pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04914 · v1 · pith:BN3TUZCXnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.supr-con· physics.app-ph· quant-ph

Tunable Resonator Integrated Magnetometry

Colin Stack , Brian Sears , Aruna Ramanayaka , David Ferguson , Ilya Sochnikov , Tony X. Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 04:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-conphysics.app-phquant-ph
keywords superconducting magnetometrytunable resonatorflux sensingmillikelvin temperaturequantum non-demolitionSQUIDLC circuitmesoscopic sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A flux-tunable superconducting resonator merges LC-circuit readout speed with SQUID flux sensitivity to enable magnetometry at millikelvin temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a new superconducting sensor called the tunable resonator, or tRes, fabricated in a foundry process. It is built to deliver the fast response of a simple inductor-capacitor circuit together with the magnetic-flux sensitivity of a SQUID while remaining low-loss and compatible with quantum non-demolition readout. The authors demonstrate operation at millikelvin temperatures with MHz-rate magnetic sampling and show two distinct measurement modes plus three circuit variants of increasing complexity. If the device works as described, it supplies a practical magnetometer for investigating mesoscopic targets in the same cryogenic environment used for quantum processors and sensors.

Core claim

The authors designed and fabricated a superconducting flux-tunable resonator that combines the speed of an inductor-capacitor circuit with the flux sensitivity of a SQUID, yielding a magnetometer that operates at millikelvin temperatures with low loss and quantum non-demolition characteristics. They introduce its basic functionality at MHz magnetic sampling rates, demonstrate two measurement modalities, and test three circuits of gradually increasing complexity to extract target-specific information. The resulting combination of sensitivity and readout speed makes the tRes an attractive and versatile magnetometer.

What carries the argument

The flux-tunable resonator (tRes), a superconducting circuit whose resonance frequency shifts with applied magnetic flux, thereby converting flux changes into measurable frequency shifts at high speed.

If this is right

  • Magnetic sampling becomes possible at MHz rates while retaining SQUID-level flux sensitivity.
  • Quantum non-demolition readout allows repeated measurements on the same target without disturbing its state.
  • Three circuit variants of increasing complexity extract progressively more target-specific information from the same sensor platform.
  • The sensor operates inside the same millikelvin environment used for superconducting qubits and other quantum devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration of the tRes directly onto quantum-processor chips could allow on-chip calibration or real-time field monitoring without additional wiring.
  • The same flux-to-frequency transduction principle might be adapted to sense other weak signals that couple to magnetic flux, such as currents in nearby circuits.
  • Comparison of tRes performance against conventional SQUID magnetometers on identical targets would quantify any practical speed or noise advantage.

Load-bearing premise

The fabricated tRes devices actually deliver the claimed combination of low loss, quantum non-demolition readout, and MHz-rate flux sensitivity without unaccounted decoherence or fabrication-induced degradation at millikelvin temperatures.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing that the resonator's flux-to-frequency conversion or energy decay rate at millikelvin temperatures falls short of the combined LC-plus-SQUID performance would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

The quantum-technology revolution is reshaping computing, sensing, and communication. In magnetometry, recent advances leverage precise control of spin qubits and color centers in solid-state crystals for mesoscopic-scale sensing. Yet at very low temperatures, superconducting sensing technology remains unrivaled because of its non-invasiveness and higher sensitivity. Here we describe a class of superconducting sensors that offers low loss and quantum non-demolition measurement characteristics. We designed and fabricated a superconducting flux-tunable resonator (tRes) in a superconducting chip foundry and matured it to a level that combines the speed of an inductor-capacitor circuit with the flux sensitivity of a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) to perform magnetometry at milli-kelvin temperature to investigate targets. We introduce its fundamental functionality readily at MHz magnetic sampling rate, showcase two measurement modalities, and investigate three circuits with gradually increasing complexity to extract target-specific information. The combination of high sensitivity and fast readout characteristics make tRes an attractive and versatile magnetometer.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a class of superconducting sensors based on a flux-tunable resonator (tRes) fabricated in a chip foundry. It claims the device combines the readout speed of an LC circuit with SQUID-like flux sensitivity, enabling magnetometry at milli-kelvin temperatures with MHz-rate sampling, low loss, quantum non-demolition readout, two measurement modalities, and analysis of three circuits of increasing complexity to extract target-specific information.

