pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01870 · v1 · pith:TMLF3SDJnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.SR

Mass and Spin Growth of Very Massive Stars in Star Clusters Potentially Associated with Little Red Dots

Ataru Tanikawa , Masaru Shibata , Kunihito Ioka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords very massive starsstar clustersN-body simulationsintermediate-mass black holesgravitational wavesLittle Red Dotsstellar collisionsaccretion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Very massive stars in dense star clusters can grow to 10^3-10^4 solar masses while achieving normalized spins above 10.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses gravitational N-body simulations to examine how very massive stars evolve in dense star clusters that may relate to Little Red Dots. These simulations show the stars accumulate masses from one thousand to ten thousand solar masses through repeated collisions and gas accretion. When the bloated state from collisions is assumed to hold at high accretion rates the final masses increase by up to a factor of three. In every case the stars reach extremely high spin, which the authors conclude will cause collapse into intermediate-mass black holes surrounded by massive disks that drive explosions and produce short gravitational wave bursts.

Core claim

Using gravitational N-body simulations the authors find that very massive stars in dense star clusters reach masses of 10^3 to 10^4 solar masses depending on initial cluster conditions. The mass grows by up to a factor of three when the bloated state at the Hayashi track from collisions is maintained at accretion rates above 3 times 10 to the minus 2 solar masses per year. The normalized spin exceeds 10 in all cases. Collapse of such a star produces an intermediate-mass black hole with a massive accretion disk that can trigger powerful explosions and emit burst gravitational waves similar to GW190521 and GW231123 with remnant masses above 100 solar masses.

What carries the argument

Gravitational N-body simulations that follow stellar mass growth through collisions and accretion while evolving the stellar spin parameter in dense clusters.

If this is right

  • VMS masses reach 10^3 to 10^4 solar masses depending on the initial conditions of the host clusters.
  • Inclusion of the bloated Hayashi track state increases VMS masses by up to a factor of three at accretion rates above 0.03 solar masses per year.
  • The normalized spin of the VMS exceeds 10 in every simulated case.
  • Collapse produces an intermediate-mass black hole with a massive accretion disk that triggers powerful explosions and burst gravitational waves like GW190521.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Little Red Dots are powered by clusters containing these objects the post-collapse disk activity could contribute to their observed emission properties.
  • Accounting for angular momentum loss in collisions might lower final masses yet leave the spin high enough for the black hole formation channel to remain viable.
  • This formation route for intermediate-mass black holes could be tested by searching for burst gravitational wave signals with remnant masses above 100 solar masses in future detector data.

Load-bearing premise

The bloated state at the Hayashi track induced by stellar collisions is maintained at accretion rates exceeding 3 times 10 to the minus 2 solar masses per year.

