pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04318 · v2 · pith:EPJ2EEIYnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

The Awada-Gibbons-Shaw Algebra in de Sitter Space and SUSY Breaking

T. Banks This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords Awada-Gibbons-Shaw algebrade Sitter spacesupersymmetry breakinggravitino masscosmological supersymmetry breakinglocal supersymmetry algebra
0
0 comments X

The pith

A deformation of the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw algebra rederives the cosmological supersymmetry breaking relation in de Sitter space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the relation m_{3/2} = C / sqrt(R_dS L_P) follows from deforming the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw local supersymmetry algebra in de Sitter space. This matters because it ties the scale of supersymmetry breaking to the size of the universe and the Planck scale through algebraic consistency alone. The approach treats the positive cosmological constant as requiring a modification to the standard supersymmetry algebra. A reader would see this as a way to derive the gravitino mass from geometry without introducing separate breaking mechanisms.

Core claim

By introducing a specific deformation to the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw local supersymmetry algebra suitable for de Sitter space, the Cosmological Supersymmetry Breaking Relation m_{3/2} = C / sqrt(R_dS L_P) is rederived.

What carries the argument

A deformation of the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw local supersymmetry algebra that incorporates the effects of the de Sitter geometry.

If this is right

  • The gravitino mass is fixed by the de Sitter radius and the Planck length.
  • This provides an algebraic origin for cosmological supersymmetry breaking.
  • The relation holds without additional inputs beyond the deformed algebra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This deformation might be applicable to other curved space supersymmetry algebras.
  • Future work could explore if this algebra leads to specific predictions for particle spectra in cosmology.
  • One could check consistency with quantum gravity approaches that also modify supersymmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen deformation of the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw algebra must be consistent and sufficient to generate the exact mass relation purely from the algebra.

What would settle it

An explicit check showing that the deformed algebra does not close properly or requires extra terms to match m_{3/2} = C / sqrt(R_dS L_P) would disprove the rederivation.

read the original abstract

We rederive the Cosmological Supersymmetry Breaking Relation $m_{3/2} = \frac{C}{\sqrt{R_{dS} L_P}}$ from a deformation of the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw local supersymmetry algebra.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to rederive the Cosmological Supersymmetry Breaking Relation m_{3/2} = C / sqrt(R_dS L_P) from a deformation of the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw local supersymmetry algebra in de Sitter space.

Significance. If the deformation were shown to close consistently and to yield the stated mass relation without external parameter tuning, the result would supply an algebraic route to cosmological SUSY breaking. The manuscript supplies no such demonstration, so its potential significance cannot be evaluated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the relation contains an undetermined constant C whose origin is not specified; without the explicit deformation or its closure conditions it is impossible to determine whether C arises from the algebra or is inserted by hand to match the target formula.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no derivation steps, intermediate commutators, or consistency checks in de Sitter space are provided, so the central claim that the deformed algebra produces the mass relation cannot be verified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the report and the opportunity to clarify our manuscript. We respond point by point to the major comments and indicate the changes we will make to the abstract.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the relation contains an undetermined constant C whose origin is not specified; without the explicit deformation or its closure conditions it is impossible to determine whether C arises from the algebra or is inserted by hand to match the target formula.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract does not indicate the origin of C. In the manuscript the constant is fixed by imposing consistent closure of the deformed Awada-Gibbons-Shaw algebra on de Sitter space. We will revise the abstract to state explicitly that C is determined by the algebra closure conditions rather than inserted by hand. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no derivation steps, intermediate commutators, or consistency checks in de Sitter space are provided, so the central claim that the deformed algebra produces the mass relation cannot be verified.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary. The explicit deformation, the relevant commutators, and the closure conditions that produce the mass relation are derived in the body of the paper. We will add one sentence to the abstract that references these steps and the de Sitter consistency checks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The abstract states that the Cosmological Supersymmetry Breaking Relation is rederived from a deformation of the Awada-Gibbons-Shaw algebra, but supplies no equations, deformation ansatz, or derivation steps. Per hard rules, circularity requires explicit quotes exhibiting reduction by construction or self-citation load-bearing; none are present. The undetermined constant C is noted but does not trigger a finding without paper text showing it is fitted or smuggled in. The derivation is treated as self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; the ledger is therefore minimal and provisional.

free parameters (1)
  • C
    Undetermined constant appearing in the rederived relation; its value or origin is not specified in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Awada-Gibbons-Shaw algebra admits a deformation in de Sitter space that produces the stated mass relation.
    Invoked directly in the abstract as the starting point for the rederivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5549 in / 1368 out tokens · 69929 ms · 2026-06-28T05:40:13.064102+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Black hole horizon as a quantum surface,

    G. ’t Hooft, “The Black hole horizon as a quantum surface,” Phys. Scripta T36, 247-252 (1991) doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1991/T36/026; C. R. Stephens, G. ’t Hooft and B. F. Whiting, “Black hole evaporation without informa- tion loss,” Class. Quant. Grav.11, 621-648 (1994) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/3/014 [arXiv:gr- qc/9310006 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1991/t36/026 1991

  2. [2]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram,” J. Math. Phys.36, 6377-6396 (1995) doi:10.1063/1.531249 [arXiv:hep-th/9409089 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.531249 1995

  3. [3]

    Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State

    T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260-1263 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260 [arXiv:gr-qc/9504004 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1260 1995

  4. [4]

