pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19431 · v1 · pith:J3CE3WMOnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 💻 cs.RO

Self-assembling Modular Aerial Robot for Versatile Aerial Tasks

Junichiro Sugihara , Masaki Kitagawa , Jinjie Li , Yunong Li , Takuzumi Nishio , Kei Okada , Moju Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 05:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords modular aerial robotsself-assemblyin-flight dockingaerial manipulationreconfigurable systemsmultirotorcooperative robotics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modular aerial units dock themselves in flight and lock together to perform manipulation tasks outdoors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that small, agile multirotor units can fly alone yet join end to end while airborne. Special docking interfaces then use force and torque control to create a gap-free connection that stays stable during motion and outdoor conditions. Once linked, the combined structure can switch shapes and carry out actions such as pushing, pulling, rotating, grasping, and carrying. A reader would care because this removes the usual choice between nimble small drones that struggle with physical work and large stable ones that cannot move easily in tight spaces.

Core claim

Multiple units autonomously dock in flight; once latched, they maintain a zero-clearance interlock by controlling the contact force and torque, enabling reliable aggregation and articulated motion even outdoors. Self-reconfigurability further allows morphological switching between nimble individual flight and collective articulated manipulation while realizing core in-flight manipulation primitives including pushing, pulling, rotating, grasping, and carrying.

What carries the argument

Joint-equipped docking interfaces at both ends of each unit that enable end-to-end self-assembly and apply force and torque control to sustain zero-clearance interlocking after connection.

If this is right

  • Autonomous in-flight docking allows multiple units to form stable chains or structures for cooperative work.
  • Zero-clearance interlock holds during articulated motion and under outdoor conditions.
  • Morphological switching supports both individual agile flight and group-level manipulation.
  • Core aerial primitives such as grasping, carrying, pushing, and rotating become available to the assembled system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same docking approach might extend to other mobile robots that need to reconfigure while moving.
  • Larger numbers of units could produce adjustable aerial platforms for heavy or extended reach tasks.
  • Adding sensors for automatic shape changes could let the system adapt to tasks without external commands.

Load-bearing premise

The docking interfaces and force/torque controllers can achieve and keep a stable zero-clearance connection despite real flight movements and outdoor disturbances.

What would settle it

Outdoor flight tests in which assembled units attempt manipulation tasks while being observed for any separation or loss of interlock stability under wind or motion.

read the original abstract

Multirotor aerial robots excel at maneuvering in three-dimensional space, and recent advances enable nimble navigation in cluttered and confined environments, especially for small airframes. By contrast, platforms built for high-altitude work tend to be larger to deliver high thrust for stable physical interaction with the environment. However, these conflicting design requirements create a long-standing trade-off between nimble navigation and robust aerial manipulation. Here, we present LEGION units, which are reconfigurable modular aerial robots capable of in-flight self-assembly for cooperative manipulation, drawing inspiration from the self-organized collectives formed by ants. Each unit retains nimble maneuverability while joint-equipped docking interfaces at both ends enable end-to-end self-assembly into a flying manipulator. We show that multiple units autonomously dock in flight; once latched, they maintain a zero-clearance interlock by controlling the contact force and torque, enabling reliable aggregation and articulated motion even outdoors. We further show that self-reconfigurability enables morphological switching between nimble individual flight and collective articulated manipulation, while realizing core in-flight manipulation primitives including pushing, pulling, rotating, grasping, and carrying. LEGION's self-organization enables aerial robots, especially in swarms, to shift from passive observers to active participants in their environment, broadening the scope of aerial physical interaction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces LEGION units as reconfigurable modular multirotor aerial robots that autonomously dock in flight to form larger articulated structures. Once latched, contact force and torque control is used to achieve zero-clearance interlocking that supports stable aggregation and manipulation tasks (pushing, pulling, rotating, grasping, carrying) both indoors and outdoors, while allowing morphological switching between nimble single-unit flight and collective operation.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold with supporting quantitative evidence, the work would be significant for aerial robotics by demonstrating a practical route to resolve the long-standing trade-off between small-frame agility and large-frame interaction capability through self-assembly and reconfigurability, extending swarm systems from observation to active physical participation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'once latched, they maintain a zero-clearance interlock by controlling the contact force and torque, enabling reliable aggregation and articulated motion even outdoors' is load-bearing for the robustness and outdoor-operation assertions, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative metrics (force/torque variance, separation-event counts, or closed-loop stability margins) or explicit modeling of coupled multi-body dynamics under disturbances to substantiate controller authority against the skeptic concern.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from explicit mention of the number of units, trial counts, and key performance numbers (e.g., docking success rate, force-tracking RMSE) to allow readers to gauge the strength of the demonstrations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work's significance and for the constructive major comment. We address the point below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the substantiation of the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'once latched, they maintain a zero-clearance interlock by controlling the contact force and torque, enabling reliable aggregation and articulated motion even outdoors' is load-bearing for the robustness and outdoor-operation assertions, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative metrics (force/torque variance, separation-event counts, or closed-loop stability margins) or explicit modeling of coupled multi-body dynamics under disturbances to substantiate controller authority against the skeptic concern.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract claim regarding zero-clearance interlock would be strengthened by explicit quantitative support. The full manuscript reports multiple successful outdoor aggregation and manipulation trials with no observed separations, supported by the force/torque controller. To address the concern directly, the revised version adds quantitative metrics from the experimental data (contact force/torque variance during sustained interlock, separation-event counts of zero across all trials, and closed-loop performance under wind disturbances) along with a concise description of the coupled multi-body model used in the controller. These additions are placed in the results and methods sections without changing the core contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental claims rest on hardware implementation and trials

