pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18342 · v1 · pith:53EXOZMRnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Compact Core, Extended Reach: A Bipolar kpc-Scale Elongation in a Little Red Dot at z approx 5.5

Zhiyuan Ji , Yang Sun , Mauro Giavalisco , Yongda Zhu , George H. Rieke , Christina C. Williams , Michael V. Maseda , Jianwei Lyu
show 2 more authors
Marcia Rieke Sandro Tacchella
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords little red dotshigh-redshift galaxiesbipolar elongationLyα emissionoutflowionization coneJWST observationsMUSE spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

A little red dot at redshift 5.5 hosts a thin bipolar elongation several kiloparsecs long, aligned with Lyα features and modeled as a low-column-density channel from the central engine.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents MUSE integral-field spectroscopy and JWST emission-line maps of LRD-204851 at z=5.482. It identifies a bipolar structure extending several kpc on either side of the optical core, visible in UV continuum and optical lines including a bright [O III] clump. The double-peaked Lyα profile shows a blueshifted component and tentative N V emission that align with the south-eastern direction of the elongation. Radiative-transfer modeling supports this as a biconical low-column-density cavity within a dense envelope, indicating the structure connects to radiation or gas flow from the central engine.

Core claim

LRD-204851 hosts a remarkably thin, bipolar, elongated structure passing through the optical continuum centroid and extending several kpc on either side, traced by both the UV continuum and the rest-frame optical emission lines, with a bright [O III] clump-like structure ~2 kpc to the south-east. The MUSE observations reveal a double-peaked Lyα profile, with a broad and bright near-systemic red peak and a relatively faint peak blueshifted by ~430 km s^{-1}, accompanied by a tentative N V λ1238 detection at similar velocity. Both the blue Lyα peak and the tentative N V emission lean toward this same south-eastern direction. Independently, radiative-transfer modeling of the integrated Lyα prof

What carries the argument

The biconical low-column-density cavity in a dense, slowly expanding neutral envelope, which channels radiation and gas flow from the central engine to produce the observed bipolar elongation on kpc scales.

If this is right

  • The central engine directly influences the host galaxy on kpc scales through a narrow opening angle channel.
  • The elongated emission traces either a slow outflow or a quasi-static ionization cone.
  • Little red dots can reveal more complex internal structures when observed at sub-kpc resolution in both UV and optical lines.
  • This geometry may be observable in other little red dots where extended UV morphology is already detected.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If narrow channels like this are common, they could allow central activity to affect gas reservoirs without fully disrupting the compact appearance at optical wavelengths.
  • The structure offers a test case for whether early black hole activity shapes galaxy morphology before widespread star formation dominates.
  • Follow-up observations at different wavelengths could distinguish between outflow and ionization-cone scenarios by mapping temperature or density gradients along the axis.

Load-bearing premise

The radiative-transfer modeling of the integrated Lyα profile accurately captures the geometry as a biconical low-column-density cavity connected to the central engine, and the spatial alignment of the blue peak and N V with the elongation confirms this link rather than unrelated structures.

