pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13992 · v2 · pith:GDH2YCQMnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Monolithic axial InGaAs quantum dot emitters in GaAs-based nanowires via Sb-mediated facet engineering

Hyowon W. Jeong , Aris Koulas-Simos , Imad Limame , Markus D\"oblinger , Sang Kyu Kim , Chirag C. Palekar , Jonathan J. Finley , Stephan Reitzenstein
show 1 more author
Gregor Koblm\"uller
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 07:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords InGaAs quantum dotsGaAs nanowiressingle-photon emittersantimony incorporationfacet engineeringrotational twinsmonolithic integrationquantum photonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dilute antimony incorporation suppresses rotational twins in GaAs nanowires to enable abrupt axial InGaAs quantum dot emitters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops InGaAs quantum emitters inside GaAs nanowires by adding dilute antimony during growth. This addition alters facet evolution, which reduces rotational twins that otherwise cause lateral overgrowth and blurred interfaces. With fewer twins the InGaAs inserts as thin confined layers along the nanowire axis at the growth front. Single-nanowire measurements then show bright localized emission with lifetimes down to 0.51 ns and clear antibunching below 0.4, confirming single-photon behavior. The results tie lower twin density directly to successful axial heterostructure formation for monolithic quantum sources.

Core claim

By tailoring facet evolution via dilute Sb incorporation, which efficiently suppresses twins and promotes confined axial insertion at the growth-front facet, the approach significantly enhances the probability of obtaining abrupt, few-nanometer-thin quantum dots at the nanowire tip. Single-nanowire optical spectroscopy reveals intense, spatially localized emission from the active region with lifetimes as short as (0.51 ± 0.02) ns, and second-order photon-correlation measurements consistently exhibit pronounced antibunching with g^(2)(0)<0.4, confirming single-photon emission.

What carries the argument

Sb-mediated facet engineering that suppresses rotational twins and promotes confined axial InGaAs insertion at the nanowire growth front.

If this is right

  • Single-nanowire spectroscopy shows intense spatially localized emission from the active region.
  • Emission lifetimes reach as short as 0.51 ns.
  • Photon correlations yield g^(2)(0) < 0.4, confirming single-photon emission.
  • Twin density correlates strongly with the success of axial heterostructure formation.
  • Defect control is identified as essential for monolithically integrated nanowire single-photon sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dilute Sb strategy could be tested in other III-V nanowire heterostructures to improve interface abruptness.
  • Avoiding post-growth transfer steps may become easier when placing these emitters on silicon photonic circuits.
  • Lower twin densities could benefit nanowire optoelectronic devices beyond single-photon sources.
  • Quantifying the minimum Sb concentration needed for twin suppression under different growth conditions would be a direct next measurement.

Load-bearing premise

Dilute Sb incorporation is the main cause of twin suppression and abrupt axial InGaAs insertion rather than other unstated growth parameters or substrate effects.

What would settle it

Growing the same nanowires without any antimony and still obtaining abrupt axial InGaAs quantum dots with comparable single-photon emission would disprove the claimed dominant role of Sb.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13992 by Aris Koulas-Simos, Chirag C. Palekar, Gregor Koblm\"uller, Hyowon W. Jeong, Imad Limame, Jonathan J. Finley, Markus D\"oblinger, Sang Kyu Kim, Stephan Reitzenstein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Growth concept and structural overview of axially embedded QDs in NWs. (a) Schematic illustration of an InGaAs-based QD axially embedded within a GaAs-based NW directly grown on a SAE-prepatterned SiO2/Si(111) substrate. (b) Magnified schematic of the InGaAs(Sb) region, where axial growth is promoted on the (111)B top facet of the underlying NW core (i) while undesired growth on the {-1-10} inclined facets… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Microstructural and compositional analysis of twin-free InGaAs(Sb) axial inserts. (a) HAADF-STEM micrograph recorded in the top region of a transferred NW. (b) High-resolution micrograph magnifying the InGaAs(Sb) region (indicated in (a) by the yellow arrow), with a twin-free ZB domain outlined in yellow. (c) Associated EDXS elemental map of the In distribution, showing an In-rich segment. (d) Vertical com… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: CL measurement of a single InGaAs(Sb) NW-QD transferred on a SiO2/Au/Si substrate. (a) CL intensity map overlaid on the concurrently recorded SE image acquired at 20 K using a 5 kV electron beam and 30 µm beam aperture, showing emission localized at the NW top region corresponding to the InGaAs(Sb) active segment, and (b) The corresponding CL spectrum acquired from the same NW, which exhibits an emission b… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

