pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03016 · v1 · pith:K4SALDP3new · submitted 2026-06-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mes-hall· math-ph· math.MP

Attractive Hopfions and Bimerons in Thin Films of Chiral Magnets: Cluster Formation and Lattice Instability in the Conical Phase

Andrey O. Leonov , Takayuki Shigenaga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mes-hallmath-phmath.MP
keywords bimeronshopfionschiral magnetsconical phasesoliton interactionscluster formationlattice instabilitycholesteric fingers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bimerons attract via shell overlap to form chains while hopfion lattices lack any stable period in the conical phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines bimerons and hopfions as topological structures embedded in the conical background state of thin chiral magnet films. Isolated bimerons carry positive energy relative to this background yet attract one another through restructuring and overlap of their surrounding positive-energy shells, which promotes bound pairs and extended chains. Hopfions undergo analogous attraction that produces hexagonal clusters, driven by competition between regions of favorable and unfavorable twist. Despite these attractions, the clusters never settle at a fixed spacing because the conical spiral or the CF-1 phase steadily invades the spaces between solitons. The overall finding is a regime of attraction that stops short of long-range crystalline order.

Core claim

Although isolated bimerons possess positive eigen-energy with respect to the conical phase, they develop an attractive interaction mediated by the restructuring and partial overlap of their positive-energy shells, leading to the formation of bound pairs and extended bimeron chains. Isolated hopfions likewise exhibit an attractive interaction within the conical phase, leading to the formation of hexagonally ordered clusters. Hexagonal hopfion lattices do not exhibit an equilibrium lattice period; instead the conical spiral or the CF-1 phase progressively invades the inter-soliton regions, thereby preventing crystallization.

What carries the argument

Positive-energy shells relative to the conical state together with twist competition that mediates attraction between solitons.

If this is right

  • Bound bimeron pairs and extended chains appear even in regimes where a full periodic lattice is thermodynamically unstable.
  • Isolated hopfions form hexagonally ordered clusters inside the conical phase.
  • Hexagonal hopfion lattices possess no equilibrium lattice constant.
  • The conical spiral or CF-1 phase invades inter-soliton regions and blocks crystallization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same shell-overlap mechanism may produce finite rather than infinite clusters whose size is limited by sample boundaries.
  • The metastability window for circularized hopfions is expected to track the stability range of the parent cholesteric fingers.
  • The attraction-without-order regime could appear in confined chiral liquid crystals that support analogous conical states.

Load-bearing premise

The conical background remains the stable reference state whose energy sets the zero point for all soliton interactions, with no other phases or boundary effects taking over the energetics.

What would settle it

A simulation or thin-film experiment that tracks whether the average spacing inside a hopfion cluster stays constant or grows as the conical spiral fills the gaps between particles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03016 by Andrey O. Leonov, Takayuki Shigenaga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) Confined conical state in a thin film of thickness equal to one spiral pitch, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Internal structure and energetic properties of the CF–1 phase. (a) Representative magnetization configuration of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Energy density of the bimeron lattice as a function of the lattice period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Eigen-energies of isolated bimerons embedded in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Interaction potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Eigen-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Representative configurations of two hopfions embedded in the conical state. (a),(c) Initial states with two remotely separated hopfions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Coupled hopfion pair in a frustrated conical background [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a)). The reason is the energetic advantage of the CF– 1 phase, which tends to expand and occupy the entire inter￾hopfion region, thereby preventing the formation of a stable periodic hopfion lattice. The CF–1 phase may also intervene in the form of circu￾lar hopfions with Hopf index QH = 0, i.e., as closed, swirled first-type fingers. The driving mechanism for the emergence of this phase is the same as i… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Representative configurations of alternative hexagonal states derived from the hopfion lattice. (a) “Flower” state (point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the energetics, interactions, and ordering tendencies of bimerons (cholesteric fingers of the second type, CF--2) and hopfions in thin films of chiral magnets and chiral liquid crystals hosting a conical background state. Although isolated bimerons possess positive eigen-energy with respect to the conical phase, they develop an attractive interaction mediated by the restructuring and partial overlap of their positive-energy shells, i.e., intermediate regions formed relative to the conical state. This attraction promotes the formation of bound pairs and extended bimeron chains, even in parameter regimes where a periodic bimeron lattice is no longer thermodynamically stable. Extending the analysis to three dimensions, we show that circularization of bimerons into hopfions renders their energy finite and gives rise to a well-defined metastability window closely linked to the stability range of cholesteric fingers. Isolated hopfions likewise exhibit an attractive interaction within the conical phase, leading to the formation of hexagonally ordered clusters. The attraction originates from the competition between favorable and unfavorable twist regions and from the energetic cost of the shell structures imposed by the conical background. Despite the presence of attractive pair potentials and cluster formation, we demonstrate that hexagonal hopfion lattices do not exhibit an equilibrium lattice period. Instead, the system evolves toward states in which the conical spiral or the CF--1 phase (cholesteric fingers of the first type) progressively invade the inter-soliton regions, thereby preventing crystallization. Our results reveal a regime of attraction without stable long-range order and clarify the interplay between topology, confinement, and conical-phase frustration in chiral magnet and liquid-crystal thin films.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the energetics and interactions of bimerons (CF-2) and hopfions in thin films of chiral magnets and liquid crystals supporting a conical background state. Isolated bimerons carry positive eigen-energy relative to the conical phase yet develop attraction through restructuring and overlap of positive-energy shells, promoting bound pairs and chains. In 3D, bimeron circularization yields hopfions with finite energy and a metastability window tied to cholesteric finger stability. Isolated hopfions likewise attract, forming hexagonally ordered clusters via twist competition and shell energetics. However, hexagonal hopfion lattices lack an equilibrium period; the conical spiral or CF-1 phase invades inter-soliton regions, preventing crystallization. The work identifies a regime of attraction without stable long-range order arising from topology, confinement, and conical frustration.