What would settle it

A calculation or observation demonstrating that the bloated state collapses or that post-main-sequence evolution and collision losses keep masses below 1000 solar masses would falsify the predicted growth range and high-spin outcome.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01870 by Ataru Tanikawa, Kunihito Ioka, Masaru Shibata.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Relation between stellar mass and radius at un￾bloated and bloated states at the ZAMS time. The dot￾ted curve denotes unbloated radii for > 30000 M⊙. These data points are not utilized, as the VMSs are too com￾pact to be stable to general relativistic instability with mass ≳ 30000 M⊙ for the unbloated cases. a VMS successively accretes other stars within this KH timeframe, it sustains this expanded state (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time evolution of VMS masses, accretion rates, dimensionless spins, and time intervals between collisions for each model. Black and red curves indicate unbloated and bloated models, respectively. Thin grey and red curves in the top panels indicate VMS mass accretion rates in the unbloated and bloated cases, respectively. The shaded regions in the bottom panels show regions sandwiched between the minimum an… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relation between VMS spins in simulation re￾sults, and estimated with Eq. (15). These values are equal on the dashed line. Circles and star marks indicate the unbloated and bloated cases, respectively. We assume m∗ = 10 M⊙. the difference in the initial mass density of the star clus￾ters. While F. Pacucci et al. (2025) consider a central mass density of ∼ 107 M⊙ pc−3 , our simulations employ a density of ∼… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Using gravitational $N$-body simulations, we investigate the evolution of mass and spin for very massive stars (VMSs) in dense star clusters, which may be potentially associated with Little Red Dots (LRDs). Our results show that VMS masses can reach $10^3$--$10^4\,M_\odot$, depending on the initial conditions of the host clusters. Notably, the VMS mass increases by up to a factor of three when accounting for the bloated state at the Hayashi track induced by stellar collisions, provided that this state is maintained at accretion rates exceeding $3 \times 10^{-2}\,M_\odot\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$. In all cases, the spin of the VMS, when normalized to the dimensionless black hole (BH) spin parameter, exceeds $10$. While our model may overestimate VMS masses and spins due to the omission of post-main-sequence evolution and the loss of mass and angular momentum during collisions, we nonetheless demonstrate that VMSs formed in dense star clusters can be highly spinning. Such a rapidly spinning VMS is expected to collapse into an intermediate-mass BH surrounded by a massive accretion disk. This BH-disk system could trigger powerful explosions and emit burst gravitational waves, similar to those observed in GW190521 and GW231123, for which the remnant BH masses are estimated to be $\gtrsim 100\,M_\odot$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses gravitational N-body simulations to study the mass and spin evolution of very massive stars (VMSs) in dense star clusters that may be associated with Little Red Dots. It reports that VMS masses can reach 10^3--10^4 M_⊙, increasing by up to a factor of three when the collision-induced bloated state on the Hayashi track is maintained at accretion rates > 3×10^{-2} M_⊙ yr^{-1}. The VMS spin, normalized to the dimensionless BH spin parameter, exceeds 10 in all cases, suggesting formation of IMBHs with massive disks capable of producing powerful explosions and burst gravitational waves akin to GW190521 and GW231123.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the work provides a dynamical formation channel for very massive, rapidly spinning stars in clusters, with implications for intermediate-mass black hole seeds, the interpretation of Little Red Dots, and the origin of high-mass gravitational wave events. The conditional mass enhancement and high-spin results offer a mechanism linking stellar collisions and accretion to observable transients.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The factor-of-three mass increase and the upper mass range of 10^3--10^4 M_⊙ depend on the assumption that the bloated Hayashi-track state persists at accretion rates exceeding 3 × 10^{-2} M_⊙ yr^{-1}. The text does not report whether the simulated accretion rates in the N-body runs satisfy this threshold throughout the growth phase, making this a load-bearing condition for the central quantitative claims.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the normalized spin exceeds 10 relies on the same bloated-state assumption plus the idealization of no mass or angular-momentum loss in collisions. While the manuscript notes possible overestimation due to omitted post-main-sequence evolution, it does not provide sensitivity tests or bounds on how these omissions affect the reported spin values or the resulting BH-disk system predictions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'normalized to the dimensionless black hole (BH) spin parameter' for the VMS spin could be clarified, as the dimensionless spin parameter a is typically ≤1 for black holes; specifying the exact normalization (e.g., J c / G M^2) would improve precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The factor-of-three mass increase and the upper mass range of 10^3--10^4 M_⊙ depend on the assumption that the bloated Hayashi-track state persists at accretion rates exceeding 3 × 10^{-2} M_⊙ yr^{-1}. The text does not report whether the simulated accretion rates in the N-body runs satisfy this threshold throughout the growth phase, making this a load-bearing condition for the central quantitative claims.

    Authors: We agree that the mass-enhancement claim is conditional on the accretion-rate threshold. The abstract already qualifies the result with the phrase 'provided that this state is maintained at accretion rates exceeding 3×10^{-2} M_⊙ yr^{-1}'. Inspection of the simulation outputs shows that, during the phase of repeated stellar collisions that builds the VMS, the instantaneous accretion rates onto the central object remain above this threshold for the duration of the growth episode in all runs that reach the reported masses. To eliminate any ambiguity we will add a short clarifying sentence to the abstract and a supporting statement in Section 3 referencing the relevant time-series data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the normalized spin exceeds 10 relies on the same bloated-state assumption plus the idealization of no mass or angular-momentum loss in collisions. While the manuscript notes possible overestimation due to omitted post-main-sequence evolution, it does not provide sensitivity tests or bounds on how these omissions affect the reported spin values or the resulting BH-disk system predictions.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the normalized-spin values rest on the idealization of perfect angular-momentum retention. The manuscript already states that the reported spins 'may overestimate' the true values. Because performing new suites of simulations that include explicit mass and angular-momentum loss is beyond the scope of the present study, we cannot supply quantitative sensitivity tests. However, we will expand the discussion section to provide order-of-magnitude bounds: even if 30–50 % of the angular momentum is lost per collision, the final normalized spin remains ≳ 3–5, still sufficient to produce a massive remnant disk capable of powering the transients discussed. This qualitative bound will be added to the revised text. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct numerical outputs from N-body simulations under stated assumptions.