full rationale

The manuscript describes a modular aerial robot system (LEGION) whose core results are achieved through physical design of joint-equipped docking interfaces, force/torque controllers, and reported flight experiments showing autonomous in-flight docking and zero-clearance interlocking. No derivation chain, predictive equations, or first-principles results are presented that could reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. Central assertions about aggregation, articulated motion, and morphological switching are grounded in experimental outcomes rather than any self-referential mathematical structure, rendering the work self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the feasibility of autonomous in-flight docking and sustained force/torque-controlled interlocking; these are domain assumptions whose validation depends on hardware performance and control implementation details not expanded in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Joint-equipped docking interfaces can achieve and maintain zero-clearance interlock through contact force and torque control during flight
    This premise is required for the claims of reliable aggregation and articulated outdoor motion to hold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5776 in / 1267 out tokens · 65300 ms · 2026-05-20T05:38:47.947076+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Journal of Field Robotics 37(4), 606–641 (2020)

    Bonatti, R., Wang, W., Ho, C., Ahuja, A., Gschwindt, M., Camci, E., Kayacan, E., Choudhury, S., Scherer, S.: Autonomous aerial cinematography in unstructured environments with learned artistic decision-making. Journal of Field Robotics 37(4), 606–641 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Science Robotics7(66), 9742 (2022)

    Tranzatto, M., Miki, T., Dharmadhikari, M., Bernreiter, L., Kulkarni, M., Mas- carich, F., Andersson, O., Khattak, S., Hutter, M., Siegwart, R., Alexis, K.: Cerberus in the darpa subterranean challenge. Science Robotics7(66), 9742 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Au, T.-C.: Contingency formation planning for interactive drone light shows. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 8922–8928 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Mellinger, D., Kumar, V.: Minimum snap trajectory generation and control for quadrotors, 2520–2525 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Science Robotics10(101), 9905 (2025)

    Wang, M., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Gao, Y., Wang, J., Cui, C., Li, Y., Ding, Z., Wang, K., Xu, C., Gao, F.: Unlocking aerobatic potential of quadcopters: Autonomous freestyle flight generation and execution. Science Robotics10(101), 9905 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Science Robotics10(98), 6187 (2025)

    Ren, Y., Zhu, F., Lu, G., Cai, Y., Yin, L., Kong, F., Lin, J., Chen, N., Zhang, F.: Safety-assured high-speed navigation for mavs. Science Robotics10(98), 6187 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2), 1191–1198 (2020) 29

    Arul, S.H., Manocha, D.: Dcad: Decentralized collision avoidance with dynamics constraints for agile quadrotor swarms. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2), 1191–1198 (2020) 29

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(6), 3374–3394 (2022)

    Xu, H., Zhang, Y., Zhou, B., Wang, L., Yao, X., Meng, G., Shen, S.: Omni-swarm: A decentralized omnidirectional visual-inertial-uwb state estimation system for aerial swarms. IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(6), 3374–3394 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Science Robotics 7(66), 5954 (2022)

    Zhou, X., Wen, X., Wang, Z., Gao, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., Yang, T., Lu, H., Cao, Y., Xu, C., Gao, F.: Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild. Science Robotics 7(66), 5954 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics40, 3044–3067 (2024)