Significance. If the reported energetics and invasion dynamics hold, the results establish a concrete example of attractive topological solitons that fail to crystallize due to competing background phases, clarifying the role of shell restructuring and twist energetics in confined chiral systems. The analysis of bimeron-to-hopfion circularization and the linked metastability window provides a useful bridge between 2D and 3D soliton behavior. The manuscript supplies explicit statements of the reference-state assumption and the mechanism preventing lattice formation.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction introduce CF--1 and CF--2 without a concise definition or reference to their standard topological characterization; a short paragraph or figure in §1 would improve accessibility for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. The claim that 'hexagonal hopfion lattices do not exhibit an equilibrium lattice period' is central yet presented without an explicit statement of the diagnostic used (energy minimization versus fixed-period relaxation, or comparison of chemical potential). A dedicated subsection or equation defining the criterion would strengthen the result.
  3. Numerical parameters controlling the conical background (reduced field, film thickness, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya strength) are referenced only qualitatively; tabulating the ranges explored and the criteria for stability of the reference state would allow direct reproducibility assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and accurate summary of our manuscript, as well as for the positive assessment of its significance. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no point-by-point responses to address at this stage. We are prepared to incorporate any additional suggestions from the editor or referee if they arise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives claims about bimeron/hopfion energetics, attractive interactions via shell restructuring and twist competition, cluster formation, and lattice instability directly from energy comparisons to the conical reference state. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its inputs: there are no self-definitional relations (e.g., a quantity defined in terms of its own prediction), no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes imported solely via self-citation. The conical background is an explicit modeling choice whose consequences are computed and reported without circular reduction. The derivation remains self-contained against external micromagnetic benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not specify any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work appears to rely on established models of chiral magnets and liquid crystals without detailing new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5856 in / 1237 out tokens · 25644 ms · 2026-06-28T08:32:25.459469+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The corresponding eigen-energies of these spin configurations, calculated relative to the energy of the conical state and plotted as a function of magnetic field, are shown in Fig

    Internal structure of isolated bimerons within the conical state Placement of an isolated bimeron into the conical state per- mits two distinct realizations, governed by different energetic mechanisms. The corresponding eigen-energies of these spin configurations, calculated relative to the energy of the conical state and plotted as a function of magnetic...

  2. [2]

    negative

    Origin and structure of the attractive inter-bimeron potential To quantify the CF2–CF2 interaction within the conical phase, we compute the interaction potentialsΦfor bimeron pairs, shown in Fig. 5(a), at the parameter pointk s u =20 and h=0.1, i.e., in the regime where the bimeron lattice is already unstable. The interaction potential is obtained by eval...

  3. [3]

    Manton and P

    N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe,Topological solitons(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  4. [4]

    Y . M. Shnir,Topological and non-topological solitons in scalar field theories(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    V olovik and V

    G. V olovik and V . Mineev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz73, 767 (1977)

    1977

  6. [6]

    Rajaraman,Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Soli- tons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    R. Rajaraman,Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Soli- tons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    1982

  7. [7]

    A. O. Leonov and K. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, 036001 (2026)

    2026

  8. [8]

    Faddeev and A

    L. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, Nature387, 58 (1997)

    1997

  9. [9]

    Bott and L

    R. Bott and L. W. Tu,Differential forms in algebraic topology, V ol. 82 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    Dzyaloshinskii, Sov

    I. Dzyaloshinskii, Sov. Phys. JETP19, 960 (1964)

    1964

  11. [11]

