pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04685 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Compact, AGN-hosting Dwarf Galaxies with "Little Red Dots"-like SEDs in the Local Universe

Lulu Bao , Chao-Wei Tsai , Jingwen Wu , Jialai Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords AGN-hosting dwarf galaxiesLittle Red DotsV-shaped SEDsK-means clusteringblack hole-galaxy co-evolutionJWSTcompact galaxiesionization states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Local AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies with V-shaped SEDs are more evolved than high-redshift Little Red Dots, showing larger sizes and different ionization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Researchers look for local examples of the compact red galaxies with V-shaped spectra discovered by JWST at high redshift to understand how the first supermassive black holes formed. The study gathers nearby AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies at similar luminosities and uses clustering on their spectral shapes and sizes to sort them into groups. Roughly half match the V-shaped spectra and compact appearance of distant Little Red Dots, but these local objects turn out to be larger and to show different ionization properties. The differences indicate that the local galaxies have progressed further along their evolutionary path, so they likely trace a separate route from the high-redshift population.

Core claim

K-means clustering on SED shapes and morphological sizes divides local AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies into four groups that follow sequences in metallicity, star formation rate, and dust emission, driven mainly by UV-optical slopes. About half the sample displays V-shaped SEDs and relatively compact morphologies. Direct comparison, however, shows these local V-shaped compact ADGs possess systematically larger effective radii and distinct ionization states than high-z LRDs. The results indicate that local compact ADGs follow a different formation pathway from LRDs, underscoring the complexity of black hole-galaxy co-evolution across cosmic time.

What carries the argument

K-means clustering on SED shapes and morphological sizes that groups local AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies into sequences for comparison against high-redshift Little Red Dots.

If this is right

  • Local V-shaped ADGs trace evolutionary sequences in metallicity, star formation, and dust content set by their UV-optical slopes.
  • Local compact ADGs are more evolved than high-z LRDs, with larger effective radii.
  • Ionization states in local compact ADGs differ from those in high-redshift LRDs.
  • Black hole-galaxy co-evolution follows distinct pathways at different cosmic epochs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-redshift LRDs may represent a short-lived evolutionary stage that has no exact surviving counterpart in the local universe.
  • Searches for closer analogs could target systems even smaller or younger than the current local sample.
  • Models of early black-hole seeding may need separate tracks to accommodate the observed mismatch between local and distant populations.

Load-bearing premise

The sample of local ADGs with comparable luminosities is representative of the broader population and K-means clustering on SED shapes and sizes cleanly separates physically distinct groups without major selection biases.