What would settle it

Independent higher-resolution integral-field spectroscopy that shows the velocity field along the elongation does not match the slow expansion or the expected biconical flow pattern from the Lyα modeling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18342 by Christina C. Williams, George H. Rieke, Jianwei Lyu, Marcia Rieke, Mauro Giavalisco, Michael V. Maseda, Sandro Tacchella, Yang Sun, Yongda Zhu, Zhiyuan Ji.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: NIRCam imaging and NIRSpec/PRISM spectrum of LRD-204851 at zsys = 5.482. Top row: Three NIRCam RGB cutouts at the native resolution, all shown with a common linear stretch. The left panel uses three continuum filters; the middle panel highlights [O iii]+Hβ; and the right panel highlights Hα+[N ii] in green. The target is a compact red point source in F460M, but shows a remarkably elongated blue continuum e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: MUSE spectrum (black) of the Lyα region with the Bicone X Slab Out best-fit model (orange) overlaid. The cyan, red, and pink bands mark the disjoint windows used to build the blue-component, red-core, and red-wing narrow-band maps (see Section 3.3). The lower sub-panel shows the fit residuals with ±1σ (grey band) and ±3σ (dashed) reference levels. The full posterior is shown in Appendix B. Right: MUS… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: MUSE narrow-band maps of the multi-component Lyα emission and the tentative N v λ1238 detection in LRD-204851. From left to right: the blue Lyα component, the red Lyα core, the red Lyα wing, and the N v λ1238 narrow-band map. Per-panel color stretches saturate at the 99.5th percentile and use a lower limit of 1σ for the displayed map, so structures below the noise level fade to white. The black dashed cont… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Optical emission-line maps of LRD-204851 constructed using NIRCam imaging. From left to right: [O III], Hα+[N II], and Hβ. The top row shows the maps alone; the bottom row overlays the MUSE red (magenta) and blue (cyan) Lyα component contours and the tentative N v λ1238 contour (green dashed), with the NIRCam/F460M continuum centroid marked by the blue ×. All panels share a common color scale of line flux … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Azimuthally averaged radial surface-brightness profiles of the optical emission-line maps in LRD-204851 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Map of the line ratio log10([O III] / Hα+[N II]) in LRD-204851, derived from the line maps shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: MUSE-to-NIRCam astrometric correction. Left: PDF of the per-source offsets for reference sources before (top) and after (bottom) correction. Right: 2-D astrometric residuals; the red dashed ellipse marks ±1 mean absolute deviation (MAD) about the median. After correction both medians are zero. logVexp = 2.044 +0.032 0.037 21.20 21.25 21.30 21.35 lo g N HI[c m 2 ] log NHI = 21.275 +0.039 0.032 0.56 0.52 0.4… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Joint and marginal posterior distributions for the four sampled parameters, zLyα, log Vexp, log NHI, and log τa, under the Bicone X Slab Out geometry, which best reproduces the observed Lyα profile of LRD-204851 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Best-fit zELDA Lyα profiles for the three alternative gas geometries, overlaid on the observed MUSE Lyα spectrum (black, with 1σ shading). The Bicone X Slab Out model is shown in all panels as a red dashed line for comparison. The bottom panels show the residuals, demonstrating that Bicone X Slab Out outperforms the other three geometries. by the data (|∆ log Z|>5 corresponds to “decisive” evidence, and |∆… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Little Red Dots (LRDs) appear extremely compact at rest-frame optical wavelengths, yet many show extended rest-frame UV morphology revealing more complex internal structure. We present a combined analysis of VLT/MUSE rest-frame UV integral-field spectroscopy and continuum-subtracted [O III], H$\beta$, and H$\alpha$+[N II] emission-line maps from JWST/NIRCam imaging at sub-kpc resolution for LRD-204851 at $z=5.482$ in GOODS-S. We find that LRD-204851 hosts a remarkably thin, bipolar, elongated structure passing through the optical continuum centroid and extending several kpc on either side, traced by both the UV continuum and the rest-frame optical emission lines, with a bright [O III] clump-like structure $\sim$2 kpc to the south-east of the centroid. The MUSE observations reveal a double-peaked Ly$\alpha$ profile, with a broad and bright near-systemic red peak and a relatively faint peak blueshifted by $\sim$430 km s$^{-1}$, accompanied by a tentative N V $\lambda 1238$ detection at similar velocity. In narrow-band imaging extracted from the MUSE IFU cube, both the blue Ly$\alpha$ peak and the tentative N V emission lean toward this same south-eastern direction. Independently, radiative-transfer modeling of the integrated Ly$\alpha$ profile favors a biconical low-column-density cavity in a dense, slowly expanding neutral envelope, in support of the bipolar geometry traced by the line maps. Together, these results suggest that the elongated emission of LRD-204851 is connected to radiation and/or gas flow from its central engine through a low-column-density channel with a small opening angle that may trace either a slow outflow or a quasi-static ionization cone. LRD-204851 is one of the first LRDs where the central engine's impact on its host galaxy is potentially directly observable on kpc scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents VLT/MUSE IFU spectroscopy and JWST/NIRCam imaging of LRD-204851 at z=5.482, reporting a thin bipolar kpc-scale elongation traced by UV continuum and rest-frame optical lines ([O III], Hβ, Hα), a double-peaked Lyα profile (systemic red peak plus blue peak at −430 km s⁻¹) with tentative NV at similar velocity, and radiative-transfer modeling of the integrated Lyα that favors a biconical low-column-density cavity in a dense slowly expanding envelope. The authors interpret the spatial alignment of the blue Lyα and NV with the south-eastern elongation as evidence that the structure traces a low-column channel from the central engine, possibly a slow outflow or ionization cone.

