pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09324 · v1 · pith:LIWSK5CEnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Space- and time-like electromagnetic form factors of the Ω baryon

L. Albino , B. Almeida-Zamora , A. Bashir , J.J. Cobos-Mart\'inez , K. Raya , J. Segovia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-exnucl-th
keywords electromagnetic form factorsOmega baryonDyson-Schwinger equationsrainbow-ladder truncationcontact interactionanomalous magnetic momenttime-like form factorsFaddeev equation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The electromagnetic form factors of the Ω baryon show visible sensitivity to the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment in the magnetic and higher multipole sectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the elastic electromagnetic form factors of the Ω baryon, composed of three strange quarks, in both space-like and time-like regions. It employs a confining, symmetry-preserving framework based on the rainbow-ladder truncation of the Dyson-Schwinger equations and a Poincaré-covariant Faddeev equation for the three-quark bound state. The electromagnetic current is constructed to obey the Ward-Takahashi identity, producing four independent form factors for the electric monopole, magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, and magnetic octupole moments. The calculations reveal that the static moments and multipole form factors depend noticeably on the value of the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment, with the strongest effects appearing in the magnetic and higher-order sectors. Time-like form factors are obtained by asymptotic analytic continuation of the space-like results for comparison with data.

Core claim

Within a confining, symmetry-preserving framework based on a vector⊗vector contact interaction and the rainbow-ladder truncation of QCD's Dyson-Schwinger equations, combined with a Poincaré-covariant Faddeev equation for the three-quark bound state, the elastic electromagnetic form factors of the Ω baryon are computed in both space-like and time-like regions. The Ω baryon, composed solely of strange quarks, provides a clean environment for studying quark mass and SU(3)-flavor symmetry effects. The electromagnetic current is constructed consistently with the Ward-Takahashi identity, yielding four independent form factors associated with the electric monopole, magnetic dipole, electric quadrup

What carries the argument

The rainbow-ladder truncation of the Dyson-Schwinger equations with a vector⊗vector contact interaction, used to solve the Poincaré-covariant Faddeev equation for the three-strange-quark bound state and to construct an electromagnetic current that satisfies the Ward-Takahashi identity.

If this is right

  • The static electromagnetic moments of the Ω baryon vary with the chosen value of the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment.
  • The magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, and magnetic octupole form factors display stronger sensitivity to this anomalous moment than the electric monopole form factor.
  • Analytic continuation from space-like to time-like kinematics produces effective form factors that can be compared directly with available experimental data.
  • The equal strange-quark masses make the Ω a clean probe of SU(3)-flavor symmetry in baryon structure within the model.
  • The same framework supplies consistent predictions for both kinematic regions without additional parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying the anomalous magnetic moment parameter within this truncation could be used to explore consistency with data on other strange baryons such as the Lambda or Sigma.
  • The reported sensitivity implies that non-perturbative calculations of decuplet baryons should treat quark anomalous moments as an explicit degree of freedom rather than deriving them solely from the wave function.
  • Predictions in the time-like region could be confronted with future measurements at electron-positron facilities or in hyperon photoproduction.
  • Applying the identical truncation and current construction to the Delta baryon would allow a direct test of how flavor symmetry breaking affects the same multipole sensitivities.

