pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26391 · v2 · pith:VUGRDMEXnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 💻 cs.GR · cs.CV

Garment Particles: A 2D--3D Symmetric Garment Representation for Generation and Editing

Kiyohiro Nakayama , I-Chao Shen , Ruofan Liu , Yiming Wang , Gordon Wetzstein , Takeo Igarashi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 18:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GR cs.CV
keywords garment modelingsewing patternspoint cloud representationrectified flowdiffusion posterior sampling3D garment generationgarment editing2D-3D symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 5D point-cloud representation jointly encodes 2D sewing patterns and 3D garment geometry for unified generation and editing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Garment Particles as a 5D point-cloud structure that keeps 2D sewing patterns and 3D draped shapes linked together. This structure feeds a rectified flow model that accepts high-level prompts such as text or sketches to produce garments and that supports direct edits to either the pattern or the 3D form. Earlier methods handled generation or editing in isolation because they could not preserve the tight coupling between flat and draped representations. The new representation is shown to reach state-of-the-art generation quality on multiple datasets while also enabling interpolation, silhouette conditioning, and pattern editing. A separate conversion step turns the particles into curved sewing patterns ready for standard simulation.

Core claim

Garment Particles is a 5D point-cloud representation that jointly encodes 2D sewing patterns and 3D geometry. This representation enables Garment Particles Flow (GPF), a rectified flow framework that supports intuitive generation from high-level inputs (text, images, sketches) and various editing operations on 2D sewing patterns and 3D geometries via diffusion posterior sampling. Particles-to-Pattern Flow then converts generated garment particles into curved-based patterns for simulation.

What carries the argument

Garment Particles, the 5D point-cloud representation that jointly encodes 2D sewing patterns and 3D draped geometry in a single symmetric structure.

Load-bearing premise

The 5D point-cloud representation can jointly encode 2D sewing patterns and 3D draped geometry while preserving their complex interdependencies without critical information loss.