Significance. If the geometric interpretation holds, this would be one of the first LRDs in which the central engine's influence on the host is directly observable on kpc scales, providing a concrete example of feedback or ionization structure in a high-redshift compact object. The multi-wavelength dataset (MUSE IFU + NIRCam line maps) and the attempt to connect integrated spectroscopy to spatially resolved morphology are strengths; the work adds to the emerging picture of complex internal structure in LRDs beyond their compact optical appearance.

major comments (2)
  1. [radiative-transfer modeling] Radiative-transfer modeling section: the statement that the modeling 'favors' a biconical low-column-density cavity is presented without quantitative comparison (χ², Bayes factor, or posterior odds) to standard alternative mechanisms that also produce double-peaked Lyα (expanding spherical shell, static slab with velocity gradient, or resonant scattering in a clumpy medium). This comparison is required to establish that the biconical geometry is necessary rather than merely possible, and is load-bearing for the claim that the kpc-scale elongation traces a channel connected to the central engine.
  2. [MUSE narrow-band imaging and alignment analysis] Results on spatial alignment: the claim that the blue Lyα peak and tentative NV 'lean toward' the south-eastern elongation is used to confirm physical connection, yet no quantitative measure of the alignment significance, position angle uncertainty, or chance probability is provided. Without this, the link between the integrated profile modeling and the observed bipolar morphology remains qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods and results] The manuscript would benefit from explicit error analysis on the Lyα velocity shift and on the spatial offset of the blue peak, including how these uncertainties propagate into the geometric interpretation.
  2. [figure captions] Figure captions and text should clarify the exact extraction aperture and continuum-subtraction procedure used for the [O III] and Hα maps to allow reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and for recognizing the potential significance of the multi-wavelength dataset on LRD-204851. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Radiative-transfer modeling section: the statement that the modeling 'favors' a biconical low-column-density cavity is presented without quantitative comparison (χ², Bayes factor, or posterior odds) to standard alternative mechanisms that also produce double-peaked Lyα (expanding spherical shell, static slab with velocity gradient, or resonant scattering in a clumpy medium). This comparison is required to establish that the biconical geometry is necessary rather than merely possible, and is load-bearing for the claim that the kpc-scale elongation traces a channel connected to the central engine.

    Authors: We agree that the current text presents the biconical model as favored without the requested quantitative comparisons to alternatives. The model choice was guided by the observed bipolar morphology, but the integrated Lyα profile alone does not uniquely require it. In the revised manuscript we will add χ² comparisons to at least one alternative (expanding spherical shell) and discuss the limitations of the modeling or include Bayes-factor estimates where feasible. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results on spatial alignment: the claim that the blue Lyα peak and tentative NV 'lean toward' the south-eastern elongation is used to confirm physical connection, yet no quantitative measure of the alignment significance, position angle uncertainty, or chance probability is provided. Without this, the link between the integrated profile modeling and the observed bipolar morphology remains qualitative.

