pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20209 · v1 · pith:PY42VTMFnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI

FlowMaps: Modeling Long-Term Multimodal Object Dynamics with Flow Matching

Francesco Argenziano , Miguel Saavedra-Ruiz , Sacha Morin , Charlie Gauthier , Daniele Nardi , Liam Paull This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 17:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AI
keywords flow matchingobject dynamicsrobot navigationmultimodal distributions3D scene understandingdynamic environmentshousehold robotics
0
0 comments X

The pith

FlowMaps models future object locations in homes as continuous multimodal distributions using flow matching.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents FlowMaps as a way for robots to anticipate how people will move objects around in everyday spaces. Human routines create predictable shifts in where items end up, and the model learns these patterns from past observations to forecast likely future positions in three-dimensional space. Instead of guessing single spots, it produces full distributions that capture multiple possibilities at once. This information then guides a robot's search and movement decisions in both simulated and physical household settings. The result is better performance than prior methods across hundreds of navigation episodes.

Core claim

FlowMaps is a latent flow matching model for estimating multimodal distributions over the future locations of dynamic objects in a continuous 3D space. By learning the implicit dependencies among objects and their temporal evolution, it predicts likely changes in object locations conditioned on past human interactions while supporting generalization across previously unseen environments that share similar object routines.

What carries the argument

A latent flow matching model that generates continuous multimodal spatio-temporal distributions of object positions from learned object dependencies and temporal patterns.

If this is right

  • Robots can use the predicted distributions to plan searches that account for multiple possible object positions rather than fixed locations.
  • Conditioning on past interactions allows the model to adapt predictions to observed human behavior in a given setting.
  • Generalization to unseen environments occurs when those environments follow comparable daily routines.
  • Continuous modeling supports navigation tasks that require reasoning over extended time periods in changing scenes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same distribution-based forecasts could be tested for predicting object states in non-household settings such as offices or retail spaces that have their own recurring patterns.
  • Integrating the flow matching outputs with short-term physics models might extend reliable predictions to longer horizons than the current training data covers.
  • If the learned distributions prove robust, they could serve as priors for other perception modules that must handle uncertainty in object identity across time.

Load-bearing premise

Human habits and routines produce spatio-temporally consistent patterns in object locations that can be learned from data and that transfer to new environments with similar routines.

What would settle it

Measure whether performance gains disappear when the model is deployed in an environment whose object placement routines differ markedly from those in the training data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20209 by Charlie Gauthier, Daniele Nardi, Francesco Argenziano, Liam Paull, Miguel Saavedra-Ruiz, Sacha Morin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the latent FM network components: (a) the map en￾coder, and (b) the CDiT block. Map encoder. At each timestep, the scene is a padded set Mτ of at most NO + NBG object tokens, with max￾imum length S. Each token represents either a dynamic object or a static background object through a 3D axis￾aligned bounding box b, semantic label l, and object-type flag fobj . Following Wald et al. [35], this f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Training (left) and inference (right) pipeline for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FlowMaps deployed in a real-world environment. A second limitation concerns the amount of data needed to train the models. In our experi￾ments, ProcTHOR enabled us to generate sufficient training data for the considered setup. How￾ever, extending the approach to more general environments would likely require compara￾ble data, possibly without access to the same simulation tools. One direction to mitigate t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Different spatio-temporal behaviors of the same object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An overview of 30 ProcTHOR environments coming from the validation split. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: VAE used to encode and decode object tokens in a Proc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Success and failure decomposition for ObjNav episodes across habits. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Representative successful ObjNav episodes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Joint spatial and temporal understanding of 3D scenes is a crucial requirement for robots deployed in everyday household environments. Such agents must not only comprehend and navigate spatial layouts, but also reason about how these spaces evolve over time. In particular, humans interact with objects daily, causing them to change position throughout the environment and making it difficult for robots to reliably associate current observations with previously seen objects. However, these interactions are not random: human habits and routines induce spatio-temporally consistent patterns in object locations, which robotic agents can potentially learn and then exploit for downstream tasks such as navigation. To this end, we introduce FlowMaps, a latent flow matching model for estimating multimodal distributions over the future locations of dynamic objects in a continuous 3D space. By learning the implicit dependencies among objects and their temporal evolution, FlowMaps predicts likely changes in object locations conditioned on past human interactions, while supporting generalization across previously unseen environments that share similar object routines. To demonstrate the utility of this method, we deploy FlowMaps in a downstream dynamic Object Navigation task in both simulated and real-world environments. Across more than 600 episodes, FlowMaps outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, showing that modeling object dynamics through continuous, multimodal spatio-temporal distributions improves robotic search and navigation in changing household environments. Code and additional material is available at https://fra-tsuna.github.io/flowmaps/.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces FlowMaps, a latent flow matching model for estimating multimodal distributions over future locations of dynamic objects in continuous 3D space. Conditioned on past human interactions, it learns implicit object dependencies and temporal evolution to predict location changes, with claimed generalization to unseen environments sharing similar routines. The method is evaluated on a downstream dynamic Object Navigation task, reporting outperformance over state-of-the-art approaches across more than 600 episodes in simulated and real-world household settings. Code is made available.