Load-bearing premise

The rainbow-ladder truncation of the Dyson-Schwinger equations combined with the vector⊗vector contact interaction provides a sufficiently accurate and symmetry-preserving description of the non-perturbative dynamics for the three-strange-quark bound state.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation or precise measurement of the Ω magnetic dipole moment or magnetic octupole form factor that remains unchanged when the input value of the dressed strange-quark anomalous magnetic moment is varied would falsify the reported sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09324 by A. Bashir, B. Almeida-Zamora, J.J. Cobos-Mart\'inez, J. Segovia, K. Raya, L. Albino.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Poincar´e-covariant Faddeev equation. Ψ is the Fad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Quark–photon dressing functions appearing in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Axial-vector diquark-photon dressing functions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Space-like electromagnetic form factors of the Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Space-like electromagnetic form factors of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time-like electromagnetic form factors of the Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Effective form factor of the Ω baryon in the time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present predictions for the elastic electromagnetic form factors of the $\Omega$ baryon in both space-like and time-like regions, computed within a confining, symmetry-preserving framework based on a vector$\,\otimes\,$vector contact interaction. The calculation is performed in the rainbow-ladder truncation of QCD's Dyson-Schwinger equations, combined with a Poincar\'e-covariant Faddeev equation for the three-quark bound state. The $\Omega$ baryon, composed solely of strange quarks, provides a particularly clean environment in which to investigate the role of quark mass and SU(3)-flavor symmetry in shaping baryon structure. Within this approach, the electromagnetic current is constructed consistently with the Ward-Takahashi identity, yielding four independent form factors associated with the electric monopole, magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, and magnetic octupole moments. We compute these form factors over a broad kinematic domain and analyze their behavior in both space-like and time-like regions. The resulting static electromagnetic moments and multipole form factors of the $\Omega$ baryon exhibit a visible sensitivity to the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment, particularly in the magnetic and higher-order multipole sectors. The time-like form factors are obtained through asymptotic analytic continuation of the corresponding space-like solutions, allowing the construction of the effective form factor and its comparison with available experimental data and recent phenomenological analyses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents predictions for the elastic electromagnetic form factors of the Ω baryon in both space-like and time-like regions using a rainbow-ladder truncation of the Dyson-Schwinger equations with a vector⊗vector contact interaction and a Poincaré-covariant Faddeev equation. The electromagnetic current is constructed to satisfy the Ward-Takahashi identity, producing four independent form factors (electric monopole, magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, magnetic octupole). The central result is that the static moments and multipole form factors exhibit visible sensitivity to the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment, especially in the magnetic and higher-order sectors. Time-like form factors are obtained via asymptotic analytic continuation and compared to experimental data.

Significance. If the sensitivity result holds under further scrutiny, the work supplies model predictions for the electromagnetic structure of a three-strange-quark baryon and extends the contact-interaction framework to the time-like domain. The symmetry-preserving construction and explicit Ward-Takahashi identity compliance are clear strengths of the approach. The calculation adds to the body of Dyson-Schwinger studies of baryon form factors by isolating the role of the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment in an SU(3)-flavor symmetric system.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the static moments and multipole form factors 'exhibit a visible sensitivity' to the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment is presented without numerical error estimates, without explicit variation of the two free parameters (contact interaction strength and strange quark mass), and without a demonstration that the sensitivity survives changes in those parameters. This omission directly affects the load-bearing assertion of the paper.
  2. [Framework description] Framework description (paragraph describing the framework): the rainbow-ladder truncation with a momentum-independent vector⊗vector contact interaction is taken to furnish a sufficiently accurate description of the three-strange-quark bound state. No test is reported showing that the reported sensitivity in the magnetic dipole, quadrupole, and octupole sectors remains when the kernel is replaced by a momentum-dependent interaction that could damp or redistribute the higher multipole currents.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript should state explicitly how the analytic continuation to the time-like region is performed and what checks (e.g., consistency with unitarity or dispersion relations) are applied to the continued solutions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the static moments and multipole form factors 'exhibit a visible sensitivity' to the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment is presented without numerical error estimates, without explicit variation of the two free parameters (contact interaction strength and strange quark mass), and without a demonstration that the sensitivity survives changes in those parameters. This omission directly affects the load-bearing assertion of the paper.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract statement would be strengthened by quantitative support. The sensitivity is shown in the body via explicit comparison of results obtained with and without the anomalous magnetic moment term in the quark-photon vertex. The two model parameters are fixed by the requirement that the computed Ω mass and other static properties match known values, but we will revise the abstract to quote the percentage changes in the moments and add a short paragraph in the results section illustrating the effect of modest variations around the fitted parameter values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Framework description] Framework description (paragraph describing the framework): the rainbow-ladder truncation with a momentum-independent vector⊗vector contact interaction is taken to furnish a sufficiently accurate description of the three-strange-quark bound state. No test is reported showing that the reported sensitivity in the magnetic dipole, quadrupole, and octupole sectors remains when the kernel is replaced by a momentum-dependent interaction that could damp or redistribute the higher multipole currents.

