pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26737 · v1 · pith:ZO26XDC4new · submitted 2026-05-26 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ex· hep-ph· nucl-ex

Cumulants of mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow in the hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions

Tribhuban Parida , Piotr Bo\.zek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 16:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-exhep-phnucl-ex
keywords cumulantsmean transverse momentumelliptic flowhydrodynamic modelheavy-ion collisionsinitial-state predictorsharmonic flow moments
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hydrodynamic simulations of heavy-ion collisions satisfy derived quantitative relations between cumulants of mean transverse momentum and moments of elliptic flow.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes higher-order cumulants linking mean transverse momentum to elliptic flow inside a relativistic viscous hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions. These results are compared against event-by-event predictors built directly from the initial-state entropy distribution, which match the centrality dependence of the cumulants. The authors derive explicit quantitative relations connecting the cumulants of mean transverse momentum to different moments of the harmonic flow; the full hydrodynamic runs obey these relations to high accuracy. The relations therefore supply a direct experimental test for whether the observed correlations arise from collective hydrodynamic evolution.

Core claim

The cumulants of mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow in the hydrodynamic model obey the derived quantitative relations with moments of the harmonic flow, and the hydrodynamic simulations satisfy those relations very well.

What carries the argument

Event-by-event predictors constructed from the initial-state entropy distribution, which map initial geometry to final-state cumulants and thereby encode the centrality dependence.

If this is right

  • The derived relations provide an experimental signature for the collective hydrodynamic origin of mean-pT and flow correlations.
  • The initial-state predictors quantitatively reproduce the centrality trends seen in the full hydrodynamic calculation.
  • The same relations can be checked order-by-order for higher harmonics or other flow coefficients.
  • Deviations from the relations would indicate the presence of non-collective contributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the relations are confirmed in data, they constrain the allowed range of initial-state fluctuations more tightly than flow moments alone.
  • The approach can be extended to test whether the same relations survive when viscosity or other transport coefficients are varied.
  • A direct comparison with non-hydrodynamic models (e.g., transport or cascade) would show whether the relations are unique to collective expansion.

Load-bearing premise

That predictors built from the initial entropy distribution capture the full centrality dependence of the higher cumulants after complete hydrodynamic evolution.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement of the same cumulants in heavy-ion data that deviates systematically from the predicted quantitative relations with flow moments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26737 by Piotr Bo\.zek, Tribhuban Parida.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The scaled cumulants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Scaled cumulants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of the hydrodynamic-model results (solid lines with markers) with predictions based on estimators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Higher order cumulants between the mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow are calculated in a relativistic viscous hydrodynamic model of relativistic heavy-ion collisions. The results of the hydrodynamic simulations are compared with calculations using event-by-event predictors of the final collective observables constructed from the initial state entropy distribution. The predictors describes quantitatively centrality dependence of the higher cumulants considered in the paper. We derive a quantitative relations between the cumulants of the mean transverse momentum and different moments of the harmonic flow. The hydrodynamic simulations satisfy those relation very well. Those relations could be used to test experimentally the collective origin of the observed correlations between the mean transverse momentum and harmonic flow.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates higher-order cumulants involving the mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow v_2 within a relativistic viscous hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions. Hydrodynamic results are compared to event-by-event predictors constructed from the initial-state entropy distribution; these predictors are reported to capture the centrality dependence of the cumulants quantitatively. The authors derive explicit quantitative relations linking the cumulants of mean p_T to moments of the harmonic flow and demonstrate that the hydrodynamic simulations satisfy these relations to high accuracy. The relations are proposed as an experimental test of the collective hydrodynamic origin of the observed correlations.

