pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15076 · v1 · pith:5NQXOFFZnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-lat· nucl-th

Deforming the Trail: Baseline Quantum Circuitry for SU(2)_k Lattice Gauge Theory

Zo\"e Webb-Mack , Natalie Klco This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 20:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-latnucl-th
keywords lattice gauge theoryquantum simulationSU(2)_kq-deformationquantum circuitsplaquette operatorresource estimationYang-Mills theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

q-deformation of SU(2) lattice gauge theory reduces generalized-controlled-X gate counts from O(d^8) to O(d^5) while preserving physical Hilbert-space scaling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to deform SU(2) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory with quantum groups so that finite-dimensional truncations restore the unitarity of the plaquette operator. Gauge-variant completions extend this unitarity across the full computational space, producing explicit time-evolution unitaries. Basic decompositions and operator symmetries then yield concrete upper bounds on two-qudit gates that improve the polynomial scaling by three powers. The deformed theory keeps the same d-dependence for the dimension of physical states, only rescaled by a constant factor near one quarter.

Core claim

For the SU(2)_k Yang-Mills pure-gauge theory, a constructive strategy of gauge-variant completions extends the physical unitarity of the plaquette operator to the entire computational Hilbert space, leading to well-defined time-evolution unitaries. Leveraging basic circuit decompositions and symmetries of the diagonalized plaquette operator yields resource upper bounds on generalized-controlled-X two-qudit gates that scale as O(d^5) rather than O(d^8). The stronger q-deformed gauge constraint produces a physical Hilbert-space dimension that scales identically with truncation level d but multiplied by the constant factor 0.2563(5).

What carries the argument

The q-deformed plaquette operator obtained by recontracting vertex pairs, completed by gauge-variant operators that enforce unitarity on the full space.

If this is right

  • Time-evolution operators for the deformed theory become concrete targets for further circuit optimization on quantum hardware.
  • The same deformation strategy can be applied at every vertex and plaquette without changing the leading d-scaling of the physical subspace.
  • Flux configurations exhibit an inversion symmetry under the deformation, altering interaction strengths at all length scales.
  • Resource estimates for simulating pure SU(2) gauge theory on quantum computers improve by three powers of the truncation parameter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reduced gate scaling may allow simulations of larger lattices or higher representations before hardware limits are reached.
  • The constant factor in the physical-state count offers a direct numerical benchmark for comparing deformed and undeformed truncations in other gauge groups.
  • Because the deformation softens the gauge constraint at vertices, extensions to dynamical matter fields could be tested by checking whether the same unitarity restoration still holds.

Load-bearing premise

The q-deformed gauge constraint together with the gauge-variant completions truly extend physical unitarity to every state in the computational space while still giving a reliable truncation of the original theory.