What would settle it

An experiment in which an edited 2D sewing pattern is run through conventional physics simulation and the resulting 3D shape differs substantially from the 3D geometry produced by editing the corresponding 5D particles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26391 by Gordon Wetzstein, I-Chao Shen, Kiyohiro Nakayama, Ruofan Liu, Takeo Igarashi, Yiming Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Garment Particles is a garment representation that models both the sewing pattern and its draped garment geometry in a symmetric, 2D-3D point cloud. (a) shows the garment particles representation. The color on the 3D garment (left) and the 2D sewing pattern (right) indicate the same points. Garment Particles Flow (GPF), a generative framework, generates garment particles from multimodal inputs. More import… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Garment Particles Illustration. (Left) We model garments as the graph Γ of the parametric function mapping sewing pattern 𝑈 in R 2 to its draped geometry 𝒓 (𝑈 ) in R 3 . (Right) We discretize Γ by point samples, denoted as 𝑿Γ. Points with the same color in 2D and 3D represent the corre￾sponding points in our representation. Black points mark the boundary of𝑈. differentiable projection function. Using garme… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Garment Particles Flow (GPF) is a generative model that generates simulation-ready garments via a two-stage pipeline. In the first stage, multimodal inputs, such as text, sketches, and images, are fed to GPF via cross-attention to generate garment particles 𝑿1. Diffusion posterior sampling guides the generation based on users’ edits. The generated garment particles are then fed into Particles-to-Pattern Fl… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Objective Guided Interactions. (Left) By leveraging a trained GPF model, we can optimize the posterior mean 𝑿ˆ 1|𝑡 at each step against an observation 𝒀 and guide the generation process towards a garment sample that minimizes our specified objective L. (Right) By adjusting the hyperparameter stop_t, our objective-guided sampling can produce more faithful (higher stop_t) or more diverse (lower stop_t) resul… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Text-conditioned Garment Generation. The baselines exhibit artifacts, as indicated by the red boxes (e.g., incorrect panel shapes or styles). In contrast, our method outputs realistic garments that align with the input prompt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Image-conditioned Garment Generation. Compared to the baselines, which exhibit incorrect pattern style and stitching, our method correctly generates a sewing pattern that yields a draped garment matching the input image for both sketch and GCDv2 image inputs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Point-Cloud-Conditioned Garment Generation. We demonstrate various point-cloud-based garment editing applications enabled by GPF. (a) illustrates how users can directly edit an existing 3D garment to guide its generation. Addition and deletion of points are achieved using our 3D interface. (b) shows garment mixing, where components of two existing 3D garments are combined to generate a new garment. (c) sho… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sewing Pattern Editing. Given a generated garment shown in grey, we edit the sewing pattern and use it to guide the garment generation process. The red part illustrates the user’s addition with our 2D user interface. 6.2 Objective Guided Garment Editing 6.2.1 Point-cloud-conditioned Sewing Pattern Generation. DPS en￾ables garment generation from point clouds without additional train￾ing. In Figure 7a, we p… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Silhouette Conditioned Garment Generation. The user paints 2D projection to guide the garment generation process using our 2D user interface. The user can control the complexity of the generated garments as the number of points changes. The numbers indicate the number of garment particles used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: In-the-wild Image-conditioned Garment Generation. Our method can generate more plausible sewing patterns than ChatGarment that match the garment style displayed in the in-the-wild images. wrinkles in the garment geometry that are difficult to specify in 3D. Next, we use only the bottom part of the garment for 3D conditioned garment generation. Finally, we edited the front silhouette to enlarge the skirt a… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Multi-step Garment Editing Session. We show a garment editing sequence combining various editing methods enabled by GPF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Fabrication Examples. We fabricated generated sewing patterns. 8 Conclusion We present Garment Particles, a 2D–3D symmetric garment represen￾tation that jointly encodes the sewing pattern and its draped garment geometry as a 5D point cloud. Using garment particles, we train Gar￾ment Particles Flow (GPF), a flow-based generative framework that learns a semantically rich prior space that enables state-of-th… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Closest Query Visualization. (Top) We visualize the top three nearest neighbors in the training set to our generated garment particles (leftmost column). Our GPF model can generate novel garments with a distinct style compared to the training set. (Bottom) We plot the distance of our generated sets to the training set as a cumulative plot. The arrows indicate the bins to which each of the visualized garme… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: 3D Interface Illustration. Our 3D interface allows users to directly manipulate 3D geometry with operations such as point addition, deletion, and translation. implemented a set of editing tools that enable users to directly manip￾ulate the point cloud with controllers, including point addition, dele￾tion, and translation. The system was implemented in Unity, a cross￾platform 3D game engine, using the buil… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: 2D Interface Illustration. Our 2D interface supports silhouette and pattern editing with paintbrushes. The top row shows our interface’s layout, the next two rows show different operations we allow for silhouette and pattern editing. We use the same architecture as our particles-to-pattern flow model, but simply change the loss to mean squared error. Delaunay variant reconstructs the sewing pattern as a f… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Unconditional Generation Gallery. SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Text-Conditioned Generation: Additional Visualization. SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Image-Conditioned Generation: Additional Visualization on Garment Sketches Dataset. SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Image-Conditioned Generation: Additional Visualization on GCDV2 Dataset. SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Garment Interpolation Results. SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Additional Sewing Pattern Editing Results. Each row showcases a modified sewing pattern of the garment asset on the left. The red paint indicates users’ input. The modified sewing pattern, combined with an optional text prompt, guides the generation of GPF garments. The generated garment asset after draping and its sewing pattern are shown below the inputs. SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Additional Point-cloud-conditioned Generation Results. Method Garment Aesthetics Text-Prompt Alignment Physical Plausibility AIpparel 821.6 888.2 857.1 SewingLDM 993.3 1042.2 963.1 D2GC 1060.9 1084.0 1030.5 ChatGarment 1040.3 858.6 1048.3 Ours 1168.6 1143.8 1126.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Runtime Analysis for Garment Editing Tasks. C.5.2 Editing Runtime Analysis. We also report garment editing runtime for the different tasks we showcased in the paper. Because the DPS algorithm’s runtime depends on hyperparameters such as the input number of points, we plot the total runtime of DPS with dif￾ferent number of input points, given the same loss and observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Practical garment design spans two modes: intuitive creation from high-level intent, such as a reference image or text description, and complex low-level editing across 2D sewing patterns and 3D draped geometry, which requires professional training to navigate their complex interdependencies. Yet existing frameworks address only part of this challenge, offering either garment generation from casual inputs or direct editing on sewing patterns. To support both ends of the spectrum, we propose Garment Particles, a 5D point-cloud representation that jointly encodes 2D sewing patterns and 3D geometry. This representation enables Garment Particles Flow (GPF), a rectified flow framework that supports intuitive generation from high-level inputs (text, images, sketches) and various editing operations on 2D sewing patterns and 3D geometries via diffusion posterior sampling. Finally, we introduce Particles-to-Pattern Flow that converts generated garment particles into curved-based patterns for simulation. We validate our model's generation ability on multiple datasets, achieving state-of-the-art garment generation results against competitive baselines. Our model also enables many garment editing scenarios, including garment interpolation, sewing pattern editing, point-cloud- and silhouette-conditioned garment generation. Our project website is at https://garment-particles.github.io .

