pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25109 · v1 · pith:CWJ5ETE5new · submitted 2026-05-24 · 💻 cs.RO

Soft Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Robotics: A Motion-Based Review of Actuation Mechanisms and Performance Trade-offs

Mohammed Abboodi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords soft pneumatic actuatorsmotion classificationperformance trade-offssoft roboticsactuation mechanismsbending actuatorslinear actuatorstwisting actuators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Soft pneumatic actuator motion and performance are determined by chamber shape, reinforcements, folds, and constraints rather than pressure input alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The review organizes soft pneumatic actuators into four motion classes—linear, bending, twisting, and omnidirectional—and shows how specific structural choices such as chamber arrangement, fiber orientation, and asymmetry control the deformation path. It analyzes how those choices shape force output, air consumption, repeatability, durability, and ease of integration with robotic systems. A reader would care because the approach explains why actuators that produce similar motions can still differ sharply in practical requirements and suitability for wearable or biomedical uses. The paper stresses that fair comparisons across studies require accounting for differences in size, loading, supply, and hysteresis.

Core claim

By grouping actuators according to the motion they produce, the structural features that set the deformation path—braid angle, fold geometry, fiber orientation, chamber arrangement, asymmetry, and internal constraint layers—can be linked directly to differences in motion output, force generation, air demand, repeatability, durability, fabrication difficulty, and robotic integration. This classification also identifies the experimental conditions, including pressure, loading, actuator size, pneumatic supply, and hysteresis, that must be considered when selecting or comparing designs.

What carries the argument

Motion-class classification (linear, bending, twisting, omnidirectional) that maps design features like chamber shape and reinforcement placement to performance trade-offs.

If this is right

  • Designers can select an actuator motion class first, then tune chamber and reinforcement details to meet specific force or efficiency targets.
  • Trade-off maps for air demand and durability become usable for choosing between compact wearable systems and higher-force mobile robots.
  • Integration challenges such as hysteresis and repeatability can be anticipated from the structural asymmetry and constraint choices.
  • Priorities for fabrication simplicity shift depending on whether linear extension or omnidirectional bending is required.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standardized test protocols could be developed around the motion classes to reduce the comparability problem noted in the review.
  • The same structural-feature lens might apply to hybrid actuators that combine two motion classes in one body.
  • Scaling laws for actuator size could be tested by holding motion class constant while varying chamber dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

That published studies contain sufficiently comparable data on design features and performance metrics to allow cross-study analysis despite differences in experimental conditions such as pressure, size, and loading.

What would settle it

A controlled replication of several reviewed actuator designs under matched pressure, size, and loading conditions that finds no consistent link between the listed structural features and the reported performance differences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25109 by Mohammed Abboodi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Figure1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Figure2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Figure3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Figure4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Soft pneumatic actuators are widely used in soft robotics because they can produce large motions while remaining compliant enough to interact safely with objects, environments, and the human body. However, their performance is not solely determined by pressure. Instead, the response depends on the way the actuator is built, including the shape of its chambers, the placement of reinforcements, the use of folds, material stiffness, and the constraints that guide its deformation. As the literature has expanded, it has become more difficult to determine which mechanism is most suitable for a given application and which reported results can be compared across studies. This review examines soft pneumatic actuators according to the design strategies used to generate four motion classes: linear, bending, twisting, and omnidirectional actuation. For each class, it analyzes the structural features that define the deformation path, including braid angle, fold geometry, fiber orientation, chamber arrangement, structural asymmetry, and internal constraint layers. It then discusses how the design choice affect motion output, force generation, air demand, repeatability, durability, fabrication difficulty, and robotic integration. The review further identifies key conditions that must be considered when selecting or comparing actuators, including pressure, loading condition, actuator size, pneumatic supply, and hysteresis This approach helps explain why actuators with similar motion outputs may differ substantially in design requirements, pneumatic demand, and practical suitability. It also highlights the design priorities needed for compact, efficient, repeatable, and deployable soft pneumatic systems in wearable, biomedical, and mobile robotic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review that classifies soft pneumatic actuators according to four motion classes (linear, bending, twisting, omnidirectional). For each class it examines structural features (chamber shape, reinforcement placement, folds, material stiffness, constraints, braid angle, fiber orientation, asymmetry) and links them to performance metrics (motion output, force, air demand, repeatability, durability, fabrication difficulty, integration). It also flags experimental conditions (pressure, loading, size, supply, hysteresis) that must be considered when comparing results across studies.

Significance. If the synthesis is valid, the motion-based taxonomy supplies a practical organizing framework for the expanding SPA literature, clarifying how design choices produce different trade-offs and helping researchers select actuators for wearable, biomedical, and mobile applications where compliance and safe interaction matter.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and review structure] Abstract and review structure: the central trade-off synthesis requires that performance differences can be attributed to the listed structural features rather than uncontrolled variables. The abstract itself notes mismatches in pressure, loading, size, supply, and hysteresis, yet the per-motion-class analysis proceeds without evidence of systematic normalization, standardized benchmarks, or quantitative meta-analysis to support cross-study attribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the review's structure and the challenges of attributing performance differences across heterogeneous studies. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and review structure] Abstract and review structure: the central trade-off synthesis requires that performance differences can be attributed to the listed structural features rather than uncontrolled variables. The abstract itself notes mismatches in pressure, loading, size, supply, and hysteresis, yet the per-motion-class analysis proceeds without evidence of systematic normalization, standardized benchmarks, or quantitative meta-analysis to support cross-study attribution.

    Authors: We agree that the SPA literature is heterogeneous and that uncontrolled variables limit causal attribution. The review is explicitly framed as a qualitative synthesis of reported design-performance relationships drawn from individual studies, not a quantitative meta-analysis. We flag the confounding factors in the abstract and body text precisely to caution against over-interpretation. Where possible, we reference intra-study comparisons that hold experimental conditions relatively constant while varying structural features. A dedicated limitations subsection will be added to the conclusions to further emphasize the absence of normalization and to recommend standardized benchmarks for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: literature review with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

This is a review paper that synthesizes existing literature on soft pneumatic actuators by classifying them according to motion types (linear, bending, twisting, omnidirectional) and discussing structural features and performance metrics drawn from cited external studies. No equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or new derivations are present that could reduce to the paper's own inputs. The patterns of self-definitional claims, fitted inputs called predictions, self-citation load-bearing, uniqueness imported from authors, ansatz smuggled via citation, or renaming known results do not apply. While the review acknowledges variability in experimental conditions across studies, this is a standard limitation of qualitative synthesis and does not create circularity under the specified criteria. The central claim rests on external literature rather than internal self-reference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a literature review paper with no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5797 in / 1257 out tokens · 33709 ms · 2026-06-29T23:46:14.673128+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Design, fabrication and control of soft robots,

    D. Rus and M. T. Tolley, “Design, fabrication and control of soft robots,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 467–475, May 2015, doi: 10.1038/nature14543

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14543 2015

  2. [2]

    Use the Force: Review of High-Rate Actuation of Shape Memory Alloys,

    A. Dana, S. Vollach, and D. Shilo, “Use the Force: Review of High-Rate Actuation of Shape Memory Alloys,” Actuators, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 140, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/act10070140

    work page doi:10.3390/act10070140 2021

  3. [3]

    Active cooling of twisted coiled actuators via fabric air channels,

    A. Lizotte and A. L. Trejos, “Active cooling of twisted coiled actuators via fabric air channels,” Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, vol. 3, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1016355

    work page doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.1016355 2022

  4. [4]

    Dielectric elastomer actuators,

    E. Hajiesmaili and D. R. Clarke, “Dielectric elastomer actuators,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 129, no. 15, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0043959

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0043959 2021

  5. [5]