What would settle it

An explicit circuit implementation for d greater than 5 whose two-qudit gate count exceeds the stated O(d^5) upper bound, or a direct count of physical states whose ratio to the non-deformed count deviates from 0.2563(5) by more than a few percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15076 by Natalie Klco, Zo\"e Webb-Mack.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. An F move takes an original two-vertex diagram (with vertices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Size of q-deformed physical subspace (satisfying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Circuit capable of implementing plaquette oper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Explicit upperbounds to the number of GCX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. An alternative circuit capable of implementing the phased F-moves at qubit truncation. By computing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The controlled G-move can be decomposed into uncontrolled single-qudit operators if the transformed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Decomposition of a single-qudit unitary controlled on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. A controlled unitary can be decomposed into two diagonalizing gates and a controlled diagonal operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantifying quantum resources for simulating the fundamental forces of Nature is sensitive to the mapping of gauge fields onto finite quantum computational architectures. When locally truncating lattice gauge theories in the irreducible representation basis, it has been proposed to further deform the theory via quantum groups. The purpose of this deformation is (1) to provide an infinite tower of finite-dimensional ($d = k+1$) groups systematically approximating the infinite-dimensional gauge links and (2) to restore the physical unitarity of a plaquette operator diagonalization procedure analytically derived from the field continuum by recontracting vertex pairs. For the SU(2)$_k$ Yang-Mills pure-gauge theory, we provide a constructive strategy of gauge-variant completions to extend this unitarity to the entire computational Hilbert space, leading to well-defined time evolution unitaries as targets for optimized circuit synthesis. Leveraging basic circuit decompositions and symmetries of the diagonalized plaquette operator, we report resource upper-bounds on the generalized-controlled-X two-qudit gates for arbitrary local truncation $d$, reducing estimates and scaling relative to the non-deformed theory by three polynomial powers from $O(d^8)$ to $O(d^5)$. Examining the stronger q-deformed gauge constraint, which softens the total flux at vertices, we show that the physical Hilbert space dimension of the deformed plaquette operator scales equivalently to its non-deformed counterpart with a constant factor $0.2563(5)$. Thus, despite affecting interactions at all scales as exemplified by the observed flux hierarchy inversion symmetry, q-deformation continues to pass scrutiny as a reliable truncation offering advantages in quantum circuit synthesis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a q-deformation of SU(2)_k pure-gauge lattice theory via quantum groups. It supplies an explicit constructive strategy for gauge-variant completions that extend physical unitarity from the deformed plaquette operator to the full computational Hilbert space. Leveraging symmetries of the diagonalized plaquette operator and basic circuit decompositions, the work derives resource upper bounds on generalized-controlled-X two-qudit gates that scale as O(d^5) for arbitrary truncation dimension d (improving on the O(d^8) scaling of the undeformed theory). It further reports that the physical Hilbert-space dimension of the deformed plaquette operator scales identically to the undeformed case up to a constant prefactor 0.2563(5).

Significance. If the constructions and bounds hold, the paper supplies a concrete route to polynomial resource reduction in quantum circuit synthesis for lattice gauge theories while preserving truncation reliability. The explicit gauge-variant completion strategy and the symmetry-based gate-count arguments constitute verifiable strengths that directly support the claimed advantages over non-deformed formulations.

minor comments (1)
  1. The numerical evaluation yielding the prefactor 0.2563(5) would benefit from an explicit statement of the range of d values sampled and the precise counting procedure used to obtain the physical subspace dimension.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately reflects the core contributions regarding the q-deformation of SU(2)_k lattice gauge theory, the gauge-variant completion strategy, the O(d^5) resource bounds, and the Hilbert-space scaling analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation chain consists of explicit constructive strategies for gauge-variant completions to extend unitarity under the q-deformed constraint, symmetry-based circuit decompositions yielding the O(d^5) gate bound, and direct numerical evaluation of the physical Hilbert-space dimension scaling factor 0.2563(5). None of these steps reduce by definition or construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes imported from the same authors; all are presented as independent outputs from the stated mappings and decompositions. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters or invented entities; the deformation relies on standard properties of quantum groups SU(2)_k.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum group deformation provides finite-dimensional (d = k+1) irreducible representations that systematically approximate infinite-dimensional gauge links.
    Invoked to justify the truncation and unitarity restoration procedure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5835 in / 1327 out tokens · 31597 ms · 2026-06-30T20:09:14.426177+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SU(2) gauge theory with fermions on a semi-simple cubic lattice

    hep-lat 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces the semi-simple cubic (ssc) lattice for 3D SU(2) gauge theory with staggered fermions, reducing qubit count and streamlining Gauss's law for quantum hardware.

  2. Photonic Analog Quantum Simulation of (1+1)-Dimensional $U(1)$ Lattice Gauge Theory with Dynamical Matter

    hep-lat 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A mapping of the Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard model onto the spin-1/2 Quantum Link Model via tuned polaritonic resonances in cavity arrays enables analog simulation of U(1) LGT dynamics with matter, verified by exact diago...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Davoudi, I

    Z. Davoudi, I. Raychowdhury, and A. Shaw, Search for efficient formulations for Hamiltonian simulation of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074505 (2021), arXiv:2009.11802 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    M. C. Ba˜ nulset al., Simulating Lattice Gauge The- ories within Quantum Technologies, Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 165 (2020), arXiv:1911.00003 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Aidelsburgeret al., Cold atoms meet lat- tice gauge theory, Phil

