arxiv: 2605.15198 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.CL

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

ATLAS: Agentic or Latent Visual Reasoning? One Word is Enough for Both

Ziyu Guo , Rain Liu , Xinyan Chen , Pheng-Ann Heng

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 03:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

keywords visual reasoningfunctional tokenagentic reasoninglatent reasoningmultimodal modelsnext-token predictionreinforcement learninginterpretability

0 comments

The pith

One discrete functional token suffices for both agentic operations and latent visual reasoning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces ATLAS, in which a single learned functional token acts as both an agentic operation and a latent visual reasoning unit inside a multimodal model. This token internalizes visual operations without visual supervision and is produced through ordinary next-token prediction, avoiding the need to generate intermediate images or invoke external tools. The design preserves full compatibility with standard supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning pipelines, while a new auxiliary objective called Latent-Anchored GRPO stabilizes training when the tokens appear infrequently. Experiments show the resulting models reach higher scores on challenging visual reasoning benchmarks and retain interpretable reasoning traces.

Core claim

ATLAS shows that a single discrete functional token, associated with an internalized visual operation, can serve simultaneously as an agentic operation and a latent visual reasoning unit. The token requires no visual supervision, stays inside the standard tokenizer vocabulary, and is generated via next-token prediction, allowing the entire system to train with unmodified autoregressive objectives and without architectural changes.

What carries the argument

The functional token: a single discrete vocabulary item that encodes an internalized visual operation usable for both agentic and latent reasoning.

If this is right

Eliminates context-switching latency from external tool execution during reasoning.
Avoids the computational cost of generating intermediate visual content.
Maintains full compatibility with vanilla SFT and RL training pipelines.
Provides explicit interpretability by exposing the functional tokens in the generated sequence.
Stabilizes RL training of sparse functional tokens through the LA-GRPO auxiliary objective.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Discrete functional tokens may offer a more parameter-efficient way to represent visual operations than continuous latent embeddings.
The same token design could be tested on non-visual reasoning domains by learning analogous task-specific tokens.
Long-horizon visual planning tasks might see reduced token budget and lower latency if functional tokens replace explicit image generation steps.
The exposed token sequence could enable targeted intervention or editing of individual reasoning steps at inference time.

Load-bearing premise

A single discrete functional token can effectively internalize visual operations without any visual supervision and still generalize across tasks when generated via standard next-token prediction.

What would settle it

An ablation in which models trained with ATLAS are evaluated after the functional tokens are replaced by randomly initialized tokens at inference time, checking whether performance on visual reasoning benchmarks drops to the level of ordinary next-token baselines.

read the original abstract

Visual reasoning, often interleaved with intermediate visual states, has emerged as a promising direction in the field. A straightforward approach is to directly generate images via unified models during reasoning, but this is computationally expensive and architecturally non-trivial. Recent alternatives include agentic reasoning through code or tool calls, and latent reasoning with learnable hidden embeddings. However, agentic methods incur context-switching latency from external execution, while latent methods lack task generalization and are difficult to train with autoregressive parallelization. To combine their strengths while mitigating their limitations, we propose ATLAS, a framework in which a single discrete 'word', termed as a functional token, serves both as an agentic operation and a latent visual reasoning unit. Each functional token is associated with an internalized visual operation, yet requires no visual supervision and remains a standard token in the tokenizer vocabulary, which can be generated via next-token prediction. This design avoids verbose intermediate visual content generation, while preserving compatibility with the vanilla scalable SFT and RL training, without architectural or methodological modifications. To further address the sparsity of functional tokens during RL, we introduce Latent-Anchored GRPO (LA-GRPO), which stabilizes the training by anchoring functional tokens with a statically weighted auxiliary objective, providing stronger gradient updates. Extensive experiments and analyses demonstrate that ATLAS achieves superior performance on challenging benchmarks while maintaining clear interpretability. We hope ATLAS offers a new paradigm inspiring future visual reasoning research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ATLAS's single functional token unifies agentic and latent visual reasoning in a training-compatible way, but its ability to internalize operations without supervision needs verification from the experiments.