Significance. A working tRes with the claimed combination of speed, sensitivity, and QND properties would be a useful addition to the toolkit for mesoscopic superconducting sensing. However, the manuscript supplies no quantitative performance metrics, error bars, or measurement results against which these claims can be evaluated, so the potential significance cannot be determined from the provided text.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the central claim that the fabricated tRes devices deliver low loss, QND readout, and MHz-rate flux sensitivity at millikelvin temperatures without unaccounted decoherence is unsupported by any data, circuit diagrams, or quantitative metrics. This directly undermines evaluation of the stated combination of LC speed and SQUID sensitivity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review of our manuscript. Below we respond point-by-point to the major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the central claim that the fabricated tRes devices deliver low loss, QND readout, and MHz-rate flux sensitivity at millikelvin temperatures without unaccounted decoherence is unsupported by any data, circuit diagrams, or quantitative metrics. This directly undermines evaluation of the stated combination of LC speed and SQUID sensitivity.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract states performance characteristics of the fabricated devices without accompanying experimental data or error bars. The manuscript body presents the design of the flux-tunable resonator together with circuit analysis of three configurations of increasing complexity; circuit diagrams appear in the figures. However, no measured performance metrics, loss data, or sampling-rate results are reported. The claims in the abstract therefore rest on design expectations rather than measured results. We will revise the abstract to distinguish design goals from demonstrated performance and will add an explicit statement that the work introduces the concept and supporting analysis rather than experimental characterization. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of any experimental measurement results or quantitative performance metrics (with error bars) in the manuscript

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental device paper centered on fabrication and measurement of a flux-tunable resonator (tRes) for magnetometry. No derivation chain, first-principles calculation, or fitted-parameter prediction appears in the provided abstract or described structure; the central claims rest on physical realization, QND readout, and MHz-rate flux sensitivity demonstrated at millikelvin temperatures. No self-definitional equations, self-citation load-bearing premises, or renaming of known results are present. The argument is therefore self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no equations, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be enumerated beyond the device name itself.

invented entities (1)
  • tRes (flux-tunable resonator) no independent evidence
    purpose: magnetometry at mK temperatures
    Presented as a new class of superconducting sensors; no independent falsifiable prediction supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5727 in / 1174 out tokens · 30829 ms · 2026-06-28T04:47:21.668887+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Northrop Grumman Mission Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA

  2. [2]

    Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA

  3. [3]

    Institute of Material Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA

  4. [4]

    Abstract The quantum -technology revolution is reshaping computing, sensing, and communication

    Department of Material Science & Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA †Corresponding author. Abstract The quantum -technology revolution is reshaping computing, sensing, and communication. In magnetometry, recent advances leverage precise control of spin qubits and color centers in solid - state crystals for mesoscopic-sc...

  5. [5]

    oscilloscope

    using a 13-metal-layer stack to ensure quality control, minimal crosstalk, consistent signal to noise (SNR) per measurement , a large operating parameter window, and a compact device footprint. The designed tRes (Fig. 2d) is comprised of a quarter-wave transmission line section that is capacitively coupled to a feedline on one end, and the other end galva...

  6. [6]

    Fast, Lifetime -Preserving Readout for High -Coherence Qua ntum Annealers,

    J. A. Grover et al. , “Fast, Lifetime -Preserving Readout for High -Coherence Qua ntum Annealers,” PRX Quantum , vol. 1, no. 2, p. 020314, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020314

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020314 2020

  7. [7]

    Calibration of Flux Crosstalk in Large-Scale Flux-Tunable Superconducting Quantum Circuits,

    X. Dai et al., “Calibration of Flux Crosstalk in Large-Scale Flux-Tunable Superconducting Quantum Circuits,” PRX Quantum , vol. 2, no. 4, p. 040313, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040313

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040313 2021

  8. [8]

    Magnetometry with nitrogen -vacancy defects in diamond,

    L. Rondin, J. -P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, J. -F. Roch, P. Maletinsky, and V. Jacques, “Magnetometry with nitrogen -vacancy defects in diamond,” Rep. Prog. Phys. , vol. 77, no. 5, p. 056503, 2014, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056503

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056503 2014

  9. [9]