    M. Aidelsburgeret al., Cold atoms meet lat- tice gauge theory, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A380, 20210064 (2021), arXiv:2106.03063 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    N. Klco, A. Roggero, and M. J. Savage, Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface, Rept. Prog. Phys.85, 064301 (2022), arXiv:2107.04769 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    C. W. Baueret al., Quantum Simulation for High- Energy Physics, PRX Quantum4, 027001 (2023), arXiv:2204.03381 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Quantum simulation of fundamental parti- cles and forces, Nature Rev. Phys.5, 420 (2023), arXiv:2404.06298 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    A Formulation of Lattice Gauge Theories for Quantum Simulations

    E. Zohar and M. Burrello, Formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. D91, 054506 (2015), arXiv:1409.3085 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Raychowdhury and J

    I. Raychowdhury and J. R. Stryker, Loop, string, and hadron dynamics in SU(2) Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D101, 114502 (2020), arXiv:1912.06133 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Kreshchuk, W

    M. Kreshchuk, W. M. Kirby, G. Goldstein, H. Beau- chemin, and P. J. Love, Quantum simulation of quantum field theory in the light-front formulation, Phys. Rev. A105, 032418 (2022), arXiv:2002.04016 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Wiese, From quantum link models to D-theory: a resource efficient framework for the quantum sim- ulation and computation of gauge theories, Phil

    U.-J. Wiese, From quantum link models to D-theory: a resource efficient framework for the quantum sim- ulation and computation of gauge theories, Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.380, 20210068 (2021), arXiv:2107.09335 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Alexandru, P

    A. Alexandru, P. F. Bedaque, R. Brett, and H. Lamm, Spectrum of digitized QCD: Glueballs in a S(1080) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D105, 114508 (2022), arXiv:2112.08482 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Y. Ji, H. Lamm, and S. Zhu, Gluon Field Dig- itization via Group Space Decimation for Quan- tum Computers, Phys. Rev. D102, 114513 (2020), arXiv:2005.14221 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T

    D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T. V. Zache, J. Carrasco, B. Kraus, and P. Zoller, Hardware Efficient Quan- tum Simulation of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories with Qudits on Rydberg Platforms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 160501 (2022), arXiv:2203.15541 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer

    T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto, Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A73, 022328 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0510027

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    Ciavarella, N

    A. Ciavarella, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis, Phys. Rev. D103, 094501 (2021), arXiv:2101.10227 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    N. Klco, J. R. Stryker, and M. J. Savage, SU(2) non- Abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on dig- ital quantum computers, Phys. Rev. D101, 074512 (2020), arXiv:1908.06935 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    A cold-atom quantum simulator for SU(2) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Cold-Atom Quantum Simulator for SU(2) Yang-Mills Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 125304 (2013), arXiv:1211.2241 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Atomic Quantum Simulation of U(N) and SU(N) Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories

    D. Banerjee, M. B¨ ogli, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Ste- bler, U. J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic Quantum Simulation of U(N) and SU(N) Non-Abelian Lat- tice Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 125303 (2013), arXiv:1211.2242 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: local gauge invariance from angular momentum conservation

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: local gauge invariance from angular momentum conservation, Phys. Rev. A88, 023617 (2013), arXiv:1303.5040 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Quantum Simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories using Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum Sim- ulations of Lattice Gauge Theories using Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, Rept. Prog. Phys.79, 014401 (2016), arXiv:1503.02312 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Eliminating fermionic matter fields in lattice gauge theories

    E. Zohar and J. I. Cirac, Eliminating fermionic mat- ter fields in lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B98, 075119 (2018), arXiv:1805.05347 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Kasper, G

    V. Kasper, G. Juzeliunas, M. Lewenstein, F. Jendrzejewski, and E. Zohar, From the Jaynes–Cummings model to non-abelian gauge theories: a guided tour for the quantum engineer, New J. Phys.22, 103027 (2020), arXiv:2006.01258 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    A. J. Buser, H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, M. Honda, and J. Liu, Quantum simulation of gauge theory 14 via orbifold lattice, JHEP09, 034, arXiv:2011.06576 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    C. W. Bauer, M. Freytsis, and B. Nachman, Simu- lating Collider Physics on Quantum Computers Us- ing Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 212001 (2021), arXiv:2102.05044 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    C. W. Bauer and D. M. Grabowska, Efficient representation for simulating U(1) gauge theories on digital quantum computers at all values of the coupling, Phys. Rev. D107, L031503 (2023), arXiv:2111.08015 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Kan and Y

