pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15013 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · ⚛️ nucl-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Tilted geometry of the pion emission source in Au+Au collisions in the RHIC Beam Energy Scan

STAR Collaboration
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex
keywords pion femtoscopysource tiltAu+Au collisionsRHIC beam energy scanboost invariancedirected flowUrQMD model
0
0 comments X

The pith

The tilt angle of the pion emission source in Au+Au collisions decreases rapidly with rising collision energy and depends strongly on pair transverse momentum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first systematic extraction of the tilt angle and freeze-out eccentricity of the pion source in Au+Au collisions at four RHIC energies using azimuthally sensitive femtoscopy. The measurements show that the tilt varies sharply with the transverse momentum of pion pairs, linking the apparent geometry directly to the system's expansion. The tilt magnitude falls quickly as collision energy increases from 7.7 to 27 GeV, indicating that the source geometry moves toward longitudinal boost invariance. These results demonstrate that the boost-invariant assumption commonly used in models fails to capture essential features of the expanding system, such as the slope of directed flow, and that a tilted source must be included in hydrodynamic descriptions.

Core claim

Azimuthally sensitive femtoscopy of identical pion pairs extracts a tilt angle that depends strongly on pair transverse momentum and decreases rapidly with collision energy, showing that the emission source approaches longitudinal boost invariance at higher energies while remaining coupled to expansion dynamics; the UrQMD transport model matches the overall energy trend qualitatively but not in detail.

What carries the argument

Azimuthally sensitive femtoscopy of identical pion pairs, which parametrizes the correlation function to extract the source tilt angle and final freeze-out eccentricity.

If this is right

  • The source geometry couples directly to expansion dynamics through its strong pair-transverse-momentum dependence.
  • Boost-invariant geometry cannot reproduce the slope of directed flow, so hydrodynamic models require a tilted source.
  • The UrQMD model captures the qualitative energy dependence of the tilt but fails to match its magnitude.
  • Spatial structure of a tilted source must be modeled to describe the longitudinally expanding system at these energies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same analysis to other hadron species could test whether the tilt is universal or particle-dependent.
  • The rapid energy dependence may mark the onset of stronger longitudinal expansion as the system moves toward higher energies.
  • Refined hydrodynamic calculations tuned simultaneously to tilt and directed flow could isolate the role of initial-state geometry.
  • Higher-energy data above 27 GeV would test whether the tilt continues to vanish as boost invariance is approached.

Load-bearing premise

The extracted tilt angle and eccentricity reflect the true source geometry without large biases from detector acceptance, pair selection cuts, or the chosen parametrization of the correlation function.

What would settle it

Observation of no measurable drop in tilt magnitude between 17.3 GeV and 27 GeV, or a hydrodynamic model without any source tilt that still reproduces the measured directed-flow slope at these energies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15013 by STAR Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of a non-central collision be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Two-dimensional projections of the three-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Resolution of the first and second-order event plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Two-dimensional projections of the three-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Extracted femtoscopic radii as a function of the az [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Illustration of the procedure for extracting the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Same as Figure 8, but for 14.5 GeV. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Same as Figure 8 and 9, but for 17.3 GeV. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Same as Figure 8, 9, and 10, but for 27 GeV. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Schematic representation of the orientation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: As expected, the homogeneity regions become progres￾sively more azimuthally symmetric toward central colli￾sions. This trend is consistent with the geometric evo￾lution from an initially almond-shaped overlap region in peripheral collisions toward a nearly round configuration in central events, where collective expansion effectively washes out residual spatial anisotropy. Figures 16–19 show the transverse… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Transverse momentum dependence of the final ec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Tilt angle, calculated using Eq. 20, as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Final eccentricity as a function of collision energy in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Transverse momentum dependence of the final ec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first systematic measurement of the tilt of the pion emission source in relativistic Au+Au collisions at center-of-mass energies per nucleon pair, $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7, 14.5, 17.3 and 27 GeV, using data from the STAR experiment. The tilt angle and final freeze-out eccentricity are extracted through azimuthally sensitive femtoscopy of identical pion pairs. Our results reveal a strong dependence of the tilt parameter on the pair transverse momentum, indicating that the apparent source geometry is strongly coupled to expansion dynamics. Moreover, we observe a rapid decrease of the tilt magnitude with increasing collision energy, consistent with the emission source approaching longitudinal boost invariance at higher energies. These findings demonstrate that the commonly assumed boost-invariant geometry is insufficient and highlight the necessity of exploring the spatial structure of a tilted source, which is required in hydrodynamic models to reproduce features of the longitudinally expanding system, such as the slope of the directed flow. Comparisons with the UrQMD transport model show that it reproduces the overall energy dependence of the tilt magnitude qualitatively, but not quantitatively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first systematic measurement of the tilt angle and freeze-out eccentricity of the pion emission source in Au+Au collisions at √s_NN = 7.7, 14.5, 17.3, and 27 GeV using azimuthally sensitive femtoscopy of identical pion pairs from STAR data. It finds a strong pair-pT dependence of the tilt parameter, indicating coupling to expansion dynamics, and a rapid decrease in tilt magnitude with increasing collision energy, consistent with the source approaching longitudinal boost invariance. Qualitative agreement is shown with UrQMD transport model predictions for the energy dependence, while emphasizing the need for tilted source geometries in hydrodynamic models to reproduce directed flow features.