    Studying Quantum Materials with Scanning SQUID Microscopy,

    E. Persky, I. Sochnikov, and B. Kalisky, “Studying Quantum Materials with Scanning SQUID Microscopy,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 385–405, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620-104226

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620-104226 2022

  10. [10]

    Clarke and A

    J. Clarke and A. I. Braginski, The SQUID Handbook: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems, 1 edition. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2004

    2004

  11. [11]

    NanoSQUIDs: Basics & recent advances,

    José Martínez-Pérez Maria and Koelle Dieter, “NanoSQUIDs: Basics & recent advances,” Phys. Sci. Rev., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1–27, 2017, doi: 10.1515/psr-2017-5001

    work page doi:10.1515/psr-2017-5001 2017

  12. [12]

    Direct Measurement of Current -Phase Relations in Superconductor/Topological Insulator/Superconductor Junctions,

    I. Sochnikov et al. , “Direct Measurement of Current -Phase Relations in Superconductor/Topological Insulator/Superconductor Junctions,” Nano Lett., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3086–3092, July 2013, doi: 10.1021/nl400997k

    work page doi:10.1021/nl400997k 2013

  13. [13]

    Nonsinusoidal Current -Phase Relationship in Josephson Junctions from the 3D Topological Insulator HgTe,

    I. Sochnikov et al. , “Nonsinusoidal Current -Phase Relationship in Josephson Junctions from the 3D Topological Insulator HgTe,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 114, no. 6, p. 066801, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.066801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.066801 2015

  14. [14]

    Imaging and tuning polarity at SrTiO3 domain walls,

    Y. Frenkel et al., “Imaging and tuning polarity at SrTiO3 domain walls,” Nat. Mat, vol. 16, p. 1203, Sept. 2017

    2017

  15. [15]

    Strain-tunable magnetism at oxide domain walls,

    D. V. Christensen et al., “Strain-tunable magnetism at oxide domain walls,” Nat. Phys., Dec. 2018

    2018

  16. [16]

    Sputtered Mo 66Re34 SQUID-on-Tip for High -Field Magnetic and Thermal Nanoimaging,

    K. Bagani et al. , “Sputtered Mo 66Re34 SQUID-on-Tip for High -Field Magnetic and Thermal Nanoimaging,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 12, no. 4, p. 044062, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.044062

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.044062 2019

  17. [17]

    Gate-tuned superfluid density at the superconducting LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface,

    J. A. Bert et al., “Gate-tuned superfluid density at the superconducting LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface,” Phys Rev B, vol. 86, no. 6, p. 060503, Aug. 2012

    2012

  18. [18]

    A micro - SQUID with dispersive readout for magnetic scanning microscopy,

    F. Foroughi, J.-M. Mol, T. Müller, J. R. Kirtley, K. A. Moler, and H. Bluhm, “A micro - SQUID with dispersive readout for magnetic scanning microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 112, no. 25, p. 252601, June 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5030489

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5030489 2018

  19. [19]

    Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spatial resolution,

    J. R. Kirtley et al., “Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spatial resolution,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 87, no. 9, p. 093702, 2016, doi: 10.1063/1.4961982

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4961982 2016

  20. [20]

    Experimental Demonstration of an Oscillator Stabilized Josephson Flux Qubit,

    R. H. Koch et al., “Experimental Demonstration of an Oscillator Stabilized Josephson Flux Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 96, no. 12, p. 127001, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.127001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.127001 2006

  21. [21]

    Parametric Control of a Superconducting Flux Qubit,

    S. Saito, T. Meno, M. Ueda, H. Tanaka, K. Semba, and H. Takayanagi, “Parametric Control of a Superconducting Flux Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 96, no. 10, p. 107001, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.107001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.107001 2006

  22. [22]

    Deep- well ultrafast manipulation of a SQUID flux qubit,

    M. G. Castellano, F. Chiarello, P. Carelli, C. Cosmelli, F. Mattioli, and G. Torrioli, “Deep- well ultrafast manipulation of a SQUID flux qubit,” New J. Phys., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 043047, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/4/043047

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/4/043047 2010

  23. [23]

    Working Point Adjustable DC -SQUID for the Readout of Gap Tunable Flux Qubit,

    H. Deng et al., “Working Point Adjustable DC -SQUID for the Readout of Gap Tunable Flux Qubit,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1 –4, June 2015, doi: 10.1109/TASC.2015.2399272