Significance. If the derived relations hold under viscous hydrodynamic evolution, they furnish a largely model-independent diagnostic for the collective character of p_T–flow correlations that can be confronted directly with experimental multi-particle cumulants. The quantitative success of initial-state entropy predictors for higher-order cumulants reinforces the utility of such predictors beyond mean values and strengthens the connection between initial geometry fluctuations and final-state observables. The work therefore supplies both a theoretical benchmark and a practical experimental handle in the study of collective dynamics in heavy-ion collisions.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the sentence 'The predictors describes quantitatively centrality dependence...' contains a subject-verb agreement error ('describes' should be 'describe').
  2. [Results section (near the statement on satisfaction of relations)] The manuscript states that the hydrodynamic simulations 'satisfy those relation very well,' but does not specify a quantitative metric (e.g., relative deviation or χ² per degree of freedom) or identify the figure/table that displays the comparison; this should be added for reproducibility.
  3. [Section introducing the cumulant definitions] Notation for the higher-order cumulants (e.g., whether they are normalized or un-normalized) should be defined explicitly at first use, as conventions differ across the heavy-ion literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the detailed summary, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives quantitative relations between cumulants of mean pT and moments of harmonic flow from general hydrodynamic considerations, then verifies them via independent viscous hydro simulations and separate initial-state entropy predictors. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed input; the satisfaction of the relations is presented as a numerical outcome of the evolution rather than an algebraic identity. The central claim therefore rests on external verification against simulations and is not forced by the paper's own definitions or prior self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard assumption that relativistic viscous hydrodynamics models the collective evolution, plus numerical choices for initial conditions and viscosity parameters typical in the field.

free parameters (2)
  • shear and bulk viscosity coefficients
    Standard parameters in viscous hydro models that are usually tuned to data or chosen within ranges.
  • initial entropy deposition parameters
    Event-by-event initial conditions involve model parameters for entropy fluctuations.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics provides an accurate description of the space-time evolution in heavy-ion collisions.
    Invoked as the basis for all simulation results.
  • domain assumption Initial-state entropy distributions can be used to construct reliable event-by-event predictors for final-state collective observables.
    Central to the comparison performed in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5639 in / 1285 out tokens · 42859 ms · 2026-07-01T16:02:53.522920+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (solid line), ρ2,1([pT ], v2

  2. [2]

    (dashed line with squares),ρ 3,1([pT ], v2

  3. [3]

    (dot- ted line),ρ 1,2([pT ], v2

  4. [4]

    withT ±(x, y) denoting the thickness functions of the pro- jectile and target participants, respectively

    (dashed line with stars),ρ 13([pT ], v2 2) (dashed line with diamonds), calculated in the relativistic hy- drodynamic model for Pb+Pb collisions as a function of col- lision centrality. withT ±(x, y) denoting the thickness functions of the pro- jectile and target participants, respectively. Centrality classification is performed using minimum-bias T RENTo...

  5. [5]

    The scaled cumulants of [pT ]2 and [p T ]3 are small in semicentral collisions, but become negative in peripheral collisions

    are consistent with other calculations and measurements [30, 31, 34, 54]. The scaled cumulants of [pT ]2 and [p T ]3 are small in semicentral collisions, but become negative in peripheral collisions. This behavior is qualitatively consistent with results from the AMPT transport model shown in Ref. [43]. The scaled cumu- lantsρ 1,2([pT ], v2

  6. [6]

    This is qualitatively consistent with preliminary results from the CMS Collaboration [55] and with AMPT results [43]

    are approximately proportional and of the same sign asρ1,1([pT ], v2 2). This is qualitatively consistent with preliminary results from the CMS Collaboration [55] and with AMPT results [43]. In Sec. IV, we derive, using a simple model, quantitative re- lations between the cumulantsρ 1,k([pT ], v2

  7. [7]

    Those relations explains their relative magnitudes and signs found in the numerical simulations

    (k= 1,2,3). Those relations explains their relative magnitudes and signs found in the numerical simulations. IV. RELA TION BETWEEN THE CUMULANT OF THE SECOND AND FIRST ORDER INv 2 2 Assuming a Gaussian distribution of eccentricity fluc- tuations around the geometric deformation of the interac- tion region, the event-by-event elliptic-flow distribution can...