GaAs-based nanowires hosting active quantum heterostructures provide a promising route toward monolithic integration of single-photon sources on silicon, a key requirement for scalable quantum photonics. However, ultrathin axial quantum-emitter formation is often hindered by facet-dependent growth dynamics and rotational twins, which induce lateral overgrowth and compromise interface abruptness. Here, we develop InGaAs-based quantum emitters by tailoring facet evolution via dilute Sb incorporation, which efficiently suppresses twins and promotes confined axial insertion at the growth-front facet. This approach significantly enhances the probability of obtaining abrupt, few-nanometer-thin quantum dots at the nanowire tip. Single-nanowire optical spectroscopy reveals intense, spatially localized emission from the active region with lifetimes as short as (0.51 $\pm$ 0.02) ns, and second-order photon-correlation measurements consistently exhibit pronounced antibunching with $g^{(2)}(0)<0.4$, confirming single-photon emission. These results establish a strong correlation between twin density and axial heterostructure formation, identifying defect control as a key factor in realizing monolithically integrated nanowire single-photon sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a growth strategy for GaAs-based nanowires incorporating axial InGaAs quantum dots, using dilute Sb incorporation during MBE to engineer facets, suppress rotational twins, and enable abrupt axial heterostructure insertion at the growth front. Single-nanowire optical measurements show spatially localized emission with lifetimes as short as (0.51 ± 0.02) ns and consistent antibunching with g^(2)(0) < 0.4, taken as confirmation of single-photon emission. The central result is a correlation between reduced twin density and successful formation of few-nanometer-thin axial QDs.

Significance. If the reported correlation holds, the work provides a practical route toward monolithic single-photon sources on silicon via nanowire heterostructures, addressing a key integration challenge in quantum photonics. The concrete optical metrics (sub-nanosecond lifetime and g^(2)(0) < 0.4) constitute direct evidence of functional single-photon behavior in these axial emitters, strengthening the case for defect-engineered nanowire platforms.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and facet evolution discussion] Abstract and paragraph on facet evolution and twin density correlation: the claim that dilute Sb incorporation is the dominant factor suppressing twins and enabling abrupt axial InGaAs insertion rests on observed correlations but lacks explicit controls that independently vary other growth parameters (e.g., temperature, V/III ratio, or substrate preparation). Without such controls, it remains difficult to rule out confounding effects and to establish Sb dose as the primary causal variable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract cites specific values for lifetime and g^(2)(0), yet the manuscript does not report the number of nanowires measured, statistical distributions, or raw correlation data; inclusion of these would allow readers to assess the robustness of the single-photon confirmation.
  2. [Growth and characterization sections] Figure captions and growth-section text should explicitly state the Sb flux range used and the corresponding twin-density quantification method (e.g., TEM statistics) to make the facet-engineering mechanism reproducible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for recognizing the significance of our results on axial InGaAs quantum dots in GaAs nanowires. We address the major comment below and have prepared revisions to clarify the experimental design.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and facet evolution discussion] Abstract and paragraph on facet evolution and twin density correlation: the claim that dilute Sb incorporation is the dominant factor suppressing twins and enabling abrupt axial InGaAs insertion rests on observed correlations but lacks explicit controls that independently vary other growth parameters (e.g., temperature, V/III ratio, or substrate preparation). Without such controls, it remains difficult to rule out confounding effects and to establish Sb dose as the primary causal variable.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the reported growth series, substrate temperature, V/III ratio, and substrate preparation were held fixed while only the Sb flux was systematically varied; these fixed parameters are specified in the Methods section. The resulting correlation between Sb dose, twin suppression, and axial QD formation under constant conditions supports our interpretation that dilute Sb incorporation is the dominant factor. We acknowledge that a broader set of independent controls on each parameter would further strengthen the causal claim. In the revised manuscript we will expand the facet-evolution discussion to explicitly restate the fixed parameters, the rationale for the chosen experimental design, and the limitations of the current correlation-based evidence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely experimental report on nanowire growth via MBE, facet evolution under Sb flux, and single-nanowire optical characterization. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictive models appear in the abstract or described sections. Claims rest on direct TEM imaging of twin density, PL spectra, lifetime measurements, and g^(2)(0) antibunching data. These are independent observables, not reductions of one another by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling are indicated in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of nanowire growth dynamics and optical characterization techniques; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond domain-standard crystal growth principles.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Rotational twins in GaAs nanowires induce lateral overgrowth that compromises axial heterostructure abruptness.
    Invoked in the abstract to motivate the need for Sb-mediated facet control.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5779 in / 1290 out tokens · 38287 ms · 2026-05-21T07:49:37.292344+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Moody, G. et al. 2022 Roadmap on Integrated Quantum Photonics. Journal of Physics: Photonics 2022, 4, 012501

