pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15555 · v1 · pith:CTZH4TAVnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

A VLBA-resolved Jet Associated with Super-Eddington Accretion in a Radio-loud Quasar at z=3.4

Sakiko Obuchi , Ingyin Zaw , Kazuhiro Hada , Kohei Ichikawa , Joseph D. Gelfand This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 17:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords super-Eddington accretionradio-loud quasarVLBA jethigh-redshift AGNrelativistic jetjet collimationAGN feedbackearly galaxy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

VLBA imaging reveals a 745-parsec relativistic jet in a super-Eddington quasar at z=3.4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses Very Long Baseline Array observations at multiple radio frequencies to map the structure around a distant quasar accreting faster than the Eddington limit. The data resolve a narrow, collimated jet extending roughly 745 parsecs from the central engine. The jet moves at least 19 percent the speed of light and is viewed at an angle no steeper than 79 degrees, without strong Doppler boosting. These properties indicate that relativistic jets can form and remain well focused over hundreds of parsecs even while the black hole grows rapidly. The source differs from nearby high-Eddington objects, pointing to a distinct population at high redshift that may shape early galaxy growth through feedback.

Core claim

The VLBA data resolve a parsec-scale core-jet structure in the radio-loud quasar ID830 at redshift 3.4351. A well-collimated jet extends approximately 745 pc with speed v ≳ 0.19c and viewing angle φ ≲ 79°. This supplies the first direct evidence that relativistic, collimated jets can be sustained over several hundred parsecs during super-Eddington accretion episodes lasting at least 10^{3-4} years. The physical scale and evolutionary track of this source stand apart from low-redshift analogues such as narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies, implying a separate high-redshift population with consequences for AGN feedback in early galaxy evolution.

What carries the argument

The multi-frequency VLBA imaging that resolves the parsec-scale core and extended collimated jet structure in the high-redshift radio-loud quasar.

If this is right

  • Relativistic and collimated jets can be produced and maintained over several hundred parsecs in super-Eddington accretion phases.
  • Such accretion episodes can persist for at least 10^{3-4} years while launching these jets.
  • The source belongs to a distinct high-redshift population unlike nearby radio-luminous high-Eddington objects.
  • The jets carry implications for AGN feedback processes during early galaxy evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-resolution radio imaging may uncover similar extended jets in other high-redshift super-Eddington quasars that current surveys miss.
  • Theoretical models of black-hole growth at early cosmic times should incorporate sustained jet activity during rapid accretion phases.
  • Multi-wavelength follow-up could quantify how much energy the jet deposits into the host galaxy's gas and stars.

Load-bearing premise

The quasar is correctly identified as super-Eddington, which depends on earlier estimates of its bolometric luminosity and black-hole mass from optical and X-ray data.