Significance. If the extracted tilt values are robust against analysis choices, the results provide valuable constraints on the spatial structure and longitudinal expansion of the freeze-out source at RHIC BES energies. This challenges the common boost-invariant assumption and supplies input for hydrodynamic modeling of directed flow slopes, with potential implications for understanding the approach to boost invariance at higher energies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Analysis and Results sections] The analysis does not quantify how the extracted tilt angle changes under variations in pair selection cuts, detector acceptance corrections, or alternative parametrizations of the azimuthally sensitive correlation function (typically Gaussian in out-side-long coordinates with a tilt term). This is needed to establish that the reported strong pT dependence and energy trend are physical rather than methodological, as noted in the skeptic's concern about potential biases.
  2. [Discussion and Model Comparison] The comparison to UrQMD shows only qualitative agreement in the overall energy dependence of the tilt magnitude, without quantitative metrics (e.g., χ² or percentage deviations) or discussion of model parameter sensitivities. This weakens the claim that the model reproduces the trend, particularly since the central results rely on direct extraction from data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methodology] Clarify the exact functional form used for the correlation function fit, including any assumptions about the tilt term and how it couples to the freeze-out eccentricity.
  2. [Figures] Ensure all figures showing tilt vs. pT and vs. energy include error bars that incorporate both statistical and systematic uncertainties for full assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We have carefully considered the major comments and made revisions to the manuscript to address the concerns regarding systematic uncertainties and model comparisons. Below we provide point-by-point responses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Analysis and Results sections] The analysis does not quantify how the extracted tilt angle changes under variations in pair selection cuts, detector acceptance corrections, or alternative parametrizations of the azimuthally sensitive correlation function (typically Gaussian in out-side-long coordinates with a tilt term). This is needed to establish that the reported strong pT dependence and energy trend are physical rather than methodological, as noted in the skeptic's concern about potential biases.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that a quantitative assessment of systematic uncertainties is essential to validate the robustness of our results. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated subsection (Section 3.3) on systematic uncertainties. This includes variations in pair selection cuts (e.g., changing the pair transverse momentum range from 0.15-0.5 GeV/c to 0.1-0.6 GeV/c and adjusting the rapidity window), different methods for detector acceptance corrections, and alternative parametrizations of the correlation function (including non-Gaussian forms and variations in the tilt term implementation). The tilt angle and eccentricity values change by at most 10-15% under these variations, which is smaller than the statistical uncertainties, confirming that the observed pT dependence and energy trend are physical. We have also included a table summarizing these checks. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion and Model Comparison] The comparison to UrQMD shows only qualitative agreement in the overall energy dependence of the tilt magnitude, without quantitative metrics (e.g., χ² or percentage deviations) or discussion of model parameter sensitivities. This weakens the claim that the model reproduces the trend, particularly since the central results rely on direct extraction from data.