Significance. If the empirical results and modeling approach hold under scrutiny, the work offers a continuous multimodal formulation for long-term spatio-temporal object dynamics via flow matching, which could improve robotic navigation in dynamic household scenes. The scale of the evaluation (>600 episodes, sim+real) and public code release are strengths that support reproducibility and allow direct assessment of the generalization premise based on human routine patterns.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the outperformance claim would be strengthened by including at least one quantitative metric (e.g., success rate delta or SPL) rather than the qualitative statement alone.
  2. [Abstract] The generalization claim in the abstract rests on the premise that environments share similar routines; a brief discussion of how this is operationalized (e.g., via conditioning features) would clarify the scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the work, recognition of the evaluation scale (>600 episodes across sim and real), and recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the public code release supporting reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model is data-driven with external validation

full rationale

The paper introduces a latent flow-matching model trained on observed human-object interaction data to predict multimodal spatio-temporal distributions. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are presented in the provided text that reduce predictions to inputs by construction. Performance claims rest on empirical results across >600 episodes in simulated and real environments, not on fitted parameters renamed as predictions or self-referential assumptions. The core premise (human routines induce learnable patterns) is an external modeling assumption, not a tautology internal to any derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no equations or implementation details, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be enumerated; typical latent models would introduce at least a latent dimension hyperparameter and assumptions about the data distribution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5792 in / 1054 out tokens · 26088 ms · 2026-06-26T17:03:28.088615+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mois and J

    G. Mois and J. M. Beer. The role of healthcare robotics in providing support to older adults: a socio-ecological perspective.Current Geriatrics Reports, 9(2):82–89, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    R. J. L ´opez-Sastre, M. Baptista-R ´ıos, F. J. Acevedo-Rodr ´ıguez, S. Pacheco-da Costa, S. Maldonado-Basc ´on, and S. Lafuente-Arroyo. A low-cost assistive robot for children with neurodevelopmental disorders to aid in daily living activities.International Journal of Envi- ronmental Research and Public Health, 18(8):3974, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    ImmFusion: Robust mmWave-RGB Fusion for 3D Human Body Reconstruction in All Weather Conditions,

    S. Rudra, S. Goel, A. Santara, C. Gentile, L. Perron, F. Xia, V . Sindhwani, C. Parada, and G. Aggarwal. A contextual bandit approach for learning to plan in environments with proba- bilistic goal configurations. In2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion (ICRA), pages 5645–5652, 2023. doi:10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160473

    work page doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10160473 2023

  4. [4]

    N. F. Troje. Retrieving information from human movement patterns.Understanding events: From perception to action, 4:308–334, 2008

    2008

  5. [5]

    Schmid, J

    L. Schmid, J. Delmerico, J. L. Sch¨onberger, J. Nieto, M. Pollefeys, R. Siegwart, and C. Cadena. Panoptic multi-tsdfs: a flexible representation for online multi-resolution volumetric mapping and long-term dynamic scene consistency. In2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 8018–8024. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Yugay, T