    Cable driven exoskeleton for upper-limb rehabilitation: A design review,

    J. D. Sanjuan et al., “Cable driven exoskeleton for upper-limb rehabilitation: A design review,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 126, p. 103445, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103445

    work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2020.103445 2020

  6. [6]

    A survey on soft lower limb cable-driven wearable robots without rigid links and joints,

    A. Mahmoudi Khomami and F. Najafi, “A survey on soft lower limb cable-driven wearable robots without rigid links and joints,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 144, p. 103846, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2021.103846

    work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2021.103846 2021

  7. [7]

    A review of soft wearable robots that provide active assistance: Trends, common actuation methods, fabrication, and applications,

    C. Thalman and P. Artemiadis, “A review of soft wearable robots that provide active assistance: Trends, common actuation methods, fabrication, and applications,” Wearable Technologies, vol. 1, p. e3, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1017/wtc.2020.4

    work page doi:10.1017/wtc.2020.4 2020

  8. [8]

    Soft Pneumatic Actuators: A Review of Design, Fabrication, Modeling, Sensing, Control and Applications,

    M. S. Xavier et al., “Soft Pneumatic Actuators: A Review of Design, Fabrication, Modeling, Sensing, Control and Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 59442–59485, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179589

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2022.3179589 2022

  9. [9]

    Design, fabrication, and measurement of pneumatic soft actuators: A review,

    J. Liu, Q. Cheng, T. Sun, Z. Liu, J. Xu, and Y. Wang, “Design, fabrication, and measurement of pneumatic soft actuators: A review,” Sens. Actuators A Phys., vol. 398, p. 117326, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2025.117326

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2025.117326 2026

  10. [10]

    MECHANICS OF BELLOWS: A CRITICAL SURVEY,

    J. F. Wilson, “MECHANICS OF BELLOWS: A CRITICAL SURVEY,” 1984

    1984

  11. [11]

    A Review on the Development of Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuators: Force Model and Application,

    B. Kalita, A. Leonessa, and S. K. Dwivedy, “A Review on the Development of Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuators: Force Model and Application,” Actuators, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 288, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/act11100288

    work page doi:10.3390/act11100288 2022

  12. [12]

    Advances in Fabric-Based Pneumatic Soft Actuators for Flexible Robotics: Design and Applications,

    Y. Chai, Y. Qin, Z. Xu, X. Zheng, and H. Jia, “Advances in Fabric-Based Pneumatic Soft Actuators for Flexible Robotics: Design and Applications,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 12, p. 3665, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25123665

    work page doi:10.3390/s25123665 2025

  13. [13]

    Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles,

    Ching-Ping Chou and B. Hannaford, “Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 90–102, 1996, doi: 10.1109/70.481753

    work page doi:10.1109/70.481753 1996

  14. [14]

    Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: A review,

    B. Tondu, “Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: A review,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 225–253, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1045389X11435435

    work page doi:10.1177/1045389x11435435 2012

  15. [15]

    Modeling and control of McKibben artificial muscle robot actuators,

    B. Tondu and P. Lopez, “Modeling and control of McKibben artificial muscle robot actuators,” IEEE Control Syst., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 15–38, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1109/37.833638

    work page doi:10.1109/37.833638 2000

  16. [16]

    A Survey on applications of Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,

    G. Andrikopoulos, G. Nikolakopoulos, and S. Manesis, “A Survey on applications of Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” in 2011 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED), IEEE, Jun. 2011, pp. 1439–1446. doi: 10.1109/MED.2011.5982983

    work page doi:10.1109/med.2011.5982983 2011

  17. [17]

    The Concept and Design of Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,

    F. Daerden and D. Lefeber, “The Concept and Design of Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” International Journal of Fluid Power, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 41–50, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1080/14399776.2001.10781119

    work page doi:10.1080/14399776.2001.10781119 2001

  18. [18]

    A Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Manufactured Out of Self-Healing Polymers That Can Repair Macroscopic Damages,

    S. Terryn, J. Brancart, D. Lefeber, G. Van Assche, and B. Vanderborght, “A Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Manufactured Out of Self-Healing Polymers That Can Repair Macroscopic Damages,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 16–21, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2017.2724140

