pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21755 · v1 · pith:VYXT7JCVnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.quant-gas· hep-ph

Universalities of Defects in Quantum Field Theories

Siwei Zhong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 08:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.quant-gashep-ph
keywords defectsquantum field theorysymmetry principlesrenormalization group flowseffective string theoryimpuritiesquantum gasesextended operators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetry principles suffice to capture the universal dynamics of defects in quantum field theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines defects such as boundaries, impurities, and probe particles embedded in quantum many-body systems. It maintains that symmetry principles alone allow extraction of universal behaviors in their dynamics. The work connects three strands: defect renormalization group flows, descriptions from effective string theory, and the behavior of impurities in atomic quantum gases. A reader would find this useful because it suggests a route to common patterns across high-energy and condensed-matter settings without system-by-system microscopic modeling.

Core claim

Defects are extended operators in quantum field theories whose dynamics display universal features that follow from symmetry principles. The dissertation organizes these features by bringing together defect renormalization group flows, effective string theory, and impurities in atomic quantum gases, showing that symmetry arguments yield consistent predictions across these contexts.

What carries the argument

Symmetry principles applied to extended operators (boundaries, impurities, and probe particles) to determine universal defect dynamics.

If this is right

  • Defect renormalization group flows admit a symmetry-based classification independent of microscopic details.
  • Effective string theory supplies a universal description for the long-distance dynamics of line-like defects.
  • Impurities in ultracold atomic gases exhibit scaling behaviors dictated by the same symmetry constraints that govern defects in relativistic field theories.
  • Renormalization group trajectories for defects can be tracked using only symmetry data, enabling predictions for phase transitions involving extended operators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry framework may extend naturally to defects in non-equilibrium or driven quantum systems.
  • Similar symmetry arguments could organize universal features of defects in gravitational backgrounds or holographic models.
  • Experimental platforms with tunable impurities offer direct tests of the predicted universal ratios or scaling exponents.

Load-bearing premise

Symmetry principles alone are enough to determine universal defect dynamics without system-specific microscopic details or extra dynamical assumptions.

What would settle it

Observation of defect motion or scaling in an atomic quantum gas that cannot be reproduced by any symmetry-based effective description would contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21755 by Siwei Zhong.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: The configuration of the conformal twist defect and the topological duality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: DCFT two-point and three-point functions. The red plane represents the twist [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: The configuration of the anyonic brane ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: IR-stable fixed points associated with bilinear defect deformations in the free [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_2_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5. Figure 2.5: Perturbative phase diagram for O(M)×O(N −M) surface defects in the Wilson– Fisher CFT. Left: cases listed in table 2.1. Middle: cases listed in table 2.2. Right: cases of no fixed point other than the trivial one and the O(N)-symmetric one. 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_2_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.6. Figure 2.6: Crystalline impurities in the square lattice. Left: vertex-centered disclination [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_2_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.7. Figure 2.7: Azimuthal current CJ and energy density CT of the defect without conical singularity (i.e., β = 1). We use blue curves to denote values at the standard fixed point, while orange curves denote those at the alternative fixed points. The dashed part of the orange curve represents where the defect quartic interaction becomes relevant. The red line and point mark the values at the defect conformal manifold. m… view at source ↗
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.8. Figure 2.8: Azimuthal current CJ and conformal weight CT of the defects with conical singularity. From left to right: defects with a conical deficit (β = 1 2 and β = 3 4 ) and defects with a conical excess (β = 3 2 ). −1 ≤ CJ ≤ 1. This is precisely the defect conformal manifold associated with the marginal deformation (2.131). We also note that the Zamolodchikov distance from a generic point on this manifold to the … view at source ↗
Figure 2.9
Figure 2.9. Figure 2.9: Observables in Qi–Wu–Zhang model with crystalline impurities. In this figure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_2_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Confining strings in a probe baryon. The figure shows the spatial plane deter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Topological defect line D on the confining string worldsheet. Left: the NGB field profiles are taken to be discontinuous across the line M1, and the defect action is given by the bilinear coupling between x − i and x + i . Right: local operators transform according to equation (3.46) upon crossing the defect line. The Z2 symmetry transformation rule can be schematically written as (∂tx3, ∂σx3) D −→ (−∂σx… view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Merging the topological defect lines with the baryon junction worldline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_3_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Tree-level scattering amplitudes of massive modes in the closed channel. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p072_3_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: Worldsheet loop diagrams. The black lines denote the propagators of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_3_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Ladder diagrams induced by the defect bilinear deformation. The red line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_4_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Leading Feynman diagrams contributing to the anomalous dimension of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Leading Feynman diagrams contributing to the anomalous dimension of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p090_4_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: Particle density and eigenmode profiles of a giant vortex in a hard-wall trap. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p093_4_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: Particle density and eigenmode profiles of a giant vortex in smooth traps. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p094_4_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Defects are both physically rich objects and powerful tools in modern quantum field theory. They are extended operators, such as boundaries, impurities, and probe particles, embedded in many-body systems. In this dissertation, we study the universal aspects of defect dynamics from the perspective of symmetry principles. We bring together several themes, including defect renormalization group flows, effective string theory, and impurities in atomic quantum gases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. This dissertation examines the universal aspects of defect dynamics in quantum field theories through the lens of symmetry principles. It synthesizes themes including defect renormalization group flows, effective string theory descriptions of defects, and impurities in atomic quantum gases, aiming to identify common universal behaviors across these contexts.