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Garment Particles, a 5D point-cloud representation that jointly encodes 2D sewing patterns and 3D draped geometry in a symmetric manner. This representation underpins Garment Particles Flow (GPF), a rectified-flow model supporting generation from high-level inputs (text, images, sketches) and editing operations (interpolation, pattern editing, conditioned generation) via diffusion posterior sampling. The work also introduces a Particles-to-Pattern Flow conversion to produce curve-based patterns suitable for simulation. The authors claim state-of-the-art quantitative results on multiple garment datasets and demonstrate qualitative editing scenarios.

Significance. If the 5D representation successfully preserves interdependencies between 2D patterns and 3D geometry without critical loss, the unified framework would meaningfully advance garment modeling in computer graphics by bridging casual generation and professional editing. The application of rectified flow and posterior sampling to this domain, together with the explicit Particles-to-Pattern conversion step, constitutes a practical contribution. The stress-test concern regarding information loss in the joint encoding does not manifest as an internal inconsistency or unsupported step in the described pipeline; the central claims rest on established techniques applied to a novel representation rather than circular definitions.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the statement that results are 'state-of-the-art' against 'competitive baselines' would be strengthened by naming the datasets and reporting at least one key quantitative metric (e.g., Chamfer distance or IoU) directly in the abstract.
  2. Section 3: the construction of the 5D point cloud (how the two extra dimensions encode sewing pattern information alongside 3D coordinates) should include an explicit equation or pseudocode to clarify the joint encoding.
  3. The Particles-to-Pattern Flow conversion is introduced but its algorithmic details and any associated error metrics are not described in sufficient detail for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work, the favorable assessment of its significance, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces Garment Particles as a novel 5D point-cloud representation jointly encoding 2D sewing patterns and 3D geometry, then applies established rectified flow (GPF) and diffusion posterior sampling for generation/editing, plus a Particles-to-Pattern conversion step. No derivation reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central claims rest on the proposed architecture and external benchmarks rather than tautological equivalences. The framework is self-contained against standard ML techniques without internal reduction to author-defined priors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the core representation itself.

invented entities (1)
  • Garment Particles (5D point-cloud representation) no independent evidence
    purpose: Jointly encode 2D sewing patterns and 3D geometry
    Core new representation introduced to enable the flow model and editing operations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5773 in / 1176 out tokens · 44842 ms · 2026-06-29T18:58:20.407551+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Graph.35, 4, Article 50 (July 2016), 11 pages

    Physics-driven pattern adjustment for direct 3D garment editing.ACM Trans. Graph.35, 4, Article 50 (July 2016), 11 pages. doi:10.1145/2897824.2925896 Siyuan Bian, Chenghao Xu, Yuliang Xiu, Artur Grigorev, Zhen Liu, Cewu Lu, Michael J Black, and Yao Feng

    work page doi:10.1145/2897824.2925896 2016

  2. [2]

    ChatGarment: Garment Estimation, Generation and Editing via Large Language Models. (2025). Remi Brouet, Alla Sheffer, Laurence Boissieux, and Marie-Paule Cani

    2025

  3. [3]

    Graph.31, 4, Article 36 (July 2012), 11 pages

    Design preserving garment transfer.ACM Trans. Graph.31, 4, Article 36 (July 2012), 11 pages. doi:10.1145/2185520.2185532 Selim Emir Can, Jan Ackermann, Kiyohiro Nakayama, Ruofan Liu, Tong Wu, Yang Zheng, Hugo Bertiche, Menglei Chai, Thabo Beeler, and Gordon Wetzstein

    work page doi:10.1145/2185520.2185532 2012

  4. [4]

    Hsiao-Yu Chen, Egor Larionov, Ladislav Kavan, Gene Lin, Doug Roble, Olga Sorkine- Hornung, and Tuur Stuyck

    Image2Garment: Simulation-ready Garment Generation from a Single Image.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.09658(2026). Hsiao-Yu Chen, Egor Larionov, Ladislav Kavan, Gene Lin, Doug Roble, Olga Sorkine- Hornung, and Tuur Stuyck

    work page arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    ACM Comput

    Dress Anyone: Automatic Physically-Based Garment Pattern Refitting.Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech.8, 4, Article 56 (Aug. 2025), 17 pages. doi:10.1145/3747858 Hyungjin Chung, Jeongsol Kim, Michael Thompson Mccann, Marc Louis Klasky, and Jong Chul Ye

    work page doi:10.1145/3747858 2025

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1108/09556220810843502 Tri Dao, Daniel Y

    Made-to-measure pattern development based on 3D whole body scans.International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 20 (01 2008), 15–25. doi:10.1108/09556220810843502 Tri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré

    work page doi:10.1108/09556220810843502 2008

  7. [7]

    FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness

    FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness. arXiv:2205.14135 [cs.LG] https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14135 Charles de Malefette, Anran Qi, Amal Dev Parakkat, Marie-Paule Cani, and Takeo Igarashi

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Technical Communications(Sydney, NSW, Australia)(SA ’23)

    PerfectDart: Automatic Dart Design for Garment Fitting. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Technical Communications(Sydney, NSW, Australia)(SA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 4 pages. doi:10.1145/3610543.3626154 A. M. Eggler, R. Falque, M. Liu, T. Vidal-Calleja, O. Sorkine-Hornung, and N. Pietroni

    work page doi:10.1145/3610543.3626154 2023

  9. [9]

    arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.15248 doi:10.1111/cgf.15248 Slava Elizarov, Ciara Rowles, and Simon Donné

    Digital Garment Alteration.Computer Graphics Forum43, 7 (2024), e15248. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.15248 doi:10.1111/cgf.15248 Slava Elizarov, Ciara Rowles, and Simon Donné

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.15248 2024

  10. [10]

    CLO Virtual Fashion

    Geometry image diffusion: Fast and data-efficient text-to-3d with image-based surface representation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03718(2024). CLO Virtual Fashion. 2009.CLO 3D – 3D fashion design software. https://www.clo3d.com/ Accessed: 2025-10-07. Xianfeng Gu, Steven J. Gortler, and Hugues Hoppe

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Graph.21, 3 (July 2002), 355–361

    Geometry images.ACM Trans. Graph.21, 3 (July 2002), 355–361. doi:10.1145/566654.566589 Kai He, Kaixin Yao, Qixuan Zhang, Jingyi Yu, Lingjie Liu, and Lan Xu. 2024b. Dress- Code: Autoregressively Sewing and Generating Garments from Text Guidance. arXiv:2401.16465 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16465 Qingdong He, Jinlong Peng, Pengcheng Xu, Boyuan Jiang,...

    work page doi:10.1145/566654.566589 2002

  12. [12]

    CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning

    CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning.ArXiv abs/2104.08718 (2021). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:233296711 SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Garment Particles: A 2D–3D Symmetric Garment Representation for Generation and Editing•11 Yuki Igarashi, Takeo Igarashi, and Hiromasa Suzuki

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Posters(Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH ’08)

    Automatically adding seam allowance to cloth pattern. InACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Posters(Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 15, 1 pages. doi:10.1145/1400885.1400902 Menglin Jia, Mengyun Shi, Mikhail Sirotenko, Yin Cui, Claire Cardie, Bharath Hariharan, Hartwig Adam, and Serge Belongie

    work page doi:10.1145/1400885.1400902 2008

  14. [14]

    FlowDPS: Flow- Driven Posterior Sampling for Inverse Problems. arXiv:2503.08136 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08136 Maria Korosteleva, Timur Levent Kesdogan, Fabian Kemper, Stephan Wenninger, Jasmin Koller, Yuhan Zhang, Mario Botsch, and Olga Sorkine-Hornung

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    arXiv:2405.17609 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17609 Maria Korosteleva and Sung-Hee Lee

    GarmentCodeData: A Dataset of 3D Made-to-Measure Garments With Sewing Patterns. arXiv:2405.17609 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17609 Maria Korosteleva and Sung-Hee Lee

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Graph.41, 4 (2022), 16 pages

    NeuralTailor: Reconstructing Sewing Pattern Structures from 3D Point Clouds of Garments.ACM Trans. Graph.41, 4 (2022), 16 pages. doi:10.1145/3528223.3530179 Maria Korosteleva and Olga Sorkine-Hornung

    work page doi:10.1145/3528223.3530179 2022

  17. [17]

    doi:10.1145/3618351 SIGGRAPH ASIA 2023 issue

    GarmentCode: Programming Parametric Sewing Patterns.ACM Transaction on Graphics42, 6 (2023), 16 pages. doi:10.1145/3618351 SIGGRAPH ASIA 2023 issue. Mingi Lee, Dongsu Zhang, Clément Jambon, and Young Min Kim

    work page doi:10.1145/3618351 2023

  18. [18]

    InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers(Vancouver, BC, Canada)(SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’25)

    BrepDiff: Single- Stage B-rep Diffusion Model. InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers(Vancouver, BC, Canada)(SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 103, 11 pages. doi:10.1145/3721238.3730698 Minchen Li, Alla Sheffer, ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3721238.3730698

  19. [19]

    Graph.37, 4, Article 133 (July 2018), 13 pages

    Foldsketch: enriching garments with physically reproducible folds.ACM Trans. Graph.37, 4, Article 133 (July 2018), 13 pages. doi:10.1145/3197517.3201310 Ren Li, Cong Cao, Corentin Dumery, Yingxuan You, Hao Li, and Pascal Fua. 2025a. Single View Garment Reconstruction Using Diffusion Mapping Via Pattern Coordinates. InProceedings of the Special Interest Gr...

    work page doi:10.1145/3197517.3201310 2018

  20. [20]

    Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL

    ISP: Multi-Layered Garment Draping with Implicit Sewing Patterns. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Shudong Li, Xiao Jiang, Matthew Tivnan, Grace J Gang, Yuan Shen, and J Webster Stayman. 2024b. CT reconstruction using diffusion posterior sampling conditioned on a nonlinear measurement model.Journal of Medical Imaging11, 4 (2024), 04350...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1145/3763271 2024

  21. [21]

    Computer-Aided Design104 (2018), 113–124

    3D interactive garment pattern-making technology. Computer-Aided Design104 (2018), 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2018.07.003 Lijuan Liu, Xiangyu Xu, Zhijie Lin, Jiabin Liang, and Shuicheng Yan

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cad.2018.07.003 2018

  22. [22]

    Shengqi Liu, Yuhao Cheng, Zhuo Chen, Xingyu Ren, Wenhan Zhu, Lincheng Li, Mengxiao Bi, Xiaokang Yang, and Yichao Yan

    Towards Garment Sewing Pattern Reconstruction from a Single Image.ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Asia)(2023). Shengqi Liu, Yuhao Cheng, Zhuo Chen, Xingyu Ren, Wenhan Zhu, Lincheng Li, Mengxiao Bi, Xiaokang Yang, and Yichao Yan. 2025a. Multimodal Latent Diffusion Model for Complex Sewing Pattern Generation.International Conference on Computer Visio...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cad.2010.11.008 2023

  23. [23]

    Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)(2025)

    AIpparel: A Multimodal Foundation Model for Digital Garments. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)(2025). Maxime Oquab, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni, Huy Vo, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al

    2025

  24. [24]

    DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision

    Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193(2023). Maitreya Patel, Song Wen, Dimitris N. Metaxas, and Yezhou Yang

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    William Peebles and Saining Xie

    Steering Rectified Flow Models in the Vector Field for Controlled Image Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00100(2024). William Peebles and Saining Xie

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers

    Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers. arXiv:2212.09748 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09748 Nico Pietroni, Corentin Dumery, Raphael Falque, Mark Liu, Teresa A Vidal-Calleja, and Olga Sorkine-Hornung

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Graph.41, 4 (2022), 157–1

    Computational pattern making from 3D garment models.ACM Trans. Graph.41, 4 (2022), 157–1. Anran Qi and Takeo Igarashi

    2022

  28. [28]

    PerfectTailor: Scale-Preserving 2-D Pattern Adjustment Driven by 3-D Garment Editing.IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl.44, 4 (July 2024), 126–132. doi:10.1109/MCG.2024.3378171 ANRAN QI, NICO PIETRONI, MARIA KOROSTELEVA, OLGA SORKINE-HORNUNG, and ADRIEN BOUSSEAU

    work page doi:10.1109/mcg.2024.3378171 2024

  29. [29]

    In SIGGRAPH 2025 Conference Paper

    Rags2Riches: Computational Garment Reuse. In SIGGRAPH 2025 Conference Paper. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever

    2025

  30. [30]

    Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision

    Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. arXiv:2103.00020 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00020 Davis Rempe, Zhengyi Luo, Xue Bin Peng, Ye Yuan, Kris Kitani, Karsten Kreis, Sanja Fidler, and Or Litany

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Graph.41, 4, Article 62 (July 2022), 16 pages

    True seams: modeling seams in digital garments.ACM Trans. Graph.41, 4, Article 62 (July 2022), 16 pages. doi:10.1145/3528223.3530128 Yossi Rubner, Carlo Tomasi, and Leonidas J. Guibas

    work page doi:10.1145/3528223.3530128 2022

  32. [32]

    The Earth Mover’s Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval.Int. J. Comput. Vision40, 2 (Nov. 2000), 99–121. doi:10.1023/A:1026543900054 Nicholas Sharp and Keenan Crane

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1026543900054 2000

  33. [33]

    Graph.37, 4 (2018)

    Variational Surface Cutting.ACM Trans. Graph.37, 4 (2018). Yawar Siddiqui, Antonio Alliegro, Alexey Artemov, Tatiana Tommasi, Daniele Sirigatti, Vladislav Rosov, Angela Dai, and Matthias Nießner

    2018

  34. [34]

    Graph.33, 4, Article 63 (July 2014), 10 pages

    Designing inflatable structures.ACM Trans. Graph.33, 4, Article 63 (July 2014), 10 pages. doi:10.1145/2601097.2601166 Style3D. 2015.Style3D. https://www.style3d.com/ Accessed: 2025-10-07. Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu

    work page doi:10.1145/2601097.2601166 2014

  35. [35]

    Zhuo Su, Jiehua Zhang, Longguang Wang, Hua Zhang, Zhen Liu, Matti Pietikäinen, and Li Liu

    Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing 568 (2024), 127063. Zhuo Su, Jiehua Zhang, Longguang Wang, Hua Zhang, Zhen Liu, Matti Pietikäinen, and Li Liu

    2024

  36. [36]

    doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3300513 Yuki Tatsukawa, Anran Qi, I-Chao Shen, and Takeo Igarashi

    Lightweight Pixel Difference Networks for Efficient Visual Representation Learning.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence45, 12 (2023), 14956–14974. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3300513 Yuki Tatsukawa, Anran Qi, I-Chao Shen, and Takeo Igarashi

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3300513 2023

  37. [37]

    InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers (SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’25)

    GarmentImage: Raster Encoding of Garment Sewing Patterns with Diverse Topologies. InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers (SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 46, 11 pages. doi:10.1145/3721238.3730632 Mohammad H Tau...

    work page doi:10.1145/3721238.3730632

  38. [38]

    Hao Tian, Yu Cao, and P

    Diffusion Model-Based Posterior Sampling in Full Waveform Inversion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12797(2025). Hao Tian, Yu Cao, and P. Y. Mok

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    InAdvances in Computer Graphics: 41st Computer Graphics International Conference, CGI 2024, Geneva, Switzerland, July 1–5, 2024, Proceedings, Part II(Geneva, Switzerland)

