arxiv: 2605.08851 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.LG

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Geometrically Constrained Stenosis Editing in Coronary Angiography via Entropic Optimal Transport

Jialin Li , Zhuo Zhang , Yue Cao , Guipeng Lan , Jiabao Wen , Shuai Xiao , Jiachen Yang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 05:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

keywords coronary angiographystenosis editingentropic optimal transportsynthetic data augmentationstenosis detectiongeometric constraintsmedical image synthesis

0 comments

The pith

Constrained entropic optimal transport enables precise geometric editing of stenoses in coronary angiograms for better detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tackles the scarcity of high-quality coronary angiography data for training stenosis detectors by generating synthetic edits that augment training sets. It introduces the OT-Bridge Editor, which casts localized editing as a geometrically constrained entropic optimal transport problem to steer the process with anatomical information. This yields stronger pixel-level control and structure preservation than diffusion-based soft guidance methods. A sympathetic reader would care because improved synthetic data could lead to more accurate and generalizable automated tools for diagnosing coronary artery disease.

Core claim

The OT-Bridge Editor reframes localized stenosis editing as a constrained entropic optimal transport problem and uses geometric information to steer the generation path for stronger control. The resulting synthetic angiograms, when added to training sets, produce relative gains of 27.8 percent on the public ARCADE benchmark and 23.0 percent on a multi-center dataset in downstream stenosis detection, with supporting qualitative improvements.

What carries the argument

The OT-Bridge Editor, which formulates image editing as a geometrically constrained entropic optimal transport problem to enforce anatomical fidelity while synthesizing realistic stenoses.

If this is right

Synthesized angiograms augment training sets to increase data diversity and distributional coverage.
The method delivers higher geometric control and pixel-level precision than diffusion-based editing approaches.
Downstream stenosis detectors show consistent gains in precision and generalization on both public and multi-center data.
Qualitative results confirm that the edits maintain realistic pathological appearance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The constrained transport approach could extend to precise editing tasks in other medical imaging domains where anatomical structure must be preserved.
Better synthetic data quality may reduce dependence on scarce real patient scans and ease privacy constraints in cardiovascular AI development.
Combining this OT-based editing with existing generative models could produce hybrid synthesis pipelines for even higher fidelity.

Load-bearing premise

That the geometric constraints in the entropic OT formulation preserve anatomical fidelity enough to make the edited stenoses distributionally similar to real pathology without introducing artifacts that hurt detector performance.

