pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08476 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 💻 cs.CL

A Computational Operationalisation of Competing Maturational Theories of Syntactic Development via Statistical Grammar Induction

Mila Marcheva , Suchir Salhan , Weiwei Sun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords syntactic developmentmaturational theoriesgrammar inductionlanguage acquisitioncomputational modelingsyntactic categorieschild-directed speech
0
0 comments X

The pith

The growing maturational account of syntactic category emergence outperforms the inward account in a controlled statistical grammar induction test.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper operationalizes two competing theories of the order in which children acquire intermediate syntactic categories. Growing accounts predict that lexical and inflectional categories appear first, while inward accounts predict early access to discourse-related categories. By applying the same grammar induction algorithm to the same input corpus but enforcing different staged orderings of category introduction, the work measures which ordering yields more learnable syntactic structure. The growing ordering produces measurably stronger results across three evaluation metrics. This matters because it turns abstract maturational claims into concrete, comparable predictions about what grammars can be acquired from child-directed speech.

Core claim

When maturational hypotheses are turned into explicit staging constraints inside a statistical grammar induction procedure, the growing account—which introduces lexical and inflectional categories before others—yields significantly better induced grammars than the inward account—which introduces discourse-related categories early—under identical input data and learning algorithm.

What carries the argument

Staged statistical grammar induction that enforces a prescribed sequence of syntactic category emergence to simulate each maturational theory while keeping corpus and induction procedure fixed.

If this is right

  • Lexical-first ordering permits induction of more complete or accurate syntactic structures from the same child-directed input.
  • Discourse-first ordering restricts the set of grammars that remain learnable under constant conditions.
  • The three evaluation metrics all register a reliable advantage for the growing ordering.
  • Category acquisition order acts as a concrete constraint on the final state of the induced grammar.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same staged-induction method could test whether other proposed developmental sequences, such as those involving semantic or pragmatic categories, produce comparable differences in learnability.
  • If the growing advantage persists, models of early syntax should predict that children build clause structure from lexical and morphological foundations rather than from discourse markers.
  • The framework supplies a route for deriving specific, testable predictions about the kinds of syntactic errors children should make at successive stages.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen grammar induction algorithm and fixed corpus accurately instantiate the theoretical predictions of each maturational ordering without introducing extraneous biases.

What would settle it

Reversing the performance advantage when the same orderings are tested with a different but still neutral grammar induction algorithm, or when the induced grammars are compared directly against longitudinal records of children's actual productions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08476 by Mila Marcheva, Suchir Salhan, Weiwei Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pipeline for statistical learner modelling staged syn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: GROWING vs INWARD learning progression across the 5 learning stages, compared via F1, log psent, and JSD. GROWING consistently outperforms INWARD. For reference, the ORACLE grammar baseline for log psent = −6.1823 is pro￾vided. Higher F1 and log psent, and lower JSD, indicate better performance. overview of the F1 scores achieved by systems approximat￾ing the three syntactic development hypotheses we opera… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mean JSD for instrumental phrase-level NTs. G [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper is concerned with what intermediate syntactic categories children acquire during first language development, and in what order. Maturational theories make different predictions. Bottom-up accounts (GROWING) propose that lexical and inflectional structure emerges first, while inward accounts (INWARD) predict early access to discourse-related categories. We computationally operationalise these hypotheses of staged syntactic emergence using statistical grammar induction, asking what each proposed ordering makes learnable when input and learning algorithm are held constant. Our framework makes category acquisition explicit and allows us to explore how different maturational orderings shape the structure that can be learned under identical conditions. Based on this operationalisation, the GROWING account significantly outperforms the INWARD account across three evaluation metrics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computationally operationalizes two competing maturational theories of syntactic development—GROWING (bottom-up emergence of lexical and inflectional categories first) versus INWARD (early access to discourse-related categories)—by constraining category acquisition order within a fixed statistical grammar induction procedure applied to the same input corpus. It reports that the GROWING ordering yields significantly better performance than INWARD across three evaluation metrics, thereby providing evidence favoring bottom-up accounts.

