pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22696 · v1 · pith:B4M3NMLXnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph

Dimming of Photon Ring due to Photon-Axion Conversion around Kerr Black Holes

Rahul Dhyani , Sauvik Sen , Indrani Banerjee , Ashmita Chakraborty , Arindam Chatterjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords photon-axion conversionKerr black holesphoton ringaxion massblack hole spindimmingmagnetic fieldsplasma density
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photon-axion conversion in strong gravity dims the photon ring more around rotating black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines photon-axion conversion near Kerr black holes, where gravity traps photons on near-circular paths and lengthens their travel time through ambient magnetic fields. This process reduces the spectral luminosity of the photon ring, with the reduction growing larger as black-hole spin increases because the trapped orbits become more extended. Conversion efficiency rises at higher photon frequencies and depends on axion mass, coupling strength, magnetic-field intensity, and plasma density, proving strongest around supermassive objects. If telescopes resolve the ring at roughly 10^{-5} arcsec in X-rays or gamma rays, the observed dimming would translate directly into upper limits on axion mass and photon coupling. The analysis shows rotating black holes produce noticeably greater dimming than non-rotating ones under the same external conditions.

Core claim

Photon-axion conversion becomes more probable near Kerr black holes because strong gravity confines photons to longer near-circular trajectories in the photon region; the resulting drop in photon spectral luminosity scales with black-hole spin, magnetic-field strength, and coupling constant, and is largest at X-ray and gamma-ray frequencies.

What carries the argument

The photon region (near-circular unstable photon orbits) that extends the effective path length for photon-axion oscillations driven by ambient magnetic fields.

If this is right

  • Rotating black holes produce greater dimming than non-rotating ones for the same external parameters.
  • Conversion efficiency peaks at high frequencies and widens in frequency range when coupling increases or axion mass and plasma density decrease.
  • Dimming amplitude is controlled mainly by magnetic-field strength, photon-axion coupling, and black-hole spin.
  • Detection at sufficient angular resolution would directly constrain axion mass and coupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future high-resolution X-ray or gamma-ray imaging could turn photon-ring observations into a new search channel for light axions.
  • The same path-length enhancement might apply to other light particles that mix with photons in magnetic fields.
  • Numerical modeling of specific black-hole environments could test whether plasma effects suppress or enhance the dimming signal.
  • Comparison of dimming between M87* and Sgr A* would isolate the role of black-hole mass in the conversion process.

Load-bearing premise

Ambient magnetic fields of sufficient strength and coherence exist in the photon region to drive efficient conversion.

What would settle it

Absence of measurable dimming in the photon ring at 10^{-5} arcsec resolution in the X-ray or gamma-ray band around a supermassive black hole such as M87* would indicate that conversion is negligible or that the required magnetic fields are weaker than modeled.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22696 by Arindam Chatterjee, Ashmita Chakraborty, Indrani Banerjee, Rahul Dhyani, Sauvik Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The above figure illustrates the variation of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Density plots showing the continuous variation of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The above figure illustrates a characteristic photon trajectory with impact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The above figure shows the variation of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Variation of dimming fraction with magnetic field strength and photon frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Variation of dimming fraction with magnetic field strength and photon frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The above figure depicts the variation of the dimming fraction with axion mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Variation of dimming fraction with magnetic field strength and electron number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Variation of dimming fraction with magnetic field strength and electron number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Schematic diagram showing the emission from a point represented by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The above figure shows the variation of the relative luminosity of photons and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The above figure shows the variation of the relative luminosity of photons and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The above figure shows the variation of the relative luminosity of photons and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate photon-axion conversion in the vicinity of rotating Kerr black holes where strong gravity traps photons on near-circular trajectories, effectively enhancing the path length. We explore the observable signatures of such a conversion near the photon region. The process, driven by ambient magnetic fields, is significantly more efficient around supermassive black holes such as M87*, since the luminosity of photons increases with the mass of the BH. By numerically evaluating photon path lengths (on which the conversion depends), we analyze how key parameters-photon frequency, axion mass, photon-axion coupling, magnetic field strength, plasma density, and black hole spin-affect the conversion probability and the resultant dimming of photon spectral luminosity. We find that the conversion is most efficient at high frequencies (X-rays and gamma rays), while the frequency window associated with efficient conversion widens with an increase in the photon-axion coupling and a decrease in the electron density and the axion mass. The magnitude of dimming of the photon spectral luminosity depends primarily on the magnetic field, the photon-axion coupling and the BH spin. Our study reveals that rotating black holes generally exhibit enhanced dimming compared to static ones. Thus, if future telescopes achieving a resolution $\sim 10^{-5}$ arcsec in the X-ray/gamma-ray band detect a dimming of the photon spectral luminosity, then they can provide interesting constraints on the axion mass and its coupling with photons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates photon-axion conversion near Kerr black holes, where frame-dragging traps photons on extended near-circular null geodesics, increasing the effective path length for mixing in ambient magnetic fields. Numerical integration of photon trajectories and conversion probabilities is used to study dependencies on frequency, axion mass, coupling g_aγ, B-field strength, plasma density, and spin; the authors report that rotating black holes exhibit enhanced dimming relative to static ones and that future ~10^{-5} arcsec X-ray/gamma-ray observations could constrain axion parameters.

Significance. If realistic B-fields and coherence lengths exist in the photon sphere, the work identifies a spin-dependent dimming channel that could serve as an axion probe with next-generation instruments. The explicit numerical evaluation of trapped geodesics in the Kerr metric and the parameter scan of conversion probabilities constitute a clear methodological contribution. The quantitative predictions remain sensitive to the choice of unanchored B and plasma models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical evaluation and parameter scans] The conversion probability is proportional to the line integral of g_aγ B_⊥ along the photon path; the manuscript treats B-field strength and plasma density as free parameters scanned numerically but provides no derivation or citation of these values from GRMHD simulations or EHT constraints on the photon-ring region. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed percent-level dimming and the spin-enhancement result.
  2. [Results on conversion probability and dimming] The abstract and results state that dimming magnitude depends primarily on B, g_aγ, and spin, yet no error bars, convergence tests on the geodesic integration, or full specification of the plasma and magnetic-field models are reported. This leaves the quantitative dimming predictions vulnerable to modeling choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could explicitly state the integration scheme used for the photon trajectories and the precise ranges scanned for each parameter.
  2. [Results section] A summary table listing the explored parameter space and the resulting conversion probabilities for representative spin values would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional justifications, numerical validations, and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical evaluation and parameter scans] The conversion probability is proportional to the line integral of g_aγ B_⊥ along the photon path; the manuscript treats B-field strength and plasma density as free parameters scanned numerically but provides no derivation or citation of these values from GRMHD simulations or EHT constraints on the photon-ring region. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed percent-level dimming and the spin-enhancement result.

    Authors: We agree that the B-field strength and plasma density are key inputs and that their specific values should be better anchored. Our analysis is designed to explore parametric dependencies rather than to make absolute predictions for a single source. In the revised manuscript we now cite relevant GRMHD simulations and EHT-derived constraints on magnetic-field strengths and electron densities near the photon sphere of M87*-like objects, and we explicitly discuss the range of values adopted and their consistency with existing literature. We also clarify that the reported dimming and spin-enhancement trends hold across the scanned parameter space. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on conversion probability and dimming] The abstract and results state that dimming magnitude depends primarily on B, g_aγ, and spin, yet no error bars, convergence tests on the geodesic integration, or full specification of the plasma and magnetic-field models are reported. This leaves the quantitative dimming predictions vulnerable to modeling choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional numerical documentation is warranted. The revised manuscript now includes a dedicated subsection on the numerical implementation: we report convergence tests with respect to integration step size and radial cutoff for the geodesic solver, and we attach error bars to the dimming curves that reflect residual numerical uncertainty. We also provide a more complete specification of the plasma-density profile (power-law form with chosen normalization) and the magnetic-field model (uniform strength with assumed coherence length), together with a brief sensitivity analysis to these modeling assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard mixing equations and independent geodesic integration

full rationale

The paper evaluates photon-axion conversion probability via the standard mixing equations integrated along null geodesics in the Kerr metric. Photon path lengths are computed directly from the spacetime geometry (frame-dragging increases trapped orbits for nonzero spin), and dimming is obtained by applying the resulting probability to the spectral luminosity. Magnetic field strength, plasma density, axion mass, and coupling are scanned as external parameters rather than fitted to any output quantity. No self-citations underpin the central claim, no uniqueness theorems are invoked, and no ansatz is smuggled in; the qualitative result that rotating black holes show enhanced dimming follows geometrically from longer path lengths and is not equivalent to the inputs by construction. The analysis remains self-contained against external GR and axion-physics benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model inherits standard general-relativistic photon geodesics and axion-photon mixing in magnetized plasma; free parameters are the magnetic-field strength, plasma density, and axion mass, all treated as inputs rather than derived.

free parameters (2)
  • magnetic field strength
    Controls conversion probability; value is assumed rather than measured or derived from first principles.
  • plasma density
    Sets the frequency window for efficient conversion; treated as an adjustable input.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Strong gravity near the photon region traps photons on near-circular trajectories that substantially increase path length.
    Invoked to justify enhanced conversion efficiency; stated in the abstract as the mechanism enabling the effect.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5813 in / 1404 out tokens · 54489 ms · 2026-05-22T04:34:40.321268+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L2 (2019), arXiv:1906.11239 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L3 (2019), arXiv:1906.11240 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L4 (2019), arXiv:1906.11241 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L5 (2019), arXiv:1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  8. [8]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D16, 1791 (1977)

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  10. [10]

    Wilczek, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    work page 1978

  11. [11]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, JHEP (06), 051, arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept.643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Freese, J

    K. Freese, J. A. Frieman, and A. V. Olinto, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3233 (1990)

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    J. E. Kim, H. P. Nilles, and M. Peloso, JCAP (01), 005, arXiv:hep-ph/0409138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Dimopoulos, S

    S. Dimopoulos, S. Kachru, J. McGreevy, and J. G. Wacker, JCAP (08), 003, arXiv:hep- th/0507205

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Physics Letters B120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  18. [18]

    Sikivie, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1156 (1982)

    work page 1982

  19. [19]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, Physics Letters B120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  20. [20]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D95, 043541 (2017), arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Chadha-Day, J

    F. Chadha-Day, J. Ellis, and D. J. E. Marsh, Sci. Adv.8, abj3618 (2022), arXiv:2105.01406 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins, and I. Waga, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2077 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9505060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2077

  23. [23]

    String or M theory axion as a quintessence

    K. Choi, Phys. Rev. D62, 043509 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9902292

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  24. [24]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0603057

    work page arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    Maiani, R

    L. Maiani, R. Petronzio, and E. Zavattini, Physics Letters B175, 359 (1986)

    work page 1986

  26. [26]

    Raffelt and L

    G. Raffelt and L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D37, 1237 (1988)

    work page 1988

  27. [27]

    Sikivie, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1415 (1983)

    work page 1983

  28. [28]

    Cameron, G

    R. Cameron, G. Cantatore, A. C. Melissinos, G. Ruoso, Y. Semertzidis, H. J. Halama, D. M. Lazarus, A. G. Prodell, F. Nezrick, C. Rizzo, and E. Zavattini, Phys. Rev. D47, 3707 (1993)

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    The Tokyo Axion Helioscope Experiment

    M. Minowa, S. Moriyama, Y. Inoue, T. Namba, Y. Takasu, and A. Yamamoto, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.72, 171 (1999), arXiv:hep-ex/9806015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  30. [30]

    First results from the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST)

    K. Zioutas et al. (CAST), Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 121301 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0411033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Altenm¨ ulleret al

    K. Altenm¨ ulleret al. (CAST), Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 221005 (2024), arXiv:2406.16840 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    A. S. Chou, W. C. Wester, III, A. Baumbaugh, H. R. Gustafson, Y. Irizarry-Valle, P. O. Mazur, J. H. Steffen, R. Tomlin, X. Yang, and J. Yoo (GammeV (T-969)), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080402 (2008), arXiv:0710.3783 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Ehret (ALPS), in 6th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs (2010) pp