read the letter

The one thing to know is that ATLAS uses a single vocabulary token as both an agentic operation and a latent visual reasoning unit, trained purely through next-token prediction with no visual supervision or model changes. This setup aims to skip the cost of generating intermediate images and the latency of external tool calls while keeping training simple. The paper shows how this token gets associated with internalized visual operations and introduces LA-GRPO to stabilize RL training when these tokens are sparse by adding a weighted auxiliary objective. That part looks practical for anyone scaling up reinforcement learning on multimodal models. What works here is the compatibility with standard SFT and RL pipelines, which avoids the architectural headaches of unified image generation models. It also tries to give interpretability by making the token discrete and observable in the output sequence. The main concern is whether the token really learns useful visual operations or just becomes a learned filler. The abstract claims better performance on benchmarks and clear interpretability, but the provided details don't include any numbers, ablation studies, or tests that isolate the token's visual effect. If the full paper has those, they need to demonstrate that the token's behavior is driven by visual reasoning rather than statistical correlations in the data. Without that, the unification claim stays more conceptual than proven. This paper is aimed at researchers working on efficient visual reasoning in large multimodal models, especially those looking for ways to improve latency and training stability without major redesigns. Someone focused on agentic or latent reasoning methods could find the LA-GRPO technique useful even if the main results don't hold up strongly. I would recommend sending it to peer review. The idea is novel enough to warrant referee input on the experiments, and the training modifications are straightforward to evaluate.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ATLAS, a framework for visual reasoning in which a single discrete functional token from the standard vocabulary serves simultaneously as an agentic operation and a latent visual reasoning unit. The token is generated via next-token prediction with no visual supervision or architectural changes to the base model. The authors introduce Latent-Anchored GRPO (LA-GRPO) to stabilize RL training by anchoring functional tokens with an auxiliary objective. Extensive experiments are claimed to show superior performance on challenging benchmarks together with maintained interpretability.

Significance. If the functional token can be shown to internalize and execute generalizable visual operations, ATLAS would usefully combine the efficiency of latent reasoning with the interpretability of discrete agentic steps while remaining compatible with standard SFT and RL pipelines. The LA-GRPO stabilization technique addresses a concrete training difficulty and could transfer to other sparse-token settings. The absence of image generation or external tool calls is a practical advantage for scalable multimodal models.

major comments (2)

[Method] Method section: the claim that the functional token internalizes meaningful visual operations without any visual supervision or explicit mechanism rests on an unverified assumption about what standard next-token prediction can achieve. No derivation, equation, or ablation isolates the token's effect as visual reasoning rather than statistical pattern completion, which is load-bearing for both the performance and interpretability assertions.
[Experiments] Experiments section: the manuscript asserts superior performance on challenging benchmarks, yet no specific quantitative results, tables, or ablation studies are referenced that demonstrate the functional token's contribution or compare against baselines with and without the token. This prevents evaluation of whether gains are attributable to the proposed mechanism.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: key numerical results supporting the performance claims should be included to allow readers to assess the magnitude of improvement.
[Method] The description of LA-GRPO would benefit from an explicit equation for the auxiliary weighting term to clarify how it differs from standard GRPO.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and rigor where needed.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Method] Method section: the claim that the functional token internalizes meaningful visual operations without any visual supervision or explicit mechanism rests on an unverified assumption about what standard next-token prediction can achieve. No derivation, equation, or ablation isolates the token's effect as visual reasoning rather than statistical pattern completion, which is load-bearing for both the performance and interpretability assertions.

Authors: We agree that the current presentation relies primarily on empirical demonstration rather than a formal derivation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in Methods that provides a theoretical motivation grounded in the properties of autoregressive next-token prediction, together with new ablations that directly compare model variants with and without the functional token to isolate its contribution beyond statistical pattern completion. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: the manuscript asserts superior performance on challenging benchmarks, yet no specific quantitative results, tables, or ablation studies are referenced that demonstrate the functional token's contribution or compare against baselines with and without the token. This prevents evaluation of whether gains are attributable to the proposed mechanism.