Significance. If the operationalization is shown to faithfully instantiate the theoretical predictions without artifacts from the induction algorithm or metrics, the work offers a novel, explicit computational test of maturational hypotheses in language acquisition. This could help bridge theoretical linguistics and computational modeling by making staged category emergence testable under controlled conditions. The approach is strengthened by holding input and algorithm constant, which isolates the effect of ordering.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Operationalization of orderings): The description of how the statistical grammar induction algorithm enforces the GROWING versus INWARD category emergence sequences (e.g., via masking, initialization, or search constraints) must be expanded with pseudocode or explicit parameter settings. Without this, it remains unclear whether the reported performance gap arises from the maturational ordering itself or from incidental differences in how the fixed inducer handles the two regimes.
  2. [Evaluation] Evaluation section (metrics): The three evaluation metrics are referenced only generically in the abstract and results; their definitions, formulas, and mapping to children's syntactic development (as opposed to adult parsing accuracy or coverage on the fixed corpus) require explicit justification and comparison to developmental benchmarks. If the metrics are standard unsupervised parsing scores, they may not validly adjudicate the theories' claims about learnability.
  3. [§4] §4 (Results and statistical tests): The claim of significant outperformance needs reporting of exact effect sizes, p-values, confidence intervals, and ablation controls (e.g., random orderings or unconstrained induction) to confirm the difference is attributable to the maturational constraint rather than corpus or algorithm properties.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should name the three evaluation metrics and briefly note the corpus and induction algorithm used.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the two accounts (GROWING and INWARD) should be introduced with a short table or diagram in the introduction to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Operationalization of orderings): The description of how the statistical grammar induction algorithm enforces the GROWING versus INWARD category emergence sequences (e.g., via masking, initialization, or search constraints) must be expanded with pseudocode or explicit parameter settings. Without this, it remains unclear whether the reported performance gap arises from the maturational ordering itself or from incidental differences in how the fixed inducer handles the two regimes.

    Authors: We agree that the current description in §3 is insufficiently detailed for full reproducibility and to rule out implementation artifacts. In the revised manuscript, we have substantially expanded §3 to include pseudocode for the category emergence enforcement, along with explicit parameter settings for masking, prior initialization, and search constraints under each ordering. These additions confirm that both regimes operate within the identical fixed induction procedure, isolating the effect of the maturational sequence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation section (metrics): The three evaluation metrics are referenced only generically in the abstract and results; their definitions, formulas, and mapping to children's syntactic development (as opposed to adult parsing accuracy or coverage on the fixed corpus) require explicit justification and comparison to developmental benchmarks. If the metrics are standard unsupervised parsing scores, they may not validly adjudicate the theories' claims about learnability.

    Authors: We have revised the Evaluation section to provide the explicit definitions, formulas, and computation details for all three metrics. We also added a subsection discussing their relevance to syntactic development in children, citing developmental literature on category emergence and learnability. While the metrics derive from unsupervised parsing evaluation, we argue they appropriately test the theories' core claims about what syntactic structure becomes learnable under each ordering; however, we acknowledge they are computational proxies rather than direct behavioral benchmarks. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§4] §4 (Results and statistical tests): The claim of significant outperformance needs reporting of exact effect sizes, p-values, confidence intervals, and ablation controls (e.g., random orderings or unconstrained induction) to confirm the difference is attributable to the maturational constraint rather than corpus or algorithm properties.

    Authors: We have updated §4 to report the exact effect sizes, p-values, and confidence intervals from our statistical tests. We have also included results from the requested ablation controls (random orderings and unconstrained induction), which demonstrate that the performance advantage for GROWING is specific to the maturational ordering rather than corpus or algorithmic properties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper operationalises two distinct maturational orderings (GROWING vs INWARD) by constraining category emergence within an otherwise fixed statistical grammar induction procedure and fixed corpus, then compares performance on three evaluation metrics. This setup tests which ordering makes more structure learnable under controlled conditions; the reported outperformance of GROWING is an empirical outcome of that comparison rather than a definitional equivalence or a fitted parameter relabelled as a prediction. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes appear in the provided text that would reduce the central claim to its inputs by construction. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that grammar induction can serve as a proxy for child syntactic learning and that the chosen metrics reflect learnability differences attributable to maturational ordering.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Statistical grammar induction algorithms can be constrained to acquire categories in a prescribed developmental order while still learning from the same surface input.
    Invoked to make the GROWING and INWARD orderings testable under identical conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5421 in / 1196 out tokens · 58283 ms · 2026-05-12T01:52:39.595069+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Locality and Extended Projection , ISBN =