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2015.2399272 2015

  24. [24]

    Z -Gate Operation on a Superconducting Flux Qubit via its Readout SQUID,

    X. Y. Jin et al. , “Z -Gate Operation on a Superconducting Flux Qubit via its Readout SQUID,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 3, no. 3, p. 034004, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.034004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.3.034004 2015

  25. [25]

    Realizing a Circuit Analog of an Optomechanical System with Longitudinally Coupled Superconducting Resonators,

    C. Eichler and J. R. Petta, “Realizing a Circuit Analog of an Optomechanical System with Longitudinally Coupled Superconducting Resonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 120, no. 22, p. 227702, May 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.227702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.227702 2018

  26. [26]

    Digital Coherent Control of a Superconducting Qubit,

    E. Leonard et al., “Digital Coherent Control of a Superconducting Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 014009, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.014009 2019

  27. [27]

    Ideal Quantum Nondemolition Readout of a Flux Qubit without Purcell Limitations,

    X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, “Ideal Quantum Nondemolition Readout of a Flux Qubit without Purcell Limitations,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 12, no. 6, p. 064037, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064037

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.064037 2019

  28. [28]

    Design, optimization, and construction of a dc SQUID with complete flux transformer circuits,

    J. Knuutila, M. Kajola, H. Seppä, R. Mutikainen, and J. Salmi, “Design, optimization, and construction of a dc SQUID with complete flux transformer circuits,” J. Low Temp. Phys., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 369–392, June 1988, doi: 10.1007/BF00116869

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00116869 1988

  29. [29]

    Design, fabrication, and performance of integrated miniature SQUID susceptometers,

    M. B. Ketchen et al., “Design, fabrication, and performance of integrated miniature SQUID susceptometers,” IEEE Trans. Magn. , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1212 –1215, Mar. 1989, doi: 10.1109/20.92513

    work page doi:10.1109/20.92513 1989

  30. [30]

    Weinstock, Ed., SQUID Sensors: Fundamentals, Fabrication and Applications

    H. Weinstock, Ed., SQUID Sensors: Fundamentals, Fabrication and Applications. in Nato Science Series E: Springer Netherlands, 1996

    1996

  31. [31]

    SQUID systems for biomagnetic imaging,

    Vittorio Pizzella, Stefania Della Penna, Cosimo Del Gratta, and Gian Luca Romani, “SQUID systems for biomagnetic imaging,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 14, no. 7, p. R79, July 2001, doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/14/7/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-2048/14/7/201 2001

  32. [32]

    A Multiloop SQUID and a SQUID Array With 1-μm and Submicrometer Input Coils,

    M. Kiviranta, L. Gronberg, and J. Hassel, “A Multiloop SQUID and a SQUID Array With 1-μm and Submicrometer Input Coils,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1600105– 1600105, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1109/TASC.2012.2190286

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2012.2190286 2012

  33. [33]

    Self-Aligned Nanoscale SQUID on a Tip,

    A. Finkler et al., “Self-Aligned Nanoscale SQUID on a Tip,” Nano Lett, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1046–1049, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1021/nl100009r

    work page doi:10.1021/nl100009r 2010

  34. [34]

    The response of small SQUID pickup loops to magnetic fields,

    J. R. Kirtley et al. , “The response of small SQUID pickup loops to magnetic fields,” Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 29, no. 12, p. 124001, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1088/0953 - 2048/29/12/124001

    work page doi:10.1088/0953 2016

  35. [35]

    SQUID-on-tip with single-electron spin sensitivity for high -field and ultra-low temperature nanomagnetic imaging,

    Y. Anahory et al., “SQUID-on-tip with single-electron spin sensitivity for high -field and ultra-low temperature nanomagnetic imaging,” Nanoscale, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 3174 –3182, 2020, doi: 10.1039/C9NR08578E

    work page doi:10.1039/c9nr08578e 2020

  36. [36]

    dc SQUID Design with Femtotesla Sensitivity for Quantum -Ready Readouts,

    I. Sochnikov, D. Davino, and B. Kalisky, “dc SQUID Design with Femtotesla Sensitivity for Quantum -Ready Readouts,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 14, no. 1, p. 014020, July 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.014020 2020

  37. [37]

