SN 1006

    Reynoso, E. M., Hughes, J. P., & Moffett, D. A. 2013, AJ, 145, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/104

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/104 2013

  62. [62]

    A., Jim´ enez-Hern´ andez, P., et al

    Rubio, G., Toal´ a, J. A., Jim´ enez-Hern´ andez, P., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2837

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2837 2020

  63. [63]

    1985, A&A, 152, 121

    Sakurai, T. 1985, A&A, 152, 121

    1985

  64. [64]

    2021, , 366, 58, 10.1007/s10509-021-03960-4

    Sano, H., & Fukui, Y. 2021, Ap&SS, 366, 58, doi: 10.1007/s10509-021-03960-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-021-03960-4 2021

  65. [65]

    2015, ApJ, 799, 175, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/175

    Sano, H., Fukuda, T., Yoshiike, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 175, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/175

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/175 2015

  66. [66]

    2025, ApJL, 992, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae092d

    Shao, Y.-X., Zhou, P., Zhang, X., et al. 2025, ApJL, 992, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae092d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae092d 2025

  67. [67]

    2024, Galaxies, 12, 59, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12050059

    Slane, P., Ferrazzoli, R., Zhou, P., & Vink, J. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 59, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12050059

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies12050059 2024

  68. [68]

    G., O’Sullivan, S

    Sobey, C., Bassa, C. G., O’Sullivan, S. P., et al. 2022, aap, 661, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142636

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142636 2022

  69. [69]

    2024, Ap&SS, 369, 83, doi: 10.1007/s10509-024-04346-y

    Sofue, Y. 2024, Ap&SS, 369, 83, doi: 10.1007/s10509-024-04346-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04346-y 2024

  70. [70]

    R., & Green, D

    Stephenson, F. R., & Green, D. A. 2002, International Series in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5 Uroˇ sevi´ c, D., Pavlovi´ c, M. Z., & Arbutina, B. 2018, ApJ, 855, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaac2d van Loon, J. T. 2010, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 425, Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution, ed. C. Leitherer, P. D

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaac2d 2002

  71. [71]

    Bennett, P. W. Morris, & J. T. Van Loon, 279, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0906.4855 van Marle, A. J., & Keppens, R. 2012, A&A, 547, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218957

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.0906.4855 2012

  72. [72]

    2020, Physics and Evolution of Supernova Remnants, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-55231-2

    Vink, J. 2020, Physics and Evolution of Supernova Remnants, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-55231-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55231-2 2020

  73. [73]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  74. [74]

    Wang, C.-Y., & Chevalier, R. A. 2002, ApJ, 574, 155, doi: 10.1086/340795

    work page doi:10.1086/340795 2002

  75. [75]

    Wardle, J. F. C., & Kronberg, P. P. 1974, ApJ, 194, 249, doi: 10.1086/153240

    work page doi:10.1086/153240 1974

  76. [76]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 2010

  77. [77]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N., & Wang, N. 2017, apj, 835, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29 2017

  78. [78]

    2025, ApJ, 989, 221, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf333

    Zhang, S., Ng, C.-Y., & Bucciantini, N. 2025, ApJ, 989, 221, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf333

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf333 2025

  79. [79]

    2018, ApJL, 865, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aae07d

    Zhou, P., Vink, J., Li, G., & Domˇ cek, V. 2018, ApJL, 865, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aae07d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aae07d 2018