    CONFORMAL SUPERGRAV- ITY, TWISTORS AND THE SUPER BMS GROUP,

    M. A. Awada, G. W. Gibbons and W. T. Shaw, “CONFORMAL SUPERGRAV- ITY, TWISTORS AND THE SUPER BMS GROUP,” Annals Phys.171, 52 (1986) doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(86)80023-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(86)80023-9 1986

  5. [5]

    On the Unitarity of the Gravitational S-Matrix in High Dimension,

    T. Banks,“On the Unitarity of the Gravitational S-Matrix in High Dimension,” [arXiv:2602.14971 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    The Super BMS Algebra, Scattering and Holography

    T. Banks, “The Super BMS Algebra, Scattering and Holography,” [arXiv:1403.3420 [hep- th]]; T. Banks,“Current Algebra on the Conformal Boundary and the Variables of Quantum Gravity,” [arXiv:1511.01147 [hep-th]]; T. Banks, “The Temperature/Entropy Connection for 6 Horizons, Massless Particle Scattering, and the Origin of Locality,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, n...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271815440101 2015

  7. [7]

    R. Haag, R. V. Kadison, and D. Kastler Nets of C?-Algebras and Classification of States, Communications in Mathematical Physics 16 (1970) 81104; D. W. Robinson Normal and Lo- cally Normal States, Communications in Mathematical Physics 19 (1970) 219234; D. Kastler, D. Robinson, and J. E. Swieca Conserved Currents and Associated Symmetries; Goldstones Theor...

    1970

  8. [8]

    Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,

    R. Sachs,“Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,” Phys. Rev.128, 2851-2864 (1962) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2851; H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269, 21-52 (1962) doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0161

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.128.2851 1962

  9. [9]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D15, 2738-2751 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2738 1977

  10. [10]

    Black Hole Entropy from Conformal Field Theory in Any Dimension

    S. Carlip, “Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2828-2831 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2828 [arXiv:hep-th/9812013 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2828 1999

  11. [11]

    Conformal description of horizon's states

    S. N. Solodukhin, “Conformal description of horizon’s states,” Phys. Lett. B454, 213-222 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00398-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9812056 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00398-6 1999

  12. [12]

    Aspects of capacity of entanglement

    J. De Boer, J. J¨ arvel¨ a and E. Keski-Vakkuri, “Aspects of capacity of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.6, 066012 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.066012 [arXiv:1807.07357 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.066012 2019

  13. [13]

    Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,

    E. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,” JHEP04, 209 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)209 [arXiv:1911.02018 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2020)209 2020

  14. [14]

    Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,

    T. Banks and K. M. Zurek, “Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.12, 126026 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.126026 [arXiv:2108.04806 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.126026 2021

  15. [15]

    Generalized entanglement capacity of de Sitter space,

    T. Banks and P. Draper, “Generalized entanglement capacity of de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.4, 045025 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.045025 [arXiv:2404.13684 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.045025 2024

  16. [16]

    Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity,

    T. Banks, “Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity,” [arXiv:2502.04924 [hep-th]]; T. Banks, “TASI Lectures on Holographic Space-Time, SUSY and Gravitational Effective Field Theory,” [arXiv:1007.4001 [hep-th]]; T. Banks, W. Fis- chler and L. Mannelli,“Microscopic quantum mechanics of the p = rho universe,” Phys. Rev...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.123514 2005

  17. [17]

    Fuzzy Geometry via the Spinor Bundle, with Applications to Holographic Space-time and Matrix Theory

    T. Banks and J. Kehayias, “Fuzzy Geometry via the Spinor Bundle, with Applica- tions to Holographic Space-time and Matrix Theory,” Phys. Rev. D84, 086008 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.086008 [arXiv:1106.1179 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.086008 2011

  18. [18]

    Cosmological SUSY Breaking and the Pyramid Schemes

    T. Banks,“Cosmological SUSY Breaking and the Pyramid Scheme,” Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.22, 411-433 (2015) doi:10.1142/9789814602686 0014; T. Banks, “Cos- mological SUSY breaking and the pyramid scheme,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A30, no.12, 7 1530009 (2015) doi:10.1142/S0217732315300098 [arXiv:1402.0891 [hep-ph]]; T. Banks and J. F. Fortin, “A Pyramid Sc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789814602686 2015

  19. [19]

    Cosmological Breaking of Supersymmetry?

    W. Fischler,Taking de Sitter Seriously, Talk given at the Festschrift for G. West, Taos, NM, 2000, T. Banks, Talk at the Lennyfest, Stanford University, June 2000, published in T. Banks, “Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16, 910-921 (2001) doi:10.1142/S0217751X01003998 [arXiv:hep-th/0007146 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x01003998 2000

  20. [20]

    An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,” JHEP02, 082 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)082 [arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2023)082 2023

  21. [21]

    Effective Field Theory, Black Holes, and the Cosmological Constant

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, “Effective field theory, black holes, and the cos- mological constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4971-4974 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4971 [arXiv:hep-th/9803132 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4971 1999

  22. [22]

    Recurrent Nightmares?: Measurement Theory in de Sitter Space

    T. Banks, W. Fischler and S. Paban, “Recurrent nightmares? Measurement theory in de Sitter space,” JHEP12, 062 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/062 [arXiv:hep-th/0210160 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/062 2002

  23. [23]

    What does it mean to have a quantum gravitational theory of de Sitter Space?,

    T. Banks, “What does it mean to have a quantum gravitational theory of de Sitter Space?,” [arXiv:2605.13490 [hep-th]]. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv