Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 64 references

When Stopping Fails: Rethinking Minimal Risk Conditions through Human-Interactive Autonomous Driving for Safe Transportation Systems

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Autonomous vehicle safety must shift from passive stopping to interactive responses with humans for reliable urban use.

desk verdict The paper flags real problems with AV stopping in cities but rests on a taxonomy without counts or proof that AV tech gaps are the main cause over rules and infrastructure. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.29115 v1 pith:5NH54V6X submitted 2026-06-27 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CVcs.HC

Yash Tandon , Giovanni Tapia Lopez , Marcus Blennemann , Mohan Trivedi , Ross Greer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.HC
keywords autonomousvehiclesminimalriskconditionshuman-AVinteractionsafetyframeworksurbandeploymenttrafficincidentsinteractiveautonomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines real-world cases where autonomous vehicles stopping as a safety measure instead cause traffic blocks, emergency interference, and accessibility problems. It breaks down these failures into issues with how AVs perceive, plan, and control in uncertain situations. The analysis reveals missing abilities to understand human directions or adapt to social traffic rules. It argues that safe city deployment needs AVs that can cooperate with people rather than just halt. This matters because current designs leave AVs unable to handle the human-governed nature of roads.

What carries the argument

Taxonomy of incidents categorized by limitations in perception, planning, and control within AV architectures, which exposes the absence of mechanisms for human authority interpretation and multimodal response in existing minimal risk conditions.

What would settle it

A set of incidents where AV stopping behaviors occur without causing obstructions or interferences, or a demonstration that external factors alone explain all failures without architectural changes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Publicly documented incidents demonstrate that minimal risk conditions relying on stopping obstruct traffic flow, disrupt emergency services, and create barriers for users, stemming from gaps in perception, planning, and control that prevent interpreting human authority or responding to dynamic instructions; therefore, safety frameworks require augmentation with human-interactive capabilities for cooperative operation.

Load-bearing premise

That the documented failures stem primarily from internal AV limitations in perception, planning, and control rather than from regulatory, infrastructure, or other external factors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • AV architectures need added support for interpreting human authority in traffic situations.
  • Planning systems must handle multimodal instructions from humans and infrastructure.
  • Control mechanisms should adapt to socially regulated and dynamic traffic conditions.
  • Research into human-interactive perception and teleoperation can address these gaps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Urban AV testing protocols may need to include scenarios involving human interactions beyond stopping.
  • Policy for AV deployment could require interactive features to prevent obstruction issues.
  • Integration with smart infrastructure might enable better human-AV coordination.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that AV safety frameworks centered on minimal risk conditions (MRCs) such as stopping are insufficient for urban environments, as public incidents show these behaviors obstruct traffic, interfere with emergency response, and create accessibility issues. It presents an analysis of documented incidents categorized by limitations in perception, planning, and control; reviews research on human-interactive perception, language-grounded planning, and teleoperation; and concludes that reliable deployment requires augmenting current paradigms with cooperative human-interactive autonomy rather than relying on passive fallbacks.

Significance. If the analysis and taxonomy are substantiated, the work could usefully direct attention to gaps in passive MRC strategies and synthesize directions for interactive autonomy research, potentially informing safety standards for urban AV integration. The review of emerging capabilities in multimodal interaction and remote guidance provides a constructive bridge between incident observations and technical research agendas.

major comments (1)
  1. [Analysis of publicly documented incidents] Analysis section: the taxonomy maps incidents to perception, planning, and control limitations but supplies no incident counts, explicit selection criteria for the public records, or comparative evaluation against external factors (e.g., traffic regulations treating stopped AVs as obstacles or lack of V2I infrastructure). This is load-bearing for the central inference that internal AV architecture gaps are the primary driver necessitating replacement of passive MRCs with human-interactive autonomy rather than complementary policy or infrastructure measures.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: states that an analysis of incidents is presented but provides no overview of methodology, data sources, or quantitative scope, reducing immediate evaluability.
  2. [Review of emerging research directions] The review of research directions could benefit from more explicit linkage back to the specific incident categories identified in the taxonomy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address the major comment below and propose revisions to improve clarity and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Analysis of publicly documented incidents] Analysis section: the taxonomy maps incidents to perception, planning, and control limitations but supplies no incident counts, explicit selection criteria for the public records, or comparative evaluation against external factors (e.g., traffic regulations treating stopped AVs as obstacles or lack of V2I infrastructure). This is load-bearing for the central inference that internal AV architecture gaps are the primary driver necessitating replacement of passive MRCs with human-interactive autonomy rather than complementary policy or infrastructure measures.