    SewPCT: Sewing Pattern Reconstruction from Point Cloud with Transformer. InAdvances in Computer Graphics: 41st Computer Graphics International Conference, CGI 2024, Geneva, Switzerland, July 1–5, 2024, Proceedings, Part II(Geneva, Switzerland). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 211–223. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82021-2_15 Nobuyuki Umetani, Danny M. Kaufma...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82021-2_15 2024

  40. [40]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Pa- pers(Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada)(SIGGRAPH ’11)

    Sensi- tive couture for interactive garment modeling and editing. InACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Pa- pers(Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada)(SIGGRAPH ’11). Association for Comput- ing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 90, 12 pages. doi:10.1145/1964921.1964985 Haoxuan Wang, Jinlong Peng, Qingdong He, Hao Yang, Ying Jin, Jiafu Wu, Xiaobin Hu, Yanjie Pan, Zhenye ...

    work page doi:10.1145/1964921.1964985 2011

  41. [41]

    SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Unicombine: Unified multi- conditional combination with diffusion transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09277 (2025). SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 12•Kiyohiro Nakayama, I-Chao Shen, Ruofan Liu, Yiming Wang, Gordon Wetzstein, and Takeo Igarashi Tuanfeng Y. Wang, Duygu Ceylan, Jovan Popović, and Niloy J. Mitra

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Graph.37, 6, Article 203 (Dec

    Learning a shared shape space for multimodal garment design.ACM Trans. Graph.37, 6, Article 203 (Dec. 2018), 13 pages. doi:10.1145/3272127.3275074 Wenbo Wang, Hsuan-I Ho, Chen Guo, Boxiang Rong, Artur Grigorev, Jie Song, Juan Jose Zarate, and Otmar Hilliges

    work page doi:10.1145/3272127.3275074 2018

  43. [43]

    https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252383414 Katja Wolff and Olga Sorkine-Hornung

    Designing Personalized Garments with Body Movement.Computer Graphics Forum42 (2021). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252383414 Katja Wolff and Olga Sorkine-Hornung

    2021

  44. [44]

    Graph.38, 4, Article 62 (July 2019), 12 pages

    Wallpaper pattern alignment along garment seams.ACM Trans. Graph.38, 4, Article 62 (July 2019), 12 pages. doi:10.1145/3306346.3322991 Tong Wu, Guandao Yang, Zhibing Li, Kai Zhang, Ziwei Liu, Leonidas Guibas, Dahua Lin, and Gordon Wetzstein

    work page doi:10.1145/3306346.3322991 2019

  45. [45]

    Structured 3D Latents for Scalable and Versatile 3D Generation

    Structured 3D Latents for Scalable and Versatile 3D Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01506(2024). Xiang Xu, Joseph G. Lambourne, Pradeep Kumar Jayaraman, Zhengqing Wang, Karl D. D. Willis, and Yasutaka Furukawa

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    arXiv:2401.15563 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15563 Xingguang Yan, Han-Hung Lee, Ziyu Wan, and Angel X

    BrepGen: A B-rep Generative Diffusion Model with Structured Latent Geometry. arXiv:2401.15563 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15563 Xingguang Yan, Han-Hung Lee, Ziyu Wan, and Angel X. Chang

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    arXiv:2408.03178 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03178 Shan Yang, Zherong Pan, Tanya Amert, Ke Wang, Licheng Yu, Tamara Berg, and Ming C

    An Object is Worth 64x64 Pixels: Generating 3D Object via Image Diffusion. arXiv:2408.03178 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03178 Shan Yang, Zherong Pan, Tanya Amert, Ke Wang, Licheng Yu, Tamara Berg, and Ming C. Lin

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Graph.37, 5, Article 170 (nov 2018), 14 pages

    Physics-Inspired Garment Recovery from a Single-View Image.ACM Trans. Graph.37, 5, Article 170 (nov 2018), 14 pages. doi:10.1145/3026479 Jingfeng Yao, Cheng Wang, Wenyu Liu, and Xinggang Wang

    work page doi:10.1145/3026479 2018

  49. [49]

    Jingfeng Yao, Bin Yang, and Xinggang Wang

    Fasterdit: Towards faster diffusion transformers training without architecture modification.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37 (2024), 56166–56189. Jingfeng Yao, Bin Yang, and Xinggang Wang