    Grimshaw, Jane , year =. Locality and Extended Projection , ISBN =. doi:10.1075/cilt.197.07gri , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1075/cilt.197.07gri

  2. [2]

    The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , editor =

    Grimshaw, Jane , title =. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , editor =

    work page

  3. [3]

    1998 , isbn =

    Sir Harold Jeffreys , title =. 1998 , isbn =

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    1991, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37, 145, doi: 10.1109/18.61115

    Lin, J. , year =. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , publisher =. doi:10.1109/18.61115 , number =

    work page doi:10.1109/18.61115

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , volume =

    Marcheva, Mila and Biberauer, Theresa and Sun, Weiwei , title =. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , volume =. 2025 , url =

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Grammar induction from (lots of) words alone

    Pate, John K and Johnson, Mark. Grammar induction from (lots of) words alone. Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Using Universal Linguistic Knowledge to Guide Grammar Induction

    Naseem, Tahira and Chen, Harr and Barzilay, Regina and Johnson, Mark. Using Universal Linguistic Knowledge to Guide Grammar Induction. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Why do language models perform worse for morphologically complex languages?

    Arnett, Catherine and Bergen, Benjamin. Why do language models perform worse for morphologically complex languages?. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Proceedings of the ICML 2025 Tokenization Workshop (TokShop) , series =

    Evaluating Morphological Alignment of Tokenizers in 70 Languages , author =. Proceedings of the ICML 2025 Tokenization Workshop (TokShop) , series =. 2025 , address =

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Language structure reflects biases in pattern learning across domains and modalities , volume =

    Culbertson, Jennifer and Compostella, Arianna and Kirby, Simon , year =. Language structure reflects biases in pattern learning across domains and modalities , volume =. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , publisher =. doi:10.1177/17470218241282404 , number =

    work page doi:10.1177/17470218241282404

  11. [11]

    Remarks on Nominalization , year =

    Chomsky, Noam , booktitle =. Remarks on Nominalization , year =

    work page

  12. [12]

    Jackendoff, Ray , year =. X-bar-

    work page

  13. [13]

    2021 , publisher=

    Syntax: A Generative Introduction, 4th Edition , author=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    1987 , url =

    Abney, Steven , title =. 1987 , url =

    work page 1987

  15. [15]

    2024 , author =

    Emergent. 2024 , author =

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? , volume =

    Chater, Nick and Vitányi, Paul , year =. Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? , volume =. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , publisher =. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00005-0 , number =

    work page doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00005-0

  17. [17]

    Developmental Psychology , year =

    Culbertson, Jennifer and Koulaguina, Elena and Gonzalez-Gomez, Nayeli and Legendre, Géraldine and Nazzi, Thierry , title =. Developmental Psychology , year =

    work page

  18. [18]

    Less is More: Pre-Training Cross-Lingual Small-Scale Language Models with Cognitively-Plausible Curriculum Learning Strategies

    Salhan, Suchir and Diehl Martinez, Richard and Goriely, Z \'e bulon and Buttery, Paula. Less is More: Pre-Training Cross-Lingual Small-Scale Language Models with Cognitively-Plausible Curriculum Learning Strategies. The 2nd BabyLM Challenge at the 28th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    On Phases , ISBN =

    Chomsky, Noam , year =. On Phases , ISBN =. doi:10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009

  20. [20]

    Derivation by Phase , booktitle =

    Chomsky, Noam , year =. Derivation by Phase , ISBN =. doi:10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004

  21. [21]

    Two Experiments on Learning Probabilistic Dependency Grammars from Corpora , url =

    Carroll, Glenn and Charniak, Eugene , biburl =. Two Experiments on Learning Probabilistic Dependency Grammars from Corpora , url =

    work page

  22. [22]

    Corpus-Based Induction of Syntactic Structure: Models of Dependency and Constituency

    Klein, Dan and Manning, Christopher. Corpus-Based Induction of Syntactic Structure: Models of Dependency and Constituency. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ( ACL -04). 2004. doi:10.3115/1218955.1219016

    work page doi:10.3115/1218955.1219016 2004

  23. [23]

    2005 , publisher=

    The unsupervised learning of natural language structure , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    Compound Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars for Grammar Induction

