pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24582 · v1 · pith:YESBJ7CJnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Analytic electromagnetic signatures of compact pentaquark structure: A multi-current QCD light-cone sum rules analysis of the P_(psi s)^(Λ) states

Ula\c{s} \"Ozdem This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 23:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords pentaquarkslight-cone sum ruleselectromagnetic momentsQCD sum ruleshidden-charmcompact structuremagnetic momentsflavor ratios
0
0 comments X

The pith

Light-cone sum rules on four currents fix light-quark magnetic moment ratio at exactly -2 for compact pentaquarks, with charm contribution vanishing in one case.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that multi-current QCD light-cone sum rules applied to hidden-charm pentaquarks enforce exact algebraic relations among flavor contributions to electromagnetic moments. These relations include a universal light-quark ratio μ_u/μ_d = -2 across all currents and a vanishing charm contribution for the J3 current arising from Dirac structure. A sympathetic reader would care because mass spectra alone cannot distinguish compact diquark-diquark-antiquark from molecular pictures, while these flavor-decomposed signatures supply independent, falsifiable tests. The computed moments reach 1-3 nuclear magnetons, exceeding typical quark-model and molecular expectations, and contrast with molecular analyses that produce a ratio of -1/2 instead.

Core claim

The central claim is that the light-quark contributions satisfy μ_u/μ_d = e_u/e_d = -2 in all four currents J1(x)-J4(x) because they share a common Lorentz-color kernel, while for the J3(x) current the charm contribution vanishes identically from the Dirac structure of the anti-charm coupling. The total moments extracted via LCSR are μ_J1 = -1.35 μ_N, μ_J2 = 3.14 μ_N, μ_J3 = 1.01 μ_N and μ_J4 = -1.79 μ_N. These values remain valid independent of which current is assigned to which observed P_ψs^Λ state and exceed the magnitudes expected from quark models or heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory.

What carries the argument

The four diquark-diquark-antiquark interpolating currents J1(x) to J4(x) with J^P = 1/2^- together with the LCSR correlation functions that enforce the algebraic flavor relations.

If this is right

  • The two signatures remain valid independent of any specific state-to-current pairing.
  • The extracted magnitudes lie in the range 1-3 nuclear magnetons and exceed quark-model and heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory expectations of less than 0.5 nuclear magnetons.
  • The same LCSR procedure applied to prior molecular analyses produces a light-quark ratio of -1/2 rather than -2, supplying an internal contrast at the flavor-decomposed level.
  • The predictions accommodate either the P_ψs^Λ(4338) or P_ψs^Λ(4459) state within the quoted uncertainties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of the fixed ratios would motivate direct experimental searches for electromagnetic moments of pentaquarks as a structure diagnostic.
  • The algebraic relations could be checked in lattice QCD calculations of the same matrix elements.
  • Similar multi-current analyses might be applied to other exotic hadrons to extract comparable flavor signatures.