    Authors: The contact interaction is adopted precisely because it yields a symmetry-preserving, Poincaré-covariant framework in which the Ward-Takahashi identity can be satisfied exactly and the analytic continuation to the time-like region can be performed. While a momentum-dependent kernel would constitute a more realistic truncation, the present study is confined to the contact-interaction model in order to isolate the effect of the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment. A systematic comparison with momentum-dependent kernels lies outside the scope of this work. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper computes Ω baryon form factors via rainbow-ladder DSEs with a fixed vector⊗vector contact interaction, constructs the current to satisfy the WTI, and obtains time-like values by analytic continuation of space-like solutions. The reported sensitivity to the dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moment is obtained by explicit variation of that model parameter inside an otherwise fixed kernel; this is a direct numerical exploration rather than a reduction of the output to the input by definition. No equation is shown to equal another by algebraic identity, no fitted subset is relabeled as a prediction of a closely related observable, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported solely via self-citation. The framework is applied to a new system (three-strange-quark bound state) with stated assumptions that do not presuppose the target multipole results, satisfying the criteria for an independent calculation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard DSE truncations and a contact interaction whose parameters are fitted to reproduce other observables; no new entities postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • contact interaction strength
    Coupling constant in the vector⊗vector interaction, typically adjusted to match meson masses or decay constants in this class of models.
  • strange quark mass parameter
    Current or dressed strange quark mass chosen to reproduce known strange meson or baryon properties.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Rainbow-ladder truncation of the quark-gluon vertex is adequate for baryon bound-state calculations
    Invoked in the description of the Dyson-Schwinger and Faddeev setup.
  • domain assumption Vector⊗vector contact interaction preserves Poincaré covariance and chiral symmetry
    Stated as the basis for the symmetry-preserving framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5813 in / 1326 out tokens · 22996 ms · 2026-06-27T16:09:46.333413+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 48 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The diagramD 1: quark-photon coupling The first contribution corresponds to the photon cou- pling directly to a dressed strange quark inside the Ω baryon. The associated kernel reads ΛD1 µ,αβ (k;P f , Pi) =e s Dαδ(Pf)S(−k −f) ×Λ γq µ S(−k−i) ∆1+ δλ (−k)D λβ(Pi), (22) �� (� �) η ����(� �) 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 �� [����] �� �� FIG. 3. Quark–pho...

  2. [2]

    The diagramD 2: elastic diquark-photon coupling The second contribution corresponds to the elastic photon scattering from the axial-vector diquark inside the Ω baryon. The associated kernel is ΛD2 µ,αβ (k;P f , Pi) =e {ss} Dαδ(Pf)S(k) ∆ 1+ δρ (kf) ×Λ γdq µ,ρσ ∆1+ σλ(ki)D λβ(Pi),(28) where the structure of the corresponding diquark-photon vertex, Λγdq µ,ρσ...

  3. [3]

    Posdoctorados por M´ exico

    and N(1520) 3 2 − [59]. We note that, although the parameterηoriginates from the quark–photon interaction [83], its impact may differ between quark- and diquark-level contributions. In this work, we consider the same value of the dressed- quark anomalous magnetic moment parameter in both the quark-photon and diquark-photon vertices. The re- sultingη-depen...

    2005

  4. [4]

    Abdul Khaleket al., Science Requirements and De- tector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl

    R. Abdul Khaleket al., Science Requirements and De- tector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022), arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Accardiet al., Strong interaction physics at the lumi- nosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur

    A. Accardiet al., Strong interaction physics at the lumi- nosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur. Phys. J. A60, 173 (2024), arXiv:2306.09360 [nucl- ex]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Aiet al., Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator, Nucl

    X.-C. Aiet al., Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator, Nucl. Sci. Tech.36, 242 (2025), arXiv:2509.11522 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    C. F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Nu- cleon Electromagnetic Form Factors, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.59, 694 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Pacetti, R