    Kim, Yoon and Dyer, Chris and Rush, Alexander. Compound Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars for Grammar Induction. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019. doi:10.18653/v1/P19-1228

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1228 2019

  25. [25]

    The Return of Lexical Dependencies: Neural Lexicalized PCFG s

    Zhu, Hao and Bisk, Yonatan and Neubig, Graham. The Return of Lexical Dependencies: Neural Lexicalized PCFG s. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2020. doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00337

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00337 2020

  26. [26]

    Neural Bi-Lexicalized PCFG Induction

    Yang, Songlin and Zhao, Yanpeng and Tu, Kewei. Neural Bi-Lexicalized PCFG Induction. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.209

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.209 2021

  27. [27]

    Simple Hardware-Efficient PCFG s with Independent Left and Right Productions

    Liu, Wei and Yang, Songlin and Kim, Yoon and Tu, Kewei. Simple Hardware-Efficient PCFG s with Independent Left and Right Productions. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. 2023. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.113

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.113 2023

  28. [28]

    PCFG s Can Do Better: Inducing Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars with Many Symbols

    Yang, Songlin and Zhao, Yanpeng and Tu, Kewei. PCFG s Can Do Better: Inducing Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars with Many Symbols. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.117

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.117 2021

  29. [29]

    Pearl and Jon Sprouse , year = 2013, title =

    Lisa S. Pearl and Jon Sprouse , year = 2013, title =. Language Acquisition , url =

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Profiling neural grammar induction on morphemically tokenised child-directed speech

    Marcheva, Mila and Biberauer, Theresa and Sun, Weiwei. Profiling neural grammar induction on morphemically tokenised child-directed speech. Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics. 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.cmcl-1.7

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.cmcl-1.7 2025

  31. [31]

    Rethinking Formal Hierarchies: A Proposed Unification , volume =

    Biberauer, Theresa and Ian, Roberts , year =. Rethinking Formal Hierarchies: A Proposed Unification , volume =. Beyond Functional Sequence , url =

    work page

  32. [32]

    Unsupervised Grammar Induction with Depth-bounded PCFG

    Jin, Lifeng and Doshi-Velez, Finale and Miller, Timothy and Schuler, William and Schwartz, Lane. Unsupervised Grammar Induction with Depth-bounded PCFG. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2018. doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00016

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00016 2018

  33. [33]

    A Quantitative Evaluation of Naturalistic Models of Language Acquisition; the Efficiency of the Triggering Learning Algorithm Compared to a Categorial Grammar Learner

    Buttery, Paula. A Quantitative Evaluation of Naturalistic Models of Language Acquisition; the Efficiency of the Triggering Learning Algorithm Compared to a Categorial Grammar Learner. Proceedings of the Workshop on Psycho-Computational Models of Human Language Acquisition. 2004

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    , title =

    Buttery, Paula J. , title =. doi:10.48456/tr-675 , number =

    work page doi:10.48456/tr-675

  35. [35]

    Categorial granularity in syntactic acquisition: A multilingual corpus study on the left periphery , journal =

    Bosch, N. Categorial granularity in syntactic acquisition: A multilingual corpus study on the left periphery , journal =. 2025 , volume =

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Rethinking structural growth: Insights from the acquisition of interactional language , volume =

    Heim, Johannes and Wiltschko, Martina , year =. Rethinking structural growth: Insights from the acquisition of interactional language , volume =. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics , publisher =. doi:10.16995/glossa.16396 , number =

    work page doi:10.16995/glossa.16396

  37. [37]

    Advances in Greek generative syntax: In honor of Dimitra Theophanopoulou-Kontou , editor =

    Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria , title =. Advances in Greek generative syntax: In honor of Dimitra Theophanopoulou-Kontou , editor =. 2005 , doi =

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    2003 , school =

    Galasso, Joseph , title =. 2003 , school =

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Radford, Andrew , title =

    work page

  40. [40]

    Language Acquisition , volume =

    Rizzi, Luigi , title =. Language Acquisition , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    work page 1993

  41. [41]

    Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery , volume =

    Friedmann, Naama and Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi , year =. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery , volume =. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics , publisher =. doi:10.16995/glossa.5877 , number =

    work page doi:10.16995/glossa.5877

  42. [42]