Load-bearing premise

The four chosen interpolating currents accurately represent the compact diquark-diquark-antiquark structure of the physical states and the LCSR correlation functions capture the electromagnetic matrix elements without dominant higher-twist or continuum contamination.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of pentaquark magnetic moments in which the light-quark ratio deviates from -2 or the charm contribution for the J3 current is nonzero would falsify the compact-structure signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24582 by Ula\c{s} \"Ozdem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. CVG analysis (left panels), PC analysis (middle panels), and total value (right panels) for the magnetic dipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Flavor-decomposed contributions to the magnetic moment of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of theoretical predictions for the magnetic moment of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Probing the internal organization of hidden-charm pentaquarks -- including the spin-color correlations that distinguish compact diquark-diquark-antiquark configurations from loosely bound hadronic molecules -- requires observables beyond mass spectroscopy. We argue that multi-current QCD light-cone sum rules (LCSR) provide a diagnostic framework through exact analytic relations among flavor-sector contributions enforced by the algebra of the interpolating currents. We identify two such signatures: (i) the light-quark contributions satisfy $\mu_{u}/\mu_{d}=e_{u}/e_{d}=-2$ in all four currents considered, reflecting a common Lorentz-color kernel; and (ii) for the $J_{3}(x)$ current the charm contribution vanishes identically, $\mu_{c}=0$, from the Dirac structure of the anti-charm coupling rather than the pseudoscalar charm-diquark embedding alone. Using four diquark-diquark-antiquark currents $J_{1}(x)$-$J_{4}(x)$ with $J^{P}=\tfrac{1}{2}^{-}$, we obtain $\mu_{J_{1}}=-1.35^{+0.35}_{-0.28}\,\mu_{N}$, $\mu_{J_{2}}=3.14^{+0.65}_{-0.50}\,\mu_{N}$, $\mu_{J_{3}}=1.01^{+0.25}_{-0.20}\,\mu_{N}$, $\mu_{J_{4}}=-1.79^{+0.41}_{-0.34}\,\mu_{N}$. These predictions are paired with the $P_{\psi s}^{\Lambda}(4338)$ and $P_{\psi s}^{\Lambda}(4459)$ on mass grounds as a working hypothesis, since the $\pm 0.11~\text{GeV}$ uncertainties accommodate either state within $1\sigma$ of all four currents. The magnitudes $|\mu|\sim 1$-$3\,\mu_{N}$ lie above quark-model and heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory expectations ($|\mu|\lesssim 0.5\,\mu_{N}$). Applying the same procedure to two previous molecular LCSR analyses yields $\mu_{u}/\mu_{d}=-1/2$ rather than $-2$, providing an LCSR-internal contrast at the flavor-decomposed level even when total magnitudes are comparable. The two signatures are immune to the state-to-current pairing and offer falsifiable tests of the compact picture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper applies multi-current QCD light-cone sum rules to four diquark-diquark-antiquark interpolating currents J1(x)–J4(x) with J^P=1/2^- for the hidden-charm pentaquarks P_ψs^Λ. It identifies two exact analytic signatures enforced by the Dirac and color algebra of the currents: μ_u/μ_d = e_u/e_d = −2 for light-quark contributions in all four currents, and μ_c=0 identically for the J3 current from its anti-charm Dirac structure. Numerical total magnetic moments are extracted as μ_J1=−1.35^{+0.35}_{-0.28} μ_N, μ_J2=3.14^{+0.65}_{-0.50} μ_N, μ_J3=1.01^{+0.25}_{-0.20} μ_N, μ_J4=−1.79^{+0.41}_{-0.34} μ_N. These are paired with the observed P_ψs^Λ(4338) and P_ψs^Λ(4459) on mass-overlap grounds (within 1σ) as a working hypothesis, and the same procedure applied to prior molecular currents yields the contrasting ratio −1/2. The signatures are presented as independent of LCSR auxiliary parameters and of the state-to-current assignment.

Significance. If the algebraic derivations hold, the work supplies parameter-free, falsifiable electromagnetic diagnostics that distinguish compact diquark-diquark-antiquark structure from molecular configurations at the flavor-decomposed level. Credit is due for the exact analytic relations (μ_u/μ_d=−2 and μ_c=0) that follow directly from current algebra without reliance on Borel mass or continuum threshold, and for the explicit LCSR-internal contrast with molecular currents. The predicted magnitudes |μ|∼1–3 μ_N lie outside the range of quark-model and heavy-pentaquark χPT expectations (≲0.5 μ_N), offering a concrete test once electromagnetic data become available.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3, after Eq. (12): the statement that the signatures are 'immune to the state-to-current pairing' is correct for the ratios, but the text should explicitly note that the numerical total moments still carry the standard LCSR systematic uncertainties from the auxiliary parameters even though the ratios do not.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1: the caption should clarify whether the quoted uncertainties on the total moments already incorporate variation of the Borel window and continuum threshold or represent only the central-value result.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract and §4: the ±0.11 GeV mass uncertainty used for the 1σ overlap with P_ψs^Λ(4338) and (4459) is stated without reference; a brief footnote citing the experimental source would improve traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive assessment of the analytic signatures and their potential as falsifiable diagnostics. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were enumerated in the report, so we provide no point-by-point responses below.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central analytic signatures (μ_u/μ_d = e_u/e_d = −2 across currents and μ_c = 0 for J3) are presented as direct algebraic consequences of the Dirac-color structure in the explicitly defined interpolating currents J1(x)–J4(x). These relations follow from the current definitions themselves rather than from any fitted parameters, LCSR auxiliary choices, or self-citations. The numerical total moments carry standard LCSR uncertainties, but the flavor-decomposed ratios and vanishing term remain independent of those inputs. No step matches the enumerated circularity patterns; the derivation chain is self-contained against the current algebra and external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard LCSR framework (OPE plus dispersion relations) plus the assumption that the chosen diquark currents faithfully encode compact structure; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Borel mass parameter
    Standard auxiliary parameter in LCSR chosen to optimize stability of the sum rule; value not specified in abstract.
  • Continuum threshold
    Standard auxiliary parameter in LCSR; value not specified in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Validity of light-cone operator product expansion and quark-hadron duality for the electromagnetic correlation functions built from the four currents.
    Invoked throughout the LCSR analysis to extract the magnetic moments from the sum rules.
  • domain assumption The physical P_ψs^Λ states can be represented by the compact diquark-diquark-antiquark currents J1-J4.
    Central modeling choice that enables the analytic relations and numerical extraction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6013 in / 1691 out tokens · 21756 ms · 2026-06-25T23:26:51.496759+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    For further details regarding this procedure, see [71]