What would settle it

Train a stenosis detector on the augmented synthetic data and test it on a large independent set of real angiograms; if accuracy falls below a real-data-only baseline, the improvement claim is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08851 by Guipeng Lan, Jiabao Wen, Jiachen Yang, Jialin Li, Shuai Xiao, Yue Cao, Zhuo Zhang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Conceptual comparison between conditional diffusion and OT-Bridge Editor. OT-Bridge Editor fixes the start state S ∗ (edited vessel-structure) and enforces hard, path-level guidance (GPG) within a Schrodinger-bridge formulation, producing a de- ¨ terministic generation path toward the target. structions (Brooks et al., 2023), binary masks (Lugmayr et al., 2022), semantic segmentations (Park et al., 2019), … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of OT-Bridge Editor. (a) We build a vessel-structure composite start state S ∗ from an edited mask m and its geometric cues (edges and boundary). (b) A constrained diffusion Schrodinger bridge implements entropic OT under hard geometric constraints, ¨ producing a bridge process P ∗ relative to the reference process R; each step combines an SB transition with path-level guidance (GPG) and a project… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: GPG constrains the entire SB rollout. Starting from an unconstrained SB trajectory (orange), intermediate states may drift and introduce off-target changes (red boxes). GPG applies step-wise geometric supervision at each bridge step (green arrows), pulling the path into a geometry-feasible corridor (blue) that preserves non-target anatomy while enforcing the desired stenosis geometry inside the editing re… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Qualitative results for location and shape controlled stenosis editing. We shows an edited CAG for a target stenosis position in the Proximal, Mid, Distal, and Terminal segments. The red box marks the target region, and the right column provides zoomed views of the edited Stenosis ROI and the corresponding Original ROI. The edits producing pixel-accurate stenosis insertion while preserving vessel appearanc… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of geometry-constrained stenosis editing on CAG. For six representative cases (A-D), we show the input CAG and the desired structural change specified by an edited vessel mask, followed by results from baselines and our OT-Bridge Editor. Red boxes indicate the target region on the original image; yellow boxes highlight the same region across methods. Synth-only (Stand-alone Quality) … view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Performance gain analysis on ARCADE. We compare Synth-only mAP@0.5 (stand-alone fidelity) and Real+Synth mAP@0.5 (complementary usefulness), showing that OT-Bridge Editor achieves the best trade-off and the strongest overall gains. 4.4.2. WHY GEOMETRIC GENERATION-PATH GUIDANCE ACHIEVES PIXEL-LEVEL EDITING? To isolate the effect of geometric generation-path guidance (GPG), we ablate whether geometric constr… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: How GPG acts at one intermediate step. A.2. Experimental protocols A.2.1. DATASETS AND HARDWARE FOR EXPERIMENTS Real datasets and splits. We evaluate on two real-world CAG datasets. First, we use the public ARCADE benchmark with Train/Val/Test splits of 1,000/100/100 real images. Second, we collect a multi-center internal dataset from three difference centers, with Train/Val/Test splits of 5000/500/500 rea… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Qualitative results for location-controlled stenosis editing across coronary segments. For five representative cases (A-E), we show the original CAG (left) and the edited outputs with target stenosis placed in the Proximal, Mid, Distal, and Terminal segments (columns 2-5). Red boxes mark the target region on the original image, and yellow boxes highlight the same region in the edited results with zoomed-in… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Qualitative comparison of geometry-constrained stenosis editing on CAG. For six representative cases (A-F), we show the input CAG and the desired structural change specified by an edited vessel mask, followed by results from baselines and our OT-Bridge Editor. Red boxes indicate the target region on the original image; yellow boxes highlight the same region across methods. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful… view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Visualization of the reverse bridge trajectory under geometric guidance. Columns show intermediate states from t=0 to t=1 (right to left), starting from the vessel-structure condition; the last column shows the corresponding segmentation constraint. Across diverse cases (rows), the trajectory progressively transfers structural information into the angiogram domain while preserving vessel topology and supp… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The scarcity of high-quality imaging data for coronary angiography (CAG) stenosis limits the clinical translation of automated stenosis detection. Synthetic stenosis data provides a practical avenue to augment training sets, improving data quality, diversity, and distributional coverage, and enhancing detection precision and generalization. However, diffusion-based editing commonly relies on soft guidance in a noise-initialized reverse process, offering limited pixel-level precision and structure preservation. We propose the OT-Bridge Editor, which reframes localized editing as a constrained entropic optimal transport (OT) problem and leverages geometric information to steer the generation path, enabling stronger geometric control. Extensive experiments show that our synthesized angiograms consistently improve downstream stenosis detection, yielding substantial relative gains of 27.8% on the public ARCADE benchmark and 23.0% on our multi-center dataset, supported by consistent qualitative results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The OT-Bridge Editor reframes CAG stenosis synthesis as geometrically constrained entropic OT and reports clear downstream detection gains, but the experiments do not isolate whether the geometric term drives the lift or if any added synthetic volume would suffice.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper applies entropic optimal transport with explicit geometric steering to edit coronary angiograms and insert stenosis, then shows the resulting images improve detection models by 27.8% relative on ARCADE and 23% on their multi-center set. The approach is positioned against diffusion methods that rely on soft guidance and lose pixel-level control, which is a reasonable contrast for this localized editing task. The formulation itself looks like a direct way to enforce structure preservation while moving mass to create pathology, and the qualitative examples are described as consistent. That combination for CAG data is not in the cited prior work, so the framing counts as new. The gains are presented as empirical results on external benchmarks with no obvious self-referential definitions, which keeps the circularity burden low. The problem itself matters: real CAG stenosis data is scarce, and better augmentation could help clinical detection models. On the soft spots, the abstract supplies no baseline numbers, no statistical tests, and no ablation that keeps augmentation count fixed while dropping or weakening the geometric constraint. Without that isolation, the stress-test point holds weight—the reported improvements could come from simply increasing training diversity rather than the OT geometry specifically. The full methods section would need to show how the geometric term is implemented, whether it avoids systematic artifacts, and how the edits compare distributionally to real cases. Error analysis is also missing from the summary. This paper is aimed at groups working on medical image synthesis, optimal transport applications, or cardiac AI augmentation. A reader focused on practical data-scarcity fixes in high-stakes imaging would get usable ideas from the method description. It deserves a serious referee because the core problem is important, the OT angle is distinct enough to review in detail, and the claimed gains are large enough to check rigorously, even if the current write-up needs more controls and baselines before acceptance.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes the OT-Bridge Editor, which reframes localized stenosis editing in coronary angiography images as a constrained entropic optimal transport problem that incorporates geometric information to steer the transport plan. This is positioned as providing stronger pixel-level precision and anatomical structure preservation than diffusion-based soft-guidance methods. The central empirical claim is that the resulting synthetic angiograms yield substantial relative improvements in downstream stenosis detection: 27.8% on the public ARCADE benchmark and 23.0% on a multi-center dataset, supported by qualitative results.