    S. Pacetti, R. Baldini Ferroli, and E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Proton electromagnetic form factors: Basic notions, present achievements and future perspectives, Phys. Rept.550-551, 1 (2015)

    2015

  9. [9]

    Punjabi, C

    V. Punjabi, C. F. Perdrisat, M. K. Jones, E. J. Brash, and C. E. Carlson, The Structure of the Nucleon: Elastic Electromagnetic Form Factors, Eur. Phys. J. A51, 79 (2015), arXiv:1503.01452 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    J. J. Kelly, Simple parametrization of nucleon form fac- tors, Phys. Rev. C70, 068202 (2004)

    2004

  11. [11]

    Arrington, W

    J. Arrington, W. Melnitchouk, and J. A. Tjon, Global analysis of proton elastic form factor data with two- photon exchange corrections, Phys. Rev. C76, 035205 (2007), arXiv:0707.1861 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  12. [12]

    Z. Ye, J. Arrington, R. J. Hill, and G. Lee, Proton and Neutron Electromagnetic Form Factors and Uncertain- ties, Phys. Lett. B777, 8 (2018), arXiv:1707.09063 [nucl- ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Tiator, D

    L. Tiator, D. Drechsel, S. S. Kamalov, and M. Van- derhaeghen, Electromagnetic Excitation of Nucleon Resonances, Eur. Phys. J. ST198, 141 (2011), arXiv:1109.6745 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Ronchen, M

    D. Ronchen, M. Doring, F. Huang, H. Haberzettl, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, S. Krewald, U. G. Meissner, and K. Nakayama, Coupled-channel dynamics in the re- actions piN –>piN, etaN, KLambda, KSigma, Eur. Phys. J. A49, 44 (2013), arXiv:1211.6998 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    I. G. Aznauryanet al., Studies of Nucleon Resonance Structure in Exclusive Meson Electroproduction, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E22, 1330015 (2013), arXiv:1212.4891 [nucl- th]

    arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    Kamano, S

    H. Kamano, S. X. Nakamura, T. S. H. Lee, and T. Sato, Nucleon resonances within a dynamical coupled-channels model ofπNandγNreactions, Phys. Rev. C88, 035209 (2013), arXiv:1305.4351 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    Achenbachet al., The present and future of QCD, Nucl

    P. Achenbachet al., The present and future of QCD, Nucl. Phys. A1047, 122874 (2024), arXiv:2303.02579 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Ramalho and M

    G. Ramalho and M. T. Pe˜ na, Electromagnetic transi- tion form factors of baryon resonances, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.136, 104097 (2024), arXiv:2306.13900 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Capstick and N

    S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D34, 2809 (1986)

    1986

  21. [21]

    Hyodo and M

    T. Hyodo and M. Niiyama, QCD and the strange baryon spectrum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.120, 103868 (2021), arXiv:2010.07592 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Eichmann, H

    G. Eichmann, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, R. Williams, R. Alkofer, and C. S. Fischer, Baryons as relativis- tic three-quark bound states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 1 (2016), arXiv:1606.09602 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    S.-x. Qin, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Spectrum of light- and heavy-baryons, Few Body Syst.60, 26 (2019), arXiv:1902.00026 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Ramalho, Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω − baryon in the spacelike and timelike regions, Phys

    G. Ramalho, Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω − baryon in the spacelike and timelike regions, Phys. Rev. D103, 074018 (2021), arXiv:2012.11710 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Boinepalli, D

    S. Boinepalli, D. B. Leinweber, P. J. Moran, A. G. Williams, J. M. Zanotti, and J. B. Zhang, Precision elec- tromagnetic structure of decuplet baryons in the chiral regime, Phys. Rev. D80, 054505 (2009), arXiv:0902.4046 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    Alexandrou, T

    C. Alexandrou, T. Korzec, G. Koutsou, J. W. Negele, and Y. Proestos, The Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω− in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D82, 034504 (2010), arXiv:1006.0558 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Sanchis-Alepuz, R