    Moriya, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    T. Moriya, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  12. [12]

    Oswald and P

    P. Oswald and P. Pieranski,Nematic and cholesteric liquid crys- tals: concepts and physical properties illustrated by experi- ments(CRC press, 2005)

    2005

  13. [13]

    Kleman and O

    M. Kleman and O. D. Lavrentovich,Soft matter physics: an introduction(Springer, 2003)

    2003

  14. [14]

    P. J. Ackerman and I. I. Smalyukh, Physical Review X7, 011006 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    N. Kent, R. Streubel, C.-H. Lambert, A. Ceballos, S.-G. Je, S. Dhuey, M.-Y . Im, F. B ¨uttner, F. Hellman, S. Salahuddin, et al., Applied Physics Letters115, 112404 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Luk’yanchuk, Y

    I. Luk’yanchuk, Y . Tikhonov, A. Razumnaya, and V . Vinokur, Nature Communications11, 2433 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    P. J. Ackerman and I. I. Smalyukh, Nature Materials16, 426 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Bidasyuk, A

    Y . Bidasyuk, A. Chumachenko, O. Prikhodko, S. Vilchin- skii, M. Weyrauch, and A. Yakimenko, Physical Review A92, 053603 (2015)

    2015

  19. [19]

    Sutcliffe, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 51, 375401 (2018)

    P. Sutcliffe, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 51, 375401 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Sallermann, H

    M. Sallermann, H. J ´onsson, and S. Bl ¨ugel, Physical Review B 107, 104404 (2023). 19

    2023

  21. [21]

    Liu, Phys

    R. Liu, Phys. Rev. B98, 79P (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    A. O. Leonov, Magnetism3, 297 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    K. L. Metlov, Physical Review B111, 174450 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Bogdanov and A

    A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials138, 255 (1994)

    1994

  25. [25]

    J.-S. B. Tai and I. I. Smalyukh, Physical Review Letters121, 187201 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    A. O. Leonov and T. Shigenaga, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22846 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    A. O. Leonov and T. Shigenaga, Physical Review Research8, 023193 (2026)

    2026

  28. [28]

    Nakamura and A

    K. Nakamura and A. Leonov, Physical Review B110, 094403 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    A. O. Leonov, Physical Review B105, 094404 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Leonov, I

    A. Leonov, I. Dragunov, U. R ¨oßler, and A. Bogdanov, Physical Review E90, 042502 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    A. O. Leonov, Physical Review E104, 044701 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Rapini and M

    A. Rapini and M. Papoular, Le Journal de Physique Colloques 30, C4 (1969)

    1969

  33. [33]

    Shiyanovskii, D

    S. Shiyanovskii, D. V oloschenko, T. Ishikawa, and O. Lavren- tovich, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals Science and Technology. Section A. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 358, 225 (2001)

    2001

  34. [34]

    Shiyanovskii, I

    S. Shiyanovskii, I. Smalyukh, and O. Lavrentovich, inDefects in liquid crystals: computer simulations, theory and experi- ments(Springer, 2001) pp. 229–270

    2001

  35. [35]

    J. V . Selinger,Introduction to topological defects and solitons: in liquid crystals, magnets, and related materials(Springer, 2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Mertelj, D

    A. Mertelj, D. Lisjak, M. Drofenik, and M. ˇCopiˇc, Nature504, 237 (2013)

    2013

  37. [37]

    Q. Liu, P. J. Ackerman, T. C. Lubensky, and I. I. Smalyukh, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 10479 (2016)

    2016

  38. [38]

    O. D. Lavrentovich, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 14629 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Cholesteric Fingers from a Magnetic Perspective: Topology, Energetics, and Interactions

    T. Shigenaga and A. O. Leonov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.06660 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia- Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, AIP advances4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Karhu, U

    E. Karhu, U. R ¨oßler, A. Bogdanov, S. Kahwaji, B. Kirby, H. Fritzsche, M. Robertson, C. Majkrzak, and T. Monchesky, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 094429 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    Huang and C

    S. Huang and C. Chien, Physical Review Letters108, 267201 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    Dieny and M

    B. Dieny and M. Chshiev, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 025008 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Johnson, P

    M. Johnson, P. Bloemen, F. Den Broeder, and J. De Vries, Re- ports on Progress in Physics59, 1409 (1996)

    1996

  45. [45]

    Kawaguchi, Y

    Y . Kawaguchi, Y . Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Physical Review B 93, 064416 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    N. A. Porter, C. S. Spencer, R. C. Temple, C. J. Kinane, T. R. Charlton, S. Langridge, and C. H. Marrows, Phys. Rev. B92, 144402 (2015)

    2015

  47. [47]