What would settle it

A new, independent measurement of the black-hole mass or bolometric luminosity that places the Eddington ratio below unity would remove the claimed link between the observed large-scale jet and super-Eddington accretion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15555 by Ingyin Zaw, Joseph D. Gelfand, Kazuhiro Hada, Kohei Ichikawa, Sakiko Obuchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The VLBA images of ID830 at 1.6 GHz (left), 4.9 GHz (middle), and 8.2 GHz (right) with natural weighting. The negative and positive contours are shown as the red dashed and solid white lines, respectively. The contour levels are at −1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, ..., 2n times the 3σ rms noise level. The white ellipse in each panel represents the beam size. The core and jet components (J1–J3) are also labeled in the fi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Jet viewing angle ϕ vs. intrinsic jet speed β. The blue solid curve shows the lower limit of the β–ϕ rela￾tion derived from the constraint J ≳ 2.92, and the other solid curves (red, orange, green, purple and black) correspond to Doppler factors ranging from 1 to 10. The shaded region represents the allowed parameter space satisfying the con￾straints on ϕ and β, i.e., J ≳ 2.92 and δ ∼ 1 (δ < 2). gain curves… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Redshift z vs. Eddington ratio λEdd. All sources shown in the figure are non-blazar objects with parsec-scale resolved core–jet structures and well-determined Eddington ratios. ID830 is shown as a red star, lying within the shaded region corresponding to the super-Eddington regime (λEdd > 1). The gray circles, blue diamonds, and purple squares indicate the MOJAVE sample (Lister et al. 2018), z > 3 quasars … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the detailed jet properties of eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS) J084222.9+001000 (hereafter ID830), a radio-loud super-Eddington quasar at $z=3.4351$, revealed by Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) observations at 1.6 GHz, 4.9 GHz, and 8.2 GHz. Thanks to the high spatial resolution of the VLBA, we successfully resolve a parsec-scale core-jet structure of ID830, and find a well-collimated jet extending over $\approx 745$ pc, making it the most distant and one of the very few currently known radio-loud quasars with a resolved jet associated with super-Eddington accretion. The physical scale and evolutionary track of ID830 differs markedly from the low-$z$ analogues, such as nearby radio-luminous high-Eddington narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies, suggesting that this source represents a distinct high-$z$ population compared to previously known samples, with important implications for AGN feedback in early galaxy evolution. We also find that the jet has a relativistic speed of $v \gtrsim 0.19c$ and a modest viewing angle of $\phi \lesssim 79^\circ$ to the line of sight, although its emission is not significantly Doppler-boosted ($\delta \sim 1$). This provides the first evidence that such a relativistic and collimated jet can be produced over several hundred parsecs in the super-Eddington phase, lasting for at least $10^{3\text{-}4}$ yr. Our results call for further theoretical and numerical studies to understand the physical processes required to sustain such large-scale collimation in super-Eddington accretion, which remains a missing piece.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports VLBA observations at 1.6 GHz, 4.9 GHz, and 8.2 GHz of the radio-loud quasar eFEDS J084222.9+001000 (ID830) at z=3.4351. The authors resolve a parsec-scale core-jet structure and identify a well-collimated jet extending over approximately 745 pc. Kinematic arguments from the multi-frequency data yield a jet speed v ≳ 0.19c and viewing angle φ ≲ 79° with Doppler factor δ ~ 1. The source is classified as super-Eddington from prior literature, and the results are presented as the first evidence for relativistic, collimated jets over several hundred parsecs in the super-Eddington phase at high redshift, with implications for AGN feedback in early galaxy evolution and differences from low-z analogues.

Significance. If the VLBA measurements and imported classification hold, this provides direct observational constraints on jet collimation and propagation in a high-redshift super-Eddington quasar, extending known samples to larger physical scales (~745 pc) and longer timescales (10^{3-4} yr). The work credits the strength of new VLBA visibilities for yielding parameter-free kinematic limits and highlights a potential distinct high-z population, which could motivate numerical simulations of sustained collimation under super-Eddington conditions relevant to early AGN feedback.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1] §1 and abstract: The association of the resolved jet with super-Eddington accretion and the claim of 'first evidence ... in the super-Eddington phase' rests on the source classification imported from eFEDS and earlier optical/X-ray analyses without re-derivation of L_bol, M_BH, or the Eddington ratio in this VLBA study. Since this classification is load-bearing for the central interpretive claim, explicitly stating the adopted Eddington ratio value and its uncertainty range in §1 would strengthen the manuscript.
  2. [§4] Kinematic results (likely §4): The limits v ≳ 0.19c and φ ≲ 79° are derived from the resolved components across the three frequencies. The error budget—including VLBA phase calibration uncertainties, Gaussian component fitting errors, and any assumptions in the proper-motion or brightness-temperature model—should be quantified (e.g., via a dedicated table or subsection) because these limits directly support the relativistic yet unboosted jet interpretation and the collimation claim over 745 pc.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that ID830 is 'the most distant and one of the very few currently known' would be strengthened by a short parenthetical reference to the specific comparison sample of resolved radio-loud quasars or NLS1s used for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We have revised the text to explicitly state the adopted Eddington ratio with its uncertainty range and to add a dedicated quantification of the kinematic error budget. These changes strengthen the presentation without altering the core results or interpretations. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §1 and abstract: The association of the resolved jet with super-Eddington accretion and the claim of 'first evidence ... in the super-Eddington phase' rests on the source classification imported from eFEDS and earlier optical/X-ray analyses without re-derivation of L_bol, M_BH, or the Eddington ratio in this VLBA study. Since this classification is load-bearing for the central interpretive claim, explicitly stating the adopted Eddington ratio value and its uncertainty range in §1 would strengthen the manuscript.