    Authors: The alignment is currently described qualitatively. We will revise the results section to include quantitative measures: position-angle values with uncertainties extracted from the MUSE narrow-band images, and an estimate of chance-alignment probability based on the source extent and noise properties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in observational analysis

full rationale

The paper presents an observational study using MUSE IFU spectroscopy and JWST/NIRCam imaging of LRD-204851. Claims about bipolar elongation and its connection to the central engine are based on direct spatial alignments in line maps, double-peaked Lyα profiles, and independent radiative-transfer modeling of the integrated profile. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps appear in the text. The analysis is self-contained against external data and modeling benchmarks, with no reductions by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is observational and relies on standard assumptions in high-redshift spectroscopy and radiative transfer; no major free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond measured quantities.

free parameters (1)
  • Lyα velocity shift
    The ~430 km s^{-1} blueshift is a direct measurement from the spectrum rather than a fitted model parameter.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Radiative-transfer models of Lyα accurately distinguish biconical cavity geometry from other configurations
    Invoked to interpret the double-peaked profile as supporting the bipolar structure seen in maps.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5948 in / 1353 out tokens · 32841 ms · 2026-06-26T23:46:15.339849+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  2. [2]

    H., Jagannathan, P., & Nyland, K

    Alberts, S., Rujopakarn, W., Rieke, G. H., Jagannathan, P., & Nyland, K. 2020, ApJ, 901, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb1a0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb1a0 2020

  3. [3]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, ApJS, 178, 20, doi: 10.1086/589652

    work page doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  4. [4]

    2017, A&A, 608, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730833

    Bacon, R., Conseil, S., Mary, D., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730833

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730833 2017

  5. [5]

    2023, A&A, 670, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244187

    Bacon, R., Brinchmann, J., Conseil, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244187

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244187 2023

  6. [6]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  7. [7]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e 2024

  8. [8]

    D., & Bolton, J

    Becker, G. D., & Bolton, J. S. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 1023, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1610

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1610 2013

  9. [9]

    Beckwith, S. V. W., Stiavelli, M., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1729, doi: 10.1086/507302

    work page doi:10.1086/507302 2006

  10. [10]

    C., Blandford, R

    Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. 1984, Reviews of Modern Physics, 56, 255, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.56.255

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.56.255 1984

  11. [11]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Becker, G. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 55, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1046

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1046 2022

  12. [12]

    2016, A&A, 596, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    Boucaud, A., Bocchio, M., Abergel, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629080 2016

  13. [13]

    L., & Barthel, P

    Carilli, C. L., & Barthel, P. D. 1996, A&A Rv, 7, 1, doi: 10.1007/s001590050001

    work page doi:10.1007/s001590050001 1996

  14. [14]

    2023, A&A, 672, A128, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346001 14 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R

    Cresci, G., Tozzi, G., Perna, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A128, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346001 14 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.21820 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, A&A, 701, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554681

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346001 2023

  15. [15]

    2006, ApJ, 649, 14, doi: 10.1086/506243

    Dijkstra, M., Haiman, Z., & Spaans, M. 2006, ApJ, 649, 14, doi: 10.1086/506243

    work page doi:10.1086/506243 2006

  16. [16]

    A., & Sutherland, R

    Dopita, M. A., & Sutherland, R. S. 1996, ApJS, 102, 161, doi: 10.1086/192255

    work page doi:10.1086/192255 1996

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Eisenstein, D. J., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B., et al. 2025, ApJS, 281, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1137

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae1137 2025

  18. [18]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163 2026

  19. [19]

    K., Li, Z., Steidel, C

    Erb, D. K., Li, Z., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd849

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd849 2023

  20. [20]

    J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8 2024

  21. [21]

    C., Koekemoer, A

    Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 600, L93, doi: 10.1086/379232

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/379232 2004

  22. [22]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f , archiveprefix =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  23. [23]

    2016, ApJ, 826, 14, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/14

    Gronke, M., & Dijkstra, M. 2016, ApJ, 826, 14, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/14