    Hanover, D., Loquercio, A., Bauersfeld, L., Romero, A., Penicka, R., Song, Y., Cioffi, G., Kaufmann, E., Scaramuzza, D.: Autonomous drone racing: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics40, 3044–3067 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Nature620, 982–987 (2023)

    Kaufmann, E., Bauersfeld, L., Loquercio, A., M¨ uller, M., Koltun, V., Scaramuzza, D.: Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning. Nature620, 982–987 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(1), 626–645 (2022)

    Ollero, A., Tognon, M., Suarez, A., Lee, D., Franchi, A.: Past, present, and future of aerial robotic manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(1), 626–645 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp

    Mellinger, D., Lindsey, Q., Shomin, M., Kumar, V.: Design, modeling, esti- mation and control for aerial grasping and manipulation. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2668–2673 (2011)

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Science Advances10(19), 6642 (2024)

    Guo, X., Tang, W., Qin, K., Zhong, Y., Xu, H., Qu, Y., Li, Z., Sheng, Q., Gao, Y., Yang, H., Zou, J.: Powerful uav manipulation via bioinspired self-adaptive soft self-contained gripper. Science Advances10(19), 6642 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    npj Robotics2(1), 5 (2024) 30

    Ubellacker, S., Ray, A., Bern, J.M., Strader, J., Carlone, L.: High-speed aerial grasping using a soft drone with onboard perception. npj Robotics2(1), 5 (2024) 30

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 21(3), 41–50 (2014)

    Fumagalli, M., Naldi, R., Macchelli, A., Forte, F., Keemink, A.Q.L., Stramigioli, S., Carloni, R., Marconi, L.: Developing an aerial manipulator prototype: Physi- cal interaction with the environment. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 21(3), 41–50 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine25(4), 12–23 (2018)

    Ollero, A., Heredia, G., Franchi, A., Antonelli, G., Kondak, K., Sanfeliu, A., Viguria, A., Martinez-de Dios, J.R., Pierri, F., Cortes, J., Santamaria-Navarro, A., Trujillo Soto, M.A., Balachandran, R., Andrade-Cetto, J., Rodriguez, A.: The aeroarms project: Aerial robots with advanced manipulation capabilities for inspection and maintenance. IEEE Robotic...

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Nature609(7928), 709–717 (2022)

    Zhang, K., Chermprayong, P., Xiao, F., Tzoumanikas, D., Dams, B., Kay, S., Kocer, B.B., Burns, A., Orr, L., Alhinai, T., Choi, C., Darekar, D.D., Li, W., Hirschmann, S., Soana, V.,et al.: Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots. Nature609(7928), 709–717 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics40, 1242–1260 (2024)

    Wang, M., Chen, Z., Guo, K., Yu, X., Zhang, Y., Guo, L., Wang, W.: Millimeter- level pick and peg-in-hole task achieved by aerial manipulator. IEEE Transactions on Robotics40, 1242–1260 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Nature646(8085), 576–583 (2025)

    Cao, H., Shen, J., Zhang, Y., Fu, Z., Liu, C., Sun, S., Zhao, S.: Proximal coop- erative aerial manipulation with vertically stacked drones. Nature646(8085), 576–583 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research31(11), 1279–1291 (2012) 31

    Kumar, V., Michael, N.: Opportunities and challenges with autonomous micro aerial vehicles. The International Journal of Robotics Research31(11), 1279–1291 (2012) 31

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Zhao, N., Luo, Y., Deng, H., Shen, Y.: The deformable quad-rotor: Design, kine- matics and dynamics characterization, and flight performance validation. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2391–2396 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4(2), 209–216 (2019)

    Falanga, D., Kleber, K., Mintchev, S., Floreano, D., Scaramuzza, D.: The fold- able drone: A morphing quadrotor that can squeeze and fly. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4(2), 209–216 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2), 1602–1609 (2020)

    Zhao, M., Shi, F., Anzai, T., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Online motion planning for deforming maneuvering and manipulation by multilinked aerial robot based on differential kinematics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2), 1602–1609 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Nguyen, H., Dang, T., Alexis, K.: The reconfigurable aerial robotic chain: Mod- eling and control. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5328–5334 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Yang, H., Park, S., Lee, J., Ahn, J., Son, D., Lee, D.: Lasdra: Large-size aerial skeleton system with distributed rotor actuation. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 7017–7023 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research37(9), 1085–1112 (2018)

    Zhao, M., Kawasaki, K., Anzai, T., Chen, X., Noda, S., Shi, F., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Transformable multirotor with two-dimensional multilinks: Modeling, con- trol, and whole-body aerial manipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research37(9), 1085–1112 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2), 4893–4900 32 (2022)