    This choice ensures that the single dispersion approximation effectively suppresses contributions from higher resonances and the continuum. For further details regarding this procedure, see [71]. Appendix B: Photon Distribution Amplitudes For completeness, we present in this appendix the explicit forms of the non-perturbative matrix elements that appear o...

  2. [2]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 214–215.doi:10.1016/S0031-9163(64) 92001-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-9163(64 1964

  3. [3]

    S. K. Choi, et al., Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB± →K±π+π−J/ψdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262001.arXiv:hep-ex/0309032,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.262001 2003

  4. [4]

    Observation of $J/\psi p$ resonances consistent with pentaquark states in ${\Lambda_b^0\to J/\psi K^-p}$ decays

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 b→J/ψK−pDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 072001.arXiv:1507.03414,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.072001 2015

  5. [5]

    Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, $P_c(4312)^+$, and of two-peak structure of the $P_c(4450)^+$

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of thePc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (22) (2019) 222001.arXiv:1904.03947,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.222001 2019

  6. [6]

    Aaij, et al., Evidence of aJ/ψΛstructure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− b →J/ψΛK− decay, Sci

    R. Aaij, et al., Evidence of aJ/ψΛstructure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− b →J/ψΛK− decay, Sci. Bull. 66 (2021) 1278–1287.arXiv:2012.10380,doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.02.030 2021

  7. [7]

    Adachi, et al., Search for Pcs(4459) and Pcs(4338) in Upsilon(1S,2S) inclusive decays at Belle, Phys

    I. Adachi, et al., Search for Pcs(4459) and Pcs(4338) in Upsilon(1S,2S) inclusive decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (4) (2025) 041901.arXiv:2502.09951,doi:10.1103/pf8m-6j69

    work page doi:10.1103/pf8m-6j69 2025

  8. [8]

    Aaij, et al., Evidence for a new structure in theJ/ψpandJ/ψ¯psystems inB0 s →J/ψp¯pdecays, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Evidence for a new structure in theJ/ψpandJ/ψ¯psystems inB0 s →J/ψp¯pdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (6) (2022) 062001.arXiv:2108.04720,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.062001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.062001 2022

  9. [9]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of a J/ψΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ψΛp¯Decays, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of a J/ψΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B-→J/ψΛp¯Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (3) (2023) 031901.arXiv:2210.10346,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.031901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.031901 2023

  10. [10]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept. 1108 (2025) 1–108.arXiv:2404.06399, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.12.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.12.001 2025

  11. [11]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019 (2023) 1–149.arXiv:2204.08716,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.04.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.04.003 2023

  12. [12]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2) (2023) 026201.arXiv:2204.02649,doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6 2023

  13. [13]

    Four-Quark Hadrons: an Updated Review

    A. Esposito, A. L. Guerrieri, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, Four-Quark Hadrons: an Updated Review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1530002.arXiv:1411.5997,doi:10.1142/S0217751X15300021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x15300021 2015

  14. [14]

    Multiquark Resonances

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, Multiquark Resonances, Phys. Rept. 668 (2017) 1–97.arXiv:1611.07920,doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002 2017

  15. [15]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015003.arXiv:1708.04012,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015003 2018

  16. [16]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, E. S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 (2017) 143–194. arXiv:1610.04528,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 2017

  17. [17]

    New Charmonium States in QCD Sum Rules: a Concise Review

    M. Nielsen, F. S. Navarra, S. H. Lee, New Charmonium States in QCD Sum Rules: A Concise Review, Phys. Rept. 497 (2010) 41–83.arXiv:0911.1958,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.005 2010