    A. Kan and Y. Nam, Lattice Quantum Chromody- namics and Electrodynamics on a Universal Quan- tum Computer (2021), arXiv:2107.12769 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    J. F. Haase, L. Dellantonio, A. Celi, D. Paulson, A. Kan, K. Jansen, and C. A. Muschik, A resource efficient approach for quantum and classical simula- tions of gauge theories in particle physics, Quantum 5, 393 (2021), arXiv:2006.14160 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    S. V. Kadam, I. Raychowdhury, and J. R. Stryker, Loop-string-hadron formulation of an SU(3) gauge theory with dynamical quarks, Phys. Rev. D107, 094513 (2023), arXiv:2212.04490 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Davoudi, A

    Z. Davoudi, A. F. Shaw, and J. R. Stryker, Gen- eral quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simula- tion with applications to a non-Abelian lattice gauge theory, Quantum7, 1213 (2023), arXiv:2212.14030 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Pardo, T

    G. Pardo, T. Greenberg, A. Fortinsky, N. Katz, and E. Zohar, Resource-efficient quantum simula- tion of lattice gauge theories in arbitrary dimensions: Solving for Gauss’s law and fermion elimination, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023077 (2023), arXiv:2206.00685 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    H. Liu, T. Bhattacharya, S. Chandrasekharan, and R. Gupta, Phases of 2D massless QCD with qubit regularization, Phys. Rev. D111, 094511 (2025), arXiv:2312.17734 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    A. N. Ciavarella, Quantum simulation of lattice QCD with improved Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094513 (2023), arXiv:2307.05593 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    D’Andrea, C

    I. D’Andrea, C. W. Bauer, D. M. Grabowska, and M. Freytsis, New basis for Hamiltonian SU(2) simulations, Phys. Rev. D109, 074501 (2024), arXiv:2307.11829 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    E. J. Gustafson, Y. Ji, H. Lamm, E. M. Murairi, S. O. Perez, and S. Zhu, Primitive quantum gates for an SU(3) discrete subgroup: Σ(36×3), Phys. Rev. D110, 034515 (2024), arXiv:2405.05973 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    M. L. Rhodes, M. Kreshchuk, and S. Pathak, Expo- nential Improvements in the Simulation of Lattice Gauge Theories Using Near-Optimal Techniques, PRX Quantum5, 040347 (2024), arXiv:2405.10416 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum Simula- tion of SU(3) Lattice Yang-Mills Theory at Leading Order in Large-Nc Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 111901 (2024), arXiv:2402.10265 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    D. M. Grabowska, C. F. Kane, and C. W. Bauer, Fully gauge-fixed SU(2) Hamiltonian for quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. D111, 114516 (2025), arXiv:2409.10610 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    A. H. Z. Kavaki and R. Lewis, From square pla- quettes to triamond lattices for SU(2) gauge the- ory, Commun. Phys.7, 208 (2024), arXiv:2401.14570 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Hanada, S. Matsuura, F. Nori, E. Rinaldi, and A. Sch¨ afer, A universal frame- work for the quantum simulation of Yang–Mills the- ory, Commun. Phys.9, 67 (2026), arXiv:2411.13161 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    A. N. Ciavarella, I. M. Burbano, and C. W. Bauer, Efficient truncations of SU(Nc) lattice gauge theory for quantum simulation, Phys. Rev. D112, 054514 (2025), arXiv:2503.11888 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Balaji, C

    P. Balaji, C. Conefrey-Shinozaki, P. Draper, J. K. Elhaderi, D. Gupta, L. Hidalgo, A. Lytle, and E. Rinaldi, Quantum circuits for SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D112, 054511 (2025), arXiv:2503.08866 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    S. O. Perez, E. M. Murairi, E. J. Gustafson, and H. Lamm, Primitive Quantum Gates for an SU(3) Discrete Subgroup: Σ(72×3) (2025), arXiv:2511.17437 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Efficient Quantum Circuits for Schur and Clebsch-Gordan Transforms