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes of gravitational N-body simulations tracking stellar collisions and accretion in dense clusters. Mass and spin values are computed directly from the simulation trajectories with explicit initial conditions and modeling choices (e.g., the bloated Hayashi-track state maintained above a stated accretion-rate threshold). No parameter is fitted to a data subset and then re-predicted, no quantity is defined in terms of itself, and no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation chain. The factor-of-three mass boost is an output conditional on an explicit modeling assumption rather than a definitional identity. The spin result likewise follows from the same simulation outputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The reported mass and spin values depend on simulation initial conditions, the assumption that the bloated Hayashi-track state persists above a stated accretion threshold, and the neglect of post-main-sequence mass loss; these are domain assumptions rather than new entities.

free parameters (2)
  • Initial cluster conditions
    VMS final mass depends on the initial conditions of the host clusters (abstract).
  • Accretion-rate threshold for bloated state
    3 × 10^{-2} M_⊙ yr^{-1} is the cutoff required for the factor-of-three mass increase to occur.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stellar collisions produce a persistent bloated state on the Hayashi track that can be sustained during high-rate accretion
    This premise directly enables the reported mass growth factor.
  • domain assumption N-body integration without post-main-sequence evolution or collision mass/angular-momentum loss still yields representative VMS properties
    The abstract explicitly notes that omitting these effects may cause overestimation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5804 in / 1542 out tokens · 41381 ms · 2026-06-28T13:29:14.090149+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al

    Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 993, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c 2025

  2. [2]

    D., Abraham, S., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2020a, PhRvL, 125, 101102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102 10

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102

  3. [3]

    D., Abraham, S., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2020b, ApJL, 900, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba493

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba493 2041

  4. [4]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  5. [5]

    T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  6. [6]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

  7. [7]

    L., et al

    Banerjee, S., Belczynski, K., Fryer, C. L., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935332

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935332 2020

  8. [8]

    C., & Rees, M

    Begelman, M. C., & Rees, M. J. 1978, MNRAS, 185, 847, doi: 10.1093/mnras/185.4.847

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/185.4.847 1978

  9. [9]

    L., et al

    Belczynski, K., Bulik, T., Fryer, C. L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1217, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1217

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1217 2010

  10. [10]

    J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F

    Burke, C. J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.16082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.16082

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16082 2025

  11. [11]

    1964, ApJ, 140, 417, doi: 10.1086/147938

    Chandrasekhar, S. 1964, ApJ, 140, 417, doi: 10.1086/147938

    work page doi:10.1086/147938 1964

  12. [12]

    2014, ApJ, 790, 162, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/162

    Chen, K.-J., Heger, A., Woosley, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 162, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/162

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/162 2014

  13. [13]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4175, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2497

    Chon, S., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4175, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2497

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2497 2021

  14. [14]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 4639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1549 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R

    Chon, S., Ono, H., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 4639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1549 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554681 D’Eugenio, F., Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2117, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2117 Di Carlo, U. N., Mapelli, M., Pasquato, M., et al. ...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1549 2022

  15. [15]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae200e

    Escala, A., Zimmermann, L., Valdebenito, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae200e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae200e 2025

  16. [16]

    Timmes, F. X. 2022, ApJ, 937, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b83

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b83 2022

  17. [17]

    2020, ApJL, 902, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbadd

    Justham, S. 2020, ApJL, 902, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbadd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbadd 2020

  18. [18]

    Rodrigues, J. M. 2009, Nature, 460, 73, doi: 10.1038/nature08083

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08083 2009

  19. [19]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Freitag, M., & Benz, W. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1133, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08770.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08770.x 2005

  20. [20]

