pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17380 · v1 · pith:3QOJCIX2new · submitted 2026-06-16 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Universal structure in the interactions of massless fields on the lightcone

Jin Kozaki , Yasha Neiman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords cubic verticeslightcone formalismmassless fieldshigher spinself-dual theorieschiral gravity(A)dS spacetimelinearized curvatures
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cubic vertices for massless fields of arbitrary spin are all direct generalizations of products of linearized curvatures in the lightcone formalism.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a universal structure for cubic interactions among massless fields of any spin in four dimensions, using the lightcone approach. It supplies explicit expressions that work uniformly in flat spacetime and in (anti-)de Sitter backgrounds. The same expressions immediately show that self-dual and chiral theories, including self-dual Yang-Mills and chiral higher-spin gravity, remain consistent when restricted to cubic order alone. The expressions start non-local but admit a local rewriting. The flat-to-curved connection follows directly from the conformal properties of the linearized curvatures.

Core claim

All cubic vertices in the lightcone formalism can be expressed as a direct generalization of the abelian vertices formed by multiplying linearized curvatures; this supplies simple explicit expressions for every such vertex and proves that the various self-dual and chiral theories are fully consistent with no vertices required beyond cubic order, with the flat versus (A)dS relation following from the conformal invariance of those curvatures.

What carries the argument

Direct generalization of abelian vertices obtained by multiplying linearized curvatures, which supplies the explicit form for all cubic interactions and the consistency proofs.

If this is right

  • Explicit expressions exist for every cubic vertex of massless fields of arbitrary spin.
  • Self-dual Yang-Mills, self-dual general relativity, and chiral higher-spin gravity are consistent using only cubic vertices.
  • The same vertex expressions apply equally in flat spacetime and in (A)dS backgrounds.
  • Non-local vertex expressions admit an equivalent local rewriting.
  • The flat-to-(A)dS map is immediate once the vertices are written in curvature form.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The curvature-based form may simplify the search for consistent higher-order vertices or for scattering amplitudes in these theories.
  • The structure could be tested by comparing against known cubic vertices in the literature for specific spins.
  • It raises the question whether similar curvature products organize quartic or higher interactions.
  • The conformal invariance link suggests possible extensions to other conformally flat backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

Every cubic vertex that can appear in the lightcone formalism is captured by generalizing the abelian vertices built from linearized curvatures.

What would settle it

An explicit cubic interaction in lightcone gauge for some massless fields that cannot be rewritten as a generalization involving products of linearized curvatures.

read the original abstract

We consider cubic interactions of massless fields of arbitrary spin in 4 spacetime dimensions, within the lightcone formalism. We extend two key results from flat to (Anti-)de Sitter spacetime. First, we present a simple explicit expression for all the cubic vertices. Second, we prove that the various self-dual/chiral theories, such as Self-Dual Yang-Mills, Self-Dual General Relativity and Chiral Higher-Spin Gravity, are fully consistent with no need for vertices beyond cubic. The key observation behind our results is that all cubic vertices in the lightcone formalism can be expressed as a direct generalization of the "abelian" vertices formed by multiplying linearized curvatures. The simple relationship between flat and (Anti-)de Sitter then follows essentially from the conformal invariance of such linearized curvatures. The price for such simplicity is that our vertex expressions are non-local. It is however easy to bring them into a local form, which we also present.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to provide a simple explicit expression for all cubic vertices of massless fields of arbitrary spin in 4D lightcone gauge, extending flat-space results to (A)dS, and to prove that self-dual/chiral theories (Self-Dual Yang-Mills, Self-Dual GR, Chiral Higher-Spin Gravity) are consistent with no vertices beyond cubic order. Both results rest on the observation that every cubic vertex is a direct generalization of abelian vertices obtained by multiplying linearized curvatures, whose conformal invariance supplies the flat-to-(A)dS map; the expressions are initially non-local but can be localized.