    Leonov, G

    A. Leonov, G. G ¨odecke, J. Grefe, S. S ¨ullow, and D. Menzel, Physical Review Research8, 013130 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Muhlbauer, B

    S. Muhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. Boni, Science323, 915 (2009)

    2009

  49. [49]

    Crisanti, A

    M. Crisanti, A. Leonov, R. Cubitt, A. Labh, H. Wilhelm, M. P. Schmidt, and C. Pappas, Physical Review Research5, 033033 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Dozov, EPL (Europhysics Letters)56, 247 (2001)

    I. Dozov, EPL (Europhysics Letters)56, 247 (2001)

    2001

  51. [51]

    Borshch, Y .-K

    V . Borshch, Y .-K. Kim, J. Xiang, M. Gao, A. J´akli, V . P. Panov, J. K. Vij, C. T. Imrie, M.-G. Tamba, G. H. Mehl,et al., Nature communications4, 2635 (2013)

    2013

  52. [52]

    D. Chen, J. H. Porada, J. B. Hooper, A. Klittnick, Y . Shen, M. R. Tuchband, E. Korblova, D. Bedrov, D. M. Walba, M. A. Glaser, et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 15931 (2013)

    2013

  53. [53]

    R. B. Meyer, Applied Physics Letters14, 208 (1969)

    1969

  54. [54]

    De Gennes, Solid State Communications6, 163 (1968)

    P. De Gennes, Solid State Communications6, 163 (1968)

    1968

  55. [55]

    Xiang, S

    J. Xiang, S. V . Shiyanovskii, C. Imrie, and O. D. Lavrentovich, Physical Review Letters112, 217801 (2014)

    2014

  56. [56]

    O. S. Iadlovska, G. R. Maxwell, G. Babakhanova, G. H. Mehl, C. Welch, S. V . Shiyanovskii, and O. D. Lavrentovich, Optics Letters43, 1850 (2018)

    2018

  57. [57]

    Karcz, J

    J. Karcz, J. Herman, N. Rychłowicz, P. Kula, E. G ´orecka, J. Szydlowska, P. W. Majewski, and D. Pociecha, Science384, 1096 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Bogdanov and A

    A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials195, 182 (1999)

    1999

  59. [59]

    Oswald, J

    P. Oswald, J. Baudry, and S. Pirkl, Physics Reports337, 67 (2000)

    2000

  60. [60]

    Baudry, S

    J. Baudry, S. Pirkl, and P. Oswald, Physical Review E59, 5562 (1999)

    1999

  61. [61]

    I. I. Smalyukh, B. Senyuk, P. Palffy-Muhoray, O. Lavrentovich, H. Huang, E. Gartland Jr, V . Bodnar, T. Kosa, and B. Taheri, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics72, 061707 (2005)

    2005

  62. [62]

    R. B. Meyer, inLes Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, 1973: Molecular Fluids, edited by R. Balian and G. Weil (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1976)

    1973

  63. [63]

    De Gennes, J

    P.-G. De Gennes, J. Prost,et al., International series of mono- graphs on physics83, 2 (1995)

    1995

  64. [64]

    Press and A

    M. Press and A. Arrott, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 37, 81 (1976)

    1976

  65. [65]

    Gil and J

    L. Gil and J. Gilli, Physical Review Letters80, 5742 (1998)

    1998

  66. [66]

    Ribi `ere, S

    P. Ribi `ere, S. Pirkl, and P. Oswald, Liquid Crystals16, 203 (1994)

    1994

  67. [67]

    Togawa, T

    Y . Togawa, T. Koyama, K. Takayanagi, S. Mori, Y . Kousaka, J. Akimitsu, S. Nishihara, K. Inoue, A. Ovchinnikov, and J.-i. Kishine, Physical Review Letters108, 107202 (2012)

    2012

  68. [68]

    S.-Z. Lin, A. Saxena, and C. D. Batista, Physical review B91, 224407 (2015)

    2015

  69. [69]

    Ohara, X

    K. Ohara, X. Zhang, Y . Chen, S. Kato, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, Z. Hou, Y . Zhou, G. Zhao,et al., Nano Letters22, 8559 (2022)

    2022

  70. [70]

    Leonov, T

    A. Leonov, T. Monchesky, J. Loudon, and A. Bogdanov, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter28, 35LT01 (2016)

    2016

  71. [71]

    Loudon, A

    J. Loudon, A. Leonov, A. Bogdanov, M. C. Hatnean, and G. Balakrishnan, Physical Review B97, 134403 (2018)

    2018

  72. [72]

    Capic, D

    D. Capic, D. A. Garanin, and E. M. Chudnovsky, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 415803 (2020)

    2020