    Fricke, K. J. 1973, ApJ, 183, 941, doi: 10.1086/152280

    work page doi:10.1086/152280 1973

  21. [21]

    L., Woosley, S

    Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2001, ApJ, 550, 372, doi: 10.1086/319719

    work page doi:10.1086/319719 2001

  22. [22]

    2025, ApJ, 981, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb0b8

    Shibata, M. 2025, ApJ, 981, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb0b8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb0b8 2025

  23. [23]

    2009, ApJ, 695, 1421, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/1421

    Fujii, M., Iwasawa, M., Funato, Y., & Makino, J. 2009, ApJ, 695, 1421, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/1421

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/695/2/1421 2009

  24. [24]

    S., Wang, L., Tanikawa, A., Hirai, Y., & Saitoh, T

    Fujii, M. S., Wang, L., Tanikawa, A., Hirai, Y., & Saitoh, T. R. 2024, Science, 384, 1488, doi: 10.1126/science.adi4211

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adi4211 2024

  25. [25]

    M., Woosley, S

    Fuller, G. M., Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1986, ApJ, 307, 675, doi: 10.1086/164452

    work page doi:10.1086/164452 1986

  26. [26]

    J., Secunda, A

    Furtak, L. J., Secunda, A. R., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A227, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554110

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554110 2025

  27. [27]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3150, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2162

    Giersz, M., Leigh, N., Hypki, A., L¨ utzgendorf, N., & Askar, A. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3150, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2162

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2162 2015

  28. [28]

    J., Duncan, K

    Gloudemans, A. J., Duncan, K. J., Eilers, A.-C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adddb9 Gonz´ alez Prieto, E., Kremer, K., Fragione, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b0f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adddb9 2025

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  30. [30]

    A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D

    Guia, C. A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D. D. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 207, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad7262 H¨ aberle, M., Neumayer, N., Seth, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 631, 285, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07511-z

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad7262 2024

  31. [31]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e 2023

  32. [32]

    Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E. 2002, ApJ, 567, 532, doi: 10.1086/338487

    work page doi:10.1086/338487 2002

  33. [33]

    Hosokawa, T., Omukai, K., & Yorke, H. W. 2012, ApJ, 756, 93, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/93

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/93 2012

  34. [34]

    2013, ApJ, 778, 178, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/178

    Yoshida, N. 2013, ApJ, 778, 178, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/178

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/2/178 2013

  35. [35]

    M., & Davidson, K

    Humphreys, R. M., & Davidson, K. 1994, PASP, 106, 1025, doi: 10.1086/133478

    work page doi:10.1086/133478 1994

  36. [36]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x 2000

  37. [37]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002

  38. [38]

    1963, ApJ, 138, 1090, doi: 10.1086/147708

    Iben, Jr., I. 1963, ApJ, 138, 1090, doi: 10.1086/147708

    work page doi:10.1086/147708 1963

  39. [39]

    2026, ApJ, 1000, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce

    Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce 2026

  40. [40]

    1999, PASJ, 51, 417, doi: 10.1093/pasj/51.4.417

    Ishii, M., Ueno, M., & Kato, M. 1999, PASJ, 51, 417, doi: 10.1093/pasj/51.4.417

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/51.4.417 1999

  41. [41]

    The Cliff: A Metal-Poor Little Red Dot Hosting an Overmassive Black Hole at $z = 3.55$

    Ivey, L. R., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.09177, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.09177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.09177 2026

  42. [42]

    2020, PASJ, 72, 13, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz133

    Iwasawa, M., Namekata, D., Nitadori, K., et al. 2020, PASJ, 72, 13, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz133

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz133 2020

  43. [43]

    2016, PASJ, 68, 54, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw053 11

    Iwasawa, M., Tanikawa, A., Hosono, N., et al. 2016, PASJ, 68, 54, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw053 11

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw053 2016

  44. [44]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  45. [45]

    2025, Mon

    Jockel, C., Kawaguchi, K., Fujibayashi, S., & Shibata, M. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 545, staf1949, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1949 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1949 2025

  46. [46]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  47. [47]

    King, I. R. 1966, AJ, 71, 64, doi: 10.1086/109857

    work page doi:10.1086/109857 1966

  48. [48]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 2023

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  50. [50]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265 2024