    Zhao, M., Nagato, K., Okada, K., Inaba, M., Nakao, M.: Forceful valve manipu- lation with arbitrary direction by articulated aerial robot equipped with thrust vectoring apparatus. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2), 4893–4900 32 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research42(4-5), 214–248 (2023)

    Zhao, M., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Versatile articulated aerial robot dragon: Aerial manipulation and grasping by vectorable thrust control. The International Journal of Robotics Research42(4-5), 214–248 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics 40, 660–676 (2024)

    Nishio, T., Zhao, M., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Design, control, and motion planning for a root-perching rotor-distributed manipulator. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 40, 660–676 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Oung, R., Picallo Cruz, M., D’Andrea, R.: A parameterized control methodology for a modular flying vehicle, 532–538 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Salda˜ na, D., Gabrich, B., Li, G., Yim, M., Kumar, V.: Modquad: The flying modular structure that self-assembles in midair. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 691–698 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9(8), 6920–6927 (2024)

    Zhang, J., Li, F., Lu, X., Zhang, C., Xin, Y., Zhao, R., Lyu, S.: Design and control of rapid in-air reconfiguration for modular quadrotors with full control- lable degrees of freedom. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9(8), 6920–6927 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Advanced Intelligent Systems5(10), 2300191 (2023)

    Sugihara, J., Nishio, T., Nagato, K., Nakao, M., Zhao, M.: Design, control, and motion strategy of trady: Tilted-rotor-equipped aerial robot with autonomous in-flight assembly and disassembly ability. Advanced Intelligent Systems5(10), 2300191 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1–11 (2024) 33

    Sugihara, J., Zhao, M., Nishio, T., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Beatle—self- reconfigurable aerial robot: Design, control and experimental validation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1–11 (2024) 33

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    IEEE Access13, 96782–96799 (2025)

    Song, Y., Kim, H., Byun, J., Park, K., Kim, M., Lee, S.J.: Aerial dockable mul- tirotor uavs: Design, control, and flight time extension through in-flight battery replacement. IEEE Access13, 96782–96799 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Nature Physics14(7), 683–693 (2018)

    Feinerman, O., Pinkoviezky, I., Gelblum, A., Fonio, E., Gov, N.S.: The physics of cooperative transport in groups of ants. Nature Physics14(7), 683–693 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(49), 15113–15118 (2015)

    Reid, C.R., Lutz, M.J., Powell, S., Kao, A.B., Couzin, I.D., Garnier, S.: Army ants dynamically adjust living bridges in response to a cost–benefit trade-off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(49), 15113–15118 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 44(5), 740–767 (2025)

    Liang, G., Wu, D., Tu, Y., Lam, T.L.: Decoding modular reconfigurable robots: A survey on mechanisms and design. The International Journal of Robotics Research 44(5), 740–767 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Nature Communications15(1), 3647 (2024)

    Zhao, D., Luo, H., Tu, Y., Meng, C., Lam, T.L.: Snail-inspired robotic swarms: a hybrid connector drives collective adaptation in unstructured outdoor environ- ments. Nature Communications15(1), 3647 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Xu, J., Diego D’Antonio, S., Salda˜ na, D.: H-modquad: Modular multi-rotors with 4, 5, and 6 controllable dof. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 190–196 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Huang, R., Tang, S., Cai, Z., Zhao, L.: Robust self-reconfiguration for fault- tolerant control of modular aerial robot systems. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 12614–12620 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ File:Solenopsis xyloni 248007479.jpg

    Solenopsis xyloni 248007479.jpg (2022). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ File:Solenopsis xyloni 248007479.jpg

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    34 https://stock.adobe.com/jp/video/fire-ants-create-raft-out-of-other-ants-to-live- through-flood/384012267

    Fire ants create raft out of other ants to live through flood. 34 https://stock.adobe.com/jp/video/fire-ants-create-raft-out-of-other-ants-to-live- through-flood/384012267

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    https://stock.adobe.com/jp/video/ant-action-standing-ant-bridge-unity-team- concept-team-work-together-red-ant-weaver-ants-oecophylla-smaragdina-action- of-ant-carry-food/420082761

    Ant action standing.Ant bridge unity team,Concept team work together Red ant,Weaver Ants (Oecophylla smaragdina),Action of ant carry food. https://stock.adobe.com/jp/video/ant-action-standing-ant-bridge-unity-team- concept-team-work-together-red-ant-weaver-ants-oecophylla-smaragdina-action- of-ant-carry-food/420082761