    Authors: The analysis is qualitative, using publicly documented incidents to illustrate recurring failure patterns rather than providing a statistical survey. We agree that greater transparency is warranted. In revision, we will add a 'Data Sources and Methodology' subsection specifying the public records reviewed (municipal reports, news archives from cities with AV deployments), inclusion criteria (incidents where stopping behavior caused documented traffic obstruction or interaction failures), and approximate counts of incidents examined. On external factors, we will expand the discussion to acknowledge that regulations treating stopped vehicles as obstacles and the absence of V2I infrastructure contribute to the observed problems; however, the incidents still demonstrate that current AV architectures lack mechanisms for interpreting human authority or adapting to socially regulated conditions. This supports our position that interactive capabilities are a necessary complement to policy and infrastructure measures, not a sole replacement. These additions will clarify the scope of the inference without overstating the evidence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper is an analysis of publicly documented AV incidents with no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or mathematical predictions. The taxonomy categorizes incidents by perception/planning/control limitations as an organizational step based on external reports, not a self-referential definition or reduction to inputs by construction. Claims rest on cited external sources and research directions without load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes that force the central argument. This is a standard non-circular position paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a conceptual analysis and literature synthesis with no quantitative models, fitted parameters, or new postulated entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of When Stopping Fails: Rethinking Minimal Risk Conditions through Human-Interactive Autonomous Driving for Safe Transportation Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5NH54V6X

@misc{pith2026260629115,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: When Stopping Fails: Rethinking Minimal Risk Conditions through Human-Interactive Autonomous Driving for Safe Transportation Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5NH54V6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.29115}
}
read the original abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are increasingly deployed in urban environments, yet their safety frameworks remain primarily designed around collision avoidance and minimal risk condition (MRC) behaviors such as slowing or stopping when uncertainty arises. Although effective in reducing immediate crash risk, real-world deployments indicate that stopping alone does not guarantee safe integration into human-governed roadway systems. Incidents reported by municipalities and public records show that AV fallback behaviors can obstruct traffic, interfere with emergency response operations, and create accessibility challenges for passengers and pedestrians. This paper presents an analysis of publicly documented incidents involving AV stopping behavior and human-AV interaction failures. We categorize these incidents according to limitations in perception, planning, and control within current AV architectures. Using this taxonomy, we identify key gaps in existing safety paradigms, particularly the lack of mechanisms for interpreting human authority, responding to multimodal instructions, and adapting to dynamic, socially regulated traffic conditions. We then review emerging research directions that support human-interactive perception, language-grounded and accessibility-aware planning, and assisted control through remote guidance and teleoperation. The analysis highlights the need to augment current AV safety frameworks with capabilities that enable cooperative interaction with human agents and infrastructure. These findings suggest that reliable urban deployment of AVs requires moving beyond passive fallback strategies toward human-interactive autonomy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29115 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustrative reconstruction of a reported incident in Austin, Texas, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Waymo’s investments in san francisco may be paying off,

    T. B. Lee, “Waymo’s investments in san francisco may be paying off,” Understanding AI, 05 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //www.understandingai.org/p/waymos-investments-in-san-francisco

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Pave virtual panel

    Z. R. Adam Campbell, Bart Teeter, “Pave virtual panel ”open roads: Av operations in texas - part 2”,” YouTube, March 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WfXGA8mQDU

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Experiences with autonomous vehicle in us cities,

    M. C. D’Agostino, C. E. Michael, and P. S. Venkataram, “Experiences with autonomous vehicle in us cities,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-autonomous-vehicles-could-c hange-cities/

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Sf cops, firefighters vent before big vote on driverless car expansion,

    Y . Zhou, “Sf cops, firefighters vent before big vote on driverless car expansion,” Mission Local, 08 2023. [Online]. Available: https://missionlocal.org/2023/08/sf-cops-firefighters-vent-prior-to-big -vote-on-driverless-car-expansion/

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Cpuc status conference: Safety issues regarding driverless av interactions with first responders,

    J. Nicholson, D. Luttropp, N. Jones, and J. Friedlander, “Cpuc status conference: Safety issues regarding driverless av interactions with first responders,” 08 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sfmta.com/site s/default/files/reports-and-documents/2023/08/2023.08.07 cpuc status conference 8.7.2023 final.pdf

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    J. P. Tumlin, T. Chang, and R. Hillis, “San Francisco’s application to rehear resolution TL-19145 approving authorization for Cruise LLC’s expanded service in autonomous vehicle passenger service phase I driverless deployment program,” City and County of San Francisco, Tech. Rep., Sep. 2023, accessed: Mar. 1, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://docs.cpuc.c...