    D. Bacon, I. L. Chuang, and A. W. Harrow, Ef- ficient Quantum Circuits for Schur and Clebsch- Gordan Transforms, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 170502 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0407082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    E. M. Murairi, M. Sohaib Alam, H. Lamm, S. Hadfield, and E. Gustafson, Highly-efficient quantum Fourier transformations for certain non- Abelian groups, Phys. Rev. D110, 074501 (2024), arXiv:2408.00075 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Bhanot and C

    G. Bhanot and C. Rebbi, Monte Carlo Simulations of Lattice Models With Finite Subgroups of SU(3) as Gauge Groups, Phys. Rev. D24, 3319 (1981)

    1981

  46. [46]

    Petcher and D

    D. Petcher and D. H. Weingarten, Monte ´Carlo cal- culations and a model of the phase structure for gauge theories on discrete subgroups of su(2), Phys. Rev. D22, 2465 (1980)

    1980

  47. [47]

    Alexandru, P

    A. Alexandru, P. F. Bedaque, S. Harmalkar, H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and N. C. Warrington, Gluon Field Digitization for Quantum Computers, Phys. Rev. D100, 114501 (2019), arXiv:1906.11213 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Bhanot, Su(3) lattice gauge theory in 4 dimen- sions with a modified wilson action, Physics Letters B108, 337 (1982)

    G. Bhanot, Su(3) lattice gauge theory in 4 dimen- sions with a modified wilson action, Physics Letters B108, 337 (1982). 15

    1982

  49. [49]

    Assi and H

    B. Assi and H. Lamm, Digitization and subduction of SU(N) gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D110, 074511 (2024), arXiv:2405.12204 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    A. N. Kirillov and N. Y. Reshetikhin, Representa- tions of the algebra U(q)(sl(2)), q-orthogonal poly- nomials and invariants of links, New Developments in the Theory of Knots , 202 (1990), Accessed here

    1990

  51. [51]

    L. C. Biedenharn and M. A. Lohe,Quantum group symmetry and Q-tensor algebras(World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, Singapore, 1995)

    1995

  52. [52]

    Kassel,Graduate Texts in Mathematics: Quan- tum Groups, Vol

    C. Kassel,Graduate Texts in Mathematics: Quan- tum Groups, Vol. 155 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995)

    1995

  53. [53]

    Introduction to quantum groups

    P. Podle´ s and E. M¨ uller, Introduction to Quantum Groups, Reviews in Mathematical Physics10, 511 (1998), arXiv:q-alg/9704002 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  54. [54]

    M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, String net con- densation: A Physical mechanism for topological phases, Phys. Rev. B71, 045110 (2005), arXiv:cond- mat/0404617

    work page arXiv 2005

  55. [55]

    N. E. Bonesteel and D. P. DiVincenzo, Quantum cir- cuits for measuring Levin-Wen operators, Phys. Rev. B86, 165113 (2012), arXiv:1206.6048 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Hayata and Y

    T. Hayata and Y. Hidaka, String-net formulation of Hamiltonian lattice Yang-Mills theories and quan- tum many-body scars in a nonabelian gauge theory, JHEP09, 126, arXiv:2305.05950 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    T. V. Zache, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, and P. Zoller, Quantum and Classical Spin-Network Algorithms for q-Deformed Kogut-Susskind Gauge Theo- ries, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 171902 (2023), arXiv:2304.02527 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Hayata, Y

    T. Hayata, Y. Hidaka, and Y. Kikuchi, Onset of thermalization of q-deformed SU(2) Yang-Mills the- ory on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2026), arXiv:2601.13530 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    M. John, K. Pareek, P. Tirler, T. Gollerthan, M. Meth, L. Gerster, P. Zoller, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T. V. Zache, and M. Ringbauer, Non-Abelian String- Breaking Dynamics on a Qudit Quantum Computer (2026), arXiv:2605.05841 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Robson and D

    D. Robson and D. M. Webber, Gauge covariance in lattice field theories, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik C Parti- cles and Fields15, 199 (1982)