    High-Tc and low-Tc dc SQUID electronics,

    Dietmar Drung, “High-Tc and low-Tc dc SQUID electronics,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 16, no. 12, p. 1320, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/16/12/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-2048/16/12/002 2003

  38. [38]

    Hot electron effect in the DC SQUID,

    F. C. Wellstood, C. Urbina, and J. Clarke, “Hot electron effect in the DC SQUID,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1001–1004, Mar. 1989, doi: 10.1109/20.92457

    work page doi:10.1109/20.92457 1989

  39. [39]

    DC SQUID series array amplifiers with 120 MHz bandwidth,

    M. E. Huber et al., “DC SQUID series array amplifiers with 120 MHz bandwidth,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1251–1256, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1109/77.919577

    work page doi:10.1109/77.919577 2001

  40. [40]

    Quantum state detection of a superconducting flux qubit using a dc -SQUID in the inductive mode,

    A. Lupaşcu, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, “Quantum state detection of a superconducting flux qubit using a dc -SQUID in the inductive mode,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 71, no. 18, p. 184506, May 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.184506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.184506 2005

  41. [41]

    Weinstock and M

    H. Weinstock and M. Nisenoff, Microwave Superconductivity, vol. 375. in NATO Science Series, no. E, vol. 375. Millau, France, 1999

    1999

  42. [42]

    Decoherence in Josephson Qubits from Dielectric Loss,

    J. M. Martinis et al., “Decoherence in Josephson Qubits from Dielectric Loss,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, no. 21, p. 210503, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.210503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210503 2005

  43. [43]

    Tunable superconducting microwave resonator for quantum transduction,

    H. K. Warner et al. , “Tunable superconducting microwave resonator for quantum transduction,” EPJ Web Conf., vol. 335, p. 06012, 2025, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202533506012

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202533506012 2025

  44. [44]

    Selective coupling of superconducting charge qubits mediated by a tunable stripline cavity,

    M. Wallquist, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, “Selective coupling of superconducting charge qubits mediated by a tunable stripline cavity,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 74, no. 22, p. 224506, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.224506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.224506 2006

  45. [45]

    Josephson -junction-embedded transmission-line resonators: From Kerr medium to in -line transmon,

    J. Bourassa, F. Beaudoin, J. M. Gambetta, and A. Blais, “Josephson -junction-embedded transmission-line resonators: From Kerr medium to in -line transmon,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 86, no. 1, p. 013814, July 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.013814

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.013814 2012

  46. [46]

    Investigation of nonlinear effects in Josephson parametric oscillators used in circuit quantum electrodynamics,

    P. Krantz et al., “Investigation of nonlinear effects in Josephson parametric oscillators used in circuit quantum electrodynamics,” New J. Phys. , vol. 15, no. 10, p. 105002, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/10/105002

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/10/105002 2013

  47. [47]

    Parametric resonance in tunable superconducting cavities,

    W. Wustmann and V. Shumeiko, “Parametric resonance in tunable superconducting cavities,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, no. 18, p. 184501, May 2013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.184501 2013

  48. [48]

    Nonlinearity and parametric driving in a SQUID -tunable microchip resonator,

    Y. P. Reshitnyk, “Nonlinearity and parametric driving in a SQUID -tunable microchip resonator,” 2014

    2014

  49. [49]

    Advancements In Superconducting Electronics Design and Manufacturing at NGSC,

    Z. Keane, “Advancements In Superconducting Electronics Design and Manufacturing at NGSC,” presented at the 1st International Workshop on Quantum, Cryogenic and Superconductive Computing (QUEST2024), Kyushu University in Fukuoka, Japan: IEEE Council on Superconductivity (CSC), Sept. 2024. Accessed: July 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ieeecsc.org/po...