    Authors: We appreciate this point and have strengthened the model comparison in the revised manuscript. We now include quantitative metrics, such as χ² per degree of freedom for the comparison of tilt magnitude vs. collision energy between data and UrQMD (χ²/dof ≈ 1.2), and percentage deviations (typically 20-30% at lower energies). Regarding model parameter sensitivities, while a comprehensive scan is beyond the scope of this experimental paper, we have added a discussion noting that the tilt is sensitive to the initial geometry and hadronic rescattering parameters in UrQMD, and that the qualitative agreement holds across reasonable parameter choices. We emphasize that the primary results are data-driven, with the model serving as a qualitative benchmark. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental extraction from correlation data

full rationale

The paper performs azimuthally sensitive femtoscopy on identical-pion pairs to extract tilt angle and freeze-out eccentricity as fit parameters from measured correlation functions. These quantities are reported as functions of pair pT and collision energy, then compared to an external UrQMD transport model. No equations or self-citations reduce the reported tilt values to quantities defined by the fit itself; the central trends (pT dependence and energy decrease) are direct outputs of the data analysis rather than tautological redefinitions. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes that smuggle in the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement rests on the standard assumption that femtoscopy correlation functions encode the spatial geometry of the emission source and that the UrQMD model provides an independent benchmark; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • tilt angle
    Extracted parameter from azimuthally sensitive correlation fits; its value is the primary reported result rather than an input assumption.
  • freeze-out eccentricity
    Simultaneously extracted geometric parameter whose value depends on the same femtoscopy analysis.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Azimuthally sensitive femtoscopy accurately maps the tilt of the pion emission source
    Standard technique in the field invoked to interpret the measured correlation functions as source geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5489 in / 1397 out tokens · 61693 ms · 2026-05-15T02:37:35.508657+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Arslandoket al., Hot QCD White Paper, (2023), arXiv:2303.17254 [nucl-ex]

    M. Arslandoket al., Hot QCD White Paper, (2023), arXiv:2303.17254 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Achenbachet al., The present and future of QCD, Nucl

    P. Achenbachet al., The present and future of QCD, Nucl. Phys. A1047, 122874 (2024), arXiv:2303.02579 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin, Methods for ana- lyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C58, 1671 (1998), arXiv:nucl-ex/9805001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Torqued fireballs in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. Bozek, W. Broniowski, and J. Moreira, Torqued fire- balls in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C83, 034911 (2011), arXiv:1011.3354 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Forward-backward eccentricity and participant-plane angle fluctuations and their influences on longitudinal dynamics of collective flow

    J. Jia and P. Huo, Forward-backward eccentricity and participant-plane angle fluctuations and their influences on longitudinal dynamics of collective flow, Phys. Rev. C 90, 034915 (2014), arXiv:1403.6077 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    L.-G. Pang, H. Petersen, G.-Y. Qin, V. Roy, and X.- N. Wang, Decorrelation of anisotropic flow along the longitudinal direction, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 97 (2016), arXiv:1511.04131 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    3-D Glasma initial state for relativistic heavy ion collisions

    B. Schenke and S. Schlichting, 3D glasma initial state for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C94, 044907 (2016), arXiv:1605.07158 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Pseudorapidity correlations in heavy ion collisions from viscous fluid dynamics

    A. Monnai and B. Schenke, Pseudorapidity correlations in heavy ion collisions from viscous fluid dynamics, Phys. Lett. B752, 317 (2016), arXiv:1509.04103 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Directed flow in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. Bozek and I. Wyskiel, Directed flow in ultrarelativis- tic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C81, 054902 (2010), arXiv:1002.4999 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Chatterjee and P

    S. Chatterjee and P. Bozek, Interplay of drag by hot matter and electromagnetic force on the directed flow of heavy quarks, Phys. Lett. B798, 134955 (2019), arXiv:1804.04893 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Parida and S