Significance. If the geometric constraints in the entropic OT formulation demonstrably isolate the source of the reported gains and preserve anatomical fidelity without introducing systematic artifacts, the work would offer a principled alternative to diffusion editing for medical image augmentation in data-scarce domains. The approach could improve detector generalization by producing distributionally realistic pathology edits, but this hinges on the experimental isolation of the geometric term.

major comments (2)

[Experiments] Experiments section: the headline relative gains of 27.8% (ARCADE) and 23.0% (multi-center) are reported without an ablation that holds the number of augmented samples fixed while removing or weakening the geometric constraint term in the OT formulation. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the improvements could arise from generic data-volume effects rather than the specific entropic OT + geometric steering mechanism.
[Methods] Methods / Abstract: no quantitative error analysis, statistical significance tests, or baseline detector details (architecture, training protocol, exact augmentation counts) are supplied to support the pixel-level precision claim. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the OT-Bridge Editor outperforms plausible alternatives (unconstrained OT, GAN, or diffusion) under matched conditions.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'supported by consistent qualitative results' is vague; the manuscript should specify which visual criteria (e.g., vessel continuity, stenosis boundary sharpness) were evaluated and by whom.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the experimental isolation of our contributions and improve reproducibility. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested analyses and details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: the headline relative gains of 27.8% (ARCADE) and 23.0% (multi-center) are reported without an ablation that holds the number of augmented samples fixed while removing or weakening the geometric constraint term in the OT formulation. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the improvements could arise from generic data-volume effects rather than the specific entropic OT + geometric steering mechanism.

Authors: We agree that an ablation holding the number of augmented samples fixed while ablating the geometric constraint is essential to isolate its contribution. In the revised manuscript we have added this experiment: we compare the full geometrically constrained OT-Bridge Editor against an unconstrained entropic OT baseline (and a weakened geometric term variant) while using exactly the same number of synthetic samples for detector training. The results show that removing or weakening the geometric term reduces the relative gains to 9.2% and 11.4% on ARCADE (and correspondingly lower on the multi-center set), confirming that the reported improvements stem from the geometric steering rather than data volume alone. These new results appear in the updated Experiments section with corresponding tables. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods] Methods / Abstract: no quantitative error analysis, statistical significance tests, or baseline detector details (architecture, training protocol, exact augmentation counts) are supplied to support the pixel-level precision claim. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the OT-Bridge Editor outperforms plausible alternatives (unconstrained OT, GAN, or diffusion) under matched conditions.

Authors: We acknowledge the need for these details to support the pixel-level precision and comparative claims. The revised manuscript now includes: (i) quantitative error metrics (MSE and SSIM on edited stenosis regions versus ground-truth edits), (ii) statistical significance testing (paired t-tests with p-values reported for all detection improvements), (iii) full detector specifications (ResNet-50 backbone, training schedule, optimizer, and exact augmentation counts per dataset), and (iv) matched-condition comparisons against unconstrained OT, a GAN-based editor, and a diffusion baseline. These additions are placed in the Methods and Experiments sections with new tables and text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the OT-Bridge Editor derivation or claims

full rationale

The paper reframes localized stenosis editing as a constrained entropic optimal transport problem that incorporates geometric steering. No equations, parameters, or performance metrics are shown to reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or prior self-citations. The reported relative gains (27.8% on ARCADE, 23.0% on multi-center data) are presented strictly as empirical outcomes on external benchmarks rather than as predictions derived from the method's own fitted quantities. The derivation chain remains self-contained with independent content from the geometric OT formulation and does not rely on load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents identification of specific free parameters or axioms; the method is described at the level of a reframing rather than a derivation from first principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5465 in / 1046 out tokens · 44925 ms · 2026-05-15T05:11:30.246696+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

reframes localized editing as a constrained entropic optimal transport (OT) problem ... Schrödinger Bridge ... geometric generation-path guidance (GPG)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

feasibility set F = {x | x⊙M̄ = x0⊙M̄, S(x⊙M)=S⋆}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

9 Geometrically Constrained Stenosis Editing in Coronary Angiography via Entropic Optimal Transport Elder, J. H. and Goldberg, R. M. Image editing in the con- tour domain. InProceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Soci- ety Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (Cat. No. 98CB36231), pp. 374–381. IEEE,

work page 1998
[2]

Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Control

Hertz, A., Mokady, R., Tenenbaum, J., Aberman, K., Pritch, Y ., and Cohen-Or, D. Prompt-to-prompt im- age editing with cross attention control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

Kantorovich, L

Accessed: 2026-05-09. Kantorovich, L. V . On the translocation of masses.Journal of mathematical sciences, 133(4),

work page 2026
[4]

Kim, B., Kwon, G., Kim, K., and Ye, J. C. Unpaired image- to-image translation via neural Schr¨odinger bridge.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15086,

work page arXiv
[5]

Inner information analysis algorithm for deep neural network based on community

Lan, G., Xiao, S., Xi, M., Wen, J., and Yang, J. Inner information analysis algorithm for deep neural network based on community. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2025, pp. 4953–4973,

work page 2025
[6]

A survey of the schr \” odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport.arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0215,

L´eonard, C. A survey of the schr \” odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport.arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0215,

work page arXiv
[7]

Bbdm: Image-to- image translation with brownian bridge diffusion models

Li, B., Xue, K., Liu, B., and Lai, Y .-K. Bbdm: Image-to- image translation with brownian bridge diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern Recognition, pp. 1952–1961,

work page 1952
[8]

Rtmdet: An empirical study of designing real-time object detectors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.07784,

Lyu, C., Zhang, W., Huang, H., Zhou, Y ., Wang, Y ., Liu, Y ., Zhang, S., and Chen, K. Rtmdet: An empirical study of designing real-time object detectors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.07784,

work page arXiv
[9]

SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equations

Meng, C., He, Y ., Song, Y ., Song, J., Wu, J., Zhu, J.-Y ., and Ermon, S. Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and edit- ing with stochastic differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[10]

Dsbrouter: End-to-end global routing via diffusion schr\”{o} dinger bridge

Shi, L., Zhang, S., Du, X., Yang, N., and Yan, J. Dsbrouter: End-to-end global routing via diffusion schr\”{o} dinger bridge. InForty-second International Conference on Machine Learning. Somnath, V . R., Pariset, M., Hsieh, Y .-P., Martinez, M. R., Krause, A., and Bunne, C. Aligned diffusion schr ¨odinger bridges. InUncertainty in Artificial Intelligence,...

work page 1985
[11]

Dual diffusion implicit bridges for image-to-image translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08382,

Su, X., Song, J., Meng, C., and Ermon, S. Dual diffusion implicit bridges for image-to-image translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08382,

work page arXiv
[12]

Semantic image synthesis via diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00050,

Wang, W., Bao, J., Zhou, W., Chen, D., Chen, D., Yuan, L., and Li, H. Semantic image synthesis via diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00050,

work page arXiv
[13]

DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection

Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L. M., and Shum, H.-Y . Dino: Detr with improved denois- ing anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03605,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[14]

Implementation Details A.1

12 Geometrically Constrained Stenosis Editing in Coronary Angiography via Entropic Optimal Transport A. Implementation Details A.1. Geometric Generation-Path Guidance Details GPG can be viewed as a projected dynamics that aligns a Schr ¨odinger-bridge (SB) rollout with a geometric feasibility corridor. As illustrated in Fig. 8, an unconstrained SB transit...

work page 2014