Authors: We apologize that the submitted version did not sufficiently highlight or cross-reference the quantitative results. The full manuscript contains the relevant tables and ablations; in the revision we will explicitly insert and cite these results in the Experiments section, including direct comparisons of ATLAS against baselines with and without the functional token to make the attribution of gains transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; proposal relies on standard next-token prediction

full rationale

The ATLAS framework defines a functional token as simultaneously agentic and latent via standard autoregressive training with no visual supervision. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown reducing the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The design is presented as compatible with vanilla SFT/RL without architectural changes, and performance claims rest on empirical benchmarks rather than a closed definitional loop. This is the normal non-circular outcome for a proposal paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on the assumption that standard autoregressive training can produce effective functional tokens without visual supervision or architectural changes.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Next-token prediction suffices to generate functional tokens that internalize visual operations
Stated as compatible with vanilla SFT and RL training without modifications

invented entities (1)

functional token no independent evidence
purpose: Serves as both agentic operation and latent visual reasoning unit
New discrete token introduced in the vocabulary to replace image generation or hidden embeddings

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1101 out tokens · 50392 ms · 2026-05-15T03:05:18.872222+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

a single discrete 'word', termed as a functional token, serves both as an agentic operation and a latent visual reasoning unit... remains a standard token in the tokenizer vocabulary, which can be generated via next-token prediction
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

LA-GRPO augments the standard GRPO objective with a statically weighted token-level auxiliary loss anchored on the functional-token vocabulary

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · 15 internal anchors

[1]

LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training

Xiang An, Yin Xie, Kaicheng Yang, Wenkang Zhang, Xiuwei Zhao, Zheng Cheng, Yirui Wang, Songcen Xu, Changrui Chen, Chunsheng Wu, et al. Llava-onevision-1.5: Fully open framework for democratized multimodal training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23661,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

Qwen3-VL Technical Report

https: //www.anthropic.com/claude-4-system-card. Available athttps://www.anthropic.com/claude-4-system-card. Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025a. Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

Anole: An open, autoregressive, native large multimodal models for interleaved image-text generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06135,

Ethan Chern, Jiadi Su, Yan Ma, and Pengfei Liu. Anole: An open, autoregressive, native large multimodal models for interleaved image-text generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06135,

work page arXiv
[4]

Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, Ice Pasupat, Noveen Sachdeva, Inderjit Dhillon, Marcel Blistein, Ori Ram, Dan Zhang, Evan Rosen, et al. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[5]

Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining

Chaorui Deng, Deyao Zhu, Kunchang Li, Chenhui Gou, Feng Li, Zeyu Wang, Shu Zhong, Weihao Yu, Xiaonan Nie, Ziang Song, et al. Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space

Shibo Hao, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, DiJia Su, Xian Li, Zhiting Hu, Jason Weston, and Yuandong Tian. Training large language models to reason in a continuous latent space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06769,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

Mme-cot: Benchmarking chain-of-thought in large multimodal models for reasoning quality, robustness, and efficiency.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09621,

Dongzhi Jiang, Renrui Zhang, Ziyu Guo, Yanwei Li, Yu Qi, Xinyan Chen, Liuhui Wang, Jianhan Jin, Claire Guo, Shen Yan, et al. Mme-cot: Benchmarking chain-of-thought in large multimodal models for reasoning quality, robustness, and efficiency.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09621,

work page arXiv
[8]

Latent visual reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.24251, 2025a

Bangzheng Li, Ximeng Sun, Jiang Liu, Ze Wang, Jialian Wu, Xiaodong Yu, Hao Chen, Emad Barsoum, Muhao Chen, and Zicheng Liu. Latent visual reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.24251, 2025a. Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Dong Guo, Renrui Zhang, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Kaichen Zhang, Yanwei Li, Ziwei Liu, and Chunyuan Li. Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer.arXiv ...

work page arXiv
[9]

Imagine while reasoning in space: Multimodal visualization-of-thought, 2025b.https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07542

Chengzu Li, Wenshan Wu, Huanyu Zhang, Yan Xia, Shaoguang Mao, Li Dong, Ivan Vulić, and Furu Wei. Imagine while reasoning in space: Multimodal visualization-of-thought, 2025b.https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07542. Baijiong Lin, Weisen Jiang, Feiyang Ye, Yu Zhang, Pengguang Chen, Ying-Cong Chen, Shu Liu, and James T Kwok. Dual-balancing for multi-task learning.a...

work page arXiv
[10]

Llava-next.https: //llava-vl.github.io/blog/2024-01-30-llava-next/,

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Sheng Shen, and Yong Jae Lee. Llava-next.https: //llava-vl.github.io/blog/2024-01-30-llava-next/,

work page 2024
[11]

Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL

Accessed: 2025-02-14. Jie Liu, Gongye Liu, Jiajun Liang, Yangguang Li, Jiaheng Liu, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Wanli Ouyang. Flow-grpo: Training flow matching models via online rl.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05470, 2025a. 16 Zhiheng Liu, Weiming Ren, Haozhe Liu, Zijian Zhou, Shoufa Chen, Haonan Qiu, Xiaoke Huang, Zhaochong An, Fanny Yang, Adity...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[12]

MM-Eureka: Exploring the Frontiers of Multimodal Reasoning with Rule-based Reinforcement Learning

Fanqing Meng, Lingxiao Du, Zongkai Liu, Zhixiang Zhou, Quanfeng Lu, Daocheng Fu, Tiancheng Han, Botian Shi, Wenhai Wang, Junjun He, et al. Mm-eureka: Exploring the frontiers of multimodal reasoning with rule-based reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07365,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[13]

Accessed: 2024-12-11

https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/google-deepmind/ google-gemini-ai-update-december-2024/. Accessed: 2024-12-11. Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, MinhuiWu MinhuiWu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang, Zhuoma Gongque, Shanglin Lei, Yifan Zhang, et al. We-math: Does your large multimodal model achieve human-like mathematica...

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Bytedance Seed. Seed1. 8 model card: Towards generalized real-world agency.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20633,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[15]

Hao Shao, Shengju Qian, Han Xiao, Guanglu Song, Zhuofan Zong, Letian Wang, Yu Liu, and Hongsheng Li. Visual cot: Advancing multi-modal language models with a comprehensive dataset and benchmark for chain-of-thought reasoning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:8612–8642, 2024a. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

Pixel Reasoner: Incentivizing Pixel-Space Reasoning with Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning

Alex Su, Haozhe Wang, Weiming Ren, Fangzhen Lin, and Wenhu Chen. Pixel reasoner: Incentivizing pixel-space reasoning with curiosity-driven reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15966,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[17]

Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context

Gemini Team, Petko Georgiev, Ving Ian Lei, Ryan Burnell, Libin Bai, Anmol Gulati, Garrett Tanzer, Damien Vincent, Zhufeng Pan, Shibo Wang, et al. Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[18]

Gemma Team, Aishwarya Kamath, Johan Ferret, Shreya Pathak, Nino Vieillard, Ramona Merhej, Sarah Perrin, Tatiana Matejovicova, Alexandre Ramé, Morgane Rivière, Louis Rouillard, Thomas Mesnard, Geoffrey Cideron, Jean bastien Grill, Sabela Ramos, Edouard Yvinec, Michelle Casbon, Etienne Pot, Ivo Penchev, Gaël Liu, Francesco Visin, Kathleen Kenealy, Lucas Bey...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[19]

Show-o: One Single Transformer to Unify Multimodal Understanding and Generation

Jinheng Xie, Weijia Mao, Zechen Bai, David Junhao Zhang, Weihao Wang, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Yuchao Gu, Zhijie Chen, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12528,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[20]

DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation

Zeyue Xue, Jie Wu, Yu Gao, Fangyuan Kong, Lingting Zhu, Mengzhao Chen, Zhiheng Liu, Wei Liu, Qiushan Guo, Weilin Huang, et al. Dancegrpo: Unleashing grpo on visual generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07818,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[21]

Quiet-star: Language models can teach themselves to think before speaking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09629,

Eric Zelikman, Georges Harik, Yijia Shao, Varuna Jayasiri, Nick Haber, and Noah D Goodman. Quiet-star: Language models can teach themselves to think before speaking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09629,

work page arXiv
[22]

Mathverse: Does your multi-modal llm truly see the diagrams in visual math problems? ECCV 2024,

Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yichi Zhang, Haokun Lin, Ziyu Guo, Pengshuo Qiu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Peng Gao, et al. Mathverse: Does your multi-modal llm truly see the diagrams in visual math problems? ECCV 2024,

work page 2024
[23]

Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models

Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, and Alex Smola. Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning in language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00923,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[24]

thinking with images

Shanshan Zhao, Xinjie Zhang, Jintao Guo, Jiakui Hu, Lunhao Duan, Minghao Fu, Yong Xien Chng, Guo-Hua Wang, Qing-Guo Chen, Zhao Xu, et al. Unified multimodal understanding and generation models: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02567, 2025a. Xuandong Zhao, Zhewei Kang, Aosong Feng, Sergey Levine, and Dawn Song. Learning to ...

work page arXiv