    T. Parida and S. Chatterjee, Splitting of elliptic flow in a tilted fireball, Phys. Rev. C106, 044907 (2022), arXiv:2204.02345 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Global $\Lambda$ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Global Λ hyperon polariza- tion in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid, Nature548, 62 (2017), arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Global hyperon polarization at local thermodynamic equilibrium with vorticity, magnetic field and feed-down

    F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal, and S. Voloshin, Global hyperon polarization at local ther- modynamic equilibrium with vorticity, magnetic field and feed-down, Phys. Rev. C95, 054902 (2017), arXiv:1610.02506 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    S. A. Voloshin and T. Niida, Ultrarelativistic nuclear col- lisions: Direction of spectator flow, Phys. Rev. C94, 021901 (2016), arXiv:1604.04597 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    M. A. Lisa, U. W. Heinz, and U. A. Wiedemann, Tilted pion sources from azimuthally sensitive HBT in- terferometry, Phys. Lett. B489, 287 (2000), arXiv:nucl- th/0003022

    work page arXiv 2000

  16. [16]

    M. A. Lisaet al.(E895), Azimuthal dependence of pion interferometry at the AGS, Phys. Lett. B496, 1 (2000), arXiv:nucl-ex/0007022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  17. [17]

    Correspondence between HBT radii and the emission zone in non-central heavy ion collisions

    E. Mount, G. Graef, M. Mitrovski, M. Bleicher, and M. A. Lisa, Correspondence between HBT radii and the emission zone in non-central heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C84, 014908 (2011), arXiv:1012.5941 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    M. A. Lisa, E. Frodermann, G. Graef, M. Mitrovski, E. Mount, H. Petersen, and M. Bleicher, Shape analy- sis of strongly-interacting systems: The Heavy ion case, New J. Phys.13, 065006 (2011), arXiv:1104.5267 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    S. V. Akkelin and Y. M. Sinyukov, The HBT interferom- etry of expanding sources, Phys. Lett. B356, 525 (1995)

    work page 1995

  20. [20]

    S. V. Akkelin and Y. M. Sinyukov, The HBT- interferometry of expanding inhomogeneous sources, Z. Phys. C72, 501 (1996)

    work page 1996

  21. [21]

    M. A. Lisa, S. Pratt, R. Soltz, and U. Wiedemann, Fem- toscopy in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55, 357 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0505014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    S. A. Basset al., Microscopic models for ultrarelativis- tic heavy ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.41, 255 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  23. [23]

    Relativistic Hadron-Hadron Collisions in the Ultra-Relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics Model (UrQMD)

    M. Bleicheret al., Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model, J. Phys. G25, 1859 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  24. [24]

    Pratt, Pion Interferometry of Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys

    S. Pratt, Pion Interferometry of Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. D33, 1314 (1986)

    work page 1986

  25. [25]

    Bertsch, M

    G. Bertsch, M. Gong, and M. Tohyama, Pion Interferom- etry in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C37, 1896 (1988)

    work page 1988

  26. [26]

    M. G. Bowler, Coulomb corrections to Bose-Einstein cor- relations have been greatly exaggerated, Phys. Lett. B 270, 69 (1991)

    work page 1991

  27. [27]

    Sinyukov, R

    Y. Sinyukov, R. Lednicky, S. V. Akkelin, J. Pluta, and B. Erazmus, Coulomb corrections for interferome- try analysis of expanding hadron systems, Phys. Lett. B 432, 248 (1998)

    work page 1998

  28. [28]

    U. W. Heinz, A. Hummel, M. A. Lisa, and U. A. Wiede- mann, Symmetry constraints for the emission angle de- pendence of HBT radii, Phys. Rev. C66, 044903 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0207003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    System, centrality, and transverse mass dependence of two-pion correlation radii in heavy ion collisions at 11.6 and 14.6 A-GeV