Significance. If the completeness of the curvature-product construction holds, the work supplies a universal parametrization of cubic interactions and a clean consistency proof for chiral higher-spin theories, with the conformal-invariance argument providing a parameter-free flat-(A)dS relation. Explicit formulas and the localization procedure are concrete strengths that would be useful for further calculations in the lightcone formalism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'all cubic vertices in the lightcone formalism can be expressed as a direct generalization of the abelian vertices formed by multiplying linearized curvatures' is stated as the key observation, yet no completeness argument, enumeration of possible lightcone structures, or proof that non-curvature-product vertices are absent is supplied; without this, both the 'all vertices' formula and the subsequent no-higher-vertex proofs for self-dual theories cover only a subclass.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts an explicit formula and a proof of consistency, but the provided text supplies neither derivation steps for the generalized vertices nor explicit verification against known cases (e.g., spin-1 or spin-2 cubic vertices), leaving the soundness of the load-bearing claims unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. The conversion from the non-local expressions to local form is described as 'easy' but would benefit from an explicit worked example for at least one spin combination.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and will make the necessary revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'all cubic vertices in the lightcone formalism can be expressed as a direct generalization of the abelian vertices formed by multiplying linearized curvatures' is stated as the key observation, yet no completeness argument, enumeration of possible lightcone structures, or proof that non-curvature-product vertices are absent is supplied; without this, both the 'all vertices' formula and the subsequent no-higher-vertex proofs for self-dual theories cover only a subclass.

    Authors: The manuscript derives the general form of the cubic vertices by generalizing the abelian curvature products, which are known to generate the interactions in flat space, and extends this via conformal invariance to (A)dS. While we believe this covers all vertices because any cubic interaction in lightcone gauge can be written in terms of the transverse components that match the curvature structures, we acknowledge that an explicit enumeration of all possible lightcone monomials and a proof of completeness is not included. We will add this discussion in a new subsection to justify why no other independent structures exist. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts an explicit formula and a proof of consistency, but the provided text supplies neither derivation steps for the generalized vertices nor explicit verification against known cases (e.g., spin-1 or spin-2 cubic vertices), leaving the soundness of the load-bearing claims unverified.

    Authors: We agree that including explicit derivation steps and verifications would improve the manuscript. The full text does contain the general expression, but we will expand the relevant sections to include step-by-step derivations starting from the linearized curvatures and provide direct comparisons with the standard cubic vertices for spin-1 (self-dual Yang-Mills) and spin-2 (self-dual gravity) cases to verify the formula. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow from stated observation on curvature products without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper presents its explicit vertex expressions and consistency proofs as resting on the key observation that all cubic vertices generalize abelian curvature-multiplication structures, with the flat-to-(A)dS map following from the standard conformal invariance of linearized curvatures. No quoted step shows a parameter fitted to data then renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain that is load-bearing, or an ansatz smuggled without external justification. The derivation chain is self-contained against the stated premise; the completeness of the curvature-product form is asserted as observation rather than derived by redefinition of the target quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that linearized curvatures remain the building blocks for all cubic vertices and that their conformal invariance directly supplies the curved-space vertices; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linearized curvatures are conformally invariant
    Invoked to obtain the flat-to-(A)dS relation from the same vertex expression.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5692 in / 1264 out tokens · 35230 ms · 2026-06-27T00:21:54.229685+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dirichlet, Neumann, Mixed and self-dual holography: (self-dual) Yang--Mills theory II

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Derives bulk and boundary propagators and computes 3- and 4-point correlators for YM, CS and SDYM in AdS/CFT with multiple boundary conditions to relate their observables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hamiltonian

    for vertices constructed out of the derivatives (7). All the results below can be extended to de Sitter following the analytic-continuation procedure of [31]. With this understanding, we will focus on the AdS vertices (8),(10) and their flat limit. 3 We haven’t yet proven that the vertex formula (8) is correct, i.e. that it’s consistent at cubic order for...