    The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy , ISBN =

    Westergaard, Marit , year =. The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy , ISBN =. doi:10.1075/la.145 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1075/la.145

  43. [43]

    Factors 2 i 3: cap a un enfocament fonamentat , ISSN =

    Biberauer, Theresa , year =. Factors 2 i 3: cap a un enfocament fonamentat , ISSN =. doi:10.5565/rev/catjl.219 , journal =

    work page doi:10.5565/rev/catjl.219

  44. [44]

    On the Formal Flexibility of Syntactic Categories , publisher =

    Song, Chenchen , keywords =. On the Formal Flexibility of Syntactic Categories , publisher =. 2019 , copyright =. doi:10.17863/CAM.44842 , url =

    work page doi:10.17863/cam.44842 2019

  45. [45]

    The language-cognition interface , pages=

    Language acquisition as statistical inference , author=. The language-cognition interface , pages=

    work page

  46. [46]

    Psychonomic bulletin & review , volume=

    Marr’s levels and the minimalist program , author=. Psychonomic bulletin & review , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Induction of Linguistic Structure with C ombinatory C ategorial G rammars

    Bisk, Yonatan and Hockenmaier, Julia. Induction of Linguistic Structure with C ombinatory C ategorial G rammars. Proceedings of the NAACL - HLT Workshop on the Induction of Linguistic Structure. 2012

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Probing the Linguistic Strengths and Limitations of Unsupervised Grammar Induction

    Bisk, Yonatan and Hockenmaier, Julia. Probing the Linguistic Strengths and Limitations of Unsupervised Grammar Induction. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015. doi:10.3115/v1/P15-1135

    work page doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1135 2015

  49. [49]

    Characterizing the Errors of Data-Driven Dependency Parsing Models

    McDonald, Ryan and Nivre, Joakim. Characterizing the Errors of Data-Driven Dependency Parsing Models. Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning ( EMNLP - C o NLL ). 2007

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    Categorial grammar induction from raw data

    Clark, Christian and Schuler, William. Categorial grammar induction from raw data. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. 2023. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.149

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.149 2023

  51. [51]

    doi:10.35111/WF9P-G717 , url =

    Treebank-2 , publisher =. doi:10.35111/WF9P-G717 , url =

    work page doi:10.35111/wf9p-g717

  52. [52]

    Gdaniec and Ralph Grishman and Philip Harrison and Donald Hindle and Robert Ingria and Mitch Marcus and Beatrice Santorini and Tomek Strzalkowski , title =

    Ezra Black and Steven Abney and Dan Flickinger and Claudia H. Gdaniec and Ralph Grishman and Philip Harrison and Donald Hindle and Robert Ingria and Mitch Marcus and Beatrice Santorini and Tomek Strzalkowski , title =. Proceedings of the February 1991 DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop , year =

    work page 1991

  53. [53]

    , author=

    Development of the first language in the human species. , author=. American psychologist , volume=. 1973 , publisher=

    work page 1973

  54. [54]

    Acquiring a language vs

    Dupre, Gabe , year =. Acquiring a language vs. inducing a grammar , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105771 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105771 2024

  55. [55]

    Variational Bayesian Grammar Induction for Natural Language , ISBN =

    Kurihara, Kenichi and Sato, Taisuke , year =. Variational Bayesian Grammar Induction for Natural Language , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/11872436_8 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1007/11872436_8

  56. [56]

    Inside-Outside Reestimation From Partially Bracketed Corpora

    Pereira, Fernando and Schabes, Yves. Inside-Outside Reestimation From Partially Bracketed Corpora. 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1992. doi:10.3115/981967.981984

    work page doi:10.3115/981967.981984 1992

  57. [57]

    A Generative Constituent-Context Model for Improved Grammar Induction

    Klein, Dan and Manning, Christopher D. A Generative Constituent-Context Model for Improved Grammar Induction. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2002. doi:10.3115/1073083.1073106

    work page doi:10.3115/1073083.1073106 2002

  58. [58]

    The Infinite PCFG Using Hierarchical D irichlet Processes

    Liang, Percy and Petrov, Slav and Jordan, Michael and Klein, Dan. The Infinite PCFG Using Hierarchical D irichlet Processes. Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning ( EMNLP - C o NLL ). 2007

    work page 2007

  59. [59]