    H. Sanchis-Alepuz, R. Williams, and R. Alkofer, Delta and Omega electromagnetic form factors in a three-body covariant Bethe-Salpeter approach, Phys. Rev. D87, 096015 (2013), arXiv:1302.6048 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Fu, J.-J

    D. Fu, J.-J. Xie, and Y. Dong, Electromagnetic form factors of Ω- with the meson cloud in the spacelike and timelike regions, Phys. Rev. D112, 036016 (2025), arXiv:2505.03363 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.33, 477 (1994), arXiv:hep- ph/9403224

    arXiv 1994

  30. [30]

    Alkofer and L

    R. Alkofer and L. von Smekal, The Infrared behavior of QCD Green’s functions: Confinement dynamical symme- try breaking, and hadrons as relativistic bound states, Phys. Rept.353, 281 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0007355

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    Maris and C

    P. Maris and C. D. Roberts, Dyson-Schwinger equations: A Tool for hadron physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E12, 297 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0301049

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  32. [32]

    I. C. Cloet and C. D. Roberts, Explanation and Predic- tion of Observables using Continuum Strong QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.77, 1 (2014), arXiv:1310.2651 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Eichmann, R

    G. Eichmann, R. Alkofer, I. C. Cloet, A. Krassnigg, and C. D. Roberts, Perspective on rainbow-ladder truncation, Phys. Rev. C77, 042202 (2008), arXiv:0802.1948 [nucl- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Binosi, L

    D. Binosi, L. Chang, J. Papavassiliou, S.-X. Qin, and C. D. Roberts, Symmetry preserving truncations of the gap and Bethe-Salpeter equations, Phys. Rev. D93, 096010 (2016), arXiv:1601.05441 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Qin, S.-x

    P. Qin, S.-x. Qin, and Y.-x. Liu, Heavy-light mesons beyond the ladder approximation, Phys. Rev. D101, 12 114014 (2020), arXiv:1912.05902 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Eichmann, I

    G. Eichmann, I. C. Cloet, R. Alkofer, A. Krassnigg, and C. D. Roberts, Toward unifying the description of meson and baryon properties, Phys. Rev. C79, 012202 (2009), arXiv:0810.1222 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    S.-x. Qin, L. Chang, Y.-x. Liu, C. D. Roberts, and D. J. Wilson, Investigation of rainbow-ladder truncation for excited and exotic mesons, Phys. Rev. C85, 035202 (2012), arXiv:1109.3459 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    Chang, I

    L. Chang, I. C. Clo¨ et, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, and P. C. Tandy, Pion electromagnetic form factor at spacelike momenta, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 141802 (2013), arXiv:1307.0026 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    S.-S. Xu, C. Chen, I. C. Cloet, C. D. Roberts, J. Segovia, and H.-S. Zong, Contact-interaction Faddeev equation and, inter alia , proton tensor charges, Phys. Rev. D92, 114034 (2015), arXiv:1509.03311 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    K. Raya, L. Chang, A. Bashir, J. J. Cobos-Martinez, L. X. Guti´ errez-Guerrero, C. D. Roberts, and P. C. Tandy, Structure of the neutral pion and its electromag- netic transition form factor, Phys. Rev. D93, 074017 (2016), arXiv:1510.02799 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Y. Lu, C. Chen, C. D. Roberts, J. Segovia, S.-S. Xu, and H.-S. Zong, Parity partners in the baryon resonance spec- trum, Phys. Rev. C96, 015208 (2017), arXiv:1705.03988 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    C. Chen, Y. Lu, D. Binosi, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodr´ ıguez- Quintero, and J. Segovia, Nucleon-to-Roper electromag- netic transition form factors at largeQ 2, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034013 (2019), arXiv:1811.08440 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Y. Lu, C. Chen, Z.-F. Cui, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, J. Segovia, and H. S. Zong, Transition form factors: γ∗ +p→∆(1232), ∆(1600), Phys. Rev. D100, 034001 (2019), arXiv:1904.03205 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Z.-F. Cui, C. Chen, D. Binosi, F. de Soto, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodr´ ıguez-Quintero, S. M. Schmidt, and J. Segovia, Nucleon elastic form factors at accessible large spacelike momenta, Phys. Rev. D102, 014043 (2020), arXiv:2003.11655 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    C. Chen, C. S. Fischer, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Form Factors of the Nucleon Axial Current, Phys. Lett. B815, 136150 (2021), arXiv:2011.14026 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Qin and C