    2024

  50. [50]

    IP-Adapter: Text Compatible Image Prompt Adapter for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models. (2023). Zeya Yin, Tin Lai, Lucas Barcelos, Jayadeep Jacob, Yonghui Li, and Fabio Ramos

    2023

  51. [51]

    https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:281093556 Jingdong Zhang, Weikai Chen, Yuan Liu, Jionghao Wang, Zhengming Yu, Zhuowen Shen, Bo Yang, Wenping Wang, and Xin Li

    Diverse Motion Planning with Stein Diffusion Trajectory Inference.2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)(2025), 15610–15616. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:281093556 Jingdong Zhang, Weikai Chen, Yuan Liu, Jionghao Wang, Zhengming Yu, Zhuowen Shen, Bo Yang, Wenping Wang, and Xin Li

    2025

  52. [52]

    Longwen Zhang, Ziyu Wang, Qixuan Zhang, Qiwei Qiu, Anqi Pang, Haoran Jiang, Wei Yang, Lan Xu, and Jingyi Yu

    SPGen: Spherical Projection as Consistent and Flexible Representation for Single Image 3D Shape Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.12721(2025). Longwen Zhang, Ziyu Wang, Qixuan Zhang, Qiwei Qiu, Anqi Pang, Haoran Jiang, Wei Yang, Lan Xu, and Jingyi Yu. 2024b. Clay: A controllable large-scale generative model for creating high-quality 3d assets.ACM Trans...

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Graph.38, 4, Article 109 (July 2019), 13 pages

    Computational design of fabric formwork.ACM Trans. Graph.38, 4, Article 109 (July 2019), 13 pages. doi:10.1145/3306346.3322988 Feng Zhou, Ruiyang Liu, Chen Liu, Gaofeng He, Yong-Lu Li, Xiaogang Jin, and Huamin Wang

    work page doi:10.1145/3306346.3322988 2019

  54. [54]

    SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Design2GarmentCode: Turning Design Concepts to Tangible Garments Through Program Synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08603(2024). SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Garment Particles: A 2D–3D Symmetric Garment Representation for Generation and Editing•13 Supplementary Material for Garment Particles: A 2D–3D Symmetric G...

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    with” v.s. “without sleeves

    The training takes around 1.5 days. A.3 Text Caption Dataset Construction We construct a new text caption dataset to train our text-conditioned GPF model. We procedurally generate the text captions from the design parameters given in the GCDv2 dataset. Each text prompt consists of a set of short, keyword phrases, describing the make of dif- ferent compone...

    2025

  56. [56]

    The edited canvas is subsequently converted into a 2D point cloud via area sampling and forwarded to GPF for various guided generation tasks

    Editing operations are implemented through a canvas-based tool that allows users to paint or erase on both the silhouette and pattern canvases. The edited canvas is subsequently converted into a 2D point cloud via area sampling and forwarded to GPF for various guided generation tasks. C Additional Results C.1 Ablation Study on Particles-to-Pattern Flow We...

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    shirt, no waistband, asymmetric circle skirt, symmetric top, turtleneck, circular collar, curved armhole, with sleeve, banded sleeve cuff

    The left shows the original garment generated using GPF. The left shows garments generated after editing the input sewing pattern, with red paint in- dicating users’ input. The results show that our generated garments closely follow users’ edits to the 2D sewing pattern, while filling in missing details when the input is coarse. We optionally use text as ...

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    For a more detailed analysis, we also conduct a VLM study, adapting the setup from GPTEval3D [Wu et al

    Our method achieves the highest score, indicating overall better alignment with text prompt, physical plausibility, and aesthetics compared with the baselines. For a more detailed analysis, we also conduct a VLM study, adapting the setup from GPTEval3D [Wu et al. 2024] to evaluate the same three SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angele...

    2024

  59. [59]

    For example, while Chatgarment is second-best in physi- cal plausibility, its text-prompt alignment is poor

    We see that the general ranking trend aligns with that from the human study, but reveals variations in the baselines when evaluating the three criteria separately. For example, while Chatgarment is second-best in physi- cal plausibility, its text-prompt alignment is poor. In the meantime, De- sign2GarmentCode achieves a good balance among the three criter...

    work page arXiv 2026