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2017.2724140 2018

  19. [19]

    Pleated pneumatic artificial muscles: actuators for automation and robotics,

    F. Daerden, D. Lefeber, B. Verrelst, and R. Van Ham, “Pleated pneumatic artificial muscles: actuators for automation and robotics,” in 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8556), IEEE, pp. 738–743. doi: 10.1109/AIM.2001.936758

    work page doi:10.1109/aim.2001.936758 2001

  20. [20]

    Modeling the Static Force of a Festo Pneumatic Muscle Actuator: A New Approach and a Comparison to Existing Models,

    M. Martens and I. Boblan, “Modeling the Static Force of a Festo Pneumatic Muscle Actuator: A New Approach and a Comparison to Existing Models,” Actuators, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 33, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.3390/act6040033

    work page doi:10.3390/act6040033 2017

  21. [21]

    Recent Developments in Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuators,

    A. Zhagiparova, V. Golubev, and D. Kim, “Recent Developments in Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuators,” Actuators, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 582, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.3390/act14120582

    work page doi:10.3390/act14120582 2025

  22. [22]

    Braided Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,

    D. G. Caldwell, A. Razak, and M. Goodwin, “Braided Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 522–527, Apr. 1993, doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)49354-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)49354-2 1993

  23. [23]

    Development and Testing of Novel Soft Sleeve Actuators,

    M. Abboodi and M. Doumit, “Development and Testing of Novel Soft Sleeve Actuators,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 39995–40010, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3376407

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3376407 2024

  24. [24]

    Twisting Soft Sleeve Actuator: Design and Experimental Evaluation,

    M. Abboodi and M. Doumit, “Twisting Soft Sleeve Actuator: Design and Experimental Evaluation,” Electronics (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 20, p. 4020, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.3390/electronics14204020

    work page doi:10.3390/electronics14204020 2025

  25. [25]

    A Novel Soft Pneumatic Artificial Muscle with High-Contraction Ratio,

    K. Han, N.-H. Kim, and D. Shin, “A Novel Soft Pneumatic Artificial Muscle with High-Contraction Ratio,” Soft Robot., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 554–566, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1089/soro.2017.0114

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2017.0114 2018

  26. [26]

    Biocompatible micro, soft bellow actuator rapidly manufactured using 3D-printed soluble mold,

    W. Jung, Y. Kang, S. Han, and Y. Hwang, “Biocompatible micro, soft bellow actuator rapidly manufactured using 3D-printed soluble mold,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 29, no. 12, p. 125005, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6439/ab477f

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6439/ab477f 2019

  27. [27]

    PolyJet-Printed Bellows Actuators: Design, Structural Optimization, and Experimental Investigation,

    G. Dämmer, S. Gablenz, A. Hildebrandt, and Z. Major, “PolyJet-Printed Bellows Actuators: Design, Structural Optimization, and Experimental Investigation,” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 6, May 2019, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00034

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2019.00034 2019

  28. [28]

    Response surface design of bellows parameters with negative pressure shrinkage performance,

    M. Cao, J. Zhu, H. Fu, and H. Y. F. Loic, “Response surface design of bellows parameters with negative pressure shrinkage performance,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1041–1052, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12008-021-00809-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s12008-021-00809-6 2022

  29. [29]

    Mechanoreception for Soft Robots via Intuitive Body Cues,

    L. Wang and Z. Wang, “Mechanoreception for Soft Robots via Intuitive Body Cues,” Soft Robot., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 198–217, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1089/soro.2018.0135

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2018.0135 2020

  30. [30]

    Modeling vacuum bellows soft pneumatic actuators with optimal mechanical performance,

    W. Felt, M. A. Robertson, and J. Paik, “Modeling vacuum bellows soft pneumatic actuators with optimal mechanical performance,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), IEEE, Apr. 2018, pp. 534–540. doi: 10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2018.8405381

    work page doi:10.1109/robosoft.2018.8405381 2018

  31. [31]