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Re: Protest of cruise llc tier 2 advice letter (0002),

    N. B. Jeffrey Tumlin, Tilly Chang, “Re: Protest of cruise llc tier 2 advice letter (0002),” Jan 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sfmt a.com/sites/default/files/reports-and-documents/2023/01/2023.01.25 ccs f 23.0125 cpuc cruise tier 2 advice letter protest 002.pdf

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    San francisco moves to block robotaxi expansion,

    J. B. White, “San francisco moves to block robotaxi expansion,” Politico, 08 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.politico.com/news/ 2023/08/17/san-francisco-block-robotaxi-expansion-00111657

    work page 2023

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    J3016 202104 - taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles,

    On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee, “J3016 202104 - taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles,” 04 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sae.org/standards/j3016 202104-taxonomy-definitions-ter ms-related-drivin...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Minimal risk condition behaviors based on environmental and vehicle conditions,

    Automated Driving Behaviors Consortium, “Minimal risk condition behaviors based on environmental and vehicle conditions,” 06 2019. [Online]. Available: https://pronto-core-cdn.prontomarketing.com/2/w p-content/uploads/sites/2896/2019/07/Minimal-Risk-Condition-Behavio rs-June-2...

    2019

  3. [11]

    Waymos in san francisco caused chaos during mass power outage,

    J. Ding and M. Liedtke, “Waymos in san francisco caused chaos during mass power outage,” AP News, 12 2025. [Online]. Available: https://apnews.com/article/waymo-cars-san-francisco-power-outage-tra ffic-81e6a00aa2be6b804fe0bdfbcf07401f

    2025

  4. [12]

    ‘lost time for no reason’: How driverless taxis are stressing cities,

    Y . Lu, “‘lost time for no reason’: How driverless taxis are stressing cities,” 11 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/1 1/20/technology/driverless-taxis-cars-cities.html

    2023

  5. [13]

    Waymo robotaxi blocks ems responding to austin mass shooting,

    N. Cobler, “Waymo robotaxi blocks ems responding to austin mass shooting,” Axios, 03 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.axios.com/ local/austin/2026/03/02/waymo-vehicle-blocks-ems-austin-mass-shoot ing

    2026

  6. [14]

    Assembly standing committee on transportation,

    California State Assembly and CalMatters Digital Democracy, “Assembly standing committee on transportation,” 04 2024. [Online]. Available: https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/hearings/257824#t= 1549&f=990acfa7cc45c1e0dec9c004c588c025

    2024

  7. [15]

    Autonomous vehicle good citizenry standard,

    S. M. Kaufman, J. Y . J. Chow, B. Liu, A. Yamron, and M. Geck, “Autonomous vehicle good citizenry standard,” 07 2022. [Online]. Available: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/67860/dot 67860 DS1.pdf

    2022

  8. [16]

    Automated vehicles and people living with a disability: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions for sustainable mobility,

    E. Yousfi, T. Jacquet, and N. M ´etayer, “Automated vehicles and people living with a disability: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions for sustainable mobility,”Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 13, p. 5941, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Autonomous vehicle safety and accessibility for people with disabilities - dredf,

    DREDF, “Autonomous vehicle safety and accessibility for people with disabilities - dredf,” DREDF, 03 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dredf.org/autonomous-vehicle-safety-and-accessibility-for-peopl e-with-disabilities/

    2023

  10. [18]

    The architectural implications of autonomous driving: Constraints and acceleration,

    S.-C. Lin, Y . Zhang, C.-H. Hsu, M. Skach, M. E. Haque, L. Tang, and J. Mars, “The architectural implications of autonomous driving: Constraints and acceleration,” inConference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, 2018, pp. 751–766

    2018

  11. [19]

    The era of end-to-end autonomy: Transitioning from rule-based driving to large driving models,

    E. Nebot and J. S. B. Perez, “The era of end-to-end autonomy: Transitioning from rule-based driving to large driving models,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16050