    1982

  61. [61]

    Jiang, N

    J. Jiang, N. Klco, and O. Di Matteo, Non-Abelian dynamics on a cube: Improving quantum compila- tion through qudit-based simulations, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074512 (2025), arXiv:2506.10945 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian Formula- tion of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D11, 395 (1975)

    1975

  63. [63]

    Digital lattice gauge theories

    E. Zohar, A. Farace, B. Reznik, and J. I. Cirac, Dig- ital lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. A95, 023604 (2017), arXiv:1607.08121 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    S. P. Jordan, K. S. M. Lee, and J. Preskill, Quan- tum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories, Quant. Inf. Comput.14, 1014 (2014), arXiv:1112.4833 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    S. P. Jordan, K. S. M. Lee, and J. Preskill, Quan- tum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories, Sci- ence336, 1130 (2012), arXiv:1111.3633 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Digitization of Scalar Fields for Quantum Computing

    N. Klco and M. J. Savage, Digitization of scalar fields for quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A99, 052335 (2019), arXiv:1808.10378 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, K. Jansen, and S. K¨ uhn, Efficient basis formulation for 1+1 dimen- sional SU(2) lattice gauge theory: Spectral calcula- tions with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. X7, 041046 (2017), arXiv:1707.06434 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    A Rahman, R

    S. A Rahman, R. Lewis, E. Mendicelli, and S. Powell, SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum annealer, Phys. Rev. D104, 034501 (2021), arXiv:2103.08661 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Ciavarella, N

    A. Ciavarella, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Some Con- ceptual Aspects of Operator Design for Quantum Simulations of Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories (2022) arXiv:2203.11988 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Hayata, Y

    T. Hayata, Y. Hidaka, and H. Watanabe, Phases of the q-deformed SU(N) Yang-Mills theory at large N, Phys. Rev. D113, 074517 (2026), arXiv:2601.03843 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    Y. Tong, V. V. Albert, J. R. McClean, J. Preskill, and Y. Su, Provably accurate simulation of gauge theories and bosonic systems, Quantum6, 816 (2022), arXiv:2110.06942 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    A. N. Ciavarella, S. Hariprakash, J. C. Halimeh, and C. W. Bauer, Truncation uncertainties for accurate quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories (2025), arXiv:2508.00061 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Pato and N

    B. Pato and N. Klco, Trade-offs in Gauss’s law error correction for lattice gauge theory quantum simula- tions (2026), arXiv:2602.22121 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Synthesis of Multivalued Quantum Logic Circuits by Elementary Gates

    Y.-M. Di and H.-R. Wei, Synthesis of multivalued quantum logic circuits by elementary gates, Phys. Rev. A87, 012325 (2013), arXiv:1302.0056 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [75]

    Hayata and Y

    T. Hayata and Y. Hidaka, q deformed formulation of Hamiltonian SU(3) Yang-Mills theory, JHEP09, 123, arXiv:2306.12324 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Gokhale, J

    P. Gokhale, J. M. Baker, C. Duckering, N. C. Brown, K. R. Brown, and F. T. Chong, Asymptotic im- provements to quantum circuits via qutrits, 46th In- ternational Symposium on Computer Architecture 10.1145/3307650.3322253 (2019), arXiv:1905.10481 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1145/3307650.3322253 2019

  77. [77]

    Litteken, J

    A. Litteken, J. M. Baker, and F. T. Chong, Communication Trade Offs in Intermediate Qudit Circuits, 2022 IEEE 52nd International 16 Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic 10.1109/IS- MVL52857.2022.00014 (2022), arXiv:2211.16469 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1109/is- 2022

  78. [78]

    A. G. Fowler, Time-optimal quantum computation (2012), arXiv:1210.4626 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  79. [79]

    Litinski, Magic State Distillation: Not as Costly as You Think, Quantum3, 205 (2019), arXiv:1905.06903 [quant-ph]

    D. Litinski, Magic State Distillation: Not as Costly as You Think, Quantum3, 205 (2019), arXiv:1905.06903 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    I. H. Kim, Catalyticz-rotations in constantT-depth (2025), arXiv:2506.15147 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.