  2. [2]

    =c Z d3x V[3] ; (17) J −y

  3. [3]

    =i h K y [2], P − [3] i =K y lin ▷ P −

  4. [4]

    =−i h K y [2], J−y [3] i =−K y lin ▷ J −y

  5. [5]

    (19) Plugging (16)-(17) and our vertex formula (8) into (18)- (19), a straightforward calculation gives (neglecting total derivatives in thed 3xintegrals throughout): J −y

  6. [6]

    =−c Z d3x yV[3] ; (20) K −

  7. [7]

    intrinsic

    = c 2 Z d3x(y 2 +z 2)V[3] = 2c Z d3x ξ¯ξ V[3] .(21) This is in fact the simplest possible result, containing only the “orbital” terms that follow from the Hamilto- nian densitycV [3]. This is an advantage of the specific vertex formula (8): adding total derivatives, e.g. to reach the local form (10), generally adds “intrinsic” correction terms to (20)-(21...

  8. [8]

    = 0.(22) Plugging in (8),(14)-(15),(17),(20), this can indeed be verified by straightforward calculation. IV. CONSISTENCY A T HIGHER ORDERS Let us now prove the higher-order consistency of the chiral theory with just the cubic vertices (3),(8). Again, this requires checking the key commutator [P−, J−y] = 0, this time without stopping at cubic order. The o...

  9. [9]

    exchanged

    ). We denote these contributions as: {h1, h2,−h 5},{h 3, h4, h5} ; {h3, h4, h5},{h 1, h2,−h 5} ; (31) {h3, h1,−h 5},{h 2, h4, h5} ; {h2, h4, h5},{h 3, h1,−h 5} ; (32) {h2, h3,−h 5},{h 1, h4, h5} ; {h1, h4, h5},{h 2, h3,−h 5} , (33) where in each case we list the helicities in the two factors. ±h5 denotes the “exchanged” helicity, i.e. the helicity of the ...

  10. [10]

    Now, when symmetrized over the cyclic permutations of the (1,2,3) labels, (A10) indeed vanishes

    +P 23(15β2β3 + 8β2 1 −12β 3β1)−P 31(3β3β1 −12β 2 1 + 8β2 2 −12β 1β2), (A10) where in some of the terms, we sacrificed manifest symmetry under 1↔2 in favor of a shorter expression. Now, when symmetrized over the cyclic permutations of the (1,2,3) labels, (A10) indeed vanishes. The vanishing of the∼ξ 2 term (which corresponds to the flat limit) is due to th...

  11. [11]

    Consistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Consistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B243, 378-382 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91400-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91400-6 1990

  12. [12]

    Higher spin gauge theories in four- dimensions, three-dimensions, and two-dimensions,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Higher spin gauge theories in four- dimensions, three-dimensions, and two-dimensions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D5, 763 (1996) [hep-th/9611024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  13. [13]

    Higher spin gauge theories: Star product and AdS space,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Higher spin gauge theories: Star product and AdS space,” In *Shifman, M.A. (ed.): The many faces of the superworld* 533-610 [hep-th/9910096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    AdS dual of the crit- ical O(N) vector model,

    I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “AdS dual of the crit- ical O(N) vector model,” Phys. Lett. B550, 213 (2002) [hep-th/0210114]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  15. [15]

    The Higher Spin/Vector Model Duality

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, “The Higher Spin/Vector Model Duality,” J. Phys. A46, 214003 (2013) doi:10.1088/1751- 8113/46/21/214003 [arXiv:1208.4036 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751- 2013

  16. [16]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger, “Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, no. 1, 015009 (2017) doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/34/1/015009 [arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361- 2017

  17. [17]

    Static BPS black hole in 4d higher-spin gauge theory

    V. Didenko and M. Vasiliev, “Static BPS black hole in 4d higher-spin gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B 682, 305-315 (2009) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.11.023 [arXiv:0906.3898 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.11.023 2009

  18. [18]

    Bulk interactions and bound- ary dual of higher-spin-charged particles,

    A. David and Y. Neiman, “Bulk interactions and bound- ary dual of higher-spin-charged particles,” JHEP03, 264 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)264 [arXiv:2009.02893 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)264 2021

  19. [19]

    Higher-spin gravity’s “string

    V. Lysov and Y. Neiman, “Higher-spin gravity’s “string”: new gauge and proof of holographic duality for the linearized Didenko-Vasiliev solution,” JHEP10, 054 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)054 [arXiv:2207.07507 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2022)054 2022