What would settle it

Discovery of local AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies at similar luminosities that match high-z LRDs in both effective radius and ionization state would undermine the claim of fundamental physical differences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04685 by Chao-Wei Tsai, Jialai Wang, Jingwen Wu, Lulu Bao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Redshift distributions of the total ADG sample and its subsamples (selected via broad Hα emission, BPT diagnostics, X-ray emission, optical variability, high-ionization emission lines, DESI spectroscopy, and other methods such as infrared or radio emission). The fraction of galaxies with z > 0.5 in each sample (or subsample) is indicated at the top of each panel. The median redshift and the 1σ scatter of e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Stacked rest-frame SEDs (panel a) and effective radius (Re) distributions (panel b) of the four ADG groups classified via the K-means clustering algorithm. In panel (a), the solid colored curves represent the floating-median SEDs for each group. Individual galaxy photometries are shown as semi-transparent scattered points, all of which are normalized to the luminosity of the LRD template from Akins et al. … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: WISE color distribution of ADGs. Scatter points in different colors represent the groups classified by K-means. The marginal plots on the right and top show the number density distributions of W1−W2 and W2−W3 colors, respec￾tively. tini & Pagel 2004). We note that this metallicity es￾timate does not account for potential AGN contami￾nation, which may introduce systematic uncertainties. Photoionization mode… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SFR distributions of the four ADG groups, derived from extinction-corrected narrow Hα emission lines. In the four left panels, the vertical dashed lines indicate the median log10(SFRHα) for each group. The right panel displays the overlaid normalized density distributions. K-S tests confirm that the “Blue” group’s SFR distribution is statistically distinct from all other groups (p < 10−5 ) view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Gas-phase metallicity distributions of the four groups derived using the N2 (filled bars) and O3N2 (hatched bars) empirical calibrators. In the left four panels, the median metallicities obtained with each method are indicated by dashed (N2) and dotted (O3N2) vertical lines. The right panel presents the overlaid normalized density distributions measured with both indicators. tion indicates that the presenc… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of the local galaxy surface density around each ADG in the four groups, estimated using the kNN method. In the left four panels, filled bars show the density traced by the fifth-nearest neighbors from spectroscopically identified DESI and SDSS galaxies with Mr > −20.5 and relative velocities within 5000 km s−1 (Σ5), while hatched bars represent the density traced by the nearest massive galaxy … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: [Nii]-based BPT diagram for the “Compact &V￾shape” galaxy sample. The dashed and solid lines separate the star-forming (H ii), composite, and AGN regions (Kauff￾mann et al. 2003; Kewley et al. 2001). Galaxies in the “Com￾pact & V-shape” group are shown as colored dots, with the color indicating the normalized SED residual. Lower values and redder colors indicate more similar with the SED tem￾plate of LRDs;… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example SEDs for the “Compact &V-shape” (panel a) and “Diffuse &V-shape” (panel b) groups. SDSS spectra are plotted in yellow, and the inset panels show DESI imaging of each galaxy. Effective radii are derived from GALFIT modeling, as described in Section 3.1 view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Black hole mass (MBH) to stellar mass (M⋆) relation for the four ADG groups (colored circles), high-z BLAGNs (yellow triangles; Maiolino et al. 2024), NL LRDs (blue triangles; Zhang et al. 2025b), and local UCDs/NSCs (green squares; Graham 2020). Various MBH–M⋆ scaling re￾lations are also shown: local AGNs (Reines & Volonteri 2015, red/blue lines), UCD/NSC relation (Graham 2020, dashed green line), and hi… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Correlation between the UV slope, optical slope, effective radius, and other properties of the ADG sample. (a) Pearson correlation coefficients (r) for various properties, including the [O iii]/Hβ line ratio, gas-phase metallicity derived from the N2 and O3N2 calibrators, and WISE colors, calculated for the entire ADG sample. An asterisk (‘*’) indicates a statistically difference (p < 0.05). (b) Same as (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Local active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in dwarf galaxies are often considered as analogs for the earliest supermassive black holes, although their connections require more comprehensive examinations. Motivated by finding the local analogs of "Little Red Dots" (LRDs), the compact, red galaxies discovered by JWST at z > 5 characterized by "V-shaped" SEDs, we compile a sample of local AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies (ADGs) with comparable luminosities to statistically evaluate this connection. By applying K-means clustering to SED shapes and morphological sizes, we classified four groups which trace a sequence in physical properties, including metallicity, star formation rate, and dust emission, mainly driven by their distinct UV-optical slopes. Within these groups, we find that about half of the ADGs exhibit "V-shaped" SEDs and relatively compact morphologies. However, a direct comparison reveals fundamental physical differences: local "V-shaped", compact ADGs appear significantly more evolved than high-z LRDs, characterized by systematically larger effective radii and distinct ionization states. Our results suggest that local compact ADGs likely follow a different formation pathway from LRDs, highlighting the complexity of black hole-galaxy co-evolution across cosmic time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper compiles a sample of local AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies (ADGs) with luminosities matched to high-z Little Red Dots (LRDs), applies K-means clustering to SED shapes and morphological sizes to identify four groups tracing a sequence in metallicity, SFR, and dust properties, finds roughly half exhibit V-shaped SEDs and compact sizes, and concludes that these local V-shaped compact ADGs are more evolved than high-z LRDs (larger effective radii, distinct ionization states), implying different formation pathways.