    Hydroforming of Toroidal Bellows: Process Simulation and Quality Control,

    M. Ye, H. Li, Y. Wang, and C. Qian, “Hydroforming of Toroidal Bellows: Process Simulation and Quality Control,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 142, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/ma14010142

    work page doi:10.3390/ma14010142 2020

  32. [32]

    A Soft Robotic Hand Based on Bellows Actuators for Dishwashing Automation,

    Z. Wang et al., “A Soft Robotic Hand Based on Bellows Actuators for Dishwashing Automation,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2139– 2146, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3061063

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3061063 2021

  33. [33]

    Modeling of a soft-rigid gripper actuated by a linear-extension soft pneumatic actuator,

    P. Cheng, J. Jia, Y. Ye, and C. Wu, “Modeling of a soft-rigid gripper actuated by a linear-extension soft pneumatic actuator,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–19, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21020493

    work page doi:10.3390/s21020493 2021

  34. [34]

    Elastomeric Origami: Programmable Paper‐Elastomer Composites as Pneumatic Actuators,

    R. V. Martinez, C. R. Fish, X. Chen, and G. M. Whitesides, “Elastomeric Origami: Programmable Paper‐Elastomer Composites as Pneumatic Actuators,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1376–1384, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1002/adfm.201102978

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.201102978 2012

  35. [35]

    Fluid- driven origami-inspired artificial muscles,

    S. Li, D. M. Vogt, D. Rus, and R. J. Wood, “Fluid- driven origami-inspired artificial muscles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 50, pp. 13132–13137, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713450114

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1713450114 2017

  36. [36]

    3D Shrinking for Rapid Fabrication of Origami-Inspired Semi-Soft Pneumatic Actuators,

    A. Zaghloul and G. M. Bone, “3D Shrinking for Rapid Fabrication of Origami-Inspired Semi-Soft Pneumatic Actuators,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 191330–191340, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032131

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2020.3032131 2020

  37. [37]

    4D printed origami-inspired accordion, Kresling and Yoshimura tubes,

    A. L. Wickeler, K. McLellan, Y.-C. Sun, and H. E. Naguib, “4D printed origami-inspired accordion, Kresling and Yoshimura tubes,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 2379–2392, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1177/1045389X231181940

    work page doi:10.1177/1045389x231181940 2023

  38. [38]

    Design Methodology for a 3D Printable Multi‐ Degree of Freedom Soft Actuator Using Geometric Origami Patterns,

    Y. X. Mak, A. Dijkshoorn, and M. Abayazid, “Design Methodology for a 3D Printable Multi‐ Degree of Freedom Soft Actuator Using Geometric Origami Patterns,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 6, no. 6, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1002/aisy.202300666

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202300666 2024

  39. [39]

    A crawling robot driven by multi-stable origami,

    A. Pagano, T. Yan, B. Chien, A. Wissa, and S. Tawfick, “A crawling robot driven by multi-stable origami,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 26, no. 9, p. 094007, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/aa721e

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-665x/aa721e 2017

  40. [40]

    Qualitative synthesis of deformable cylindrical actuators through constraint topology,

    S. Hirai, P. Cusin, H. Tanigawa, T. Masui, S. Konishi, and S. Kawamura, “Qualitative synthesis of deformable cylindrical actuators through constraint topology,” in Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113), IEEE, 2000, pp. 197–202. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2000.894604

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2000.894604 2000

  41. [41]

    Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching,

    F. Connolly, C. J. Walsh, and K. Bertoldi, “Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 51–56, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615140114

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1615140114 2017

  42. [42]

    Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators,

    K. C. Galloway, P. Polygerinos, C. J. Walsh, and R. J. Wood, “Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators,” in 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), IEEE, Nov. 2013, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICAR.2013.6766586

    work page doi:10.1109/icar.2013.6766586 2013

  43. [43]