Significance. If the symmetry-based connections are rigorously developed, the work could offer a valuable unifying perspective on extended operators in QFT, bridging high-energy theory with condensed-matter realizations. The synthesis of defect RG flows with effective string theory and atomic impurities has the potential to highlight falsifiable universal predictions, which would be a strength in the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Introduction: The central claim that symmetry principles alone suffice to extract universal dynamics without system-specific microscopic details or additional dynamical assumptions is load-bearing for the entire synthesis. This needs explicit support via at least one concrete derivation or example (e.g., a symmetry-only computation of a defect RG flow) to avoid reducing to a high-level overview.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract is overly broad and lacks any specific result, equation, or example; expanding it with one key universal feature identified in the work would improve accessibility.
  2. Notation for defects (e.g., how boundaries or impurities are denoted across sections) should be standardized early to aid readability.
  3. [Effective String Theory] Ensure the effective string theory section includes clear comparisons to existing literature on defect strings to strengthen the synthesis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for identifying a point that strengthens the presentation of our central thesis. We address the major comment below and will incorporate revisions to make the symmetry-based arguments more explicit from the outset.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction] Introduction: The central claim that symmetry principles alone suffice to extract universal dynamics without system-specific microscopic details or additional dynamical assumptions is load-bearing for the entire synthesis. This needs explicit support via at least one concrete derivation or example (e.g., a symmetry-only computation of a defect RG flow) to avoid reducing to a high-level overview.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, self-contained example in the introduction would better anchor the claim. While Chapters 2 and 3 already contain detailed symmetry-only derivations (for instance, the determination of the defect beta function in a 2d CFT with a line defect using only the preserved global symmetry and the defect OPE coefficients, without reference to the ultraviolet lattice regularization), these appear after the introductory overview. We will revise the introduction to include a concise, self-contained illustration: a symmetry-constrained computation of the RG flow for a codimension-1 defect in the 3d Ising model, showing how the defect coupling runs to a fixed point determined solely by the unbroken Z2 symmetry and the defect fusion rules. This addition will be kept brief (approximately one page) and will not alter the overall structure or length of the dissertation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript is presented as a dissertation synthesizing universal aspects of defect dynamics via symmetry principles across defect RG flows, effective string theory, and atomic impurities. No specific equations, derivations, quantitative predictions, or load-bearing steps are exhibited in the available text that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. The central claim is a broad overview and unification of themes rather than a closed derivation loop, rendering the work self-contained as a synthesis without circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the symmetry-principles approach is treated as background without further breakdown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5574 in / 996 out tokens · 56113 ms · 2026-05-22T08:24:10.540798+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

216 extracted references · 216 canonical work pages · 96 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015) 172, [arXiv:1412.5148]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman,Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,arXiv:2209.07471

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    Shao and S

    S.-H. Shao and S. Zhong,Where non-invertible symmetries end: twist defects for electromagnetic duality,JHEP01(2026) 118, [arXiv:2509.21279]

    work page arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Raviv-Moshe and S

    A. Raviv-Moshe and S. Zhong,Phases of surface defects in Scalar Field Theories, JHEP08(2023) 143, [arXiv:2305.11370]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Barkeshli, C