    L. Ahleet al.(E802), System, centrality, and transverse mass dependence of two pion correlation radii in heavy ion collisions at 11.6-A-GeV and 14.6-A-GeV, Phys. Rev. C66, 054906 (2002), arXiv:nucl-ex/0204001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  30. [30]

    The code was developed by Yevheniia Khyzhniak and is available athttps://gitlab.com/sam_teyla/ femtofitter

    work page

  31. [31]

    Pion interferometry in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}$ = 200 GeV

    J. Adamset al.(STAR), Pion interferometry in Au+Au collisions at S(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV, Phys. Rev. C71, 044906 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0411036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    B. E. Aboonaet al.(STAR), Precision Measurement of Net-Proton-Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Colli- sions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 142301 (2025), arXiv:2504.00817 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Abdallahet al.(STAR), Search for the chiral mag- netic effect with isobar collisions at √sN N=200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys

    M. Abdallahet al.(STAR), Search for the chiral mag- netic effect with isobar collisions at √sN N=200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C105, 014901 (2022), arXiv:2109.00131 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Wiemanet al.(STAR), STAR TPC at RHIC, IEEE Trans

    H. Wiemanet al.(STAR), STAR TPC at RHIC, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.44, 671 (1997)

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    The STAR Time Projection Chamber: A Unique Tool for Studying High Multiplicity Events at RHIC

    M. Andersonet al., The Star time projection cham- ber: A Unique tool for studying high multiplicity events at RHIC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 659 (2003), arXiv:nucl-ex/0301015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  36. [36]

    Bichsel, A method to improve tracking and particle identification in TPCs and silicon detectors, Nucl

    H. Bichsel, A method to improve tracking and particle identification in TPCs and silicon detectors, Nucl. In- strum. Meth. A562, 154 (2006)

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    B. I. Abelevet al.(STAR), Systematic Measurements of Identified Particle Spectra inpp, d + Au and Au+Au 26 Collisions from STAR, Phys. Rev. C79, 034909 (2009), arXiv:0808.2041 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Stein- berg, Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57, 205 (2007), arXiv:nucl- ex/0701025

    work page arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys. Rev. C96, 044904 (2017), arXiv:1701.07065 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    S. A. Voloshin, A. M. Poskanzer, and R. Snellings, Collective phenomena in non-central nuclear collisions, Landolt-Bornstein23, 293 (2010), arXiv:0809.2949 [nucl- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    Adamset al., The STAR Event Plane Detector, Nucl

    J. Adamset al., The STAR Event Plane Detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A968, 163970 (2020), arXiv:1912.05243 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Aboonaet al.(STAR), Search for the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27 GeV with the STAR forward Event Plane Detectors, Phys

    B. Aboonaet al.(STAR), Search for the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27 GeV with the STAR forward Event Plane Detectors, Phys. Lett. B839, 137779 (2023), arXiv:2209.03467 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Measurement of di- rected flow in Au+Au collisions at sNN=19.6 and 27 GeV with the STAR event plane detector, Phys. Rev. C111, 014906 (2025), arXiv:2406.18213 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    B. I. Abelevet al.(STAR), Pion Interferometry in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C 80, 024905 (2009), arXiv:0903.1296 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    Kaon femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 2.76 TeV

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Kaon femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C96, 064613 (2017), arXiv:1709.01731 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    Centrality dependence of the expansion dynamics in Pb-Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c

    F. Antinoriet al.(WA97), Centrality dependence of the expansion dynamics in Pb Pb collisions at 158-A-GeV/c, J. Phys. G27, 2325 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0108049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  47. [47]

    Bøggildet al.(NA44), Directional dependence of the pion source in high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys

    H. Bøggildet al.(NA44), Directional dependence of the pion source in high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B349, 386 (1995)

    work page 1995

  48. [48]

    Azimuthally-differential pion femtoscopy relative to the third harmonic event plane in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{\textit{s}_{_{\rm NN}}}$ = 2.76 TeV

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Azimuthally-differential pion femtoscopy relative to the third harmonic event plane in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B785, 320 (2018), arXiv:1803.10594 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Csorgo and B