Significance. If the sample is representative and the clustering robust, the work would be significant for JWST-era studies of early BH growth by demonstrating that local dwarf AGN hosts are imperfect analogs to LRDs and by highlighting diversity in BH-galaxy co-evolution across redshift. The clustering approach to link SED morphology with physical properties is a useful methodological contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (Sample Compilation): The selection of local ADGs with 'comparable luminosities' is not accompanied by a quantitative description of the parent catalogs, completeness limits, or tests for biases (e.g., AGN detection thresholds favoring less-obscured systems or dwarf-galaxy stellar-mass cuts). This is load-bearing because the central claim of 'fundamental physical differences' rests on the local sample being a fair, unbiased analog to the high-z LRD population.
  2. [§3] §3 (K-means Clustering): The manuscript reports four groups but provides no details on the choice of k, feature normalization (SED slopes vs. sizes), silhouette scores, or stability tests against noise or scaling. Without these, it is unclear whether the reported sequence in physical properties is robust or sensitive to implementation choices.
  3. [§4] §4 (Direct Comparison): The statements that local V-shaped ADGs have 'systematically larger effective radii' and 'distinct ionization states' lack reported uncertainties, sample sizes for each subsample, and statistical tests (e.g., KS-test p-values). This quantitative gap prevents assessment of whether the differences are significant enough to support the 'different formation pathway' conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The fraction 'about half' of ADGs with V-shaped SEDs should be replaced by an exact number and total sample size for precision.
  2. Figure captions and text: Ensure consistent terminology between 'V-shaped' SEDs, 'compact morphologies', and the four cluster labels to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper to incorporate additional details on sample selection, clustering methodology, and quantitative comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] The selection of local ADGs with 'comparable luminosities' is not accompanied by a quantitative description of the parent catalogs, completeness limits, or tests for biases (e.g., AGN detection thresholds favoring less-obscured systems or dwarf-galaxy stellar-mass cuts). This is load-bearing because the central claim of 'fundamental physical differences' rests on the local sample being a fair, unbiased analog to the high-z LRD population.

    Authors: We agree that the original §2 provided insufficient detail on the sample construction. In the revised manuscript we have expanded this section with a quantitative description of the parent catalogs, the precise luminosity-matching criteria (including the adopted luminosity range and matching procedure), completeness estimates derived from the survey selection functions, and an explicit discussion of potential biases including AGN detection thresholds and stellar-mass cuts. We also add a comparison of the selected sample to the parent population to demonstrate that it is representative within the luminosity range relevant to the LRD comparison. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] The manuscript reports four groups but provides no details on the choice of k, feature normalization (SED slopes vs. sizes), silhouette scores, or stability tests against noise or scaling. Without these, it is unclear whether the reported sequence in physical properties is robust or sensitive to implementation choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge the lack of methodological transparency in the original §3. The revised version now specifies the choice of k=4, justified by the elbow method and silhouette scores (which we report), describes the feature normalization (standardization of SED slopes and sizes to zero mean and unit variance), and includes stability tests based on bootstrap resampling and the addition of Gaussian noise to the input features. These tests confirm that the four-group solution and the associated sequence in physical properties remain robust. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4] The statements that local V-shaped ADGs have 'systematically larger effective radii' and 'distinct ionization states' lack reported uncertainties, sample sizes for each subsample, and statistical tests (e.g., KS-test p-values). This quantitative gap prevents assessment of whether the differences are significant enough to support the 'different formation pathway' conclusion.

    Authors: We have revised §4 to supply the missing quantitative information. The updated text reports the sample sizes of the V-shaped compact ADG subsample and the high-z LRD comparison sample, presents effective radii with uncertainties, and includes the results of Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (with p-values) on both the effective-radius and ionization-state distributions. These additions allow a direct assessment of the statistical significance of the reported differences. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational sample analysis and comparison

full rationale

The paper compiles a luminosity-matched sample of local AGN-hosting dwarf galaxies, applies K-means clustering directly to observed SED shapes and morphological sizes to define groups, and reports measured differences in effective radii and ionization states versus high-z LRDs. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional relations, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation; the sequence in metallicity/SFR/dust follows from the clustering on independent observables, and the evolutionary contrast is a direct data comparison rather than a constructed identity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on standard observational assumptions in galaxy SED fitting and morphology measurements, plus the validity of the sample selection for luminosity matching.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in SED fitting models and morphological size measurements from imaging data
    Invoked implicitly when classifying groups by UV-optical slopes and effective radii.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1144 out tokens · 21189 ms · 2026-05-08T17:27:27.908938+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

  2. [2]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  3. [3]

    F., Argudo-Fern´ andez, M., et al

    Almeida, A., Anderson, S. F., Argudo-Fern´ andez, M., et al. 2023, ApJS, 267, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acda98 Amor´ ın, R. O., P´ erez-Montero, E., & V´ ılchez, J. M. 2010, ApJL, 715, L128, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L128