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Single site - controlled In(Ga)As/GaAs quantum dots: growth, p roperties and device integration

    Schneider, C.; Huggenberger, A.; Sünner, T.; Heindel, T.; Strauß, M.; Göpfert, S.; Weinmann, P.; Reitzenstein, S.; Worschech, L.; Kamp, M.; Höfling, S.; Forchel, A. Single site - controlled In(Ga)As/GaAs quantum dots: growth, p roperties and device integration. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 434012

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    D.; Atkinson, P.; Müller, M.; Heldmaier, M.; Ulrich, S

    Jöns, K. D.; Atkinson, P.; Müller, M.; Heldmaier, M.; Ulrich, S. M.; Schmidt, O. G.; Michler, P. Triggered Indistinguishable Single Photons with Narrow Line Widths from Site - Controlled Quantum Dots. Nano Letters 2013, 13, 126–130

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    J.; Wilksen, S.; Steinhoff, A.; Baraz, S.; Nitin, N.; Palekar, C

    Gaur, K.; Barua, A.; Tripathi, S.; Roche, L. J.; Wilksen, S.; Steinhoff, A.; Baraz, S.; Nitin, N.; Palekar, C. C.; Koulas -Simos, A.; Limame, I.; Mudi, P.; Rodt, S.; Gies, C.; Reitzenstein, S. Scalable Quant um Photonic Platform Based on Site -Controlled Quantum Dots Coupled to Circular Bragg Grating Resonators. arXiv preprint 2025, arXiv:2512.12300

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    -W.; Hohn, M.; Palekar, C

    Limame, I.; Ludewig, P.; Shih, C. -W.; Hohn, M.; Palekar, C. C.; Stolz, W.; Reitzenstein, S. High -quality sin gle InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot growth on a silicon substrate for quantum photonic applications. Optica Quantum 2024, 2, 117–123

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A.; Thompson, D

    Czaban, J. A.; Thompson, D. A.; LaPierre, R. R. GaAs core -shell nanowires for photovoltaic applications. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 148–154

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    GaAs/AlGaAs core multishell nanowire-based light-emitting diodes on Si

    Tomioka, K.; Motohisa, J.; Hara, S.; Hiruma, K.; Fukui, T. GaAs/AlGaAs core multishell nanowire-based light-emitting diodes on Si. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1639–1644. 29

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    I.; Heiss, M.; Demichel, O.; Holm, J

    Krogstrup, P.; Jørgensen, H. I.; Heiss, M.; Demichel, O.; Holm, J. V.; Aages en, M.; Nygard, J.; Fontcuberta i Morral, A. Single -nanowire solar cells beyond the Shockley –Queisser limit. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 306