  18. [19]

    Agaev, K

    S. Agaev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu, Four-quark exotic mesons, Turk. J. Phys. 44 (2) (2020) 95–173.arXiv:2004.12079, doi:10.3906/fiz-2003-15

    work page doi:10.3906/fiz-2003-15 2020

  19. [20]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639 (2016) 1–121.arXiv:1601.02092,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 2016

  20. [21]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange, S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 (2017) 123–198. arXiv:1706.00610,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003 2017

  21. [22]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015004, [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)].arXiv:1705.00141,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015004 2018

  22. [23]

    Pentaquark and Tetraquark states

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Pentaquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107 (2019) 237–320.arXiv:1903.11976,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003 2019

  23. [24]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, J. Segovia, Tetra- and penta-quark structures in the constituent quark model, Symmetry 12 (11) (2020) 1869.arXiv:2009.00238,doi:10.3390/sym12111869. 21

    work page doi:10.3390/sym12111869 2020

  24. [25]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules, Progr. Phys. 41 (2021) 65–93.arXiv: 2101.01021,doi:10.13725/j.cnki.pip.2021.02.001

    work page doi:10.13725/j.cnki.pip.2021.02.001 2021

  25. [26]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy–heavy hadronic molecules, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (12) (2021) 125201.arXiv:2108.02673,doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac27a2

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac27a2 2021

  26. [27]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin-3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP 02 (2026) 207.arXiv: 2510.26893,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)207

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin-3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP 02 (2026) 207.arXiv: 2510.26893,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)207

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2026)207 2026

  27. [28]

    Özdem, Shedding light on the nature of the Pcs(4459) pentaquark state, Phys

    U. Özdem, Shedding light on the nature of the Pcs(4459) pentaquark state, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) (2025) 074038.arXiv: 2411.11442,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074038

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.074038 2025

  28. [29]

    Özdem, Elucidating the nature of hidden-charm pentaquark states with spin-32 through their electromagnetic form factors, Phys

    U. Özdem, Elucidating the nature of hidden-charm pentaquark states with spin-32 through their electromagnetic form factors, Phys. Lett. B 851 (2024) 138551.arXiv:2402.03802,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138551

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138551 2024

  29. [30]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138267.arXiv:2303.10649,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138267

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138267 2023

  30. [31]

    Özdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys

    U. Özdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys. Lett. B 836 (2023) 137635.arXiv:2208.07684,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137635

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137635 2023

  31. [32]

    G.-J. Wang, R. Chen, L. Ma, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Magnetic moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states, Phys. Rev. D 94 (9) (2016) 094018.arXiv:1605.01337,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.094018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.094018 2016

  32. [33]

    Hidden charm pentaquarks: mass spectrum, magnetic moments, and photocouplings

    E. Ortiz-Pacheco, R. Bijker, C. Fernández-Ramírez, Hidden charm pentaquarks: mass spectrum, magnetic moments, and photocouplings, J. Phys. G 46 (6) (2019) 065104.arXiv:1808.10512,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab096d

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab096d 2019

  33. [34]

    Xu, Y.-L

    Y.-J. Xu, Y.-L. Liu, M.-Q. Huang, The magnetic moment ofPc(4312)as a ¯DΣc molecular state, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (5) (2021) 421.arXiv:2008.07937,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09211-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09211-8 2021

  34. [35]

    Electromagnetic multipole moments of the $P_c^+(4380)$ pentaquark in light-cone QCD

    U. Özdem, K. Azizi, Electromagnetic multipole moments of theP+ c (4380)pentaquark in light-cone QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (5) (2018) 379.arXiv:1803.06831,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5873-2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5873-2 2018

  35. [36]

    Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states:Pc(4440),P c(4457)andP cs(4459), Eur

    U. Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states:Pc(4440),P c(4457)andP cs(4459), Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (4) (2021) 277.arXiv:2102.01996,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09070-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09070-3 2021

  36. [37]

    Li, Z.-W

    M.-W. Li, Z.-W. Liu, Z.-F. Sun, R. Chen, Magnetic moments and transition magnetic moments of Pc and Pcs states, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) (2021) 054016.arXiv:2106.15053,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.054016 2021

  37. [38]