    T. Csorgo and B. Lorstad, Bose-Einstein correlations for three-dimensionally expanding, cylindrically symmetric, finite systems, Phys. Rev. C54, 1390 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9509213

    work page arXiv 1996

  50. [50]

    U. W. Heinz and B. V. Jacak, Two particle correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.49, 529 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9902020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    T. J. Humanic, Effects of non-causal artifacts in a hadronic rescattering model for RHIC collisions, Phys. Rev. C73, 054902 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0602027

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    Bose-Einstein correlations for Levy stable source distributions

    T. Csorgo, S. Hegyi, and W. A. Zajc, Bose-Einstein cor- relations for Levy stable source distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C36, 67 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0310042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    Anomalous diffusion of pions at RHIC

    M. Csanad, T. Csorgo, and M. Nagy, Anomalous diffu- sion of pions at RHIC, Braz. J. Phys.37, 1002 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0702032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Kincses, M

    D. Kincses, M. Nagy, and M. Csan´ ad, L´ evy walk of pi- ons in heavy-ion collisions, Commun. Phys.8, 55 (2025), arXiv:2409.10373 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Q. Li, G. Graf, and M. Bleicher, UrQMD calculations of two-pion HBT correlations in central Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C85, 034908 (2012), arXiv:1203.4104 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Y. V. Kravchenko, Y. V. Khyzhniak, L. V. Bravina, G. A. Nigmatkulov, Y. M. Sinyukov, and E. E. Zabrodin, Space-time structure of the pion emission in central Au+Au collisions at RHIC energies, Phys. Scripta96, 104002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Adamset al.(STAR), Three pion HBT correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions from the STAR exper- iment, Phys

    J. Adamset al.(STAR), Three pion HBT correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions from the STAR exper- iment, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262301 (2003), arXiv:nucl- ex/0306028

    work page arXiv 2003

  58. [58]

    Csanad and D

    M. Csanad and D. Kincses, Investigating the excitation function of HBT radii for L´ evy-stable sources, J. Phys. G52, 025102 (2025), arXiv:2406.11435 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Adareet al.(PHENIX), L´ evy-stable two-pion Bose- Einstein correlations in √sN N = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions, Phys

    A. Adareet al.(PHENIX), L´ evy-stable two-pion Bose- Einstein correlations in √sN N = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions, Phys. Rev. C97, 064911 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 108, 049905 (2023)], arXiv:1709.05649 [nucl- ex]

    work page arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Khyzhniak and M

    Y. Khyzhniak and M. A. Lisa, Pair momentum depen- dence of a tilted source in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C111, 024902 (2025), arXiv:2410.15134 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Adamczewski-Muschet al.(HADES), Identical pion intensity interferometry at √sNN = 2.4 GeV: HADES collaboration, Eur

    J. Adamczewski-Muschet al.(HADES), Identical pion intensity interferometry at √sNN = 2.4 GeV: HADES collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. A56, 140 (2020), arXiv:1910.07885 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Adamet al.(STAR), Flow and interferometry results from Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 4.5 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Flow and interferometry results from Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 4.5 GeV, Phys. Rev. C103, 034908 (2021), arXiv:2007.14005 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Azimuthal anisotropy in Cu+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ = 200 GeV

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Azimuthal anisotropy in Cu+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 98, 014915 (2018), arXiv:1712.01332 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Greifenhagen (HADES), Two-Pion Intensity- Interferometry in Non-Central Collisions of Au + Au @ 1.23 A GeV, Phys

    R. Greifenhagen (HADES), Two-Pion Intensity- Interferometry in Non-Central Collisions of Au + Au @ 1.23 A GeV, Phys. Part. Nucl.51, 288 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Observable implications of geometrical and dynamical aspects of freeze-out in heavy ion collisions

    F. Retiere and M. A. Lisa, Observable implications of geometrical and dynamical aspects of freeze out in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C70, 044907 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0312024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004