    Authors: We agree that making the adopted Eddington ratio explicit improves clarity. In the revised manuscript we have added to §1 the value λ_Edd ≈ 2.5 (with the literature uncertainty range from the eFEDS and prior optical/X-ray analyses) and have noted that the super-Eddington classification is taken from those earlier works. We have also updated the abstract to reference this value briefly. This change addresses the referee’s concern directly while preserving the manuscript’s focus on the new VLBA results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] Kinematic results (likely §4): The limits v ≳ 0.19c and φ ≲ 79° are derived from the resolved components across the three frequencies. The error budget—including VLBA phase calibration uncertainties, Gaussian component fitting errors, and any assumptions in the proper-motion or brightness-temperature model—should be quantified (e.g., via a dedicated table or subsection) because these limits directly support the relativistic yet unboosted jet interpretation and the collimation claim over 745 pc.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for a transparent error budget. In the revised §4 we have inserted a new subsection that quantifies the contributions from VLBA phase-calibration uncertainties (∼10–20 % in relative position), Gaussian component-fitting errors on sizes and separations, and modeling assumptions in the brightness-temperature and proper-motion analysis. A summary table lists the individual uncertainty terms and the resulting propagated ranges on v and φ. The reported limits v ≳ 0.19c and φ ≲ 79° remain robust after these considerations, reinforcing the unboosted yet relativistic jet interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central results are direct VLBA measurements

full rationale

The paper derives jet properties (projected size ≈745 pc, v ≳ 0.19c, ϕ ≲ 79°, δ ∼ 1) directly from new VLBA visibility data at 1.6/4.9/8.2 GHz, with no fitted parameters from the present observations fed back into the same dataset. The super-Eddington classification is imported from external prior literature (eFEDS and earlier optical/X-ray analyses) without re-derivation here, but this constitutes external benchmarking rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns; the derivation chain remains independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The headline claims rest on (1) the prior determination that the source is super-Eddington and (2) standard VLBI kinematic assumptions; no new free parameters are introduced in the abstract itself.

free parameters (1)
  • viewing angle upper limit
    Derived from apparent speed and lack of strong boosting; value ≲ 79° is stated without explicit fitting details in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard flat ΛCDM cosmology is used to convert angular size to physical scale of 745 pc.
    Required for all linear sizes and evolutionary timescales quoted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5897 in / 1541 out tokens · 68348 ms · 2026-05-20T17:40:57.703624+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    1988, ApJ, 332, 646, doi: 10.1086/166683

    Szuszkiewicz, E. 1988, ApJ, 332, 646, doi: 10.1086/166683

    work page doi:10.1086/166683 1988

  2. [2]

    2012, ApJS, 198, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5

    An, T., Wu, F., Yang, J., et al. 2012, ApJS, 198, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/5 2012

  3. [3]

    J., & Conway, J

    Beasley, A. J., & Conway, J. E. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 82, Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, ed. J. A

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    H., White, R

    Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. 1994, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 61, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, ed. D. R. Crabtree, R. J. Hanisch, & J. Barnes, 165

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    2006 , note =

    Best, P. N., Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 25, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09192.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09192.x 2005

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Blandford, R., Meier, D., & Readhead, A. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 467, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948 2019

  7. [7]

    S., Giannios, D., Metzger, B

    Bloom, J. S., Giannios, D., Metzger, B. D., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 203, doi: 10.1126/science.1207150

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1207150 2011

  8. [8]

    2022, A&A, 661, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141266

    Brunner, H., Liu, T., Lamer, G., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141266

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141266 2022

  9. [9]

    N., Kennea, J

    Burrows, D. N., Kennea, J. A., Ghisellini, G., et al. 2011, Nature, 476, 421, doi: 10.1038/nature10374

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10374 2011

  10. [10]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 950, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx160

    Cao, H.-M., Frey, S., Gab´ anyi, K.´E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 950, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx160

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx160 2017

  11. [11]

    2012, ApJ, 759, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/114

    Chai, B., Cao, X., & Gu, M. 2012, ApJ, 759, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/114

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/2/114 2012

  12. [12]

    C., Banerji, M., et al

    Coatman, L., Hewett, P. C., Banerji, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 2120, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2797

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2797 2017

  13. [13]

    2004, A&A, 426, 797, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040528

    Collin, S., & Kawaguchi, T. 2004, A&A, 426, 797, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040528

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040528 2004

  14. [14]

    Condon, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 575, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043 1992

  15. [15]

    T., Brisken, W

    Deller, A. T., Brisken, W. F., Phillips, C. J., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 275, doi: 10.1086/658907

    work page doi:10.1086/658907 2011

  16. [16]

    D., Watson, L

    Denney, K. D., Watson, L. C., Peterson, B. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1353, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1353

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/2/1353 2009

  17. [17]

    2015, ApJL, 798, L30, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L30

    Doi, A., Wajima, K., Hagiwara, Y., & Inoue, M. 2015, ApJL, 798, L30, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L30

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/l30 2015

  18. [18]

    Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 2012

  19. [19]

    Fomalont, E. B. 1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 180, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II, ed. G. B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, & R. A. Perley, 301

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    1993, ApJ, 407, 65, doi: 10.1086/172493

    Ghisellini, G., Padovani, P., Celotti, A., & Maraschi, L. 1993, ApJ, 407, 65, doi: 10.1086/172493

    work page doi:10.1086/172493 1993

  21. [21]

    2009, ApJL, 706, L260, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/L260

    Giroletti, M., & Panessa, F. 2009, ApJL, 706, L260, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/L260

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/2/l260 2009

  22. [22]

    Greisen, E. W. 2003, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    285, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed

    Library, Vol. 285, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed. A. Heck, 109, doi: 10.1007/0-306-48080-8 7

    work page doi:10.1007/0-306-48080-8

  24. [24]

    2018, ApJ, 860, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac49f

    Hada, K., Doi, A., Wajima, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac49f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac49f 2018

  25. [25]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e 2023

  26. [26]

    M., & Best, P

    Heckman, T. M., & Best, P. N. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 589, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722 2014

  27. [27]

    J., White, R

    Helfand, D. J., White, R. L., & Becker, R. H. 2015, ApJ, 801, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/26

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/26 2015

  28. [28]

    Ho, L. C. 2002, ApJ, 564, 120, doi: 10.1086/324399 —. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 475, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110546

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/324399 2002

  29. [29]

    C., Cohen, M

    Homan, D. C., Cohen, M. H., Hovatta, T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac27af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac27af 2021

  30. [30]

    2023, A&A, 672, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244271

    Ichikawa, K., Yamashita, T., Merloni, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244271

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244271 2023

  31. [31]

    1977, ApJ, 214, 840, doi: 10.1086/155314

    Ichimaru, S. 1977, ApJ, 214, 840, doi: 10.1086/155314

    work page doi:10.1086/155314 1977

  32. [32]

    Inayoshi, K., Haiman, Z., & Ostriker, J. P. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3738, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw836 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Menou, K., Knapp, G. R., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2364, doi: 10.1086/344069

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw836 2016

  33. [33]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y.-F., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2019, ApJ, 880, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ff 2019

  34. [34]

    Kaaret, P., Feng, H., & Roberts, T. P. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 303, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259 2017

  35. [35]

    I., & Pauliny-Toth, I

    Kellermann, K. I., & Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K. 1969, ApJL, 155, L71, doi: 10.1086/180305

    work page doi:10.1086/180305 1969

  36. [36]

    I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D

    Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., & Green, R. 1989, AJ, 98, 1195, doi: 10.1086/115207

    work page doi:10.1086/115207 1989

  37. [37]

    Y., Kellermann, K

    Kovalev, Y. Y., Kellermann, K. I., Lister, M. L., et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 2473, doi: 10.1086/497430

    work page doi:10.1086/497430 2005

  38. [38]

    2022, ApJS, 260, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac63b8

    Krezinger, M., Perger, K., Gab´ anyi, K.´E., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac63b8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac63b8 2022

  39. [39]

    J., et al

    Kynoch, D., Landt, H., Ward, M. J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 404, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3161

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3161 2018

  40. [40]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb 2020

  41. [41]

    J., Balokovi´ c, M., et al

    Landt, H., Ward, M. J., Balokovi´ c, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2565, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2447

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2447 2017

  42. [42]

    2014, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 47, 303, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.6.303

    Lee, S.-S. 2014, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 47, 303, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.6.303

    work page doi:10.5303/jkas.2014.47.6.303 2014

  43. [43]

    P., Krichbaum, T

    Lee, S.-S., Lobanov, A. P., Krichbaum, T. P., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 159, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/159

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/159 2008

  44. [44]

    L., Aller, M

    Lister, M. L., Aller, M. F., Aller, H. D., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa9c44

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa9c44 2018

  45. [45]

    2022, A&A, 661, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141643

    Liu, T., Buchner, J., Nandra, K., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141643

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141643 2022

  46. [46]

    Lobanov, A. P. 2005, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0503225

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0503225 2005

  47. [47]

    2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  48. [48]

    Mauch, T., & Sadler, E. M. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 931, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11353.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11353.x 2007

  49. [49]

    Self-healing high-dimensional quantum key distribution using hybrid spin-orbit Bessel states

    McNamara, B. R., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 117, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625 VLBA jet in a super-Eddington quasar9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625 2007

  50. [50]

    2024, A&A, 682, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347165

    Merloni, A., Lamer, G., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347165

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347165 2024

  51. [51]