    Gao, H.-S

    F. Gao, H.-S. Li, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm strange pentaquark states*, Chin. Phys. C 46 (12) (2022) 123111. arXiv:2112.01823,doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac8651

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac8651 2022

  38. [39]

    Guo, H.-S

    F. Guo, H.-S. Li, Analysis of the hidden-charm pentaquark states based on magnetic moment and transition magnetic moment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (4) (2024) 392.arXiv:2304.10981,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12699-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12699-5 2024

  39. [40]

    Wang, S.-Q

    F.-L. Wang, S.-Q. Luo, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, Exploring the electromagnetic properties of theΞc(’,*)D¯s* and Ωc(*)D¯s*molecularstates, Phys.Rev.D108(3)(2023)034006.arXiv:2210.02809,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.034006 2023

  40. [41]

    Wang, H.-Y

    F.-L. Wang, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, What can we learn from the electromagnetic properties of hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks with single strangeness?, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) (2022) 054020.arXiv:2208.10756,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.054020

    arXiv 2022

  41. [42]

    Özdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic properties, Eur

    U. Özdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (8) (2024) 769.arXiv:2401.12678,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13124-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13124-7 2024

  42. [43]

    H.-S. Li, F. Guo, Y.-D. Lei, F. Gao, Magnetic moments and axial charges of the octet hidden-charm molecular pentaquark family, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) (2024) 094027.arXiv:2401.14767,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.094027 2024

  43. [44]

    Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys

    H.-S. Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) (2024) 114039.arXiv:2401.14759,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.114039 2024

  44. [45]

    Mutuk, X.-W

    H. Mutuk, X.-W. Kang, Unveiling the structure of hidden-bottom strange pentaquarks via magnetic moments, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138772.arXiv:2405.07066,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138772

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138772 2024

  45. [46]

    Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pentaquark states, Eur

    H. Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pentaquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (8) (2024) 874.arXiv:2403.16616, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13263-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13263-x 2024

  46. [47]

    Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm pentaquarks in the diquark–diquark–antiquark scheme, Chin

    H. Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm pentaquarks in the diquark–diquark–antiquark scheme, Chin. J. Phys. 97 (2025) 1406–1414.arXiv:2411.16486,doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2025.07.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2025.07.030 2025

  47. [48]

    Özdem, Insight into the nature of thePc(4457)and related pentaquarks, Eur

    U. Özdem, Insight into the nature of thePc(4457)and related pentaquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (6) (2025) 624.arXiv: 2409.09449,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14323-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14323-6 2025

  48. [49]

    Quasi-local photon surfaces in general spherically symmetric spacetimes.Eur

    U. Özdem, Probing the electromagnetic structure of thePc(4337)+ pentaquark: insights from a diquark–diquark–antiquark picture forJ P = 1 2 − and 3 2 − states, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (6) (2025) 704.arXiv:2506.04345,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-14439-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2025

  49. [50]

    S.-H.Zhu, F.-L.Wang, X.Liu, ElectromagneticcharacteristicsasprobesintotheinnerstructuresofthepredictedΞ (′,∗) c D(∗) s molecular states, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (4) (2026) 385.arXiv:2510.18492,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15552-z

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15552-z 2026

  50. [51]

    Özdem, Hidden-charm pentaquarks: electromagnetic structure in a diquark–diquark–antiquark model, Eur

    U. Özdem, Hidden-charm pentaquarks: electromagnetic structure in a diquark–diquark–antiquark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (4) (2026) 359.arXiv:2603.19151,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15591-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15591-6 2026

  51. [52]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic form factors: A window into theDΛc,D ∗Λc, andDΛ ∗ c molecular structure (11 2025).arXiv: 2511.16052

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic form factors: A window into theDΛc,D ∗Λc, andDΛ ∗ c molecular structure (11 2025).arXiv: 2511.16052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    Mutuk, X.-W

    H. Mutuk, X.-W. Kang, Magnetic moments of open bottom–charm molecular pentaquark octets (3 2026).arXiv:2603. 27657

    2026

  53. [54]

    V. L. Chernyak, I. R. Zhitnitsky, B meson exclusive decays into baryons, Nucl. Phys. B 345 (1990) 137–172.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90612-H

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90612-h 1990

  54. [55]

    V. M. Braun, I. E. Filyanov, QCD Sum Rules in Exclusive Kinematics and Pion Wave Function, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 157. 22 doi:10.1007/BF01548594