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    https://stock.adobe.com/jp/video/red-ant- carrying-food-to-nest/59250838

    Red ant carrying food to nest. https://stock.adobe.com/jp/video/red-ant- carrying-food-to-nest/59250838

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Gabrich, B., Salda˜ na, D., Kumar, V., Yim, M.: A flying gripper based on cuboid modular robots. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 7024–7030 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    AUPQ446699A0, 2000

    Kocijan, F., Underwood, P.J.: Switchable (variable) Permanent Magnet Device. AUPQ446699A0, 2000. https://patents.google.com/patent/AUPQ446699A0

    work page 2000

  49. [49]

    In: 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp

    Lee, T., Leok, M., McClamroch, N.H.: Geometric tracking control of a quadrotor UAV on SE(3). In: 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 5420–5425 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society51, 406–413 (1955)

    Penrose, R.: A generalized inverse for matrices. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society51, 406–413 (1955)

    work page 1955

  51. [51]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(10), 8770–8777 (2024)

    Li, J., Sugihara, J., Zhao, M.: Servo integrated nonlinear model predictive con- trol for overactuated tiltable-quadrotors. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(10), 8770–8777 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Zhang, R., Zhang, D., Mueller, M.W.: Proxfly: Robust control for close proximity 35 quadcopter flight via residual reinforcement learning. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 13683–13689 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Journal of Field Robotics

    Tunney, I., Bass, J., Lussier Desbiens, A.: Friction shock absorbers and reverse thrust for fast multirotor landing on high-speed vehicles. Journal of Field Robotics

    work page

  54. [54]

    In: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    De Luca, A., Mattone, R.: Sensorless robot collision detection and hybrid force/motion control. In: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 999–1004 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    McGraw-Hill, New York (1975)

    Meirovitch, L.: Elements of Vibration Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (1975)

    work page 1975

  56. [56]

    In: 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Kyriakopoulos, K.J., Saridis, G.N.: Minimum jerk path generation. In: 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 364–369 (1988)

    work page 1988

  57. [57]

    Journal of Field Robotics38(7), 933–966 (2021)

    Zhao, M., Anzai, T., Shi, F., Maki, T., Nishio, T., Ito, K., Kuromiya, N., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Versatile multilinked aerial robot with tilted propellers: Design, modeling, control, and state estimation for autonomous flight and manipulation. Journal of Field Robotics38(7), 933–966 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(4), 2053–2073 (2022)

    Xu, W., Cai, Y., He, D., Lin, J., Zhang, F.: Fast-lio2: Fast direct lidar-inertial odometry. IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(4), 2053–2073 (2022)

    work page 2053

  59. [59]

    Mathematical Biosciences15(1), 1–37 (1972)

    Vukobratovi´ c, M., Stepanenko, J.: On the stability of anthropomorphic systems. Mathematical Biosciences15(1), 1–37 (1972)

    work page 1972

  60. [60]

    IEEE Robotics 36 and Automation Letters3(2), 1176–1183 (2018)

    Zhao, M., Anzai, T., Shi, F., Chen, X., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: Design, modeling, and control of an aerial robot dragon: A dual-rotor-embedded multilink robot with the ability of multi-degree-of-freedom aerial transformation. IEEE Robotics 36 and Automation Letters3(2), 1176–1183 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(7), 3923–3930 (2023)

    Zhao, M., Anzai, T., Nishio, T.: Design, modeling, and control of a quadruped robot spidar: Spherically vectorable and distributed rotors assisted air-ground quadruped robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(7), 3923–3930 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Choe, J., Lee, J., Yang, H., Nguyen, H.-N., Lee, D.: Sequential trajectory opti- mization for externally-actuated modular manipulators with joint locking. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 8700–8706 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4, 3402–3409 (2019)

    Salda˜ na, D., Gupta, P.M., Kumar, V.: Design and control of aerial modules for inflight self-disassembly. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4, 3402–3409 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Park, S., Lee, Y., Heo, J., Lee, D.: Pose and posture estimation of aerial skeleton systems for outdoor flying. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 704–710 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Supplementary Methods

    Hameed, S.W., Jie, A.L.J., Imanberdiyev, N., Camci, E., Yau, W.-Y., Feroskhan, M.: Dragonfly drone: A novel tilt-rotor aerial platform with body-morphing capa- bility. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 8642–8648 (2025) 37 Supplementary Information for Self-assembling Modular Aerial Robot for Versatile Aerial Tas...

    work page 2025