    2026

  12. [20]

    Planning-oriented autonomous driving,

    Y . Hu, J. Yang, L. Chen, K. Li, C. Sima, X. Zhu, S. Chai, S. Du, T. Lin, W. Wanget al., “Planning-oriented autonomous driving,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 17 853–17 862

    2023

  13. [21]

    Language- driven active learning for diverse open-set 3d object detection,

    R. Greer, B. Antoniussen, A. Møgelmose, and M. Trivedi, “Language- driven active learning for diverse open-set 3d object detection,” in Proceedings of the Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2025, pp. 980–988

    2025

  14. [22]

    Autonomous vehicle (av) tenets,

    Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, “Autonomous vehicle (av) tenets,” 11 2020. [Online]. Available: https://saferoads.org/wp-content /uploads/2020/11/AV-Tenets-11-24-20-1.pdf

    2020

  15. [23]

    Exclusive: Driverless robotaxis are causing less mayhem on s.f. streets. city officials explain why,

    R. Cano, “Exclusive: Driverless robotaxis are causing less mayhem on s.f. streets. city officials explain why,”San Francisco Chronicle, 02

  16. [24]

    Available: https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/driverl ess-robotaxis-incidents-decrease-18672791.php

    [Online]. Available: https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/driverl ess-robotaxis-incidents-decrease-18672791.php

  17. [25]

    A comparison of uncertainty estimation approaches in deep learning components for autonomous vehicle applications,

    F. Arnez, H. Espinoza, A. Radermacher, and F. Terrier, “A comparison of uncertainty estimation approaches in deep learning components for autonomous vehicle applications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15172, 2020

    2006

  18. [26]

    195. partnering with law enforcement for safer avs,

    SAE International, “195. partnering with law enforcement for safer avs,” YouTube, 08 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.co m/watch?v=TvhSmCwtmJw

    2024

  19. [27]

    doscenes: An autonomous driving dataset with natural lan- guage instruction for human interaction and vision-language navigation,

    P. Roy, S. Perisetla, S. Shriram, H. Krishnaswamy, A. Keskar, and R. Greer, “doscenes: An autonomous driving dataset with natural lan- guage instruction for human interaction and vision-language navigation,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    ”it must be gesturing towards me

    X. Chang, Z. Chen, X. Dong, Y . Cai, T. Yan, H. Cai, Z. Zhou, G. Zhou, and J. Gong, “”it must be gesturing towards me”: Gesture-based inter- action between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians,” inProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 202...

    2024

  21. [29]

    P3474/d2, apr 2025 - ieee draft standard for human intentions and artificial intelligence alignment in autonomous driving agent,

    V . A. V . S. Committee, “P3474/d2, apr 2025 - ieee draft standard for human intentions and artificial intelligence alignment in autonomous driving agent,”IEEE P3474/D2, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: A survey of theory and practice,

    A. Rasouli and J. K. Tsotsos, “Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: A survey of theory and practice,”IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 900–918, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Towards a multi-agent vision-language system for zero-shot novel hazardous object detection for autonomous driving safety,

    S. Shriram, S. Perisetla, A. Keskar, H. Krishnaswamy, T. E. W. Bossen, A. Møgelmose, and R. Greer, “Towards a multi-agent vision-language system for zero-shot novel hazardous object detection for autonomous driving safety,” in2025 IEEE 21st International Conference on Automa- ...

    2025

  24. [32]

    Robust scenario mining assisted by multimodal semantics,

    Y . Chen and R. Greer, “Robust scenario mining assisted by multimodal semantics,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2025, pp. 1792–1801

    2025

  25. [33]

    A novel image dataset for detecting and classifying mobility aid users,

    S. D ´avila-Sober´on, A. Morales-D ´ıaz, and M. Castel´an, “A novel image dataset for detecting and classifying mobility aid users,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 293, p. 128697, 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    Urban pedestrian routes’ accessibility assessment using geographic information system processing and deep learning-based object detection,

    T. E. Mart ´ınez-Chao, A. Men ´endez-D´ıaz, S. Garc ´ıa-Cort´es, and P. D’Agostino, “Urban pedestrian routes’ accessibility assessment using geographic information system processing and deep learning-based object detection,”Sensors, vol. 24, pp. 3667–3667, 06 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Rampnet: A two-stage pipeline for bootstrapping curb ramp detection in streetscape images from open government metadata,