    M. Barkeshli, C. Fechisin, Z. Komargodski, and S. Zhong,Disclinations, Dislocations, and Emanant Flux at Dirac Criticality,Phys. Rev. X16(2026), no. 1 011017, [arXiv:2501.13866]

    work page arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Komargodski and S

    Z. Komargodski and S. Zhong,Baryon junction and string interactions,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024), no. 5 056018, [arXiv:2405.12005]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Lou and S

    X. Lou and S. Zhong,Baryon Junction and String Interactions: Part II, arXiv:2602.17771

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Raviv-Moshe and S

    A. Raviv-Moshe and S. Zhong,Impurities in Schr¨ odinger field theories and s-wave resonance,JHEP09(2025) 134, [arXiv:2411.04040]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and S. Zhong,Chiral modes of giant superfluid vortices, Phys. Rev. B110(2024), no. 14 144514, [arXiv:2312.06095]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    A Constraint on Defect and Boundary Renormalization Group Flows

    K. Jensen and A. O’Bannon,Constraint on Defect and Boundary Renormalization Group Flows,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016), no. 9 091601, [arXiv:1509.02160]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and A. Raviv-Moshe,Renormalization Group Flows on Line Defects,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), no. 2 021603, [arXiv:2108.01117]. 88

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Shachar, R

    T. Shachar, R. Sinha, and M. Smolkin,RG flows on two-dimensional spherical defects,SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 6 240, [arXiv:2212.08081]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys. 121(1989) 351–399

    work page 1989

  14. [14]

    Elitzur, G

    S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg,Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,Nucl. Phys. B326(1989) 108–134

    work page 1989

  15. [15]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee,A Classification of Abelian quantum Hall states and matrix formulation of topological fluids,Phys. Rev. B46(1992) 2290–2301

    work page 1992

  16. [16]

    Wen,Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects,Int

    X.-G. Wen,Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B6(1992) 1711–1762

    work page 1992

  17. [17]

    Diatlyk, H

    O. Diatlyk, H. Khanchandani, F. K. Popov, and Y. Wang,Effective Field Theory of Conformal Boundaries,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 26 261601, [arXiv:2406.01550]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Verresen, U

    R. Verresen, U. Borla, A. Vishwanath, S. Moroz, and R. Thorngren,Higgs Condensates are Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases: I. Discrete Symmetries, arXiv:2211.01376

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    K. T. K. Chung, R. Flores-Calder´ on, R. C. Torres, P. Ribeiro, S. Moroz, and P. A. McClarty,Higgs phases and boundary criticality,SciPost Phys.19(2025), no. 4 105, [arXiv:2404.17001]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Gell-Mann and F

    M. Gell-Mann and F. E. Low,Quantum electrodynamics at small distances,Phys. Rev.95(1954) 1300–1312

    work page 1954

  21. [21]

    K. G. Wilson,Renormalization group and critical phenomena. 1. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture,Phys. Rev. B4(1971) 3174–3183

    work page 1971

  22. [22]

    K. G. Wilson,Renormalization group and critical phenomena. 2. Phase space cell analysis of critical behavior,Phys. Rev. B4(1971) 3184–3205

    work page 1971

  23. [23]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek,Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 1343–1346

    work page 1973

  24. [24]

    H. D. Politzer,Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 1346–1349

    work page 1973

  25. [25]

    Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians,Nucl

    J. Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians,Nucl. Phys. B231(1984) 269–295. 89

    work page 1984

  26. [26]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730–732

    work page 1986

  27. [27]

    Scale and conformal invariance in field theory: a physical counterexample

    V. Riva and J. L. Cardy,Scale and conformal invariance in field theory: A Physical counterexample,Phys. Lett. B622(2005) 339–342, [hep-th/0504197]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  28. [28]

    What Maxwell Theory in D<>4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance

    S. El-Showk, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov,What Maxwell Theory in D<>4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance,Nucl. Phys. B848(2011) 578–593, [arXiv:1101.5385]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    Tutorial on Scale and Conformal Symmetries in Diverse Dimensions

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi,Tutorial on Scale and Conformal Symmetries in Diverse Dimensions,J. Phys. A44(2011) 223001, [arXiv:1101.4886]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    Gimenez-Grau, Y