    S.-x. Qin and C. D. Roberts, Impressions of the Contin- uum Bound State Problem in QCD, Chin. Phys. Lett. 37, 121201 (2020), arXiv:2008.07629 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    C. Chen, C. S. Fischer, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Nucleon axial-vector and pseudoscalar form factors and PCAC relations, Phys. Rev. D105, 094022 (2022), arXiv:2103.02054 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    C. Chen, B. El-Bennich, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, J. Segovia, and S. Wan, Structure of the nucleon’s low-lying excitations, Phys. Rev. D97, 034016 (2018), arXiv:1711.03142 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    C. Chen, G. I. Krein, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, and J. Segovia, Spectrum and structure of octet and decuplet baryons and their positive-parity excitations, Phys. Rev. D100, 054009 (2019), arXiv:1901.04305 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    M. Y. Barabanovet al., Diquark correlations in hadron physics: Origin, impact and evidence, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.116, 103835 (2021), arXiv:2008.07630 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    L. Liu, C. Chen, Y. Lu, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Composition of low-lying J=32±∆-baryons, Phys. Rev. D105, 114047 (2022), arXiv:2203.12083 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    L. Liu, C. Chen, and C. D. Roberts, Wave functions of (I,JP)=(12,32∓) baryons, Phys. Rev. D107, 014002 (2023), arXiv:2208.12353 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    H. L. L. Roberts, A. Bashir, L. X. Gutierrez-Guerrero, C. D. Roberts, and D. J. Wilson, pi- and rho-mesons, and their diquark partners, from a contact interaction, Phys. Rev. C83, 065206 (2011), arXiv:1102.4376 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  54. [54]

    C. Chen, L. Chang, C. D. Roberts, S. Wan, and D. J. Wilson, Spectrum of hadrons with strangeness, Few Body Syst.53, 293 (2012), arXiv:1204.2553 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Segovia, C

    J. Segovia, C. Chen, C. D. Roberts, and S. Wan, Insights into the gamma* N ->Delta transition, Phys. Rev. C 88, 032201 (2013), arXiv:1305.0292 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    P.-L. Yin, C. Chen, G. Krein, C. D. Roberts, J. Segovia, and S.-S. Xu, Masses of ground-state mesons and baryons, including those with heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D100, 034008 (2019), arXiv:1903.00160 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Yin, Z.-F

    P.-L. Yin, Z.-F. Cui, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Masses of positive- and negative-parity hadron ground- states, including those with heavy quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 327 (2021), arXiv:2102.12568 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    D. J. Wilson, I. C. Cloet, L. Chang, and C. D. Roberts, Nucleon and Roper electromagnetic elastic and tran- sition form factors, Phys. Rev. C85, 025205 (2012), arXiv:1112.2212 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [59]

    Segovia, I

    J. Segovia, I. C. Cloet, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Nucleon and ∆ elastic and transition form factors, Few Body Syst.55, 1185 (2014), arXiv:1408.2919 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    K. Raya, L. X. Guti´ errez-Guerrero, A. Bashir, L. Chang, Z.-F. Cui, Y. Lu, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 266 (2021), arXiv:2108.02306 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Albino, G

    L. Albino, G. Paredes-Torres, K. Raya, A. Bashir, and J. Segovia, Insights into theγ (∗) +N(940) 1 2 + → ∆(1700) 3 2 − transition, Phys. Rev. D112, 054025 (2025), arXiv:2502.06206 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Albino, G

    L. Albino, G. Paredes-Torres, K. Raya, A. Bashir, and J. Segovia,γ(*)+N(940)12+→N(1520)32- helicity am- plitudes and transition form factors, Phys. Rev. D112, 074015 (2025), arXiv:2504.01770 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    J. C. Ward, An Identity in Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev.78, 182 (1950)