    K. Ehret (ALPS), in 6th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs (2010) pp. 53–56

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Microwave cavity light shining through a wall optimization and experiment

    R. Povey, J. Hartnett, and M. Tobar, Phys. Rev. D82, 052003 (2010), arXiv:1003.0964 [hep- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  35. [35]

    Search for weakly interacting sub-eV particles with the OSQAR laser-based experiment: results and perspectives

    P. Pugnat et al. (OSQAR), Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3027 (2014), arXiv:1306.0443 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    New Exclusion Limits for the Search of Scalar and Pseudoscalar Axion-Like Particles from "Light Shining Through a Wall"

    R. Ballou et al. (OSQAR), Phys. Rev. D92, 092002 (2015), arXiv:1506.08082 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    D. C. Brotherton et al. (ALPS II), - (2025), arXiv:2512.14110 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    S. J. Asztalos, G. Carosi, C. Hagmann, D. Kinion, K. van Bibber, M. Hotz, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Hoskins, J. Hwang, P. Sikivie, D. B. Tanner, R. Bradley, J. Clarke, and ADMX Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 041301 (2010), arXiv:0910.5914 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    J. L. Ouellet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 121802 (2019), arXiv:1810.12257 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Crisosto, P

    N. Crisosto, P. Sikivie, N. S. Sullivan, D. B. Tanner, J. Yang, and G. Rybka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 241101 (2020), arXiv:1911.05772 [astro-ph.CO]. 46

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    A. V. Gramolin, D. Aybas, D. Johnson, J. Adam, and A. O. Sushkov, Nature Phys.17, 79 (2021), arXiv:2003.03348 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    C. P. Salemi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 081801 (2021), arXiv:2102.06722 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Aybas et al., Phys

    D. Aybas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 141802 (2021), arXiv:2101.01241 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    B. T. McAllister, A. Quiskamp, C. A. J. O’Hare, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar (ORGAN), Annalen Phys.536, 2200622 (2024), arXiv:2212.01971 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Di Vora et al

    R. Di Vora et al. (QUAX), Phys. Rev. D108, 062005 (2023), arXiv:2304.07505 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Egge et al

    J. Egge et al. (MADMAX), Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 151004 (2025), arXiv:2408.02368 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Rettaroli et al

    A. Rettaroli et al. (QUAX), Phys. Rev. D110, 022008 (2024), arXiv:2402.19063 [physics.ins- det]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    A. P. Quiskamp, G. R. Flower, S. Samuels, B. T. McAllister, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Gory- achev, and M. E. Tobar (ORGAN), Phys. Rev. D111, 095007 (2025), arXiv:2407.18586 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Carosi et al

    G. Carosi et al. (ADMX), Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 191001 (2025), arXiv:2504.07279 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Evidence for a new light spin-zero boson from cosmological gamma-ray propagation?

    A. De Angelis, M. Roncadelli, and O. Mansutti, Phys. Rev. D76, 121301 (2007), arXiv:0707.4312 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    The Milky Way as a Kiloparsec-Scale Axionscope

    M. Simet, D. Hooper, and P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. D77, 063001 (2008), arXiv:0712.2825 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  52. [52]

    M. A. S´ anchez-Conde, D. Paneque, E. Bloom, F. Prada, and A. Dom´ ınguez, Phys. Rev. D 79, 123511 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Stochastic conversions of TeV photons into axion-like particles in extragalactic magnetic fields

    A. Mirizzi and D. Montanino, JCAP (12), 004, arXiv:0911.0015 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    First lower limits on the photon-axion-like particle coupling from very high energy gamma-ray observation

    M. Meyer, D. Horns, and M. Raue, Phys. Rev. D87, 035027 (2013), arXiv:1302.1208 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [55]

    Galanti, L

    G. Galanti, L. Nava, M. Roncadelli, F. Tavecchio, and G. Bonnoli, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 251001 (2023), arXiv:2210.05659 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    S. V. Troitsky, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.116, 745 (2022), arXiv:2210.09250 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Baktash, D