  20. [20]

    String Theory as a Higher Spin Theory

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “String The- ory as a Higher Spin Theory,” JHEP09, 085 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)085 [arXiv:1512.07237 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2016)085 2016

  21. [21]

    ABJ Triality: from Higher Spin Fields to Strings

    C. M. Chang, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma and X. Yin, “ABJ Triality: from Higher Spin Fields to Strings,” J. Phys. A 46, 214009 (2013) doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/21/214009 [arXiv:1207.4485 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/21/214009 2013

  22. [22]

    Cu- bic Interaction Terms for Arbitrary Spin,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson and L. Brink, “Cu- bic Interaction Terms for Arbitrary Spin,” Nucl. Phys. B 227, 31-40 (1983) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90140-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90140-2 1983

  23. [23]

    A Cubic interaction of totally symmetric massless representations of the Lorentz group in arbitrary dimensions,

    E. S. Fradkin and R. R. Metsaev, “A Cubic interaction of totally symmetric massless representations of the Lorentz group in arbitrary dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav.8, L89-L94 (1991) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/4/004

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/4/004 1991

  24. [24]

    Light-cone gauge cubic interaction vertices for massless fields in AdS(4)

    R. R. Metsaev, “Light-cone gauge cubic interaction ver- tices for massless fields in AdS(4),” Nucl. Phys. B 936, 320-351 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.09.021 7 [arXiv:1807.07542 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.09.021 2018

  25. [25]

    Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space

    D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Higher- Spin Theories in Flat Space,” J. Phys. A50, no.9, 095401 (2017) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa56e7 [arXiv:1609.04655 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa56e7 2017

  26. [26]

    Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity

    E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran and M. Tsulaia, “Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, no.3, 031601 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.031601 [arXiv:1805.00048 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.031601 2018

  27. [27]

    Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern- Simons Matter Theories,

    E. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern- Simons Matter Theories,” JHEP06, 058 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)058 [arXiv:1811.12333 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2019)058 2019

  28. [28]

    Minimal model of Chiral Higher Spin Grav- ity,

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov and R. Van Dongen, “Minimal model of Chiral Higher Spin Grav- ity,” JHEP09, 134 (2022) [erratum: JHEP02, 183 (2023)] doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)134 [arXiv:2205.07794 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)134 2022

  29. [29]

    Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons mat- ter theories,

    A. Sharapov and E. Skvortsov, “Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons mat- ter theories,” Nucl. Phys. B985, 115982 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115982 [arXiv:2205.15293 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115982 2022

  30. [30]

    Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality

    D. Ponomarev, “Chiral Higher Spin Theo- ries and Self-Duality,” JHEP12, 141 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2017)141 [arXiv:1710.00270 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2017)141 2017

  31. [31]

    Actions for self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,

    K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov and T. Tran, “Actions for self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,” JHEP08, 076 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)076 [arXiv:2105.12782 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2021)076 2021

  32. [32]

    On classification of (self-dual) higher- spin gravities in flat space,

    M. Serrani, “On classification of (self-dual) higher- spin gravities in flat space,” JHEP08, 032 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2025)032 [arXiv:2505.12839 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)032 2025

  33. [33]

    The Uses of Instantons,

    S. R. Coleman, “The Uses of Instantons,” Subnucl. Ser. 15, 805 (1979) HUTP-78-A004

    1979

  34. [34]

    Gravitational Instantons,

    S. W. Hawking, “Gravitational Instantons,” Phys. Lett. A60, 81 (1977) doi:10.1016/0375-9601(77)90386-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(77)90386-3 1977

  35. [35]

    Selfdual Yang-Mills theory, integrability and multiparton amplitudes,

    W. A. Bardeen, “Selfdual Yang-Mills theory, integrability and multiparton amplitudes,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 123, 1-8 (1996) doi:10.1143/PTPS.123.1

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.123.1 1996

  36. [36]

    The Selfdual sec- tor of QCD amplitudes,

    G. Chalmers and W. Siegel, “The Selfdual sec- tor of QCD amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D54, 7628- 7633 (1996) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.7628 [arXiv:hep- th/9606061 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.7628 1996