    Comparison and experimental validation of predictive models for soft, fiber-reinforced actuators,

    A. Sedal, A. Wineman, R. B. Gillespie, and C. D. Remy, “Comparison and experimental validation of predictive models for soft, fiber-reinforced actuators,” Int. J. Rob. Res., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 119– 135, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0278364919879493

    work page doi:10.1177/0278364919879493 2021

  44. [44]

    Soft Fiber-Reinforced Pneumatic Actuator Design and Fabrication: Towards Robust, Soft Robotic Systems,

    J. Fras and K. Althoefer, “Soft Fiber-Reinforced Pneumatic Actuator Design and Fabrication: Towards Robust, Soft Robotic Systems,” 2019, pp. 103–114. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23807-0_9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23807-0_9 2019

  45. [45]

    Adaptive control of a soft pneumatic actuator using experimental characterization data,

    Y. X. Mak, H. Naghibi, Y. Lin, and M. Abayazid, “Adaptive control of a soft pneumatic actuator using experimental characterization data,” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 10, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1056118

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1056118 2023

  46. [46]

    Third–Generation Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Robotic Applications: Development and Comparison with McKibben Muscle,

    D. Villegas, M. Van Damme, B. Vanderborght, P. Beyl, and D. Lefeber, “Third–Generation Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Robotic Applications: Development and Comparison with McKibben Muscle,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 26, no. 11–12, pp. 1205–1227, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1080/01691864.2012.689722

    work page doi:10.1080/01691864.2012.689722 2012

  47. [47]

    United States Patent (19) Immega et al. 54 AXIALLY CONTRACTABLE ACTUATOR

    G. Immega, “United States Patent (19) Immega et al. 54 AXIALLY CONTRACTABLE ACTUATOR.”

  48. [48]

    Simulation analysis for optimal design of pneumatic bellow actuators for soft-robotic glove,

    N. Guo et al., “Simulation analysis for optimal design of pneumatic bellow actuators for soft-robotic glove,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1359–1368, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.08.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.08.002 2020

  49. [49]

    Soft Robotics for Chemists,

    F. Ilievski, A. D. Mazzeo, R. F. Shepherd, X. Chen, and G. M. Whitesides, “Soft Robotics for Chemists,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 1930–1935, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1002/ange.201006464

    work page doi:10.1002/ange.201006464 1930

  50. [50]

    Towards a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation,

    P. Polygerinos et al., “Towards a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation,” in 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, Nov. 2013, pp. 1512–1517. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696549

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696549 2013

  51. [51]

    Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly,

    B. Mosadegh et al., “Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 2163–2170, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303288

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.201303288 2014

  52. [52]

    Programmable design of soft pneu-net actuators with oblique chambers can generate coupled bending and twisting motions,

    T. Wang, L. Ge, and G. Gu, “Programmable design of soft pneu-net actuators with oblique chambers can generate coupled bending and twisting motions,” Sens. Actuators A Phys., vol. 271, pp. 131–138, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.01.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2018.01.018 2018

  53. [53]

    Robotic Tentacles with Three‐Dimensional Mobility Based on Flexible Elastomers,

    R. V. Martinez et al., “Robotic Tentacles with Three‐Dimensional Mobility Based on Flexible Elastomers,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 205–212, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1002/adma.201203002

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201203002 2013

  54. [54]

    Multigait soft robot,

    R. F. Shepherd et al., “Multigait soft robot,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. 51, pp. 20400–20403, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116564108

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1116564108 2011

  55. [55]

    Development and evaluation of fiber reinforced modular soft actuators and an individualized soft rehabilitation glove,

    S. Kokubu, P. E. T. Vinocour, and W. Yu, “Development and evaluation of fiber reinforced modular soft actuators and an individualized soft rehabilitation glove,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 171, p. 104571, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2023.104571

    work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2023.104571 2024

  56. [56]

    Modeling of Soft Fiber- Reinforced Bending Actuators,

    P. Polygerinos et al., “Modeling of Soft Fiber- Reinforced Bending Actuators,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 778–789, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TRO.2015.2428504