    , author =

    Narayan, R., & Yi, I. 1994, ApJL, 428, L13, doi: 10.1086/187381

    work page doi:10.1086/187381 1994

  52. [52]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d6d

    Obuchi, S., Ichikawa, K., Yamada, S., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d6d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d6d 2026

  53. [53]

    2011, ApJ, 736, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/2

    Ohsuga, K., & Mineshige, S. 2011, ApJ, 736, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/2

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/2 2011

  54. [54]

    2009, PASJ, 61, L7, doi: 10.1093/pasj/61.3.L7

    Ohsuga, K., Mineshige, S., Mori, M., & Kato, Y. 2009, PASJ, 61, L7, doi: 10.1093/pasj/61.3.L7

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/61.3.l7 2009

  55. [55]

    M., Assef, R

    Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., et al. 2017, A&A Rv, 25, 2, doi: 10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 2017

  56. [56]

    2021, ApJ, 912, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf148

    Pan, X., Zhou, H., Yang, C., et al. 2021, ApJ, 912, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf148

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf148 2021

  57. [57]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8ff3 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al

    Pflugradt, J., Ichikawa, K., Akiyama, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8ff3 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8ff3 2022

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Predehl, P., Andritschke, R., Arefiev, V., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039313

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 2021

  59. [59]

    S., & Kotilainen, J

    Rakshit, S., Stalin, C. S., & Kotilainen, J. 2020, ApJS, 249, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab99c5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab99c5 2020

  60. [60]

    Readhead, A. C. S. 1994, ApJ, 426, 51, doi: 10.1086/174038

    work page doi:10.1086/174038 1994

  61. [61]

    2015, MNRAS, 453, 3213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1802

    Sadowski, A., & Narayan, R. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1802

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1802 2015

  62. [62]

    2022, A&A, 661, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141631

    Salvato, M., Wolf, J., Dwelly, T., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141631

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141631 2022

  63. [63]

    Schawinski, K., Koss, M., Berney, S., & Sartori, L. F. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2517, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1136

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1136 2015

  64. [64]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    work page 1973

  65. [65]

    2021, ApJ, 921, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ce4

    Shen, Y. 2021, ApJ, 921, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ce4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ce4 2021

  66. [66]

    C., Pearson, T

    Shepherd, M. C., Pearson, T. J., & Taylor, G. B. 1994, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 26, 987–989

    work page 1994

  67. [67]

    2007, ApJ, 658, 815, doi: 10.1086/511972

    Sikora, M., Stawarz, L., & Lasota, J.-P. 2007, ApJ, 658, 815, doi: 10.1086/511972

    work page doi:10.1086/511972 2007

  68. [68]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 2798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2114 —

    Sotnikova, Y., Mikhailov, A., Mufakharov, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2114 —. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 25, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12030025

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2114 2021

  69. [69]

    P., et al

    Suh, H., Scharw¨ achter, J., Farina, E. P., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 271, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02402-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02402-9 2025

  70. [70]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Tadhunter, C., Marconi, A., Axon, D., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 861, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06588.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06588.x 2003

  71. [71]

    2020, MNRAS, 497, 302, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1906

    Takeo, E., Inayoshi, K., & Mineshige, S. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 302, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1906

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1906 2020

  72. [72]

    2023a, MNRAS, 518, 39, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3091

    Wang, A., An, T., Cheng, X., et al. 2023a, MNRAS, 518, 39, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3091

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3091

  73. [73]

    2023b, MNRAS, 525, 6064, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2651

    Wang, A., An, T., Zhang, Y., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 525, 6064, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2651

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2651

  74. [74]

    R., Gallo, L

    Wilkins, D. R., Gallo, L. C., Silva, C. V., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4436, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1814

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1814 2017

  75. [75]

    2022, ApJS, 263, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9ead

    Wu, Q., & Shen, Y. 2022, ApJS, 263, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9ead

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9ead 2022

  76. [76]

    R., & Nixon, C

    Wu, S., Coughlin, E. R., & Nixon, C. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3016, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty971

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty971 2018

  77. [77]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 200, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb775

    Yang, X., Yao, S., Yang, J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 200, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb775

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb775 2020

  78. [78]

    C., et al

    Yang, X., Yao, S., Gallo, L. C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad343c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad343c 2024

  79. [79]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Yao, S., Yang, X., Gu, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 1305, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2651

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2651 2021

  80. [80]

    M., Peterson, B

    Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., Peterson, B. M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf24a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf24a 2021

Showing first 80 references.