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acda98 2023

  4. [4]

    T., Bogd´an, ´A., Kov´acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  5. [5]

    F., Geha, M., & Greene, J

    Baldassare, V. F., Geha, M., & Greene, J. 2018, ApJ, 868, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae6cf —. 2020, ApJ, 896, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8936

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae6cf 2018

  6. [6]

    F., Reines, A

    Baldassare, V. F., Reines, A. E., Gallo, E., & Greene, J. E. 2017, ApJ, 836, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/20

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/20 2017

  7. [7]

    F., Reines, A

    Baldassare, V. F., Reines, A. E., Gallo, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 57, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/57

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/57 2016

  8. [8]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  9. [9]

    2025, ApJ, 992, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae019e

    Bao, L., Tsai, C.-W., Wu, J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae019e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae019e 2025

  10. [10]

    L., Watson, M

    Birchall, K. L., Watson, M. G., & Aird, J. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 2268, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa040

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa040 2020

  11. [11]

    J., Tr \"u mper J., Haberl F., Voges W., Nandra K., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...588A.103B 588, A103

    Boller, T., Freyberg, M. J., Tr¨ umper, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525648

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525648 2016

  12. [12]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    work page Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

  13. [13]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 527, 1962, doi: 2024MNRAS.527.1962B

    Bykov, S., Gilfanov, M., & Sunyaev, R. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 527, 1962, doi: 2024MNRAS.527.1962B

    2024

  14. [14]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  15. [15]

    2009, MNRAS, 396, 1383, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14843.x

    Cardamone, C., Schawinski, K., Sarzi, M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 1191, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15383.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15383.x 2009

  16. [16]

    M., Kartaltepe, J

    Casey, C. M., Kartaltepe, J. S., Drakos, N. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc 2023

  17. [17]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.18873, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.18873

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18873 2025

  18. [18]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/328. Originally published in: IPAC/Caltech (2013) De Almeida, A. P., Mamon, G. A., Dekel, A., & Lima Neto, G. B. 2024, A&A, 687, A131, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449939

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449939 2021

  19. [19]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  20. [20]

    Discovery of low-redshift analogues to "Little Red Dots" in DESI: A later evolutionary stage of compact LRDs?

    Ding, W., Kong, X., Guo, W.-J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.14551, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.14551

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.14551 2026

  21. [21]

    C., Yuan, W., et al

    Dong, X.-B., Ho, L. C., Yuan, W., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 167, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/167

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/755/2/167 2012

  22. [22]

    S., Abraham, R

    Dunlop, J. S., Abraham, R. G., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2021, PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic

    2021

  23. [23]

    Fan, X., Ba˜ nados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 373, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455 2023

  24. [24]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e Flammini Dotti, F., Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R., Carraro, G.,

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e 2022

  25. [25]

    The long-term evolution of Ultra Faint Dwarf Galaxies and observational implications

    Trani, A. A., & Spurzem, R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.13049, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.13049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.13049 2026

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 600, L93, doi: 10.1086/379232

    work page doi:10.1086/379232 2004

  27. [27]

    Graham, A. W. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3263, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3547

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3547 2020

  28. [28]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2007, ApJ, 670, 92, doi: 10.1086/522082

    work page doi:10.1086/522082 2007

  29. [29]

    Greene, J

    Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 257, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835 2020

  30. [30]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labb´ e, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  31. [31]

    R., Jones, H

    Groves, B. A., Heckman, T. M., & Kauffmann, G. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1559, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10812.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10812.x 2006

  32. [32]

    2018, PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1809.008

    Guo, H., Shen, Y., & Wang, S. 2018, PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1809.008

    2018

  33. [33]

    2013, , 208, 19, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 19, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 14

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013

  34. [34]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.05459, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.05459

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05459 2025

  35. [35]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.05537, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.05537

    Inayoshi, K. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.05537, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.05537

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.05537 2025

  36. [36]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 IRSA, & SSC

    Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 2020

  37. [37]

    2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.23774

    Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.23774, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.23774

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.23774 2025

  38. [38]

    E., Ho, L

    Jiang, Y.-F., Greene, J. E., Ho, L. C., Xiao, T., & Barth, A. J. 2011, ApJ, 742, 68, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/68 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03551, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.03551