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2015.2428504 2015

  57. [57]

    Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation,

    P. Polygerinos, Z. Wang, K. C. Galloway, R. J. Wood, and C. J. Walsh, “Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 73, pp. 135–143, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014 2015

  58. [58]

    Mechanical Programming of Soft Actuators by Varying Fiber Angle,

    F. Connolly, P. Polygerinos, C. J. Walsh, and K. Bertoldi, “Mechanical Programming of Soft Actuators by Varying Fiber Angle,” Soft Robot., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–32, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1089/soro.2015.0001

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2015.0001 2015

  59. [59]

    Design and Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Soft Actuators for Wearable Hand Rehabilitation Device,

    K. Ma, Z. Jiang, S. Gao, X. Cao, and F. Xu, “Design and Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Soft Actuators for Wearable Hand Rehabilitation Device,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 6115–6122, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3167063

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3167063 2022

  60. [60]

    Design and characterization of low-cost fabric-based flat pneumatic actuators for soft assistive glove application,

    H. Kai. Yap, Frederick. Sebastian, Christopher. Wiedeman, and C.-H. Yeow, “Design and characterization of low-cost fabric-based flat pneumatic actuators for soft assistive glove application,” in 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), IEEE, Jul. 2017, pp. 1465–1470. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009454

    work page doi:10.1109/icorr.2017.8009454 2017

  61. [61]

    A bidirectional soft pneumatic fabric-based actuator for grasping applications,

    J. H. Low et al., “A bidirectional soft pneumatic fabric-based actuator for grasping applications,” in 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, Sep. 2017, pp. 1180–1186. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2017.8202290

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8202290 2017

  62. [62]

    Exploiting Textile Mechanical Anisotropy for Fabric-Based Pneumatic Actuators,

    L. Cappello et al., “Exploiting Textile Mechanical Anisotropy for Fabric-Based Pneumatic Actuators,” Soft Robot., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 662–674, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1089/soro.2017.0076

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2017.0076 2018

  63. [63]

    Design and Computational Modeling of Fabric Soft Pneumatic Actuators for Wearable Assistive Devices,

    P. H. Nguyen and W. Zhang, “Design and Computational Modeling of Fabric Soft Pneumatic Actuators for Wearable Assistive Devices,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 9638, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65003-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65003-2 2020

  64. [64]

    Assisting hand function after spinal cord injury with a fabric-based soft robotic glove,

    L. Cappello et al., “Assisting hand function after spinal cord injury with a fabric-based soft robotic glove,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 59, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0391-x

    work page doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0391-x 2018

  65. [65]

    Fabric soft pneumatic actuators with programmable turing pattern textures,

    M. Tanaka, Y. Song, and T. Nomura, “Fabric soft pneumatic actuators with programmable turing pattern textures,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 19175, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69450-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-69450-z 2024

  66. [66]

    Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of Fabric-Based Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Wearable Assistive Gloves,

    L. Ge et al., “Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of Fabric-Based Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Wearable Assistive Gloves,” Soft Robot., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 583–596, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0105

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2019.0105 2020

  67. [67]

    Assessment of Soft Actuators for Hand Exoskeletons: Pleated Textile Actuators and Fiber-Reinforced Silicone Actuators,

    O. Ramos, M. Múnera, M. Moazen, H. Wurdemann, and C. A. Cifuentes, “Assessment of Soft Actuators for Hand Exoskeletons: Pleated Textile Actuators and Fiber-Reinforced Silicone Actuators,” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 10, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.924888

    work page doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.924888 2022

  68. [68]

    Soft Robotic Fabric Actuator With Elastic Bands for High Force and Bending Performance in Hand Exoskeletons,

    C. Suulker, S. Skach, and K. Althoefer, “Soft Robotic Fabric Actuator With Elastic Bands for High Force and Bending Performance in Hand Exoskeletons,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 10621–10627, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3194883