    1950

  64. [64]

    Takahashi, On the generalized Ward identity, Nuovo Cim.6, 371 (1957)

    Y. Takahashi, On the generalized Ward identity, Nuovo Cim.6, 371 (1957)

    1957

  65. [65]

    J. S. Ball and T.-W. Chiu, Analytic Properties of the Vertex Function in Gauge Theories. 1., Phys. Rev. D22, 2542 (1980)

    1980

  66. [66]

    Nozawa and D

    S. Nozawa and D. B. Leinweber, Electromagnetic form- factors of spin 3/2 baryons, Phys. Rev. D42, 3567 (1990)

    1990

  67. [67]

    Maris and P

    P. Maris and P. C. Tandy, The Quark photon vertex and the pion charge radius, Phys. Rev. C61, 045202 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/9910033

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  68. [68]

    Eichmann, Nucleon electromagnetic form factors from the covariant Faddeev equation, Phys

    G. Eichmann, Nucleon electromagnetic form factors from the covariant Faddeev equation, Phys. Rev. D84, 014014 (2011), arXiv:1104.4505 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    Segovia, B

    J. Segovia, B. El-Bennich, E. Rojas, I. C. Cloet, C. D. Roberts, S.-S. Xu, and H.-S. Zong, Completing the pic- ture of the Roper resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 171801 (2015), arXiv:1504.04386 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    P. O. Bowman, U. M. Heller, D. B. Leinweber, M. B. Parappilly, and A. G. Williams, Unquenched gluon prop- agator in Landau gauge, Phys. Rev. D70, 034509 (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0402032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  71. [71]

    I. L. Bogolubsky, E. M. Ilgenfritz, M. Muller-Preussker, and A. Sternbeck, Lattice gluodynamics computation of 13 Landau gauge Green’s functions in the deep infrared, Phys. Lett. B676, 69 (2009), arXiv:0901.0736 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  72. [72]

    A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi, and J. Papavassiliou, Gluon and ghost propagators in the Landau gauge: Deriving lattice results from Schwinger-Dyson equations, Phys. Rev. D 78, 025010 (2008), arXiv:0802.1870 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  73. [73]

    Binosi, C

    D. Binosi, C. Mezrag, J. Papavassiliou, C. D. Roberts, and J. Rodriguez-Quintero, Process-independent strong running coupling, Phys. Rev. D96, 054026 (2017), arXiv:1612.04835 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    Cui, J.-L

    Z.-F. Cui, J.-L. Zhang, D. Binosi, F. de Soto, C. Mezrag, J. Papavassiliou, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodr´ ıguez-Quintero, J. Segovia, and S. Zafeiropoulos, Effective charge from lattice QCD, Chin. Phys. C44, 083102 (2020), arXiv:1912.08232 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Ebert, T

    D. Ebert, T. Feldmann, and H. Reinhardt, Extended NJL model for light and heavy mesons without q - anti-q thresholds, Phys. Lett. B388, 154 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9608223

    arXiv 1996

  76. [76]

    Krein, C

    G. Krein, C. D. Roberts, and A. G. Williams, On the implications of confinement, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7, 5607 (1992)

    1992

  77. [77]

    Chang, C

    L. Chang, C. D. Roberts, and P. C. Tandy, Selected high- lights from the study of mesons, Chin. J. Phys.49, 955 (2011), arXiv:1107.4003 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  78. [78]

    C. D. Roberts, Strong QCD and Dyson-Schwinger Equa- tions, IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.21, 355 (2015), arXiv:1203.5341 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    L. X. Gutierrez-Guerrero, A. Bashir, I. C. Cloet, and C. D. Roberts, Pion form factor from a contact interac- tion, Phys. Rev. C81, 065202 (2010), arXiv:1002.1968 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [80]

    H. L. L. Roberts, L. Chang, I. C. Cloet, and C. D. Roberts, Masses of ground and excited-state hadrons, Few Body Syst.51, 1 (2011), arXiv:1101.4244 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

Showing first 80 references.