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    H.; Jagadish, C

    Saxena, D.; Mokkapati, S.; Parkinson, P.; Jiang, N.; Gao, Q.; Tan, H. H.; Jagadish, C. Optically pumped room-temperature GaAs nanowire lasers. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 963

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Coaxial multishell (In,Ga)As/GaAs nanowires for near-infrared emission on Si substrates

    Dimakis, E.; Jahn, U.; Ramsteiner, M.; Tahraoui, A.; Grandal, J.; Kong, X.; Marquardt, O.; Trampert, A.; Riechert, H.; Geelhaar, L. Coaxial multishell (In,Ga)As/GaAs nanowires for near-infrared emission on Si substrates. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2604

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Loitsch, B.; Winnerl, J.; Grimaldi, G.; Wierzbowski, J.; Rudolph, D.; Morkötter, S.; Döblinger, M.; Abstreiter, G.; Koblmüller, G.; Finley, J. J. Crystal phase quantum dots in the ultrathin core of GaAs–AlGaAs core-shell nanowires. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 7544

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Mayer, B.; Janker, L.; Loitsch, B.; Treu, J.; Kostenbader, T.; Lichtmannecker, S.; Reichert, T.; Morkötter, S.; Kaniber, M.; Abstreiter, G.; Gies, C.; Koblmüller, G.; Finley, J. J. Monolithically integrated high-β nanowire lasers on silicon. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 152

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    K.; Fu, L.; Tan, H

    Wong-Leung, J.; Yang, I.; Li, Z.; Karuturi, S. K.; Fu, L.; Tan, H. H.; Jagadish, C. Engineering III –V semiconductor nanowires for device applications. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1904359

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Koblmüller, G.; Mayer, B.; Stettner, T.; Abstreiter, G.; Finley, J. J. GaAs –AlGaAs core- shell nanowire lasers on silicon: invited review. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2017, 32, 053001. 30

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Stettner, T.; Kostenbader, T.; Ruhstorfer, D.; B issinger, J.; Riedl, H.; Kaniber, M.; Koblmüller, G.; Finley, J. J. Direct coupling of coherent emission from site -selectively grown III–V nanowire lasers into proximal silicon waveguides. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 2537–2543

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Nanowire photonics

    Yan, R.; Gargas, D.; Yang, P. Nanowire photonics. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 569

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    J.; Koblmüller, G

    Mukhundhan, N.; Ajay, A.; Bissinger, J.; Finley, J. J.; Koblmüller, G. Purcell enhanced coupling of nanowire quantum emitters to silicon photonic waveguides. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 43068–43081

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Critical dimensions for the plastic relaxation of strained axial heterostructures in free-standing nanowires

    Glas, F. Critical dimensions for the plastic relaxation of strained axial heterostructures in free-standing nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 121302

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    High -performance semiconductor quantum -dot single-photon sources

    Senellart, P.; Solomon, G.; White, A. High -performance semiconductor quantum -dot single-photon sources. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 1026

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    H.; Jagadish, C.; Wang, Z

    Yu, P.; Li, Z.; Wu, T.; Wang, Y.-T.; Tong, X.; Li, C.-F.; Wang, Z.; Wei, S.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Fu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Tan, H. H.; Jagadish, C.; Wang, Z. M. Nanowire quantum dot surface engineering for high temperature single photon emission. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 13492

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Site - controlled formation of InAs/GaAs quantum -dot-in-nanowires for single photon emitters

    Tatebayashi, J.; Ota, Y.; Ishida, S.; Nishioka, M.; Iwamoto, S.; Arakawa, Y. Site - controlled formation of InAs/GaAs quantum -dot-in-nanowires for single photon emitters. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 263101

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    N.; Foster, A

    Makhonin, M. N.; Foster, A. P.; Krysa, A. B.; Fry, P. W.; Davies, D. G.; Grange, T.; Walther, T.; Skolnick, M. S.; Wilson, L. R. Homogeneous array of nanowire-embedded quantum light emitters. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 861 31