    A. Baktash, D. Horns, and M. Meyer, - (2022), arXiv:2210.07172 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Lin and T

    W. Lin and T. T. Yanagida, Chin. Phys. Lett.40, 069801 (2023), arXiv:2210.08841 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    M. M. Gonzalez, D. A. Rojas, A. Pratts, S. Hernandez-Cadena, N. Fraija, R. Alfaro, Y. P. Araujo, and J. A. Montes, Astrophys. J.944, 178 (2023), arXiv:2210.15857 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Nakagawa, F

    S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi, M. Yamada, and W. Yin, Phys. Lett. B839, 137824 (2023), 47 arXiv:2210.10022 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Carenza and M

    P. Carenza and M. C. D. Marsh, - (2022), arXiv:2211.02010 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Galanti, M

    G. Galanti, M. Roncadelli, and F. Tavecchio, - (2022), arXiv:2211.06935 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Yanagida and M

    T. Yanagida and M. Yoshimura, Physics Letters B202, 301 (1988)

    work page 1988

  64. [64]

    Constraints on primordial magnetic fields from CMB distortions in the axiverse

    H. Tashiro, J. Silk, and D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rev. D88, 125024 (2013), arXiv:1308.0314 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    Constraining resonant photon-axion conversions in the Early Universe

    A. Mirizzi, J. Redondo, and G. Sigl, JCAP (08), 001, arXiv:0905.4865 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Detecting Axion-Like Particles With Gamma Ray Telescopes

    D. Hooper and P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 231102 (2007), arXiv:0706.3203 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  67. [67]

    K. A. Hochmuth and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D76, 123011 (2007), arXiv:0708.1144 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  68. [68]

    Axion-Like Particles, Cosmic Magnetic Fields and Gamma-Ray Astrophysics

    A. De Angelis, O. Mansutti, and M. Roncadelli, Phys. Lett. B659, 847 (2008), arXiv:0707.2695 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Constraints on axionlike particles with H.E.S.S. from the irregularity of the PKS 2155-304 energy spectrum

    A. Abramowski et al. (H.E.S.S.), Phys. Rev. D88, 102003 (2013), arXiv:1311.3148 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  70. [70]

    Search for Spectral Irregularities due to Photon-Axionlike-Particle Oscillations With the Fermi Large Area Telescope

    M. Ajello et al. (Fermi-LAT), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 161101 (2016), arXiv:1603.06978 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    M. C. D. Marsh, H. R. Russell, A. C. Fabian, B. P. McNamara, P. Nulsen, and C. S. Reynolds, JCAP (12), 036, arXiv:1703.07354 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    New Bounds on Axion-Like Particles From the Fermi Large Area Telescope observation of PKS $2155-304$

    C. Zhang, Y.-F. Liang, S. Li, N.-H. Liao, L. Feng, Q. Yuan, Y.-Z. Fan, and Z.-Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. D97, 063009 (2018), arXiv:1802.08420 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    C. S. Reynolds, M. C. D. Marsh, H. R. Russell, A. C. Fabian, R. Smith, F. Tombesi, and S. Veilleux, Astrophys. J.890, 59 (2020), arXiv:1907.05475 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Noordhuis, A

    D. Noordhuis, A. Prabhu, S. J. Witte, A. Y. Chen, F. Cruz, and C. Weniger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111004 (2023), arXiv:2209.09917 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    M. J. Dolan, F. J. Hiskens, and R. R. Volkas, JCAP (10), 096, arXiv:2207.03102 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Dessert, D

    C. Dessert, D. Dunsky, and B. R. Safdi, Phys. Rev. D105, 103034 (2022), arXiv:2203.04319 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Nomura, K

    K. Nomura, K. Saito, and J. Soda, Phys. Rev. D107, 123505 (2023), arXiv:2212.03020 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    S. Roy, P. Sarkar, S. Sau, and S. SenGupta, JCAP (11), 099, arXiv:2310.05908 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Hazarika, P

    A. Hazarika, P. Mahapatra, and S. Sau, Phys. Rev. D111, 044063 (2025), arXiv:2409.09802 [gr-qc]. 48

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.910, L13 (2021), arXiv:2105.01173 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.