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/68 2011

  39. [39]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  40. [40]

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 1998

  41. [41]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  42. [42]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.06965, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.06965

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.06965 2025

  43. [43]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 911, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abec40

    Geha, M. 2021, ApJ, 911, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abec40

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abec40 2021

  44. [44]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03576, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.03576 2024

  45. [45]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265 2024

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551 2025

  47. [47]

    J., Reines, A

    Latimer, L. J., Reines, A. E., Bogdan, A., & Kraft, R. 2021, ApJL, 922, L40, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac3af6

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac3af6 2021

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Lee, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 599, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/599

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/1/599 2009

  49. [49]

    Greene, J. E. 2015, ApJ, 805, 12, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/12

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/12 2015

  50. [50]

    C., Finkelstein, S

    Leung, G. C., Finkelstein, S. L., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12005, doi: arXiv:2411.12005

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., Chen, K., Ichikawa, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 980, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb 2025

  52. [52]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1

    Lin, R., Zheng, Z.-Y., Jiang, C., et al. 2025, ApJL, 980, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1 2025

  53. [53]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.01473

    Lin, R., Zheng, Z.-Y., Wang, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.01473, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.01473

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.01473 2026

  54. [54]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10659

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10659, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10659

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.10659 2025

  55. [55]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.12141, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.12141

    Loiacono, F., Gilli, R., Mignoli, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.12141, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.12141

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.12141 2025

  56. [56]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 981, 191, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada613

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada613

  57. [57]

    E., V olonteri, M., et al

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Volonteri, M., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.02662, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.02662

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.02662

  58. [58]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08032, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08032

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08032

  59. [59]

    Maiolinoet al., JWST meets Chandra: a large popu- lation of Compton thick, feedback-free, and intrinsically X-ray weak AGN, with a sprinkle of SNe, Mon

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.00504, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00504

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.00504 2024

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  61. [61]

    Marocco, F., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Fowler, J. W., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd805

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abd805 2021

  62. [62]

    , eprint =

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1, doi: 10.1086/426387

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/426387 2005

  63. [63]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  64. [64]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 2576, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1163

    Mezcua, M., Civano, F., Marchesi, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2576, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1163

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1163 2018

  65. [65]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 898, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba199

    Mezcua, M., & Dom´ ınguez S´ anchez, H. 2020, ApJL, 898, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba199

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba199 2020

  66. [66]

    2011, MNRAS, 418, 467, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19497.x

    Misgeld, I., & Hilker, M. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3699, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18669.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18669.x 2011

  67. [67]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 922, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ffa

    Salehirad, S. 2021, ApJ, 922, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ffa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ffa 2021

  68. [68]

    P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Oh, K., Koss, M., Markwardt, C. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa7fd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa7fd 2018

  70. [70]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L3, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158

    Pacucci, F., Nguyen, B., Carniani, S., Maiolino, R., & Fan, X. 2023, ApJL, 957, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158 2023

  71. [71]

    D., Greene, J

    Pardo, K., Goulding, A. D., Greene, J. E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 203, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/203 15

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/203 2016

  72. [72]

    Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 2011

  73. [73]

    Y., Ho, L

    Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2002, AJ, 124, 266, doi: 10.1086/340952 —. 2010, AJ, 139, 2097, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2097

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/340952 2002

  74. [74]

    Pettini, M., & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x 2004

  75. [75]

    2025, ApJ, 982, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd

    Pucha, R., Juneau, S., Dey, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd 2025

  76. [76]

    Reines, A. E. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 26, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01556-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01556-0 2022

  77. [77]

    E., & Comastri, A

    Reines, A. E., & Comastri, A. 2016, PASA, 33, e054, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2016.46

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2016.46 2016

  78. [78]

    E., Greene, J

    Reines, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Geha, M. 2013, ApJ, 775, 116, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/116

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/116 2013

  79. [79]

    E., & Volonteri, M

    Reines, A. E., & Volonteri, M. 2015, ApJ, 813, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/82

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/2/82 2015

  80. [80]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.09669, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.09669

    Sacchi, A., & Bogdan, A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.09669, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.09669

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.09669 2025

Showing first 80 references.