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01548594 1989

  55. [56]

    I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, A. V. Kolesnichenko, Radiative Decay Sigma+ —>p gamma in Quantum Chromodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 312 (1989) 509–550.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90570-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90570-1 1989

  56. [57]

    P. Ball, V. M. Braun, N. Kivel, Photon distribution amplitudes in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 649 (2003) 263–296.arXiv: hep-ph/0207307,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)01017-9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)01017-9 2003

  57. [58]

    V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov, Calculations in External Fields in Quantum Chromody- namics. Technical Review, Fortsch. Phys. 32 (1984) 585

    1984

  58. [59]

    B. L. Ioffe, A. V. Smilga, Nucleon Magnetic Moments and Magnetic Properties of Vacuum in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 232 (1984) 109–142.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90364-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90364-x 1984

  59. [60]

    D. B. Leinweber, R. M. Woloshyn, T. Draper, Electromagnetic structure of octet baryons, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1659– 1678.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.1659

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.1659 1991

  60. [61]

    Analysis of the scalar and axial-vector heavy diquark states with QCD sum rules

    Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the scalar and axial-vector heavy diquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1524.arXiv:1008.4449,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1524-y

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1524-y 2011

  61. [62]

    R. T. Kleiv, T. G. Steele, A. Zhang, I. Blokland, Heavy-light diquark masses from QCD sum rules and constituent diquark models of tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 87 (12) (2013) 125018.arXiv:1304.7816,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.125018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.125018 2013

  62. [63]

    Z.-G. Wang, Q. Xin, Analysis of the hidden-charm pentaquark candidates in theJ/ψΛmass spectrum via the QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (5) (2026) 472.arXiv:2508.17373,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15680-6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15680-6 2026

  63. [64]

    I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1989) 541–584.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90168-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90168-5 1989

  64. [65]

    V. M. Belyaev, B. Y. Blok, CHARMED BARYONS IN QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS, Z. Phys. C 30 (1986) 151. doi:10.1007/BF01560689

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01560689 1986

  65. [66]

    Quark condensate for various heavy flavors

    D. Antonov, J. E. F. T. Ribeiro, Quark condensate for various heavy flavors, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2179.arXiv: 1209.0408,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2179-7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2179-7 2012

  66. [67]

    Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Phys

    S. Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  67. [68]

    B. L. Ioffe, QCD at low energies, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 56 (2006) 232–277.arXiv:hep-ph/0502148,doi:10.1016/j. ppnp.2005.05.001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2006

  68. [69]

    Narison, mc,b, < αsG2 >andα s from Heavy Quarkonia, Nucl

    S. Narison, mc,b, < αsG2 >andα s from Heavy Quarkonia, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 300-302 (2018) 153–164.doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2018.12.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2018.12.026 2018

  69. [70]

    J. Rohrwild, Determination of the magnetic susceptibility of the quark condensate using radiative heavy meson decays, JHEP 09 (2007) 073.arXiv:0708.1405,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/073

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/073 2007

  70. [71]

    Özdem, Investigating the underlying structure of vector hidden-charm tetraquark states via their electromagnetic characteristics, Phys

    U. Özdem, Investigating the underlying structure of vector hidden-charm tetraquark states via their electromagnetic characteristics, Phys. Rev. D 111 (5) (2025) 054009.arXiv:2412.06447,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.054009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.054009 2025

  71. [72]

    U. Özdem, Unveiling the underlying structure of axial-vector bottom-charm tetraquarks in the light of their magnetic moments, JHEP 05 (2024) 301.arXiv:2403.16191,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)301

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)301 2024

  72. [73]

    Özdem, K

    U. Özdem, K. Azizi, Electromagnetic properties of vector doubly charmed tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) (2024) 114019.arXiv:2401.04798,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.114019 2024

  73. [74]

    Azizi, U

    K. Azizi, U. Özdem, Exploring the magnetic dipole moments ofTQQqs andTQQss states in the framework of QCD light-cone sum rules, JHEP 03 (2023) 166.arXiv:2301.07713,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)166

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)166 2023

  74. [75]

    Özdem, Deciphering the nature ofPΣ ψspentaquarks in the light of their electromagnetic multipole moments (4 2026)

    U. Özdem, Deciphering the nature ofPΣ ψspentaquarks in the light of their electromagnetic multipole moments (4 2026). arXiv:2604.12533

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026