    V . Yugay, T. Kersten, L. Carlone, T. Gevers, M. R. Oswald, and L. Schmid. Gaussian mapping for evolving scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06909, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Peebles and S

    W. Peebles and S. Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Deitke, E

    M. Deitke, E. VanderBilt, A. Herrasti, L. Weihs, J. Salvador, K. Ehsani, W. Han, E. Kolve, A. Farhadi, A. Kembhavi, and R. Mottaghi. ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generation. InNeurIPS, 2022. Outstanding Paper Award

    2022

  9. [9]

    Li and M

    K. Li and M. Q.-H. Meng. Personalizing a service robot by learning human habits from be- havioral footprints.Engineering, 1(1):079–084, 2015

    2015

  10. [10]

    Irfan, A

    B. Irfan, A. Ramachandran, S. Spaulding, D. F. Glas, I. Leite, and K. L. Koay. Personalization in long-term human-robot interaction. In2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 685–686. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  11. [11]

    J. Sung, C. Ponce, B. Selman, and A. Saxena. Unstructured human activity detection from rgbd images. In2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pages 842–849. IEEE, 2012

    2012

  12. [12]

    H. S. Koppula and A. Saxena. Anticipating human activities using object affordances for reactive robotic response.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 38 (1):14–29, 2015

    2015

  13. [13]

    Baraglia, M

    J. Baraglia, M. Cakmak, Y . Nagai, R. P. Rao, and M. Asada. Efficient human-robot collabora- tion: when should a robot take initiative?The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36 (5-7):563–579, 2017

    2017

  14. [14]

    Hoffman and C

    G. Hoffman and C. Breazeal. Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork ef- ficiency, fluency, and perception of team. InProceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pages 1–8, 2007

    2007

  15. [15]

    Buyukgoz, J

    S. Buyukgoz, J. Grosinger, M. Chetouani, and A. Saffiotti. Two ways to make your robot proactive: Reasoning about human intentions or reasoning about possible futures.Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9:929267, 2022. 26

    2022

  16. [16]

    M. K. van Den Broek and T. B. Moeslund. What is proactive human-robot interaction?-a re- view of a progressive field and its definitions.ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 13(4):1–30, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Patel and S

    M. Patel and S. Chernova. Proactive robot assistance via spatio-temporal object modeling. In K. Liu, D. Kulic, and J. Ichnowski, editors,Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 205 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 881–891. PMLR, 14–18 Dec 2023. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v205/patel23a.html

    2023

  18. [18]

    cat-shaped mug

    V . S. Dorbala, J. F. Mullen, and D. Manocha. Can an embodied agent find your “cat-shaped mug”? llm-based zero-shot object navigation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 9(5): 4083–4090, 2023

    2023

  19. [19]

    Rajvanshi, K

    A. Rajvanshi, K. Sikka, X. Lin, B. Lee, H.-P. Chiu, and A. Velasquez. Saynav: Grounding large language models for dynamic planning to navigation in new environments. InProceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, volume 34, pages 464– 474, 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    Y . Zhu, R. Mottaghi, E. Kolve, J. J. Lim, A. Gupta, L. Fei-Fei, and A. Farhadi. Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning. In2017 IEEE interna- tional conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 3357–3364. ieee, 2017

    2017

  21. [21]

    V . S. Dorbala, B. Patel, A. S. Bedi, and D. Manocha. Personalized embodied navigation for portable object finding, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09905

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    C. Wang, X. Li, D. Wang, H. Liu, et al. Dynamic scene generation for embodied navigation benchmark. InRSS 2024 Workshop: Data Generation for Robotics, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Kurenkov, M

    A. Kurenkov, M. Lingelbach, T. Agarwal, E. Jin, C. Li, R. Zhang, L. Fei-Fei, J. Wu, S. Savarese, and R. Martın-Martın. Modeling dynamic environments with scene graph mem- ory. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 17976–17993. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  24. [24]