    A. Gimenez-Grau, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov,Scale without conformal invariance in dipolar ferromagnets,Phys. Rev. B110(2024), no. 2 024421, [arXiv:2309.02514]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    TASI Lectures on the Conformal Bootstrap

    D. Simmons-Duffin,The Conformal Bootstrap, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 1–74, 2017.arXiv:1602.07982

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Rychkov,EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D>= 3 Dimensions

    S. Rychkov,EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D>= 3 Dimensions. SpringerBriefs in Physics. 1, 2016

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    A. M. Polyakov,Non-Hamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.66(1974), no. 1 23–42

    work page 1974

  34. [34]

    Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

    R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni, and A. Vichi,Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT,JHEP12(2008) 031, [arXiv:0807.0004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 025022, [arXiv:1203.6064]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin

    Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov,Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin,JHEP 11(2013) 140, [arXiv:1212.4103]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin,The Analytic Bootstrap and AdS Superhorizon Locality,JHEP12(2013) 004, [arXiv:1212.3616]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn,Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B455(1995) 522–576, [cond-mat/9505127]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  39. [39]

    The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFT_d

    P. Liendo, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees,The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFTd,JHEP07(2013) 113, [arXiv:1210.4258]. 90

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Gliozzi, P

    F. Gliozzi, P. Liendo, M. Meineri, and A. Rago,Boundary and Interface CFTs from the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP05(2015) 036, [arXiv:1502.07217]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 093 (2021)]

    work page arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Defects in conformal field theory

    M. Bill` o, V. Gon¸ calves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri,Defects in conformal field theory, JHEP04(2016) 091, [arXiv:1601.02883]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    Radial coordinates for defect CFTs

    E. Lauria, M. Meineri, and E. Trevisani,Radial coordinates for defect CFTs,JHEP 11(2018) 148, [arXiv:1712.07668]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Lauria, M

    E. Lauria, M. Meineri, and E. Trevisani,Spinning operators and defects in conformal field theory,JHEP08(2019) 066, [arXiv:1807.02522]

    work page arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    A Lorentzian inversion formula for defect CFT

    P. Liendo, Y. Linke, and V. Schomerus,A Lorentzian inversion formula for defect CFT,JHEP08(2020) 163, [arXiv:1903.05222]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Lauria, P

    E. Lauria, P. Liendo, B. C. Van Rees, and X. Zhao,Line and surface defects for the free scalar field,JHEP01(2021) 060, [arXiv:2005.02413]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    C. P. Herzog and A. Shrestha,Two point functions in defect CFTs,JHEP04(2021) 226, [arXiv:2010.04995]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Chalabi, C

    A. Chalabi, C. P. Herzog, A. O’Bannon, B. Robinson, and J. Sisti,Weyl anomalies of four dimensional conformal boundaries and defects,JHEP02(2022) 166, [arXiv:2111.14713]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Is boundary conformal in CFT?

    Y. Nakayama,Is boundary conformal in CFT?,Phys. Rev. D87(2013), no. 4 046005, [arXiv:1210.6439]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland, and S. Rychkov,Spinning Conformal Correlators,JHEP11(2011) 071, [arXiv:1107.3554]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn,Energy momentum tensor in conformal field theories near a boundary,Nucl. Phys. B406(1993) 655–680, [hep-th/9302068]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  51. [51]

    Antinucci, C

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi,Topological constraints on defect dynamics,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 6 065025, [arXiv:2412.18652]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    M. A. Metlitski,Boundary criticality of the O(N) model in d = 3 critically revisited, SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 4 131, [arXiv:2009.05119]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and M. Mezei,Localized magnetic field in the O(N) model,JHEP02(2022) 134, [arXiv:2112.10634]. 91

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Drukker, Z

    N. Drukker, Z. Kong, and G. Sakkas,Broken Global Symmetries and Defect Conformal Manifolds,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 20 201603, [arXiv:2203.17157]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Bartlett-Tisdall, D

    S. Bartlett-Tisdall, D. Ge, and C. P. Herzog,How to get an interacting conformal line defect for free theories,arXiv:2510.02871

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    C. P. Herzog and A. Shrestha,Conformal surface defects in Maxwell theory are trivial,JHEP08(2022) 282, [arXiv:2202.09180]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Fraser-Taliente, C