    J. S. O’Meara, J. Hwang, Z. Wang, M. Saugstad, and J. E. Froehlich, “Rampnet: A two-stage pipeline for bootstrapping curb ramp detection in streetscape images from open government metadata,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2025, pp. 6656–6665

    2025

  28. [36]

    Video: Driverless car pulled over by san francisco police,

    C. Kafton, “Video: Driverless car pulled over by san francisco police,” KTVU FOX 2 San Francisco, 04 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ktvu.com/news/video-driverless-car-pulled-over-by-san-f rancisco-police

    2022

  29. [37]

    Robot delivery cart blocks fire truck in hollywood intersection, video shows,

    L. Dallow, “Robot delivery cart blocks fire truck in hollywood intersection, video shows,” KTLA, 09 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ktla.com/news/local-news/robot-delivery-cart-blocks-fire-truck-i n-hollywood-intersection-video-shows/

    2025

  30. [38]

    Apd officers move waymo vehicles pulled over during severe weather,

    E. Pauda, “Apd officers move waymo vehicles pulled over during severe weather,” kxan, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.kxan.c om/news/local/austin/apd-officers-successfully-and-safely-move-way mo-vehicles-blocking-traffic/

    2025

  31. [39]

    Cruise suspends driverless robotaxi service nationwide,

    T. A. Press and O. Palma, “Cruise suspends driverless robotaxi service nationwide,” 10 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kqed.org/news/ 11965752/cruise-suspends-driverless-robotaxi-service-nationwide

    2023

  32. [40]

    2 waymo self-driving cars stall at sf pride parade street closures during heavy traffic,

    J. Stone, “2 waymo self-driving cars stall at sf pride parade street closures during heavy traffic,” ABC7 San Francisco, 06 2023. [Online]. Available: https://abc7news.com/post/waymo-stalled-self-driving-car-s f-pride-robotaxi/13427435/

    2023

  33. [41]

    Waymos blocked roads and caused chaos during san francisco power outage,

    Associated Press, “Waymos blocked roads and caused chaos during san francisco power outage,”AP News, 12 2025. [Online]. Available: https://apnews.com/article/waymo-cars-san-francisco-power-outage-tra ffic-81e6a00aa2be6b804fe0bdfbcf07401f

    2025

  34. [42]

    Authorized traffic controller hand gesture recognition for situation-aware autonomous driving,

    A. Mishra, J. Kim, J. Cha, D. Kim, and S. Kim, “Authorized traffic controller hand gesture recognition for situation-aware autonomous driving,”Sensors, vol. 21, no. 23, p. 7914, 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Waymo’s robotaxis pass the first responder test,

    A. J. Hawkins, “Waymo’s robotaxis pass the first responder test,” The Verge, 12 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/2024/12 /13/24319860/waymo-robotaxi-first-responder-tuv-sud-analysis

    2024

  36. [44]

    T. E. Bossen, A. Møgelmose, and R. Greer, “Can vision-language models understand and interpret dynamic gestures from pedestrians? pilot datasets and exploration towards instructive nonverbal commands for cooperative autonomous vehicles,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision an...

    2025

  37. [45]

    Work zone data exchange (wzdx) — us department of transportation,

    U.S. Department of Transportation, “Work zone data exchange (wzdx) — us department of transportation,” Transportation.gov, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.transportation.gov/av/data/wzdx

    2023

  38. [46]

    Utilizing work zone event data in connected and smarter work zone applications-maricopa county, arizona regional work zone management and operations overview

    U. D. of Transportation, “Utilizing work zone event data in connected and smarter work zone applications-maricopa county, arizona regional work zone management and operations overview.” [Online]. Available: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop20022/fhwahop20022.pdf

  39. [47]

    Talk2car: Taking control of your self-driving car,

    T. Deruyttere, S. Vandenhende, D. Grujicic, L. Van Gool, and M. F. Moens, “Talk2car: Taking control of your self-driving car,” inConfer- ence on empirical methods in natural language processing and joint conference on natural language processing, 2019, pp. 2088–2098

    2019

  40. [48]

    Giving commands to a self-driving car: How to deal with uncertain situations?