    O’Neill, A

    A. O’Neill, A. Rehman, A. Maddukuri, A. Gupta, A. Padalkar, A. Lee, A. Pooley, A. Gupta, A. Mandlekar, A. Jain, et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6892–6903. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  25. [25]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    Z. Hou, T. Zhang, Y . Xiong, H. Pu, C. Zhao, R. Tong, Y . Qiao, J. Dai, and Y . Chen. Diffusion transformer policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15959, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Chisari, N

    E. Chisari, N. Heppert, M. Argus, T. Welschehold, T. Brox, and A. Valada. Learning robotic manipulation policies from point clouds with conditional flow matching. InConference on Robot Learning, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Zhang and M

    F. Zhang and M. Gienger. Affordance-based robot manipulation with flow matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01083, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Black, N

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, et al. pi0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. P. Foster, P. R. Sanketi, Q. Vuong, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 2679–2713. PMLR, 2025. 27

    2025

  31. [31]

    Lipman, M

    Y . Lipman, M. Havasi, P. Holderrieth, N. Shaul, M. Le, B. Karrer, R. T. Q. Chen, D. Lopez- Paz, H. Ben-Hamu, and I. Gat. Flow matching guide and code, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2412.06264

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Holderrieth and E

    P. Holderrieth and E. Erives. Introduction to flow matching and diffusion models, 2026. URL https://diffusion.csail.mit.edu/

    2026

  33. [33]

    A. Bar, G. Zhou, D. Tran, T. Darrell, and Y . LeCun. Navigation world models. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 15791–15801, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Bowman, L

    S. Bowman, L. Vilnis, O. Vinyals, A. Dai, R. Jozefowicz, and S. Bengio. Generating sentences from a continuous space. InProceedings of the 20th SIGNLL conference on computational natural language learning, pages 10–21, 2016

    2016

  35. [35]

    J. Wald, H. Dhamo, N. Navab, and F. Tombari. Learning 3d semantic scene graphs from 3d indoor reconstructions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3961–3970, 2020

    2020

  36. [36]

    Lipman, R

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Q. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le. Flow matching for generative modeling. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=PqvMRDCJT9t

    2023

  37. [37]

    A. Tong, K. FATRAS, N. Malkin, G. Huguet, Y . Zhang, J. Rector-Brooks, G. Wolf, and Y . Bengio. Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch opti- mal transport.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024. ISSN 2835-8856. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=CD9Snc73AW. Expert Certification

    2024

  38. [38]

    Pooladian, H

    A.-A. Pooladian, H. Ben-Hamu, C. Domingo-Enrich, B. Amos, Y . Lipman, and R. T. Q. Chen. Multisample flow matching: Straightening flows with minibatch couplings. In A. Krause, E. Brunskill, K. Cho, B. Engelhardt, S. Sabato, and J. Scarlett, editors,Pro- ceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202 ofPro- ceedings of Machin...

    2023

  39. [39]

    Gupta, J

    A. Gupta, J. Johnson, L. Fei-Fei, S. Savarese, and A. Alahi. Social gan: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2255–2264, 2018

    2018

  40. [40]

    M. F. Naeem, S. J. Oh, Y . Uh, Y . Choi, and J. Yoo. Reliable fidelity and diversity metrics for generative models. In H. D. III and A. Singh, editors,Proceedings of the 37th Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning, volume 119 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 7176–7185. PMLR, 13–18 Jul 2020. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr. press/v119/n...

    2020

  41. [41]

    Kolve, R

    E. Kolve, R. Mottaghi, W. Han, E. VanderBilt, L. Weihs, A. Herrasti, D. Gordon, Y . Zhu, A. Gupta, and A. Farhadi. AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AI.arXiv, 2017

    2017

  42. [42]

    Ester, H.-P

    M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD’96, page 226–231. AAAI Press, 1996

    1996

  43. [43]

    Anderson, A

    P. Anderson, A. Chang, D. S. Chaplot, A. Dosovitskiy, S. Gupta, V . Koltun, J. Kosecka, J. Ma- lik, R. Mottaghi, M. Savva, et al. On evaluation of embodied navigation agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06757, 2018. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018