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Room -temperature lasing in a single nanowire with quantum dots

    Tatebayashi, J.; Kako, S.; Ho, J.; Ota, Y.; Iwamoto, S.; Arakawa, Y. Room -temperature lasing in a single nanowire with quantum dots. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 501

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    N.; Lin, A.; Wong, P

    Shapiro, J. N.; Lin, A.; Wong, P. S.; Scofield, A. C.; Tu, C.; Senanayake, P. N.; Mariani , G.; Liang, B. L.; Huffaker, D. L. InGaAs heterostructure formation in catalyst -free GaAs nanopillars by selective -area metal -organic vapor phase epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 243102

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    C.; Meng, X.; Ren, D.; Kim, H.; Senanayake, P.; Hsieh, N

    Farrell, A. C.; Meng, X.; Ren, D.; Kim, H.; Senanayake, P.; Hsieh, N. Y.; Rong, Z.; Chang, T. -Y.; Azizur -Rahman, K. M.; Huffaker, D. L. InGaAs –GaAs nanowire avalanche photodiodes toward single-photon detection in free-running mode. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 582

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Fabrication and characterization of GaAs quantum well buried in AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure nanowires

    Hayashida, A.; Sato, T.; Hara, S.; Motohisa, J.; Hir uma, K.; Fukui, T. Fabrication and characterization of GaAs quantum well buried in AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure nanowires. J. Cryst. Growth 2010, 312, 3592

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Growth and characterization of a GaAs quantum well buried in GaAsP/GaAs vertical heterostructure nanowires by selective -area metal organic vapor phase epitaxy

    Fujisawa, S.; Sato, T.; Hara, S.; Motohisa, J.; Hiruma, K.; Fukui, T. Growth and characterization of a GaAs quantum well buried in GaAsP/GaAs vertical heterostructure nanowires by selective -area metal organic vapor phase epitaxy. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 50, 04DH03

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Fabrication of axial and radial heterostructures for semiconductor nanowires by using selective -area metal -organic vapor -phase epitaxy

    Hiruma, K.; Tomioka, K.; Mohan, P.; Yang, L.; Noborisaka, J.; Hua, B.; Hayashida, A.; Fujisawa, S.; Hara, S.; Motohisa, J.; Fukui, T. Fabrication of axial and radial heterostructures for semiconductor nanowires by using selective -area metal -organic vapor -phase epitaxy. J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 2012, 169284. 32

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    C.; Lin, A.; Haddad, M.; Huffaker, D

    Scofield, A. C.; Lin, A.; Haddad, M.; Huffaker, D. L. Axial diffusion barriers in near - infrared nanopillar LEDs. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6037

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    W.; Ajay, A.; Döblinger, M.; Sturm, S.; Gómez Ruiz, M.; Zell, R.; Mukhundhan, N.; Stelzner, D.; Lähnemann, J.; Müller -Caspary, K.; Finley, J

    Jeong, H. W.; Ajay, A.; Döblinger, M.; Sturm, S.; Gómez Ruiz, M.; Zell, R.; Mukhundhan, N.; Stelzner, D.; Lähnemann, J.; Müller -Caspary, K.; Finley, J. J.; Koblmüller, G. Axial growth characteristics of optically active InGaAs nanowire heterostructures for integrated nanophotonic devices. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 3032–3041

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    W.; Church, S

    Jeong, H. W.; Church, S. A.; Döblinger, M.; Ajay, A.; Haubmann, B.; Patel, N.; Finley, J. J.; Parkinson, P.; Koblmüller, G. High -throughput spectroscopy of geometry -tunable arrays of axial InGaAs nanowire heterostructures with twin-induced carrier confinement. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 14515–14521

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    and Donges, Jan and Shih, Ching-Wen and Gaur, Kartik and Tripathi, Sarthak and Rodt, Sven and Stolz, Wolfgang and Volz, Kerstin and Reitzenstein, Stephan , keywords =