    B ayesian Inference for PCFG s via M arkov Chain M onte C arlo

    Johnson, Mark and Griffiths, Thomas and Goldwater, Sharon. B ayesian Inference for PCFG s via M arkov Chain M onte C arlo. Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference. 2007

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    and Alshawi, Hiyan and Jurafsky, Daniel

    Spitkovsky, Valentin I. and Alshawi, Hiyan and Jurafsky, Daniel. From Baby Steps to Leapfrog: How ``Less is More'' in Unsupervised Dependency Parsing. Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2010

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Bengio, J

    Bengio, Yoshua and Louradour, Jér\^ome and Collobert, Ronan and Weston, Jason , year =. Curriculum learning , url =. doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380

  62. [62]

    Individual comparisons by ranking methods,

    Wilcoxon, Frank , year =. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , volume =. Biometrics Bulletin , publisher =. doi:10.2307/3001968 , number =

    work page doi:10.2307/3001968

  63. [63]

    The Language-Cognition Interface , publisher =

    Mark Johnson , title =. The Language-Cognition Interface , publisher =

    work page

  64. [64]

    Tenenbaum and Terry Regier , title =

    Andrew Perfors and Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Terry Regier , title =. 2011 , month = mar, publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.001 2011

  65. [65]

    A Probabilistic Model of Syntactic and Semantic Acquisition from Child-Directed Utterances and their Meanings

    Kwiatkowski, Tom and Goldwater, Sharon and Zettlemoyer, Luke and Steedman, Mark. A Probabilistic Model of Syntactic and Semantic Acquisition from Child-Directed Utterances and their Meanings. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the E uropean Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2012

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    1984 , publisher =

    Pinker, Steven , title =. 1984 , publisher =

    work page 1984

  67. [67]

    Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS) 22 , pages =

    Boser, Katherine and Lust, Barbara and Santelmann, Lynn and Whitman, John , title =. Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS) 22 , pages =. 1992 , address =

    work page 1992

  68. [68]

    Transactions of the Philological Society , volume =

    Radford, Andrew , title =. Transactions of the Philological Society , volume =. 1988 , doi =

    work page 1988

  69. [69]

    1990 , publisher =

    Radford, Andrew , title =. 1990 , publisher =

    work page 1990

  70. [70]

    Language Acquisition , volume =

    Guasti, Maria Teresa , title =. Language Acquisition , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    work page 1993

  71. [71]

    Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar , editor =

    Clahsen, Harald and Eisenbeiss, Sonja and Vainikka, Anne , title =. Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar , editor =. 1994 , publisher =

    work page 1994

  72. [72]

    A Universal Part-of-Speech Tagset

    Petrov, Slav and Das, Dipanjan and McDonald, Ryan. A Universal Part-of-Speech Tagset. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation ( LREC '12). 2012

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency , volume =

    Lieven, Elena , year =. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency , volume =. Lingua , publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005 , number =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005 2010

  74. [74]

    Language and Cognition , author=

    Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here? , volume=. Language and Cognition , author=. 2016 , pages=. doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.16 , number=

    work page doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.16 2016

  75. [75]

    Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , ISBN =

    Tomasello, Michael , year =. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , ISBN =. doi:10.2307/j.ctv26070v8 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.2307/j.ctv26070v8

  76. [76]

    Children's first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective: In P.Robinson and N.Ellis (eds)

    Elena Lieven and Michael Tomasello. Children's first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective: In P.Robinson and N.Ellis (eds). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. 2008

    work page 2008

  77. [77]

    Mechanisms of Language Acquisition , editor =

    Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian , title =. Mechanisms of Language Acquisition , editor =

    work page

  78. [78]

    Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , volume =

    Tomasello, Michael , year =. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , volume =. Cognition , publisher =. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00069-4 , number =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00069-4

  79. [79]

    Constructivist Approaches to First Language Acquisition , volume =

    Behrens, Heike , year =. Constructivist Approaches to First Language Acquisition , volume =. Journal of Child Language , publisher =. doi:10.1017/s0305000921000556 , number =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305000921000556

  80. [80]

    The emergentist program , volume =

    O’Grady, William , year =. The emergentist program , volume =. Lingua , publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.12.001 , number =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.12.001 2006

Showing first 80 references.