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/14 2016

  24. [24]

    Gronke, M., Dijkstra, M., McCourt, M., & Oh, S. P. 2017, A&A, 607, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731013 Gurung-L´ opez, S., Gronke, M., Saito, S., Bonoli, S., & Orsi, ´A. A. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 4525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3554 Gurung-L´ opez, S., Orsi,´A. A., & Bonoli, S. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 733, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2591

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731013 2017

  25. [25]

    N., Shapley, A

    Hainline, K. N., Shapley, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Steidel, C. C. 2011, ApJ, 733, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/31

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/733/1/31 2011

  26. [26]

    1999, ARA&A, 37, 487, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.487

    Hamann, F., & Ferland, G. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 487, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.487

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.487 1999

  27. [27]

    Hansen, M., & Oh, S. P. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 979, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09870.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09870.x 2006

  28. [28]

    M., Cowie, L

    Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., et al. 2016, ApJL, 825, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/825/1/L7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/825/1/l7 2016

  29. [29]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  30. [30]

    K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M

    Inoue, A. K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1805, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu936

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu936 2014

  31. [31]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  32. [32]

    Through the Veil: Ly$\alpha$ Illuminates the Host Galaxies of Little Red Dots

    Ji, Z., Sun, Y., Giavalisco, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.09970, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.09970

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.09970 2026

  33. [33]

    C., Tacchella, S., et al

    Ji, Z., Williams, C. C., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e7f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e7f 2024

  34. [34]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L69, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf194

    Ji, Z., Alberts, S., Zhu, Y., et al. 2025, ApJL, 988, L69, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf194

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf194 2025

  35. [35]

    D., Robertson, B

    Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B. E., Eisenstein, D. J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15954, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15954 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag086, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag086

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15954 2026

  36. [36]

    E., & Raftery, A

    Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773, doi: 10.2307/2291091

    work page doi:10.2307/2291091 1995

  37. [37]

    J., Nicholls, D

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 2019

  38. [38]

    2024, A&A, 691, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348857 2024

  39. [39]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  40. [40]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al

    Kokorev, V., Fujimoto, S., Labbe, I., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a 2023

  41. [41]

    Laursen, P., Sommer-Larsen, J., & Razoumov, A. O. 2011, ApJ, 728, 52, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/52

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/728/1/52 2011

  42. [42]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 5034, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1207

    Li, Z., & Gronke, M. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 5034, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1207

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1207 2022

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Keel, W., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 129, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15299.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15299.x 2009

  44. [44]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y. 2025, ApJ, 994, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19 2025

  45. [45]

    H., & Rujopakarn, W

    Lyu, J., Alberts, S., Rieke, G. H., & Rujopakarn, W. 2022, ApJ, 941, 191, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e5d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e5d 2022

  46. [46]

    H., Stone, M., et al

    Lyu, J., Rieke, G. H., Stone, M., et al. 2025, ApJL, 981, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb613

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb613 2025

  47. [47]

    1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    Madau, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    work page doi:10.1086/175332 1995

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  49. [49]

    2018, A&A, 619, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833528

    Matthee, J., Sobral, D., Gronke, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833528

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833528 2018

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  51. [51]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17667 2026

  52. [52]

    McCarthy, P. J. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 639, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.003231

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.003231 1993

  53. [53]

    Morton, D. C. 2003, ApJS, 149, 205, doi: 10.1086/377639 15

    work page doi:10.1086/377639 2003

  54. [54]

    S., Wilson, A

    Mulchaey, J. S., Wilson, A. S., & Tsvetanov, Z. 1996, ApJ, 467, 197, doi: 10.1086/177595

    work page doi:10.1086/177595 1996

  55. [55]

    A., Marchesini, D., et al

    Muzzin, A., Suess, K. A., Marchesini, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.19706, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.19706

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.19706 2025

  56. [56]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596 O’Dea, C. P. 1998, PASP, 110, 493, doi: 10.1086/316162