    L. Fraser-Taliente, C. P. Herzog, and A. Shrestha,A nonlocal Schwinger model, JHEP06(2025) 252, [arXiv:2412.02514]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023), no. 1 489–542, [arXiv:2204.09025]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible Time-Reversal Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 13 131602, [arXiv:2208.04331]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    P. Niro, K. Roumpedakis, and O. Sela,Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories,JHEP03(2023) 005, [arXiv:2209.11166]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Gauge Theory, Ramification, And The Geometric Langlands Program

    S. Gukov and E. Witten,Gauge Theory, Ramification, And The Geometric Langlands Program,hep-th/0612073

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Rigid Surface Operators

    S. Gukov and E. Witten,Rigid Surface Operators,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.14 (2010), no. 1 87–178, [arXiv:0804.1561]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten,S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13(2009), no. 3 721–896, [arXiv:0807.3720]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [64]

    Abelian duality, walls and boundary conditions in diverse dimensions

    A. Kapustin and M. Tikhonov,Abelian duality, walls and boundary conditions in diverse dimensions,JHEP11(2009) 006, [arXiv:0904.0840]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  65. [65]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 12 125016, [arXiv:2111.01139]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Cordova and K

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori,Quantum duality in electromagnetism and the fine structure constant,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 10 105019, [arXiv:2307.12927]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    S. Kim, O. Sela, and Z. Sun,Higher structure of non-invertible symmetries from Lagrangian descriptions,arXiv:2509.20540. 92

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Line defects in the 3d Ising model

    M. Bill´ o, M. Caselle, D. Gaiotto, F. Gliozzi, M. Meineri, and R. Pellegrini,Line defects in the 3d Ising model,JHEP07(2013) 055, [arXiv:1304.4110]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    Bootstrapping the 3d Ising twist defect

    D. Gaiotto, D. Mazac, and M. F. Paulos,Bootstrapping the 3d Ising twist defect, JHEP03(2014) 100, [arXiv:1310.5078]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Giombi, E

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger, Z. Ji, and H. Khanchandani,Monodromy defects from hyperbolic space,JHEP02(2022) 041, [arXiv:2102.11815]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Bianchi, A

    L. Bianchi, A. Chalabi, V. Proch´ azka, B. Robinson, and J. Sisti,Monodromy defects in free field theories,JHEP08(2021) 013, [arXiv:2104.01220]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Floreanini and R

    R. Floreanini and R. Jackiw,Selfdual Fields as Charge Density Solitons,Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 1873

    work page 1987

  73. [73]

    Sen,Self-dual forms: Action, Hamiltonian and Compactification,J

    A. Sen,Self-dual forms: Action, Hamiltonian and Compactification,J. Phys. A53 (2020), no. 8 084002, [arXiv:1903.12196]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Mkrtchyan,On Covariant Actions for Chiralp−Forms,JHEP12(2019) 076, [arXiv:1908.01789]

    K. Mkrtchyan,On Covariant Actions for Chiralp−Forms,JHEP12(2019) 076, [arXiv:1908.01789]

    work page arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Giombi and B

    S. Giombi and B. Liu,Notes on a surface defect in the O(N) model,JHEP12(2023) 004, [arXiv:2305.11402]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Tr´ epanier,Surface defects in the O(N) model,JHEP09(2023) 074, [arXiv:2305.10486]

    M. Tr´ epanier,Surface defects in the O(N) model,JHEP09(2023) 074, [arXiv:2305.10486]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Y. J. Deng, H. W. J. Blote, and M. P. Nightingale,Surface and bulk transitions in three-dimensional O(n) models,Phys. Rev. E72(2005) 016128–016138, [cond-mat/0504173]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  78. [78]

    F. P. Toldin,Boundary Critical Behavior of the Three-Dimensional Heisenberg Universality Class,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021), no. 13 135701, [arXiv:2012.00039]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Padayasi, A

    J. Padayasi, A. Krishnan, M. A. Metlitski, I. A. Gruzberg, and M. Meineri,The extraordinary boundary transition in the 3d O(N) model via conformal bootstrap, SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 6 190, [arXiv:2111.03071]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Zhou and Y

    Z. Zhou and Y. Zou,Studying the 3d Ising surface CFTs on the fuzzy sphere,SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 1 031, [arXiv:2407.15914]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.