    2024

  50. [50]

    Superconducting on -chip solenoid for Josephson junction characterization,

    A. L. Graninger et al. , “Superconducting on -chip solenoid for Josephson junction characterization,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 115, no. 3, p. 032601, July 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5110170

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5110170 2019

  51. [51]

    Critical Current Modulation in Josephson Junctions Contacted by Redundant Vias,

    A. L. Graninger et al., “Critical Current Modulation in Josephson Junctions Contacted by Redundant Vias,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. , vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1 –5, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3128626

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2021.3128626 2022

  52. [52]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,” Appl. Phys. Rev., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 021318, June 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5089550

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5089550 2019

  53. [53]

    A magnon scattering platform,

    T. X. Zhou et al., “A magnon scattering platform,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 118, no. 25, June 2021, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019473118

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2019473118 2021

  54. [54]

    Consensus statement on Brillouin light scattering microscopy of biological materials,

    P. Bouvet et al. , “Consensus statement on Brillouin light scattering microscopy of biological materials,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 681–691, July 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41566- 025-01681-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566- 2025

  55. [55]

    Magnetostatic twists in room -temperature skyrmions explored by nitrogen-vacancy center spin texture reconstruction,

    Y. Dovzhenko et al., “Magnetostatic twists in room -temperature skyrmions explored by nitrogen-vacancy center spin texture reconstruction,” Nat. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2712, July 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05158-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05158-9 2018

  56. [56]

    Magnetic-field-dependent photodynamics of single NV defects in diamond: an application to qualitative all -optical magnetic imaging,

    J.-P. Tetienne et al., “Magnetic-field-dependent photodynamics of single NV defects in diamond: an application to qualitative all -optical magnetic imaging,” New J. Phys. , vol. 14, no. 10, p. 103033, 2012, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103033

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103033 2012

  57. [57]

    Vortex Dynamics and Dissipation under High - Amplitude Microwave Drive,

    M. Checchin and A. Grassellino, “Vortex Dynamics and Dissipation under High - Amplitude Microwave Drive,” Phys Rev Appl , vol. 14, no. 4, p. 044018, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.044018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.044018 2020

  58. [58]

    Microwave microscope studies of trapped vortex dynamics in superconductors,

    C.-Y. Wang and S. M. Anlage, “Microwave microscope studies of trapped vortex dynamics in superconductors,” Phys Rev B, vol. 111, no. 21, p. 214524, June 2025, doi: 10.1103/x1d1-2k68

    work page doi:10.1103/x1d1-2k68 2025

  59. [59]

    Scanning SQUID characterization of extremely overdoped La2-xSrxCuO4,

    C. Herrera, J. Franklin, I. Božović, X. He, and I. Sochnikov, “Scanning SQUID characterization of extremely overdoped La2-xSrxCuO4,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, no. 2, p. 024528, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.024528

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.024528 2021

  60. [60]

    Probing Non-Equilibrium Pair-Breaking and Quasiparticle Dynamics in Nb Superconducting Resonators Under Magnetic Fields,

    J.-M. Park et al., “Probing Non-Equilibrium Pair-Breaking and Quasiparticle Dynamics in Nb Superconducting Resonators Under Magnetic Fields,” Materials, vol. 18, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ma18030569

    work page doi:10.3390/ma18030569 2025

  61. [61]

    Nonlinear Properties of Supercurrent-Carrying Single- and Multi-Layer Thin-Film Superconductors,

    S. Zhao, S. Withington, D. J. Goldie, and C. N. Thomas, “Nonlinear Properties of Supercurrent-Carrying Single- and Multi-Layer Thin-Film Superconductors,” J. Low Temp. Phys., vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 34–44, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10909-019-02306-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10909-019-02306-3 2020

  62. [62]

    Domain wall dynamics in two -dimensional van der Waals ferromagnets,

    D. Abdul -Wahab et al. , “Domain wall dynamics in two -dimensional van der Waals ferromagnets,” Appl. Phys. Rev., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 041411, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0062541

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0062541 2021

  63. [63]

    Mechanism of Slow Relaxation due to Screening Effect in a Frustrated System,

    S. Tanaka and S. Miyashita, “Mechanism of Slow Relaxation due to Screening Effect in a Frustrated System,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , vol. 78, no. 8, p. 084002, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.78.084002

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.78.084002 2009

  64. [64]

    Two -level systems in superconducting quantum devices due to trapped quasiparticles,

    S. E. de Graaf et al. , “Two -level systems in superconducting quantum devices due to trapped quasiparticles,” Sci. Adv., vol. 6, no. 51, p. eabc5055, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc5055. Fig. 1. A tunable resonator operating as a magnetometer to sense flux from targets emitting magnetic fields into their surrounding space. Graphic credit: Matthew Savoury. Fig. 2...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc5055