  8. [8]

    The presence of correlations between the elliptic flow and the mean transverse momentum modifies the averages of the v2 andpvariables

    =A e − (p−˜p)2 2s2p + κ(v2 −v2 0 −2s2 v)(p−˜p) sp s2v B(v2),(29) assuming a Gaussian distribution inp, with a term in the exponent that correlatespandv 2 with strengthκ. The presence of correlations between the elliptic flow and the mean transverse momentum modifies the averages of the v2 andpvariables. The normalization coefficient is A= 1√ 2πsp 1 +κ 2 2...

  9. [9]

    (solid line), ρ1,2([pT ], v2

  10. [10]

    The dotteded lines represent the estimates ofρ 1,2 andρ 1,3 obtained fromρ 1,1 using the scaling relations (38) and (39)

    (dashed line with stars), andρ 1,3([pT ], v2 2) (dashed line with diamonds) calculated in the relativistic hy- drodynamic model for Pb+Pb collisions as a function of col- lision centrality. The dotteded lines represent the estimates ofρ 1,2 andρ 1,3 obtained fromρ 1,1 using the scaling relations (38) and (39). ⟨v2⟩=v 2 0 + 2s2 v +O(κ 2),(32) c{4}4 =−v 4 0...

  11. [11]

    The results in Fig

    for the elliptic flow are of the same sign as the lowest order cumulant ρ1,1(p, v2). The results in Fig. 2 show that the relation Eq. (38) is approximately fulfilled by the hydrodynamic model results. The ratios of the cumulants of different order invtakes the form ⟨[pT ]V 2V ⋆2⟩c ⟨[pT ]v2⟩c =− 4v{4}4 ⟨v2⟩+v{4} 2 +O(κ 2) (40) and ⟨[pT ]V 3V ⋆3⟩c ⟨[pT ]v2⟩...

  12. [12]

    [panel (b)],ρ 3,1([pT ], v2

  13. [13]

    [panel (c)],ρ 1,2([pT ], v2

  14. [14]

    [panel (d)], andρ 1,3([pT ], v2

  15. [15]

    Estimates using predictors [Eq

    [panel (e)]. Estimates using predictors [Eq. (49)] and [Eq. (50)] are shown with dashed, and dotted lines, respectively. transverse plane, [m] = R m(x, y)s(x, y)dxdyR s(x, y)dxdy .(44) The moments of the initial density used are defined as S= Z s(x, y)dxdy ,(45) ϵ2 2 = [x2 −y 2] [x2 +y 2] 2 + [2xy] [x2 +y 2] 2 ,(46) Rk = [(x2 +y 2)k/2]1/k ,(47) and A= p [...

  16. [16]

    3, panel (a)]

    is reproduced qualitatively by all formulas [Fig. 3, panel (a)]. The hydrodynamic-model re- sults for the cumulantρ 2,1([pT ], v2

  17. [17]

    3, panel (b)]

    are also reproduced qualitatively the predictors [Fig. 3, panel (b)]. All of them show a change of sign as a function of centrality. However, the predictors do not reproduce well the hy- drodynamic results for the cumulantρ3,1([pT ], v2

  18. [18]

    3, panel (c)]

    [Fig. 3, panel (c)]. Only the simplest predictor [Eq. (49)], shows a change of sign, but its centrality dependence is too steep compared with the hydrodynamic simulations. The cen- trality dependence of the fourth and six-order cumulants 6 in elliptic flow,ρ 1,2([pT ], v2

  19. [19]

    3, panels (d) and (e)]

    is repro- duced qualitatively by the predictors [Fig. 3, panels (d) and (e)]. It is expected for any predictor reproducing the lowest oreder scaled cumulantρ 1,1([pT ], v2 2), due to the relations (38) and (39). The linear approximation for the mean transverse mo- mentum can be improved further by including higher mo- ments of the initial density [57, 58]...

  20. [20]

    andρ 1,3([pT ], v2 2) are of the same order as lowest-order cumulant ρ1,1([pT ], v2 2). Assuming a simple Gaussian form for the joint probability distribution of [p T ] andv 2 2, we derive a simple relation between these the scaled cumulants of [pt] and higher orders ofv 2. This relation is very well reproduced by the hydrodynamic-model results. It would ...

    2023

  21. [21]

    Phenomenology of the little bang

    J.-Y. Ollitrault, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.312, 012002 (2011), arXiv:1008.3323 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci.63, 123 (2013), arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon, and B. Schenke, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A28, 1340011 (2013), arXiv:1301.5893 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    S. A. Voloshin, V. Koch, and H. G. Ritter, Phys. Rev. C60, 024901 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9903060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  25. [25]

    Event-wise mean p_t fluctuations in Au-Au collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 130 GeV

    J. Adamset al.(STAR), Phys. Rev. C71, 064906 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0308033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  26. [26]

    B. B. Abelevet al.(ALICE), Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3077 (2014), arXiv:1407.5530 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Transverse Momentum Fluctuations in Nuclear Collisions at 158 AGeV

    T. Anticicet al.(NA49), Phys. Rev. C70, 034902 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0311009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  28. [28]

    Gavin, Phys

    S. Gavin, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 162301 (2004), nucl- th/0308067

    work page arXiv 2004

  29. [29]

    Size fluctuations of the initial source and the event-by-event transverse momentum fluctuations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    W. Broniowski, M. Chojnacki, and L. Obara, Phys. Rev. C80, 051902(R) (2009), arXiv:0907.3216 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    I. J. Abualrobet al.(ALICE), JHEP11, 076 (2025), arXiv:2506.10394 [nucl-ex]. 7

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 032301 (2026), arXiv:2503.24125 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Jia, Phys

    J. Jia, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 112301 (2026), arXiv:2507.14399 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Parida, R

    T. Parida, R. Samanta, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Lett. B857, 138985 (2024), arXiv:2407.17313 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 252301 (2024), arXiv:2407.06413 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    New method for measuring azimuthal distributions in nucleus-nucleus collisions

    N. Borghini, P. M. Dinh, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C63, 054906 (2001), nucl-th/0007063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  36. [36]

    Flow analysis from multiparticle azimuthal correlations

    N. Borghini, P. M. Dinh, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys.Rev. C64, 054901 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0105040 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    Elliptic flow from two- and four-particle correlations in Au + Au collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 130 GeV

    C. Adleret al.(STAR), Phys. Rev. C66, 034904 (2002), arXiv:nucl-ex/0206001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  38. [38]

    Higher harmonic anisotropic flow measurements of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV

    K. Aamodtet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 032301 (2011), arXiv:1105.3865 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Measurement of flow harmonics with multi-particle cumulants in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3157 (2014), arXiv:1408.4342 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [40]

    Multiplicity and transverse-momentum dependence of two- and four-particle correlations in pPb and PbPb collisions

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Phys. Lett. B724, 213 (2013), arXiv:1305.0609 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Generic framework for anisotropic flow analyses with multi-particle azimuthal correlations

    A. Bilandzic, C. H. Christensen, K. Gulbrandsen, A. Hansen, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C89, 064904 (2014), arXiv:1312.3572 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Non linearities in the harmonic spectrum of heavy ion collisions with ideal and viscous hydrodynamics

    D. Teaney and L. Yan, Phys. Rev.C86, 044908 (2012), arXiv:1206.1905 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    Measurement of event-plane correlations in sqrt(s_NN)=2.76 TeV lead-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev.C90, 024905 (2014), arXiv:1403.0489 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Correlated event-by-event fluctuations of flow harmonics in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}=2.76$ TeV

    J. Adamet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 182301 (2016), arXiv:1604.07663 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    J. Qian, U. W. Heinz, and J. Liu, Phys. Rev.C93, 064901 (2016), arXiv:1602.02813 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    X. Zhu, Y. Zhou, H. Xu, and H. Song, Phys. Rev.C95, 044902 (2017), arXiv:1608.05305 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    F. G. Gardim, F. Grassi, M. Luzum, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Phys. Rev.C95, 034901 (2017), arXiv:1608.02982 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Hydrodynamic event-plane correlations in Pb+Pb collisions at sqrt(s)=2.76ATeV

    Z. Qiu and U. Heinz, Phys. Lett.B717, 261 (2012), arXiv:1208.1200 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Transverse momentum-flow correlations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. Bo˙ zek, Phys. Rev.C93, 044908 (2016), arXiv:1601.04513 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Shen, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C102, 034905 (2020), arXiv:2004.00690 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Eur

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. C79, 985 (2019), arXiv:1907.05176 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Giacalone, Phys

    G. Giacalone, Phys. Rev. C102, 024901 (2020), arXiv:2004.14463 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Giacalone, F

    G. Giacalone, F. G. Gardim, J. Noronha-Hostler, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C103, 024909 (2021), arXiv:2004.01765 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    J. Jia, S. Huang, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C105, 014906 (2022), arXiv:2105.05713 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Bally, M

    B. Bally, M. Bender, G. Giacalone, and V. Som` a, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 082301 (2022), arXiv:2108.09578 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    N. M. Fortier, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C111, L011901 (2025), arXiv:2405.17526 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Giacaloneet al., Phys

    G. Giacaloneet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 012302 (2025), arXiv:2402.05995 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Nature635, 67 (2024), arXiv:2401.06625 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    P. Li, B. Zhou, and G.-L. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 082302 (2026), arXiv:2504.04688 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Tumasyanet al.(CMS), (2024), arXiv:2410.04578 [nucl-ex]

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), (2024), arXiv:2410.04578 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Bo˙ zek and R

    P. Bo˙ zek and R. Samanta, Phys. Rev. C104, 014905 (2021), arXiv:2103.15338 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Lett. B834, 137393 (2022), arXiv:2111.06106 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    E. G. D. Nielsen, N. Nathanson, K. Gulbrandsen, and Y. Zhou, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1016 (2025), arXiv:2504.03044 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Zhao, H.-j

    S. Zhao, H.-j. Xu, Y. Zhou, Y.-X. Liu, and H. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 192301 (2024), arXiv:2403.07441 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Giacalone, Eur

    G. Giacalone, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 297 (2023), arXiv:2305.19843 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Mehrabpour, G

    H. Mehrabpour, G. Giacalone, and M. W. Luzum, (2026), arXiv:2604.00619 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Parida, R

    T. Parida, R. Samanta, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Lett. B868, 139729 (2025), arXiv:2506.18690 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    3+1D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C82, 014903 (2010), arXiv:1004.1408 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  69. [69]

    Elliptic and triangular flow in event-by-event (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamics

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 042301 (2011), arXiv:1009.3244 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  70. [70]

    The production of photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    J.-F. Paquet, C. Shen, G. S. Denicol, M. Luzum, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C93, 044906 (2016), arXiv:1509.06738 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    J. S. Moreland, J. E. Bernhard, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C92, 011901(R) (2015), arXiv:1412.4708 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    J. S. Moreland, J. E. Bernhard, and S. A. Bass, (2018), arXiv:1808.02106 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    J. S. Moreland and R. A. Soltz, Phys. Rev. C93, 044913 (2016), arXiv:1512.02189 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [74]

    Bo˙ zek and H

    P. Bo˙ zek and H. Mehrabpour, Phys. Rev. C101, 064902 (2020), arXiv:2002.08832 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Tuo (CMS), Acta Phys

    S. Tuo (CMS), Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.16, 67 (2023)

    2023

  76. [76]

    S. A. Voloshin, A. M. Poskanzer, A. Tang, and G. Wang, Phys. Lett.B659, 537 (2008), arXiv:0708.0800 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    Triangularity and Dipole Asymmetry in Heavy Ion Collisions

    D. Teaney and L. Yan, Phys. Rev.C83, 064904 (2011), arXiv:1010.1876 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  78. [78]

    Fluctuations of harmonic and radial flow in heavy ion collisions with principal components

    A. Mazeliauskas and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev.C93, 024913 (2016), arXiv:1509.07492 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [79]

    Zhang, A

    C. Zhang, A. Behera, S. Bhatta, and J. Jia, Phys. Lett. B822, 136702 (2021), arXiv:2102.05200 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Cumulants of mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow in the hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions [data set]. zenodo,

    T. Parida and P. Bozek, “Cumulants of mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow in the hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions [data set]. zenodo,” (2026)

    2026