    Limame, I.; Ludewig, P.; Koulas -Simos, A.; Palekar, C. C.; Donges, J.; Shih, C. -W.; Gaur, K.; Tripathi, S.; Rodt, S.; Stolz, W.; Volz, K.; Reitzenstein, S. Direct Epitaxial Growth and Deterministic Device Integration of high -quality Telecom O -Band InGaAs Q uantum Dots on Silicon Substrate. arXiv preprint 2025, arXiv:2512.10073

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Growth characteristics of GaAs nanowires obtained by selective area metal-organic vapour-phase epitaxy

    Ikejiri, K.; Sato, T.; Yoshida, H.; Hiruma, K.; Motohisa, J.; Hara, S.; Fukui, T. Growth characteristics of GaAs nanowires obtained by selective area metal-organic vapour-phase epitaxy. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 265604

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Analysis of twin defects in GaAs nanowires and tetrahedra and their correlation to GaAs(111)B surface reconstructions in selective-area metal organic vapour-phase epitaxy

    Yoshida, H.; Ikejiri, K.; Sato, T.; Hara, S.; Hiruma, K.; Motohisa, J.; Fukui, T. Analysis of twin defects in GaAs nanowires and tetrahedra and their correlation to GaAs(111)B surface reconstructions in selective-area metal organic vapour-phase epitaxy. J. Cryst. Growth 2009, 312, 52. 33

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    -Y.; Cong, S.; Nakano, A.; Dapkus, P

    Yao, M.; Sheng, C.; Ge, M.; Chi, C. -Y.; Cong, S.; Nakano, A.; Dapkus, P. D.; Zhou, C. Facile five -step heteroepitaxial growth of GaAs nanowires on silicon substrates and the t win formation mechanism. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 2424

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    J.; Koblmüller, G

    Ruhstorfer, D.; Döblinger, M.; Riedl, H.; Finley, J. J.; Koblmüller, G. Role of twin defects on growth dynamics and size distribution of undoped and Si -doped GaAs nanowires by selective area epitaxy. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 132, 204302

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    E.; Zell, R.; DeRiseis, J

    Mead, C. E.; Zell, R.; DeRiseis, J. E.; Jeong, H. W.; Schreitmüller, T.; Esmaielpour, H.; Sturm, S.; Chan, M. K. Y.; Müller -Caspary, K.; Koblmüller, G.; Lauhon, L. J. Facet -dependent doping and dopant-dependent faceting in Si-doped GaAsSb nanowires. Cryst. Growth Des. 2026, 26, 96–105

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    W.; Schreitmüller, T.; Döblinger, M.; Ruhstorfer, D.; Mukhundhan, N.; Koolen, P

    Ajay, A.; Jeong, H. W.; Schreitmüller, T.; Döblinger, M.; Ruhstorfer, D.; Mukhundhan, N.; Koolen, P. A. L. M.; Finley, J. J.; Koblmüller, G. Enhanced growth and properties of non - catalytic GaAs nanowires via Sb surfactant effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 121, 072107

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    W.; Ajay, A.; Yu, H.; Döblinger, M.; Mukhundhan, N.; Finley, J

    Jeong, H. W.; Ajay, A.; Yu, H.; Döblinger, M.; Mukhundhan, N.; Finley, J. J.; Koblmüller, G. Sb -mediated tuning of growth - and exciton dynamics in entirely catalyst -free GaAsSb nanowires. Small 2023, 19, 2207531

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    W.; Esmaielpour, H.; Mead, C

    Schreitmüller, T.; Jeong, H. W.; Esmaielpour, H.; Mead, C. E.; Ramsteiner, M.; Schmiedeke, P.; Thurn, A.; Ajay, A.; Matich, S.; Döblinger, M.; Lauhon, L. J.; Finley, J. J.; Koblmüller, G. Large tolerance of lasing properties to impurity defects in GaAs(Sb) -AlGaAs core-shell nanowire lasers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2311210

    work page 2024