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3194883 2022

  69. [69]

    A fabric-based soft hand exoskeleton for assistance: the ExHand Exoskeleton,

    J. C. Maldonado-Mejía et al., “A fabric-based soft hand exoskeleton for assistance: the ExHand Exoskeleton,” Front. Neurorobot., vol. 17, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1091827

    work page doi:10.3389/fnbot.2023.1091827 2023

  70. [70]

    Encoded sewing soft textile robots,

    X. Guo et al., “Encoded sewing soft textile robots,” Sci. Adv., vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk3855

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adk3855 2024

  71. [71]

    Soft Twisting Pneumatic Actuators Enabled by Freeform Surface Design,

    F. Chen, Y. Miao, G. Gu, and X. Zhu, “Soft Twisting Pneumatic Actuators Enabled by Freeform Surface Design,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5253–5260, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3072813

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3072813 2021

  72. [72]

    Force and moment generation of fiber-reinforced pneumatic soft actuators,

    J. Bishop-Moser, G. Krishnan, and S. Kota, “Force and moment generation of fiber-reinforced pneumatic soft actuators,” in 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, Nov. 2013, pp. 4460–4465. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696997

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696997 2013

  73. [73]

    A Closed-Form Kinematic Model for Fiber-Reinforced Elastomeric Enclosures,

    W. Felt and C. David Remy, “A Closed-Form Kinematic Model for Fiber-Reinforced Elastomeric Enclosures,” J. Mech. Robot., vol. 10, no. 1, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1115/1.4038220

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4038220 2018

  74. [74]

    Cooperative collapse of helical structure enables the actuation of twisting pneumatic artificial muscle,

    W. Xiao, X. Du, W. Chen, G. Yang, D. Hu, and X. Han, “Cooperative collapse of helical structure enables the actuation of twisting pneumatic artificial muscle,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 201, p. 106483, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106483

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106483 2021

  75. [75]

    Pneumatic Torsional Actuators for Inflatable Robots,

    S. Sanan, P. S. Lynn, and S. T. Griffith, “Pneumatic Torsional Actuators for Inflatable Robots,” J. Mech. Robot., vol. 6, no. 3, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1115/1.4026629

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4026629 2014

  76. [76]

    Soft and flexible robot skin actuator using multilayer 3D pneumatic network,

    H. G. Shin, W. K. Chung, and K. Kim, “Soft and flexible robot skin actuator using multilayer 3D pneumatic network,” Nat. Commun., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 5575, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60496- 9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60496- 2025

  77. [77]

    Flexible pneumatic twisting actuators and their application to tilting micromirrors,

    B. Gorissen, T. Chishiro, S. Shimomura, D. Reynaerts, M. De Volder, and S. Konishi, “Flexible pneumatic twisting actuators and their application to tilting micromirrors,” Sens. Actuators A Phys., vol. 216, pp. 426–431, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2014.01.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2014.01.015 2014

  78. [78]

    Shape morphing of soft robotics by pneumatic torsion strip braiding,

    C. Wu, H. Liu, S. Lin, J. Lam, N. Xi, and Y. Chen, “Shape morphing of soft robotics by pneumatic torsion strip braiding,” Nat. Commun., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 3787, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59051- 3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59051- 2025

  79. [79]

    Origami-Inspired Soft Twisting Actuator,

    D. Li et al., “Origami-Inspired Soft Twisting Actuator,” Soft Robot., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 395–409, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1089/soro.2021.0185

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2021.0185 2023

  80. [80]

    Torsional Pneumatic Actuator Based on Pre-Twisted Pneumatic Tubes for Soft Robotic Manipulators,

    N. Oh, J.-G. Lee, and H. Rodrigue, “Torsional Pneumatic Actuator Based on Pre-Twisted Pneumatic Tubes for Soft Robotic Manipulators,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 3191–3201, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2023.3262235

    work page doi:10.1109/tmech.2023.3262235 2023

Showing first 80 references.