  37. [37]

    On amplitudes in self-dual sector of Yang-Mills theory

    A. A. Rosly and K. G. Selivanov, “On amplitudes in selfdual sector of Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Lett. B 399, 135-140 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00268-2 [arXiv:hep-th/9611101 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00268-2 1997

  38. [38]

    Gravity, Twistors and the MHV Formalism

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner, “Gravity, Twistors and the MHV Formalism,” Commun. Math. Phys.294, 827-862 (2010) doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0972-4 [arXiv:0808.3907 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0972-4 2010

  39. [39]

    Light cone form of field dy- namics in Anti-de Sitter space-time and AdS / CFT correspondence,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Light cone form of field dy- namics in Anti-de Sitter space-time and AdS / CFT correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B563, 295-348 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00554-4 [arXiv:hep- th/9906217 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00554-4 1999

  40. [40]

    Massive totally symmetric fields in AdS(d),

    R. R. Metsaev, “Massive totally symmetric fields in AdS(d),” Phys. Lett. B590, 95-104 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.057 [arXiv:hep- th/0312297 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.057 2004

  41. [41]

    Causality of higher- spin interactions on the (A)dS lightcone, with appli- cation to the static patch,

    J. Kozaki, J. Lang and Y. Neiman, “Causality of higher- spin interactions on the (A)dS lightcone, with appli- cation to the static patch,” JHEP05, 128 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)128 [arXiv:2510.22532 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2026)128 2026

  42. [42]

    Self-dual gravity in de Sitter space: Light-cone ansatz and static-patch scat- tering,

    Y. Neiman, “Self-dual gravity in de Sitter space: Light-cone ansatz and static-patch scat- tering,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.2, 024039 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.024039 [arXiv:2303.17866 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.024039 2024

  43. [43]

    Higher-spin self-dual General Relativity: 6d and 4d pictures, covariant vs. lightcone,

    Y. Neiman, “Higher-spin self-dual General Relativity: 6d and 4d pictures, covariant vs. lightcone,” JHEP07, 178 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)178 [arXiv:2404.18589 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)178 2024

  44. [44]

    Theories of the gravity plus gauge type in de Sitter space,

    J. Lang and Y. Neiman, “Theories of the gravity plus gauge type in de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.10, 10 (2025) doi:10.1103/qs9d-cbbt [arXiv:2506.16707 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/qs9d-cbbt 2025

  45. [45]

    S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal sym- metry,

    R. R. Metsaev, “S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal sym- metry,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6, 2411-2421 (1991) doi:10.1142/S0217732391002839

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732391002839 1991

  46. [46]

    Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6, 359-367 (1991) doi:10.1142/S0217732391000348

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732391000348 1991

  47. [47]

    Selfdual N=8 supergravity as closed N=2 (N=4) strings,

    W. Siegel, “Selfdual N=8 supergravity as closed N=2 (N=4) strings,” Phys. Rev. D47, 2504- 2511 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.2504 [arXiv:hep- th/9207043 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.2504 1993

  48. [48]

    Hidden sec- tors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,

    S. Jain, D. K. S and E. Skvortsov, “Hidden sec- tors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.10, 10 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.106017 [arXiv:2405.00773 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.106017 2025

  49. [49]

    Self-dual holography: four-point AdS/CFT correlators in higher-spin gravity,

    E. Skvortsov and R. Van Dongen, “Self-dual holography: four-point AdS/CFT correlators in higher-spin gravity,” [arXiv:2605.30276 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Scattering in the static patch of de Sitter space,

    E. Albrychiewicz and Y. Neiman, “Scattering in the static patch of de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.6, 065014 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.065014 [arXiv:2012.13584 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.065014 2021

  51. [51]

    MHV amplitudes and BCFW recursion for Yang-Mills theory in the de Sitter static patch,

    E. Albrychiewicz, Y. Neiman and M. Tsulaia, “MHV amplitudes and BCFW recursion for Yang-Mills theory in the de Sitter static patch,” JHEP09, 176 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)176 [arXiv:2105.07572 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2021)176 2021