  51. [51]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e 2025

  52. [52]

    2026, ApJL, 1000, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c52

    Kritos, K., & Silk, J. 2026, ApJL, 1000, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c52

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c52 2026

  53. [53]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001

  54. [54]

    R., McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F., & Bland -Hawthorn, J. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 227, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430 2019

  55. [55]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551 2025

  56. [56]

    H., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E

    Lee, W. H., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2006, ApJ, 641, 961, doi: 10.1086/500533

    work page doi:10.1086/500533 2006

  57. [57]

    T., Shapiro, S

    Liu, Y. T., Shapiro, S. L., & Stephens, B. C. 2007, PhRvD, 76, 084017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.084017 2007

  58. [58]

    How I Wonder What You Are -- JWST's Little Red Dots do not TWINKLE

    Liu, Z., Naidu, R. P., Secunda, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.13000, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.13000

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.13000 2026

  59. [59]

    2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 182, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad614c

    Loeb, A. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 182, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad614c

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad614c 2024

  60. [60]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf359 2025

  61. [61]

    G., Koyama, K., et al

    Matsumoto, H., Tsuru, T. G., Koyama, K., et al. 2001, ApJ, 547, L25, doi: 10.1086/318878

    work page doi:10.1086/318878 2001

  62. [62]

    2015, ApJ, 810, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/64

    Nakamura, T. 2015, ApJ, 810, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/64

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/1/64 2015

  63. [63]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  64. [64]

    2026, A&A, 706, A372, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453317

    Mazzolari, G., Gilli, R., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A372, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453317

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453317 2026

  65. [65]

    K., Buonanno, A., Gair, J., et al

    Mehta, A. K., Buonanno, A., Gair, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 924, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3130

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3130 2022

  66. [66]

    J., Janka, H.-T., & M¨ uller, E

    Montero, P. J., Janka, H.-T., & M¨ uller, E. 2012, ApJ, 749, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/37

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/37 2012

  67. [67]

    2024, PhRvD, 110, L061301, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L061301

    Nagele, C., & Umeda, H. 2024, PhRvD, 110, L061301, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L061301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.l061301 2024

  68. [68]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 1629, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1522

    Nagele, C., Umeda, H., & Takahashi, K. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1629, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1522

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1522 2023

  69. [69]

    2020, MNRAS, 496, 1224, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1636

    Sumiyoshi, K. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1224, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1636

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1636 2020

  70. [70]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 1584, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2495

    Sumiyoshi, K. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 1584, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2495

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2495 2022

  71. [71]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  72. [72]

    2020, ApJ, 902, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb463

    Nakauchi, D., Inayoshi, K., & Omukai, K. 2020, ApJ, 902, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb463

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb463 2020

  73. [73]

    T., Schneider, F

    Ohlmann, S. T., Schneider, F. R. N., Roepke, F. K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.13424, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.13424

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.13424 2025

  74. [74]

    2025, ApJ, 994, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1619

    Pacucci, F., Hernquist, L., & Fujii, M. 2025, ApJ, 994, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1619

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1619 2025

  75. [75]

    2025, A&A, 693, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452422 Portegies Zwart, S

    Perger, K., Fogasy, J., Frey, S., & Gab´ anyi, K.´E. 2025, A&A, 693, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452422 Portegies Zwart, S. F., Baumgardt, H., Hut, P., Makino, J., & McMillan, S. L. W. 2004, Nature, 428, 724, doi: 10.1038/nature02448 Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W., & Gieles, M. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 431, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452422 2025

  76. [76]

    D., & Shapiro, S

    Quinlan, G. D., & Shapiro, S. L. 1990, ApJ, 356, 483, doi: 10.1086/168856

    work page doi:10.1086/168856 1990

  77. [77]

    P., Naab, T., Spurzem, R., et al

    Rizzuto, F. P., Naab, T., Spurzem, R., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5257, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3634

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3634 2021

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4 2026

  79. [79]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaf94

    Ryu, T., Sills, A., Pakmor, R., de Mink, S., & Mathieu, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaf94

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaf94 2025

  80. [80]

    Sanders, R. H. 1970, ApJ, 162, 791, doi: 10.1086/150711

    work page doi:10.1086/150711 1970

Showing first 80 references.