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  57. [57]

    A., Brammer, G., Naidu, R

    Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2864, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2411

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2411 2023

  58. [58]

    R., Ciardi, D

    Orsi, A., Lacey, C. G., & Baugh, C. M. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 87, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21396.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21396.x 2012

  59. [59]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    Pacucci, F., & Narayan, R. 2024, ApJ, 976, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7 2024

  60. [60]

    Double-Peaked Ly$\alpha$ Emission during Reionization Requires Nearby Voids and a Favorable Local Ionizing Background

    Park, H., Smith, A., Jung, I., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.26331, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.26331

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.26331 2026

  61. [61]

    2007, PASP, 119, 30, doi: 10.1086/510600 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P

    Pascual, S., Gallego, J., & Zamorano, J. 2007, PASP, 119, 30, doi: 10.1086/510600 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb

    work page doi:10.1086/510600 2007

  62. [62]

    2025, A&A, 693, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452422

    Perger, K., Fogasy, J., Frey, S., & Gab´ anyi, K.´E. 2025, A&A, 693, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452422

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452422 2025

  63. [63]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. J. M. Oschmann, Jr., M. Clampin, G. G. Fazio, & H. A. MacEwen, 91433X, doi: 10.1117/12.2056689

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056689 2014

  64. [64]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Piqueras, L., Conseil, S., Shepherd, M., et al. 2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 521, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVI, ed. M. Molinaro, K. Shortridge, & F. Pasian, 545 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2019

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    Rieke, M. J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d 2023

  66. [66]

    E., Johnson, B

    Robertson, B. E., Johnson, B. D., Tacchella, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15956, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15956

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15956 2026

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4 2026

  68. [68]

    Speagle, J. S. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3132, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa278

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa278 2020

  69. [69]

    F., et al

    Micchi, L. F., et al. 2018, ApJ, 868, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae7cd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae7cd 2018

  70. [70]

    A., Weaver, J

    Suess, K. A., Weaver, J. R., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe 2024

  71. [71]

    S., & Dopita, M

    Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. 2017, ApJS, 229, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541 2017

  72. [72]

    2016, A&A Rv, 24, 10, doi: 10.1007/s00159-016-0094-x

    Tadhunter, C. 2016, A&A Rv, 24, 10, doi: 10.1007/s00159-016-0094-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-016-0094-x 2016

  73. [73]

    P., et al

    Torralba, A., Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450318

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450318 2024

  74. [74]

    D., Hviding, R

    Treiber, H., Kocevski, D. D., Hviding, R. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 217, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57 ¨Ubler, H., D’Eugenio, F., Perna, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 4287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1993

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57 2025

  75. [75]

    W., Pedlar, A., Axon, D

    Unger, S. W., Pedlar, A., Axon, D. J., et al. 1987, MNRAS, 228, 671, doi: 10.1093/mnras/228.3.671 Vanden Berk, D. E., Richards, G. T., Bauer, A., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 549, doi: 10.1086/321167

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/228.3.671 1987

  76. [76]

    Veilleux, S., & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS, 63, 295, doi: 10.1086/191166

    work page doi:10.1086/191166 1987

  77. [77]

    2008, A&A, 491, 89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809648

    Verhamme, A., Schaerer, D., Atek, H., & Tapken, C. 2008, A&A, 491, 89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809648

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809648 2008

  78. [78]

    2006, A&A, 460, 397, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065554

    Verhamme, A., Schaerer, D., & Maselli, A. 2006, A&A, 460, 397, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065554

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065554 2006

  79. [79]

    L., et al

    Wang, B., de Graaff, A., Davies, R. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc1ca

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc1ca 2025

  80. [80]

    C., Tacchella, S., Maseda, M

    Williams, C. C., Tacchella, S., Maseda, M. V., et al. 2023, ApJS, 268, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acf130

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acf130 2023

Showing first 80 references.