    T. Deruyttere, V . Milewski, and M.-F. Moens, “Giving commands to a self-driving car: How to deal with uncertain situations?”Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 103, p. 104257, 08 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Talk2car: Predicting physical trajectories for natural language commands,

    T. Deruyttere, D. Grujicic, M. B. Blaschko, and M.-F. Moens, “Talk2car: Predicting physical trajectories for natural language commands,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 123 809–123 834, 01 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Natural language in- structions for scene-responsive human-in-the-loop motion planning in autonomous driving using vision-language-action models,

    A. Martinez-Sanchez, P. Roy, and R. Greer, “Natural language in- structions for scene-responsive human-in-the-loop motion planning in autonomous driving using vision-language-action models,”IEEE Intel- ligent Vehicles Symposium, 2026

    2026

  43. [51]

    About CDS — open mobility foundation,

    Open Mobility Foundation, “About CDS — open mobility foundation,” 01 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.openmobilityfoundation.org /about-cds/

    2022

  44. [52]

    City of san francisco - curb ramps,

    San Francisco Public Works, “City of san francisco - curb ramps,” Data.gov, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://catalog-beta.data.gov/datas et/curb-ramps

    2026

  45. [53]

    Pick-up and drop-off at the curb,

    Urban Robotics Foundation, “Pick-up and drop-off at the curb,” Urban Robotics Fdn., 05 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.urbanrobotic sfoundation.org/post/pick-up-and-drop-off-at-the-curb

    2025

  46. [54]

    Network- based pick-up and drop-off location optimization for shared autonomous vehicles,

    S. Wang, F. Ding, Y . Wang, A. Gar on Yeh, and G. Huang, “Network- based pick-up and drop-off location optimization for shared autonomous vehicles,”Urban Informatics, vol. 4, 05 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Driving towards inclusion: A systematic review of ai-powered accessibility enhancements for people with disability in autonomous vehicles,

    A. Bastola, H. Wang, P. H. B. Sayed, J. Brinkley, A. J. Moshayedi, and A. Razi, “Driving towards inclusion: A systematic review of ai-powered accessibility enhancements for people with disability in autonomous vehicles,” inIEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  48. [56]

    Trajectory prediction in autonomous driving with a lane heading auxiliary loss,

    R. Greer, N. Deo, and M. Trivedi, “Trajectory prediction in autonomous driving with a lane heading auxiliary loss,”IEEE Robotics and Automa- tion Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4907–4914, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    Avsc releases best practice for automated driving system remote assistance use case,

    Automated Vehicle Safety Consortium, “Avsc releases best practice for automated driving system remote assistance use case,” Sae-itc.com, 11

  50. [58]

    Available: https://avsc.sae-itc.com/news/avsc-releases-b est-practice-automated-driving-system-remote-assistance-use-case

    [Online]. Available: https://avsc.sae-itc.com/news/avsc-releases-b est-practice-automated-driving-system-remote-assistance-use-case

  51. [59]

    Waymo defends use of remote assistance workers in robotaxi operations,

    D. Shepardson, “Waymo defends use of remote assistance workers in robotaxi operations,”Reuters, 02 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/technology/waymo-defends-use-remote-assista nce-workers-robotaxi-operations-2026-02-17/

    2026

  52. [60]

    Taxonomy and survey on remote human input systems for driving automation systems,

    D. Bogdoll, S. Orf, L. T ¨ottel, and J. M. Z ¨ollner, “Taxonomy and survey on remote human input systems for driving automation systems,” in Proceedings of FICC, 2022

    2022

  53. [61]

    Network latency in teleoperation of connected and autonomous vehicles: A review of trends, challenges, and mitigation strategies,

    S. B. Kamtam, Q. Lu, F. Bouali, O. C. L. Haas, and S. Birrell, “Network latency in teleoperation of connected and autonomous vehicles: A review of trends, challenges, and mitigation strategies,”Sensors, vol. 24, pp. 3957–3957, 06 2024

    2024

  54. [62]

    Teleoperation technologies for enhancing connected and autonomous vehicles,

    S. Lu, R. Zhong, and W. Shi, “Teleoperation technologies for enhancing connected and autonomous vehicles,” in2022 IEEE 19th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Smart Systems (MASS), 2022

    2022

  55. [63]

    How we make remote driving possible - vay,

    D. Gillespie, “How we make remote driving possible - vay,” Vay, 12

  56. [64]

    Available: https://vay.io/how-we-make-remote-driving -possible/

    [Online]. Available: https://vay.io/how-we-make-remote-driving -possible/

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.